Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.elsevier.com/locate/yexer
Review
Abstract
Purpose. To historically review the technique of impression cytology as a minimally invasive diagnostic tool for ocular surface pathology.
Methods. A comprehensive review of published literature cited in PubMed since the first description of impression cytology in 1977 up to
date has been undertaken.
Results. A wide range of processing methods have been adapted to the technique of impression cytology (from conjunctiva, cornea or
limbus): regular light microscopy with different stainings, transmission and scanning electron microscopy, immunofluorescence,
immunocytochemistry, polymerase chain reaction analysis, immunoblotting analyses, or flow cytometry. At present, it is widely used as a
non-invasive alternative to the full-thickness biopsy for the obtention of epithelial cells from the ocular surface.
Conclusions. Impression cytology represents a non- or minimally invasive biopsy of the ocular surface epithelium with no side effects or
contraindications. It has demonstrated to be a useful diagnostic aid for a wide variety of processes involving the ocular surface. In addition,
and mainly during the last decade, its use as a research tool has experienced an enormous growth and has greatly contributed to the
understanding of ocular surface pathology.
q 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: blepharitis; conjunctiva; cornea; dry eye; epithelium; goblet cells; impression cytology; keratoconjunctivitis sicca; mucins; ocular surface; tear film
1. Introduction
Impression cytology (IC) is the technique of collection of
the most superficial layers of the ocular surface by applying
different collecting devices (usually filter papers) so that
cells adherent to that surface are subsequently removed
from the tissue and further processed for a diversity of
techniques. It represents therefore a non- or minimally
invasive biopsy of, usually, the conjunctiva, although it can
be applied to the cornea and the limbal area.
IC was first introduced in 1977 simultaneously by
investigators from Moorfields Eye Hospital in London
(UK) (Thatcher et al., 1977) and from David Maurices
group at the Stanford University School of Medicine in
California (USA) (Egbert et al., 1977).
Thatcher et al. designed this technique with a plastic
impression disc in order to study the cytologic response of
* Corresponding author. Dr Margarita Calonge, Instituto Universitario de
Oftalmobiologa Aplicada (IOBA), University of Valladolid, Ramon y
Cajal, 7, E-47005 Valladolid, Spain.
E-mail address: calonge@ioba.med.uva.es (M. Calonge).
0014-4835/$ - see front matter q 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI:10.1016/j.exer.2003.09.009
458
2. Literature search
A medline (PubMedNCBI http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/)
search has been conducted matching the term impression
cytology with either eye or ocular. Additional more
limited searches were also conducted to seek several aspects
(i.e. electron microscopy and IC), which brought additional
reports. First references were found in 1977 (Thatcher et al.,
1977; Egbert et al., 1977), with a slight increase until the
end of the 1980s, from where the numbers of papers using
IC has constantly increased up to present level. The
approximate number of total publications found were over
450. All publications in English and Spanish were consulted
in their entire length as well as the English abstracts
available for those in other languages.
3. Literature review
Since the publication of the first reports on IC in 1977
(Egbert et al., 1977; Thatcher et al., 1977), many
modifications have been introduced, regarding aspects like
IC sampling, processing methods or the different applications. All these aspects are summarized below.
3.1. Techniques of cell collection
3.1.1. Materials used for cell collection
Regarding the materials used to collect cells from the
ocular surface, paper filters of different kind have been most
often used, with a few exceptions. One of these exceptions is
the first description of the technique by Thatcher et al. using
a plastic (polystyrene) applanation cytometer that was
pressed onto the conjunctiva and then snapped off and
processed (Thatcher et al., 1977). Some other authors have
used plastic materials such as plastic discs (Thermanox)
(Hershenfeld et al., 1981) or glass slides (Zaidman and
Billingsley, 1998).
