Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2015
International Journal of Biosciences | IJB |
ISSN: 2220-6655 (Print), 2222-5234 (Online)
http://www.innspub.net
Vol. 6, No. 5, p. 70-78, 2015
RESEARCH PAPER
OPEN ACCESS
Department of Biology, Fars Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Fars, Iran
Iran
Key words: Apoptosis, Busulfan, Epididymal Sperm, Seminiferous tubule, Sperm viability.
http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/6.5.70-78
Abstract
At adequate concentrations busulfan selectively attacks the dividing spermatogonia and spermatocytes. But,
there is not enough information about side effects of low dose busulfan. The aim of this study was to assess
changes that occur on seminiferous tubules morphology and epididymal sperm of adult male mouse following
treatment with low dose busulfan. So, adult male NMRI mice (25-35 g) were assigned in three groups including;
Group 1: Control, Group 2; treated with busulfan for 21 days (0.06 mg/kg/day) and Group 3: treated with
busulfan for 21 days (0.8 mg/kg/day). The effects of busulfan on seminiferous tubules morphology and
epididymal sperm were evaluated by light microscopy, ComputerAided Sperm Analysis (CASA), MTT assay and
flowcytometry. The results showed that busulfan caused significant germinal epithelium destruction in treated
mice versus control. Also, busulfan had significant cytotoxic and apoptotic effects in epididymal sperm of treated
mice. The percentages of early apoptotic, late apoptotic and necrotic sperms in groups 2 and 3 demonstrated
significant increase versus control. Also, analysis of sperm parameters and sperm viability using CASA and MTT
assay demonstrated significant differences between control and busulfan treated mice. In conclusion,
chemotherapy with low dose busulfan causes significant changes on sperm viability, sperm parameters and
morphology of seminiferous tubules. All side effects of busulfan are dose dependent and they are considerable in
mice treated with 0.8 mg/kg busulfan. Hence, the treatment with low dose busulfan may reduce toxicity of
chemotherapy.
* Corresponding
70 Vahdati et al.
Int. J. Biosci.
2015
Introduction
Experimental animals
showed
long-term
effects
of
busulfan
on
Center
and
one week.
2009).
No. 86-23).
Treatment protocol
al., 2004).
2009).
spermatogenesis.
71 Vahdati et al.
Int. J. Biosci.
2015
removed.
formazan.
Sperm
also
have
Collection of sperm
addition of sperm.
dose busulfan.
depletion
Flowcytometry
and
with
sperm,
type
3)
germinal
measures
apoptosis
and
al., 2011).
V13242,
Invitrogen)
was
used
to
detect
the
mice.
72 Vahdati et al.
Int. J. Biosci.
2015
Results
within 5 min.
Statistical analysis
Sperm Count106
Normal Morphology%
Head Pathology%
Control
10.13 1.2 a
81.7 6.9 a
11.1
12.3
5.3
Group 2
7.3 0.61
68.9 7.1
22,7
13,6
16.1
Group 3
2.5 0.4
21.5 3.4
50.5
20.3
14.2
Different letters indicate significant differences between groups based one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05).
Microscopic observations of seminiferous tubule
demonstrated
diameter
significant
changes
on
germinal
of
seminiferous
tubule
decreased
Table 2. The percentages of early apoptotic, late apoptotic and necrotic sperm in control and busulfan treated
mice.
Groups
Necrotic Sperms %
Control
1.8 0.5 a
1.2 0.3 a
0.3 0.1 a
Group 2
11.8 0.9 b
8.2 1.5 b
2.1 0.5 b
Group 3
27.6 2 c
19.1 3.1 c
3.2 0.9 b
Different letters indicate significant differences between groups based one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05).
Sperm parameters
compared
73 Vahdati et al.
with
control
(Tab.
1).
Group
Int. J. Biosci.
2015
Fig. 1. Light microscopy images of seminiferous tubule in control and busulfan treated mice. A) Seminiferous
tubules with normal germinal epithelium. B) Slight decrease of germ cell population and normal lumen in group
2. C) Atrophy of seminiferous tubule with widening of lumen, depletion of germinal epithelium and massive germ
cell loss in group 3 (Arrows are showing germinal epithelium depletion).
FITC Annexin V/PI Assay; flowcytometry
The
results
illustrated
remarkable
differences
Discussion
Recent studies demonstrated that chemotherapy
manifested
spermatogenic
74 Vahdati et al.
by
reduced
cells
and
testicular
induces
volume,
permanently
Int. J. Biosci.
2015
2009).
at P< 0.05.
Different
letters
indicate
significant
differences
Bu: Busulfan.
chemotherapy.
75 Vahdati et al.
Int. J. Biosci.
2015
dose
busulfan
were
due
to
cytotoxicity
of
control.
Different
letters
indicate
significant
Fig. 6. The flowcytometric profile of epididymal sperm in control and busulfan treated mice that labeled with
Annexin V and PI. A) Necrotic cells labeled with PI but not with Annexin V-FITC. B) Late apoptotic cells with
significant green and red fluorescence. C) Nonfluorescent, fully viable cells. D) Early Apoptotic cells labeled with
Annexin V-FITC but not with PI.
necrotic sperm demonstrated significant changes
between control and busulfan treated mice. Different
letters indicate significant differences between groups
based one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05). Bu: Busulfan.
The results of sperm parameters, MTT assay and
flowcytometry revealed cytotoxic, genotoxic and
apoptotic effects of low dose busulfan on epididymal
sperm
Fig. 7. The flowcytometric results of epididymal
sperm in control and busulfan treated mice. The
percentages of early apoptotic, late apoptotic and
76 Vahdati et al.
of
busulfan
treated
mice.
But,
these
Int. J. Biosci.
2015
press. Section 1.
Acknowledgments
1062.
and
Research
Branch,
Islamic
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106002809402800911
Azad
References
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70480
biology 9, 331-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmg027
Bairanvand
of
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2004.08.034
KP.
permanent
2002.
SP.
2007.
Sperm
Cryopreserved
Bull
Assessment
Apoptosis
Semen
in
Fresh
Detected
by
and
Flow
engraftment
potential
of
murine
host
http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.2.354
921.
Blasiak
J,
Kowalik
J,
Malecka-Panas
conditioning
with
gamma
radiation
and
E,
safety
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)15206866(2000)20:
malignant
3<119
and
pharmacokinetics
disease
of
undergoing
administering
stem
cell
transplantation 8, 486-92.
Blasiak J, Kowalik J, Trzeciak A, Wojewodzka
M. 1999. Cytotoxicity and DNA damage and repair in
Chabner
BA.
Longo
DL.
2011.
77 Vahdati et al.
Cancer
Int. J. Biosci.
2015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.13497006.2004.tb03231.x
Nasimi P, Roohi S. 2012. Cell death in animal and
Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Toyokuni S, Morimoto
Temitope
http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.012575
AA,
Tolulope OA,
Funlola CT,
80, 1293-1304.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.073866
http://dx.doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.106.002428
Mohammad-Ghasemi
F,
Bahadori
MH,
for
Transplantation
of
Mouse
http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.110.089623
78 Vahdati et al.