Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
is funded principally
through a grant of the
SPE FOUNDATION
The Society gratefully acknowledges
those companies that support the program
by allowing their professionals
to participate as Lecturers.
And special thanks to The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical,
and Petroleum Engineers (AIME) for their contribution to the program.
Oilfield Scale:
A New Integrated Approach
to Tackle an Old Foe
Dr Eric J. Mackay
Flow Assurance and Scale Team (FAST)
Institute of Petroleum Engineering
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, Scotland
Eric.Mackay@pet.hw.ac.uk
Society of Petroleum Engineers
Distinguished Lecturer 2007-08 Lecture Season
Outline
1) The Old Foe
a)
b)
c)
d)
Formation
Definition of scale
Water (Ba)
Problems caused
Common oilfield scales
Mechanisms of scale formation
Injection Water
(SO4)
3) Conclusions
Slide 3 of 40
Outline
1) The Old Foe
a)
b)
c)
d)
Formation
Definition of scale
Water (Ba)
Problems caused
Common oilfield scales
Mechanisms of scale formation
Injection Water
(SO4)
3) Conclusions
Slide 4 of 40
Scale deposits
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
Suspended particles
z
z
Slide 6 of 40
quartz grains
Slide 7 of 40
Slide 8 of 40
Examples - Facilities
separator
scaled up
and after
cleaning
Slide 9 of 40
SPE 87459
Formula
Specific
Gravity
Solubility
cold water
other
(mg/l)
Common Scales
barium sulphate
BaSO4
4.50
2.2
calcium carbonate
CaCO3
2.71
14
acid soluble
strontium sulphate
SrSO4
3.96
113
calcium sulphate
CaSO4
2.96
2,090
acid soluble
calcium sulphate
CaSO4.2H2O
2.32
2,410
acid soluble
sodium chloride
NaCl
2.16
357,000
(insoluble in HCl)
SiO2
2.65
insoluble
HF soluble
60 mg/l in 3% HCl
Sand Grains
silicon dioxide
Exotic Scales:
ZnS, PbS
Slide 10 of 40
Slide 11 of 40
Outline
1) The Old Foe
a)
b)
c)
d)
Formation
Definition of scale
Water (Ba)
Problems caused
Common oilfield scales
Mechanisms of scale formation
Injection Water
(SO4)
3) Conclusions
Slide 12 of 40
Inhibitor placement
z
Slide 13 of 40
Access to Well
Subsea wells
z
difficult to monitor
brine chemistry
deferred oil during
squeezes
well interventions
expensive (rig hire)
squeeze
campaigns and/or
pre-emptive
squeezes
Slide 14 of 40
Ptubing head
wellbore friction
pressure zones
(layers / fault blocks)
damaged zones
Pcomp 1
Presv 1
Shale
Options:
z
z
z
z
Bullhead
bullhead + divertor
Coiled Tubing from rig
Inhibitor in proppant /
gravel pack / rat hole
Fault
Pcomp N
Presv N
Slide 15 of 40
necessary if using CT
deepwater may require 1-2 weeks / treatment
cf. other typical treatment costs of US$50-150 thousand /
treatment
4,000,000
7
6
3,000,000
5
4
2,000,000
3
2
1,000,000
5,000,000
Year
07
20
06
20
05
20
04
03
20
02
20
20
01
20
00
20
99
19
98
19
97
19
96
19
95
19
94
19
93
19
92
19
91
19
90
19
19
89
88
0
19
10
Slide 17 of 40
Slide 19 of 40
EXAMPLE 1
SPE 80252
Slide 20 of 40
EXAMPLE 1
SPE 80252
EXAMPLE 2
SPE 60193
Barium (mg/l)
Dilution line
% injection water
Slide 22 of 40
EXAMPLE 2
SPE 94052
Slide 23 of 40
EXAMPLE 2
SO42Rock
FW
1) Formation water (FW): [Ba2+] but negligible [SO42-]
