Accepted Manuscript

Title: Preparation and Characterization of Potato Starch

Nanocrystal Reinforced Natural Rubber Nanocomposites
Author: K.R. Rajisha Hanna J. Maria L.A. Pothan Zakiah
Ahmad S. Thomas
PII:
DOI:
Reference:

S0141-8130(14)00166-4
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.013
BIOMAC 4225

To appear in:

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Received date:
Revised date:
Accepted date:

16-12-2013
5-3-2014
7-3-2014

Please cite this article as: K.R. Rajisha, L.A. Pothan, Z. Ahmad, S. Thomas,
Preparation and Characterization of Potato Starch Nanocrystal Reinforced Natural
Rubber Nanocomposites, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (2014),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.013
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.

Preparation and Characterization of Potato Starch Nanocrystal Reinforced Natural Rubber

Nanocomposites

ip
t

K.R. Rajishaa, Hanna.J.Mariab, L.A. Pothanc, Zakiah Ahmadd, and S. Thomasb,e*

Department of Chemistry, CMS College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.

School of Chemical Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi University, Priyadarsini Hills, Kottayam

us

cr

10

Department of Chemistry, Bishop Moore College, Mavelikara-690101, Kerala, India.

UiTM, Mara Malaysia, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi University, Priyadarsini

11

an

Kerala, India.

te

Hills, Kottayam, Kerala,India.

12

14

15

16

17

*Corresponding author:

Ac
ce
p

13

18

Sabu Thomas, Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi University,

19

Priyadarsini Hills, Kottayam 686560, Kerala.Ph:09447223452, 0481-2730003

20

Email id:sabuchathukulam@yahoo.co.uk, sabupolymer@yahoo.com

21

Page 1 of 29

Abstract

23

Potato starch nanocrystals were found to serve as an effective reinforcing agent for natural rubber

24

(NR). Starch nanocrystals were obtained by the sulfuric acid hydrolysis of potato starch granules.

25

After mixing the latex and the starch nanocrystals, the resulting aqueous suspension was cast into

26

film by solvent evaporation method. The composite samples were successfully prepared by varying

27

filler loadings, using a colloidal suspension of starch nanocrystals and NR latex. The morphology of

28

the nanocomposite prepared was analyzed by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy

29

(FESEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). FESEM analysis revealed the size and

30

shape of the crystal and their homogeneous dispersion in the composites. The crystallinity of the

31

nanocomposites were studied using XRD analysis which indicated an overall increase in crystallinity

32

with filler content. The mechanical properties of the nanocomposites such as stress-strain behaviour,

33

tensile strength, tensile modulus and elongation at break were measured according to ASTM

34

standards. The tensile strength and modulus of the composites were found to improve tremendously

35

with increasing nanocrystal content. This dramatic increase observed can be attributed to the

36

formation of starch nanocrystal network. This network immobilizes the polymer chains leading to

37

an increase in the modulus and other mechanical properties.

cr

us

an

te

Ac
ce
p

38

ip
t

22

39

Key words: bionanocomposite, starch, nanocrystal.

40

1. Introduction

41

Nanocomposite materials find considerable interest recently among researchers and industrialists.

42

Synthetic nanomaterials lack easy processability, biocompatibility, and biodegradability and hence

43

have limitations compared to natural nanomaterials. Biodegradable nanocomposites which have

Page 2 of 29

44

superior thermal, barrier and mechanical properties can be synthesized from biopolymer and

45

nanosized reinforcements. They are formed by the combination of natural polymers and inorganic

46

solids which possess at least one dimension in the nanometer scale.

47

nanocomposites, which involve synthetic polymers, these biohybrid materials exhibit improved

48

structural and functional properties of great interest for different applications.

49

inherent to the biopolymers, biocompatibility and biodegradability, open new prospects for these

50

hybrid materials with special incidence in regenerative medicine and environment friendly materials

51

(green nanocomposites). Research on bionanocomposites can be regarded as a new interdisciplinary

52

field closely related to significant topics such as biomineralization processes, bioinspired materials,

53

and biomimetic systems. The upcoming development of novel bionanocomposites introducing

54

multifunctionality represents a promising research topic that takes advantage of the synergistic effect

55

of biopolymers with inorganic nanometer-sized solids. Raw materials often used for these new

56

nanostructured composites are natural polymers; clay and nanowhiskers of chitin and cellulose. A

57

possible source of inspiration for the design of new high performance bionanomaterials is due to the

58

fact that they offer excellent reinforcement [1].

