Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 1 of 23
A:
Each week Law of Self Defense staff review self-defense court decisions from around the country. Those
we find most interesting are summarized in each weeks Law of Self Defense: Weekly Law Report. The
cases are organized by state, in alphabetical order, first listed in summary fashion in the Table of Contents
and then by individual case.
Q:
The Law of Self Defense is well-known for translating the legalese of self-defense law into plain
English easily understood by non-lawyers, as you do in your books, seminars, online training, and
blog posts. Is the same effort made to translate the cases in these Weekly Reports into plain
English?
A:
Im afraid not. Translating legalese into plain English takes a lot of effort, and simply isnt tenable for
weekly reports of this type. Therefore we consider these reports a graduate-level product, for people
who already have a solid understanding of the legal principles of self-defense law. To get up to speed we
encourage you to start with our best-selling book, The Law of Self-Defense, 2nd Edition, (also available
from Amazon in print and Kindle, the NRA Store, and Gun Digest) which covers all 50 states at a high level.
You may also consider one of our state-specific live Law of Self Defense Seminars held all over the country
or state-specific online training classes. And, of course, theres always the Law of Self Defense Blog.
Q:
A:
No. Many cases that involve issues of self-defense also involve other issues unrelated to self-defense; we
only summarize the portions of the cases that directly involve issues of self-defense law. What we do
include are the case citation, a list of the key self-defense law issues covered in that case, the date of the
decision, and the text of the decision that discusses the specific self-defense laws of interest.
The goal is to provide the reader with an efficient way of deciding if they want to read the entire case.
Q:
A:
Every case summarized here is hyperlinked back to the full-length version of that case. We do, in fact,
strongly encourage you to read the entire text of any cases of particular interest to you, as that is the best
way to understand the fullest context of the courts decisions.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 2 of 23
Table of Contents
FLORIDA
Page
Bretherick v. State, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1470 (FL Supreme Court 2015)
Key issues:
self-defense immunity, burden of proof and standard of evidence
Defendant at pre-trial self-defense immunity hearing has burden of proving self-defense by
a preponderance of the evidence
Date: July 9, 2015
INDIANA
Quarles v. State, 2015 Ind. App. Unpub. LEXIS 747 (IN Ct. App. 2015)
17
Key issues:
Self-defense, elements
Burden of production, on the defendant
Burden of persuasion, on the State, beyond a reasonable doubt
Innocence, first aggressor, mutual combat
Innocence, regaining innocence, withdrawal
20
Key issues:
Self-defense, elements
Burden of production, on the defendant
Date: July 9, 2015
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 3 of 23
FLORIDA
Bretherick v. State, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1470 (FL Supreme Court 2015)
Key issues:
self-defense immunity, burden of proof and standard of evidence
Defendant at pre-trial self-defense immunity hearing has burden of proving self-defense by a
preponderance of the evidence
Date:
July 9, 2015
Decision:
The issue in this case arises from Florida's "Stand
AS IT DOES AT TRIAL?
Fla. Const.[2]
from prosecution.[1]
Page 4 of 23
gestures.
Page 5 of 23
actions.
reasonable.
(Footnotes omitted.)
explained as follows:
Page 6 of 23
she "would find that the trial court erred in placing the
Id. at 344.
ANALYSIS
Page 7 of 23
part as follows:
3d at 462.
Court explained:
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 8 of 23
Id. at 458.
Id.
Yet, the only mention of the burden of proof in the
Regarding the applicable procedure for claiming
criminal trial.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 9 of 23
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 10 of 23
3d at 462.
immunity laws.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 11 of 23
legislature.
Peterson.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 12 of 23
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 13 of 23
plaintiff).
It is so ordered.
concur.
DETERMINED.
CONCLUSION
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 14 of 23
Accordingly, I dissent.
61 So. 3d 424, 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); see also Fla.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 15 of 23
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 16 of 23
INDIANA
Quarles v. State, 2015 Ind. App. Unpub. LEXIS 747 (IN Ct. App. 2015)
Key issues:
Self-defense, elements
Burden of production, on the defendant
Burden of persuasion, on the State, beyond a reasonable doubt
Innocence, first aggressor, mutual combat
Innocence, regaining innocence, withdrawal
Date:
July 7, 2015
Decision:
Case Summary
in the fight too. Tr. p. 193. Danielle got out of her car
affirm.
attempt to stop the fight and pulled her car near the
front entrance of the bar. Id. at 76. But the fighting
continued.
Page 17 of 23
35-41-3-2 provides:
However, a person:
necessary.
conviction.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 18 of 23
Affirmed.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 19 of 23
TEXAS
Bonner v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 7013 (TX Ct. App. 2015)
Key issues:
Self-defense, elements
Burden of production, on the defendant d
Date:
July 9, 2015
Decision:
By one issue, appellant Dedrick Roy Bonner alleges
charge. We affirm.
Bonner testified during the jury trial and stated that
I. Background
Page 20 of 23
justified:
....
actor was:
charge.
46.02; or
(B) possessing or transporting a weapon in violation
A. Standard of Review
of Section 46.05.
[...]
B. Applicable Law
....
immediately necessary:
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 21 of 23
....
Id. at (b)(2),(3).
member.
C. Analysis
State's assertions.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 22 of 23
S.W2d at 174.
S.W.3d at 51-52. Johnson had gone to his exgirlfriend's residence looking to speak with her, and
III. Conclusion
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 www.lawofselfdefense.com
Page 23 of 23