Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
New York, NY, February 17, 2010 – A New York father is filing a petition before the United
Nations in New York City on Monday, February 22, 2010, at 2 PM seeking the return of his two
children seized from him by the State of New York (See petition attached to release).
Denominated as a “Petition Charging Diverse Human Rights Violations,” the voluminous
document calls upon the authority of various treaties which prohibit cruel and inhumane
practices by governments in respect to parents and their children.
Leon Koziol, a veteran civil rights attorney and father of two is challenging what he calls an
“antiquated oppressive and gender biased custodial institution of child rearing in New York State
which fleeces mainstream parents of their hard earned resources while alienating children
permanently from their parents.”
Mr. Koziol’s six and eight year old daughters were systematically removed from him during an
arbitrarily prolonged custody case in recent years after he began speaking out against oppressive
child control laws in New York, Washington, D.C. and Massachusetts. He has never been
accused or found to be an unfit parent. His children were featured during parades and campaign
events in his 2006 and 2007 run for state Senate and county executive.
Last week, Mr. Koziol was informed that his law license was suspended as a result of his non-
payment of child support, an act of civil disobedience which has been compared to that of Susan
B. Anthony, Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. Seven months earlier, Mr. Koziol was
deprived of all reasonable contact with his children in response to his premature exit from a
courtroom. That exit was in protest to retaliatory practices orchestrated against him for his legal
positions, logical human demeanor and public views. According to the attorney-father, it was an
abusive process focused not upon the interests of his children but revenue generating interests of
the state and child alienation practices typical of New York’s dysfunctional form of child
governance.
Attorney Koziol, who remains licensed in federal court, is taking aim upon a multi-billion dollar
child industry in America which he cites as a principal cause behind declining productivity and
increased health care costs across the nation. Joined by a group of similarly victimized fathers
with representative cases featured in the U.N. Petition, Mr. Koziol hopes to secure the return of
his children in a manner that parallels the ordeals of David Goldman and Elian Gonzalez.
The National League of Fathers, Inc. is a civil rights organization which advocates for the rights
of both male and female non-custodial parents. Mr. Koziol serves as Legal Counsel to the
organization. For more information contact: (315) 507-6287 or Mr. Koziol directly at (315) 796-
4000.
###
UNITED NATIONS
CONVENTIONS
ON HUMAN RIGHTS
**********************************
John Parent, individually and on behalf of
his natural born children, Child “A” and
Child “B”, and on behalf of parents PETITION CHARGING
similarly situate in the United States of DIVERSE HUMAN RIGHTS
America, VIOLATIONS
Petitioners,
-vs-
Respondents.
***********************************
To: Secretariat of the United Nations
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
inhuman treatment inflicted by government agents of the State of New York, hereinafter
1
(2) In conformity with the practice of sister states and territorial possessions
of the United States, the State effectively and systematically removes countless children
from the care and control of their natural parents in order to exploit them for money
generating purposes. It has become the engine behind a multi-billion dollar child
industry in America.
rationalizes the State’s abduction and ransoming of children with such terminology as
“child support”, parental “visitation” and a so-called “best interests of the child”
standard for determining a “relatively more fit” parent for “child custody” purposes.
cooperative childrearing arrangements, are forced into a State sponsored child control
institution through a scheme of laws that unnecessarily places children above those
maintaining a joint household are nevertheless incited to separate from one another in
aggravated fashion by the State’s imposition of a superior status and monetary award
for the parent who is best capable of denigrating or destroying the other parent in a
(5) In short, children are functionally seized and ransomed to good and
mainstream parents who are forced to fight over them in public arenas known as family
and divorce courts. It is a barbaric war for those parents who love their children the
2
most. This modern day war is created by financial enticements and a generalized fear
instilled in the adult litigants of losing their children in any “custody” process.
