Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 39

Ex.No.

07/15
16.04.2015
Pr:

CounselforDH.
Ld.CounselforDHfiledanaffidavitoftheDHregardingnostayof

theproceedingsbyanyCourt.
IssueNoticeoftheapplicationtotheJDonPFfor06.05.2015.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015


CSNo.224/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Plaintiffinperson.
CounselfordefendantNo.1and2withdefendantsinperson.
Requestforadjournmentismadebyplaintifftoaddressargumentsas

hiscounselisbusyinHighCourtinsomeothermatterandisnotavailabletoday.
Requestnotopposed.
Atrequest,putupforfinalargumentson16.05.2015.
(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

Ex.08/15
16.04.2015
Pr:

CounselforDHwithDHinperson.
JDinperson.
Itisjointlysubmittedonbehalfofpartiesthatmatterislikelytobe

settledandmaybereferredtoMediationCellforsettlement.Atjointrequestofthe
partiesmatterisreferredtoMediationCell,KKDCourtsforsettlement.Partiesare
directedtoappearbeforeMediationCell,KKDCourtforsettlementon20.04.2015
at02:00PM.
Put up before this Court for the outcome of the Mediation
Proceedingson05.05.2015.
(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.213/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Counselforplaintiffwithplaintiffinperson.
DefendantNo.1inperson.
Sh.RajKumarMittal,CounselfordefendantNo.2.
Affidavit of DW1 Sh. Rajesh Jain/defendant No. 1 filed. Copy

suppliedtothecounselforplaintiff.
PutupforDE/CrossexaminationofDW1on14.05.2015.
(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

P07/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Counselforpetitioner.
CounselforrespondentNo.2.
CounselforrespondentNo.2seekssometimetofileobjections.Ld.

Counsel for petitioner also seeks some time to file correct death certificate of
deceasedSmt.BimlaDevi.
Atrequest,putupforthesameon08.05.2015.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.10/15
16.04.2015
Pr:

Counselforplaintiff.
CounselfordefendantNo.1.
ReplicationtotheWSofdefendantNo.1filed.Copysupplied.
Asobserved,nonehasbeenappearingonbehalfofdefendantNo.2

norwrittenstatementhasbeenfiledonhisbehalf.DefendantNo.2isaccordingly
proceededexparte.
No document tendered on behalf of parties for admission/denial.
Pleading in this matter is complete. In view of the pleadings of the parties
followingissuesareframed:
(1)WhethertheplaintiffisentitledfordecreeofRs.4,82,529/alongwith
interestasprayedinthesuit?OPP
(2)Relief.
Nootherissuearisesnorpressedfromthepleadings.
Put up for PE by way of affidavit with one week advance copy to the
counselfordefendantNo.1 on28.05.2015. Listofwitnessesbefiledby
theboththepartieswithinaweekandstepsbealsotakenforsummoning
thewitnesses,ifany,bytheplaintiffonPFanddietmoneyfordatefixed.
Boththepartiesareatlibertytofiletheoriginaldocumentsalongwithlist
ofdocumentswithinaweek.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.243/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Counselforplaintiff.
Counselfordefendants.
ReplytotheapplicationU/OIXRule7r/wSection151ofCPCfiled

bytheplaintiff.Copysupplied.
ArgumentsontheapplicationU/OIXRule7r/wSection151ofCPC
heardandgonethroughtherecords.
At the outset, the reasons mentioned in the application by the
defendantsinsupportofcontentionsdonotinspireconfidenceasthelawyerwas
busyinsomeothercourtisnotagroundatall.Inthefactsandcircumstancesof
thecaseandinviewofthesubmissionsandintheinterestofjustice,todecidethe
controversyonmerit,onemoreopportunityisgrantedtothedefendantsand the
applicationU/OIXRule7CPCisallowedsubjecttocostofRs.5,000/tobepaidto
theplaintiff.Theproceduresarehandmadeofjusticeandnottodefeatthesame.No
prejudiceislikelytobecausedtotheplaintiffatall.Itisexpedientthatdefendantis
grantedopportunitytocontestthesuitsothatthematterisdecidedonmerits.Bothof
thewitnessesbecrossexaminedonthenextdateofhearingfailingwhichrightto
crossexaminethewitnessesshallbeautomaticallyclosed.
Putupforcrossexaminationofthewitnesseson15.05.2015.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.287/14
16.04.2015

Pr:

Counselforplaintiff.
Counselfordefendant.
Finalargumentsheardatlength.
Videseparatejudgmentannouncedintheopencourttoday,suitof

theplaintiffisdecreedwithcost.
Decreesheetbedrawnaccordingly.
Filebeconsignedtorecordroom.

