Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
timeline. Mr. Albert said that interim space is being identified with the help of the Department
of General Services (DGS). He explained that there are two interim service models being
explored. The first would keep all services in the same building and the second would spread
the services in different locations throughout the city. He specified 801 North Capitol Street,
and University of the District of Columbia as potential interim spaces and noted that Shaw
Junior High was ruled out.
Mr. McCarthy asked if the project timeline was on track. Mr. Albert responded that the project
is on track and DGS is helping to move the process along. Mr. Vincent Morris asked if there are
statistics available on Metro access to the MLK Library and said the interim should be Metro
accessible. Mr. Albert agreed that access to bus and rail is a high priority. Mr. Morris asked if
the collection would be accessible by the public. Mr. Reyes-Gavilan explained that DCPL hopes
to warehouse the majority of the MLK Library collection and circulate items via the holds
system. Additionally, this process should make the collection more discoverable because it will
be more relevant and up-to-date.
Mr. McCarthy asked if the Board should be concerned with any issues in the design process. Mr.
Albert responded that the Board would have an opportunity to review high-level designs and
give input. Mr. Reyes-Gavilan added that DCPL would rely on the architects to give
recommendations on the nuanced elements of the design.
Mr. Albert next stated that community engagement on the Cleveland Park Library renovation
has kicked off and interim space is being explored. As a result of the Mayors budget, Shepherd
Park Library will receive $1 million for a spruce up. Chevy Chase Library will get close to
$500,000 for a spruce up. The Capitol View Library renovation budget was reduced from $10.5
million to $4.5 million. The Palisades Library renovation budget was reduced from $15 million
to $8.2 million. Finally, he stated the HVAC has been working well across the system and
landscape maintenance has begun. Ms. Brenda Richardson thanked staff for ensuring the
flagpole at Capitol was fixed then inquired about the original building sign. Mr. Butler
responded that he would investigate the whereabouts of the sign.
Performance Oversight Committee Report
Mr. McCarthy introduced Ms. Valerie Mallett, Performance Oversight Committee Chair, to give
the Performance Oversight Committee Report. Ms. Mallett first discussed the performance
report noting that the statistics are normal. Despite a decrease in web visits, there was increase
in digital library circulation with many people accessing the collection through other sites such
as Facebook and Overdrive. Ms. Faith Gibson Hubbard asked if website visits can be counted by
the other sites. Mr. Reyes-Gavilan responded that the other sites do count website visits.
Next, Ms. Mallet introduced Ms. Judi Greenberg to give an update on strategic planning. She
said that a Strategic Planning Working Group was formed and meets bi-weekly. Staff focus
groups have begun and will continue through June. She noted that the Guiding Principles were
updated with the feedback received from the Board and are being used as an exercise in the
Document #5.1
Board of Library Trustees Meeting
July 22, 2015
3
focus groups. She added that the Staff Survey is the next step in the strategic planning process,
followed by topical focus groups involving community partners and stakeholders, and finally
community focus groups.
Ms. Brenda Richardson inquired about the impact of low participation from the community.
Ms. Greenberg replied that community meetings could always be added. Ms. Richardson also
asked if Board members will be invited to participate in the community meetings and if there
will be a meeting East of the River. Ms. Greenberg confirmed that Board members will be
invited and there would be one or more community meetings East of the River.
Mr. McCarthy requested that the Strategic Planning process be as timely as possible to allow a
draft Strategic Plan to help inform the FY17 budget process. Ms. Greenberg assured him that
the timeline is a generous estimation and the process is on track.
Library Fines Policy
Next, Mr. Reyes-Gavilan led a discussion on the Library Fines Policy intended to eliminate fines
and penalties for youth. He explained that removing fines would eliminate the need for parents
to sign library card applications. This would allow most students to be automatically registered
for a library card through their DC One Card. He also noted that most large urban public library
systems have eliminated fines for youth and teens.
Ms. Gibson Hubbard asked about standards for borrowing restrictions at libraries that have no
financial penalties. Mr. Reyes-Gavilan responded that Nashville and Columbus have barrier free
access with borrowing restricted to three items. He also explained that if the Board votes on
the policy, decisions regarding card restrictions and borrowing limitations could be made later.
Mr. McCarthy asked why the policy is applicable up to 20-years of age. Mr. Reyes Gavilan
replied that it would allow DCPL to serve as many students as possible. The policy would give
more students better access, which could result in increased circulation. Mr. McCarthy asked
how DCPL would conduct outreach to ensure students become library users. Mr. Reyes Gavilan
replied that the implementation of a DCPS/DCPL Shared Technical Services department would
ensure participation by granting students in public schools on the spot access to public library
books.
Mr. Morris asked if there is data on the anticipated loss of materials and associated funds if the
policy is implemented. Mr. Reyes-Gavilan noted that the information can be compiled and that
in FY14, the library collected $115,000 in fines for the DC General fund. Finally, Mr. ReyesGavilan explained that the policy would be available for public input for 30 days before it
officially goes into effect.
Mr. McCarthy motioned to adopt the policy. All Board members voted in favor. The policy was
adopted.
Document #5.1
Board of Library Trustees Meeting
July 22, 2015
4
Document #5.1
Board of Library Trustees Meeting
July 22, 2015
5