Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/14596463
CITATIONS
DOWNLOADS
VIEWS
959
509
238
2 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
Blake E Ashforth
Arizona State University
87 PUBLICATIONS 11,984 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Blake E. Ashforth
University of Manitoba
Concordia University
This meta-analysis examined how demand and resource correlates and behavioral and
attitudinal correlates were related to each of the 3 dimensions of job burnout. Both the
demand and resource correlates were more strongly related to emotional exhaustion than
to either depersonalization or personal accomplishment. Consistent with the conservation of resources theory of stress, emotional exhaustion was more strongly related to the
demand correlates than to the resource correlates, suggesting that workers might have
been sensitive to the possibility of resource loss. The 3 burnout dimensions were differentially related to turnover intentions, organizational commitment, and control coping.
Implications for research and the amelioration of burnout arc discussed.
lated to burnout. The theory suggests that burnout occurs when certain valued resources are lost, are inadequate to meet demands, or do not yield the anticipated
returns. The major demands of work include role ambiguity, role conflict, stressful events, heavy workload, and
pressure. The major resources include social support
from various sources; job enhancement opportunities,
such as control, participation in decision making, and autonomy; and reinforcement contingencies (Burke & Richardsen, 1993; Cordes& Dougherty, 1993). The theory
also states that certain behavioral and attitudinal outcomes arc likely to occur as a result of resource loss and
burnout. The major outcomes include behavioral coping
responses; turnover intentions; and erosion of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction (Burke & Richardsen, 1993; Kahili, 1988).
Using the conservation of resources framework, recent
studies have investigated how certain demand and resource predictors are associated with each of the burnout
dimensions (Lee & Ashforth, 1993a; Leiter, 1993;Leiter
& Maslach, 1988). Leiter and Maslach suggested that
work demands and resources are potential sources of
stress in the stress-strain-coping-self-evaluation process
(Cummings & Cooper, 1979; Lazarus & Folkman,
1984). Emotional exhaustion as a form of strain is directly affected by these correlates, whereas depersonalization as a form of defensive coping and personal accomplishment as a form of self-evaluation are indirectly
affected through emotional exhaustion.
Leiter and Maslach's (1988) model has received partial support. Lee and Ashforth (1993a, 1993b) found
several of the correlates to be associated with emotional
exhaustion and depersonalization, but the correlates
123
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
124
were only weakly associated with personal accomplishment. Moreover, Golembiewski's (1989) model and Lee
and Ashforth's (1993b) data have raised some doubts regarding the sequential ordering among the burnout dimensions as posited by Leiter and Maslach.
In light of these findings, Leiter {1993) proposed a revised model in which the demand and resource correlates
are posited to be differentially associated with the three
dimensions. Specifically, the demands are posited to be
more strongly related to emotional exhaustion, whereas
the resources are posited to be more strongly related to
either depersonalization or personal accomplishment. As
Hobfoll and Freedy (1993) stated, demands trigger strain
in the form of physical and emotional exhaustion,
whereas resources help to overcome the need for defensive coping and enhance one's self-efficacy. Leiter (1991 b,
1993) also posited that outcomes reflecting withdrawal
tendencies (e.g., escape coping, low job involvement, and
desire to quit) are more related to either emotional exhaustion or depersonalization, whereas outcomes reflecting positive self-efficacy (e.g., control coping and favorable work attitudes) are more related to personal
accomplishment.
Leiter's (1993) revised model also posits how the burnout dimensions themselves may be interrelated (cf. Golembiewski, 1989; Leiter, 1989). Specifically, it is now
believed that both emotional exhaustion and personal accomplishment develop in parallel with (rather than following from) each other. Hence, both of these dimensions
are posited to be "reactions to different aspects of the
work environment that pose difficulties for human service workers" (Leiter, 1993, p. 246).
Although the recent models are based in part on Hobfoil's (1989) conservation of resources theory, the empirical evidence has been piecemeal and limited in scope.
