Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1(10)
Introduction
Loyalty demonstrates persons disposition to brand of goods (service), supermarket, category of goods,
a certain activity (Uncles, Dowling, Hammond, 1998). An enterprise seeks loyalty of investors, employees and
customers in order to consolidate its position in the market. There is a linkage between these participants of the
business (Reicheld, 1996). The growth of revenues and share of the market enables to attract potential
customers or customers of competitors. Referring to Donio, Massari, Passiante (2005), the growth of the
market share stimulates more rapid expansion of the enterprise and its competitive advantage. It makes
attracting of investors easier. A prosperous enterprise can offer personnel good pays for their job and create
conditions for their career. It helps to keep the best employees who affect the results of reducing costs,
improving quality, and increasing productivity. The higher productivity is one of the conditions to pay larger
salaries to the employees, to bankroll trainings or other programmes stimulating loyalty of employees.
Appreciated and well-paid employees better serve customers, strengthen relations with them eventually. Such
relations increase perceptible value of goods and (or) services to customers and positively affects their loyalty.
Customer loyalty leads to increased profitability, market share, and the growth (Naumann et al., 2001);
diminish costs of attracting new customers (Hoisington, Naumann, 2003), and is essential condition to
implement effective business strategy (Heskett, 2002).
Enterprises create loyalty programmes in order to develop loyalty and to reward. It is effective
marketing instrument helping to create such a situation where all interested sides win. Customer loyalty
programmes are more frequent. Loyalty programmes allow enterprises to understand their customers better as
well as to satisfy their needs and expectations (Nuttley, 2004). Customer loyalty programmes relate enterprise
and customers, initiate permanent dialogue between them, and increase satisfaction of customers (Loyalty
Marketing Workshop, 2005); also they are a source of different information about customers, they mitigate
potential shift of the best customers to competitors, and help to cooperate with partners and to keep terms with
competitors (Rotherham, 2004).
The studies of loyalty programmes got activated in Western countries in the last decade of the XX
century. Effect of loyalty programmes and factors of success were analyzed in fields of automobile, packer
goods, finance, airlines, retail, telecommunication services (Stauss, Schmidt, Schoeler, 2005). In Lithuania
there are not many scientific publications related with methodology of developing loyalty programmes, their
application advantages, and arising problems yet. We can pontifically assume that practice of developing
loyalty programmes is more advanced than theory. So it is necessary to find an answer to the question how
customer loyalty programme should be developing that it will be useful for both enterprise and customer.
The aim of the article is to analyse the mission of customer loyalty programme and particularities of
loyalty programmes development.
Object of the research is process of customer loyalty programme development.
Methods of the research are scientific literature analysis, comparative analysis, and content analysis of
loyalty programmes of Lithuanian service providers.
enterprise, its goods or services disappoint customer or suggestion of other enterprise is more valuable to
customer, the probability that customer will give preference to competitor of the enterprise will increase.
Discussions on different customer loyalty dimensions bringing influence on its management take place
in the scientific literature. The source of loyalty studies was a form of customer behaviour (Gremler, Brown,
1996). Hard-core loyalty is distinguished for devotion to the enterprise, repeated purchase probability, staying
with the current provider and recommendations for the enterprise to friends, colleagues, family members, etc.
(Lee, Lee and Feick, 2001).
