Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2007
Department of Architecture
The details in this Guide were correct at the time of going to press.
However, the Department cannot guarantee that minor details of the
actual examination process may differ slightly from those stated in this
Guide.
Page 1
Contents
1.
WELCOME
2.
SUMMARY
3.
PART 3 AT A GLANCE
4.
ELIGIBILITY
5.
READINESS
6.
APPLICATION
7.
PREPARATION
10
8.
11
9.
12
10.
THE EXAMINATION
13
10.1.
Requirements
13
10.2.
13
10.3.
14
10.4.
14
10.5.
Written Examinations
15
10.6.
16
10.7.
Submission Dates
18
10.8.
Results
18
10.9.
Assistance
18
11.
GUIDE TO SELF-LEARNING
20
11.1.
20
11.2.
Study Groups
20
11.3.
ARB/RIBA Criteria
21
12.
EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES
22
13.
23
13.1.
23
13.2.
Contract Documents
23
13.3.
Building Acts
24
13.4.
Planning Acts
24
14.
26
15.
28
16.
32
17.
34
18.
36
Page 2
1. Welcome
1.1. Welcome to the Department of Architecture in the School of the Built Environment,
Oxford Brookes University.
1.2. Founded in 1927, the Department of Architecture is one of the largest in the UK and a
highly regarded centre of education for architecture and the built environment. Design,
practicality and social purpose are central to the Departments tradition.
1.3. The Department is at the forefront of thinking about how professionals and the industry
can work together in the public interest both in the EU and worldwide.
1.4. It has over 1,000 students, supported by some 200 academic and support staff. Many
students are from overseas, many in postgraduate programmes including taught Masters
programmes and research degrees.
1.5. The Department has extensive academic links with over 120 universities and
organisations across the world, which provide opportunities for collaboration and study
abroad. There are also strong links with industry worldwide and it has a highly rated
research portfolio.
1.6. The Department runs architecture programmes that are accredited by the Royal
Institute of British Architects (RIBA) and the Architects Registration Board (ARB) for Parts
1, 2, and 3 and has strong links with architectural practices. For further information about
the departments activities please have a look at our website at: www.brookes.ac.uk
1.7. This guide is intended to help you to prepare for the Part 3 Examination in Practice
and Management, that allows you entry into the architectural profession, and we hope that
you will find it informative. If you have and suggestions that might improve the guide please
convey them to Steve Race, the Professional Studies Advisor.
Good luck with your preparations for the examination.
Professor Mark Swenarton
Head of the Department of Architecture
Page 3
2. Summary
2.1 The Part 3 Examination in Practice and Management is the final stage in an architects
education and training and the foundation for life-long learning and development as a
member of the architectural profession.
2.2 Candidates who successfully pass the Part 3 examination are entitled to register as an
architect in the UK (ARB Registration) and to apply for worldwide corporate membership of
the Royal Institute of British Architects. The term architect is a protected title and can only
be used by ARB registered architects. Once you have registered with the ARB you can
practice as an architect. However, concomitant with full professional status is the
requirement to pay an annual registration fee to the ARB and to comply with the
professions code of conduct and to maintain and develop professional skills (CPD). See
www.arb.org for further details.
2.3 This guide aims to give you advice on a range of issues that face you when you are
contemplating taking the Part 3 examination. Questions such as, am I eligible, when and
where can I take the examination, what does the examination consist of, do I have all the
necessary material ready for submission and to a satisfactory standard?
2.4 The guide also makes some suggestions on how you might work with your fellow Part
3 candidates to further your understanding and test your knowledge of important topics
that you will encounter in the examination.
2.5 Reading around the subject is important to establish basic knowledge. Solving
problems in architectural practice very often has no right and wrong answer so it is also
important to read widely, keep abreast of current trends and form your own opinions.
Appendix 3 provides you with an indicative reading list.
Page 4
3. Part 3 at a Glance
Page 5
Page 6
4. Eligibility
4.1. You are eligible to take the Professional Practice Examination only if you have gained
ARB and RIBA Parts 1 and 2.
4.1.1. You must be able to provide documentary evidence that you have gained RIBA and
ARB Parts 1 and 2 from a prescribed school of architecture or directly from the ARB.
4.1.2. If you obtained your Part 2 overseas through a CAA or an RIBA recognised school
abroad you will not be eligible to take the Part 3 examination. You will need an individual
assessment by the ARB to gain ARB Part 1 and Part 2 before you can take the Part 3
examination.
