Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Optik
journal homepage: www.elsevier.de/ijleo
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 13 June 2011
Accepted 12 November 2011
OCIS:
(060.1660) Coherent communications
(060.2330) Fibre optics communications
a b s t r a c t
This paper forces on the monitoring and compensation of optical telecommunication channels. An adaptive bre nonlinearity precompensation (AFNP) scheme is proposed to solve the bre nonlinearity in
coherent optical orthogonal frequency division multiplexed networks (CO-OFDM). Optical performance
monitoring (OPM) at end-terminals is applied to channel identication in this paper. It is considered to
be high efciency and a cost efcient technique in low-dynamic system.
2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Fibre nonlinearity
Coherent optical orthogonal frequency
division multiplexed networks
Optical performance monitoring
Precompensation
1. Introduction
Coherent optical orthogonal frequency division multiplexed
networks (CO-OFDM) transmission technique has gained much
interest in the eld of optical bre communication recently [16].
It is a serious contender for the future optical bre transmission
systems because it effectively removes the inter-symbol interference from chromatic dispersion (CD) and polarization mode
dispersion (PMD) [2]. This system can apply exible digital signal processing algorithm to compensate the chromatic dispersion,
mitiganting the urge for precise optical chromatic dispersion compensation and reducing the cost of the system construction and
operation. Its unique advantage has become prominent in highspeed and long-haul optical bre transmissions. However, there is
limitation on the performance in this system. The major reason for
such limitation originates from the nonlinearity impairment (such
as SPM (self-phase modulation), XPM (cross-phase modulation),
FWM (Four-wave-mixing) and so on) in the optical bre. Due to
compact distribution of sub-carriers, it is more severe than that in
the traditional system.
72
E{Y (f ) X (f )}
nn (f ) = E Y (f )
2 X(f )
E{X(f ) }
c
2
fLD
Dt f 2
D
d=1
nn (d)
2
D E{Y (d)X (d)}
X(d)
d=1
E{|X(d)|2 }
(1)
(2)
In the following, an estimate of nn (f) comprises two contributions: a noise-like signal due to non-linear effects of power Nnl
(4)
We integrate over the used frequency band, and work with signal powers rather than spectral power densities over the discrete
sub-carriers d:
N
=
S
(3)
73
for poor extinction ratios), OFDM has a 1.6-dB advantage over AFDN
at all OSNRs. Plots of the variance of the symbols for OSNRs up to
20 dB suggest that a BER oor does not occur for OFDM.
In Fig. 4, we compare the performance among the three schemes
under various trafc of services using the FPON. The blocking probability (BP) denotes the effectivity for each scheme. The gure shows
that the BP without AFNP are higer than those two schemes unless
under heavy trafc load (700 Erlang). Actually, on this occasion,
processing capacity is the biggest bottleneck in AFNP. The system
with AFNP also performs similar to back to back under low trafc
load, and even under middle, it still remains 99% restoration probability in 600 Erlang. The service of FPON in normal use actually is
the just one who has low-dynamic and high stability feature.
4. Conclusions
In this paper, we have shown that the CO-OFDM network is
extended for the adaptive bre nonlinearity precompensation to
deal with optical impairments from nonlinearity. The AFNP extends
an OPM module to monitor the optical power and identify system
compensation. Simulation shows that the AFNP achieves better
performance under low-dynamic. Therefore, the AFNP is a suitable nonlinearity precompensation system in specied CO-OFDM
networks.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by The National Basic Research
(973) Program of China (No. 2011CB302702), The National 863
Program (No. 2011AA01A205).
3. Simulation results
In this section, we evaluate the AFNP using the FPON topology.
In order to achieve a realistic network load, lightpath provisioning
requests are dynamically generated according to a Poison process
and uniformly distributed among the source-destination pairs. The
data rate is 10 Gb/s and the block length is 1024 bits, giving D = 128
sub-carriers of OFDM symbols in an optical bandwidth of 5 GHz
with 4-quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM). Each link comprises number of uncompensated 80-km spans. The bre has a loss
of 0.2 dB/km, a nonlinearity coefcient, n2 , of 2.6 1020 m2 /W, and
an effective cross section of 80 m2 . The optical ampliers compensate for the 16-dB bre loss in each span, and have a noise gure
(NF) of 6 dB. The output power of each amplier is controlled to set
the input power to each 80-km bre span. The coherent receiver
used a 10-mW local oscillator laser and is noiseless (Fig. 2).
Fig. 3 plots BER versus SNR for both systems in the 4000-km
single link (from Urumchi to Beijing) and back to back system. For
a BER of 10-3 (which can be improved by Forward-Error Correction
coding), the AFND system requires a 3 dB better SNR. This advantage
of OFDM over AFDN reduces to zero for lower BERs, but only if
the AFDN systems threshold is optimized to take advantage of the
low variance of the zero-bits for high extinction ratios. If the AFDN
threshold is placed midway between the 1 and 0 levels (as it would
References
[1] B. Fu, R. Hui, Fiber chromatic dispersion and polarization-mode dispersion
monitoring using coherent detection, IEEE Photon Technol. Lett. 17 (2005)
15611563.
[2] W. Shieh, X. Yi, Y. Ma, Y. Tang., Optical performance monitoring in coherent
optical OFDM networks, Opt. Express 15 (2007) 99369947.
[3] W. Shieh, C. Athaudage, Coherent optical orthogonal frequency division multiplexing, Electron. Lett. 42 (10) (2006 May) 587589.
[4] X. Yi, W. Shieh, Y. Tang, Phase estimation for coherent optical OFDM, Photon
Technol. Lett. 19 (June (12)) (2007) 919921.
[5] Y. Qiao, Z. Wang, Y. Ji., Blind frequency offset estimation based on cyclic prex
and virtual subcarriers in CO-OFDM system, Chin. Opt. Lett. 8 (9) (2010).
[6] X. Liu, Y. Qiao, Y. Ji., Electronic compensator for 100-Gb/s PDM-CO-OFDM longhaul transmission systems, Chin. Opt. Lett. 9 (2011) 3.
[7] T. Li, I. Kaminow (Eds.), Optical Fiber Telecommunications IVB., Academic, San
Diego, CA, 2002, ch. 13.
[8] C. Par, A. Villeneuve, P.-A. Belanger, N.J. Doran, Compensating for dispersion
and the nonlinear Kerr effect without phase conjugation, Opt. Lett. 21 (1996)
459461.
[9] J. McNicol, M. OSullivan, K. Roberts, A. Comeau, D. McGhan, L. Strawczynski,
Electrical domain compensation of optical dispersion, Tech. Dig. Conf. Opt. Fiber
Commun. 5 (2005) 269271.
[10] D.C. Kilper, R. Bach, D.J. Blumenthal, D. Einstein, T. Landolsi, L. Ostar, M. Preiss,
A.E. Willner, Optical performance monitoring, J. Lightwave Technol. 22 (2004)
294304.
[11] A.J. Lowery, J. Armstrong, Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing for dispersion compensation of long-haul optical systems, Opt. Express 14 (2006)
20792084.
[12] G.P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 2nd ed., Academic, San Diego, CA, 1995.
[13] A.J. Lowery, J. Armstrong, Fiber nonlinearity mitigation in optical links that use
OFDM for dispersion compensation, IEEE Photon Technol. Lett. 19 (19) (2007)
15561558.