Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1
l
!
!
-- - .
1U
DA
NIEI-c),BOGDEN
nitedsmtesAttorney
......F
1F(
7E1VE(
)
- .t
yggh
yyg(
;N
(;f
)pJ'1!1F'i
lfiliii?0Fil?ESORE)t
$
F
i- JL -52011
) I .IC
2 J.GREGORY DAMM
sis
an.
tUnited StatesA tlerney
3 A33s3
Lta
sVegasBlvd.South,Smte5000
,
4 Teleghone:(702)388-6336
Facslmile:(702)388-6418
5
l
'
l
!
j
j
j
(.
jrju)
r
yjj-k
),kj
).
r4rtjgt
''
q-tjg(
'''
iy..,i(
;cy
y.
rg);h:i
t,.
,,
$(
;A
.
qpFrihtl!a/
2....=J'='
='
,-=''.
'
====7''--== .
-=---''-''
7
-
00 0-
9 UNITED STATES0FAMERICA,
10
Plaintiff,
1l
vs.
12 W ILLIAM S.REED ,
RICHARD C.NEISW ONGER,and
l3 W ENDELL L.W AITE,
14
Defendants.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:ll-cr- ..'
l
VIOLATIONS:
18U.S.C.j371-ConspiracytoDefraudthe
UnitedStates
18U.S.C.j 1341-M ailFraud
18U.S.C.j 1343-W ireFraud
16
18U.S.C.371-ConspiracytoCommitM ail
Fraud and W ire Fraud
17
l8
D efeatTax
19
20
'
18U.S.C.jl028A(a)(1)-Aggravatedldentity
21
Theft
23 . . .
24
...
25
...
26
...
1
.
U N IT E D ST A T E S D IST R IC T C O U R T
D ISTR IC T O F N E V A D A
22
FrI:'))
j.rkTyj
yjj
;
!- ----
p
i
1
2
3
N EISW ON G ER
18U.S.C.j37l-ConspiracytoDefTaudthe
U nited States
'
9-14
15
18 U .S.C.j371-ConspiracytoCommit
M ailFraud and W ire Fraud
30
18U.S.C.j1956(h)-MoneyLaundering
conspiracy
W ILLIAM S.REED
18U.S.C.j37l-Conspiracyto Defraudthe
10
U nited States
l1
2-8
18U.S.C.j1341-M ailFraud
12
9-14
13
15
18U.S.C.j371-ConspiracytoCornmit
M ailFraud and W ire Fraud
14
16-29
26U.S.C.j7201-AttempttoEvadeor
15
D efeatTax
16
30
C onspiracy
17
l9
l
p
20
RICHARD C.
CharRe
D efendant
2-8
l8
I
I
31-32
W ENDELLL W AITE
.
18U.S.C.j1028A(a)(1)-Aggravated
u entity Theft
18U.S.C.j371-ConspiracytoDefraudthe
United States
INTR OD U CTION
23
mj-jjeparties
24
25 engaged in salesand m arketing venturesand resided in LasV egms,N evada, O n or aboutN ovem ber
26 l3,1996,theFederalTradeCommission(''FTC'
')filedacomplaintagainstdefendantltlcllAlo C.
2 falseandmisleadingincomeclaimsamongotherdeceptivepractices,inviolationofsection5(a)of
3 the FTC Act. Specifically,the FTC alleged thatdefendantRICHARD C.NEISW ONGER was
9 residence in Las Vegas, N evada. DefendantW ILLIAM S. RE ED w asadm itted to practice law in
10
the State of Colorado from approximately 1975 until on or aboutAugust4, 1997. Defendant
13 Vegas,Nevada. DefendantW ENDELL L.W AITE wasa licensed Certitied Public Accountant
n e Entities
17
(4)From atleastNovember4,1998,andcontinuingthroughatleastJuly17,2006,defendant
21
,..
