Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ON
ANALYSIS OF BRAND EQUITY AND CONSUMER BEHAVIOR
AT
EUREKA FORBES LIMITED
SUBMITTED TO:
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of
Master of Business Administration
(2013-2015)
SUBMITTED BY:
REGISTER NO:
50004___________ .
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the Dissertation Project entitled ANALYSIS OF BRAND
EQUITY AND CONSUMER BEHAVIOR carried out by Mr.Akhil Francis in partial
fulfilment of the requirements of the Master of Business Administration (MBA)
of Mahatma Gandhi University is a bonafide report of the work done by him under
our supervision and guidance. This is also to certify that this report has not been
submitted to any other Institute/University for the award of any Degree.
However, this certificate is not issued to endorse the views and opinions
expressed in the report.
Academic Guide
Dean
DECLARATION
I, Akhil Francis do here by declare that this report on ANALYSIS OF BRAND EQUITY
AND CONSUMER BEHAVIOR submitted to Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam in
partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master Of Business
Administration is a bonafide record of Dissertation project undergone by me in the firm
and prepared under the guidance of Prof. RajaMohan Kadavil, BHARATA MATA
INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT, Thrikkakara. I also declare that this training report is
my original work and that it has not been submitted to any other Institute/University for
the award of any Degree.
Place: THRIKKAKARA
FRANCIS
Date:
AKHIL
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In preparing this report I have been fortunate enough to get support from number
of people to whom I shall remain grateful.
First and foremost I thank god almighty for giving me the ability to do this study
and make the venture a success.
I hereby express my deep gratitude to Mr.Sarath.R, Asst. Manager HR and Administration,
Eureka Forbes Limited.for his valuable information for doing this project
I would like to express my deep felt gratitude to our Dean, Dr.Mary Joseph T my
heartfelt gratitude to her for the unremitting support bestowed upon me all through.
I am very thankful to Prof. RajaMohan Kadavil my guide, who have rendered
timely relevant information, valuable suggestions, assistance and encouragement which I
found extremely useful for the Dissertation Project.
I also express my sincere thanks to all officers, staff and workers of Eureka Forbes
Limited. for the co-operation extended to me during the period of study.
Finally I thank all my friends and each and everyone who have directly or
indirectly helped for the successful completion of this project work.
AKHIL FRANCIS
CONTENTS
CHAPTER
2
3
4
TITLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
1.1 General Introduction
1.2 Problem Statement
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.5 Research Methodology
1.6 Sampling
1.7 Type of data collection technique
1.9 Limitation of the Study
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Review of Literature
PROFILES
3.1 Industry Profile
3.2 Company Profile
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
4.1 Analysis of Brand Equity
4.2 Analysis of Consumer Behavior
4.3 Analysis of Below The Line Activities
FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION
5.1 Summary of the findings
5.2 Suggestions
5.3 Conclusion
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
Questionnaire
PAGE
NO
1
4
5
5
6
7
7
9
10
12
16
22
39
53
57
59
61
62
63
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
TITLE
NO
4.1.1.1
4.1.1.2
PAGE
NO
22
23
4.1.1.3
24
4.1.1.4
25
4.1.2.1
26
4.1.2.2
27
4.1.2.3
product-Overall Analysis
Respondents perception of Aquaguard as a trustworthy and
28
4.1.2.4
4.1.3.1
4.1.3.2
4.1.3.3
4.1.3.4
4.1.4.1
4.1.5.1
4.1.6
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
28
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
39
40
41
4.2.5
4.2.6
43
44
4.2.7
decision
Appropriate maintenance cost for water purifier
45
4.2.8
46
4.2.9
4.2.10
47
48
4.2.11
49
4.2.4
4.2.12
4.2.13
42
50
51
4.2.14
52
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
NO
4.1.1.1
4.1.1.2
4.1.1.3
TITLE
Respondents perception of Aqua guard as a quality product
according to the -Overall Analysis
Respondents view about the after sales service being up to the
expectation on the basis of -Overall Analysis
Respondents perception of Aquaguard as their best choice on the
basis of -Overall Analysis
PAGE
NO
22
23
24
4.1.1.4
25
4.1.2.1
26
4.1.2.2
27
product-Overall Analysis
4.1.2.3
4.1.2.4
4.1.3.1
28
29
30
4.2.5
4.2.6
4.2.7
decision
Appropriate maintenance cost for water purifier
45
4.2.8
46
4.2.9
4.2.10
47
48
4.2.11
49
4.2.13
4.2.14
52
4.1.3.2
4.1.3.3
4.1.3.4
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.2.4
4.2.12
31
32
33
39
40
41
42
43
44
50
51