(G.N.Pandey)
ADJ02NE,KKD16.04.2015

CSNo.108/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Appellantinperson.
CounselforrespondentNo.1.
CounselforrespondentNo.2and3.
RespondentNo.4inperson.
Finalargumentsheardatlength.
Writtensubmissionsonbehalfofpartiesalsofiled.
Putupforconsideration/orderon17.04.2015.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSANo.412/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Counselforpetitioners.
Counselforrespondent.
Argument heard on the petition U/S 34 of the Arbitration and

ConciliationActforsettingasidetheawarddated25.07.2013.
Putupforconsideration/orderon17.04.2015.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

MCANo.06/15
16.04.2015
Pr:

Counselforappellant.
Noticeissuedtorespondentreceivedbackunservedwiththereport,

notavailableathome.
Counsel for appellant submits that respondent is intentionally
avoidingthesummons.
Counselfor appellantsubmitsthat other matter is pending before
trialcourton29.04.15.
Issue notice of the appeal to respondent on filing of PF/RC for
05.05.15.Stepsbetakenwithintwodays.Dastibegiven.
Noticebeservedtorespondentbeforelearnedtrialcourton29.04.15.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.198/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Husbandofplaintiffinperson.
Counselfordefendant.
ThecaseisfixedbeforeHon'bleHighCourtofDelhion07.07.15as

statedandthiscourtisrestrainedforpassingfinaljudgmentinviewoforderdt.
11.03.15.
Beawaitedandputupforfurtherproceedingson13.07.15.
ReplyoftheapplicationU/o1Rule10CPCbealsofiledbyplaintiff
onnextdateofhearingwithadvancecopytocounselfordefendant/applicant.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

ExNo.04/15
16.04.2015
StatementofSh.RahulGargs/oSh.MaheshChandGuptaR/o7/182,MainRoad
FarshBazar,Shahdara,Delhi32.
OnSA
IamDHinthepresentcaseandIhavereceivedasumofRs.20,00,000/
fromtheJDon09.04.15.Thedecreestandssatisfiedandexecutionpetitionbe
disposedoffaccordingly.
(RO&AC)

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

ExNo.21/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

NoneforDH.
SalaryoftheJDhasbeenattached.
Putupforfurtherproceedingson02.07.15.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

ExNo.04/15
16.04.2015
Pr:

DHinperson.
CounselforJD.
DHsubmitsthathehasreceivedasumofRs.20,00,000/fromthe

JDon09.04.15,decreestandssatisfiedandexecutionpetitionmaybedisposedoff
accordingly.
SeparatestatementofDHisrecordedtothiseffect.
InviewofstatementofDHandsubmissions,executionpetitionis
disposedoffaccordingly.Filebeconsignedtorecordroom.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.71/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Counselforplaintiff.
Sh.HariShankar,Counselfordefendantwithdefendantinperson.
AffidavitofdefendantAshaisonrecordbutcounselfordefendant

