List New2.ASP

MACT No.
115/14
16/04/2015
Present:-
Sh. Mehtab Ali, Father of deceased.

IO Gopi Chand in person.
IO seeks some more time to file the DAR.
Put up for filing of DAR as last and final opportunity on
01/05/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 09/15

16/04/2015
Present:-
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

Verification report received. As per the verification report,
petitioner is residing at the given address.

Issue summons to the respondents on filing of PF/RC.
Respondent no. 2 may also be got served through concerned DJ with
request letter.
Put up for service report of respondents on 08/07/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 16/15

16/04/2015
Present:-

Ld. Counsel for the respondents with respondent no. 1
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent no. 1 and 2. Be
taken on record. More time sought to file the reply / WS.

Put up for WS of respondents on 18/05/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 49/15

16/04/2015
Present claim petition be checked and registered.
Present:-

Let verification report be called from SHO concerned as to
whether petitioners are residing at the given address or not for the next
date of hearing.
Respondent no. 1 & 2 may also be got served through concerned DJ with
request letter.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 50/15

16/04/2015
Present claim petition be checked and registered.
Present:-

Let verification report be called from SHO concerned as to
whether petitioner is residing at the given address or not for the next date
of hearing.
Respondent no. 1 & 2 may also be got served through concerned DJ with
request letter.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
DAR No. 133/12

16/04/2015
Present:-
Sh. Bijay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

Sh. Pushkar Walia, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1 and 2.
Sh. Kunwar Mohd. Rafi, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
Put up for PE on 05/10/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
DAR No. 139/13

16/04/2015
Present:-
None for injured.

None for respondents.
Inspector Yogendra Khokhar in person.
He seeks time to comply with rule 6 of MACT rules and get
the vehicle auctioned as per law.

Put up for further report of SHO P.S Khajuri Khas
on
25/05/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
DAR No.18/14
16/04/2015
Present:-
Injured alongwith ld. Counsel.

An application has been moved for cancellation of NBWs
against the IO. Accident is dated 02/10/2013. Copy of charge sheet has not
been filed alongwith DAR. Today, also IO not present.
Issue fresh NBWs against the IO for 02/05/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
DAR No. 61/15

16/04/2015
Present:-
Injured alongwith ld. Counsel Sh. Indra Bhushan.

Sh. Priyanshu Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1 & 2.
Sh. Vankatesh Kumar Jha, proxy counsel for Ms. Shalini
Upadhyay, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
IO not present.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of Injured. Be taken on record.
IO be called to report as to what action he has taken against the injured as

he was indulged in drunken driving.
Put up on 14/05/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 480/11

16/04/2015
Present:-
Sh. B.K. Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

None for respondent no. 1 and 2.
Sh. Vankatesh Kumar Jha, proxy counsel for Ms. Shalini
Upadhyay, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
More time sought to lead PE.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 55/13

16/04/2015
PW1 Sh. Salim S/o Nasibuddin R/o E-1258/10, Gali No. 9, E Block, Shri
Ram Colony, Delhi 94 (recalled for cross-examination after 15/10/2014)
On SA
XXXXX by Sh. Pankaj Tomar and Gulshan Antal, ld. Counsel for
respondent no. 1
It is correct that I was not present when the accident had taken
place. I have received the phone call from some public person. I have
reached at the spot after 15-20 minutes. I have not saved the mobile
number from which I have received the information regarding the accident.
I have not informed the IO of the case regarding the phone number from
which I have received information. It is correct being father of the
deceased I was sited as a witness in the present case. No public witness
was interrogated by the IO of the case. It is wrong to suggest that I have
not visited the spot where the accident had taken place. The deceased was
accompanying his grandfather (dadaji). My father is aged about 60 years.
It is wrong to suggest that deceased was roaming freely on the road and
was not in the control of his grandfather. It is wrong to suggest that I have
neither received any phone call nor visited the spot. It is wrong to suggest
that accident had occurred due to negligence on the part of respondent no.
1 but the accident had taken place due to the negligence on the part of the
deceased.
XXXX by Sh. N.K. Rathi, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 2
I am 8th class passed. I am having three children at present. I am not
an eye witness to the accident. I know the contents of my affidavit. It is
correct that no person from our family became doctor or engineer till now.
2
It is wrong to suggest that I am deposing falsely or respondents are falsely
implicated in the present case. It is wrong to suggest that I do not know
the contents of my affidavit or that same has been prepared by my counsel
without my intimation.
RO & AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 55/13