Thus, our meta-analysis assessed the associations between various correlates and each of the burnout dimensions. Only studies using the Maslach Burnout Inventory
(MBI; Maslach & Jackson, 1981, 1986) were included
because the scale is the most widely used operationalization of burnout. As a multidimensional measure, the
MBI makes it possible to determine whether the symptoms of burnout are empirically distinct from each other
and whether they are differentially associated with other
variables. Therefore, our study provides a summary of
the bivariate associations reported in the literature and
has implications for the diagnosis and the amelioration
of burnout.
lach Burnout Inventory," the computer search scanned the abstract databases of clinical psychology, education, management,
nursing, psychology, social work, and sociology from 1982 to
1994. The manual search scanned the reference lists of Burke
and Richardsen (1993), Cordes and Dougherty (1993), Kahili
(1988), and Shirom (1989) for published sources not found in
the aforementioned abstracts.
The search yielded 77 sources, of which 58 provided sufficient information to conduct the meta-analysis. Of the remaining 19 sources, 11 examined a correlate unique to that study,
and 8 did not provide information on reliability estimates, intercorrelations among the variables, or both. A letter requesting
the missing information was sent to one of the authors of each
of these 8 articles. This request yielded 3 additional sources, for
a total of 61.1 The remaining 5 and the 11 with unique correlates were excluded from the analysis.
The 61 studies used in the meta-analysis covered 33 correlates based on 56 independent samples. The sample sizes ranged
from 34 to 906 (M = 198.07, SD = 172.08). Approximately
80% of the studies sampled human service providers (e.g.,
teachers, nurses, counselors, police officers, and social workers),
whereas most of the remaining studies sampled supervisors and
managers of such service providers. Because the symptoms of
burnout appear to be fundamentally similar across hierarchical
levels (Lee & Ashforth, 1993a, 1993b; Maslach & Jackson,
1986), we did not differentiate the results on these bases.
Each study was coded on whether the MBI used the frequency
response format, the intensity response format, or both (see
Maslach & Jackson, 1981); the reliability estimates of all measures; and the correlations among the burnout dimensions and
correlates.
Mela-Analytic Procedure
We followed the procedure given by Hunter and Schmidt
(1990). This procedure determines the extent to which correlation differences across studies can be attributed to certain statistical artifacts. It is only after such artifacts are taken into account that the corrected correlations between variables, as well
as the variance in correlations across studies, can be estimated.
First, we calculated the uncorrected weighted mean correlation (/) by using the zero-order correlations. Second, because
reliability estimates might have varied widely across studies, we
corrected each within-study zero-order correlation for measurement unreliability (Hunter & Schmidt, 1990). Where reliability estimates were not reported, we substituted the weighted
mean reliability (see Table 1) into the correction formula.
Then, we calculated the individually corrected weighted mean
correlation (rc). Because so few studies reported scale ranges,
means, and standard deviations, it was not possible to correct
for range restrictions.
Third, we computed the variance of the individually corrected weighted mean correlation after removing the variances
Method
Literature Search
We undertook both computer and manual searches for published articles that used the MBI. Using the key phrase "Mas-
125
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Correlate
Job stressors
Role ambiguity
Role clarity
Role conflict
Role stress
Stressful events
Workload
Work pressure
Physical comfort
Support
Social support
Supervisor support
Coworker support
Work friends
Community bond
Family resources
Peer cohesion
Team cohesion
Job enhancement opportunities
Autonomy
Innovation
Participation
Skill utilization
Task orientation"
xx
6
6
10
3
1,518
929
2,612
703
903
1,238
681
433
.78
1,010
153
433
244
657
156
.69
.85
.86
.80
.80
.70
.74
.86
2,177
433
1,763
1.489
433
.79
.80
.83
.80
.75
5
5
4
6
12
13
2
4
2
5
2
11
4
6
6
4
3,377
3,340
.85
.79
.76
.87
.76
.79
.80
Correlate
Reinforcement contingencies
Unmet expectations
Contingent rewards
Noncontingent rewards
Contingent punishments
Noncontingent punishments
Frequency response format
Emotional exhaustion
Depersonalization
Personal accomplishment
Intensity response format
Emotional exhaustion
Depersonalization
Personal accomplishment
Behavioral and attitudinal outcomes
Control coping
Preventive coping
Turnover intentions
Organizational commitment
Job involvement
Job satisfaction
Attitudes toward workplace climate
Rxx
2
2
2
2
2
248
496
496
496
496
.59
.96
.69
.84
.80
47
47
47
9,668
9,668
9,668
.86
.76
9
9
9
1,637
1,637
1,637
.82
.78
.79
3
2
7
6
8
16
2
425
.83
.64
.78
.87
.72
.79
.80
470
1,231
1,866
1,077
3,788
227
.77
Note, k = number of samples providing reliability information; N = total number of individuals in the k samples; 7?Xx = weighted mean reliability
estimate of each variable across the k samples.