Egbert et al. first reported good results using filters
composed of mixed esters of cellulose with submicroscopic
pores (MF-Millipore, type VS), after experiencing bad
results with cellophane tape, photographic film, and various
synthetic filters (Duralon, Polyvic, Mitex) (Egbert et al.,
1977). Later, and since the report by Nelson et al. using the
same cellulose acetate filters with a pore size of 0025 mm
(Nelson et al., 1983), most authors agree to use paper filters
with pore sizes ranging between 0025 and 045 mm. Pore
size is not irrelevant, as it affects the consistency of cell
collection (the larger the pore size, the better the collection)
and the resolution of the details under the microscope (small
pore size preserves details better) (Vadrevu and Fullard,
1994), and it has actually been defined that a medium pore
size of 022 mm renders the best results (Martinez et al.,
1995).
In addition to cellulose acetate filters, other materials
have been used, such as nitrocellulose, Biopore membranes
or polyether sulfone filters. Biopore membranes (MillicellCM 04 mm, Millipore) have been preferentially used for
immunohistochemistry, either unmounted (Pflugfelder et al.,
1990) or mounted (Thiel et al., 1997). These membranes
have also been used for ELISA (Garcher et al., 1998) and for
the study of neoplasms of the ocular surface (Tole et al.,
2001).
Filters are usually cut in different shapes and sizes for
orientation purposes during processing and then applied to
the conjunctiva with forceps. They are pressed onto the
ocular surface, usually for 3 5 sec, originally with the aid
of a solid rod for 3 5 sec (Egbert et al., 1977; Adams et al.,
1988; Saini et al., 1990), and later with similar devices
(Nelson et al., 1983; Donisi et al., 2003). Alternatively, the
lateral aspect or the blunt end of forceps used to manipulate
filters can be used (Tseng, 1985). Nelson, in an attempt to
standardize the technique, introduced the use of an
ophthalmodynamometer so that the same amount of
pressure (40 g) was always applied to the filter (Nelson,
1988; Krenzer and Freddo, 1997). It was later demonstrated
that a pressure of 60 g gave better results than either 80 or
40 g (Martinez et al., 1995).
No anesthesia was first used in the method (plastic disk)
described by Thatcher et al. (Thatcher et al., 1977). Egbert
et al. described a frequent pricking sensation when epithelial
cells were pulled off with an absorbent filter and no
anesthesia (Egbert et al., 1977). At present, topical
anesthesia is consistently used, mainly if more adherent
filter papers are applied because the removal of cells can
cause discomfort without anesthesia but is absolutely
painless when a drop of topical anesthesia is instilled.
Although some authors initially suggested that topical
anesthetics might cause artifacts (Thatcher et al., 1977), it
was alternatively suggested from the beginning (Egbert
et al., 1977) that some anesthetics (05% proparacaine)
would not alter the morphologic appearance of cells (Nelson
et al., 1983). However, the influence of topical anesthesia on
the results of IC has not been evaluated.
IC has also been taken from buccal mucosa in cases of
Sjogrens syndrome and compared with labial salivary gland
biopsies, with a rate of agreement of 97%; pathological
changes were found in 94% of the conjunctival IC specimens
and 76% of buccal specimens (Aguilar et al., 1991).
Finally, Adams first described a similar method to that of
the IC to study the morphologic features of human
conjunctival mucus (Adams, 1979). In normal conditions,
more than 100 granules per mm2, sheets, and strands are
visible (Tseng et al., 1987; Herreras et al., 1992).
459
460
intensity of goblet cells present; (3) the presence nonepithelial cells, i.e. inflammatory cells, microorganisms, etc.
It is important to understand that IC removes 1 3
layers (although sometimes even the basal layer) and it is
not therefore comparable to flat mounts or sections of the
ocular surface. For this reason, goblet cell densities
found with IC cannot be compared with goblet cell
densities harvested with biopsies. However, comparisons
can be made among IC specimens provided the way of
obtaining samples have been similar (Nelson, 1988).
Several grading systems have been published. Although
recognizing the usefulness of most of them, only the most
general ones are outlined below. Table 1 also summarizes
the most important characteristics of these grading systems.