By now some scientists accept such approach to loyalty. But scientists more often accent attitudinal
loyalty as other dimension of the loyalty now. According to Gremler and Brown (1996), customers loyal
attitude shows a conscious effort to evaluate competing brands, customers preferences and willingness to
purchase goods or services. Lee, Lee and Feick (2001) distinguish customers responsibility and preferences to
brand as the features of loyal attitude. Loyal behaviour and loyal attitude influence the enterprise in different
ways. Referring to Dick and Basu (1994), loyalty based on customer attitude could be more vulnerable when
loyalty is based on behaviour. According to them, it is necessary to estimate that behaviour and attitude are
changing over time, so loyalty is changing, too. Without above-mentioned dimensions of the behaviour and the
attitude, Yi-Ting Yu and Dean (2000) accent cognitive loyalty emphasizing complexity of the loyalty. Gembl
(2002) calls cognition-based or cognitive loyalty as rational because customer makes decisions recognizing the
processes in the enterprise, thinking, handling information, estimating the technology, etc. The scientist points
other important dimension of loyalty emotional loyalty. It is a result of customer feelings, expectations, and
interpersonal relationships with employees. Lee and Cunningham (2001) distinguish the importance of
expectations and experience, but Butcher, Sparks, OCallaghan (2001) distinguish the importance of customer
interpersonal relationships with employees. Interpersonal relationship and mutual trust determine social
comfort, greater attention, and sometimes growth into friendship. It becomes switching barriers to other
provider of goods or services.
What determines customer loyalty? Scientists often point customer satisfaction (Butscher, Sparks,
OCollaghan, Naumann, Jackson, Rosenbaum, 2001; Hoisington, Naumann, 2003). Lee, Lee, Feick (2001)
assume that different level of satisfaction matches up to different level of loyalty. The scientists classify
customers into four groups considering satisfaction and loyalty relation: loyalist/apostle (high satisfaction high loyalty), defector/terrorist (low satisfaction - low loyalty), mercenary (high satisfaction - low loyalty), and
hostage (low satisfaction - high loyalty). Bateson and Hoffman (2002) do not deny dependence between
customer satisfaction and loyalty. But they notice that low customer satisfaction (sometimes even
dissatisfaction) not always become the reason of making a break of relations with enterprise. It happens when
enterprise has a dominant position in the market; its brand of goods (services) is well-known, offering goods
(services) is a bit different, it is high switching costs to other provider, etc. Bell, Menguc (2002) think that
often satisfied customers are indifferent to enterprise because they purchase the same goods or services from
several possible enterprises. Referring to Mittal, Lassar (1998), lots of satisfied customers tend to change
provider of goods or services. So we cannot unambiguously assume that satisfied customer is loyal to
enterprise. In our opinion, the notice of Gamble, Stone, Woodcook (2002) that customer loyalty depends on
nature of goods or services is important.
Table 1 shows how interaction between enterprise and customer relates with possible risk of losing
customer and what loyalty strengthening means should be used seeking long-term relations with customers.
Table 1. Relation of interaction of customer and enterprise based on customer loyalty and
goods/service particularities (created by authors according to Gamble, Stone, Woodcook, 2002)
Interaction of customer
and enterprise based on
customer loyalty and
goods/service
particularities
Interaction based on
terminal contracts
Interaction based on
open-ended contracts
Interaction which
essence is relations of
customer and one
professional provider
Interaction based on
offering complex product
(goods and/or services)
Rare onetime interaction
Examples
Deposit account,
drivers civil
responsibility assurance
Cable television,
Internet connection
Services of tour
operators, financial
services
Services of jitney,
tollage
Service of
telecommunications
Services of haircut,
dentist, veterinarians
Purchase automobile,
expensive tours, service
of plastic surgery
2) to attract new customers. The enterprise can seek it in two different costly ways, namely: 1)
suggesting attractive privileges stimulating to become a participant of the loyalty programme, and 2) attracting
these who have heard good responses of participating in the loyalty programme. In our opinion, in the first
case the enterprise needs more effort and resources. When participants of loyalty programme advertise the
programme, it depends on how the enterprise reminds them about the loyalty programme and its objectives,
benefit for participants, how they value receivable benefit, etc.;
3) to create a database of customers. Without the database customer relationship management is
impossible. In the database not only demographical data of customers should be, but also information about
their behaviour should be stored, for example, preferences of consumption, acceptance of brands, periodicity
and quantity of purchase, the change of the brand, etc.
