Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Alan
Sinkin
Tx.
Bar
#18438675
P.
O.
Box
944
Hilo,
Hawaii
96721
(808)
936-4428
lanny.sinkin@gmail.com
Counsel
for
Plaintiff
IN
THE
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
COURT
FOR
THE
DISTRICT
OF
HAWAII
)
Frank
Kamealoha
Anuumealani
Nobriga,
)
Civ.
No.
15-cv-00254
DKW
BMK
In
his
capacity
as
Kahuna
of
the
)
Temple
of
Lono,
)
)
Plaintiff
)
)
AMENDED
COMPLAINT;
Vs.
)
)
)
)
David
Y.
Ige,
in
his
official
capacity
as
)
Governor,
State
of
Hawaii,
)
and
in
his
private
capacity;
)
)
Suzanne
Case,
in
her
official
capacity
as
)
Chairperson,
Department
of
Land
)
And
Natural
Resources,
State
of
)
Hawaii,
and
in
her
private
)
capacity;
)
)
Kekoa
Kaluhiwa,
in
his
official
capacity
as
)
First
Deputy,
Department
of
Land
)
and
Natural
Resoures,
State
of
)
Hawaii,
and
in
his
private
)
capacity;
)
)
Jason
Redulla,
in
his
official
capacity
as
)
Acting
Chief
of
the
State
of
Hawaii
)
Department
of
Land
and
Natural
)
Resources
Division
of
Conservation)
And
Resource
Enforcement;
)
)
Stephanie
Nagata,
in
her
official
capacity
)
as
Director
of
the
Office
of
Mauna
)
Kea
Management,
and
in
her
)
private
capacity;
)
)
Donald
Straney,
in
his
official
capacity
as
)
Chancellor,
University
of
HawaiI
)
at
Hilo,
and
in
his
private
capacity;
)
)
)
David
Chin,
in
his
official
capacity
as
)
State
of
Hawaii
Attorney
General,
)
and
in
his
private
capacity;
)
)
Linda
Chow,
in
her
capacity
as
Deputy
)
Attorney
General,
and
in
her
)
private
capacity;
)
)
Julie
China,
in
her
capacity
as
Deputy
)
Attorney
General,
and
in
her
)
private
capacity;
)
)
Mitch
Roth,
in
his
capacity
as
Hawaii
)
County
Prosecuting
Attorney,
and
)
in
his
private
capacity;
)
)
Damien
Nagata,
in
her
capacity
as
)
Hawaii
County
Deputy
)
Prosecuting
Attorney
and
in
her
)
private
capacity;
)
)
Elizabeth
Britt
Bailey,
in
her
capacity
as
)
HawaiI
County
Deputy
)
Prosecuting
Attorney
and
in
her
)
Private
capacity;
and
)
)
John
or
Jane
Doe
#1,
in
his
or
her
official
)
capacity
and
private
capacity
)
)
Defendants
)
________________________________________________)
NOW
COMES,
FRANK
KAMEHALOHA
ANUUMEALANI
NOBRIGA
and
files
this
First
Amended
Complaint
seeking
assistance
from
this
Honorable
Court
in
protecting
the
rights
of
those
embracing
the
traditional
faith
of
the
Hawaiian
people
to
practice,
the
rights
of
those
having
traditional
and
customary
access
to
Mauna
a
law
and
the
due
process
requirements
of
the
Fifth
Amendment
to
the
United
States
Constitution.
7.
Plaintiff
alleges
that
Defendants
are
restricting
the
spiritual
practices
of
those
embracing
the
traditional
faith
of
the
Hawaiian
people
in
violation
of
rights
protected
by
the
State
of
Hawaii
Constitution
and
statutes.
8.
Plaintiff
alleges
that
the
Defendants
are
restricting
the
traditional
and
customary
rights
of
the
Hawaiian
people
in
violation
of
protections
provided
to
those
rights
in
the
Constitution
and
laws
of
the
State
of
Hawaii.