59

Starch is an abundant biopolymer, which is totally biodegradable. Starch nanocrystals obtained from

60

starch have been used as fillers in polymeric matrices leading to desired reinforcing effect [2-4].

61

During the last decade, nano-material derived from natural polymers have been used as

62

reinforcement in polymers and have been named as green bionanocomposites [5]. Many research

63

works published in the area of starch based bionanocomposites show the relevance on this topic in

64

the current scenario of polymer research [6-9]. Chitin, cellulose and starch are the crystalline

65

residue that can be obtained from different natural polysaccharides with a uniform structure after

66

acidic or alkaline hydrolysis. These nanoparticles from different sources have different geometrical

ip
t

Similar to conventional

Ac
ce
p

te

an

us

cr

The properties

Page 3 of 29

characteristics. For example, the nanocrystals obtained from cellulose [10] and chitin [11] have a

68

rod shaped structure while that of starch have a platelet shaped structure[12].

69

However, nanocrystals from polysaccharides have the limitation of being hydrophilic and hence are

70

incompatible with hydrophobic polymeric matrices. Therefore, the nanocrystal-matrix interface is

71

usually the weakest point in a biocomposite, which results in the poor performance of the final

72

composite . In order to improve the compatibility between the reinforcing phase and the polymer

73

matrix, the nanoparticles can be physically or chemically modified [12]. An effective method for

74

chemical modification is to graft polymer chains from the matrix directly onto the surface of

75

reinforcing nanoparticles before composite preparation [13].

76

interphase between polysaccharide phase and the polymer matrix phase can improve interfacial

77

adhesion. In addition, entanglements between grafted and ungrafted polymer chains are expected to

78

occur if the molar weight is high enough. By this approach, nanocomposite materials with high

79

content of reinforcing nanoparticles can be prepared. The main polysaccharides of interest as

80

materials for nanocomposite preparation are starch and cellulose, but an increasing attention is also

81

given to the application of the other biopolymers such as chitin and chitosan [14].

The formation of a continuous

Ac
ce
p

te

an

us

cr

ip
t

67

82

Starch is a well-known polymer naturally produced by plants in the form of granules which can

83

be obtained mainly from maize, potatoes, corn, and rice. The properties of these starch granules

84

vary from plant to plant, but are generally composed of , amylose (in most cases about 20% of the

85

granule), and amylopectin. Amylose that builds up to 1535% of the granules in most plants, is a

86

primarily linear polysaccharide with -(14)-linked D-glucose units. Amylopectin, is a highly

87

branched molecule, with (14) linked D-glucose backbones and exhibits about 5% of (16)-

88

linked branches, which have a profound effect on the physical and biological properties. Amylose is

89

semi crystalline and soluble in hot water while amylopectin is insoluble in hot water. During its

Page 4 of 29

90

biodegradation, starch undergo enzyme-catalysed acetal hydrolysis where the - 1,4 link in

91

amylopectin is attacked by glucosidases.[15].

92

polymers contribute to significant differences in starch properties and functionality

93

The focus of this work is to process nanocomposite materials consisting of natural rubber filled with

94

potato starch nanocrystals which is completely biodegradable and thereby replacing the

95

conventionally used .carbon black (manufactured by burning oil or natural gas in controlled

96

conditions).

97

reinforcing agents to replace carbon black in rubber compounds. Recently, Novamont (Novara,

98

Italy), working in partnership with Goodyear Tire and Rubber, has developed tires using

99

nanoparticles derived from corn starch, partially replacing the conventional carbon black and silica

100

used in making tires. This patented innovation, called Biotred, not only presents environmental

101

advantages but also reduces the rolling resistance of tires [16]. Many attempts have been reported to

102

blend polysaccharide nanocrystals with polymeric matrices [17-20]. The resulting nanocomposite

103

materials display outstanding mechanical properties and thermal stability. For example, starch

104

nanocrystals consist of crystalline nanoplatelets about 68 nm thick with a length of 2040 nm and a

105

width of 1530 nm [20]. They have been used as a new kind of fillers, showing interesting

106

reinforcing and barrier properties in natural rubber [21-23].