4.1.3. For further clarification of these requirements, click on the following websites:
www.arb.org and www.riba.org
4.2. Additionally, to be eligible to take the Professional Practice Examination you must
have gained the prescribed period of practical experience (a minimum of 24 months
practical experience, at least 12 months post-Part 2, by the time you sit the exam). The
ARB specify that candidates have:
"completed at least two years practical training experience working under the direct
supervision of an architect registered in the EU,12 months of which must be undertaken in
the UK, under the direct supervision of a UK-registered person. A minimum 12 months of
the pre-requisite training experience must be undertaken after completion of [Part 2]."
(Paragraph 13a of the ARBs General Rules)
4.2.1. If you are currently working abroad and not working under the supervision of an EU
registered architect (e.g. in the USA) the above rule will not apply retrospectively, as long
as you have 12 months UK experience and you were working under the supervision of
someone established as an architect within the country you were working (e.g. registered
by a state licensing authority).
4.2.2 If you are in any doubt about experience obtained outside the EU, please contact
ARB direct who will advise you accordingly.
4.2.3. As far as ARB is concerned, freelance work is acceptable so long as arrangements
are in place for the work to be supervised by a registered architect. Provided that the
Professional Studies Adviser is satisfied that the supervisory arrangements are sufficient,
then ARB is generally willing to agree with the decisions of the individual Department PSAs
on this matter.
4.2.4. The ARB will accept evidence of Professional Studies experience other than the
PEDR in exceptional cases.
4.2.5. Mature candidates with 5 years or more experience, who have studied part-time or
just delayed taking the Examination, can use Certificates of Professional Experience
(covering a 6-year period) as an alternative to the detailed PEDR (covering 2 years). They
are obtainable from the RIBA Education Department.
4.2.6. The ARB will also accept a wider variety of evidence of Professional Studies on a
case by case basis. ARB should be contacted at www.arb.org for advice on individual
cases for exemption from the PEDR.
Page 7
5. Readiness
5.1. The Part 3 examination presents a series of challenging assessments and
examinations, devised to test your professional knowledge, skill and judgement and your
understanding of the requirements of professional conduct.
5.2. The experience that you record in your PEDR sheets should show a gradual
accumulation of knowledge and understanding of architectural practice and management
issues.
5.3. The case study should illustrate your ability to handle the many complex situations that
occur in practice in a professional way.
5.4. Preparation for the examination is paramount and adequate time should be set aside
to investigate thoroughly topics that are likely to occur in the exam. Time spent at this
stage is a worthwhile investment now and in your future career.
5.5. But perhaps the most important factor is your own confidence and conviction that you
are ready to take the Part 3 examination. Only you will know when that time has arrived.
5.6. Examiners will allow for a certain amount of nervousness but they must be convinced
that you have the self-assurance to act properly under pressure and in the best interests of
all the parties involved.
Page 8
6. Application
6.1. Your Application Form must be completed and sent in no later than 31st January of
the year of Examination. The Professional Studies Adviser will look at this carefully to
determine your readiness to take the Examination and may accept or reject your
application.
6.2. An annual fee is charged for the examination which covers:
Please note that the Oxford Brookes Part 3 Examination is not a taught programme and
does not provide you with an academic award.
Page 9
7. Preparation
7.1. The aim of your preparations is to enable you to demonstrate, within the terms of the
Part 3 examination, the levels of knowledge, skills, experience and competencies required
for entry into the architectural profession.
7.2. The basic groundwork for the Part 3 examination should have begun in the practice
and management component of your Part 1 programme and then extended in the practice
and management component of your Part 2 programme.
7.3. Additionally, your practical experience, pre and post Part 2 (see 4.2 for details), will
have provided you with an opportunity to relate theory to practice and giving you firsthand
insights into job-running, office management etc.
7.4. As soon as your application to take the Part 3 examination has been accepted you
should begin to prepare your Case Study and Personal Statement.
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
10.
The Examination
10.0.1. The scope and content of the Part 3 Examination in Practice and Management are
designed to align with the RIBA Description & Regulations for the Recognition of Courses
and Examinations in Professional Practice and Management (Part 3) in the United
Kingdom (2003) and the RIBA Criteria for Validation. Both documents are available in
digital form from the RIBA website (www.riba.org/go/RIBA/Also/Education_460.html)
10.0.2. Your attention is also drawn to the following summary of the Department's
requirements and arrangements for the Examination.