9.
Plaintiff
alleges
that
the
actions
taken
by
Defendants
are
part
of
a
conspiracy
forming
a
coordinated
effort
to
suppress
the
First
Amendment
rights
of
those
who
seek
to
prevent
the
desecration
of
a
sacred
site
by
stopping
the
construction
of
a
private
astronomical
facility.
10.
Plaintiff
alleges
that
the
Defendants
are
prepared
to
pursue
construction
of
the
Thirty
Meter
Telescope
without
regard
for
burials
and
altars
in
violation
of
Federal
and
State
Constitutions
and
statutes.
11.
Plaintiff
is
further
alleging
that
the
Defendants
intend
to
use
the
illegal
and
unconstitutional
rules
and
regulations
to
punish
people
for
exercising
their
rights
to
practice
their
faith
by
arrests,
disruption
of
their
spiritual
ceremony,
seizure
of
personal
possessions,
ejection
from
the
restricted
area,
or
other
punishments.
12.
Finally,
Plaintiff
alleges
that
Defendants
intend
to
use
the
illegal
and
unconstitutional
rules
and
regulations
to
punish
those
exercising
their
rights
to
engage
in
protected
speech,
assembly,
and
petition
for
redress
by
arrests,
seizure
of
personal
possessions,
ejection
from
the
restricted
area,
or
other
punishments.
Plaintiff
13.
Plaintiff
is
the
Kahuna
of
the
Temple
of
Lono,
a
traditional
faith
of
the
Hawaiian
people.
Respondents
14.
David
Y.
Ige
is
Governor
of
the
State
of
Hawaii
and
is
named
in
his
official
capacity
and
his
private
capacity.
15.
Suzanne
Case
is
Chairperson
of
the
State
of
Hawaii
Department
of
Land
and
Natural
Resources
(DLNR)
1
and
is
named
in
her
official
capacity
and
her
private
capacity.
16.
Kekoa
Kaluhiwa
is
Deputy
Director
of
DLNR
and
is
named
in
his
official
capacity
and
his
private
capacity.
17.
Jason
Redulla
is
acting
Chief
of
the
State
of
Hawaii
Land
and
Natural
Resources
Division
of
Conservation
and
Resource
Enforcement
and
is
named
in
his
official
capacity
and
his
private
capacity.
18.
Stephanie
Nagata
is
the
Director
of
the
Office
of
Mauna
Kea
Management
(OMKM)
and
is
named
in
her
official
capacity.2
1
The
Department
of
Land
and
Natural
Resources,
headed
by
an
executive
Board
of
2
Office
of
Mauna
Kea
Management(OMKM)
-
The
Maunakea
Management
Board
provides
the
community
with
a
sustained
direct
voice
for
the
management
of
the
Maunakea.
The
Board
is
comprised
of
seven
members
from
the
community
who
are
nominated
by
the
UH
Hilo
Chancellor
and
approved
by
the
UH
Board
of
Regents.
The
volunteer
members
represent
a
cross-section
of
the
community
and
serve
as
the
communitys
voice
providing
input
on
operations
and
activities,
developing
policies,
reviewing
and
providing
recommendations
for
land
uses
planned
for
Maunakea.
http://www.malamamaunakea.org/management/mauna-kea-management-board
19.
Donald
Straney
is
Chancellor
of
the
University
of
Hawaii
at
Hilo
and
is
named
in
his
official
capacity
and
his
private
capacity.
20.
David
Chin
is
Hawaii
Attorney
General
and
is
named
in
his
official
capacity
and
his
private
capacity.
21.
Linda
Chow
is
Hawaii
Deputy
Attorney
General
and
is
named
in
her
official
capacity
and
her
private
capacity.
22.
Julie
China
is
Hawaii
Deputy
Attorney
General
and
is
named
in
her
official
capacity
and
her
private
capacity.
23.