(6) United States Census Bureau reports continue to demonstrate that the
statistically predominant victims of this barbaric practice are the male parents and
Constitution and related human rights documents. Others have been compelled to take
the law into their own hands due to the lack of meaningful recourse, leaving the
children often times parentless or scarred for life. This, in turn, produces disrespect for
authority, aggravated criminal activity and a wide range of social ills in the general
(7) The current Petition contains the representative cases which demonstrate
the barbaric nature of this child control practice. Each case has worked its way through
the State’s domestic court systems only to become exhausted or grounded by the ever
depleted. The parents become effectively enslaved to a child industry that breeds and
JURISDICTION
considerations are addressed here to support the jurisdiction of the United Nations and
its pertinent Committees to receive and deliberate upon this Petition. Each named
3
treaty carries with it crucial responsibilities to rectify an escalating crisis in human
(9) The individual and joint petitions which follow present a representative
fact pattern to verify widespread human rights violations that fall well within the broad
scope and purpose of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
have been made victim to the above referenced barbaric government process.
government’s child control institution. The cash component of these awards can easily
exceed a half-million dollars over the lifetimes of mainstream obligors and they
are regularly exploited for non-child related purposes such as drug abuse, gambling,
these fraudulently procured awards comprise socialist welfare entitlements that benefit
lawyers, bureaucratic agents, forensic specialists and non-parties, to the detriment of the
(12) More damaging from a human rights perspective, such “custody” and
“child support” awards are executed in a a manner which immediately, or over time,
permanently separates both fathers and mothers from their natural offspring. Children
4
are ransomed and exploited to spy and report upon their parents’ private and intimate
(13) A full range of violations are presented here to implicate the provisions
of CCPR Articles 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25 and 26.
Counterpart rights envisioned by the United States Constitution are asserted under
Exhibit “A” in a document entitled “Petition” in paragraphs 103 through 122. Their
violations are incorporated into this Complaint and are best explained by resort to the
for money generating purposes. The relevant tribunals are inherently biased and
support orders.”
entities that in effect comprise State owned banking institutions. Victim litigants are
childrearing matters to parents and their families due to the expedited nature of these
mass produced orders, even where no harm or conflict may be occurring. The blanket
5
and mandatory imposition of these “support” orders are accordingly both oppressive
and discriminatory.
(16) Following the needless intrusions, the State burdens itself beyond any
rational capacity for fairly considering the countless and escalating levels of domestic
relations controversies cultivated by the State itself to satisfy money generating laws.
Simply stated, recourse is frustrated by a judiciary ill equipped to fill the self-appointed
courts.
(17) The events described in this Petition fall squarely within the additional
scope and purpose of the Convention Against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or
of children by the State and persons acting under color of law produce psychological
torture of the most calculated and heinous variety among parents and their children.
(18) The events described in this Petition further implicate jurisdiction over
the cited human rights violations found under the Convention on the Elimination of All
are not predominantly those applicable to women, but rather those invidiously applied
6
(19) It is assumed that the United Nations recognizes human rights violations
of this variety to avoid the conclusion that only women can be the victims of
therefore, rely upon the assumption that the elimination of discrimination contemplated
by this Committee and its authoritative treaty is one that applies more effectively to
gender. For at least the past 100 years in the United States, men have comprised a
(childrearing rights).
(20) Jurisdiction is further conferred over this Petition under the Convention
statistically and invidiously the most injured victims of the challenged State practice in
represented fathers named in this Petition to show how egregious this particular
PARTIES
annexed and made a part of this Communication. John Parent is a 23-year licensed civil
rights attorney in New York and the author of this Petition. He is its representative
representation.
7
(22) Petitioner, James Bouras, is a citizen of the United States and former
resident of the State of New York. Due to the violations described in this Petition, Mr.
(23) Petitioner, Alan Cady, is a citizen of the United States with a residence
(25) Petitioner, John Kalil, Jr. is a citizen of the United States with a
PETITIONS
(28) Petitioner John Parent is a civil rights attorney residing in New York
State. Prior to his challenge of the State’s abhorrent domestic relations practices, he had
productive childrearing periods with his natural born infant daughters under a
8
successfully performed parenting (separation) agreement. The subject children are
(29) As a direct consequence of his critical petitions for relief and public calls
for reform, the Petitioner, John Parent, has been denied all functional access to his
daughters, currently aged six and seven years. This occurred initially by court order on
July 30, 2009. That order was vacated on October 28, 2009 but reinstated on November
23, 2009 shortly after the filing and service of a civil rights complaint which named the
presiding judge as a defendant in a separate (sealed) court action. The punitive act of
abducting this Petitioner’s children was executed despite the lack of any allegation,
dysfunction.
public office holder was further impaired for the same reason when he became targeted
by the State’s licensing agents. He has been victimized in a myriad of ways, contrary to
over a period of fifty years. A professional resume is appended under Exhibit “B”.