461
Table 1
Main grading systems for conjunctival impression cytology specimens processed for light microscopy
Goblet cells
Tseng,
1985
Nelson,
1988
Size/form
Density
PAS
staining
Size/form
Cyto staining
NS
Moderate
NS
Uniform
Blue to green
1:1
NS
Decreased
NS
Mild enlargement
Blue to green
1:21:3
NS
Absent
NS
Absent
NS
Blue-green to
mild pinkish
Pinkish
1:4
NS
Moderate enlargement
flattened (squamoid)
Markedly squamoid
1:6
NS
Absent
NS
Markedly squamoid
large
Pinkish
1:8
NS
Absent
NS
Shrunken cytoplasm
NS
Abundant
Intense
Small, round
Decreased
intense
Markedly
decreased
Less
intense
Slightly larger
more polygonal
Larger polygonal
Grade 3
Grade 0
Plump,
oval
Plump,
oval
Smaller,
poorly
defined
border
NS
NS
Very few
Abundant
NS
Intense
Grade 1
NS
Grade 2
Grade 3
NS
NS
Slightly
decreased
Decreased
Very
decreased
Stage 0: normal
conj epithelium
Stage 1: early
GC loss, no K
Stage 2: total
GC loss, no K
Stage 3: early
and mild K
Stage 4:
moderate K
Stage 5:
advanced K
Grade 0
Grade 1
Grade 2
Adams
et al., 1988
N/C ratio
Other
Eosinophilic
May
be absent
Large
1:2
Visible KF mild
pyknotic N
Densely packed KF,
pyknotic N
Keratohyaline gr
Densely packed IF,
pyknotic N
Basophilic N
Eosinophilic
Smaller
1:3
NS
Variable
Small
1:41:5
Occasionally MN
Large polygonal
Normal
Basophilic
NS
Small
Normal
.1:6
1:2
Pyknotic
Good cell sheet
Intense
Larger
NS
NS
1:3
Reduced
Pale
Larger
Large, irregular
NS
NS
NS
Small
NS
NS
NS
Conj, conjunctiva; Cyto, cytoplasm; GC, goblet cells; gr, granules; K, keratinization; KF, keratin filaments; MN, multinucleated; N, nucleus; NS, not
specified; PAS, periodic acid Schiffs staining.
462
463
464
465
466
signs and reduced the frequency of artificial tear administration, but did not reduce the rose Bengal staining or IC
results (Shaker et al., 1989). Later, unpreserved carboxymethylcellulose artificial tears (Grene, 1992) and hyaluronate-containing artificial tears (Aragona et al., 2002),
however, produced improvement in the IC grades of KCS
patients. Oral antioxidant therapy for marginal dry eye also
showed improvement in IC samples (Blades et al., 2001).
The same discrepancy is found in the evaluation of the
response to punctal plug occlusion. For instance, IC
abnormalities were shown to persist for 6 weeks after
punctal plug, even though patients had improved clinically
(Willis et al., 1987). Recently, however, improvement in IC
findings has been reported 6 weeks and one year after
punctal occlusion in dry eye patients (Dursun, et al., 2003),
6 months after silicone canalicular plugs were inserted in
trachomatous dry eye (Guzey et al., 2001) or after being
inserted for superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis (Yang et al.,
1997). In this same disease, thermocauterization of the
superior bulbar conjunctiva demonstrated to restore the loss
of goblet cells harvested by IC (Udell et al., 1986).
The number of PAS positive cells (mainly goblet cells) in
IC specimens can be used to judge the efficacy of treatments
that intend to increase its numbers, such as gefarnate
(Toshida et al., 2002) or P2Y2 agonists (Fujihara et al.,
2002). Care needs to be taken though, as sometimes many
PAS positive cells (supposedly those non-goblet epithelial
cells belonging to the secondary secretory system) can be
seen in IC specimens and sometimes a sheet of PAS positive
material can be observed.
Other therapeutic options have used IC findings to
demonstrate their benefits. For instance, treatment with
botulin toxin A-induced protective ptosis in cases of
indolent corneal disease showed recovery of the normal
conjunctival morphology (Kirkness et al., 1988). This
therapy, however, was not effective in improving cytological changes in IC samples of dry eye patients who also
suffered from blepharospasm (Horwath-Winter et al., 2003).