4) to provide maintenance to departments of the enterprise implementing functions of development and
research of goods (services). The data about customers help to communicate with them directly and to find out
difficulties of consumption, what attributes of goods (services) should be improved, to get ideas for creating
new goods (services). The obtained information of qualitative research does not reflect the opinion of all
consumers. But referring to Lovelock, Vandermerwe, Lewis (1996), consumers live word is essential in
preparing to comprehensive quantitative research of the market;
5) to provide possibilities to communicate between participants of the programme. It will help a seller,
service provider or agent, who initiates or controls the process of communication, to communicate with
customers regularly and directly.
As Fig. 1 shows, enterprise sets a lot of secondary tasks of loyalty programme and its solution leads to success
of the programme.
Secondary
tasks
To establish
additional means
to maintain
customers
Other tasks
Main tasks
To improve
an image of
goods/
enterprises
brand
To help to
agents
To develop
customer
loyalty
To establish
possibility of
communication
To attract new
customers
MISSION
To create
a data
basis
To provide a support
to other departments
of the enterprise
To maintain
relations with
community
To increase
consumption of
goods and
services
To solve
problems of
the enterprise
To increase visits
of customers
10
others as operational means (e.g., providing an e-mail address of customers, preparing answers to FAQs and
etc.).
Types of programme
Open or closed
Direct (financial privileges) or indirect
Loyalty programmes for end customers or for
intermediate customers
For example, in the company Sarma customer pays 5 Lt for making loyalty card and fills the form of the
participation in the loyalty programme. Open and closed programmes have their own advantages to both
enterprise, and customers. Open loyalty programme involves more participants, thus it comes over the margin
when programme begins buy off more quickly. In our opinion, also one significant advantage is that
enterprises have large database that helps to segment customers. The enterprise can offer special privileges to
the most useful customers in the frame of the closed loyalty programme. No input requiring joins the loyalty
11
programme affect attitudes of present customers positively. Besides, potential customer or customer of
competitors can be stimulated to join the programme when there are no barriers of joining the programme.
Closed loyalty programmes fits to small enterprises for its smaller programme costs because it is limited
number of participants and their input, easier determination priority privileges, more effective communication
with participants, etc. Closed programme comparing with the open one provides more advantages to
participants, for example, their self-esteem is bigger because everybody is not available to join the programme,
besides, the enterprise is constrained to improve privileges of loyalty programmes constantly because of the
fee for the membership. Referring to Butscher (2004), closed programmes more fit for enterprises having small
budget, having clearly defined customer segments and seeking to award the most significant consumers, while
open programmes are more acceptable for enterprises with larger budget and knowing their real and potential
customers well, distinguishing their good availability of goods/services.
(2004) distinguishes direct and indirect loyalty programmes. Direct programmes stimulate
customer financially. It can be different fixed and permanent discounts, rewards for purchasing goods and/or
services, etc. For example, stock company Lietuvos Telekomas gives customers some points for purchasing
services and they can purchase services with discounts or get prizes following the established rules.
Establishing of privileges is easier in the loyal programmes. The privileges of indirect programmes should be
considered thoroughly. At first, the customer should like to visit the enterprise and purchase services of the
enterprise, and the enterprise should combine pleasant service and unobtrusive offering of services. The
enterprise knowing its customer well can make offers the most valued by customer and stimulate to try new
goods and/or services of the enterprise.
Storing data and communication with participants of the programme. Loyalty cards are used as a mean
to get information about participants of the programme. Some of the cards are used to identify the participant;
others also perform the function of payment. Obtained information about target groups and profiles of
customers, behaviour of purchasing, scored points, etc. is stored in the database often named as a core of
loyalty programmes. How much and what kind of information about participants of the programme the
enterprise will get depends on variety of communicational forms: verbal or written, direct or remote. E-mails,
post, brochures, newsletters, hot-lines, etc. serve for this mission. The choice of communicational forms
depends on the level of communication. Referring to Butscher (2004), communication has three levels in the
frame of loyalty programme: participants of the programme communicate in the first level, in the second
workers and management of the enterprise, in the third partners of the programme. Frequent communication
with participants of the programme is important not only to guarantee continuity of participation but also to
maintain long-term relations with participants.