submits that he does not want to examine witness namely Asha and wants to
examineotherwitnessnamelyDinesh.Hisrequestisaccepted.Defendant/witness
Ashaisdischargedunexamined.
One more opportunity is granted to defendant to examine other
witnessnamelyDineshwhoisonlywitnesstobeexaminedbythedefendantas
stated.
PutupforfilingofaffidavitofwitnessnamelyDineshwithoneweek
advancecopytocounselforplaintiffandcrossexaminationofdefendantaslast
opportunityon01.06.15.Dateisgivenatthejointrequest.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.166/14
16.04.2015
DW:1:Sh.Akshays/olateSh.RameshChanderBhardwajR/oH.No.1/11836,
PanchsheelGarden,NaveenShahdara,Delhi.
OnSA
ItendermyevidencebywayofaffidavitwhichisEx.DW1/1whichbears
my signature at pt. A and B. I also rely upon other document i.e. chain of
documentsareEx.DW1/A(collyOSR)andWillisEx.DW1/B(OSR)which
bearssignatureofmymotheratpt.AandB.
XXXXbyMs.BabitaSharma,counselforplaintiff.
Ihavestudiedupto10th class.IknowthecontentsofEx.DW1/1.The
signatureatpt.AandBofEx.DW1/1ismine.Ihadsignedatpt.AandBinthe
officeofmycounsel.Iampropertydealersince1997.Myfather(sinceexpired)
wasaGovt.teacherinVivekViharModelSchool.Heusedtoteachthestudentof
10thto12thclass.Icannottelltheincomeofmyfatherintheyear1994.Itcanbe
thathisincomemaybeRs.20,000/.Myfatherdidnotusetoprovidetuition.Itis
wrongtosuggestthatmyfatherusedtoprovidetuition.Itiswrongtosuggestthat
hewasearningmoneybyprovidingtuition.Myfatherhasbeenretiredprobablyin
19941995.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmyfatherretiredon30.09.94.Vol.hegot
retirementaftermymarriageinyear1995,afterIwasmarriedinyear1994.Ido
notknowwhathereceivedafterhisretirement.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmy
fatherhadreceivedRs.8,00,000/afterhisretirement.Itiswrongtosuggestthat

entiremoneywaskeptwithmymother.Myfatherhasnotinvestedanymoneyin
anyshareoranythinginanymanner.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmyfatherhas
purchasedthesharesamountingtoRs.1,00,000/.Icannotadmit/denythatany
shareweregiventomymother.NoLICpolicywasinthenameofmyfather.Itis
wrong to suggest that my father was having LIC policy and its money was
receivedbymymother.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmyfatherhasinvestedincheat
fundcommittee.Itiswrongtosuggestthattheamountofthesamewasreceived
bymymother.Inmyknowledge,myfatherwasnothavinganysocietyflatin
Ghaziabad. It is wrong to suggest that my father was having society flat in
Ghaziabad.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmyfathertookmeandtheplaintifftogo
through the said flat. I do not remember as to what pension , my father was
receivedafterretirement.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmyfatherwasreceivedthe
pensiontothetuneofRs.6,000/to7,000/permonth.Itiswrongtosuggestthat
mymotherwasreceivedthepensionofmyfatherafterhisdeathtothetuneofRs.
10,000/permonth.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmymotherwashavingacash
amountofRs.25,00,000/atthetimeofdeathofmyfather.Ihavefivematernal
uncle(Mama)andoneMaternalaunt(Mausi).Allofmymaternalunclewere
residing in Shahdara itself in 1996. They all were residing in the same house
which was measuring about 233 Sq. yards, built up to ground, first and half
portionuponit.Sevenroomswereatthegroundfloor.Itiswrongtosuggestthat
therewereonlyfiveroomsingroundfloor.Itiswrongtosuggestthattherewasno
kitchenonthegroundfloor.Itiswrongtosuggestthatkitchenwasarrangedby
my maternal uncles in the room itself. In 1996, there was a common latrine
bathroomonthegroundfloor.Therewasadrawingroomandthreebedroomin

