Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Four propositions
Institutional multiplicity: the interplay between formal and informal institutions and their
respective political agents in narratives of state fragility or resilience (Hesselbein, GoloobaMutebi, and Putzel, 2007). Individuals and organizations operate often simultaneously in
multiple institutional systems, governed by very different sets of incentives thus placing them
in complex, often unsolvable situations, but at the same time offering them the possibility of
shifting strategically from one institutional universe to another. (Putzel, 2006).
Institutional integrity: Institutions that are indigenously designed, adopted or adapted are
far more likely to be effective because they are more likely to enjoy both local legitimacy and
appropriateness. Governance and management (however distinctive and different their
purposes or designs), may be said to have integrity when the institutional arrangements
sustain the integrity of its personnel and its processes and crucially when the personnel
and processes sustain the institutions because they perceive it to be both legitimate and
effective.
Clan
( safety net)
Rebels
(protection/rido)
Islam
Among the four rule systems the (Symbols, family laws)
most embedded are clan rules
and dynamics. Clans influence is
manifest across other
institutions. Clans pay for the
costs of missionaries and the
construction and maintenance of
the madrasah, clan structures are
transported into the state, rebel
factions emerge from tribes and
clans, even humanitarian work
for ICGs are shaped by clan
dynamics.
State/OIC/ODA
Implications
Institutions do not necessarily complement each other, oftentimes they
rival, clash, or collide with each other.
Institutions do not reproduce themselves automatically. Political agency is
strategic to making them work across different situations.
Constant need to identify which institutions trump the rest.
Constant need to appeal to various institutions.
The World Bank used over 100 indicators to introduce a composite index of good
governance, based on perceptions of voice and accountability, political stability and the
absence of violence, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, the rule of law, and levels
of corruption.
The indicators failed to account for country-specific challenges and conditions, with crosscountry statistical analyses suffering from selection bias and ignoring the interlinkages among
a wide array of variables. Worse, good-governance reforms are now a condition for
international aid, forcing developing-country governments to mimic donor expectations,
instead of addressing the issues that are most pressing for their own citizens.
Moreover, the required reforms are so wide-ranging that they are beyond the means of most
developing countries to implement. As a result, good-governance solutions tend to distract
from more effective development efforts. And though so-called good governance standards
are formally neutral, they often favour particular vested interests, with grossly unfair
consequences. Reforms aimed at decentralization and devolution have, in some cases,
enabled the rise of powerful local political patrons.
Good Governance
agenda attempts
institutional changes
without attention to
the political
settlement
Political
Settlement
(configuration of power
on which states and
sub-states are built)
State Organisations
Executive
Authority
Legislative
Authority
State Institutions
Judicial
Authority
Property rights
& entitlements
Control over
assets
Organisational
structure of the
state
Access to
income
streams
Regulatory
Structure of the
economy
Rules
governing
transactions
Rules on Access
to state
organisations
Taxation
rules
Object of contention
& bargaining
Political
Settlement
(configuration of power
on which the state is
built)
State Organisations
Executive
Authority
Legislative
Authority
State Institutions
Judicial
Authority
Property rights
& entitlements
Control over
assets
Organisational
structure of the
state
Access to
income
streams
Regulatory
Structure of the
economy
Rules
governing
transactions
Rules on Access
to state
organisations
Taxation
rules
Clan dynamics
Clans determine inheritance rules. Clans collect zakat and possess the tarsila that
trace their royal lineage.
Clans observe rules in allocating the use of land. Numerous cases of rido have started
from institutional clashes in the case of communally owned land being subjected to
VOS/agrarian reform. Rare cases of fixed rent, usually a share in the harvest given as
tribute.
Clans provide protection to members, demand obedience to rules, impose penalties,
decide on rido (start and end).
Clans often demand that rebel members (MNLF or MILF) join them whenever a rido
erupts (either to fight or mediate). In exchange, clans provide additional warm bodies
and HPFs when rebellion-related conflict erupts.
Clans deliver the votes to candidates that are either clan members, or supported by
the clan.
Clans are distinguished by their level of engagement in the illegal economy, providing
capital, and mediating when conflicts arise. Few cases of inter/intra clan conflict over
the informal economy (bad for business), though politicians expect payments for
protection.
Clan networks extend beyond Muslim Mindanao. Rules and penalties are imposed as
far away as Manila, Cebu, etc.
Some conclusions ..
Shift in the power of Moro elites due to the post-Aquino constitution which made
national elites more beholden to them. Solid vote banking (2004, 2007) became
more important in determining electoral competition. (1M floor)
LGC and the IRA (government-to-government fund transfers) fed local warlords,
and institutionalized the soft-budget constraint.
Prior to 2004, warlords extended the reach of the State and were harnessed to
fight the separatists and communists. The outsourcing of violence leads to the
Maguindanao massacre. Guns are used against competing Moro elites. However,
impunity means violating other institutional identifications.
Local elites gain further legitimacy through their links to supranational criminal
networks and to ODA
Percent
employment
income
80
80
70
70
60
60
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
1988
1991
Philippines
1994
Luzon
1997
2000
Visayas
2003
2006
2009
Mindanao
1988
1991
Philippines
1994
1997
Luzon
2000
Visayas
2003
2006
2009
Mindanao
Luzon
Visayas
Mindanao
CARAGA
ARMM
SOCCSKSARGEN
Davao
N. Mindanao
Zam Pen
E. Visayas
C. Visayas
W. Visayas
Bicol
MIMAROPA
CALABARZON
C. Luzon
Cagayan V
Ilocos
CAR
NCR
Percent
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
The informal economy as an arena for legitimacy construction and the creation of
inclusive political settlements. The informal economy as the basis of elite bargains
and social contracts in places beyond the effective control of the State (Olsons
roving and stationary bandits)
A final note:
beware the rise in transition-induced violence
Violent conflict in Mindanao has many sources and triggers,
apart from vertical political violence.
Wars make states!
2012
80
2013
2014
60
40
.
20
0
Vertical conflict
Horizontal conflict
90
80
70
60
50
2011
40
2012
2013
30
20
10
0
Basilan
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi Tawi
Violence density refers to the number of violent incidents per 1,000 square
kilometers
[CATEGORY
NAME]
[PERCENTAGE]
Identity-based
13%
Political issues
23%
Resource-based
3%
Shadow
economies
33%
Extra-judicial
issues
20%
Number of
incidents
Conflict deaths
Resource-based
Governance issues
Identity-based
Extra-Judicial
issues
Political issues
Shadow
economies
-1200
-1000
-800
2011
-600
2012
-400
2013
2014
-200
0 0
200
400
600
2011
800
2012
1000
2013
1200
2014
1400
1600
60,000,000,000.00
1,000,000,000.00
50,000,000,000.00
800,000,000.00
40,000,000,000.00
600,000,000.00
30,000,000,000.00
400,000,000.00
20,000,000,000.00
200,000,000.00
10,000,000,000.00
Tax collections
Nominal GDP
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
26
Thank you