Treasurerandoirector;and,Ai'e,Inc.,wasnmnedtheRegisteredAgent.Asorvay1,2008,the
active status ofthisentity w as revoked.
2 w ithN evada Secretary ofStateto changeA P(JI'SResidentA gentfrom ''LegalForm s+''to A PG ,Inc.
3 A sofN ovem ber 1,2008,the active statusofthis entity wasrevoked,
5 one A PG I entity actively engaged in im plem enting an asset and incom e concealm ent schem e,
6 controlled at leastone bank accountused to execute operations and receive proceeds on behalf of
7 A PG Iand,asanam ed ofticer,engaged in atleastonebusinessentem rise asA PGIin partnership with
10
licensed CPA . From at lemst O ctober 23, 1998, and continuing through at least July 17, 2006,
businessentity,
13
14
W endellW aite'
'.
21
22
leastone entity actively engaged in delivering assetand incom e concealm entschem e developm ent,
23
including m arketing,testim onials,trainings and tax services forAPGM and/or APG I;controlled at
24
lemstone bank accountused to execute services in supportofand to receive revenue derived from
, ..
1.
1 APGM and APGIin partnership with defendantRICH ARD C.NEISW ONGER and defendant
2 W ILLIA M S.R EED .
(16) Despite the attemptcd appearance ofseparation conveyed by the use ofnumerous
10
and by ''consultants''who purchased the ''business opportunity''to sell this asset and incom e
1l concealm entschem e.
12
13
14
15
16
(18)From onoraboutOctober23,1998,andcontinuingthroughatlemstJuly17,2006,APG
22
23 elements ofNevada com orate law , including the use of bearershares as outlined in his book,
@
i
24 BulletproofAssetprotection.ApGfonnedovertwothousand(z,ooolhlevadacorporationsforclients
25 usingdefendantW ILLIAM S.REED asthecorporateoflicerantl/ordirector.APG falselyinformed
!
I
I
26
'
...
(20) APG promoted the falsehood thatone could own and controla corporation and its
assigned assets withoutthatownership and controleverhaving to be acknowledged,and thatene
could hidetheownership and controlofassetsfrom creditors.ThreeAPG versionsofincom oration
wereofferedtoAPG customers:a)theso-calledAssetprotectionCorporation,''usedtoconcealasset
ownership;b)these-calledtt-f'
axSavingsNevadaCczporatitm,''designedto''shiftincome''toNevada
toevadet,
axation;andc)theso-calledIntemationalBusinessComoration(''IBC''),designedtomove
''liquidassets''(cash)offshereanenymouslythroughtheuseofanAPG escrow acceunt.
(21)Aspartofitsscheme,APG openedcozporatebankaccountsusingthenazneoftheclients'
corporations.APG generatedrevenuefrom eachnew incorporation,eachcorporaterenewal,andeach
escrow accounttransaction,
consideration.Theobjectiveofaso-called''fliendly lien''wastodefraudcreditorsbycreatingthe
false im pression thatlittle or no equity w asavailable in a respective client'sproperty. C reating this
false im pression allow ed A PG clients to protect equity in their assets by discouraging bona fide
creditors,including the governm ent,from executing liens on assets thatw ould appear to be overencum bered.
who purchased the APG Program ,typically ata price of $9,800,became APO ''consultants''and
receivedtraining inthemarketing,saleand useoftheAPG schem efrom defendantsRICHARD C.
NEISW ONGER,W ILLIAM S.REED M dW ENDELL L.W AITE.TIZeAPG consultants,inturn,
soldtheA PG assetand incom e concealm entschem eto custom ers,referredto as''clients''w ho desired
to distancethem selvesf'
rom theirliabilitiesand to concealtheirassetsfrom currentasw ellaspotential
litigants,creditors,govermnentagencies,and the couds. A PG consultantsreceived a portion ofthe
proceeds from theirsale ofthe APG assetand incom e concealm entschem e.