thefirstfloor.Itiswrongtosuggestthatthereweretworoomonthefirstfloorand
onlylatrinebathroom.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmymaternaluncleswerenot
havingsufficientspacetoliveinyear1996.Mymaternaluncleswereearningwell
andhavegoodfinancialstatus.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmyfatherhashelpedmy
maternalunclesinthemarriageoftheirchildren.Myfatherwasnotowinganyflat
inDilshadGardenhoweverwewerelivingonrent.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmy
fatherwasowinganyflatinDilshadGardenandhesoldthesameforasumofRs.
6,50,000/.MyfatherwasnotowinganypropertyinJhilmil,Shahdara,opposite
Govt.Schoolwheremyfatherwasearlierteaching.Itiswrongtosuggestthat
after disposing the property of Jhilmil, my father purchased any property in
VishwasNagarbearingH.No.4/82.Itiswrongtosuggestthatafterdisposingthe
propertyofVishwasNagar,myfatherpurchasedpropertyinDilshadGarden.Itis
wrongtosuggestthataftertwomonths,thepropertyofDilshadGardenwassold
andthepropertyofnaveenShahdarawaspurchasedforasumofRs.7,25,000/.
TheflatinwhichwewereresidingatfirstflooronrentatDilshadGarden,in
whichtherewerethreerooms.Itiswrongtosuggestthatthepremisesinwhichwe
wereresidingcouldnotbedistributedintwoparts.Itiswrongtosuggestthatthe
property of Shahdra was purchased by my father with the sole motive to get
divided the same between two brothers. The house in Naveen Shahdars is
constructeduptogroundfloorandoneroomthereupon.Itiscorrectthatthereare
tworoomsonthegroundfloorandoneroomthereupon.Itiswrongtosuggestthat
atthetimeofthepurchaseofpropertyinNaveenShahdara,mymotherdivided
equallybetweenbothbrothers.Mymotherwasoperatingabankaccount.Idonot
remembertheaccountnumber.Icannotadmit/denywhethertheaccountNo.is

1424inSBIBranch,DilshadGarden.Mymotherwasnothavinganylockerinany
bank.ItiswrongtosuggestthatmymotherandfatherwerehavinglockerinUCO
bank,ConnaughtplacevideNo.255.Itiscorrectthatmymotherusedtoreceive
pensioninherbankaccountinSBIbutIcannottellwhetheritwasaccountno.
1424orother.sometimemymotheraloneusedtogotooperatetheaccountorat
othertime,shewasaccompaniedbymeormybrothers.Itiswrongtosuggestthat
neithermymotherusedtogoalonenorboththebrothers.Itiswrongtosuggest
thatmybrotherwasdrugaddictandwasinpositiontoaccompanymymother.Itis
wrongtosuggestthatplaintiffusedtoaccompanymymotherforoperatingthe
bankaccount.Ihadseenmymothersigninginthebank.Mymotherusedtosine
bythenameofUrmil.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmymotherusedtosignbythe
nameofUrmilaBhardwaj.IcannotproduceanyotherdocumentbesideEx.DW1/
BatpresentwhichbearsthesignaturebythenameofUrmil.Itiswrongtosuggest
thattheplaintiffusedtoaccompanymymotherforoperatingthelockerofUCO
bankinCPorthatsheusedtosignbythenameofUrmilaBhardwaj.Itiswrongto
suggestthatmymotherwasnothavinganyfaithinmeandmybrotherandhence
sheusedtotaketheplaintiffwithher.Mymotherusedtogivecashmoneyfor
depositingtheelectricityandwatercharges.Iormymotherusedtogoforthesaid
purpose.Itiswrongtosuggestthatneithermenormymotherusedtogoforsaid
purpose.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmymotherdidnotusetogoanywherealone.It
is wrong to suggest that my mother used to give the cheques to plaintiff for
depositingelectricityandwaterchargesandthosechequesusedtobesignedbyin
thenameofUrmilaBhardwaj.Itiswrongtosuggestthatatthetimeofwithdrawal
ofmoneyfromthelocker,mymotherwasaccompaniedbytheplaintiff,orthat