Privileges of loyalty programme established for customers. Variety of privileges or benefit should
stimulate desired behaviour of the programme participants (Wood, Felthouse and Bruce (2000). The consumer
will join the loyalty programme only in such case if obtainable benefit exceeds the input. Benefit is a whole of
financial and non-financial privileges the proper set of which is defined by researching values and priorities of
the customers (Fig. 2).
12
Discounts, prizes, gifts give financial benefit to customer; and special status, exclusive attitude,
additional services, etc. give non-financial benefit. Monetary value, matching requests and how easily
customer can get promised privileges determine the value of benefit.
The enterprise seeking to get attractive reward for loyalty should prepare a list of possible privileges,
and, according to the group researched, determine which privileges are interesting to loyalty programme
participants, and check if results of exploratory research match the interests of most customers.
According to scientists, establishing a set of privileges should not be attracted only by finance benefit.
Such programmes lose their competitiveness. Discounts as a reward should be used only if customer earns
them. Referring to Yi and Jeon (2003), financial privileges are more valuable if customer is highly involved.
Loyalty programme will be successful if obtainable benefit exceeds the input to loyalty programme. Offering
forms of loyalty programmes by several Lithuanian service providers are given in Table 3.
As Table 3 shows the largest part of loyalty programmes offered for customers are closed and the basis
of awarding privileges is concrete amount of points. In most of reviewed loyalty programmes amount of points
depends on the sum of payments for services or goods (except loyalty programme of Omnitel for the customers
who choose plans Kalbk, Draugai, Mano or Connect 50 privatiems and privileges depend on the time used for
services). Loyalty programmes privileges of two out of three reviewed retail networks (Norfos mamena and
Iki) are given according to the sum of payments not recounting them to points.
When analysing privileges rewarding customer loyalty, we determine that they are traditional: they offer
less expensive services and goods, exclusive suggestions that are related with discounts too, presenting gifts,
souvenirs, etc. In such context mobile operator Bit privileges of loyalty programme Bits tak klubas is
distinguished. Festivals are organized for second level golden customer of Bit; they get special service line of
very important person to them. In our opinion, Privileges of not only programmes organization but also its
partners help to develop customer loyalty successfully, for example, loyalty programmes participants of LAL
Gintarins mylios can rent a car of Hertz for a special price, get discount of 15 percent for services in hotels of
Holiday Inn Vilnius and restaurants of Vanagup, loyalty programmes participants of Norfos mamena get
discounts for fuel, service of car wash in network of filling-stations Neste A24 and Lukoil. Retail network Iki
offers special loyalty programme Iki premija senjorams to pensioners and invalids. So the biggest Lithuanian
enterprises of retail and services organize different level of loyalty programmes, which, in our opinion, are
popular and attain great attention of customers. But deeper pilot research is necessary that we can see if they
match the mission of such programmes.
Evaluation of loyalty programmes success. A success of the programme depends on its goals and level
of their implementation. Quantitative and qualitative indicators should be identified in order to diagnose the
success or failure (Butsher, 2004). The more important is the goal, the bigger necessity is to evaluate its
implementing. Referring to Benavent, Meyer-Waarden, Cri (2000), success of loyalty programmes is seldom
studied considering their popularity and high costs. According to the scientists, effectiveness of loyalty
programmes depends on two factors, namely: 1) right choosing of target group and 2) right choosing of
promotional means. Wansik and Seed (2001) assume that successful programme must evaluate the specificity
of goods and (or) services. It means that programme gives good results when it is created to develop loyalty of
such customers who devote fair amount of money for goods and (or) services during long time (for example,
fly by air-line, live in hotel frequently, etc.).