16/04/2015
PW2 Sh. Rojuddin S/o Late Sh. Kareemulla R/o H.No. 225, E Block, Gali
No. 2, Shri Ram Colony Rajiv Vihar, Delhi (recalled for cross-examination
after 15/10/2014)
On SA
XXXXX by Sh. Pankaj Tomar and Gulshan Antal, ld. Counsel for
respondent no. 1
I am aged about 58-60 years. The place of accident is about KM
from my house. The accident had taken place at about 3:30 to 3:45 PM. I
do not know the direction from which we were crossing the road. My
grandchild was with me at the time of accident and after seeing the
accident I got busy in taking care of my grandchild. I do not know who
had informed my son Salim about the accident. It is correct that there was
no red light near the spot of accident. The deceased was aged around 10
years on the date of accident. I had not noted down the number of the
offending vehicle as I am illiterate. It is wrong to suggest that the accident
did not occur with the vehicle of respondent no. 1 and 2. It is further
wrong to suggest that my grandchild was running on the road at the time of
accident and therefore, the accident occurred. Vol. We were near the
footpath when the accident occurred and when the motorcycle hit my
grandchild, the child was thrown in the air and fell around at a distance of
8 feet. It is correct that I did not suffer any injury. It is wrong to suggest
that I did not suffer any injury as I was not accompanying the child. It is
wrong to suggest that I am deposing falsely.
XXXX by Sh. N.K. Rathi, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 2
I am illiterate. I do not remember the exact date when my affidavit
2
was prepared by my counsel. I was near the footpath when the accident
occurred. We had not crossed the road. At that time there was not much
rush of traffic when the accident occurred. People from surrounding area
gathered after the accident. I remained at the spot for around 20 minutes
after the accident. Thereafter, persons from my family came at the spot and
took me to the hospital. Public persons took my grand child to the hospital
in a three wheeler. Police reached at the spot in my presence. I do not
know the number of the offending vehicle as I am illiterate. It is wrong to
suggest that I had not told the facts of the case to my counsel before
drafting the affidavit. It is wrong to suggest that I was not present at the
spot and therefore, I had not suffered any injury. It is wrong to suggest
that I have falsely implicated the respondents in the present case.
RO & AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 08/15

16/04/2015
Present:-
Sh. P.K. Sisodia, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

Sh. Amit Tomar, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of Insurance Co . Be taken on
record. Respondent no. 1 not served.

Dasti summons be given and respondent no. 1 be served
afresh on filing of PF/RC for 08/07/2015
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 55/13

16/04/2015
Present:-
Sh. Upender Singh, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

Sh. Pankaj Tomar and Gulshan Antal, ld. Counsel for
respondent no. 1
Sh. N.K. Rathi, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 2.
Sh. Rajneesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent no. 1. Be taken on
record.
PW1 Sh. Salim and PW2 Sh. Rojuddin cross-examined and
discharged. PE stands closed on the statement of ld. Counsel for the

petitioner. It is requested by ld. Counsel for petitioner that DAR filed by
the ld. Counsel be perused.
Put up for RE on 07/07/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 52/14

16/04/2015
PW1 Smt. Usha W/o Sh. Vijay Kumar Goel R/o H. No. 126, Street No. 3,
Tukhmirpur Extension, New Delhi - 110094
On SA
I tender my evidence by way of affidavit which is Ex. PW1/A and bears
my signatures at point A and B. I rely upon the documents which are exhibited
as under:1. Certified copy of charge sheet, FIR, site plan, postmortem report,
Mechanical Inspection report of both the vehicles are Ex. PW1/1 to
PW1/6.
2. Photocopy of educational certificates of Ankur Goel are Ex PW1/7 to
Ex. PW1/23. (OSR). There is no document Ex. PW1/24 and the same
has been inadvertently mentioned in the affidavit.
3. Photocopy of salary certificate issued by DLF Ex. PW1/25 (OSR)
4. Photocopy of appointment letter of DLF Ex. PW1/26 (OSR)
5. Photocopy of appointment letter issued by SMCC Ex. PW1/27 (OSR)
6. Original pay slip of SMCC for the month of Jan Ex. PW1/28.
7. Original pay slip of SMCC for the month of Feb Ex. PW1/29.
8. Photocopy of Election I card Ex. PW1/30 (OSR)
9. Photocopy of Election I Card of Kavita Ex. PW1/31 (OSR)
10. Photocopy of Election I card of Sanchit kumar Ex. PW1/32 (OSR)
Ex. PW1/25 to PW1/29 (objected to on account of mode of proof)
Xxxxx on behalf of respondent no. 1 and 2
Nil, Opportunity given as none appeared.
XXXX u/sec 170 MV Act by Sh. Neeraj Bansal, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
I am not the eye witness and I have not seen the accident. It is correct
that I cannot tell how the accident took place. My other son namely Sanchit is
studying and doing CS. My husband is jobless and remains ill. I got married
2
my daughter Kavita 9 years back. My son worked in DLF for around 1 year.
My son was handing over me the entire salary for expenses of my family. My
son was tax payee and I have filed the documents. I have already filed the
document whatever I have. It is wrong to suggest that my son was not working
as mentioned in para 4 of my affidavit and further it is wrong to suggest that he
was not earning the amount as alleged in my affidavit. My son was highly
educated. It is wrong to suggest that I was not dependent on my son Ankur as
my husband is alive and is working. It is wrong to suggest that I am deposing
falsely for the purpose of getting compensation.
RO & AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 52/14

16/04/2015
PW2 Sh. Surender Kumar Goyal S/o Late Sh. Rattan Lal R/o H. No. 97,
Chander puri, Ghaziabad, U.P.
On SA
I tender my evidence by way of affidavit which is Ex. PW2/A and
bears my signatures at point A and B. I rely upon the photocopy of
document which is exhibited as Ex. PW2/1 i.e DL
Xxxxx on behalf of respondent no. 1 and 2
Nil, Opportunity given as none appeared.
XXXX u/sec 170 MV Act by Sh. Neeraj Bansal, Ld. Counsel for Insurance
Co.
I am in the business of electric goods at 97, Chander Puri,
Ghaziabad. I was with Ankur at the time of accident. Ankur was behind
me as I reached earlier. I came on foot from Bapu Ashram and Ankur was
on motorcycle. The distance between me and Ankur was around 400-500
mtrs. I have seen the accident despite the fact that the accident took place
around at a distance of 400-500 mtrs from the place where I was standing.
Many vehicles were running on the road being highway. Buses do not ply
on that route but the trucks were plying on the road as some construction
work was going on. However, the construction work was not going on at a
place where I was standing. I reached at the spot within 5 minutes. I have
seen the said accident when the truck hit the motorcycle. I have not called
the police as I have not any phone at that time. Police had recorded my
statement on the same day. Police met me twice. Ankur was my nephew.
It is wrong to suggest that I am deposing in favour of petitioner as the
2
deceased Ankur was my nephew. It is wrong to suggest that I have not
seen the accident. It is wrong to suggest that I am deposing falsely.
RO & AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 52/14