Mitch
Roth
is
Hawaii
County
Prosecuting
Attorney
and
is
named
in
his
official
capacity
and
his
private
capacity.
24.
Demien
Nagata
is
Hawaii
County
Deputy
Prosecuting
Attorney
and
is
named
in
her
official
capacity
and
her
private
capacity.
25.
Elizabeth
Britt
Bailey
is
Hawaii
County
Deputy
Prosecuting
Attorney
and
is
named
in
her
official
capacity
and
her
private
capacity.
26.
John
or
Jane
Doe
#1,
yet
to
be
identified,
is
a
co-conspirator
in
the
conspiracy
alleged
in
this
Amended
Complaint
and/or
also
responsible
for
imposing
rules
or
enforcing
rules
designed
to
suppress
the
political
movement
opposing
the
TMT
and/or
that
restrict
traditional
and
customary
practices
on
Mauna
a
Wkea,
including
spiritual
practices,
and
is
named
in
his
or
her
official
capacity
and
private
capacity.
Facts
27.
There
is
a
major
controversy
over
the
proposal
to
build
the
Thirty
Meter
Telescope
(TMT)
on
Mauna
a
Wkea,
a
mountain
on
the
Island
of
Hawaii
held
Cultural Significance
of
Hawaii,
and
State
of
Hawaii,
the
practitioners
of
the
traditional
Hawaiian
faith
still
had
complete
and
unfettered
access
to
the
Mountain.
45.
As
the
stolen
lands
belonging
to
the
Kingdom
of
Hawaii
passed
into
the
hands
of
the
so-called
State
of
Hawaii,
the
State
began
to
make
use
of
the
lands.
46.
The
State
of
Hawaii
Department
of
Land
and
Natural
Resources
(DLNR)
became
manager
of
the
stolen
lands,
including
Mauna
a
Wkea.
47.
The
DLNR
leased
some
of
the
lands
on
Mauna
a
Wkea
to
the
University
of
Hawaii,
a
public
institution.
48.
Beginning
in
the
1970s,
the
University
of
Hawaii
leased
lands
on
Mauna
a
Wkea
to
private
corporations
and
foreign
governments
for
the
building
of
telescopes.
49.
The
University
of
Hawaii
issued
these
leases
for
telescopes
over
the
objections
of
numerous
people
and
organizations.
50.
The
sacredness
of
the
Mountain
and
the
desecration
by
the
telescopes
formed
part
of
the
objections.
51.
There
are
currently
thirteen
working
telescopes
on
Mauna
a
Wkea.
52.
The
TMT
is
the
most
recent
telescope
to
be
sited
on
Mauna
a
Wkea.
53.
Despite
all
the
telescopes,
the
unfettered
access
to
the
Mountain
for
spiritual
practice
continued.
situation
existed
when
the
Germans
installed
the
Vichy
Government
in
France
during
World
War
II.
Fortunately
for
the
French
people,
they
recovered
their
legitimate
government.
The
Hawaiians
have
not
been
so
fortunate.
54.
Recently,
however,
various
agencies
within
the
surrogate
government
known
as
the
State
of
Hawaii
have
asserted
their
right
to
restrict
the
practice
of
the
traditional
faith
on
the
Mountain.
55.
These
same
agencies
have
made
no
attempt
to
impose
restrictions
on
any
other
faith,
religion,
or
spiritual
tradition
found
in
the
islands.
56.
The
impetus
for
these
restrictions
is
the
massive
opposition
that
has
emerged
to
the
construction
of
the
Thirty
Meter
Telescope
on
the
sacred
Mountain.
57.
Part
of
the
basis
for
that
controversy
is
the
continuing
assertion
by
practitioners
of
the
traditional
Hawaiian
faith
that
the
mountain
is
sacred
and
that
the
construction
of
the
telescope
constitutes
desecration
of
a
sacred
site.
58.
Those
seeking
to
prevent
desecration
refer
to
themselves
as
Protectors
and
object
to
being
termed
protestors.