" Extent to which the work environment emphasizes efficiency and good planning.
Results
Table 1 reports the number of studies, the total sample
size, and the weighted mean reliability estimate for each
variable. Tables 2-5 report the uncorrected weighted
mean correlation, the individually corrected weighted
mean correlation, the variance, the lower and upper
range of the uncorrected weighted mean correlation
based on the 95% confidence interval, and the results of
the Q test for each correlate.
A credibility interval that includes zero indicates the probability of a disordinal moderator, where the relationship between two variables is positive in certain samples and negative
in others. However, a moderator is still possible even when the
interval does not include zero but is large enough to suggest that
the effect sizes are heterogeneous (Whitener, 1990).
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
126
Homogeneity of Effect
Sizes
Table 2
Mela-Correlations Among the Job Burnout Dimensions
95% CI
rc
VAR
Lower
Upper
% due to
artifacts
.029
.024
.053
.54
-.46
-.52
.75
-.21
-.26
88.76
55.69
88.00
36.40
10.44
49.01*
.050
.082
.085
.53
-.37
-.54
.77
-.08
-.15
86.67
86.69
87.48
69.53**
67.70**
71.92**
Q statistic
47
47
47
9,668
8,977
8,977
.52
-.27
-.29
.64
-.33
-.36
9
9
9
1,637
1,637
1.637
.53
-.18
-.27
.65
-.22
-.34
Note. The boldface r^s indicate that the 95% credibility interval did not include zero. In cases where the corrected variances were less than zero, the
Q statistic could not be calculated. When credibility intervals did not include zero and the Q statistic was not significant, the confidence interval (CI)
for homogeneous effect sizes was constructed. Otherwise, the CI for heterogeneous effect sizes was constructed, k = number of studies; N = combined
sample size; r = uncorrccted weighted mean correlation; rc = weighted mean correlation after correcting for within-study measurement unreliability;
VAR = variance of ^ after correcting for sampling error and measurement unreliability; % due to artifacts = percentage of variance due to artifacts
other than sampling error and measurement unreliability.
V :.()]. **/><.001.
