Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
article info
abstract
Article history:
In this paper, a laminar flame speed correlation was developed and validated for the
This correlation was derived through the tabulated data which was determined by a self-
26 November 2012
Wide ranges of hydrogen volume fractions (0e10%), equivalence ratios (0.6e1.5), unburned
gas temperatures (300e2500 K), pressures (1e50 bar) and residual gas mass fractions (0
e20%) were simultaneously considered in this correlation to cover the burning conditions
Keywords:
encountered in SI engines. The estimated values of the new correlation were found to be in
Hydrogen
satisfying agreement with the experimental data under normal burning conditions.
Gasoline
Moreover, the new correlation was implemented in the extended coherent flame model to
evaluate its suitability for CFD simulation. Satisfying agreement between the experimental
SI engines
and calculated results was observed under all examined hydrogen addition levels. This
CFD simulation
indicated that the new correlation was suitable for the CFD simulation of hydrogenenriched gasoline engines.
Copyright 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights
reserved.
1.
Introduction
In recent years, the in-depth investigation and optimization of alternative fuel-powered engines are increasingly
performed using the CFD simulation. The predictive CFD
combustion models for hydrogen-gasoline blends could
greatly facilitate the development of hydrogen-enriched
gasoline engines. Laminar flame speed is one of the most
fundamental properties of combustive mixtures. Most of the
CFD combustion models, such as coherent flame model (CFM),
stress the importance of the laminar flame speed data at
engine-relevant conditions [8]. In these models, the determination of burning rate highly relies on the laminar flame speed
at instantaneous cylinder temperature, pressure, and mixture
composition. Therefore, it is of strong necessity to obtain the
accurate data of laminar flame speed at engine-relevant
1998
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 9 9 7 e2 0 0 6
2.
Review of the literature data and feasible
approaches
2.1.
Literature data
2.2.
Feasible approaches for estimating laminar flame
speed of hydrogen-gasoline blends
Since the combustion reaction process is highly nonlinear, the
laminar flame speed of binary fuel blends cannot be determined by linearly combining the laminar flame speed of each
individual fuel component. Aiming at efficiently estimating
the laminar flame speed of binary fuel blends with satisfying
accuracy, many researches have been dedicated to develop
predictive laminar flame speed models for binary fuel blends.
Law and coauthors [20,21] observed that the laminar flame
speed of hydrogen-hydrocarbon blends was increased almost
linearly with the increase of the hydrogen addition parameter
RH. A linear correlation was developed as follows:
SL F; RH SL F; 0 kF$RH
(1)
(2)
In Eq. (2), mi ru,iSL,i with ru,i and SL,i being the density of the
unburned mixture and laminar flame speed of the ith fuel
component, respectively. Yi,u is the mass fraction of the ith
fuel component in the unburned mixture. The coefficient c is
a free parameter. The laminar flame speed of binary fuel
blends can be obtained as SL m/ru. The proposed model was
found to be predictive for hydrogen-methane and DMEmethane blends under normal burning conditions. However,
the squared model of Chen et al. [22] is not parameter free.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 9 9 7 e2 0 0 6
1999
1
SL;hydrogenmethane XH2 =SL;hydrogen 1 XH2 =SL;methane
3.1.
Flame temperature-based mixing rule for laminar
flame speed
(3)
As it is analyzed in the above section, the flame temperaturebased mixing rule [15,16] is a potential way for effectively
si $ln SL;i
#
(4)
i1
Xi $Ni
$
$Tad;i
Tad;m
Nm
1
(5)
2
X
Xi $Ni
(6)
i1
Tad;i Tu
Tad;m
Qi
Ni $Cp
2
X
Xi $Ni
i1
Nm
(7)
$Tad;i
(8)
3.2.
3.
2
X
According to the flame-temperature-based mixing rule introduced above, a calculation program is specially developed to
calculate the laminar flame speeds of hydrogen-gasoline
blends at a wide range of burning conditions.
2000
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 9 9 7 e2 0 0 6
3 2
SL;0
a0
4 aT 5 4 b0
bp
c0
2
a1
b1
c1
3.3.
where the VH2 and Vair represent the volumes of hydrogen and
air in the intake charge [dm3], respectively. In the database,
the hydrogen volume fraction in the total intake gas is varied
from 0% to 10%. The equivalence ratio is varied from 0.6 to
1.5. The unburned gas temperature is varied from 300 to
(10)
3
.a8
T
.b8 5$ 1 F F2 aH2 a2H2 FaH2 F2 aH2 Fa2H2 F2 a2H2
.c8
(11)
2001
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 9 9 7 e2 0 0 6
Value
49.8508
133.9972
55.4971
157.4988
1516.7802
545.4127
241.5668
646.0548
10.4278
Parameter
b0
b1
b2
b3
b4
b5
b6
b7
b8
(F
(F
(F
(F
(F
(F
(F
(F
(F
4.
4.1.