59.
Another
component
of
the
opposition
to
the
TMT
is
that
the
telescope
is
being
built
on
lands
belonging
to
the
Kingdom
of
Hawaii
without
permission
of
the
Kingdom.
60.
Access
to
the
Mountain
by
car
is
limited
to
one
road,
known
as
the
Mauna
Kea
Observatory
Access
Road.
61.
On
October
7,
2014,
the
Protectors
attempted
to
drive
up
the
Mountain
to
attend
the
ground-breaking
ceremony
for
the
TMT.
62.
State
vehicles
blocked
the
Protectors
from
ascending
the
road.
63.
That
State
blockade
resulted
in
everyone
else
coming
to
the
ceremony
also
not
being
able
to
ascend
the
Mountain.
64.
As
a
result,
the
ceremony
was
cancelled.
10
65.
At
the
end
of
March
2015
and
in
the
first
week
of
April
2015,
Protectors
blockaded
the
access
road
twice
in
an
attempt
to
prevent
TMT
workers
from
ascending
the
Mountain.
66.
The
second
time,
police
arrested
31
people.
67.
The
TMT
construction
workers
did
reach
the
construction
site.
68.
The
arrests,
however,
led
to
a
suspension
of
TMT
construction.
69.
Despite
the
absence
of
any
criminal
intent
on
the
part
of
those
acting
to
prevent
desecration,
the
Hawaii
County
Prosecutor
charged
some
of
those
arrested
with
trespassing
onto
their
sacred
Mountain.
70.
Others
were
charged
with
obstruction.
71.
The
prosecutions
for
trespassing
emerged
as
part
of
a
broader
plan,
initiated
in
April
by
State
officials,
including
and
not
limited
to
Defendant
Damien
Nagata,
to
suppress
the
opposition
to
the
TMT
72.
In
May,
various
officials
of
the
State,
including
and
not
limited
to
Defendants
Case,
Redulla,
and
Roth,
had
begun
to
develop
a
plan
to
remove
the
Protectors
from
the
Mountain
and
prevent
their
interacting
with
the
TMT
construction
crews
going
up
the
Mountain.
73.
Subsequently,
Defendants
Kaluhiwa,
Chow,
China,
Bailey,
joined
the
conspiracy
planning
the
suppression.
74.
That
plan
included
closing
the
Mauna
Kea
Observatory
Access
Road
in
such
a
way
as
to
avoid
revealing
that
the
true
intent
of
the
closure
was
to
frustrate
any
efforts
by
the
Protectors
to
prevent
construction
of
the
TMT.
11
75.
The
Hawaii
County
Prosecutors
Office
and
the
University
of
Hawaii
coordinated
their
suppression
efforts
with
the
attorneys
for
the
Thirty
Meter
Telescope
through
pursuit
of
the
trespassing
charges.
76.
The
Hawaii
County
Prosecutors
Office
and
the
University
of
Hawaii
received
a
legal
memorandum
from
the
TMT
attorneys
on
how
to
defeat
the
legal
claims
of
the
Protectors
regarding
the
continued
existence
of
the
Kingdom,
sovereignty,
jurisdiction
and
other
legal
issues.
77.
Subsequently
the
Prosecutor
filed
nolle
prosequi
motions
requesting
to
dismiss
all
the
trespassing
cases.
78.
While
the
Prosecutor
knew
by
May
18
that
he
was
going
to
dismiss
the
trespassing
charges,
he
delayed
filing
the
motion
until
May
25,
requiring
the
trespassing
defendants
to
expend
whatever
resources
were
required
to
file
all
pretrial
motions
in
a
case
that
the
Prosecutor
knew
he
was
going
to
be
dismiss.
79.
The
Prosecutor
asked
for
the
dismissals
to
be
without
prejudice.
80.
The
Prosecutor
subsequently
stated
that
he
might
refile
the
charges
at
a
later
time.
81.