16/04/2015
Present:-
Sh. Sudesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

Sh.Neeraj Bansal, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
Affidavit of PW1 Smt. Usha and PW2 Sh. Surender Kumar
filed. WS filed on behalf of Insurance Co. alongwith application u/sec 170

MV Act. Heard on the application u/sec 170 MV Act and same is allowed.
PW1 and PW2 examined, cross-examined and discharged.
An application has been moved on behalf of petitioner for
summoning of witness. Heard. Allowed.
Let witness be summoned on filing of PF. DM be paid on
spot.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 55/13

16/04/2015
Statement of Sh. Upender Singh, Ld. Counsel for petitioners.
Without Oath.
I close PE on behalf of petitioners.
RO & AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
Misc App. 01/13

16/04/2015
Present:-
Sh. N.K. Pare, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.

Reply to the application u/o 9 rule 13 r/w section 151 CPC
filed. Copy supplied. Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co. submits that RC be
issued but it would not be appropriate to issue RC without disposal of the
application u/o 9 rule 13 r/w section 151 CPC. Also application u/o 9 rule
13 r/w section 151 CPC cannot be disposed off without perusal of the file
which is in the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. Matter is pending before the
Hon'ble High Court of Delhi for 14/10/2015.
Put up for further proceedings on 28/10/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
Ex. No. 45/11

16/04/2015
Present:-
Sh. N.K. Pare, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.

Reply to the application u/o 9 rule 13 r/w section 151 CPC
filed. Copy supplied. Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co. submits that RC be
issued but it would not be appropriate to issue RC without disposal of the
application u/o 9 rule 13 r/w section 151 CPC. Also application u/o 9 rule
13 r/w section 151 CPC cannot be disposed off without perusal of the file
which is in the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. Matter is pending before the
Hon'ble High Court of Delhi for 14/10/2015.
Put up for further proceedings on 28/10/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 151/14

16/04/2015
Present:-
Sh. Lalit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

Sh. Sandeep Arya, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1 and 2.
Sh. Anupam Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
WS filed on behalf of Insurance Co. Memo of appearance
filed on behalf of respondent no. 1 and 2. Copy of complete documents

stated to be not supplied to respondent no. 1 and 2. Complete set
documents supplied today.
Put up for WS of respondent no. 1 and 2 on 21/05/2015..
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 157/14

16/04/2015
Present:-
Sh. Lalit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

Sh. Sandeep Arya, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1 and 2.
Sh. Anupam Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
Memo of appearance filed on behalf of respondent no. 1 and
2. Copy of complete documents stated to be not supplied to respondent no.

1 and 2. Complete set documents supplied today.
Put up for WS of respondent no. 1 and 2 on 21/05/2015..
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 143/13

16/04/2015
Present:-
Sh. Upender Singh, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

Sh. Vinod Kaul, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
No RW present despite last and final opportunity hence, RE
stands closed.
Put up for final arguments on 21/05/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 93/13 & 94/13

16/04/2015
Present:-
Sh. Munish Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

No RW present despite last and final opportunity hence, RE
stands closed. No time left for final arguments.

(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
FIR No. 700/14

PS New Usmanpur
16/04/2015
Fresh DAR alongwith VIR filed by IO. It be checked and
registered.
Present:-
Injured alongwith ld. Counsel Ms. Bharti Bala.

Driver in person.
Owner not present.
Sh.Aman Shankar, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
ACP Anand Kumar is present on the show cause notice and
filed the report. Memo of appearance filed on behalf of Insurance Co.

Copy of DAR supplied.
Issue notice to owner through IO for 21/05/2015. Present
application be tagged alongwith DAR proceedings.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
Mohit Vs. Unknown.

16/04/2015
Present:-
Ms. Bharti Bala, Ld. Counsel for the injured.

IO in person.
IO seeks time for filing of DAR.
Put up for filing of DAR as last and final opportunity on
30/04/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 330/12 & 331/12

16/04/2015
Present:-
Petitioner no. 1 in person who is also Advocate.

Written arguments already filed. Copy already supplied.
Further arguments heard.
Put up for clarification if any / order on 28/04/2015
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No. 238/13

16/04/2015
Present:-
None for injured despite repeated calls since morning.

Sh. Kunwar Mohd, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
Put up for RE on 07/05/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
Jitender Vs. Visharat

FIR No. 370/14
PS Khajuri Khas
16/04/2015
registered.
Present:-
Sh. Ratneshwar Jha, Ld. Counsel for LRs of deceased.

Driver and owner not present.
Sh. S.P.S Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
Issue notice to driver and owner through IO for 21/05/2015.
Ld. Counsel for LRs of deceased is directed to file the memo of

appearance on the next date of hearing.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
DAR No. 216/14

16/04/2015
Present:-
Ms. Bharti Bala, Ld. Counsel for the injured.