107

nanocrystals constitute another possible filler for natural rubber which can have an admirable

108

contribution in developing new environmental friendly strong composites [5].

109

Starch nanocrystals, the nanoscale biofiller derived from native starch granules, have been

110

compounded with many different kinds of polymer matrices.

111

nanocrystals, special platelet-like morphology, strong interfacial interactions, and the percolation

cr

ip
t

The structural differences between these two

Ac
ce
p

te

an

us

In the past decades, research works were focused on the development of other

In this approach, potato starch

The intrinsic rigidity of starch

Page 5 of 29

network organized by nanocrystals, contribute to the mechanical performance, thermal properties,

113

solvent absorption, and barrier properties of the composites [24].

114

In the present work, a new nanocomposite based on natural rubber filled with potato starch

115

nanocrystals was prepared. The nanocrystals were characterized by TEM and XRD. By varying the

116

weight percentage of starch nanocrystals in the NR matrix the surface morphology, swelling

117

behavior, and crystallinity of the various composites were investigated. The mechanical properties

118

of the composites were also analyzed.

119

2. Experimental

120

2.1 Materials

121

Natural rubber latex was kindly supplied by Rubber Research Institute of India (RRI, Kottayam,

122

India). It contained spherical particles of natural rubber with an average diameter around 1 m, and

123

the dry rubber content determined was about 60 wt %. The density of dry NR, was 1.4g cm-3, and it

124

contained ~98% of cis-1,4-polyisoprene. Potato starch powder was purchased from Luba chemicals,

125

Mumbai.

126

microorganisms) etc needed for the preparation of starch nanocrystals were obtained from local

127

sources.

128

2.2 Preparation of potato starch nanocrystals

129

Potato starch nanocrystals were prepared by sulfuric acid hydrolysis of native potato starch powder.

130

About 36g of potato starch granules were mixed with 250 ml of 36N H2SO4 for 5 days at 40oC, with

131

a stirring speed of 100 rpm. The aqueous suspension was washed by successive centrifugation with

132

distilled water until neutrality (confirmed by litmus paper testing). At this stage, starch suspension

133

can be believed to be broken into nanocrystals, which changes the refractive index of the solution

134

which is evident from the opaque nature of the suspension. The dispersion was completed by a

te

an

us

cr

ip
t

112

Ac
ce
p

Other chemicals like 36N H2SO4, BaCl2, sodium azoture (protectant against

Page 6 of 29

further 10 min ultrasonic treatment in a B12 Branson sonifier. The resultant aqueous suspension

136

constituted of starch fragments with a homogenous distribution in size. The solid fraction of this

137

aqueous suspension had a weight concentration of about 3.4 wt %.

138

2.3 Preparation of NR latex/starch nanocrystal nanocomposite films

ip
t

135

The aqueous suspension of potato starch nanocrystal and the NR latex were mixed in various

140

proportions at ambient temperature using a mechanical stirrer (IKA-RW 28). The mixing was

141

carried out for 15 minutes to ensure uniform dispersion. Then the mixture was kept for 1 hour in

142

order to ensure homogenization and also for the sedimentation of impurities. The mixture was

143

stored under vacuum and stirred on a rotavapor for 10 minutes in order to degass the mixture and to

144

avoid the formation of irreversible bubbles during water evaporation. The films with uniform

145

thickness were obtained by casting on a glass mold and was evaporated at 40oC in a ventilated oven

146

for 4-6 hours and then heated at 60oC under vacuum for 2 hrs. The resulting films were conditioned

147

at room temperature in desiccators containing P2O5 Fig. 1 shows the flow chart of the preparation

148

method adopted.

149

InsertFig.1.

150

The weight fractions of the sample and their compositions are listed in Table .1.

151

Insert Table 1

152

3. Characterization Techniques

153

3.1 Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

154

The morphology of the nanocrystals was investigated by means of TEM (JEM-2100HRTEM). The

155

micrographs were obtained in point to point resolution 0.194 nm, operating at an accelerating

156

voltage of 200 kV. The suspension was placed on a 300 mesh Cu grid (35 mm diameter).