(a)
frequently occuning price point was $9,800.The receiver reported to the FTC,estimated gross
receipts from sales ofthe A PG business opportunity program to consultants,in excess ofnineteen
million($19M)dollarsduringthisperiod.ThisIiguredoesnotincludeproductsalesgeneratedbythe
oonsultants.
i
E
l
2
(b)
From tm oraboutOctober23,1998,andcontinuingatleastthroughJanuaz.
y
(c)
6 APG,causedtobeopenedatleastninehundred(900)disguisedownershipcorporatebankaccounts
.
9 solesignatoryonatleastsixhundrednineteen (619)oftheseaccounts.
10
(d)
ll million ($63M ) dollars in deposits and perfonned over sixty-two million ($62M ) dollars in
12
withdrawalsthrough one ofthe bank accountsdesignated by APG during thistim e asan ''escrow''
13
14
'
(e)
l8
(9
From onoraboutOctober23,1998,andcontinuingatleasttlurughJanuary
19 4,2007,APG preparedatleastfotlrhundredtwentpsix(426)fraudulentencumbrancesintheform
20 of so-called ''friendly liens''to be tiled by clients. The dcklla.
r am ount of these fraudulent
purposew 4sto createthe appearance ofreduced equity availableto bona fide creditors,including the
24
25
...
26
...
I
1
(g)
From JanuarythroughDecember2004,atleastninetpthreeclient''corporate''
3 $300 referralpaymentwas m ade by APG to defendantW ENDELL L.W AITE foreach ofthe
4
6 RIC
and selling the APG business opportunity scheme through m isrepresentations and om issions of
10 m aterialfacts.
l1
12 events occurred in the lives ofdefendants RIC H A RD C .N EISW O N G ER ,W ILLIA M S.R EED
13 and W END ELL L .W AITE :
14
(a)
15 intheUnitedStatesTM Courttopersonalincometaxliabilitydeficiencies(understatement)inexcess
16 ofthirteenmilliondollars($13M )forhis2001throughhis2006personalincometixreturnsastiled.
17
(b)
(o)
23
24
(d)
Onatleastfourseparatedatesoftiling,namelyAugust29,2007,
.December
10
Nevada.ThecombinedfederaltaxliabilitiesfortheseAPC;clientsexceededfourteenmillion($14M )
dollarsfortax years 1988 tluoug.
h 2006.
C O UN T O N E
Conspiracy
(18U.S.C.j371)
(30) Paragraphs cme through twentpnine are re-alleged and incorporated herein by
reference.
w ILLIA M s REE D
confederate,arld agree togetherand with each otherand with other individuals both known and
unknown to theGrand Jury todefraudtheUnited Statesbydeceit,craR,trickeryanddishonestm eans
forthepurposeofim ped.ing,im pairing,obstructing,and defeatingthelawfulgovenunentfunctions
ProtectionCorporations,''lnternationalBusinessComorations('IBCs''),ItTaXSavings
N evada Corpom tionss''dfsguised corporate ownership bank accounts and so-called
11
InternalRevenueService(''lRS'').
The lncorporation Devices
(b)
(o)
Records indicate that for a period oftim e,APG paid defendant W ENDELL L.
(e)
Onceacorporation wasformedandsoldtoaclient,APG,attherequestor
corporation. '
I'he majority ofthese accotmtswould listdefendatltW ILLIAM S.
RE ED msthe sole authorized signatory on the account, Anyone else w ho w anted to
12
'
W ILLIAM S.REED'Sfacsimilesignaturewouldbesenttotheclientfortheirusein
accessing any fundsin theirdisguised ow nership corporate bank account.