10.0.3. The purpose of the Examination is to test not only your skill and knowledge but also
your experience and judgement, regarding the organisation and management of
architectural practice, the design and procurement of buildings and the operational
relationships between the architect, client, associated professions, statutory authorities and
the building industry.
10.0.4. In essence, you will be examined on your knowledge of professional practice, your
ability to apply that knowledge in practice, and the quality of the professional judgement
you exhibit in so doing. This will be the result not only of your academic and office
experience, but also of your own private study during this time.
10.0.5. The minimum standard of the examination and assessment at Part 3 is that of an
ordinary, competent practitioner exercising a duty of skill and care that is deemed to be
reasonable for an architect working on buildings of medium complexity at the outset of their
professional career. This minimum standard is defined by the Part 3 Criteria (see Appendix
2).
10.1. Requirements
10.1.1. The requirements for Part 3 fall into three sections and each carry the following
marks:
Section 1
Documentary Submission
Personal
Statement
10
PEDR/pract
ical
experience
10
Section 2
Written Examinations
Case Study
20
Paper A
10
Paper B
30
Section 3
Oral
Examination
Interview
20
10.1.2. The overall pass mark is 50% and you should note that all the marks are subject to
moderation (up or down) until ratified by the final Examination Committee.
10.1.3. You must achieve pass level in all of the elements to pass the Part 3. examination.
Page 13
Your C.V.
10.3.2. The analytical account should include a summary sheet and an outline of the
structure of the principal offices in which you have worked i.e. size, sole proprietor, limited
liability company or limited liability partnership, or multi or single discipline. The bulk of the
text should be focused on a critical self-appraisal.
10.3.3. The critical self-appraisal of your architectural education and practice experience
can cover all aspects of your training in offices, including work outside the recorded PEDR
sheets, or the 24 months. The Examiners are aware that nobody is perfect and so you
should be candid about your strengths and weaknesses vis a vis the development of the
knowledge skills and competencies outlined in the Part 3 Criteria (see Appendix 2)
10.3.4. The CV is a short, two page chronology of historical facts about your career. This
gives the Examiners some framework with which to comprehend your career but they are
primarily interested in your critical self-appraisal.
10.3.5. An A4 format is preferred for the Personal Statement and the text should not
exceed 1,500 words, typed and illustrated with photographs and drawings. Page and
paragraph numbers are essential throughout your Personal Statement for ease of
reference in conversation with the examiner.
Page 14
Page 15
Paper A
10.5.6. This consists of about 40 questions requiring short answers for which 2 1/4 hours,
including reading time, are allowed. The paper, therefore, requires quick, concise
responses. No books may be taken into Paper A.
10.5.7. It is intended that answers should extend up to a maximum of 50 words and
demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of each topic.
10.5.8. Copies of your examination script will be sent to you, during the week following the
Examination.
10.5.9. The paper is structured into various areas of practice, such as contracts, law,
planning acts, building regulation control, health and safety, practice management, project
management, design team and building industry, building terminology, and
professionalism. The learning outcomes that will be assessed are indicated in Appendix 2.
Paper B
10.5.11. This is an open-book examination and you may bring a maximum of 5
unannotated texts (including web material) to inform your answers.
10.5.12. No notes may be brought.
10.5.13. You should be prepared to choose a suitable contract for the paper and give your
reason for your choice.
10.5.14. This scenario-based paper outlines an imaginary practice situation to which all the
questions will relate.
10.5.15. Paper B has four sections. Candidates are required to answer one question from
each section and one additional question from any section making a total of five questions.
One section will require the answer to be in the form of a letter.
10.5.16. Paper B will be 3 hours in duration.
10.5.17. A suggested use of time within that period is:
10.5.18. Copies of your examination script will be sent to you, during the week following
the Examination.
10.5.19. The learning outcomes that will be assessed are indicated in Appendix 2.
Page 16
10.6.3. It is particularly important that you ensure that your professional training is
monitored at the time it happens, both by your Office Supervisor and by your Professional
Studies Advisor, by sending in your sheets at 3-month intervals.
10.6.4. Examiners are quick to notice when sheets are signed a long time after the event
and if you find yourself in this position, you should send in all your sheets up to date
without further delay so that you can show that at least from that point on, your training is
being properly supervised.
10.6.5. In addition to serving as a diary, your entries need to be critical, to point to
particular learning experiences.