127
Table 3
Meta-Correlations With Emotional Exhaustion (Frequency)
95% CI
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Correlate
Job stressors (demands)
Role ambiguity
Role clarity
Role conflict
Role stress
Stressful events
Workload
Work pressure
Physical comfort
Support (resources)
Social support
Supervisor support
Coworker support
Work friends
Community bond
Family resources
Peer cohesion
Team cohesion
Job enhancement opportunities (resources)
Innovation
Autonomy
Participation
Skill utilization
Task orientation'
Reinforcement contingencies (resources)
Unmet expectations
Contingent rewards
Noncontingent rewards
Contingent punishments
Noncontingent punishments
Behavioral and attitudinal outcomes
Control coping
Turnover intentions
Organizational commitment
Job involvement
Job satisfaction
Attitudes toward workplace climate
6
6
11
3
1,518
929
2,824
703
903
1,450
681
433
6
5
4
6
13
14
2
4
2
5
2
4
11
6
7
4
2
2
2
2
2
3
7
7
8
17
2
% due to
artifact
Q statistic
.54
-.19
.65
.72
.71
.75
.65
.05
97.51
64.01
89.01
41.18
92.36
69.70
48.62
244.74**
16.67*
129.78**
7.93
52.88**
34.94**
9.84
-.48
-.49
-.35
-.28
-.64
-.35
-.45
-.44
-.16
-.25
-.08
.39
-.31
.00
.26
-.01
65.94
82.64
79.88
71.10
19.72*
75.02**
69.58**
6.92*
12.77
94.48
42.51
2.34
90.77**
3.48
.008
.131
.002
.005
.002
-.48
-.35
-.12
.10
-.20
-.16
-.07
39.13
94.78
41.43
49.35
11.90
6.57
211.15**
10.31
14.33
4.55
.53
-.26
.15
.10
.32
.007
<0
<0
<0
<0
.36
-.38
.06
-.02
.23
.69
35.04
11.30**
-.30
.44
-.43
-.04
-.31
-.13
<0
.001
.002
.356
.264
<0
-.46
.31
-.54
-.21
-.44
-.26
62.25
39.75
96.65
98.02
20.14*
11.66
238.80**
879.82**
rc
VAR
Lower
Upper
-.09
.21
-.35
.53
.62
.52
.65
.50
-.11
.215
.012
.032
.002
.039
.009
.006
<0
-.11
-.51
.41
.41
.33
.55
.35
-.28
657
156
-.26
-.31
-.18
,05
-.38
-.16
-.08
-.20
-32
-.37
-.22
.05
-.48
-.17
-.10
-.22
.018
.018
.019
.044
<0
.002
.207
.011
433
2,177
1,763
1,701
433
-.24
-.13
-.26
-.20
-.20
-.30
-.15
.31
-.28
-.26
248
496
496
496
496
.38
-.24
.12
.09
.27
425
1,231
2,078
1,077
4,000
-.26
.37
-.38
-.03
-.26
-.11
1,010
3,589
3,552
153
433
244
227
.16
-.30
.42
.50
.45
.52
.41
.41
-.40
-.44
-.14
,24
.23
.40
-.14
.57
-.33
.13
-.19
.00
Note. The boldface rcs indicate that the 95% credibility interval did not include zero. In cases where the corrected variances were less than zero, the
Q statistic could not be calculated. When the credibility interval did not include zero and the Q statistic was not significant, the confidence interval
(CI) for homogeneous effect sizes was constructed. Otherwise, the CI for heterogeneous effect sizes was constructed, k = number of studies; N =
combined sample size; r = uncorrected weighted mean correlations; rc - weighted mean correlation after correcting for within-study measurement
unreliability; VAR - variance of rc after correcting for sampling error and measurement unreliability; % due to artifacts = percentage of variance
due to artifacts other than sampling error and measurement unreliability.
" Extent to which the work environment emphasizes efficiency and good planning.