(9
APG operatedan''escrow''accotmtintowhichclientscouldwiretheirmoney,
moved money in or out of the country.'' APG charged fees for these
(g)
n rough the use ofvmious means,to include the use ofmailand wire
(h)
detined the tictitious loan and repayment terms Letween the APG client and the
nom ineecorporation.Forthepreparation ofthesetw o dooum ents,A PG w ould charge
the client a fee. For an additionalcharge,A PG w ould prepare a Satisfaction of
13
(i)
would simply subkactany loan/m ortgagesfrom theestim ated property value. This
wouldbethemnountofequityin (thelhome-theamotmtofthe'FriendlyLien'''.The
instructionsfurtherinformed the clientsthatthe so-called ''friendly lien''should be
filed atthe County Recorder's Oftice where the propcrty w aslocated.
()
W hetheritwasforpttrchasesofApGcomorationsorso-called''friendlyliens,''
(k)
selltoindividuals,o icilyforsg,8oo,theopportunitytopromoteAPG'Sproductsand
services. This program w as m arketed by defendants,W ILLIA M S.R EED and
R IC H A RD C .N EISW O N G ER ,w ith m isleading arld deceptive representations.
(l)
14
'
p
I
!
!
i
i
!
i
!
;
j
advertisementsandbegintheprocessofspeakingwithApG salesrepresentativesypaid
I
1
I
@
1
conductwasdesignedtoconvincetheprospectiveconsultanttobuytheAPG business
OPPOIXUIAiW program .
(n)
'
10
ll
12
(o)
l3
credit card, specialfinancing, or other m eans. This fee allow ed the consultantto
14
access APG 'S prom otional m aterials,products, and services in order to sell these
15
16
17
W EN D ELL L.W A ITE in LasV egas,N evada,orthey could receive thetraining via
18
19
(p)
20
21
often m ade payable to nom inee entities that defendant W ILLIA M S. REED
22
23
(q)
24
25
paid directly to A PG overthe w holesale am ount,less any applicable fees and service
26
requests,w ould be paid by A PG and sentby regular m ailpayable to the prim ary
'
InadditiontospeakingwithApGrepresentativesandlisteningtopre-recorded
ApG setwholesaleandsuggestedretailpricesfortheirincorporationpackages,
15
consultant. Either the consultants orthe clients of the consultants could provide
paymentforthese selwicesvia check,creditcard,m oney order,orotherapproved
m ethodsofpaym ent.APO usedthefictitiousbusinessnameordba Western Business
Servicesforcreditcard sales.
*
in avariet'
y ofways. DefendantW ENDELL L.W AITE spoke atAPG consultant
trainingsem inarsiheappearedinanApG promotionalvideofeaturingRobertW agner;
he appeared and w asreferred to in printed brochuresand prom otionalm aterials;and,
hespokewithAPG clients/consultantsbytelephone,answeringgeneraltaxquestions
for no charge, DefendantW ENDELL L.W AITE and APG formed a ''strategic
alliance''to marketso-called tCTA'
K Savings Nevada Cop orations''through APG'S
network ofconsultants. DefendantW EN DELL L.W AITE wmstheCPA specifically
selected to do business with APG. Defendants RICHARD C.NEISW O NGER,
W ILLIAM S-REED andW ENDELL L.W AITE,workedin concerttodefraudthe
United States,including theIRS.
The Prom otionalM aterials
(s)
ahandfulofpeople...theywantprotectionandprivacyfrom outsideIawsuits,lawyers,andtheIRS.''
@
inform ation.'
''
N evadaistheonly statewithoutareciprocalagreem entwiththeIRSto exchangetax
'
''Nevadansdon'tlikegovernmentasageneralrule,especiallywhenitcomestotaxes.''
''N evada isthe only state thatprovides al1the elem entsin itscorporate 1aw thatAsset
5 has possession ofthe Bearer Share ow nsthe com pany. A nd w hen the BearerSharesaze outofthe
6 client'spossession(perhapslockedupinhisparents'safedepositbox)hecantnzthftlllytestifythathe
7 doesnotown theNevada corpor
ation,''
!
8
9 to considerprotecting yotlrassets.''