Sh. Vinod Kumar, father of the driver who is also owner of
the vehicle.
Sh. S.K. Sharma, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.
IO also present.
Reply filed on behalf of Insurance Co. Copy supplied.
Original treatment papers and reports are supplied to the IO.
IO is directed to obtain the fresh opinion regarding the nature of injury of

injured after placing all the documents before the doctor of GTB Hospital.
Doctors at GTB Hospital are directed to examine the treatment papers and
record and give the fresh opinion regarding the nature of injury of injured.
Put up for filing of report by the IO on 27/05/2015. Copy of
order be given dasti to IO.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
Ex No. 24/2013
16/04/2015
Present:-
None.
Report on the recovery certificate not received.
Issue fresh recovery certificate against the JD for 14/07/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
FIR No. 795/14

PS Karawal Nagar
LRs of Nain Singh Vs. Chand and Others
16/04/2015
Present:-
Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

Driver also present.
IO not present.
Issue B/W against the IO in a sum of Rs. 5000/- for
05/05/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
FIR No. 686/14

PS New Usmanpur
16/04/2015
Present:-
IO not present.
Put up on 05/05/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
Gautam Vs. Santosh Tiwari

FIR No. 308/14
PS Sonia Vihar
16/04/2015
registered.
Present:-
Injured in person.
Driver in person.
Owner not present.
Copy of DAR supplied to injured and driver.
Issue notice to owner and insurance co. through IO for
25/05/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
Seema Vs. Santosh Tiwari

FIR No. 308/14
PS Sonia Vihar
16/04/2015
registered.
Present:-
Sh. Gautam in person who submits that he is nephew of

Injured
Driver in person.
Owner not present.
25/05/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
Mayank Vs. Santosh Tiwari

FIR No. 308/14
PS Sonia Vihar
16/04/2015
registered.
Present:-
Uncle of Injured in person.

Driver in person.
Owner not present.
Copy of DAR supplied to uncle of injured and driver.
25/05/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
MACT No.320/11
16/04/2015
Present:-
None for petitioner.

Sh. Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1
and 2.
None for Insurance Co. at this moment.
No time left for final arguments.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
FIR No. 768/14

PS Seelam Pur
16/04/2015
Present:-
IO ASI Beghraj Singh in person.

Put up on 18/04/2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)/16.04.2015
DD No. 24A
DAR no. 44/15
Fakruddin Vs. Rahul
PS Sonia Vihar
Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Injured Fakruddin in person.
Owner Sh. Lallan in person.

Today owner has paid Rs. 20,000/- to the injured, hence Award is satisfied.
File be consigned to record room. Copy of the order be given to both the
parties.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 346/11

Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Sh. Prahlad Kumar, ld. counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner in
person.
Sh. Karambir/respondent no. 2 in person.
Today respondent no. 2 has paid Rs. 50000/- cash to the injured.
Put up for balance amount i.e Rs. 35000/- on 29.04.2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 613/09

Date : 16.04.2015
R3W1: Statement of Sh. Ranjeet Singh, MLO Mathura, Authority.

On SA
I have brought the summoned record. As per our record the driving license no.
636/MTR/08 in the name of Sh. Shiv Kumar S/o Sh. Lakhan Singh ,R/o Gopal Pur,
Rasul Pur , Mathura, UP, the above said license is valid for driving for Motorcycle and
light motor vehicle which is valid from 15.01.2008 to 14.01.2028. The drivign license
no. 636/MTR/08 not issued in the name of Sh. Naresh Kumar. Copy of the same is Ex.
R3W1/A (Colly 3 sheets).
xxxx by respondents no. 1 & 2.

Respondents no. 1 & 2 are already ex-parte.
xxxxx by Sh. Punit Singh, ld. counsel for petitioner.
Nil. Opportunity given.
RO &AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 613/09

Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Sh. Puneet Singh, ld. counsel for petitioner.
Respondents no. 1 & 2 are already ex-parte.

Sh. Abid Malik , ld. counsel for respondent no. 3.
Sh. Ranjeet Singh, MLO Mathura is present in person and requested for
cancellation of NBW.
NBWs stands cancelled.
R3W1 Sh. Ranjeet Singh is present, examined , cross examined and discharged.
Diet money of Rs. 1000/- paid.
Put up for respondent's evidence on 25.05.2015. Copy of the order be given to
ld. counsel for insurance company.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
DAR No. 168/14

PS Seelam Pur
Mohan Kumar Vs. Naveen Bhatia
Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Injured Mohan Kumar in person.
Driver Cum Owner Sh. Naveen Bhatia in person.

Today driver cum owner has paid third installment i.e Rs. 22000/- to the injured.
Put up for fourth installment i.e Rs. 22,000/- on 16.05.2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 163/08

Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Sh. Pradeep Tyagi, ld. counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Upender Kumar , ld. counsel for insurance company alongwith Ms. Palvi
Thakral, AO.
None for other respondents.
Witness namely Sh. Ranjeet Singh, MLO Mathura , UP in person but
unexamined as witness has not brought the complete record. Witness namely Sh.
Ranjeet Singh is bound down on the next date of hearing.
Put up for respondent's evidence on 30.04.2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 39/13

Date : 16.04.2015
PW 1: Statement of Smt. Banu, W/o Late Rijaul, Permanent Address of Para Nootan
Helder Para Bhagirathpur, PS Domkal, Distt. Mursidabad, West Bengal at present at
C/o Chand Begum, 201/32-D, Ground Floor, Ram Chander Gali, East Maujpur, Delhi.
ON SA
I tender my affidavit by way of evidence and the same is Ex. PW 1/A which
bears my signatures at point A & B. I also rely upon the documents i.e
1. Certified copy of final report alongwith all the related documents is Ex. PW 1/1.
(Colly 60 sheets)
2. Photocopy of Bank Passbook of UCO Bank of the petitioner Ex. PW 1 / 2.
xxxx by Sh. Fakhruddin, ld. counsel for respondents no. 1 & 2.

