Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Case 2:07-cv-08258-CAS-JCR

Document 9

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 1 of 2

1

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP MICHAEL H. PAGE - #154913

 

2

710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704

3

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188

4

 

Attorneys for Defendant

 

5

LYCOS, INC.

6

7

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

8

 

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

9

 

SANTA ANA DIVISION

 

10

11

 

MARK MISHAK, dba INEEDATV.COM,

Case No. CV07-8258 CAS (JCRx)

12

 

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT LYCOS, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

13

 

v.

14

GOOGLE, INC., AMERICAN ONLINE,

 

15

INC., NETSCAPE, INC., MICROSOFT NETWORK, INC., ASK JEEVES, INC.

Judge: The Honorable Christina A. Snyder

16

EXCITE, INC., WEBCRAWLER, INC., YAHOO, INC., CONVERSA, INC., LYCOS,

Date Comp. Filed:

December 20, 2007

17

INC., HOTBOT INC., ALTAVISTA INC., CRAIGSLIST INC., RESPOND INC.,

 

18

INFOSEEK INC., YELLOW PAGES INC., PLANETSEARCH INC., PRONET INC.,

19

NORTHERNLIGHT INC., LUCKYSURF INC., COMFIND INC., LIQUIDPRICE INC.,

20

EARTHLINK INC., DOES 1-100,

21

 

Defendants.

22

23

WHEREAS:

 

24

1.

Plaintiff Mark Mishak d/b/a INEEDATV.com (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on

25

December 20, 2007;

 

26

2.

Defendant Lycos’ responsive pleading is currently due, pursuant to this Court’s

27

Order, on February 19, 2008;

 

28

///

1

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT LYCOS, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE 411323.01 PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT CASE NO. CV07-8258 CAS (JCRx)

Case 2:07-cv-08258-CAS-JCR

Document 9

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 2 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. None of the other Defendants in this action have been served with the Complaint

in this action;

4. Plaintiff is currently considering whether to dismiss or amend his complaint, and

requires additional time to consult with counsel; and

5. In the event this action is not dismissed, the parties and Court will avoid

duplication of effort if there is a single, unified response date for all Defendants.

NOW THEREFORE,

Defendant Lycos, Inc., through its attorneys, and Plaintiff Mark Mishak, through his

attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond

to the Complaint shall be extended a further 30 days, up to and including March 20, 2008, and

request that this Court enter the accompanying proposed order to that effect.

Dated: February 14, 2008

Dated: February 14, 2008

By:

By:

2

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

/s/ Michael H. Page

MICHAEL H. PAGE Attorneys for Defendant LYCOS, INC.

LAW OFFICE OF ROGER JAMES AGAJANIAN

/s/ Roger James Agajanian

ROGER JAMES AGAJANIAN Attorneys for Plaintiff MARK MISHAK, dba INEEDATV.COM

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT LYCOS, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE 411323.01 PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT CASE NO. CV07-8258 CAS (JCRx)