The
State
Court
granted
the
motion
without
prejudice
to
the
Prosecutor
refiling
the
charge
at
a
later
date.
82.
The
State
Court
granted
the
motion
without
allowing
an
opportunity
for
any
of
the
trespass
defendants
to
object
to
the
dismissal
or
the
nature
of
the
dismissal
as
without
prejudice.
12
83.
While
the
citations
for
those
arrested
called
for
them
to
appear
in
Hilo,
Hawaii,
the
Prosecutor
and
the
Court,
absent
any
request
from
defendants,
proceeded
to
change
the
venue
to
Waimea,
requiring
a
lengthy
trip
for
many
of
the
defendants.
84.
The
Protectors
established
a
24
hour
a
day
vigil
at
the
9,000
foot
level
to
ensure
construction
workers
did
not
ascend
to
the
site.
85.
The
State
officials
involved
in
the
conspiracy
knew
that
the
purpose
of
their
activity
was
to
prevent
the
Protectors
from
exercising
rights
protected
by
the
United
States
Constitution
and
the
Hawaiian
Constitution.
86.
The
State
officials
tried
to
develop
a
plan
that
would
disguise
the
targeting
of
the
Protectors
by
adoption
of
a
rule
of
more
general
applicability
to
Mauna
a
Wkea
and
areas
outside
the
Mauna
a
Wakea
lands
that
would
achieve
the
targeting
goal
while
obscuring
the
visibility
of
that
goal.
87.
On
Wednesday,
June
24,
2015,
an
attempt
was
made
to
bring
a
construction
crew
to
the
site
of
the
TMT.
88.
Hundreds
of
people
gathered
to
protect
the
Mountain
and
prevent
what
they
considered
desecration.
89.
The
construction
crew
was
first
preceded
by
County
of
Hawaii
police
officers.
90.
From
the
9,000
foot
level
and
continuing
up
the
mountain,
hundreds
of
Protectors
of
Mauna
a
Wkea
blocked
the
progress
of
the
convoy.
91.
While
in
the
County
jurisdiction,
the
moving
blockade
and
the
County
police
proceeded
peacefully
up
the
mountain.
92.
In
the
County
jurisdiction,
there
was
only
one
arrest,
which
took
place
without
incident.
13
93.
At
the
10,000
foot
level,
the
jurisdiction
changed
to
the
DLNR.
94.
In
the
DLNR
jurisdiction,
the
officers
became
more
aggressive
and
arrests
increased.
95.
In
response
to
the
more
aggressive
DLNR
actions,
Protectors
further
up
the
Mountain
placed
rocks
and
rock
walls
in
the
roadway
to
obstruct
the
progress
of
the
convoy
without
requiring
interaction
between
the
Protectors
and
the
DLNR
officers.
96.
When
the
convoy
reached
the
rocks,
DLNR
made
the
decision
to
abandon
the
effort
to
reach
the
TMT
site.
97.
The
convoy
turned
around
and
descended
the
Mountain.
98.
By
Friday,
June
26,
2015,
the
Protectors
had
removed
all
the
rock
obstructions
from
the
road.
99.
In
their
zeal
to
prevent
a
repetition
of
the
successful
blockade,
State
agencies
enacted
new
rules
to
shut
down
the
Protectors
that
also
had
or
have
adverse
impacts
on
the
traditional
faith
practices,
on
traditional
and
customary
Native
Hawaiian
rights,
and
preservation
of
Native
Hawaiian
cultural
values..
100.
The
Office
of
Mauna
Kea
Management
(OMKM)
took
various
punitive
measures.
101.
After
the
successful
blockade,
the
Office
of
Mauna
Kea
Management
(OMKM)
closed
the
Visitor
Center
at
the
9,000
foot
level
where
the
Protectors
had
set
up
their
vigil
site.
102.
OMKM
cut
off
the
water
at
the
9,000
foot
level.
103.
OMKM
locked
up
the
bathrooms
in
the
Visitor
Center.