Ac
ce
p

te

an

us

cr

139

Page 7 of 29

3.2 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM)

158

Morphology of the composites was studied using field emission scanning electron microscopy. A

159

FESEM, CARC-ZEISS, SUPRA40 UP was used to observe the morphology of starch nanocrystal

160

and different starch nanocomposite. The films were sputter coated with platinum to ensure

161

conduction observed with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV .

162

3.3 X-ray diffraction (XRD)

163

X-ray diffraction patterns were taken by using Ni- filtered Cu-K radiation (=0.154 nm) by Bruker

164

D8 Advanced X-Ray Diffractometer. The latex nanocomposite samples were scanned in step mode

165

by 1.5% min scan rate in the range of 2< 12. The specimens of 11cm films were used for the

166

analysis.

167

3.4 Mechanical Measurement

168

Tensile tests: The non linear mechanical properties of the samples were studied using Universal

169

Testing Machine in accordance with ASTM D 412- 2002. Dumbbell shaped specimens 5 mm wide ,

170

8 mm long and about 1 mm thick were used for tensile measurements. The tensile curves obtained

171

were analyzed for strain at break and modulus. The tests were conducted at a crosshead speed of

172

500 mm/ min at ambient temperature. The mechanical properties of nano filled latex composites

173

were studied at ambient temperature.

174

3.5 Water uptake

175

The kinetics of water absorption was determined for all compositions. The specimens were films

176

with dimensions around 10100.2 mm3. The films were thin enough to ensure unidirectional

177

diffusion. After immersion in water, samples were removed at different times, wiped with filter paper to

178

remove surface water and weighed with an analytical balance with 0.1mg resolution. Water induced

Ac
ce
p

te

an

us

cr

ip
t

157

Page 8 of 29

179

dimensional changes were measured with a micrometer having an accuracy of 0.1mm. The water

180

uptake (WU) was calculated using equation (1)

182

ip
t

181

Equation1

cr

183

mo and mt are the weights of the sample before and after a time t of immersion, respectively

185

Water diffusion coefficient (D) of the nanocomposites was calculated using equation(2)

an

186

us

184

Equation2

where, D
h

189

= Thickness of each sample

= Slope of the linear portion of the curve

190

= Water diffusion coefficient

= Weight of the sample at equilibrium

191
192

te

188

187

4. Results and Discussion

194

4.1 Characterization of starch nanocrystals

195

The morphological analysis of starch nanocrystal was done using x-ray diffraction analysis and

196

transmission electron microscopy. The XRD pattern displayed two weak peaks at 2 =11.0, double

197

peak at 2 =14.16 and 2 =19.5 and a strong peak at 2 =22.19 and 2 =25.88 (Fig.2).From the

198

XRD data, it was observed that the diffraction patterns recorded for the lyophilized sample of pure

199

potato starch nanocrystal displayed a typical A-type amylose with X-ray diffraction patterns at 2

200

with the first peak around 15, the second peak near 18, and the third main reflection around 23.

Ac
ce
p

193

Page 9 of 29

A comparative study of the XRD peaks of native starch with prepared starch nanocrystals were also

202

conducted. From the diffractograms, both the native potato starch and hydrolysed potato starch

203

show the characteristic peak at 18 and 23. But these two peaks are more prominent in the

204

diffractogram of potato starch nanocrystal and this indicates the very high extent of crystallinity in

205

starch nanocrystals.

206

Insert Fig. 2

207

The TEM analysis of potato starch nanocrystals lead to the image shown in Fig. 3a. The presence of

208

nanocrystal particles is evidenced by the small dark spots (a few spots are encircled to highlight

209

them). From the TEM image, the average diameter of the nanocrystals is found to be 3 nm which

210

can be confirmed from the particle size analysis (Fig 3b). The samples were found to be free of

211

aggregation and impurities as per the TEM observation. Thus the method used to synthesize

212

nanocrystals does not create impurities. Nanocrystals of the same of nanometers range (920

213

nm).has been reported by Dufresne et al [25].

214

Insert Fig. 3

215

4.2 Morphology of the nanocomposite films

216

The morphology of the NR/starch nanocrystal material were determined from field emission

217

scanning electron microscopy and XRD analysis.

218

The distribution level of the filler within the matrix was evaluated by observing the FESEM image

219

of the surface fractured films. Fig. 4a and 4b show the nanocomposite films of NR nanocomposite

220

with 5 and 10 wt % of nanocrystals respectively. In the FE-SEM micrograph a homogenous

221

dispersion of starch nanocrystals which appears like white dots can be observed.

