Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
What is proteomics?
Proteomics includes not only the identification
and quantification of proteins, but also the
determination of their localization, modifications,
interactions, activities, and, ultimately, their
function.
-Stan Fields in Science, 2001.
kD
st
d
220160120100908070-
Honeydew
Cantaloupe
Grapefruit
Pear
Apple
60-
Orange
50-
Lemon
40-
Lime
Grape
3025201510-
Cranberry
Blueberry
Dynamic Range
=103
Protein
No amplification
High variability in amount (>109)
protein interactions
Mass
Separation
Ion collection
MALDI
Electrospray
quadrupole
ion trap
time-of-flight
mass analysis
Protein, MW = 10,000 +
N-THK.NCPHIVVGTPGR.IPD-C
digest into peptides
Peptides,
MW < 4,000
R+-COOH
+ NH2
+ NH2
+ NH2
K-COOH
+
K-COOH
+
+NH2
NewObjective
K-COOH
+
UniversityofBristol
matrix
sample
OH
UV laser
3 mm
A laser pulse excites the matrix material at its
resonant frequency and energy is imparted to
peptides, charging them.
Q1
Q2
Q3
microcapillary
electrospray source
Ionization
collision cell
Mass Selection
Detector
Ion Collection
Quadrupole Optics
m/z
N
N
N
N
N
+NSGDIVNLGSIAGR+
b
+N
SGDIVNLGSIAGR+
+NS
GDIVNLGSIAGR+
+NSG
DIVNLGSIAGR+
+NSGD
IVNLGSIAGR+
+NSGDIV
NLGSIAGR+
+NSGDIVN
LGSIAGR+
+NSGDIVNL
GSIAGR+
+NSGDIVNLG
SIAGR+
+NSGDIVNLGS
IAGR+
+NSGDIVNLGSIA
GR+
+NSGDIVNLGSIAG
R+
Y ions
+NSGDIV
NLGSIAGR+
N L GSI AGR
bions
+NSGDIVNLGSIAGR+
yions
+N
+ NS
+ NSG
+ NSGD
+ NSGDI
+ NSGDIV
+ NSGDIVN
+ NSGDIVNL
+ NSGDIVNLG
+ NSGDIVNLGS
+ NSGDIVNLGSI
+ NSGDIVNLGSIA
+ NSGDIVNLGSIAG
+R
+ RG
+ RGA
+ RGAI
+ RGAIS
+ RGAISG
+ RGAISGL
+ RGAISGLN
+ RGAISGLNV
+ RGAISGLNVI
+ RGAISGLNVID
+ RGAISGLNVIDG
+ RGAISGLNVIDGS
bions
yions
-NSGDIVNLGSIAGR-COOH
Relative Abundance
H2N
75
50
R
25
200
400
D
L
600
800
m/z
1000
1200
fragment
peptide
100
Ar
Ar
R e la tiv e A b u n d a n c e
Ar
Ar
ESI
Ar
peptides
trypsin
gel
1. MS survey scan
100
50
600
800
1000
1200
1400
50
1200
200 400 600 8001000
80010001200
m/z
600
tandem
mass1200 spectrum
800
1000
1400
Sample Peptide
100
-NSGDIVNLGSIAGR-COOH
Relative Abundance
H2N
75
50
R
25
200
400
D
L
600
800
m/z
1000
1200
SEQUEST Example
1. An MS/MS scan of m/z 750 and charge 2+ the
molecular weight is 1500 Da
2. SEQUEST searches a protein database starting at the
first amino acid to find all possible peptides that weight
1500 +/- 1.5
3. SEQUEST fragments each virtually and compares to the
experimental spectra.
4. For a good spectra, one peptide stands out from all
others
Scoring a match
NSGDIVNLGSIAGR
NSADIVNLGSIAGR
Acquired
spectra
Theoretical
spectra
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Dotproduct
LTQ-FT
Time of Flight
All ions are imparted with the same energy (E) by the
application of an electric field.
E=mv2/2
m=2E/v2
Distance/time=v
m=2E/(d/t)2
Mass can be calculated based on time of arrival
because the energy, flight tube length, and time are
known.
ESI
ETD
ETD
ETD
Quantitative Proteomics
Why?...Comparisons
Particularly well suited to answering biologic
questions
Detail protein level changes to a biologic stimulus
Used as a tool to evaluate protein distributions
Used as a tool to follow complex formation
light
heavy
Isotopic tags
Label should react with a group common in
proteins
Labeling must be complete
Labeling must be stable
Label cannot inhibit ionization or fragmentation
Label must provide a large enough mass
difference for peaks to be resolved.
Light and heavy peptides should co-elute in all
separation steps preceding mass spectrometry
SILAC
Media w/o Lys and Arg
Heavy
Lysine,
Arginine
or both
Stimulus
of
interest
Control
Lyse cells
together
SILAC
Very simple, grow cells and lyse together.
Dialyzed serum may cause growth issues in some
cell lines
All peptides are labeled- this can challenge the
mass spec duty cycle in some experiments
Not applicable to cells that cannot be easily
propagated i.e. primary cells
Not applicable to samples where propagation is
not possible i.e. mammalian serum or organs
Protein Labeling
Isotopic tagging at the protein level is most
commonly done through cysteine or lysine
modification.
A variety of reactants are available that
incorporate thiol specific chemistry with variable
isotopic tags.
Some are selective
N
S
S
H
Acid cleavage
O
H2N
N
N
O
Peptide
cys
Mixture 1
ICATlabeled
cysteines
Combine and
proteolyze
Mixture 2
Affinity
separation
with Avidin
Peptides
Proteins
ICAT
Selective and therefore reduces complexity
potentially increasing dynamic range
Most proteins have a cysteine
However:
Method involves a variety of handling steps that
can cause sample loss
Parallel cell lysis and handling can introduce
bias.
iTRAQ
iTRAQ (isotope Tags for Relative and Absolute
Quantitation).
Commercially available from ABI
Requires CID to generate reporter ions for
quantitation.
Requires a TOF instrument
iTRAQ schema
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
ITRAQ
Ross, P. L. (2004)
ITRAQ
Ross, P. L. (2004)
Ross, P. L. (2004)
iTRAQ summary
Very effective method for multiplexed
quantitative studies
Trades off increased ID/quantification using
many peptides vs. selection strategy (ICAT)
Is not compatible with LC/MS strategies that
choose CID peaks based on pair intensity ratios
Large scale
Medium scale
Small scale
Big $$$$$$
Peroxisome membrane
We have combined classical subcellular
fractionation with large-scale quantitative
mass spectrometry to identify proteins that
enrich specifically with peroxisomes of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Micro-Proteomics
Focus on a particular protein complex
Affinity based purification
Takes advantage of existing technology
Results more approachable for an individual
investigator
Micro-Proteomics
unknown
known
Release
Identification of
binding partners
Conclusions 1
Proteomics is rapidly advancing:
Relative quantification is here.
Large scale experiments are becoming easier with
better automation tools, BUT they generate vast
amounts of data and consume significant resources.
Medium and small scale projects can be approached by
an individual investigator here and now.
Phosphorylation is observable but methodology is still
under development.
Conclusions 2
Mass spectrometers are fantastic
The results you get out are determined by what you put in.
The results you get out are determined by what you put in
The results you get out are determined by what you put in.
Problems are most often NOT the result of poor instrument
performance
Your results depend on the following:
The purity and cleanliness of you preparation
The complexity of your sample compared to the dynamic range and duty
cycle of the instrument