128
Table 4
Meta-Correlations With Depersonalization
(Frequency)
95% Cl
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Correlate
Job stressors (demands)
Role ambiguity
Role clarity
Role conflict
Role stress
Stressful events
Workload
Work pressure
Physical comfort
Support (resources)
Social support
Supervisor support
Coworker support
Work friends
Community bond
Family resources
Peer cohesion
Team cohesion
Job enhancement opportunities (resources)
Innovation
Autonomy
Participation
Skill utilization
Task orientation"
Reinforcement contingencies (resources)
Unmet expectations
Contingent rewards
Noncontingent rewards
Contingent punishments
Noncontingent punishments
Behavioral and attitudinal outcomes
Control coping
Preventive coping
Turnover intentions
Organizational commitment
Job involvement
Job satisfaction
Attitudes toward workplace climate
A"
6
6
11
2
1,518
929
2,824
286
903
5
5
4
1,033
7
12
13
2
1,176
3,172
3,135
2
5
2
681
433
153
433
244
657
156
433
II
2,177
1,346
1,663
433
2
2
2
2
2
496
496
496
496
496
3
2
425
470
564
2.078
749
7
6
12
2
2,102
227
re
VAR
Lower
.25
.34
-.28
-.27
.030
.004
.056
- .41
.20
% due to
artifact
Q statistic
.49
.11
.52
.68
84.32
34.04
91.57
39.02"
9.23
130.82"
.70
91.62
83.95
58.45**
34.39**
Upper
.27
.41
.39
.24
.18
.04
.37
.54
.50
.34
.22
.06
<0
22
.30
.28
.17
.06
.002
-.14
.52
.39
.25
-.16
-.19
-.17
-.07
-.36
-.21
-.24
-.22
-.08
-.46
-.21
-.20
-.34
.070
.004
.015
.019
.016
.011
.189
.024
-.41
-.36
-.34
-.35
-.62
-.39
-.12
-.09
-.08
- .29
-.04
.35
.30
-.71
-.12
-.28
-.13
-.17
-.39
-.29
.007
.068
.010
-.46
-.31
-.29
-.50
-.47
-.10
-.15
-.14
-.28
-.22
-.10
-.14
-.29
- .23
<0
.051
.045
<0
.016
.00
.05
-.05
-.28
-.11
.13
.19
.007
.07
.31
-.10
-.11
-.19
-.02
.18
.08
.20
.25
.10
.25
<0
<0
<0
<0
.17
.37
.22
.34
<0
<0
<0
-.43
-.46
-.12
-.28
.18
.44
.008
.163
.136
-.53
-.29
-.57
-.28
-.32
-.24
-.25
-.28
-.37
.24
.31
-.33
-.09
-.33
-.12
-.42
-.11
-.44
-.15
<0
.13
-.03
.06
-.31
-.03
11.27
4.51
87.49
39.16
71.65
47.87
63.32
40.91
92.90
61.88
57.43**
20.52*
47.19**
3.84
10.91
3.38
70.45**
5.30
37.22
89.56
64.12
6.37
105.37**
14.16*
55.77
9.10
44.32
3.81
59.94
92.32
95.29
25.55**
78.34**
262.89**
Note. The boldface r^ indicate that the 95% credibility interval did not include zero. In cases where the corrected variances were less than zero, the
Q statistic could not be calculated. When the credibility interval did not include zero and the Q statistic was not significant, the confidence interval
(CI) for homogeneous effect sizes was constructed. Otherwise, the CI for heterogeneous effect sizes was constructed, k = number of studies; N combined sample size; r = uncorrected weighted mean correlation; rc = weighted mean correlation after correcting for within-study measurement
unreliability; VAR = variance of rc after correcting for sampling error and measurement unreliability; % due to artifacts = percentage of variance
due to artifacts other than sampling error and measurement unreliability.
* Extent to which the work environment emphasizes efficiency and good planning.