104.
OMKM
locked
up
the
portable
bathrooms
on
site.
14
105.
When
the
Protectors
arranged
for
porta
potties
to
be
brought
to
the
site,
DLNR
threated
to
levy
fines
against
the
porta
potty
companies
and
seize
their
equipment,
if
they
did
not
remove
the
porta
potties
from
the
site.
106.
The
porta
potties
were
removed
leaving
the
area
without
bathroom
facilities
for
the
hundreds
of
people
coming
up
to
the
Mountain
on
a
daily
basis.
107.
As
part
of
the
greater
plan
to
suppress
the
rights
of
the
Protectors,
the
Office
of
Mauna
Kea
Management
(OMKM)
issued
the
first
set
of
rules
and
regulations
targeting
spiritual
practices
for
restrictions.
108.
The
OMKM
conducted
no
public
process
in
adopting
the
restrictions.
109.
The
OMKM
issued
the
rules
with
no
prior
public
notice.
110.
The
OMKM
issued
the
rules
with
no
prior
publication.
111.
OMKM
adopted
the
rules
without
consulting
the
Kahu
K
Mauna.4
112.
The
OMKM
issued
the
rules
with
no
opportunity
for
public
comment.
113.
Even
after
adoption,
the
OMKM
never
published
the
rules.
114.
The
new
restrictions
included
rules
and
regulations
preventing
some
spiritual
practices
altogether
in
certain
forms
and
certain
time
frames.
115.
The
OMKM
rules
required
those
wishing
to
engage
in
spiritual
practice
on
the
Mountain
to
present
themselves
to
an
OMKM
Ranger
at
1:00
p.m.
4
Kahu
K
Mauna
(Guardians
of
the
Mountain)
is
a
volunteer
community-based
council
whose
members
are
from
the
native
Hawaiian
community.
Kahu
K
Mauna
advises
the
Mauna
Kea
Management
Board,
OMKM,
and
the
UH
Hilo
Chancellor
on
Hawaiian
cultural
matters
affecting
the
UH
Management
Areas.
They
review
proposed
projects
and
give
their
input
to
the
Mauna
Kea
Management
Board.
A
member
of
Kahu
K
Mauna
participates
in
the
discussions
of
the
Mauna
Kea
Management
Board
during
their
public
meetings.
15
116.
Access
at
1:00
p.m.
would
be
the
only
time
the
spiritual
practitioners
could
ascend
the
Mountain
to
practice.
117.
The
OMKM
Rangers
denied
permission
for
people
arriving
after
1:00
p.m.
to
ascend
the
Mountain
for
spiritual
purposes.
118.
OMKM
Rangers
have
no
law
enforcement
authority.
119.
OMKM
also
limited
the
number
of
people
that
could
ascend
the
Mountain
for
pule
(prayer)
or
other
practice
to
no
more
than
ten.
120.
OMKM
required
the
spiritual
practitioners
to
be
accompanied
by
a
Ranger.
121.
OMKM
limited
the
time
during
which
spiritual
practice
could
take
place
to
one
hour.
122.
OMKM
defined
the
site
where
the
spiritual
practitioners
could
go
to
practice.
123.
These
rules
and
regulation
applied
only
to
those
engaged
in
spiritual
practice,
not
to
any
other
persons
ascending
the
Mountain.
124.
During
the
same
period
of
time
that
the
OMKM
rules
and
regulation
were
being
enforced,
water
trucks,
nitrogen
trucks,
astronomers,
and
others
freely
transited
the
access
road
throughout
the
day
and
into
the
night.
125.
The
OMKM
rules
and
regulations
were
not
based
on
any
inquiry
into
or
attempt
to
accommodate
the
practices
being
suppressed.
126.
The
OMKM
rules
and
regulations
demonstrated
a
profound
ignorance
of
the
practices
of
the
traditional
faith.
127.