The Oral Interview
10.6.6. This is normally held at the Department of Architecture, Oxford Brookes University,
approximately 3 weeks after the Written Examination.
10.6.7.Two Internal Examiners, one of whom may be drawn from the RIBA Register of
Professional Examiners, will interview you, usually for about 45 minutes. Both Examiners
will have marked your oral submission and your examination script.
10.6.8. An External Examiner will sample the oral interviews to ensure that they are
conducted in a manner that is valid, reliable and fair and that standards are appropriate.
10.6.9. All Examiners are current or recent practitioners and most have experience of
examining Part 3 at other Universities.
10.6.10. The Oral Examination is conducted as a professional interview rather than an
interrogation and requires proper preparation.
10.6.11. The Examiners will discuss with you your professional experience as outlined in
the Documentary Submission, your PEDR sheets and your answers to the two written
papers. In assessing your competence, the Examiners are interested in:
10.6.12. In advance of the Oral Examination, therefore, it is essential that you not only
review the answers you gave to the written papers, but also be prepared to discuss the
questions you did not answer.
10.6.13. In addition to this, the Examiners are free to question you on any aspect of the
Part 3 Criteria (see Appendix 2).
10.6.14. You should feel free to contribute questions and observations to the discussion
and to do so in a manner that demonstrates the ethical attitudes and maturity expected of
someone with professional integrity.
Page 17
10.8. Results
10.8.1. The result of the Part 3 Examination, pass/fail, will be handed to you in a sealed
envelope on the day of the Oral Examination, once the internal examination marks have
been ratified by the Examination Committee.
10.8.2. If you have been unsuccessful, we will write you with guidance from your
examiners, as soon as practicable after the examination.
9.9.3. In line with RIBA and University practice, you have a right of appeal against the
decision of the examination Committee. The Appeals procedures are set out in Appendix
4.
10.9. Assistance
10.9.1. If you have any questions or concerns during your preparation for Part 3, please
contact either Steve Race, Professional Studies Advisor on +44 (0) 1865 483195 for
professional advice or Vivien Walker, Professional Training Manager on +44 (0) 1865 483
413 for administrative advice.
10.9.2. The Department Office is located on the third floor of the Abercrombie Building in
the Department of Architecture on the main Oxford Brookes University Campus.
The address for correspondence is:
Vivien Walker
Department of Architecture
Oxford Brookes University
Gipsy Lane Campus
Oxford OX3 0BP
Page 18
Page 19
Create a blog or meet face to face with other candidates in your locality to
debate topical issues.
You could role-play using situations from your respective offices or based on
previous examination questions.
Ask to do some work shadowing in areas where you felt you needed extra
understanding.
11.2.4. Please note that examination papers from previous years examinations and model
answers will be available at the Spring Seminar.
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Appointment of an Architect
Contract Documents
Buildings Acts
Planning Acts.
Identify all the architects powers, duties and certificates; there are about 60 of
them.
The various certificates and other standard documents and the ways in which
they are used.
Nomination of sub-contractors and suppliers and the management of subcontracts. See also NSC1, NSC2 (and 2a), NSC3, NSC4 (and 4a).
Novation of the architects contract for services to the Contractor after Planning
Approval and Building Regulations notice have been given. The architect then
becomes a sub-contractor to the Contractor.
13.2.6. Study the JCT Form with Contractors Design and identify the duties of:
An agent
Page 23
British Standards
Agreement Certificates
Approved Documents
While the technical aspects of these documents are of course vital, for the purpose of
the Part 3 Examination it is important to understand their scope. For example, to what
extent do they apply and what is their effect? Which are mandatory and which are only
for guidance? To what extent do Building Regulations apply at all?
Other Orders
Page 24
Page 25
Palgrave Macmillan,
Jackson and Powell (5th edition, 2002). Professional Negligence (Chapter on Architects and
Engineers), Sweet and Maxwell, London.
Lavers, A. and Chappell, D. (2000) A Legal Guide to the Professional Liability of Architects. (3rd
edition)
Luder, O. (1999). Keeping out of trouble. London, RIBA Publications.
Paterson, F. (1995). Professional Indemnity Insurance Explained. London, RIBA Publications.
Sacker, T. (2001). Practical Partnership Agreements. (2nd ed) Jordans, Belfast.
Speaight, A. and G. Stone. (2004) Architects Legal Handbook, the law for Architects (8th ed)
Butterworth Architecture, Oxford.