Cross examination deferred.
RO &AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 39/13

Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Sh. Chaudhary Rajiv Kumar, ld. counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Fakhruddin, ld. counsel for respondents no. 1 & 2.

Sh. A. S. Rawat, ld. counsel for respondent no. 3.
Ld. counsel for respondent no. 3 has moved an application U/s 170 M. V. Act.
PW 1 Smt. Banu is present and has tendered her affidavit but cross examination
is deferred.
Put up for cross examination of PW 1/ remaining petitioner's evidence on
07.09.2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 183/11

Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Sh. J. B. Nagar, ld. counsel for petitioner.
Clerk of ld. counsel for respondent no. 6.

None for other respondents.
Witness Sh. Rajneesh Singh, MLO, Mathura is present, but he has not brought
the recored. It is stated that he was not aware about the order in the present case and he
is being provided with the details and record which is required. The abvoesaid witness
is being bound down on the next date of hearing.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 49/14

Nazrine Vs. Satnam Singh
Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Sh. Abbas Khan, ld. counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Sanjeev Srivastav, ld. counsel for insurance company.

Ld. counsel for petitioner and ld. counsel for insurance company submits that
there are chances of settlement, matter be referred to daily continuous Lok Adalat.
Heard. In view of the submissions of both the parties matter is referred to daily
continuous Lok Adalat. Both the parties are directed to appear before Judge Lok
Adalat on 25.04.2015 at 4:00 pm.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 195/13

Date : 16.04.2015
P W1: Statement of Ruksana, W/o Adil Ahmad, R/o 1083, Gali no. 22, B-Block,
Shriram Colony, Rajiv Nagar, Delhi 94.
ON SA
I tender my affidavit by way of evidence and the same is Ex. PW 1/A which
bears my signatures at point A & B. I also rely upon the documents i.e
1. certified /attested copy of criminal case record Ex. PW 1/1. (Colly 54 sheets)
2. Original medical bills of the deponent Ex. PW 1 / 2. (Colly 2 sheets)
3. Original discharge summary/prescription of the deponent Ex. PW 1/ 3 be read
as Mark A as witness has not brought the original.
4. Copy of voter card of the deponent Ex. PW 1/ 4 (OSR)
5. Copy of medical bill is Mark B.
xxxxx by Sh. Jai Bhagwan, ld. counsel for respondents no. 1 & 2.
I had told the facts of the case to my counsel before filing of the present case as
well as before drafting of my affidavit. I had told the facts to the police before
registration of FIR. It is wrong to suggest that FIR was not registered on my statement.
I was standing near the footpath when the accident occurred. It is wrong to suggest that
I was crossing the road when the accident occurred. It is wrong to suggest that accused
had occurred due to my fault as I was crossing the road without any zebra crossing. It
is wrong to suggest that motorcycle bearing no. DL 2C AA 5500 had hit me. It is
wrong to suggest that I have filed a wrong claim petition against the bus, driver and
owner. It is wrong to suggest that false FIR was registered against the respondents.
xxxx by Sh. Vinod Kaul, ld. counsel for respondent no. 3.
I have filed whatever medical bills I had on record. I do not have any further
medical bills regarding the treatment and the miscellaneous expenditure regarding
conveyance, diet etc. . I do not have any receipts to show that I had paid the amount to
the attendant @ Rs. 4000/- per month. It is wrong to suggest that I had not engaged
any attendant.
I do not have any documentary proof regarding my occupation and
income. I do not have any document to show that I have suffered any disability. It is
wrong to suggest that I have submitted falsely of having suffered financially or
physically as a result of the accident. It is wrong to suggest that I have filed false
medical bills and treatment record which has not relation with the present accident and
injuries. It is wrong to suggest that I am deposing falsely.
RO &AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 195/13

Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Ms. Pinki Talukdar, ld. counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Jai Bhagwan, ld. counsel for respondents no. 1 & 2.

Sh. Vinod Kaul, ld. counsel for respondent no. 3.
Ld. counsel for respondent no. 3 has moved an application U/s 170 M. V. Act.
PW 1 Ruksana is present, examined, cross examined and discharged.
Ld. counsel for petitioner reports closure of evidence. Heard. Statement of ld.
counsel for petitioner recorded separately. In view of the statement of ld. counsel for
petitioner, PE closed.
Put up for RE on 10.07.2014
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 195/13

Date : 16.04.2015
Statement of Ms. Pinki Talukdar, ld. counsel for petitioner.
Without Oath
I close petitioner's evidence.
RO &AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 348/08

Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Sh. R. N. Chaudhary, ld. counsel for petitioner.
Sh. K. Raj, ld. counsel for respondents no. 1 alognwith respondent no. 1 in
person.
Sh. Vinod Kaul, ld. counsel for insurance company.
Witness Sh. Bhupender Singh, LDC, Transport Department , Burari, Delhi, but
he has not brought the record. He is bound down on the next date of hearing. Diet
money of Rs. 400/- paid.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 164/13

Date : 16.04.2015
File is taken up on an application for release of cheque.
Present:
Ld. counsel for applicant alongwith applicant namely Deepak Mishra in
person. .
Cheque received in pursuance of Interim Award dated 09.02.2015.
Cheque bearing no. 104734 dated 18.02.2015 drawn on HDFC Bank for an
amount of Rs. 28,582 /- to be handed over to applicant Deepak Mishra against proper
receipt.
Application stands disposed off.
Put up on date fixed i.e on 21.08.2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 554/09/08

Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Ld. counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner.
Cheque received in pursuance of Award dated 16.10.2014.