The
OMKM
restrictions
prohibited
long
standing
practices
that
posed
no
threat
to
public
health
and
safety.
16
128.
The
OMKM
restrictions
were
capricious
and
arbitrary
with
no
basis
in
any
action
or
practice
attributable
to
faith
practitioners.
129.
The
OMKM
lacks
the
statutory
authority
to
enact
such
rules
and
regulations.
130.
The
OMKM
lacks
the
statutory
authority
to
enforce
such
rules
and
regulations.
131.
Lacking
its
own
authority,
OMKM
called
in
other
law
enforcement
agencies
to
enforce
the
restrictions
announced
by
OMKM.
132.
After
the
filing
of
this
suit
challenging
the
restrictions
as
clearly
unconstitutional
and
illegal,
OMKM
removed
the
restrictions.
133.
The
decision
to
remove
the
restrictions
was
also
made
without
any
public
process
or
explanation.
134.
There
is
nothing
to
indicate
that
OMKM
will
not
impose
such
restrictions
again,
absent
some
direction
from
the
Court.
135.
The
next
State
agency
to
further
the
conspiracy
to
suppress
the
Protectors
political
movement
by
issuing
new
rules
and
regulations
restricting
access
to
the
Mountain
was
the
State
Department
of
Land
and
Natural
Resources
(DLNR).
136.
After
the
Protectors
successful
blockade
on
June
24,
2015,
DLNR
closed
the
Mauna
Kea
Observatory
Access
Road
to
the
public.
137.
Then
DLNR
declared
an
emergency
to
exist
that
required
adoption
of
the
new
rules
without
conforming
to
the
normal
statutory
requirements
for
agency
rule
making.
138.
The
reasons
given
for
declaring
the
emergency
were
all
pretexts.
17
139.
The
planning
for
the
restrictions
on
access
to
the
Mountain
were
begun
no
later
than
May
before
most
of
the
pretexts
offered
by
the
OMKM
for
declaring
an
emergency
took
place.
140.
The
plan
developed
by
the
conspirators
involved
using
the
Game
Mammal
Hunting
rules
of
the
DLNR
Division
of
Forestry
and
Wildlife5
to
enact
the
suppression
restrictions.
141.
The
only
imminent
peril
to
public
health
on
Mauna
a
Wkea
was
created
when
OMKM
closed
the
Visitor
Center
bathrooms,
locked
up
the
porta
potties,
and
demanded
the
removal
of
the
porta
potties
brought
up
to
the
Mountain
by
the
Protectors
to
provide
sanitation
for
visitors
and
themselves.
142.
Other
than
the
ban
on
toilets,
there
is
no
imminent
peril
to
public
safety
or
morals
on
Mauna
a
Wkea.
143.
There
is
no
imminent
peril
to
livestock
of
poultry
health.
144.
There
is
no
emergency
existing
related
to
the
actual
regulatory
functions
of
DLNR.
145.
There
is
no
natural
condition
on
Mauna
a
Wkea
calling
for
emergency
measures.
146.
There
is
no
imminent
threat
to
natural
resources
on
Mauna
a
Wkea
calling
for
emergency
measures.
The
mission
of
DLNRs
Division
of
Forestry
and
Wildlife
is
to
responsibly
manage
and
protect
watersheds,
native
ecosystems,
and
cultural
resources
and
provide
outdoor
recreation
and
sustainable
forest
products
opportunities,
while
facilitating
partnerships,
community
involvement
and
education.
Mlama
i
ka
ina.
5
18
147.
The
desire
of
State
agencies
to
aid
and
abet
the
desecration
of
a
sacred
site
by
enabling
the
construction
of
the
TMT
does
not
constitute
an
emergency.
148.
There
is
no
deadline
for
constructing
the
TMT.
149.
There
is
litigation
pending
that
might
end
up
revoking
the
permits
for
TMT.
150.
There
is
no
crisis
of
any
kind
calling
for
emergency
measures
to
be
taken.
151.