222

distribution of the nanocrystal in the matrix is clearly seen for the compositions. Such an even and

Ac
ce
p

te

an

us

cr

ip
t

201

A uniform

Page 10 of 29

uniform distribution of the filler in the matrix is essential for obtaining optimum properties. As the

224

filler loading is increased the nanocrystals show a tendency to agglomerate which can be observed in

225

Fig. 4(b) image. The particle size of the nanocrystal was observed to be in the range 12nm and it is

226

in agreement with some earlier work in this area [25].

227

Insert Fig.4

cr

ip
t

223

229

4.3 X-ray diffraction : Structural analysis; Influence of starch content

an

228

us

The nanocomposite films of NR/starch nanocrystals were characterized by X-ray diffraction.

X-ray patterns were collected for different compositions and are displayed in Figure.5.

The

231

diffractograms of unfilled natural rubber and pure potato starch nanocrystal films have also been

232

shown for comparison. The diffraction pattern recorded for a film of pure potato starch nanocrystals

233

obtained by pressing freeze-dried nanocrystals displays typical peaks of A-type amylose allomorph.

234

It is characterized by two weak peaks at 2 = 10.1 and, a strong peak at 18.2, and a strong peak at

235

23.5. The natural rubber film (NR100) displays a typical behavior of a fully amorphous polymer. It

236

is characterized by a broad hump located around 2 = 18.By adding starch nanocrystals, the

237

peaks corresponding to A-type amylose allomorph become stronger and stronger. This shows that

238

an increase of the starch content results in an increase of the global crystallinity of the composite

239

material. Furthermore, X-ray analysis confirmed that the processing by casting and evaporation at

240

40 C did not affect the crystallinity of the starch nanocrystals.

Ac
ce
p

te

230

241

242

Figure 5 X-ray diffraction patterns of starch nanocrystals /NR nanocomposite films

Page 11 of 29

4.5 Mechanical Properties

244

The starch nanocrystal obtained from sulfuric acid hydrolysis was very promising reinforcing

245

material for polymer nanocomposites because of their high stiffness and strength Studies on the

246

reinforcing effect of starch nanocrystals with other fillers like clays, organoclays, carbon black, fly

247

ash, and chitin whiskers in natural rubber matrix reports that starch nanocrystal is a good substitute

248

for carbon black, as it can induce a reinforcing effect in terms of stiffness, strength and elastic

249

behavior. These nanocomposites from renewable resources have the added advantages such as, low

250

cost, easy availability, good biocompatibility, and ease of modification chemically and

251

mechanically.

an

us

cr

ip
t

243

The tensile behavior of the potato starch nanocrystal reinforced with NR latex nanocomposite

253

films was analyzed at room temperature. Figure 6 shows the stress-strain curves of starch- natural

254

rubber composite with increasing starch content. It is found that stress increases regularly with

255

strain till the sample breaks. As the filler loading is increased the tensile strength as well the

256

modulus increases remarkably. The sharp increase in the tensile strength of the NR nanocomposites

257

with addition of the filler shows the reinforcing effect of starch nanocrystal.

258

InsertFig.6.

259

The elongation at break of the nanocomposites was found to be decreased from a value

260

of 1351 for the neat rubber to 536 when 20wt% of the starch nanocrystals were added. Tensile

261

modulus of the nanocomposites also was improved significantly with filler loading. In Fig. 7,

262

the tensile modulus of the NR/ potato starch nanocrystal composites is plotted as a function of

263

starch content. From the graph it is clear that tensile modulus also increases in almost linear fashion.

264

Ac
ce
p

te

252

Page 12 of 29

265

Insert Fig 7
The reinforcing effect of the starch nanocrystals strongly depended on their ability to form a

267

rigid three-dimensional network, resulting in strong interactions such as hydrogen bonds between the

268

filler. Tensile test experiments give clear evidence for the presence of a three-dimensional network

269

within the nanocomposites samples. In higher concentration, there is more number of possible

270

polymerfiller interactions which enhances the reinforcement. The schematic representation given

271

in Fig. 8 shows the possible presence of a three-dimensional network within the nanocomposites.