1:0)
1:0)
1:0)
1:0)
1:0)
1:0)
1:0)
1:0)
1:0)
Value
2.9486
0.7494
0.0264
20.1404
13.3876
33.0797
15.6721
42.9936
28.0143
Parameter
b0
b1
b2
b3
b4
b5
b6
b7
b8
(F > 1:0)
(F > 1:0)
(F > 1:0)
(F > 1:0)
(F > 1:0)
(F > 1:0)
(F > 1:0)
(F > 1:0)
(F > 1:0)
Value
Parameter
Value
2.9729
0.8017
0.0018
6.5013
12.5686
4.5552
0.7006
16.3882
5.5966
c0
c1
c2
c3
c4
c5
c6
c7
c8
0.3781
0.2096
0.0048
3.3960
1.7898
3.9679
1.3055
1.3144
0.1638
2002
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 9 9 7 e2 0 0 6
2003
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 9 9 7 e2 0 0 6
4.2.
CFD results
4.2.1.
CFD model
The calculations are performed using the CFD code AVL FIRE.
The k-z-f model [30] is applied to take account of the turbulence effect. The combustion is described by the ECFM [31,32].
The spherical model [31] is used to capture the flame kernel
formation. The flame thickness is determined through the
Blint correlation [33]. Meanwhile, the near-wall treatment
follows the description proposed by Popovac et al. [34].
The modeled engine is a 1.6L four-cylinder SI engine
manufactured by Beijing Hyundai Motors. The detailed engine
specifications are listed in Table 2. The original engine is
modified so that the hydrogen and gasoline can be simultaneously injected in the intake manifolds and mixed with air at
the end of the intake stroke. The calculations are conducted at
an engine speed of 1400 rpm and a MAP of 61.5 kPa, which
could represent one of the typical city driving conditions. The
global equivalence ratio of hydrogen-gasoline-air mixtures is
fixed at 0.8 and the spark timing is kept at 22 CA ATDC for all
the test cases. Three hydrogen volume fractions in the total
intake gas of 0%, 3% and 6% are selected to explore the
combustion process in the hydrogen-enriched gasoline
engine. The corresponding experimental results have been
16.96
16.61
23.1
21.7
e
2.06
27.4
28.0
e
2.19
38.8
37.8
e
2.58
23.2
22.2
16.87
25.20
36.09
21.8
17.2
6.5
0.53
e
43.21
27.7
23.0
15.5
1.09
e
32.61
36.7
21.6
12.2
5.41
e
43.52
21.7
10.6
0.2
25.62
31.58
37.94
17.1
12.5
5.5
1.67
e
20.14
22.6
18.2
14.0
1.74
e
23.08
21.0
16.7
11.8
2.78
e
29.34
10.9
5.6
2.1
31.56
12.2
0.06
19.2
5.49
17.0
1.80
5.6
2004
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 9 9 7 e2 0 0 6
4.2.2.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 9 9 7 e2 0 0 6
peak pressure (qPmax) is advanced compared with the experimental data at the hydrogen volume fractions of 3% and 6%.
When the CFD calculation is conducted using the new correlation, the relevant error on the peak pressure (pmax) is 0.53%,
1.67% and 0.06% at the hydrogen volume fractions of 0%, 3%
and 6%. The error on the relevant crank angle for the peak
pressure at the hydrogen volume fractions of 3% and 6% is
only 0.1 and 0.3 CA, respectively. Comparatively, with the
implementation of the Le Chateliers Rule-like formula [17],
the pmax is 2.06%, 43.21% and 20.14% at the hydrogen volume
fractions of 0%, 3% and 6%. Moreover, the error on the relevant
crank angle for the peak pressure is 10.7 and 7.0 CA at the
hydrogen volume fractions of 3% and 6%, respectively. This is
because the overestimated laminar flame speed of the Le
Chateliers Rule-like formula [17] leads to the advanced and
shortened heat release of the CFD calculation, which results in
the disagreement with the experimental results after the
addition of hydrogen.
The detailed comparison data is listed in Table 3, including
the peak in-cyinder pressure (Pmax), relevant crank angle for
the peak pressure (qPmax), relevant error on the peak pressure
(pmax), flame development period (CA0-10), relevant error on
the flame development period (CA0-10), flame propagation
period (CA10-90), relevant error on the flame propagation
period (CA10-90), and relevant crank angle for 50% mass fraction burned (CA50). The calculated results at hydrogen volume
fraction of 0% are in good agreement with the experimental
data for both correlations. For the high hydrogen addition
levels, the CFD results using the new correlation are much
closer to the experimental data than those calculated using
the Le Chateliers Rule-like formula [17]. This indicates that
the new correlation is more suitable for the CFD calculation on
the combustion process in hydrogen-enriched gasoline
engines.
5.
Conclusions
2005
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Program on Key Basic
Research Project (973 Program) (Grant No.2013CB228403), Key
Program of Sci & Tech Project of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (Grant No.KZ201210005002), Ph.D. Programs
Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (Grant
No.20111103110010) and Beijing Municipal Natural Science
Foundation (Grant No. 3122006). The authors would also like
to express their gratitude towards the technical support
received from Dr. P. Priesching and Mr. M. Suffa in AVL List
GmbH, Graz, Austria.
references
2006
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 9 9 7 e2 0 0 6