Usually such programmes are used seeking to maximize customers all lifetime value to enterprise.
Besides, loyalty programme is suitable for goods and (or) services which are not distinguished from others (for
example, service of filling-stations). It is the higher probability that loyalty programme will be successful if
customers are highly involved into process of service.
We can assume that the programme is successful if it helps to get as much as possible information about
customers (for example, about their purchasing and consumption habits, attitudes, emotions, etc.). The
information serves for the purpose that goods and (or) services will be adapted to specific needs of customers.
Scientists emphasize that prime information given by future participant of programme should be renewed
during all period of programme implementation.
13
Table 3. Summary of forms of loyalty programmes and privileges to end customers offered
by some of Lithuanian enterprises of goods and services
Enterprise
Tele 2
Activity
Nature of registration
Privileges
Lietuvos
Telekomas
Service of
fixed
telephone
connection
Biiuliai
Points
Omnitel
Service of
mobile
connection
Omnitel
extra
open
Points
period of
purchasing
services
points (pluses)
discounts
Points
Service of
mobile
connection
Service of
mobile
connection
Bit savas
Bits
tak
klubas
***
Maximum
VP
market
Retail trade of
food and
manufactured
products
Norfos
mamena
Retail trade of
food and
manufactured
products
Sarma
Retail trade of
perfumery
and cosmetic
Carriage of
passengers by
air transport
***
Retail trade of
food and
manufactured
products
Iki
udarbis
Lietuvos
avialinijos
Iki trade
network
Gintarins
mylios
Basis of giving
privileges
Points
discounts of
services and
telephone sets,
lower tariffs,
premiums
discounts of
services and
telephone sets,
lower tariffs,
bounties, free
services, gifts,
souvenirs,
festivals, free
service line of
VIP customers
discounts, prizes
from catalogue
according to
customers
chose
free services
Bit
Service of
mobile
connection
Programme
Partneris
points
sum of payments
for goods
number of miles,
depends on who
provides service:
LAL or its
partner; on fly
and class of fly
sum of payments
for goods marked
special sign
discounts in
Norfa network;
discounts of fuel
and services in
networks of
partners
discounts, gifts
LAL services
goods
Loyalty programmes require large budget and one of the traits of success is efficiency of costs. Wansik
and Seed (2001) point out that it can be counted as simple difference of gained profit and costs of
administration. In such a case costs, spent before beginning of loyalty programme to award for purchasing of
customers who do not explicit a wish to participate in the programme, would be not accounted. In spite of this,
14
such means withholds customers from switching to competitor. So Wansik and Seed (2001) suggest counting
efficiency of cost by the following a formula:
Benefit/damage = (PVpp- PVip) * Pu) B Ca,
Where:
PVpp selling a unit of goods/service after implementing a programme,
PVip selling a unit of goods/service before implementing a programme,
Pu price of unit, B budget intended for privileges, and
Ca programmes administrative costs.
Although a success of loyalty programme can be interpreted in different ways, we agree with Wansik
and Seed (2001) that the main criterion should be the fact if customers acknowledge importance and necessity
of loyalty programme. The programme cannot serve only for interests of enterprise. If enterprise, conversely
than it declares, pays more attention to realization of goods and (or) services, but not to reward for customer
loyalty, it cannot make long-term relations with customers. Thus one of the main goals will be not
implemented. In more and more growing competitive fight only loyal and long-termed customers become
important factor of competitive advance. Loyal customers not only purchase goods and services but also
promote their own enterprise; they are more tolerant to mistakes, master innovations more easily and more
quickly.
Creating a successful programme and its management is difficult but if it succeeds, enterprise masters
the most efficient instrument of marketing complex.
Conclusions
1. Loyalty shows the trust of customer in the enterprise, points to the benefit given for long-term
relationship with the enterprise. Loyalty can be as customer behaviour and attitude. Without these loyalty
dimensions, cognitive or rational and emotional loyalty exists as well. The right identification of form of
loyalty can determine the choice of a target group of loyalty programme and establishment of privileges.