IC has also been used to demonstrate the adverse effects
of long-term use of topical medications on the conjunctiva.
Antiglaucoma medications have been shown to induce
conjunctival metaplasia associated with the number of
medications used (Brandt et al., 1991). Another prospective
study showed no significant epithelial cell damage but
significant and progressive goblet cell decrease in patients
after 1 3 months of topical treatment with one preserved
antiglaucoma medication compared to baseline conditions
(same patients before initiating treatment) (Herreras et al.,
1992). These effects can be attributable to the medications
themselves, the preservatives and/or the duration of topical
treatment. Later, Baudouin et al. showed abnormal
expression of inflammatory markers (by immunofluorescence on IC samples) in conjunctival cells in the absence of
clinical inflammation in patients receiving preserved
(especially with benzalkonium chloride) antiglaucoma
drops chronically, which correlated with failure in filtering
467
468
metaplasia, intraepithelial lymphocyte infiltration) in radiology technicians exposed to diagnostic doses of radiation,
suggesting that routine examination by IC can be beneficial
in detecting early cytological radiation-induced and dry eye
changes in these workers (Gurdal et al., 2002). Striking
epithelial changes have been described (including abnormal
mitoses, nuclear fragmentation and atypia, snake-like
chromatin) in 10 patients after they were irradiated for
paranasal sinus tumors and dose related (changes were not
evident until 25 Gy were reached, and they were more
severe with 30 35 Gy) (Midena et al., 1991).
IC has also been used as an impression debridement
technique, effectively removing degenerated cells, inflammatory cells and organisms from corneal ulcers, as well as
filaments of filamentary Keratitis (Arora and Singhvi, 1994).
Similarly, IC on the cornea of rabbits has been used to
remove some epithelial layers and subsequently create an
epithelial defect that facilitated the adhesion of pseudomona
aeruginosa (Klotz et al., 1989).
4. Summary
In summary IC is an extraordinarily useful technique. It
has become a routine technique to evaluate squamous
metaplasia and goblet cell changes in any ocular surface
disease, specially in those dry eye-related disorders, being
useful for diagnostic purposes and to follow the course of
therapeutic interventions. In addition, and especially during
the last decade, it has become the technique of choice to
obtain samples from the ocular surface epithelium, which
has greatly contributed to increase our knowledge on its
biology and its contribution to ocular surface pathology.
References
Adams, A.D., 1979. The morphology of human conjunctival mucus. Arch.
Ophthalmol. 97, 730734.
Adams, A.D., Dilly, P.N., Kirkness, C.M., 1988. Monitoring ocular disease
by impression cytology. Eye 2, 506516.
Adar, S., Kanpolat, A., Surucu, S., Ucakhan, O.O., 1997. Conjunctival
impression cytology in patients wearing contact lenses. Cornea 16,
289 294.
Aguilar, A.J., Fonseca, L.F., Croxatto, J.O., 1991. Sjogrens syndrome: a
comparative study of impression cytology of the conjunctiva and buccal
mucosa, and salivary gland biopsy. Cornea 10, 203206.
Albietz, J.M., 2001. Conjunctival histologic findings of dry eye and non-dry
eye contact lens wearing subjects. CLAO J. 27, 3540.
Albietz, J.M., Bruce, A.S., 2001. The conjunctival epithelium in dry eye
subtypes: effect of preserved and non-preserved topical treatments.
Curr. Eye Res. 22, 818.
Aragona, P., Romeo, G.F., Puzzolo, D., Micali, A., Ferreri, G., 1996.
Impression cytology of the conjunctival epithelium in patients with
vernal conjunctivitis. Eye 10, 8285.
Aragona, P., Papa, V., Micali, A., Santocono, M., Milazzo, G., 2002. Long
term treatment with sodium hyaluronate-containing artificial tears
reduces ocular surface damage in patients with dry eye. Br.