272

Even though an agglomerated morphology was observed at 10wt% nanocrystal loading the property

273

of the nanocomposites were not affected adversely. Thus, a modification of dispersion method used

274

can possibly give a better dispersion that can result in a further improvement of properties and will

275

be a scope of future studies.

276

Insert Fig 8..

277

4.4 Swelling Behavior

278

The swelling behavior of the composite samples after immersion in distilled water were plotted as a

279

function of time. Swelling studies of samples with a filler loading from 5 to 20 wt % were carried out.

280

The diffusion of water molecules was found to be strongly influenced by the microstructure of the

281

nanocomposites and a clear trend is observed with respect to the starch content.

282

For all the compositions the water uptake increases tremendously at its first zone (below

283

20 hrs) and then reaches a maximum. After reaching the maximum point, there is a

284

decrease for the next 5 hours. On further soaking there is a slight decrease with respect to

285

time and reaches at equilibrium. The diminution of water uptake may be due to the partial

286

release or leaching of starch nano particles in water. The further increase in water uptake with time

Ac
ce
p

te

an

us

cr

ip
t

266

Page 13 of 29

may be due to the migration of starch nanocrystals towards the aqueous phase during

288

swelling. During the exposure of this starch nanocrystals to water, starch domains

289

gets swollen, and the interface between filler and NR matrix weakens which can create

290

free volumes and thereby inducing an increase in swelling rate by the phenomenon

291

known as overshooting effect. This has already been reported for polystyrene-co-butyl acrylate

292

filled with potato starch micro crystal [26].

293

InsertFig.9

294

Diffusion coefficient (D) of NR composites calculated using equation (2) is given in table 2. It was

295

observed that the water diffusion coefficient (D) increases continually as the wt % of starch

296

nanocrystals is increased. It may be due to the formation of a continuous polar network of starch

297

nanocrystal within the NR matrix which seems to favor the swelling of the films by water. The

298

increase in the water diffusion coefficient can be explained as, due to the pathways created by the

299

networks and also due to hydrogen bonding. Increased starch content results in more absorption of

300

water.

301

nanocrystals within the NR matrix is due to the interaction between the starch

302

nanocrystals results in increase rate of water absorption.

303

Insert Table 2.

304

From the water swelling behavior given in Fig.9 it can be observed that the unfilled NR matrix

305

displays the lowest swelling and on addition of nanocrystals induces an increase in water diffusivity.

306

Diffusion coefficient increases roughly and linearly. This can be explained based on the formation

307

of a continuous polar network of starch nanocrystals within the NR matrix. The network seems to

308

favor the swelling by water. The polar network of starch nanocrystals within the NR matrix due to

te

an

us

cr

ip
t

287

The polar network of starch

Ac
ce
p

This has been reported by Duferense at al [12].

Page 14 of 29

309

the interaction between the starch nanocrystals and polymeric chains is represented (Fig.8). The

310

improvement in mechanical properties on adding starch nanocrystals also support this.

312

ip
t

311

Conclusion

Potato starch nanocrystals appeared to be an effective reinforcing agent for natural rubber.

314

Starch nanocrystals were obtained after sulfuric acid hydrolysis of potato starch granules (filler).

315

TEM observations confirmed that the crystals extracted from potato starch granules via acid

316

hydrolysis are in the nanometer dimensions. Nanocomposite material were obtained by casting and

317

evaporating a mixture of NR latex and aqueous suspension of potato starch nanocrystal. Four

318

different compositions were prepared with different wt % of filler for the matrix.

319

observations confirmed that the filler is evenly distributed in the matrix.

320

dispersion of the filler into the polymer matrix is one of the key parameters for obtaining excellent

321

mechanical properties. Wide-angle X-ray analysis showed that the processing by casting and

322

evaporation at 40C did not affect the crystallinity of starch nanocrystal. The diffractograms revealed

323

that, by adding starch nanocrystals into NR resulted in an increase of the global crystallinity of the

324

composite material. The mechanical properties of the prepared composite materials were studied

325

through tensile testing. The reinforcing effect of the prepared nanocrystals thus appears to be an

326

excellent nanofiller for NR latex and have the potential for replacing conventional polymer

327

composite and nanocomposite which are a real threat to the environment. The overall improvement

328

in property was expected to be due to the possible formation of a three-dimensional network of

329

starch nanocrystals within the nanocomposites network.