shesignedtherebythenameofUrmilaBhardwaj.Itiswrongtosuggestthat
plaintiffservedmymothertillsheresideduptoyear2005.Mymaternaluncles
usedtoresideinShahdarainyear2007.Thedistancebetweenthehouseofmy
maternalunclesandofuswasaboutfiveminutesofwalkingdistance.IknowAnil
Tyagiforlast1820years.ItiswrongtosuggestthatIamnotknowingAnilTyagi
since1820years.AsfarasIknow,Sh.AnilTyagiisresidingtheresincelast
3034years.Webothareknowtoeachotherbeingtheneighbourers.mymotheris
familierwithSh.AnilTyagisincethetime,Iknowhim.Itiswrongtosuggest
thatmymotherdidnotusetolikeSh.AnilTyaginorsheusedtolikemysitting
withhim.ThehouseofSh.AnilTyagiisoppositetoourhouse.Itiswrongto
suggestthatAnilTyagiwashavingbadhabitsandduetothisreason,motherof
mineandmotherofAnilTyagiwasagainsthim.YogeshGosaiismybrotherin
lawandisresidinginChandanNagarwhichisatthedistanceofhour.The
executionofEx.DW1/Bdt.05.06.07wasintheknowledgeofmymaternal
uncle.Myuncleswerenotatmyhomeatthattime.Icannotsayastowhymy
motherhasnotcalledmyunclesatthetimeexecutionofwill.TheWillEx.DW
1/BwasdraftedandexecutedbymymotherinKKDCourts.Mymotherhasnot
calledanybodyfromherparentalside.ItiswrongtosuggestthatEx.DW1/Bwas
hasbeenforgedbymeinconnivanceofSh.AnilTyagiandYogeshGosaiand
hencenobodycamefromtheparentalsideofmymother.Myallmaternaluncles
helped my mother to purchase theproperty of which document Ex. DW 1/ A
(colly).Icannottellwhichmaternalunclehelpedofwhatamount.Itiswrongto
suggestthatnoneofmymaternalunclehelpedmymotherforpurchasingofsaid
property.Ialongwithmyfamilyisresidinginthesaidpropertyatgroundandfirst

floor.Ms.Rashmi,thedaughterofplaintiffwasmarriedinyear2010.Rashmiis
residinginhermatrimonialhome.Icannottelltheaddressofhermatrimonial
home.Sheisonthevisitingtermswithus.Idonottrytoknowheraddress.Itis
wrongtosuggestthatIamdeposingfalselyinthisregard.Ms.Rashmiisnotin
possessionofthepropertyatNaveenShahdara.Shehasnotdemandedhershareas
perEx.DW1/B.Asperwill,Ms.Rashmiisentitledforher1/3th share.Itis
wrongtosuggestthatIdidnotwantgiveshareofMs.Rashmi.Itiswrongto
suggestthatwillhasbeenpreparedastheplaintiffcouldnotgethershare.Itis
wrongtosuggestthatafterthedeathofmymother,meandmybrothershaveequal
share.Itiswrongtosuggestthatafterthedeathofmybrother,plaintiffandher
daughterisentitledfortheirshare.Itiscorrectthatafterthedeathoffather,my
motherusedtoconsultwithmymaternaluncleonimportantissues.Icannotgive
anyreasonastowhyshedidnotcallherbrotherstowitnessontheWillandthere
weregoodrelationbetweenthem.Itiscorrectthatmyfatherusedtobearexpenses
ofeducationofdaughterofplaintiffandhermaintenance.Itiswrongtosuggest
thatmyfatherhadarrangedmoneyforthemarriageofRashmipriortohisdeath.
ItiswrongtosuggestthatRashmiwasdoingthejobsince2005to2010,priorto
hermarriageandwasearninghandsomeamount.ItiswrongtosuggestthatMs.
Rashmiusedtobearherentireexpensesandalsosavedmoneyforhermarriage.It
is wrong to suggest that Ms. Neelam has left her jwellary when she left her
matrimonialhomeinyear2005.Itiswrongtosuggestthatherjwellarywasleft
withmymother.ItiswrongtosuggestthatthesaidjwellarywasgiventoMs.
Rashmiinhermarriagebyme.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmybrotherusedtobeat
theplaintiffafterconsumingdrugsandhenceshewasunabletoresidewithhim.It

iswrongtosuggestthatmymotherwasnothavinganyrighttoexecuteEx.DW1/
B.
FurthercrossexaminationofDW1isdeferred.

(RO&AC)

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.26/15
16.04.2015
Pr:

Counselforplaintiff.
Freshvakalatnamafiledonbehalfofplaintiff.Itbetakenonrecord.
Counsel for plaintiff submits that matter is likely to be settled