J. Ophthalmol. 86, 181184.
469
expression in tear deficient dry eye syndrome. IOVS 2003;44:ARVO EAbstract 2508.
Chan, C.M.L., Liu, Y.P., Tan, D.T.H., 2002. Ocular surface changes in
pterygium. Cornea 21, 3842.
Chen, J.J.Y., Tseng, S.C.G., 1991. Abnormal corneal epithelial wound
healing in partial-thickness removal of limbal epithelium. Invest.
Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 32, 22192233.
Chowdhury, S., Kumar, R., Ganguly, N.K., Kumar, L., Nain, C.K., Walia,
B.N., 1996. Conjunctival impression cytology with transfer (CICT) to
detect pre-clinical vitamin A deficiency among slum children in India.
Br. J. Nutr. 75, 785 790.
Connor, C.G., Campbell, J.B., Steel, S.A., Burke, J.H., 1994. The effects of
daily wear contact lenses on goblet cell density. J. Am. Optom. Assoc.
65, 792794.
Connor, C.G., Campbell, J.B., Steel, S.A., 1997. The effects of disposable
daily wear contact lenses on goblet cell count. CLAO J. 23, 3739.
Connor, C.G., Flockencier, L.L., Hall, C.W., 1999. The influence of gender
on the ocular surface. J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 70, 182 186.
Corrales, R.M., Galarreta, D.J., Herreras, J.M., Calonge, M., Chaves, F.J.,
2003a. Normal human conjunctival epithelium expresses MUC13,
MUC15, MUC16 and MUC17 mucin genes. Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftalmol.
78, 375382.
Corrales, R.M., Calonge, M., Herreras, J.M., Saez, V., Chaves, F.J., 2003b.
Human epithelium from conjunctival impression cytology expresses
MUC7 mucin gene. Cornea 22, 665 671.
Corrales, R.M., Calonge, M., Herreras, J.M., Saez, V., Mayo, A., Chaves,
F.J., 2003c. Levels of mucin gene expression in normal human
conjunctival epithelium in vivo. Curr. Eye Res. 27, 323328.
Corrales, R.M., Galarreta, D.J., Herreras, J.M., Gonzalez, M.J., Arranz,
I., Saez, V., Mayo, A., Garca-Vazquez, C., Calonge, M., Chaves,
F.J., 2003d. Prospective variation in the expression of the
conjunctival mucin genes MUC5ac, MUC7, MUC16, and MUC17
before, during, and after contact lens wear. IOVS 44:ARVO EAbstract 3777.
Cvenkel, B., Ohan, A., 2002. Ocular surface changes induced by topoical
antiglaucoma monotherapy. Ophthalmologica 216, 175 179.
Danjo, Y., Watanabe, H., Tisdale, A.S., George, M., Tsumura, T., Abelson,
M.B., Gipson, I.K., 1998. Alteation of mucin in human conjunctival
epithelia in dry eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 39, 26022609.
Dart, J., 1997. Impression cytology of the ocular surface-research tool or
routine clinical investigation? Br. J. Ophthalmol. 81, 930.
Dogru, M., Katakami, C., Nakagawa, N., Tetsumoto, K., Yamamoto, M.,
1998. Impression cytology in atopic dermatitis. Ophthalmology 105,
14781484.
Dogru, M., Katakami, C., Inoue, M., 2001. Tear function and ocular surface
changes in noninsulindependent diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmology 108,
586 592.
Dogru, M., Karakaya, H., Ozcetin, H., Ertuk, H., Yucel, A., Pzmen, A.,
Baykara, M., Tsubota, K., 2003. Tear function and ocular surface
changes in keratoconus. Ophthalmology 110, 11101118.
Donisi, P.M., Rama, P., Fasolo, A., Ponzin, D., 2003. Analysis of limbal
stem cell deficiency by corneal impression cytology. Cornea 22,
533 538.