330

References

FESEM

The homogenous

Ac
ce
p

te

an

us

cr

313

Page 15 of 29

338
339
340
341
342
343
344

ip
t

cr

337

acrylic polymer matrix. Macromol. Symp. 221 (2005) 95104.

4. A. Helene, M. Sonia, D. Danielle, A. Dufresne. Waxy maize starch nanocrystals as filler in

us

336

3. A. Helene,P. Jean-Luc, M. Sonia, D. Danielle, D. Alain. Starch nanocrystal fillers in an

natural rubber. Macromol. Symp 233 (2006) 132136.

5. M. Darder, P. Aranda, E. Ruiz-Hitzky. Bionanocomposites: A new concept of ecological,

an

335

(2008) 484494.

bioinspired, and functional hybrid materials. Adv. Mater 19 (2007) 13091319.

6. H.Y. Kim, D.J.Park, J.Y.Kim, S.T. Lim , Preparation of crystalline starch nanoparticles using

334

2. A. Dufresne. Polysaccharide nano crystal reinforced nanocomposites. . Can. J. Chem., 86

cold acid hydrolysis and ultrasonication . Carbohydrate Polymers :98 (2013) 295 301

333

nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules, 9 (2008) 19741980.

7. D. LeCorre , J.Brass., A. Dufresne, Influence of native starchs properties on starch

te

332

1. Y. Habibi, A. Dufresne. Highly filled bionanocomposites from functionalized polysaccharide

nanocrystals thermal properties Carbohydrate Polymers 87 (2012) 658 666

Ac
ce
p

331

345

8. D. Chen, D. Lawtona, M.R. Thompson, Q. Liub, Biocomposites reinforced with cellulose

346

nanocrystals derived from potato peel waste Carbohydrate Polymers 90 (2012) 709 716

347

9. H.-Y. Kim, J.A Hanb, D.K Kweonc, J.D Parkd, S.T Lima, .Effect of ultrasonic treatments on

348

nanoparticle preparation of acid-hydrolyzewaxy maize starch Carbohydrate Polymers 93

349

(2013) 582 588

350

10. O. van den Berg, J. R Capadona, C. Weder. Preparation of homogeneous dispersions of

351

tunicate cellulose whiskers in organic solvents. Biomacromolecules, 8(2007) 13531357

352

11. Y. Lu, L. Weng, L. Zhang. Morphology and properties of soy protein isolate thermoplastics

353

reinforced with chitin whiskers. Biomacromolecules, 5 (2004) 10461051.

Page 16 of 29

354

12. H. Angellier, L. Choisnard, S. Molina-Biosseau, P. Ozil, A. Dufresne. Optimization of the

355

preparation of aqueous suspensions of waxy maize starch nanocrystals using a response

356

surface methodology. Biomacromolecules, 5 (2004) 15451551.

360

ip
t

359

surface modifications, Langmuir, 22(2006),. 48044810.

14. P. J. Jenkins, A.M. Donald, The effect of acid hydrolyis on native starch granule structure,

cr

358

13. W. Thielemans, M. N. Belgacem, and A. Dufresne, Starch nanocrystals with large chain

StarchStarke, 49 (1997 ) 262267.

us

357

15. T. Materne, F. Corvasce, and P. Leitz, European patent no. EP0995775A1, 2000

362

16. H. Angellier, S. Molina-Boisseau, L. Lebrun , A. Dufresne.. Processing and structural

an

361

properties of waxy maize starch nanocrystals reinforced natural rubber. Macromolecules 38

364

(2005) 37833792

367
368
369
370
371

prepared from crosslinked cellulosic whiskers. Carbohydrate Polymers 75 (2009) 8589

te

366

17. L.Goetz, A. Mathew, K. Oksman, P. Gatenholm, P. Ragauskas. A novel nocomposite film

18. E. Kristo, C. G. Biliaderis. Physical properties of starch nanocrystal reinforced pullulan

films. Carbohydrate Polymers 68 (2007) 146158.