The
real
reason
for
the
new
rules
was
to
drive
the
Protectors
of
the
Mountain
off
the
Mountain
in
preparation
for
resuming
the
attempt
to
construct
the
telescope.
152.
The
rules
adopted
by
the
Board
of
Land
and
Natural
Resources
states:
13-123-21. 2 Prohibited activities.
(a) The area referred to in this Rule as the restricted area is defined as any lands in
the public hunting area that includes the Mauna Kea Observatory Access Road and
one mile on either side of the Mauna Kea Observatory Access road.
(b) As used in this Rule, the term transiting means operating, or being a passenger
in, a motor vehicle travelling at a reasonable and prudent speed and having regard to
the actual and potential hazards and conditions then existing.
(c) No person shall at any time possess or control in the restricted area any of the
following items: sleeping bag, tent, camping stove, or propane burner. 3
(d)
No
person
shall
enter
or
remain
in
the
restricted
area
during
the
hours
of
10:00
p.m.
to
4:00
a.m.,
unless
the
person
is
transiting
through
the
restricted
area
on
the
Mauna
Kea
Observatory
Access
Road
or
is
lawfully
within
or
entering
or
exiting
an
existing
observatory
or
a
facility
operated
by
the
University
of
Hawaii.
153.
The
restricted
area
is
capriciously
and
arbitrarily
defined
as
lands
within
one
mile
of
the
Mauna
Kea
Observatory
Access
Road.
154.
This
restriction
has
no
rational
relationship
to
any
regulatory
objective
supported
by
the
actual
authority
of
DLNR.
155.
The
plan
developed
by
the
conspirators
involved
using
the
Game
Mammal
Hunting
rules
to
achieve
their
political
goals.
19
20
21
174.
All
these
suggested
rules
would
further
the
conspiracy
to
suppress
the
Protectors
political
movement
and
spiritual
practices
conducted
for
more
than
1,000
years.
175.
Defendant
Governor
David
Y.
Ige
suggested
that
he
might
call
out
the
National
Guard
to
ensure
the
Protectors
cannot
again
conduct
a
successful
blockade.
176.
Based
on
the
facts
set
forth
above,
various
State
of
Hawaii
agencies
are
engaged
in
a
concerted
and
coordinated
conspiracy
to
drive
the
Protectors
off
the
Mountain
and
prevent
a
recurrence
of
the
blockade
or
other
obstruction
action
when
the
TMT
workers
try
again
to
desecrate
the
sacred
site.
177.
The
cumulative
effect
of
all
the
rules
and
regulations
is
to
suppress
the
rights
of
the
people
to
assemble
to
petition
for
redress
of
grievances,
engage
in
protected
speech,
and
to
otherwise
object
to
the
flawed
decision
by
the
TMT
and
its
State
proponents
to
build
the
telescope
on
Mauna
a
Wkea,
rather
than
build
on
other
sites
available
or
pursue
the
same
purpose
through
space-based
telescopes.
178.
The
direct
and
indirect
impacts
of
the
rules
and
regulations
on
the
spiritual
practice
of
the
traditional
Hawaiian
faith
violate
the
rights
of
the
spiritual
practitioners.
179.
Ultimately,
people
are
being
targeted
for
law
enforcement
action
because
they
are
Hawaiians,
insisting
on
their
faith
and
their
nationality.
180.
As
stated
by
the
King
in
a
recent
letter
to
the
Adjutant
General
of
the
Hawaii
National
Guard:
Note:
Under
Article
I,
Section
8,
Clause
15
[United
States
Constitution].
The
protectors
of
Mauna
a
Wkea
are
not
in
violation.
The
protest
is
peaceful
and
in
the
spirit
of
Kapu
Aloha.
They
are
in
harmony
with
nature,
the
elements,
each
other
and
their
surroundings.
They
are
not
insurrectionist
to
be
22
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________________________
LANNY
ALAN
SINKIN
DATED:
July
23,
2015
23