Cheque bearing no. 803078 dated 17.02.2015 drawn on Standard Chartered
Bank for an amount of Rs. 23,790/- to be handed over to petitioner namely Julfikar.
File be consigned to record room.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 89/10

Date : 16.04.2015
R3W2: Statement of Ms. Pallavi Thakral, A. O. , Oriental Insurance Company, Office

at F-14/20, United India Life Building, Connaught Place, Delhi.
ON SA
The company has issued the policy for the vehicle no. DL 1V-A-0222 (RTV)
vide policy no. 214303/31/2010/594 w.e.f 01.05.2009 to 30.04.2010 in the name of Sh.
Karar Hussain. It is further endorsed in the name of Sh. Narander Tirpathi on
09.07.2009 with the same policy no. and policy period subject to the terms, condition
and limitations of the policy. The policy in the name of Sh. Karar Hussain is Ex.
R3W2/1 (colly 2 sheets) and Sh. Narander Tirpathi is Ex. R3W2/2. The company has
issued the notices U/o 12 Rule 8 CPC to the driver Sh. Vinod Kumar and owners Sh.
Karar Hussain and Sh. Narander Tirpathi to produce the required documents as
mentioned in the notices U/o 12 Rule 8 CPC i.e DL, Permit, original insurance policy,
RC of the vehicle etc. through the counsel. The owners and the driver neither produced
the same in the court concerned or nor to the insurance Company. The notice issued to
the driver is Ex. R3W2/3 and postal receipts Ex. R3W2/4. The notice issued to the
owners namely Karar Hussain and Narander Tirpath are Ex. R3W2/5 and postal receipts
Ex. R 3W2/6 and Ex. R3W2/7. Company has verified the the DL of the driver Vinod
Kumar through investigator and the report of the investigator is Ex. R3W2/8 and the
report of the licensing authority Durga Pur is Ex. R3W2/9. As per the report of the
investigator there is no record of the DL in the name of Sh. Vinod Kumar. The manual
record of the licensing authroity Ex. R3W2/9 reflects the name of driving license holder
is Tarsin Singh for the DL no. WB 39-016922. If there is any violation of the terms,
conditions and limitations of the policy the company is not liable to indemnify to
insured.
Xxxxxby Sh. Basant Narayan Singh, Ld. proxy counsel for petitioner.
Nil. Opportunity given.
Xxx by respondents no. 1, 2 & 4.
Respondents no. 1, 2 & 4 are already ex-parte.
RO &AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 11/09/08

Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Ld. counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner in person namely Kamini
Kaushal Khanna.
Cheque bearing no. 500641 dated 07.04.2015 drawn on HSBC for an amount
of Rs. 20,000/- to be handed over to petitioner namely Kamini Kaushal.
Cheque bearing no. 500644 dated 08.04.2015 drawn on HSBC for an amount
of Rs. 12,965/- to be handed over to petitioner namely Kamini Kaushal.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 39/10

Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Sh. Basant Narayan Singh, Ld. proxy counsel for petitioner.
Respondents no. 1, 2 & 4 are already ex-parte.

Ms. Shalini Upadhaya, ld. counsel for respondent no. 3.
R3W2 Ms. Pallavi Thakral is present , examined, cross examined and
discharged.
Witness from Licensing Authority, Durga Pur , West Bengal not appeared. Issue
fresh summons to the abovesaid witness. Dasti be also given to ld. counsel for
respondent no. 3.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 195/14

FIR No. 751/14
PS Sohna
U/s 279/304A IPC
Date : 16.04.2015
Statement of Ms. Som Bati , W/o Late Sh. Raj Pal, R/o H. No. C-20, Gali no. 1,
Sadbhawna School, Shanti Nagar, Shiv Vihar, Delhi.
ON SA
I am the petitioner in the present claim petition and making this statement
voluntarily. I want to withdraw the present claim petition and same be allowed.
RO &AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 388/10

Date : 16.04.2015
R3W1: Statement of Sh. Sunil Kr. Verma, A.O. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Office at 12/1, Jeevan Raksha Building, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi.
ON SA
I have brought the attested true copy of the insurance policy for the vehicle no.
UP -16-D-2829 which was issued in the name of M/s Konark Roadways for the period
of 08.12.2009 to 07.12.2010 of the policy bearing no. 32030131090100203355. The
policy is Ex. R3W1/1. The company through the counsel has sent the notices U/o 12
Rule 8 CPC to the driver and owner to produce the documents as mentioned in the
notice. The owenr and driver neither produce the same in the court concerned or nor to
the company. The legal notices are Ex. R3W1/2 and postal receipts Ex. R3W1/3 and
Legal notice Ex. R3W1/4 and postal receipt Ex. R3W1/5 to the Tufani Yadav. The
registration certificate of the vehicle no. UP 16D which is already on the record is Ex.
R3W1/6. If there is any violation of the terms, conditions and limitations of the policy
the company is not liable to indemnify to insured. The DL verification report is
received directly in the Hon'ble court and the same is Ex. R3W1/7 and the cover is Ex.
R3W1/8.
Xxxxx by Sh. Bijay Kumar, ld. counsel for petitioner.
It is wrong to suggest that the insurance company is
liable to pay the
compensation to the petitioner.

