Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Page 1 of 3
Notes:
If the crime of arson was employed by the offender as a means to kill the offended party ,
the crime committed is murder. The burning of the property as the means to kill the
victim is what is contemplated by the word fire under Article 248 which qualifies the
crime to murder. (People vs. Villarosa, 54 O. G. 3482)
When the burning of the property was done by the offender only to cause damage but the
arson resulted to death of a person, the crime committed is still arson because the
death of the victim is a mere consequence and not the intention of the offender. (People
vs. Paterno, 47 O. G. 4600)
Page 2 of 3
There is no special complex crime of arson with homicide. What matters in resolving cases
involving intentional arson is the criminal intent of the offender.
There is such a crime as reckless imprudence resulting in the commission of arson. When
the arson results from reckless imprudence and it leads to death, serious physical
injuries and damage to the property of another, the penalty to be imposed shall not be
for the crime of arson under P. D. No. 1613 but rather, the penalty shall be based on
Article 365 of the Revised Penal Code as a felony committed by means of culpa.
Destructive Arson, distinguished from simple arson under PD no. 1613
The nature of Destructive Arson is dstinguished from Simple Arson by the degree of
perversity or viciousness of the criminal offender. Destructive Arson are characterized as
heinous crimes. On the ther hand, acts committed uner PD No. 1613 constituting Simple
Arson are crimes with a lesser degree of perversity and viciousness that the law punishes
with a lesser penalty. Simple Arson contemplates crimes with less significant social,
economic, political and national security implications than Destructive Arson.
Attempted, frustrated and consummated arson.
1. A person, intending to burn a wooden structure, collects some rags, soaks them in
gasoline and places them beside the wooden wall of the building. When he is about
to light a match to set fire to the rags, he discovered by another who chases him
away.
The crime committed is attempted arson, because the offender commences
the commission of the crime directly by overt acts but he does not perform all the
acts of execution (setting fire) due to the timely intervention of another who chases
away the offender.
2. If that person is able to light or set fire to the rags but the fire was put out before
any part of the building was burned, it is frustrated. (US v. Valdez)
3. But if before the fire was put out, it had burned a part of the building, it is
consummated.
Any charging of the wood of a building, whereby the fiber of wood is
destroyed, is sufficient. It is not necessary that the wood should be ablaze.
Page 3 of 3