(31) At present, the Petitioner, John Parent, is facing a prison term as a result
accessing his children or maintaining any meaningful relationship with them. These
money payments have been exploited and diverted from their ostensible “child support”
9
purpose to pay for lawyers, litigation costs of all parties and such indirect abuses as a
court papers that he will be compelled to serve a life sentence as these laws have been
oppressively applied to him. He has likened his condition to that of Nelson Mandela.
of a human right described by the United States Supreme Court as the “oldest liberty
interest” recognized under the American Constitution. This interest is the childrearing
right which derives from a time immemorial and the fundamental laws of nature.
furnished before this Committee by way of the copy of state court pleadings annexed
under Exhibit “A”. These pleadings constitute an extraordinary petition for relief after
New York who declared fugitive status during the year 2008 to escape oppression of a
kind similar to that inflicted upon Petitioner John Parent. His current whereabouts are
unknown and he maintains ongoing parti cipation with the State’s domestic relations
10
courts only through his attorney, John Parent, or by way of telephonic conferences and
hearings.
parenting relief, this second representative Petitioner has been denied access to his now
15 year old daughter for a period of two years and continuing. Presently he is facing a
jail term of six months for an alleged non-payment of “child support” orders.
(37) The ordeal of James Bouras is set apart from the common fact pattern
described in Exhibit “A” by his government related commitment to duty in the relief of
victims of Hurricane Katrina in the City of New Orleans. During this period of absence
from his family, the wife and mother of his only child consummated a separation from
him while exploiting the child to turn against the father over time.
(38) The monetary award (child support) and superior parental status (child
to the mother by the State as an incentive to “tax and destroy” the other (typically male)
parent James Bouras. All efforts to reinstate contact with his adolescent daughter upon
his return from duty were met with judge ordered protection devices, public arrest and
(39) Among the egregious examples of abuse occurring within the domestic
child support magistrate to the effect that “unless he (Bouras) is eating air or living in
11
the streets, I (Support Magistrate) want to know how he is supporting himself.” This
denigrating statement was made to buttress the State’s oppressive system of child
(40) After being ousted from his child and home community under threat of
arrest and injury, Petitioner Bouras took up residency outside New York State. He
remains unemployed under a long term disability arising from an automobile accident
which produced black-outs and a surrender of his driving privileges. Monetary support
consequently derives exclusively and piecemeal from family members. Mr. Bouras
(41) Petitioner, Alan Cady, resides in Oneida County, New York. A father
of two, he works the night shift in a blue collar position to satisfy “child support” orders
arising from his divorce in 2005. Such divorce resulted in oppressive “child support”
obligations under Title IV-D of the United States Social Security Act. Such obligations
are routinely overstated and ruthlessly executed among fathers found in the American
states.
(42) Although both formerly married parents were, and remain, duly
employed, self-sustaining, and fully capable of raising their children in co-equal and
proximate households, the State has forced these parents to participate in the
12
childrearing institution described in the Preliminary Statement. The female parent
earns substantially more income than the male parent, however, when applying arbitrary
government formulas, the father is reduced to near poverty status with little incentive to
(43) The particularly oppressive law known as the Title IV-D Child Support
Standards Act (hereinafter “CSSA”) was exploited to cause Mr. Cady to become
partially deficient in the one-sided and gender biased “child support” orders. An
imprisonment which has been held over the Petitioner’s head since its earliest
(44) Two factors set this Petitioner apart from the common fact pattern
surrounding the above two petitions. First, the $1000 arrearage represented a day care
bill for Mr. Cady’s children for time deprived to him as a consequence of the challenged
institution of mandatory “child custody”. The laws which frame this institution possess
a standard enforcement practice of two weekends and two overnights per month which
the father is allowed to parent his children. The term “visitation” is typically employed
as a gender-biased slur inasmuch as mainstream fathers, unlike true prisoners and third
parties, are not “visitors” in their children’s lives. Nevertheless, this slur facilitates the
unbridled infringement of human rights to support the money objectives of the State.