129
Table 5
Meta-Correlations With Personal Accomplishment (Frequency)
95% CI
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Correlate
Job stressors (demands)
Role ambiguity
Role clarity
Role conflict
Role stress
Stressful events
Workload
Work pressure
Physical comfort
Support (resources)
Social support
Supervisor support
Coworker support
Work friends
Community bond
Family resources
Peer cohesion
Team cohesion
Job enhancement opportunities (resources)
Innovation
Autonomy
Participation
Skill utilization
Task orientation8
Reinforcement contingencies (resources)
Unmet expectations
Contingent rewards
Noncontingent rewards
Contingent punishments
Noncontingent punishments
Behavioral and attitudinal outcomes
Control coping
Turnover intentions
Organizational commitment
Job involvement
Job satisfaction
Attitudes toward workplace climate
% due to
artifact
Q statistic
.51
.20
-.02
.21
.57
.09
.09
.11
97.71
87.26
93.94
84.27
96.56
89.79
40.37
26 1 .52**
47.10**
165.13**
19.07**
116.88**
68.60**
8.39
-.04
-.03
-.04
.36
-.44
-.27
-.47
-.56
.44
.30
.30
.62
-.07
.02
.03
.79
92.01
93.01
93.11
90.11**
187.79**
219.22**
46.16
7.43
86.53
94.41
37.15**
35.92**
.094
.103
.017
.178
.003
-.56
-.13
.16
-.04
-.51
.03
.28
.43
.52
-.16
88.40
92.91
78.95
97.02
19.96
34.18**
155.18"
29.42**
202.69**
5.04
.19
.14
-.17
.02
-.16
.002
<0
<0
<0
<0
-.31
.02
-.29
-.09
-.25
-.07
.27
-.04
.15
.07
24.56
2.90
.52
-.16
-.02
-.11
.29
.28
<0
<0
.132
.182
.394
<0
.42
-.05
-.27
-.29
-.16
.16
.62
-.27
.22
.21
.42
.40
96.26
92.19
98.28
187.24**
76.96**
641.61**
rc
VAR
Lower
Upper
6
6
10
3
4
7
5
4
1,131
929
2,271
703
903
1,616
681
433
.09
-.03
-.15
.00
.18
-.07
-.07
-.06
.11
-.03
-.21
.00
.22
-.09
-.09
-.07
.374
.066
.105
.040
.160
.068
.007
<0
-.29
-.26
-.41
-.21
-.13
-.29
-.27
-.26
5
2
1,176
3,589
3,614
153
433
244
657
156
.16
.11
.10
.37
-.21
-.09
-.17
.09
.20
.14
.13
.49
-.26
-.12
-.22
.12
.114
.073
.083
<0
.010
<0
.078
.345
4
11
6
6
4
433
2,177
1,763
1,663
433
-.21
.06
.23
.13
-.26
-.26
.07
.30
.24
-.33
496
496
496
496
496
-.13
.13
-.13
.02
-.13
425
286
2,078
749
2,241
227
.42
-.13
-.02
-.10
.22
.23
13
15
2
4
2
2
y
2
2
3
2
7
6
1]
2
Note. The boldface rcs indicate that the 95% credibility interval did not include zero. In cases where the corrected variances were less than zero, the
Q statistic could not be calculated. When the credibility interval did not include zero and the Q statistic was not significant, the confidence interval
(CI) for homogeneous effect sizes was constructed. Otherwise, the CI for heterogeneous effect sizes was constructed, k = number of studies; A' =
combined sample size; r = uncorrectcd weighted mean correlation; rc = weighted mean correlation after correcting for within-study measurement
unreliability; VAR = variance of rc after correcting for sampling error and measurement unreliability; % due to artifacts = percentage of variance
due to artifacts other than sampling error and measurement unreliability.
' Extent to which the work environment emphasizes efficiency and good planning.
"ps.OOI.
Expectations can be perceived as either resources or demands, depending on the degree to which they are met. Unmet
expectations would likely be viewed as demands because they
threaten one's work adjustment, whereas met expectations
would likely be viewed as resources because they confirm or
support one's adjustment.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
130
may be offset by outcomes that stem from personal accomplishment and reflect the desire to seek control.
Whichever response (either withdrawing or seeking
control) predominates may thus depend on the relative
strengths of emotional exhaustion and personal accomplishment as each develops independently over time (Lee
& Ashforth, 1993a; Leiter, 1993).
Study Limitations
One limitation is that the meta-correlations show only
the strength of the relations among the burnout dimensions and by no means deal with the controversy regarding their sequential ordering (Golembiewski, 1989;
Leiter, 1989). The arguments over the correct sequence
are based on circumstantial evidence of how strongly
each dimension is related to certain antecedent and outcome variables (Cordes & Dougherty, 1993; e.g., see Lee
& Ashforth, 1993b).