10
11
''W hatajudgecan'
ttind,hecan'tseize.And,whenaskedaboutyourassets,youwant
12
13
14 agencysuchasthelRSorcustomsservice,youmaywantthemaximum assetprotectionaffordedby
15 an offshorecorporation4,
I
I
I6
''However,ifyou'vebeentargetedbytheIRS,orareroutinelyinvolvedinlitigation,
19
20
'
''OnceanassetisoutofreachofmyfriendthefederaljudgeandtheIRS,it'ssafe.And,'
evenmoreimportant,iftheyneverlearntheassetisoffshore,there'snoreasonforanyonetotalkabout
:!1 it.''
22
'A SSET PROTECTION tailored to the individualand fam ily uses a com bination of
againstIR S atlacks.''
25
...
26
,..
17
''Butforthosewhodesireorneedthemaximum injudgment-proofassetprotection,
especially from aU ,S.Govemm entagency,werecomm end an offshore corporation calledan tIBC',
anlntem ationalBusinessCompany.ln addition to totalanonym ityand atax-free environment,this
offshore corporation providesyourclients with COM PLETB PROTECTION AOAINST ASSET
SEIZURE BY THE IRS orothergovermnentagencies.''
''Ifyou stop and think aboutit,there are m any reasonssom eone m ightwantthislevel
of asset protection. Som eone in or anticipating a dispute w ith the IRS to be resolved tlzrough
prolonged negotiation orextended installm entpaym ents.Som eonewho hasgoneyearswithoutliling
taxes.Someoneinorinvestedinabusinessregulatedbyandsubjecttofinesfrom theFTC,theFDA,
the SEC,orastateagency.Som eoneusing tax sheltersthatm ightbechallenged in thefutures''
.
incom e to multiple Nevada Corporations owned by separate extended family members to take
''17ofthemanysecretsyouwilllearn...//6)How tocreatea''friendlylien''toprotect
yourhomeorotherrealesotefrom any'courtjudgment,collection,lawyer,orgovernmentagency.''
18
O vertA cts
(33)lnfartheranceoftheconspiracyandtoeffecttheobjectsthereof,defendantsRICHARD
C.NEISW ONGER,W ILLIAM S.REED,arldW ENDELL L.W AITE andtheirco-conspirators
com mitted thefollowing overtacts,among others,in theDistrictofNevada and elsewhere:
(a)
ProtectionCzroup,Inc.,andjoinedtogethertofonnthetirstboardofdirectorsofthe
A PG entity.
(b)
(c)
individualfor$2,500.
(d)
shipment(3,000oopies)ofhisself-publishedbook,BulletproofAssetProtection.ln
thisbook,defendantW ILLIAM S.REED espoused hispurportedly ''bulletproop'
strategy ofusing disguised ownership com orations and false conveyances to hide
mssetsand incom efrom creditors,specifically the federalgovernm entand theIRS.
(e)
individualfor$9,800.
(9
19
(g)
individualfor$9,800.
(h)
OnoraboutJune26,2002,APG causedapressreleasetoappearatleasttwice
in the Las V egas m edia,alm ouncing a strategic alliance betw een A sset Protection
(i)
()
(k)
disguised ow nership com orate bank accountfor a client with an opening depositof
$100.
(1)
(n)
KSTaX Savings Nevada Com oration'' for a client and paid $300 to defendant
W E ND ELL L.W A ITE.
20
I
i
1
I
(o)
OnoraboutAugust7,2003,APG soldaconsultantbusincssopportunitytoan
individualfor$9,800.
(.
p)
a client,with an encumbranceamotmtof$350,000.
(q)
(r)
an individualfor$9,800.
(s)
10
11
L.W A ITE .
12
(t)
13
14
(u)
15
16
$250
17
(v)
18
19
20
21
(x)
22
Ks-f'ax Savings N evada Com oration'' for a client and paid $300 to defendant
23
W EN D ELL L.W A IT E.
24
(y)
25
individualfor$9,800.