Construction Contracts
Birkby, G. and P. Brough, (2002).
Publications, London.
Chappell, D. (2003).
London
(7th ed)
RIBA
Spon Press,
Chappell, D. and V. Powell-Smith (1993). The JCT Design and Build Contract. Blackwell Scientific,
Oxford.
Jones, N. (2004). The JCT Major Project Form. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
Jones, N. (1999). Jones' and Bergman's JCT Intermediate Form of Contract. Blackwell Science,
Oxford.
Keating on Building Contracts 7th Edition by Ramsey, V. and Furst, S. (2001) Sweet and Maxwell,
London.
Lupton, S. (1999). Guide to JCT98. RIBA Publications, London.
Lupton, S. (1999). Guide to MW98. RIBA Publications, London.
Uff, J. (2002). Construction Law. (8th ed) Sweet and Maxwell, London.
Major Project Form Sub Contract and Guidance Notes. RIBA Publications, London.
Property Law
Anstey, J. (1996). Party Walls, and what to do with them. London, RICS.
Anstey, J. (1998). Rights of Light, and how to deal with them. London, RICS.
Anstey, J. (2004). Anstey on Boundary Disputes. London, RICS.
Ball, S. and S. Bell (2000). Environmental Law. (5th ed) Blackstone Press Ltd. London.
(new edition soon)
Page 26
Bickford-Smith, S. and Francis, A. Rights of Light (The Modern Law). Jordans, Bristol.
Bickford-Smith, S. and Sydenham, C. (2004). Party Walls: Law and Practice. (2nd ed) Jordans,
Bristol.
Moore, V. (2002). A Practical Approach to Planning Law. (8th ed) Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Polley, S. (2001). Understanding The Building Regulations (2nd ed) Spon Press, London.
Tricker, R. (2003). Building Regulations in Brief. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford
Dispute resolution
Foskett, D. (2001). The Law and Practice of Compromise. (5th ed) Sweet and Maxwell, London.
Harris, Planterrose and Tecks. The Arbitration Act 1996. (3rd ed) Blackwell Science, Oxford in
conjunction with the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators.
Marshall, E. (2001). Gill: The Law of Arbitration. (4th ed) Sweet and Maxwell, London.
Nesie, M. and Boulle, L. (2000). Mediation: Principles, Process and Practice. Butterworths Law,
London.
Redmond, J. (2001). Adjudication in Construction Contracts. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
Health and Safety
Billington M.J., Anthony Ferguson and A.G. Copping (2002).
Illustrated Guide to the Law. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
An
CDM Regulations Work Sector Guidance for Designers. (CIRIA Report 166). CIRIA, London
Designing for Health and Safety in Construction. (1995) Construction Industry Advisory Committee.
HSE Books.
A Guide to Managing Health and Safety in Construction. (1995) Construction Industry Advisory
Committee. HSE Books.
Health and Safety for Small Construction Sites. (1995) Construction Industry Advisory Committee.
HSE Books.
Management of Health and Safety at Work. Regulations 1999 and Approved Code of Practice.
(1999) HSC. HSE Books.
Managing Construction for Health and Safety. Construction Design and Regulations 1994 and
Approved Code of Practice and Guidance. HSE (2001) HSE Books.
Joyce, Raymond (ed) (2001) The CDM Regulations Explained. Thomas Telford.
Penton, John (1999) Disability Discrimination Act: Inclusion. London, RIBA Publications.
Appointment and Procurement
The Architect's Contract, Guide to Forms of Appointment, 2004 revisions, RIBA Enterprises Ltd.
Small Works, SW/99 updated April 2004, RIBA
Conditions of Engagement for the Appointment of an Architect, CE/99 updated April 2004, RIBA
Standard Form of Agreement for the Appointment of an Architect, SFA/99 updated April 2004, RIBA
A Client's Guide to Engaging An Architect, May 2004, RIBA Enterprises
Craig, R. (1999). Procurement Law. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
Page 27
Page 28
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Interview *
Professional Experience
Development Record (PEDR)
Examination Paper B
Case Study
Personal Statement
* Examiners have the opportunity in the interview to ensure that all learning outcomes have been met by focusing
their questions on the areas where the candidate has shown weakness in the sum of their examined work.