Doughty, M.J., Blandes, K., Button, N.F., Wilson, G., 2000. Further
analysis of the size and shape of cells obtained by impression cytology
from the exposed portion of the human bulbar conjunctiva. Ophthalmic
Physiol. Opt. 20, 391400.
Dursun, D., Demirham, B., Oto, S., Aydin, P., 2000. Impression cytology of
the conjunctival epithelium in patients with chronic renal failure. Br.
J. Ophthalmol. 84, 12251227.
Dursun, D., Ertan, A., Bilezikci, B., Akova, Y.A., Pelit, A., 2003. Ocular
surface changes in keratoconjunctivitis sicca with silicone punctum
plug occlusion. Curr. Eye Res. 26, 263 269.
Egbert, P.R., Lauber, S., Maurice, D.M., 1977. A simple conjunctiva
biopsy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 84, 798 801.
Fenga, C., Aragona, P., Cacciola, A., Ferreri, F., Spatari, G., Stilo, A.,
Spinella, R., Germano`, D., 2001. Ocular discomfort and conjunctival
470
Ihan, A., Cvenkel, B., 2000. Conjunctival epithelium expression of HLADR in glaucoma patients and its influence on the outcome of filtration
surgery. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 84, 648 650.
Inatomi, T., Spurr-Michaud, S., Tisdale, A.S., Gipson, I.K., 1995. Human
corneal and conjunctival epithelia express MUC1 mucin. Invest.
Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36, 18181827.
Jones, D.T., Monroy, D., Ji, Z., Atherton, S.S., Pflugfelder, S.C., 1994.
Sjogrens syndrome: cytokine and EpsteinBarr viral gene expression
within the conjunctival epithelium. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 35,
34933504.
Karabulut, A.A., Yalvac, I.S., Vahaboglu, H., Nurozler, A.B., Duman, S.,
1999. Conjunctival impression cytology and tear-film changes in
patients with psoriasis. Cornea 18, 544548.
Kenyon, K.R., Tseng, S.C.G., 1989. Limbal autograft transplantation for
ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 96, 709 723.
Kim, J.W., 1997. Conjunctival impression cytology of the filtering bleb.
Korean J. Ophthalmol. 11, 25 31.
Kirkness, C.M., Adams, A.D., Dilly, P.N., Lee, J.P., 1988. Botulinum toxin
A-induced protective ptosis in corneal disease. Ophthalmology 95,
473 480.
Klotz, S.A., Au, Y., Misra, R.P., 1989. A partial-thickness epithelial defect
increases the adherence of pseudomonas aeruginosa to the cornea.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 30, 10691074.
Knop, E., Brewitt, H., 1992. Conjunctival cytology in asymptomatic
wearers of soft contact lenses. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.
230, 340347.
Knop, E., Reale, E., 1994. Fine structure and significance of snakelike
chromatin in conjunctival epithelial cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
35, 711719.
Krenzer, K.L., Freddo, T.F., 1997. Cytokeratin expression in normal human
bulbar conjunctiva obtained by impression cytology. Invest. Ophthalmol. 38, 142152.
Kruse, F.E., Schmitz, W., Jaeger, W., Gotz, M.L., 1986a. Scanning electron
microscopy image of cells of the conjunctival epithelium in specimens
from impression cytology. Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilkd. 188, 2932.
Kruse, F.E., Jaeger, W., Gotz, M.L., Schmitz, W., 1986b. Conjunctival
morphology in Sjogrens syndrome and other disorders of the anterior
eye. A light and electron microscopic study based on impression
cytology. Scand. J. Rheumatol. Suppl. 61, 206214.
Lehmann, O.J., Hussain, I.R., Watt, P.J., 2000. Investigation of b defensin
gene expression in the ocular anterior segment by semiquantitative RTPCR. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 94, 523526.
Leonardi, A., Busato, F., Fregona, I., Plebani, M., Secchi, A.G., 2000. Antiinflamatory and antiallergic effects of ketorolac tromethamine in the
conjunctival provocation model. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 84, 1228 1232.