Xxxx by Sh. Ashok Kr. Goel, Ld. counsel for respondents no. 1 & 2.
It is wrong to suggest that any notice U/o 12 Rule 8 CPC sent to the driver and
owner. It is wrong to suggest that there was no violation of any terms and conditions of
the policy vis a vie the DL of the driver. It is wrong to suggest that I am deposing
falsely.
RO &AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 388/10

Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Sh. Bijay Kumar, ld. counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Ashok Kr. Goel, Ld. counsel for respondents no. 1 & 2.
Ms. Shalini Upadhaya, ld. counsel for respondent no. 3.
R3W1 Sh. Sunil Kr. Verma is present, examined, cross examined and
discharged.
Ld. counsel for respondent no. 3 reports closure of evidence. Heard. Statement
of ld. counsel for respondent no. 3 recorded separately. In view of the statement of ld.
counsel for respondent no. 3, RE closed.
Put up for final arguments on 21.05.2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 388/10

Date : 16.04.2015
Statement of Ms. Shalini Upadhaya, ld. counsel for respondent no. 3

Without Oath.
I close respondent's evidence on behalf of respondent no. 3.
RO &AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 135/12

Date : 16.04.2015
Present:
Ld. counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner in person namely Meena.

Cheque bearing no. 526170 dated 31.03.2015 drawn on Corporation Bank for
an amount of Rs. 1,71,399/- to be handed over to petitioner namely Meena.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 21/12

Date : 16.04.2015
File is taken up on an application for release of cheque.
Present:
Ld. counsel for applicant alongwith applicants namely Rajender and
Sachin in
person.

amount of Rs. 5,70,860/- to be handed over to applicant namely Rajender against
proper receipt.
amount of Rs. 5,70,860/- to be handed over to applicant namely Sachin against proper
receipt.
amount of Rs. 5,70,860/- in the name of Manish Kumar (minor) to be handed over to
Rajender (Father of Sachin) against proper receipt.
amount of Rs. 5,70,860/- in the name of Manish Kumar (minor) to be handed over to
Rajender (Father of Sachin) against proper receipt.
amount of Rs. 5,70,860/- in the name of Manisha (minor) to be handed over to
Rajender (Father of Manisha) against proper receipt.
Application stands disposed off.
File be consigned to record room. Date already fixed i.e on 07.05.2015 stands
cancelled.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
Jagan Singh Vs. Ranvir Singh & Ors.

Date : 16.04.2015
Fresh Claim petition received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present:
Ld. counsel for petitioner.
Heard.
SHO concerned is directed to verify the address of petitioner whether he is
residing at the given address or not.
Issue summons to the respondents on filing of PF/RC. Respondent no. 1 may
also be got served through concerned DJ with request letter.
Put up for service report of respondents on 13.07.2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
Shiv Charan Vs. Raj Kumar & Ors.

Date : 16.04.2015
Fresh Claim petition received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present:
Sh. Robin Tyagi, Ld. counsel for petitioner.
Heard.
SHO concerned is directed to verify the address of petitioner whether he is
residing at the given address or not.
Issue summons to the respondents on filing of PF/RC. Respondent no. 1 may
also be got served through concerned DJ with request letter.
Put up for service report of respondents on 13.07.2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
MACT No. 195/14

Date : 16.04.2015
File is taken up on an application moved by petitioner for withdrawal of petition.
Present:
Ld. counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner in person.
Petitioner submits that she wants to withdraw the present claim petition and
same be allowed.
Heard. Statement of petitioner recorded separately. In view of the statement of
petitioner, present claim petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record room. Date already fixed i.e 06.05.2015 stands
cancelled. Copy of the order be given dasti.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
DAR No. 221/14

FIR No. 609/14
PS Sonia Vihar
Date : 16.04.2015
File received back from Daily Lok Adalat.

Present:
None.
As the matter stands settled in daily lok adalat, claim petition be disposed off in
terms of settlement arrived in Daily Lok Adalat on 15.04.2015. Present file be
consigned to record room.
Ahlmad is directed to create misc. file for compliance.
Put up for compliance on 15.05.2015.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
FIR No. 268/15

PS Khajuri Khas
U/s 279/337 IPC
Date : 16.04.2015
Fresh DAR filed by HC Mahesh Kumar. It be checked and registered.
Present:
Injured Ram Sunder in person.
IO HC Mahesh Kumar in person.

IO submits that as on today the particulars of offending vehicle, driver and
owner are not traced in the investigation and therefore the said particulars could not be
furnished. It is also further submits that he has also filed untrace report U/s 173 Cr. P.
C. and he has informed the injured about the untrace report and he shall file the
abovesaid particulars as and when discovered in future investigation.
Injured submits that he has satisfied with the untrace report filed by the IO and
he has no objection if the same is accepted.
Heard. Statement of injured and IO recorded. In view of the statement made by
the IO and untrace report filed by the police , present proceedings are hereby closed.
However matter be taken up again by the police as and when any clue of the offending
vehicle comes to notice of police. File be consigned to record room. Copy of the order
be given dasti to IO.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
FIR No. 268/15