betweentheparties.
Atrequest,putupforsettlementifanyon30.05.15.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.334/14
16.04.2015
DW:1:StatementofSh.Bobby@BhupeshS/oShHarishChand(recalledfor
crossexamination)
OnSA
XXXXbySh.RohitArora,counselforplaintiffs.
Iacquaintedwiththeplaintiffforthelast45years.Myaffidavitwasready
byme.Vol.myaffidavitwasreadybymyAdvocateundermyinstructions.Iam
awarewiththecontentsofmyaffidavit.Theaffidavitwaspreparedinthechamber
ofmycounselandwassignedbeforetheOathcommissioner.DefendantNo.2is
mywife.ItiscorrectthatmywifehadfiledonecomplaintatPSJyotiNagaron
18.06.12whereshehadlevelledanallegationagainsttheplaintiffNo.1and2that
theyhadkidnappedme.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmywifehadfiledfalseand
frivolouscomplaintagainstplaintiffNo.1and2becausetheywereaskingfortheir
moneywhichtheyhadgiventome.MymobileNo.8744990775.Iamusingthe
sameforthelasttwoyears.Beforethis,Iwasusingthisnumber9953531093.I
alsousedthisnumber9997255943.Vol.butIdonotremembertheexactnumber.
IdonotknowAmarSingh.ItiswrongtosuggestthatAmarsinghismymaternal
uncleofplaintiffsandIknowhimasIcalledhimontelephone.Idonotknow
RahulSaxena.Vol.MightbeIknowhimbyface.Intheyear2012,Iwentto
Kashipurforsomework,howeverearlierIdidnotinformmyfamilymembers
about the same but after 67 days, I informed my family members about my

whereabouts.ItiswrongtosuggestthatIwasnotgonetoKashipurandIwasin
Delhihoweverinordertoputpressureupontheplaintiffs,Ialongwithmyfamily
membersfiledthefalseandfrivolouscomplaintagainstthemsothattheywould
notaskfortheirmoney.Idonotrememberthestatusofthecomplaintfiledbymy
wifeatPSJyotiNagar.Idonotrememberwhethermywifehadfollowedupthe
proceedingsofthesaidcomplaint.Idonotknowwhymywifefiledthecomplaint
against the plaintiff alleging that they had kidnapped me. Vol. AS such, the
plaintiffscametomyhouseandIwentagainwiththemandthatiswhy,therewas
amiscommunicationaboutofwhichmywifemighthavemadethesaidcomplaint.
Iamdoingjob.EarlierIwasdoingbusinesswithmyfather.Iamdoingjobforthe
yearthreeyearsasasalesmaninStoln.Itiswrongtosuggestthatintheyear2012,
IrequestedtheplaintiffsforsumofRs.2,50,000/asIsufferedfinancelossinmy
business.ItiswrongtosuggestthatIusedtogetfinancialhelpfromtheplaintiff
sometimetotime.ItiswrongtosuggestthatIamdeposingfalsely.
(RO&AC)

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.166/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Ms.BabitaSharma,counselforplaintiff.
CounselfordefendantwithDW1.
DW1 examined, partly cross examined and discharged. Further

crossexaminationofDW1isdeferredatrequest.
EvidencebywayofaffidavitofAnilTyagifiled.Copysupplied.
Put up for further cross examination of DW1 and remaining
defendantevidenceon12.05.15.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.334/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Sh.RohitArora,counselforplaintiff.
Sh.H.P.Rao,CounselfordefendantwithDW1.
DW1crossexaminedanddischarged.
Counselfordefendantsubmitsthatnootherwitnessremainstobe

examinedthereforedefendantevidencemaybeclosed.
Inviewofsubmissionsmadebycounselfordefendant,defendant
evidencestandsclosed.
Putupforfinalargumentson02.05.15.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.35/15
16.04.2015
Pr:

Proxycounselforplaintiff.
Atrequest,putupforconsiderationon20.04.15.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.147/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Counselforplaintiff.
Counselfordefendant.
Atthejointrequest,putupforfinalargumentson17.04.15at2PM.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.26/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

CounselforDH.
NoneforJD.
Sh.KamalKumarPandey,Advocate/courtauctioneer.
In response to the court notice, Sh. Kamal Kumar Pandey,

