Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
AbstractVoltage flicker and harmonics are the types of powerquality problems that are introduced to the power system as a result of arc furnace operation. Utilities are concerned about these
effects and try to take precautions to minimize them. Therefore,
an accurate model of an arc furnace is needed to test and verify
proposed solutions to this end.
In this paper, an arc furnace model is developed and implemented in a Simulink environment by using chaotic and
deterministic elements. Moreover, the modeling and simulation of
an IEC flickermeter are also performed to evaluate the severity of
fluctuations in the simulated arc furnace voltage.
Index TermsArc furnace, chaos, Chuas circuit, flickermeter,
harmonics, modeling, Simulink, voltage flicker.
I. INTRODUCTION
voltage has been obtained either from the simplified characteristics of the arc furnace load, or from the empirical formulas related to the arcing process.
In [3], the arc furnace load is modeled as a voltage source,
and the model is based on the characteristics, using the sinusoidal variation of the arc resistance and bandlimited white
noise variation as well. On the other hand, system-identification techniques are used in [1] to estimate the stochastic characteristics of the generated model. Instead of focusing on the
detailed modeling of - characteristics, a simplified characteristic is chosen and the time-dependent variation of the electric
arc voltage dominates the model. Another model, which consists
of the nonlinear, time-varying resistance where both sinusoidal
and stochastic time variation rules of arc length are considered,
is presented in [2].
Making use of the chaos theory in arc furnace modeling [4]
is rather new compared to the stochastic ideas. Actually, chaos
theory has become a modeling issue for arc furnaces after the
electrical fluctuations in the arc furnace voltage were proven to
be chaotic in nature [5].
In this paper, the arc voltage is simulated by solving the corresponding differential equation, which yields dynamic and multivalued characteristics of the arc furnace load. On the other
hand, a low-frequency chaotic signal is generated via simulation of Chuas well known chaotic circuit. These two signals
are modulated to form the final arc furnace terminal voltage.
The proposed model is connected to the system as a controlled
voltage source. Preliminary results of the model development
were presented in [6]. Finally, in order to evaluate the flicker in
the simulated arc furnace voltage, the IEC flickermeter is implemented based on the IEC 1000-4-15 standard [7] in Matlab
environment by using discrete time methods. In this paper, we
show a flicker study using the developed arc furnace and IEC
flickermeter models.
OZGUN AND ABUR: FLICKER STUDY USING A NOVEL ARC FURNACE MODEL
two points diverge from each other with a separation, on the average, increasing exponentially [9].
Researchers have long observed the occurrence of chaotic
components in arc furnace load currents. First, the recent U.S.
Bureau of Mines (USBM) work indicates that the electrical fluctuations in electric arc furnaces may be chaotic in nature. Then,
in another project at USBM, after analyzing the current and
voltage waveforms from an experimental electric arc furnace,
it was proven that the arc furnace electrical fluctuations are indicative of a chaotic system [5].
After recognizing the chaotic responses in electric arc furnaces, the first model based on chaotic dynamics is introduced
in [4]. This model employs chaos as a key element to produce
a chaotic response as close to actual data as possible. The basic
feature of this first chaotic model is that it is self-tuning to adjust
the model parameters in order to match the model output with
the artifact readings. The time-scaled Lorenz system is used to
represent the highly varying behavior of the currents in an electric arc furnace. The scaled Lorenz system is tuned to generate
a time series that matches the given real data as close as possible. In summary, at the end of the simulation, the arc current
data are generated for the selected time interval, and injected to
the arc furnace bus as an ideal current source. While this model
can successfully duplicate the artifact data obtained from a real
arc furnace, for most of the harmonic spectra, it is insensitive
to changes in the network. Also, it should be noted that it is
hard to get real data from each kind of arc furnace installation.
Therefore, it would be desirable to develop a model that can be
connected to any bus in the network as a circuit component, and
requires only conventional data available for arc furnaces.
1159
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Here , which stands for the arc radius, is chosen as the state
variable instead of the arc resistance or the conductance. The
arc voltage is then given by
(2)
where is defined as the arc conductance and given by the following equation:
(3)
It is possible to represent the different stages of the arcing
process by simply modifying the parameters of and in (1).
The complete set of combinations of these parameters for different stages of electric arc can be found in [10]. Here, these
and
, which represent
parameters are chosen as
the refining stage of the electric arc.
Fig. 1 shows the dynamic - characteristics of 250-V, 70-kA
ac electric arc obtained by solving (1) and (2) in time domain.
The simulated characteristics of electric arc match well
with the measured characteristics [10]. The simulated arc
voltage waveform is shown in Fig. 2.
1160
OZGUN AND ABUR: FLICKER STUDY USING A NOVEL ARC FURNACE MODEL
1161
TABLE I
PERFORMANCE TESTING
(5)
where is the weighting coefficient, and is the flicker level
exceeded during a particular percent of the observation time.
These values are taken from the cumulative distribution curve
CPF
(6)
1162
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7. Voltage at the secondary and primary of the arc furnace transformer.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
OZGUN AND ABUR: FLICKER STUDY USING A NOVEL ARC FURNACE MODEL
VI. CONCLUSION
A new model to represent the arc furnace operation has been
introduced. The model provides an arc current with harmonic
spectrum that is consistent with the measured spectrum. It is
built in the time domain and can be readily connected at a specified bus as a circuit component, which takes the system current
as input and assigns the terminal voltage value at each time step
(i.e., it behaves like a controlled voltage source).
Dynamic and multivalued - characteristics are obtained by
solving the corresponding differential equation. In order to represent the flicker effect, a low-frequency chaotic signal is modulated with the arc voltage. The symmetry of the arc - characteristics are therefore destroyed, resulting in even harmonics
as well as odd ones.
To evaluate the flicker severity of the simulated data, the IEC
digital flickermeter model is created in Matlab environment.
Flicker evaluation of the simulated arc furnace voltage waveform is performed using this flickermeter model.
APPENDIX
Parameters of the studied system shown in Fig. 5 are shown
here.
Source: Ideal sinusoidal ac voltage source with
kV and zero phase shift.
amplitude
and inductance,
Zthevenin: resistance,
mH.
Transformer: Three windings linear single-phase transformer.
MVA.
Nominal power:
kV,
Winding 1 parameters:
,
.
V,
Winding 2 parameters:
,
.
Magnetization resistance and reactance:
.
Arc Furnace: (Parameters for corresponding differential
,
,
,
,
equation)
.
nF,
F,
H
(Chuas circuit)
mho.
with a series resistor,
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful discussions
with Dr. M. P. Kennedy of University College Dublin, Ireland,
and Dr. E. Acha of University of Glasgow, U.K. They also
thank J. Soward of Texas Utilities Co. and Dr. R. Iravani and
1163
Omer Ozgun received the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in electrical and electronics
engineering from Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey, in 1995 and 1997, respectively. He is currently pursuing the Ph.D. in the Department of Electrical
Engineering at Texas A&M University, College Station.
His current research involves modeling and simulation of events related to
power quality.
Ali Abur received the B.Sc. degree from METU, Turkey in 1979, and the M.Sc.
and Ph.D. degrees from The Ohio State University, Columbus, in 1981 and 1985,
respectively.
Currently, he is a Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering at
Texas A&M University, College Station, where he has been since 1985. His
current research involves power system state estimation and metering design,
fault identification and location, and modeling and simulation of events related
to power quality.