(45) Put another way, fathers and non-custodial mothers across America are
being forced into the indentured service of parental substitutes which they neither
13
authorize nor are they capable of constraining or supporting financially. They are, in
effect, paying for the government process which effectively takes their children from
them. Such indentured service is perpetual and subject to immense exploitation because
time with the father of the exploited children. Any such sharing could result in a
custody transfer and loss of the custodial “child support” (welfare) check. .
imposed the sentence of imprisonment upon Mr. Cady supported her determinations by
from a decision earlier entered against another father on an unrelated “child support”
case.
(47) This gross judicial error was later deemed to be a mere “typographical
error” to overcome the true reason that such orders and jail sentences arise from heavily
Mr. Cady has been featured in community fundraising initiatives and public protests
relating to the prison sentence and child alienation practices sponsored by the State.
Albany, New York when he was awaken from his sleep by armed police officers at 3
a.m. in July, 2007. Empowered by an ex parte order of protection and eviction, these
14
officers immediately removed him from his (former marital) residence without warning
(49) The unannounced invasion of his home and person was based upon a
hastily drafted civil petition filed by the female parent (former wife) at the time in
Albany County Family Court. This petition was rift with fraudulent, malicious and
(50) Based upon this sloppy and contradictory petition, a Family Court Judge
entered an order granting “temporary sole custody” of the parents’ two month old son to
the mother, in effect rewarding her for the perjurious declaration without meaningful,
reasonably available and timely opportunity for the victim to be heard in this fraudulent
the joint financial estate available to both parents for raising their children. However,
the father was uniquely prejudiced due to an immediate and arbitrary social welfare
obligations were exploited to pay for the mother’s share of litigation expenses in effect
making the father a sole financial facilitator for all ensuing government processes. He
was immediately punished for his role through a mere four one-hour “visitation”
15
sessions per month with his boy. Such sessions are commonly applied by the same State
were exploited further by court orders that imposed anger management therapy, costly
psychological reports and state sponsored parenting classes ordered by the Judge during
an ever escalating litigation process. This process was further fueled by privately
retained and state appointed lawyers who routinely feed off of their self-created
and child control, the several lawyers joined in a gender biased practice known as
litigation. The father was regularly served with interim accusatory instruments which
falsely asserted such heinous crimes as rape, assault, false imprisonment and even
animal cruelty as part of a common tactic for securing the aforesaid “custody” and
welfare “award”.
(55) One year following the ex parte sole custody order of August 6, 2007,
when it became evident that the parents’ joint financial resources had been depleted, the
same presiding Judge issued an order, without hearing, which granted the father
unsupervised overnight parenting periods of three successive days per week with his
16
infant son. This was granted despite failed reports and incomplete parenting sessions
(56) To the time of this Petition, presented before this body in December,
2009, more than one year after this latest parenting order, there has been no incident or
evidence to show any parenting issues or indication that this Petitioner is anything but a
fit father. The arbitrary reversal in treatment comprised a real life declaration that all of
the escalating accusations and forensic processes bore no connection to any genuine
(57) Petitioner, John Kalil, is the Director of the National League of Father,
Inc., a non-profit foundation of parents seeking reform to the State’s domestic relations
practices. He has appeared with John Parent on national radio programs and public
rallies in New York and Washington D.C., among other cities. He is a divorced father
(58) This Petitioner asserts a fact pattern set apart from the foregoing
against the father in “child support” calculations. Mr. Kalil is required to pay the
amounts chargeable for his highest income years regardless of downturns in the
17
(59) The oppressive process is made possible by the State’s further arbitrary
remand of Mr. Kalil to sub-class human status known as a “non-custodial parent”. This
remand occurs regardless of his petitions for equal or shared parenting rights and his
lowest class status is maintained in order to sustain the aforesaid multi-billion dollar
child industry.