Advocate /court auctioneer appointed by the Honble High Court of Delhi for
karkardoomaCourtsispresentinperson.
On08.01.15,thesuitpropertyi.e.shopbearingNo.11and12,DDA
Market,B1NearDTCBusStandNo.212,NandNagri,Delhi93andH.No.
B1/303,NandNagri,Delhi93wasattachedandattachmentwarrantsinrespectof
suit property was issued. The suit property was attached in view of order dt.
08.01.15andprayerismadeforauctionofthesuitpropertyforsatisfactionofthe
decree.DHhasprayedforfixingthedateforproclamationofthesaleofthesuit
property.Requestisallowed.
Issuewarrantsofproclamationofthesalebywayofauctionofthe
suitpropertyi.e.shopbearingNo.11and12,DDAMarket,B1NearDTCBus
StandNo.212,NandNagri,Delhi93andH.No.B1/303,NandNagri,Delhi93
tobeaffixedonthecourtdooronfilingofPFfor05.05.15.Proclamationofthe
salebemadebybeatofdrumsondepositingofnecessarychargeswhichshallbe
heldon05.05.15andspotvisitbythelearnedcourtauctioneeronthesamedayi.e
05.05.15ondepositingthenecessarycharges.Theauctionwillbeheldatthesite

bythelearnedcourtauctioneeron30.05.15.Auctionbeconductedasperrulesand
reportbefurnishedtothiscourton02.06.15.Copyofthisorderbegivendastito
counselforDHaswellascourtauctioneer.
SHO of the concerned PS is directed to render all the possible
assistancetothelearnedcourtauctioneerincarryingouttheorderofthiscourt.
Sh.KamalKumarPandeyisappointedasthecourtauctioneerfor
carryingoutthe auction proceedingsinview ofappointmentbyHonbleHigh
CourtofDelhiforKKDcourts.
Since this court has appointed a court auctioneer, it will be
appropriateiftheauctioneerisentrustedwiththetaskofpublicationtobeeffected
inthenewspaperStatesmen.
Thefeeoftheauctioneerisfixedat2%oftheauctionamount.DHis
directed to deposit Rs. 10,000/ on account with the court auctioneer for the
purposeofmeetingtheexpensesinrelationtocarryingoutpublicnoticeinthe
newspaper.
Listthematterforcomplianceon02.06.15.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

ExNo.09/15
16.04.2015
Pr:

CounselforDH.
Atrequest,putupforwithdrawingofthepetitionon27.04.15.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.435/14
16.04.2015
FiletakenuptodayonanapplicationfiledfiledbyplaintiffU/o9Rule9
CPC.
Pr:

Counselforapplicant.
Heard.
IssuenoticeoftheapplicationtodefendantonfilingofPF/RCfor

14.05.15.Stepsbetakenwithinaweek.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.55/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Counselforplaintiff.
Counselfordefendant.
NewlyImpleadeddefendantNo.4inperson.
Inthiscase,issuehasalreadybeenframedandPW/plaintiffhasbeen

crossexaminedbydefendantNo.1to3.
Evidencebywayofaffidavitofplaintifffiled.Copysupplied.
Put up for cross examination of plaintiff and remaining PE on
16.05.15.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

KishanLal
V/s
AshishPathak
16.04.2015
Freshsuitreceivedbywayofassignment.Itbecheckedandregistered.
Pr:

Proxycounselforplaintiff.
Atrequest,putupforconsiderationon17.04.15.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.446/14
16.04.2015
FiletakenuptodayonanapplicationU/o39Rule2AofCPCfiledby
plaintiff.
Pr:

Counselforapplicant.
Heard.
IssuenoticeoftheapplicationtodefendantonfilingofPF/RCfor

datealreadyfixed.Stepsbetakenwithintwodays.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.469/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Counselforplaintiff.
EvidencebywayofaffidavitofPWalongwithaffidavitU/s65Bof

theIndianEvidenceAct,1872filed.
Putupforexparteevidenceon16.05.15.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.372/14
16.04.2015
Pr:

Plaintiffinpersonwithcounsel.
Nonefordefendantsincemorningdespiterepeatedcalls.
Itisalready2:10PM,fourthcallsincemorning.
ThecaseisfixedforcrossexaminationofPWbutnonehasappeared

onbehalfofdefendantsincemorningtocrossexaminethewitness.
Inviewofabovesaidfactsandcircumstances,defendantisproceeded
exparteandrighttocrossexaminethePWbydefendantisclosed.
PutupforremainingPEon08.05.15.

(G.N.PANDEY)
ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

Вам также может понравиться