On oraboutMarch25,2004,APG soldaconsultantbusinessopportunityto
0noraboutAugust30,2004,APG formedorcausedtobeformedaso-called
26
OnoraboutJarmm'y20,2005,APG formedorcausedtobeformedaso-called
OnoraboutFebrual'y7,2005,APO formedorcausedtobeformedaso-called
.. .
21
1
!
(z)
Onoraboutlune14,2005,APG createdaso-called''friendlylien''foraclient,
Corporation''fora client.
$75,325.
10
1l
controlof the APG business and its aftiliates and subsidiaries,A PG com m itted the
12
follow ing overt acts in the ongoing prom otion of the asset protection schem e as
l3
14
i.
15
16
17
18
ii.
19
newlyformedassetprotectioncorporationsbymail(FedEx).
20
iii.
21
22
iv.
23
24
25
...
26
...
22
1
!
v.
new so-called SCTKX SavingsN evada Corporation''w ith the N evada Secretazy
ofState.
vi.
vii.
in theam ountof$1,992.
10
Nevada First Bank for at least four clients using disguised ow nership
11
corporations.
12
ix.
13
14
15
x.
16
17
18
19
20
21
CO UN TS TW O TH R O U G H EIG H T
M ailFraud
22
(18U.S.C.j 1341)
2311
Backzround
24
(34) Theallegationscontainedinparagraphs(l)-(17)lntroduction-ThePartiesandThe
25
Entities ofCount l ofthis Indictm entare hereby re-alleged and incorporated herein as though fully
26
setforth atlength.
23
3 paragraphs (32 (a)) -(32 (s))M anner and M eans -The Incorporation Devioes;The So-called
'
4 dtFriendly Lien'''
,ThetBusinessOpportunities''Program ;and,TheProm otionalM aterialsofCount
8 S.REED,with the intentto defraud,devised and willfully participated in,with knowledge ofits
9
fraudulentnattlretheabove-describedschem eandartificetodefraudandtoobtainmoneyandproperty
11
12
13
l7
C ount
18
Date
July 7, 2006
19
20
Iu less, Texas
21
July 14,2006
22
23
July 17,2006
24
25
26
July 17,2006
'
j '
:
'
July l7,2006
tn(jiana
booksforStarliteFinanciallncorporated,Inc.,to H .R.in
Loveland, O hio
July 17,2006
9
10
11
12
CO U N TS N IN E TH R O UG H FO UR TEEN
W ire Fraud
13
. (18U.S.C.j1343)
14
Backaround
15
(38) n eallegationscontainedinparagraphs(1)-(17)lntroduction-'ThePartiesandThe
16
Entitiesof Count 1 ofthisIndictm entare hereby re-alleged and incorporated herein asthough fully
17 setforth atlength.
18
19
20 paragraphs (32 (a))-(32 (s))M annermld M eans -The Incorporation Devices;The So-called
21 ttyriendly''Lien Scheme;ThetsBujinessOpportunities''Program ;and,ThePromotionalM aterialsof
22
count l ofthis Indictm entare hereby re-alleged and incorporated herein as though fully setforth at
23
length.
24
25
D istrictofN evada and elsew here, thedefendants,RICH ARD C.NEISW ONGER andW ILLIAM
26
s. R EED ,w ith the intent to defraud,,devised and w illftzlly participated in,w ith know ledge ofits
25
Date
'
July 6,2006
10
July 13,2006
1l
July l3,2006
12
July 14,2006
13
July 14,2006
(18U.S.C.9371)
Baokcround
(42) n eallegationscontainedinparagraphs(1)-(17)Introduction-ThePartiesandThe
Entities ofCount1 ofthis Indictm entare hereby re-alleged and incorporated herein asthough fully
setforth atlength.