Ac
ce
p

365

363

19. S. A. Paralikar, J. Simonsen, J. Lombardi. Poly(vinyl alcohol)/cellulose nanocrystal barrier

membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 320 (2008) 248258.
20. O. van den Berg, M. Schroeter, J. R. Capadona, C. Weder. Nanocomposites based on

372

cellulose whiskers and (semi)conducting conjugated polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 17 (2007)

373

27462753

374
375

21. M. Labet, W. Thielemans, A. Dufresne. Polymer grafting onto starch nanocrystals.

Biomacromolecules, 8 (2007) 29162927.

Page 17 of 29

376

22. H. Angellier, S. Molina-Boisseau, L. Lebrun , A. Dufresne.. Processing and structural

377

properties of waxy maize starch nanocrystals reinforced natural rubber. Macromolecules 38

378

(2005) 37833792.

380

23. H. Angellier, S. Molina-Boisseau, A. Dufresne. Mechanical properties o waxy maize starch

ip
t

379

nanocrystal reinforced natural rubber. Macromolecules 38 (2005) 91619170.

24. N. Lin, J. Huang, P. R. Chang, D. P. Anderson, J. Yu. Preparation,Modification, and

382

Application of Starch Nanocrystals in Nanomaterials: A Review. J.Nano Mat.(2011)

383

doi:10.1155/2011/573687

us

25. A. Dufresne . Natural rubber green nanocomposites. In: Ranimol S, Thomas S, editors.

an

384

cr

381

Rubber Nanocomposites: Preparation, Properties, and Applications. Singapore: John

386

Wiley & Sons; 2010. p. 11345

te

26. A. Dufresne, J. Y. Cavaille. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym.Phys. (1998), 36, 2211-2224.

Ac
ce
p

387

385

Page 18 of 29

cr

Sample

Natural rubber latex

us

Composition of Potato starch nanocrystal/NR latex and nanocomposite films

an

Table 1

ip
t

Table(s)

(dry wt%)*
100

95

NR90

NR100

Starch
content
(dry wt%)

90

10

NR85

85

15

80

20

te

NR 80

NR95

Ac
ce
p

*Dryrubbercontentof100mgNRlatexfoundtobe60gm.

Page 19 of 29

ip
t

NR95

1.65

NR90

1.42

NR85

us

0.08

0.40

1.31

0.95

0.56

1.38

1.01

1.12

0.61

1.48

3.24

1.81

0.63

1.50

3.97

te

1.23

Ac
ce
p

NR80

0..38

1.35

NRfilm

Weightof
Diffusion
sampleat
coefficient
infinity(M)
(D)(cm2s1)
(gm)

an

Nanocomposites Thicknessof
Angleof
Samples sample (h)
linear ()
(vol%)
(mm)

cr

Table 2 :Water diffusion coefficient (D) of NR/nanocrystal composites.

Page 20 of 29

an

us

cr

ip
t

Figure(s)

te

Ac
ce
p

Figure1. Flow chart showing the preparation of potato starch nanocomposites

Page 21 of 29

cr

ip
t

an

us

starch nanocrystal

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Ac
ce
p

te

2 Theta

potato starch

Figure 2.X-ray diffraction patterns of starch nanocrystals and potato starch powder

Page 22 of 29

an

us

cr

ip
t

te

Figure 3.a)TEM micrograph of starch suspension b) Particle size distribution of (~50 counts)

Ac
ce
p

starch nanocrystals from the TEM data

Page 23 of 29

ip
t
cr
an

Figure 4. FESEM micrograph of a) NR95 b) NR90

te

Ac
ce
p

us

Page 24 of 29

ip
t
cr
us
an
M

te

Ac
ce
p

Figure 5 X-ray diffraction patterns of starch nanocrystals /NR nanocomposite films

Page 25 of 29

ip
t
cr
us
an

Figure-6. Stress- strain curves of starch nanocrystal /NR nanocomposites

te

Ac
ce
p

Page 26 of 29

ip
t
cr
us
an
M
d

te

Figure 7. (a) Tensile strength, (b), tensile modulus and (c) elongation at break,for starch

Ac
ce
p

nanocrystals/NRnanocomposite

Page 27 of 29

an

us

cr

ip
t

Figure 8. Schematic representation of possible nework formation of starch nanocrstyals in the

natural rubber matrix.

Ac
ce
p

te

Page 28 of 29

ip
t
cr
us
an
M
d
te
Ac
ce
p

Figure9.WateruptakeofNR/starchnanocrystalcomposites

388

Page 29 of 29