substantially higher than the applicable federal and state formula percentages found
under Title IV-D of the United States Social Security Act (“CSSA”). During certain
which exceeds 100% of his actual income under a regularly exploited stereotype that
committed parents due to the growing level of struggling fathers that are compelled to
“work under the table” at a second or third job simply to avoid incarceration for
violating the draconian “child support” obligations. Under Title IV-D, the states and
territories of the United States are rewarded with massive incentive grants and financial
kick-backs based upon the number and magnitude of “child support” orders mass
(62) The State’s judicial process and collection systems are regularly
18
hard earned income with little or no concern for the quality of parent-child relations or
the damage caused to innocent children. Entire college educations are lost to the
obligations made payable to lawyers and the State as a consequence of this blanket and
second marriage. Two children of an earlier marriage have long achieved the age of
indentured to support payments under the earlier divorce decree to the fully employed
ex-spouse which has severely damaged Mr. Richmond’s ability to support his new
family. The infants’ mother is a stay-at-home parent further injured by this process.
(64) Petitioner has filed several petitions in an effort to free himself or reduce
himself of the earlier imposed obligation. All of these petitions have failed, and
support orders have instead been imposed which ignore the unique and well established
realities of a depressed local economy. In recent months, Mr. Richmond has been
to balance the financial needs of two households. The female parent and children of
this Petitioner has reached the limits of his capacity to sustain further psychological
torture by the State’s callous and barbaric child control practice. As a veteran American
19
soldier serving two tours in Viet Nam in the 1960’s and 1970’s, this Petitioner retains
no-regard for himself. He is wholly committed to his infant children and without the
encouragement and largely volunteer assistance of his attorney, John Parent, the
who has been compelled to seek psychological treatment. He has become dependent
upon alcohol to overcome sleep deprivation and on one occasion, due to paranoia over a
potential arrest or home invasion, Mr. Richmond secured his gun for protection while
seated on his front lawn. Children across America are repeatedly becoming parentless
and psychologically damaged by events manufactured and fueled by the State’s money
(67) Petitioner, Casey Stuckman, resides in the City of Rome, New York and
remains a client of Petitioner, John Parent, in connection with a civil rights claim
pending in the New York State Supreme Court. This claim is provided under Exhibit
“C” and its contents are incorporated as part of the Seventh Petition asserted before this
body.
(68) This Petitioner is representative of the race and gender bias found in the
State’s mistreatment of a single person during a shots-fired incident in the City of Utica,
New York. The Petition is set apart from the others by reason of the egregious nature of
20
(69) Petitioner, Casey Stuckman, was reported by witnesses to local police
incident, Mr. Stuckman was shot by his female partner in the view of neighbors while
on the front lawn of a city home. Despite the report, which clearly delineated the
gender of both the female assailant and male victim, at least ten city police officers
arriving on the scene drew their guns upon the man and not the woman. The female
would-be killer remained at all times in possession of her weapon a short distance from
the victim.
(70) Details of the incident are otherwise provided in the annexed claim.
domestic relations matters to such an extreme that police officers are placing themselves
at risk of harm along with the victims of murder and attempted murder by women.
administrators, both as a civil rights attorney and former city chief counsel, which
A recent pattern of arrests and assaults demonstrates that these, and other reports over a
CONCLUSION
Nations to take appropriate measures for the correction of oppressive, punitive and
discriminatory practices and policies of the State of New York and United States
21
government in matters of domestic childrearing with a particular emphasis upon the
(73) Petitioner, John Parent, requests specific and imminent relief which
would reunite him with his infant daughters. He has been effectively denied all contact
with them since July 6, 2009. Citing the international incident involving a Cuban
father reunited with his infant child, Elian Gonzalas, ten years ago, the Petitioner seeks
a similar reunion in his own native country. Copies of relevant news articles depicting
this Petitioner’s long term challenges to government civil rights abuses are annexed
Respectfully submitted,
Leon R. Koziol, J.D.
Attorney and Counselor at Law
Professional Offices: 1518 Genesee Street
Utica, New York 13502
Telephone: (315) 735-2271
Facsimile: (315) 735-0991
Personal: (315) 796-4000
Dated: December 16, 2009 e-mail: attyleonkoziol@aol.com
22