The Schem e to Defraud
26
ldFriendly''Iwien Scheme;T'
heBusinessOpporttmities''Program ;and,ThePromtltionalM aterialsof
Caunt1efthisIndictm entare hereby re-alleged and incorporated llerein asthough fully setforthat
length.
fraud and wire fraud in violation ofTitle l8,United SutesCode,Sections 1341and 1343. Allin
violation ofTitle 18,United StatesCode,Section 371.
COUNTS SIXTEEN THROUGH TW ENTY-NINE
Incom eTax Evasion & Aidin: and Abettin:
(26U.S.C.j7201& 18U.S.C.j2)
(45) OnoraboutSeptember10,2002,throughonoraboutOctober1,2008,intheDistrict
ofNevada and elsewhere,thedefendant,W ILLIAM S.REED,did willfullyattem ptttlevade and
defeatthe pam entofa largepartofthe incom etmx dueand owingby Jam esDelm isTenito fortax
years 1987-1990,1992-1996 and 1998-2002 to the United States ofAm erica by concealing and
attem pting to conoealfrom the Intem al Revenue Selwice the natlzre and extent of Jam es D ennis
Territo's assets and the location thereof;m aking false statem ents to agents t)fthe IntenaalR evenue
Count
Tax Year
Assessed Tax
Accrued Interest
M ay 2005Total
& Penalties
Balance D ue
16
1987
$15,646.87
$29,428.63
.
$45,075.50
4
5
17
18
19
20
21
1988
1989
1990
1992
1993
22
1994
9
10
23
24
1995
1996
$7,216.79
$2l,469.55
$8,304.44
$1,715.99
$2 549.97
,
$4 274 72
$4,642.89
$5,928.58
$8,345.95
$24,828.70
$9,710.73
$2,153.24
$3,348.93
$3 663.27
$4,170.45
$4,326.01
$15,562.74
$46,298.25
$18,015.l7
$3,869.23
$5,898.90
$7,937.99
$8,813.34
$10,254.59
11
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
$35,441.26
$33,599,07
$91,957.52
$56,009.81
$83,845.26
$8,695.46
$9,741.70
$31,364.10
$17,399.82
$44,136.72
$43,340.77
$123,321.62
$73,409.63
14
25
26
27
28
29
$27,029,86
$110,875.12
15
Totals
$184,206.85
$556,809.57
l2
l3
$372,602.72
16
17
1:
19
CO UN T T HIR.T-Y
M oney Laundering Conspiracy
2()
(18U.S.C.5 1956(h))
'
21
22
23
24
25
28
persons,toconductandattempttoconducttinancialtransactionsaffectinginterstatecomm erce,which
ftmdswere in factderived from spccified unlawfulactivity,thatis,M ailFraud and W ireFraud,in
A1linviolationofTitle18,UnitedStatesCode,j1956t1$.
CO UN T T H IR TY -O N E
A ggravated Identity Theft
(18U.S.C.j1028A)
(47) From onoraboutDecember14,2004,theexactdatebeingunknowntotheGrandJury,
and continuing thereaherup to and including no earliertban Novem ber 1,2006,in theDistrictof
Nevada and elsewhere,
W ILLIAM S.REED,
Section 1028A(a)(l).
CO UN T TH IR TY -TW O
Aggravated ldentity Theft
(l8U.S.C.j l028A)
(47) From onoraboutJanuary4,2005,theexactdatebeingunknowntotheGrand Jury,
and continuing thereaherup to and including no earlierthan Novem ber 1,2006,in the Districto
N evada and elsewhere,
W'
ILLIAM S.REED,
defendantherein,didknowinglypossessanduse,withoutlawftzlauthority,ameansofidentification
29
ofanotherperson,Timothy S.,dtlring and in relation to the comm ission ofW ireFraud,in violation
Section1028A(a)(l). yj
DATED:this
day ofJuly,20l1.
A TR UE BILL :
/s/
FO REPER SON O F TH E G RAN D JUR Y
D A N IEL G .BOG DEN
U nited StatesA ttorney
J.G REG OR D AM M
A ssistantU nited States Attorney
30