A second limitation is that the strong association found
between emotional exhaustion and five of the demand
stressors may be partly attributed to a measurement artifact. Three of Maslach and Jackson's (1981, 1986) emotional exhaustion scale items (i.e., "I feel emotionally
drained from my work," "Working with people directly
puts too much stress on me," and "Working with people
all day is really a strain for me") are direct measures of
individual stress reactions. These items correspond
closely to items that tap perceived stress found in frequently used scales of role overload, role conflict, role
ambiguity, stressful events, and work pressure.
A third limitation is that only certain demands and resources were examined here. The fact that emotional exhaustion was strongly associated with several of the correlates does not necessarily imply the absence of other
correlates that may be more strongly associated with the
other two dimensions.
Two sets of correlates not examined here are demographic (e.g., sex, age, and education) and dispositional
attributes (e.g., Type A personality, psychological hardiness, and locus of control). Although these attributes
have been linked to burnout (Cordes & Dougherty, 1993;
Mclntyre, 1984;Nowack, 1986), their potential as moderators requires further clarification and investigation.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
131
188.
*Gaines, J., & Jermier, J. M. (1983). Emotional exhaustion in
a high stress organization. Academy oj Management Journal,
26, 567-586.
Golembiewski, R. T. (1989). A note on Leiter's study: Highlighting two models of burnout. Group and Organization
Studies, 14, 5-13.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new at-
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
132
"Leiter, M. P. (1988a). Burnout as a function of communication patterns. Group and Organization Studies, 13, 111 -128.
"Leiter, M. P. {1988b). Commitment as a function of stress reactions among nurses: A model of psychological evaluations
of work settings. Canadian Journal of Community Menial
Health, 7, 115-132.
Leiter, M. P. (1989). Conceptual implications of two models of
burnout: A response to Golembiewski. Group and Organization Studies, 14, 15-22.
"Leiter, M. P. (1990). The impact of family resources, control
coping, and skill utilization on the development of burnout:
A longitudinal study. Human Relations, 11, 1067-1083.
"Leiter, M. P. (1991a). Burnout as a crisis in professional role
structures: Measurement and conceptual issues. Anxiety,
Stress, and Coping, 5, 79-93.
"Leiter, M. P. (199 I b ) . Coping patterns as predictors of burnout: The function of control and escapist coping patterns.
Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 12, 123-144.
Leiter, M. P. (1993). Burnout as a developmental process: Consideration of models. In W. B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach, & T.
Marek (Eds.), Professional burnout: Recent developments in
theory and research (pp. 237-250). Washington, DC: Taylor
& Francis.
"Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (1988). The impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9, 297-308.
"Lewis, S. L., Becktell, P. J., Bonner, P. N., Campbell, M. A.,
Cooper, C. L., & Hunt, W. C. (1992). Work stress, burnout,
and sense of coherence among dialysis nurses. American Nephrology Nurse's Association Journal, 19, 545-553.
Maslach, C. (1982). Burnout: The cost of caring. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
"Maslach, C., & Florian, V. (1988). Burnout, job setting, and
self-evaluation among rehabilitation counsellors. Rehabilitation Psychology, 33, 85-93.
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2, 99113.
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1986). Maslach Burnout Inventory manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Mclntyre, T. C. (1984). The relationship between locus of control and teacher burnout. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 235-238.
"McMullen, M. B., & Krantz, M. (1988). Burnout in day care
workers: The effects of learned helplessness and self-esteem.
Child & Youth Care Quarterly, 17, 275-280.
"Miller, K. I., Ellis, B. H., Zook, E. G., & Lyles, J. S. (1990).
An integrated model of communication, stress, and burnout
in the workplace. Communication Research, 17, 300-326.
"Miller, K. L, Stiff, J. B., & Ellis, B. H. (1988). Communication
and empathy as precursors to burnout among human service
workers. Communication Monographs, 55, 250-265.
Mitchell, T. R., & James, L. R. (1989). Theory development
forum: Situational versus dispositional factors: Competing
explanations of behavior; Conclusions and future directions.
Academy of Management Review, 14, 331-332,401-407.
"Nagy, S. (1985). Burnout and selected variables as compo-
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
133