Examination Paper A
A
A
A
A
A
Page 29
Examination Paper B
Professional Experience
Development Record (PEDR)
Interview
Examination Paper A
Case Study
Personal Statement
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Page 30
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Interview
Professional Experience
Development Record
(PEDR)
Examination Paper B
Examination Paper A
Case Study
Personal Statement
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Page 31
Interview
A
A
Professional Experience
Development Record (PEDR)
Examination Paper B
Case Study
Personal Statement
Examination Paper A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
16.13. In no circumstances may answer books, used or unused, be removed from the
examination room. Candidates must not damage or deface any paper or material supplied.
16.14. Candidates must write in ink or use a ballpoint pen, other than when completing a
multiple-choice answer. Sheet (for example, Edpac) or when the instructions state
otherwise.
16.15. Except with the permission of the invigilator, candidates must not communicate with
anyone but an invigilator while the examination is in progress.
16.16. Candidates must not leave the examination room and re-enter, except in an
emergency and with the permission of an invigilator. A candidate who has to leave the
room in an emergency will not normally be allowed to re-enter and continue unless it has
been possible to obtain an escort. Candidates knowing of medical conditions likely to
require them to leave the examination room during an examination should notify the
Programme Manager.
Page 33
Page 34
the assessment was not conducted in accordance with the regulations for the
programme; or
there was a material administrative error or some other material irregularity in the
conduct of the assessment, such that the assessment decision would have been
different had the error or irregularity not occurred.
17.10. If, in the opinion of the Chair of the Examination Committee, having consulted with
such members of the Examination Committee as she/he considers appropriate, the case
put forward by the candidate is well founded, he/she shall determine what, if any
modification of the assessment decision shall be made, within the conditions set out in the
programme regulations, and shall take any steps necessary to implement the decision and
to inform the candidate of the decision, in writing, within twenty-one working days of the
appeal. The Chair shall report the decision to the next Examination Committee and next
Examination Management Committee.
17.11. If the Chair of the Examination Committee considers that the case put forward is
without substance he/she shall reject it and inform the candidate in writing, with reasons,
within twenty-one working days of the receipt of the appeal. The Chair of the Examination
Committees decision is final and the candidate shall have no further rights of appeal.
Complaints
17.12 If candidates feel that they would like to submit a complaint about any part of
procedures for the Part 3 Examination then they should do so by letter to the Head of the
Department of Architecture and he/she will normally respond within ten working days.
Page 35
18.
18.1. Authority
18.1.1. The Part 3 Examination in Practice and Management regulations follow those set
out in the RIBA Description and Regulations of Courses and Examinations in Professional
Practice, (Part 3) in the United Kingdom (2003). In addition, the operational workings of
these regulations, described below, are derived from those established for academic
awards within Oxford Brookes University.
18.2. Conditions for admission
18.2.1. See section 3 above.
18.3. The Examination Committee
18.3.1. The Examination Committee is responsible for maintaining the academic standards
of the examination.
18.4. Membership
18.4.1.The examination committee shall include the following members:
The Chair of the Examination Committee: The Head of the Department or his/her
nominee.
compiling and moderating final examination results which they shall have no power
to alter save as provided for in the Regulations for the Review of and Appeals
against a Decision of an Examination Committee (see 4 Appendix above);
18.6. Proceedings
18.6.1.The Examination Committee shall establish its own standing orders including
provision for; the taking of decisions between regular meetings and reporting them to the
next regular meeting; making suitable arrangements for recording its decisions and the
factors taken into account in reaching them. These records shall normally remain
confidential.
18.7. Duties and powers of the External Examiner(s)
18.7.1. The external examiner is a member of the examining team, charged with reviewing
the assessment of candidates examination performance, to ensure the maintenance of
quality and standards in the assessment process and fair and equitable treatment of
Page 36
candidates. The external examiner will monitor the assessment process and provide a
perspective that places the provision and its assessment in a framework of the RIBA/ARB
prescribed standards for Part 3.
18.7.2. The duties and powers of the External Examiner(s) shall be in accordance with their
rights and responsibilities as laid down for the time being by the Academic Regulations of
the University in the Policy for External Examining of Undergraduate and taught
Postgraduate
Programmes
at
Oxford
Brookes
University
(http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/asd/registry/ExternalEx/exrole1.html)
except in the
case where a conflict arises between this policy and the external examiner role as
described in the RIBA Description and Regulations of Courses and Examinations in
Professional Practice, (Part 3) in the United Kingdom (2003), in which case RIBA
regulations take precedence.