Customer loyalty is like a result of satisfaction, but empirical researches have proved that it is not absolute
constant dependence. Interaction of enterprise and customer determined by particularities of goods (services)
affect customer loyalty more than satisfaction.
2. Loyalty programme is one of marketing instruments intended to develop customer loyalty and reward
for it. Customer loyalty programme is developed by determining its mission, goals and tasks. The mission of
loyalty programme strengthening the position of enterprise by increasing the market share, income and
profitability - is universal, but main goals and tasks depend on specificity of enterprises activity. Despite their
diversity, enterprises solve goals and tasks helping to improve processes of getting and storing information,
strengthening of brand, development of services by using organizational, communicational and composite
means.
3. Loyalty programmes are distinguished by great variety: according to a way of registration they can
be open or closed, according to nature of privileges they can be direct and indirect, according to target groups
they can be intended to intermediate and end customers. Results of pilot research show that most of the forms
of loyalty programmes exist in Lithuania. Creating of loyalty programme is sequence of interdependent steps
beginning by identification of a target group, determination of a structure implementing the programme, choice
of a way of participants registration and programmes type, decision how to get and store information about
customers, determination of a way of communication, establishment of privileges for award customer loyalty,
and ending by evaluation success of the programme.
REFERENCES
1. Apie "Gintarini myli" program [interactive]. [viewed 2005-09-20]. Access via Internet: http://www.lal.lt
2. Arantola H. (2002) Relationship privers in provider-consumer relationships. Empirical studies of customer loyalty
programs [interactive]. [viewed 2005-07-10]. Access via Internet: http://web2shh.fi
3. Beck, T. Want Loyal Customers? Dont Stop at Satisfaction: Customer relationship management // Customer
Inter@ction Solutions. February 2005. 36 -39 p.
4. Bell, S. J., Menguc, B. The employee-organization relationship, organizational citizenship behaviors, and superior
service quality // Journal of Retailing 2002, Volume 78, pp. 131-146.
5. Benavent, Meyer-Waarden, Cri (2000). Analysis of the efficiency of loyalty programs: a case study. [interactive].
[viewed 2005-07-15]. Access via Internet: http://www.univ-pau.fr
6. Hoffman, K. D., Bateson, J. E.G. Essentials of Services Marketing: Concepts, Strategies: and Cases. Harcourt, 2002.
15
7. , . . // :
, 2004. [interactive]. [viewed 2005-05-14]. Access via Internet: www.lc.rotor-it.com.
8. Brewer, G. The Customer Stops Here // Sales and Marketing Management. Mar 1998. p. 30-36.
9. Butscher, S. A. Loyalty is worth paying for // Kucher & Partners Strategy & Marketing Consultants, 2002.
[interactive]. [viewed 2005-05-14]. Access via Internet: http://www.marketingmix.de
10. Butcher, K., Sparks, B., OCallaghan Evaluate and relational influences on service loyalty // International Journal of
Service Industry Management. 2001, No.4, p.310 327
11. , . . : . , 2004. 272 .
12. Dick, A.S., Basu K. Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework // Journal of the Academy of
Marketing science. 1994, No.22, p.99 113.
13. Donio, J., Massari, P., Passiante, G. Links between satisfaction, loyalty and profitability in a company: An integrative
model for the agri-food sector // Proceedings Of The 11th International Conference On Industrial Engineering And
Engineering Management, Vols 1 And 2 - Industrial Engineering And Engineering Management In The Global
Economy : 1245-1250, 2005.
14. Gamble, P., Stone, M.,Woodcook, N. Marketing vzaimootnoenij s potrebiteliami / P. Gamble, M. Stone, N.
Woodcoock. Per. s angl. V. Jegorova. M.: FAIR-PRESS, 2002.