Liu, Z., Carvajal, M., Carothers Carraway, C.A., Carraway, K., Pflugfelder,
S.C., 2000. Increased expression of the type 1 growth factor receptor
family in the conjunctival epithelium of with keratoconjunctivitis sicca.
Am. J. Ophthalmol. 129, 472480.
Liu, Z., Carvajal, M., Carothers Carraway, C.A., Carraway, K., Pflugfelder,
S.C., 2001. Expression of the receocptor tyrosine kinases, epidermal
growth factor receptor, ErbB2, and ErbB3, in human ocular surface
epithelia. Cornea 20, 81 85.
Luzeau, R., Carlier, C., Ellrodt, A., Amedee-Manesme, O., 1988.
Impression cytology with transfer: an easy method for detection of
vitamin A deficiency. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 58, 166170.
Marner, K., 1980. Snake-like appearance of nuclear chromatin in
conjunctival epithelial cells from patients with keratoconjunctivitis
sicca. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh.) 58, 849853.
Martinez, A.J., Mills, M.B., Jaceldo, K.B., Tio, F.O., Aigbivbalu, I.B.,
Hilsenbeck, S.B., Yee, R.W., 1995. Standardization of conjunctival
impression cytology. Cornea 14, 515522.
Maskin, S., Bode, D., 1986. Electron microscopy of impression-acquired
conjunctival epithelial cells. Ophthalmology 93, 15181523.
McKelvie, P.A., Daniell, M., 2001. Impression cytology following
mitomycin C therapy for ocuale surface squamous neoplasia. Br.
J. Ophthalmol. 85, 11151119.
471
Rivas, L., Rodrguez, J.J., Alvarez, M.I., Oroza, M.A., del Castillo, J.M.,
1993. Correlation between impresion cytology and tear function
parameters in Sjogrens sndrome. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh.) 71,
353 359.
Rolando, M., Terragna, F., Giordiano, G., Calabria, G., 1990. Conjunctival
surface damage distribution in keratoconjunctivitis sicca. An impresion
cytology study. Ophthalmologica 200, 170176.
Rolando, M., brezzo, V., Calabria, G., 1994. Ocular surface changes
induced by repeated impresion cytology. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 350,
249 254.
Saez, V., Corrales, R.M., Calonge, M., Herreras, J.M., Diebold, Y.,
2001. Modified staining protocol enables light microscopy evaluation of conjunctival impression cytology samples collected by
polyethersulfone (PES) filter paper. IOVS 2001;42:ARVO Abstract
487.
Saini, J.S., Rajwanshi, A., Dhar, S., 1990. Clinicopathological correlation
of hard contact lens related changes in tarsal conjunctiva by impression
cytology. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh.) 68, 6570.
Sanz, A.I., Rivas, L., Oroza, M.A., Perez-Esteban, A., Murube, J., 2001.
Histopathological and immunohistoquimical study in the ocular
cicatricial pemphigoid. Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftalmol. 7.
Sapci, T., Gurdal, C., Onmus, H., Gokdemir, O., Ozkurt, Y., Sengor, T.,
Akbulut, U.G., 1999. Diagnostic significance of impression cytology in
allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Am. J. Rhinol. 13, 3135.
Seifart, U., Strempel, I., 1994. The dry eye and diabetes mellitus.
Ophthalmologe 91, 235 239.
Shaker, G.J., Ruffini, J., Arora, I., Aquavella, J.V., 1989. Soluble
collagen disks for the treatment of dry eye syndrome. CLAO J. 15,
298 304.
Shen, J.F., McMahon, T.T., Cheng, E.L., Sugar, J., Yue, B.Y.J.T.,
Anderson, R.J., Begley, C., Zhou, J., 2002. Lysosomal hydrolase
staining of conjunctival impression cytology specimens in keratoconus.
Cornea 21, 447452.
Solomon, A., Dilek, D., Liu, Z., Xie, Y., Macri, A., Pflugfelder, S.C., 2001.
Pro- and anti-inflammatory forms of interleukin-1 in the tear fluid and
conjunctiva of patients with dry-eye disease. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis.