Slide 24 of 40
EXAMPLE 2
SO42(hot)
IW
2) Waterflood: SO42- rich injection water
displaces Ba2+ rich FW
Rock
FW
Slide 25 of 40
EXAMPLE 2
IW
SO42-
BaSO4
(hot)
Rock
FW
EXAMPLE 2
3000
Ba
Ba (mixing)
SO4
SO4 (mixing)
800
2500
[Ba] (mg/l)
600
2000
500
1500
400
300
1000
200
500
100
0
0
20
40
60
80
0
100
[SO4] (mg/l)
700
Large reduction in
[Ba]
Small reduction in
[SO4]
(SO4 in excess)
Typical behaviour
observed in many
fields
Slide 27 of 40
EXAMPLE 2
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
% seawater
80
100
Slide 28 of 40
EXAMPLE 3
SPE 100516
EXAMPLE 3
Ion Exchange
Rock: 0.038
C
C Mg
Mg
= 0.50
C Ca
C
Ca
Gyda FW (mg/l)
FW: 0.077
IW: 3.2
IW (mg/l)
CCa
Ca in solution
30,185
426
CMg
Mg in solution
2,325
1,368
Ca
Ca on rock
Mg
Mg on rock
Slide 30 of 40
EXAMPLE 3
SO42-
Ca2+
Mg2+
Rock
FW
1) Formation water: [Ca2+] and [Mg2+] in equilibrium with rock
Slide 31 of 40
EXAMPLE 3
IW
SO42-
Ca2+
(hot)
Mg2+
Rock
FW
EXAMPLE 3
IW
SO42-
Ca2+
(hot)
Mg2+
Rock
FW
EXAMPLE 3
IW
SO42-
Ca2+
(hot)
Mg2+
CaSO4
Rock
FW
EXAMPLE 3
35,000
3,500
30,000
3,000
25,000
2,500
20,000
2,000
15,000
1,500
10,000
1,000
5,000
500
0
0
20
40
60
80
Ca
Ca (mixing)
Mg
Mg (mixing)
[Mg] (mg/l)
[Ca] (mg/l)
Large reduction
in [Mg]
No apparent
change in [Ca]
0
100
Slide 35 of 40
EXAMPLE 3
40000
8000
35000
7000
30000
6000
25000
5000
20000
4000
15000
3000
10000
2000
5000
1000
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Ca
Ca (mixing)
Mgl
Mg (mixing)
[Mg] (mg/l)
[Ca] (mg/l)
Large reduction
in [Mg]
No apparent
change in [Ca]
EXAMPLE 3
900
Ba
Ba (mixing)
SO4
SO4 (mixing)
800
2500
2000
[Ba] (mg/l)
600
500
1500
400
1000
300
200
500
100
0
0
20
40
60
80
0
100
[SO4] (mg/l)
700
Small reduction
in [Ba]
Large reduction
in [SO4]
(No SO4 at
< 40% SW)
Slide 37 of 40
EXAMPLE 3
300
3000
250
2500
200
2000
150
1500
100
1000
50
500
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Ba
Ba (mixing)
SO4l
SO4 (mixing)
[SO4] (mg/l)
[Ba] (mg/l)
Small reduction
in [Ba]
Large reduction
in [SO4]
(No SO4 at
< 40% SW)
Slide 38 of 40
3) Conclusions
reservoir description
numerical errors
changes to production schedule, etc.
so monitoring essential.
Slide 39 of 40
Acknowledgements
Slide 40 of 40
Extra Slides
Slide 41 of 40
EXAMPLE G
SPE 80252
a) water saturation
Field G (model)
b) mixing zone
c) BaSO4
deposition (lb/ft3)
Slide 42 of 40
EXAMPLE G
200
3000
2500
2000
Ba
Ba (no precip)
SO4
SO4 (no precip)
150
100
1500
1000
50
500
0
0
Field G (model)
500
1000
1500
2000
250
0
2500
time (days)
Slide 43 of 40
EXAMPLE G
Field B - observed
Filed B - dilution line
200
Field B - modelled
150
100
50
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
% seawater
Slide 44 of 40
EXAMPLE X
Slide 45 of 40
EXAMPLE X
SPE 87459
Placement (Field D)
production
500
400
300
prior to squeeze
shut-in
INJ 1 bbl/m
INJ 5 bbl/m
INJ 10 bbl/m
1 year after squeeze
200
100
0
0
200
400
600
800
-100
injection
(squeeze) -200
well length (m)
EXAMPLE X
SPE 87459
Placement (Field D)
production
100
0
0
200
400
600
-100
prior to squeeze
shut-in
INJ 1 bbl/m
INJ 5 bbl/m
INJ 10 bbl/m
1 year after squeeze
-200
-300
-400
injection
(squeeze)
800
-500
-600
well length (m)