Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
This case arose from the purported sale of a parcel of land located in Dingle,
Iloilo by the late, Isabel Roces to a certain Gregorio Licauan, as evidenced by
a Deed of Sale, which was notarized by respondent Atty. Jose C. Aportadera.
On September 30 , 1986, a verified Complaint for Disbarment was flied with
this Court against respondent alleging, inter alia, that he caused the
execution of the Deed of Sale and made it appear that Isabel had participated
therein by forging her signature thereon, and notarizing it through the use of
a fictitious Residence Certificate. Complainant's averments were supported
the findings of the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI),in a report, dated
April 1, 1986, where it was found that: (1) respondent admitted he notarized
the deed although it was not signed by Isabel Roces in his presence, and
although he knew she was hospitalized at that time; (2) handwriting
examinations showed that the signature of Isabel Roces appearing in the
deed is a forgery; (3) when the deed was notarized in Iloilo on January 4,
1980, Isabel Roces was confined at. the Hospital de San Juan de Dios in Pasay
City, and could not have personally appeared before respondent in Iloilo City:
and (4) Residence Certificate No. A-9079133, listed in the subscription portion
of the Deed of Sale as that presented by Isabel Roces to respondent at that
time of notarization, was fictitious as it was issued on February 1, 1980, at
which time Isabel Roces had already passed away.
In Re: Basa
41 Phil 275
FACTS: Carlos Basa is a young lawyer convicted of the crime of abduction
with consent. He was sentenced to two years, eleven months, and eleven
days of imprisonment. The Solicitor General asked for Basas disbarment
based on his commission of a crime involving moral turpitude.
ISSUE: Whether or not the crime abduction with consent involves moral
turpitude.
HELD: Yes. Crimes of this character do involve moral turpitude. The inherent
nature of the act is such that it is against good morals and the accepted rule
of right conduct. Moral turpitude includes everything which is done contrary
to justice, honesty, modesty, or good morals. Basa was declared to be
suspended for one year immediately after he finished serving his sentence.
barrientos vs daarol
218 scra 30
29 January 1993
FACTS:
Complainant, Victoria Barrientos, is single, a college student, and was about
20 years and 7 months old during the time (July-October 1975) of her
relationship with respondent, while respondent Transfiguracion Daarol is
married, General Manager of Zamboanga del Norte Electric Cooperative, and
41 years old at the time of the said relationship.
Respondent is married to Romualda A. Sumaylo with whom be has a son; that
the marriage ceremony was solemnized on September 24, 1955 at Liloy,
Zamboanga del Norte by a Catholic priest, Rev. Fr. Anacleto Pellamo, and that
said respondent had been separated from his wife for about 16 years at the
time of his relationship with complainant.
Respondent had been known by the Barrientos family for quite sometime,
having been a former student of complainant's father in 1952 and, a former
classmate of complainant's mother at the Andres Bonifacio College in Dipolog
City; that he became acquainted with complainant's sister, Norma in 1963
and eventually with her other sisters, Baby and Delia and, her brother, Boy,
By his acts of deceit and immoral tendencies to appease his sexual desires,
respondent Daarol has amply demonstrated his moral delinquency. Hence, his
removal for conduct unbecoming a member of the Bar on the grounds of
deceit and grossly immoral conduct is in order. Good moral conduct is a
condition which precedes admission to the Bar and is not dispensed with
upon admission there. It is a continuing qualification to which all lawyers
must possess. Otherwise, a lawyer may be suspended or disbarred.