Sci. 42, 22832292.
Soong, H.K., Martin, N.F., Wagoner, M.D., Alfonso, E., Mandelbaum,
S.H., Laibson, P.R., Smith, R.E., Udell, I., 1988. Topical retinoid
therapy for squamous metaplasia of various ocular surface disorders. A
multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-masked study. Ophthalmology
95, 14421446.
Stern, M.E., Beuerman, R.W., Fox, R.I., Gao, J., Mircheff, A.K.,
Plugfelder, S.C., 1998. The pathology of dry eye: the interaction
between the ocular surface and lacrimal glands. Cornea 17, 584 589.
Tananuvat, N., Daniell, M., Sullivan, L.J., Yi, Q., McKrlvie, P., McCarty,
D.J., Taylor, H.R., 2001. Controlled study of the use of autologous
serum in dry eye patients. Cornea 20, 802806.
Thatcher, R.W., Darougar, S., Jones, B.R., 1977. Conjunctival impression
cytology. Arch. Ophthalmol. 95, 678 681.
Thiel, M.A., Bossart, W., Bernauer, W., 1997. Improved impression
cytology techniques for the immunopathological diagnosis of superficial viral infections. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 81, 984988.
Tole, D.M., McKelvie, P.A., Daniell, M., 2001. Reliability of impression
cytology for the diagnosis of ocular surface squamous neoplasia
emplying the Biopore membrane. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 85, 154158.
Toshida, H., Nakata, K., Hamano, T., Nakamura, M., Nguyen, D.,
Beuerman, R.W., 2002. Effect of gefarnate on the ocular surface in
squirrel monkeys. Cornea 21, 292 299.
Tseng, S.C.G., 1985. Staging of conjunctival squamous metaplasia by
impression cytology. Ophthalmology 92, 728 733.
Tseng, S.C.G., Huang, A.J., Sutter, D., 1987. Purification and characterization of rabbit ocular mucin. Invest. Phthalmol. Vis. Sci. 28, 14731482.
Tseng, S.H., Chen, Y.T., Huang, F.C., Jin, Y.T., 1999. Seborrheic keratosis
of conjunctiva simulating a malignant melanoma: an immunocytochemical study with impression cytology. Ophthalmology 106,
15161520.
472
Tseng, S.H., Chen, Y.T., Chen, H.C., Huang, F.C., Leee, S.C., Chen, F.K.,
2001. Impression cytology study of conjunctival epithelial phenotypes
on the healing ocular surface after pterygium excision. Cornea 20,
244 250.
Udell, I.J., Kenyon, K.R., Sawa, M., Dohlman, C.H., 1986. Treatment of
superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis by thermocauterization of the
superior bulbar conjunctiva. Ophthalmology 93, 162 166.
Underwood, B.A., 1994. Hypovitaminosis A: international programmatic
issues. J. Nutr. 124, 1467S 1472S.
Vadrevu, V.L., Fullard, R.J., 1994. Enhancements to the conjunctival
impression cytology technique and examples of applications in a
clinico-biochemical study of dry eye. CLAO J. 20, 5963.
Williams, K.A., Brereton, H.M., Aggarwal, R., Sykes, P.J., Turner, D.R.,
Russ, G.R., Coster, D.J., 1995. Use of DNA poly morphisms and the
polymerase chain reaction to examine the survival of a human limbal
stem cell allograft. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 120, 342350.
Willis, R.M., Folberg, R., Krachmer, J.H., Holland, E.J., 1987. The treatment
of aqueous-deficient dry eye with removable punctual plugs. A clinical
and impression-cytologic study. Ophthalmology 94, 514 518.
Yang, H.Y., Fujishima, H., Toda, I., Shimazaki, J., Tsubota, K., 1997.
Lacrimal punctal occlusion for the treatment of superior limbic
keratoconjunctivitis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 124, 80 87.
Zaidman, G.W., Billingsley, A., 1998. Corneal impression test for the
diagnosis of acute rabies encephalitis. Ophthalmology 105, 249251.