Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Mariam
(pseudonym)
Client Background
The Treatment
sensory based.
Characterized By:
National dysphagia diet (NDD) level 1 at the initiation of treatment and level 2 at
3rd month of treatment.
Outcomes
Tools Utilized
The efficacy of oral sensorimotor interventions was shown to be 15% above the level of maturation
in children with cerebral palsy and moderate dysphagia (Gisel, 2008).
Implications/Further Research:
o Clinicians need to evaluate the effects within a controlled treatment
design to determine the efficacy of the treatment because the EBP
results are mixed.
o Sensorimotor treatment should not be implemented in isolation and a
team approach is strongly recommended.
o Most of the research has been on children with cerebral palsy and
more research is needed on a variety of populations such as on
children with cranial facial anomalies and various genetic syndromes.
Visual, verbal, and tactile cues were utilized to decrease holding of liquids and solids.
Regular
A lip blocker was used to prevent the insertion of the straw too far into the mouth
to discourage tongue thrust.
Goals of Therapy:
NDD Level 3
NDD Level 1
Patient History:
NDD Level 2
Mixed
Arvedson, Clark, Lazarus, Schooling, & Frymark made a systematic search of relevant peer-reviewed
literature and they found there was insufficient evidence to determine the effects of oral-motor exercises
on children with sensorimotor dysphagia (2010).
Sheppard found that the research suggests that oral preparation, oral initiation, and the pharyngeal
phase may be improved by oral sensorimotor therapy, but the treatment affects appear to be specific
for individual strategies. Improved treatment outcomes can occur when considering the structure and
relevance of the practice activity in advancing the childs skills (2005; 2008).
The majority of published studies support the use of oral-motor therapy for children with neuromotor
difficulties, however, few case studies have investigated the use of oral-motor treatment techniques for
children with low muscle tone, autism, or cognitive impairment (Manno, Eicher, & Kerwin, 2005).
An interdisciplinary team approach that incorporates an oral, motor, medical, and behavioral approach
is a necessity to treat children with dysphagia (Roche, 2011).
References
Arvedson, J., Clark, H., Lazarus, C., Schooling, T., & Frymark, T. (2010). The effects of
oral-motor exercises on swallowing in children: An evidence-based systematic
review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52(11), 1000-1013.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03707.x
Gisel, E. (2008). Interventions and outcomes for children with dysphagia.
Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 14(2), 165-173.
doi: 10.1002/ddrr.21
Manno, C.J., Fox, C., Eicher, P. S., & Kerwin, M. E. (2005). Early oral-motor interventions
for pediatric feeding problems: What, when and how. Journal of Early and
Intensive Behavior Intervention, 2(3), 145-159. Retrieved from
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ846764.pdf
Roche, W. J., Eicher, P. S., Martorana, P., Berkowitz, M., Petronchak, J., Dzioba, J., &
Vitello, L. (2011). An oral, motor, medical, and behavioral approach to pediatric
feeding and swallowing disorders: An interdisciplinary model. SIG 13 Perspectives
on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia), 20(3), 65-74.
doi: 10.1044/sasd20.3.65
Sheppard, J. J. (2005). The role of oral sensorimotor therapy in the treatment of
pediatricdysphagia. Perspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders
(Dysphagia), 14(2), 6-10. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2008/022)
Sheppard, J. J. (2008). Using motor learning approaches for treating swallowing and
feeding disorders: A review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,
39(2), 227-236. doi: 10.1044/sasd14.2.6