15. Graham, J. R. Ways, To Build Customer Loyalty // The American Salesman. Oct 1996. p. 18 40.
16. Gremler, D. D., Brown, S. W. (1996). Service Loyalty: Its Nature, Importance, and Implications. [interactive].
[viewed 2005-07-31]. Access via Internet: http://www.gremler.net
17. Heskett, J. L. Beyond customer loyalty//Managing Service Quality, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 355-357. [interactive].
[viewed 2005-05-14]. Access via Internet: http://www.emeraldinsight.com
18. Hoisington, S., Naumann, E. The loyalty elephant // Quality Progress. February 2003. 33-41 p.
19. Klient grups. [interactive]. [viewed 2005-07-14]. Access via Internet: http://www.bite.lt/pk/grupes/.
20. Lee, J., Lee, J., Feick, F. The impact of the switching costs on the customer satisfaction-loyalty link: mobile phone
service in France // Journal of services marketing. Vol. 15. No. 1. MCB University Press, 2001. 35-48 p.
21. Lee, M., Cunningham, L. F. A cost/benefit approach to uderstanding service loyalty // Journal of Services Marketing,
2001. [interactive]. [viewed 2001-12-17]. Access via Internet: http://antonio.emeraldinsight.com
22. Leenheer, J., Bijmolt, T. H. A., Van Heerde, H. J., Smidts, A. (2002). Do loyalty programs ehange behavioral
loyalty? An empirical anglysis accounting forr program design and competitive effects. [interactive]. [viewed 200507-07]. Access via Internet: http://arno.uvt.nl
23. Lojalumo kortel Sarma. [interactive]. [viewed 2005-07-14]. Access via Internet: http://www.sarma.lt
24. Lojalumo programa Biiuliai. [interactive]. [viewed 2005-07-14]. Access via Internet: http://www.telecom.lt
25. Loyalty Marketing Workshop // Templetion College, University of Oxford. June 2005. [interactive]. [viewed 200505-12]. Access via Internet: http://www.templeton.ox.ac.uk
26. Lovelock, Ch., Wright, L. Principles of Service Marketing and Management. Prentice Hall, 1999.
27. Loveloc, Ch., Vandermerwe, S., Lewis, B. Services marketing. A European perspective. Prentice Hall Europe, 1996.
28. Manish, M. (2001). Customer Loyalty Solutions. [interactive]. [viewed 2005-07-07]. Access via
Internet:http://www.brandchannel.com
29. Mittal, B., Lassar, W.M. Why do customers switch? The dynamics of satisfaction versus loyalty// Journal of Services
Marketing. 1998, Vol.12, No3, p.177
30. Naumann, E., Jackson, D.W., Rosenbaum, M. S. How to Implement a Customer Satisfaction Program. Business
Horizons. January-February 2001. 37-44 p.
31. Nuttley, M. Customer Loyalty Schemes // Digital Marketing. April 2004. [interactive]. [viewed 2005-05-14]. Access
via Internet: http://www.the-it-group.com
32. Reicheld, F. F. The quest for loyalty // Chemtech, 1996, 26 (12), 14-18. [intyeractive]. [viewed 2005-07-25]. Access
via Internet: http://pubs.acs.org
33. Rotherham, F. Buying loyalty // IDG Commnunications. April 2004. [interactive]. [viewed 2005-05-14]. Access via
Internet: http://www.unlimited.co.nz
34. Yu Yi-Ting, Dean, A. The contribution of emotional satisfaction to consumer loyalty//International Journal of Service
Industry Management.2001, No.3, p.234.
35. Yi, Y., Jeon, H. Effects of Loyalty Programs on Value Perception, program Loyalty, and Brand Loyalty/ Journal of
the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 229-240.
36. Wansik, B., Seed, S. Making Brand Loyalty Programs Succeed//Journal of Brand Management, February 2001.
[interactive]. [viewed 2005-07-31]. Access via Internet: http://www.consumerpsychology.net