PS Khajuri Khas
U/s 279/337 IPC
Date : 16.04.2015
Statement of Sh. Ram Sunder Dubey, S/o Sh. Inder Pal Dubey, R/o C-134, Gali no. 6,
West Karawal Nagar, Delhi.
On SA
I am the injured in the present case. I have no knowledge about the registration
number of the offending vehicle , therefore I have no objection, if the DAR proceeding
is closed as well as untrace report is accepted.
RO &AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
FIR No. 268/15

PS Khajuri Khas
U/s 279/337 IPC
Date : 16.04.2015
Statement of HC Mahesh Kumar, no. 88NE PS Khajuri Khas, Delhi.
On SA
I have the filed the present DAR in FIR no. 268/15. As on today the particulars
of offending vehicle, driver and owner are not traced in the investigation, therefore the
said particulars could not be furnished. I have also filed untrace report u/s 173 Cr. P.C.
I have informed the injured about the untrace report.
I shall file the abovesaid
particulars as and when discovered in future investigation. Present DAR be closed.

RO &AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
FIR No. 681/13

PS Bhajan Pura
U/s 279/338 IPC
Jayeda Vs. Unknown
Date : 16.04.2015
Statement of Jayeda , W/o Sh. Kamar Alam, R/o Block -C, Gali no. 9, North Ghonda,
Delhi.
On SA
I am the injured in the present case. I have no knowledge about the registration
number of the offending vehicle , therefore I have no objection, if the DAR proceeding
is closed as well as untrace report is accepted.
RO &AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
FIR No. 681/13

PS Bhajan Pura
U/s 279/338 IPC
Jayeda Vs. Unknown
Date : 16.04.2015
Statement of HC Sanjeev Kumar, no. 78 NE, PS Bhajan Pura, Delhi.
On SA
On SA
I have the filed the present DAR in FIR no. 681/13. As on today the particulars
of offending vehicle, driver and owner are not traced in the investigation, therefore the
said particulars could not be furnished. I have also filed untrace report u/s 173 Cr. P.C.
I have informed the injured about the untrace report.
I shall file the abovesaid
particulars as and when discovered in future investigation. Present DAR be closed.

RO &AC
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015
FIR No. 681/13

PS Bhajan Pura
U/s 279/338 IPC
Jayeda Vs. Unknown
Date : 16.04.2015
Fresh DAR filed by HC Mahesh Kumar. It be checked and registered.
Present:
Injured Jayeda in person.
IO HC Sanjeev Kumar in person.

IO submits that as on today the particulars of offending vehicle, driver and
owner are not traced in the investigation and therefore the said particulars could not be
furnished. It is also further submits that he has also filed untrace report U/s 173 Cr. P.
C. and he has informed the injured about the untrace report and he shall file the
abovesaid particulars as and when discovered in future investigation.
Injured submits that he has satisfied with the untrace report filed by the IO and
he has no objection if the same is accepted.
Heard. Statement of injured and IO recorded. In view of the statement made by
the IO and untrace report filed by the police , present proceedings are hereby closed.
However matter be taken up again by the police as and when any clue of the offending
vehicle comes to notice of police. File be consigned to record room. Copy of the order
be given dasti to IO.
(KIRAN BANSAL)
PO-MACT(NE)
16.04.2015

List New2.ASP

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

List New2.ASP

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

MACT No.

Sh. Mehtab Ali, Father of deceased.

MACT No. 09/15

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

petitioner is residing at the given address.

MACT No. 16/15

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

taken on record. More time sought to file the reply / WS.

MACT No. 49/15

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

MACT No. 50/15

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

DAR No. 133/12

Sh. Bijay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

DAR No. 139/13

None for injured.

the vehicle auctioned as per law.

Injured alongwith ld. Counsel.

DAR No. 61/15

Injured alongwith ld. Counsel Sh. Indra Bhushan.

IO be called to report as to what action he has taken against the injured as

MACT No. 480/11

Sh. B.K. Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

MACT No. 55/13

MACT No. 55/13

MACT No. 08/15

Sh. P.K. Sisodia, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

record. Respondent no. 1 not served.

MACT No. 55/13

Sh. Upender Singh, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

PW1 Sh. Salim and PW2 Sh. Rojuddin cross-examined and

discharged. PE stands closed on the statement of ld. Counsel for the

MACT No. 52/14

MACT No. 52/14

MACT No. 52/14

Sh. Sudesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

filed. WS filed on behalf of Insurance Co. alongwith application u/sec 170

MACT No. 55/13

Misc App. 01/13

Sh. N.K. Pare, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.

Ex. No. 45/11

Sh. N.K. Pare, Ld. Counsel for Insurance Co.

MACT No. 151/14

Sh. Lalit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

filed on behalf of respondent no. 1 and 2. Copy of complete documents

MACT No. 157/14

Sh. Lalit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

2. Copy of complete documents stated to be not supplied to respondent no.

MACT No. 143/13

Sh. Upender Singh, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

MACT No. 93/13 & 94/13

Sh. Munish Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

stands closed. No time left for final arguments.

FIR No. 700/14

Injured alongwith ld. Counsel Ms. Bharti Bala.

filed the report. Memo of appearance filed on behalf of Insurance Co.

Mohit Vs. Unknown.

Ms. Bharti Bala, Ld. Counsel for the injured.

MACT No. 330/12 & 331/12

Petitioner no. 1 in person who is also Advocate.

MACT No. 238/13

None for injured despite repeated calls since morning.

Jitender Vs. Visharat

Sh. Ratneshwar Jha, Ld. Counsel for LRs of deceased.