18.7.3. In addition external examiners shall have specific functions in relation to the
examination, including:
the right to report directly to the Vice-Chancellor on matters of major concern that
pose a serious risk to the quality and standards of the Examination if serious issues
are not satisfactorily addressed by the Head of Department (or nominee).
PEDR/practical
experience
Case
Study
10
10
20
Section 2
Written
Examinations
Paper A
Paper B
Interview
10
20
30
Section 3
Oral Examination
18.10.2. In the event of failing the Part 3 Examination, candidates whose Case Study
element has achieved a pass may re-present it for no more than two further calendar years
after first sitting the Examination. A new case study will be required after this time.
18.11. Compensation for failure of assessment
18.11.1. There is no compensation permitted.
18.12. Appeals against Examination Committee Decisions
18.12.1. See Appendix 4 above.
18.13. Illness or other Exceptional Circumstance
18.13.1. If by reason of his or her own illness or other cause beyond his or her control,
found valid on production of evidence acceptable to the Examination Committee, a
candidate whom is unable to complete the whole or part of the examination, or having
completed it has not reached the required standard, the Examination Committee shall
exercise discretion in a manner appropriate to the case. Normally such a candidate shall
be reassessed in the normal way at the earliest opportunity. Alternatively the Examination
Committee may prescribe whatever form of assessment it considers suitable for the
circumstances.
18.13.2. If it is established to the satisfaction of the Examination Committee that a
candidate's absence, failure to submit work or poor performance in all or part of an
assessment was due to illness, or other cause found valid on production of acceptable
evidence, the candidate concerned has the right to be reassessed as if for the first time in
any or all of the elements of assessment, as specified by the Examination Committee.
18.14. Disability
18.14.1. If a candidate is unable, through disability, to be assessed by the normal methods,
examiners may vary the methods as appropriate and in accordance with the University's
Regulations Governing Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Disabled Students on the
matter, bearing in mind the objectives of the examination and the need to assess the
candidate on equal terms with other candidates.
18.15. Penalties for Late Submissions
18.15. The deadline for the Documentary Submission is strictly enforced. Work submitted
late, without the prior submission of a medical certificate from your doctor or other valid
documented reason, will not be accepted.
18.16. Assessment Criteria
18.16.1. When awarding marks for the elements of the examination the internal examiners
will be assessing the extent to which the specific Part 3 criteria for that component (see
Appendix 2) have been met.
18.17. Cheating
18.17.1. Candidates must ensure that work submitted for assessment is genuinely their
own and is not, or has not been submitted by themselves for credit elsewhere. Candidates
must also ensure their work is not plagiarised (borrowed, used without specific permission
acknowledged, or stolen from other published or unpublished work). Work, which is proven
to be plagiarised, will receive a 0% assessment. Quotations and paraphrasing should be
clearly identified and attributed to the original author, using one of the standard conventions
for referencing. Assessed work should not be completed or submitted as a joint effort
unless agreed by the Professional Studies Advisor. Such co-operation is considered as
Page 38
syndication and any such communality of text is considered cheating and will not be
accepted.
18.17.2. Oxford Brookes University has strict rules to ensure that candidates' work for
assessment is actually the result of their individual effort, skills and knowledge and has not
been produced by means that will give an unfair advantage over other candidates.
18.17.3. All assessments are intended to determine the skills, abilities, understanding and
knowledge of each of the individual candidates undertaking the assessment. Cheating is
defined as obtaining an unfair academic advantage and any candidate found using any
form of cheating, attempting to cheat or assisting someone else to cheat you will be failed
in the relevant component by the Examination Committee..
18.17.4. The Universitys regulations define a number of different forms of cheating,
although any form of cheating is strictly forbidden. These are:
submitting other peoples work as your own either with or without their
knowledge. This includes copying in examinations; using notes or unauthorised materials
in examinations;
collusion except where written instructions specify that work for assessment may be
produced jointly and submitted as the work of more than one student, you must not
collude with others to produce a piece of work jointly, copy or share another candidates
work or lend your work to another candidate in the reasonable knowledge that some or
all of it will be copied.
duplication submitting work for assessment that is the same as, or broadly similar to,
work submitted earlier for academic credit, without acknowledgement of the previous
submission;
falsification the invention of data, its alteration, its copying from any other source, or
otherwise obtaining it by unfair means, or inventing quotations and/or references.
18.18.3. In line with University practice, candidates have a right of appeal against the
decision of the Examination Committee. The Appeals procedures are set out in Appendix 4.
Notes
Page 40