Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
as
well
as
determining
acceleration
considering
gravity
experimentally. The concepts of motion that are interrelated to each other. For
instance, height matters when we are to find out its acceleration. As the height
increases, the acceleration also increases. It is because of the pull made by the
gravity to make the movement even quicker as its starting point is high enough to
make an object move on its own upon going down to a flat surface.
For Part A, secure the dynamics track and place the dynamics cart on top of
it. Attach the picket fence on to the cart. Next step is to place two photogates at
the 25cm and 65cm respectively. Adjust its height when necessary to refrain from
obstructing the passage of the cart with the attached picket fence. Secure the
proper connectors to be used to the two photogates and have it plugged into the
smart timer. Set the timer to Time: Two Gates. Press the third button of the smart
timer when the setup is ready. Note that the cart has to start from 0cm of the
Position
Photogate 2
of
Carts Displacement
Time
Average Speed
65cm
40cm
0.5081s
78.7247cm/s
75cm
50cm
0.6331s
78.9765cm/s
85cm
60cm
0.7888s
76.0649cm/s
95cm
70cm
0.9424s
74.2784cm/s
105cm
80cm
1.1118s
71.5564cm/s
dynamics track. Do record the results appeared on the smart timer. There are five
trials to be done and each trial needs to have the second photogate, which
originally measured at 65cm, adjusted to an additional 10cm in every succeeding
trial.
Position vs Time
1.2
1
0.8
Time(s) 0.6
0.4
0.2
0
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
) is inversely proportional to time because the faster it goes, the less time it
needs to get to the end point.
Height of
Track
Accelera
tion
(cm/s2)
Sin =
H/L
g=
a/sin
(cm/s2)
Time
1
2
3
4
5
5cm
7cm
9cm
11cm
13cm
40.2
56.5
76.6
94.3
110.7
0.0417
0.0583
0.0750
0.0917
0.1083
964.8
968.57
1021.33
1028.73
1021.85
2.23s
1.88s
1.62s
1.46s
1.34s
steps the moment we have already figured out what to do. Also, another point of
inaccuracy of results is the lack of precision. Perhaps, we may often neglect to
check, double-check, or triple-check if the photogates are aligned to the right
measurement. The presence of friction on the air track could possibly cause an
inaccuracy, since friction would always be present there and affects the movement
of the cart.
For Part B, same setup is to be used but with a couple of modifications. First
modification is the angled track. To obtain that, the dynamics track has to be
attached to the stand to which it measures 5cm as its initial height. In the same way,
the height of the photogates has to be adjusted prior to change of position of the
track to obtain precision of the motion. Photogate 1 is positioned at 80cm mark.
The setting to be used on the timer is Accel: One Gate. Again, five trials are to be
done. Each succeeding trial must have an additional height of 2cm.
From the data obtained, it can be concluded that the acceleration of an object
is directly proportional to the height of the track. When the height of the track is
getting higher, or making the inclination of the track steeper, the object accelerates
faster.
The
acceleration of the object is slower when the height of the track is also lower. From
the same set of data acquired, it can be established that the time the dynamics cart
spent going to the final position is inversely related to the inclination of the track.
As the track goes steeper, the time required for the cart to go down the track
becomes faster. It is because gravity exerts a larger force on the cart, as the angle
becomes steeper, which causes a greater acceleration, thus, making the time spent
shorter.
Lastly, Part C. First step is to position the photogate horizontally. Set the timer to
Accel: One Gate. When ready, please the third button. The picket fence has to be
dropped vertically, making sure that it has passed through the photobeam
perpendicularly.
Given the data above, the computed g for the last part is closer to the
actual gravitational
constant
maybe
because
it
does
not
deal
with
friction, only air resistance which may be negligible due to the structure of the
picket fence. The experimental values for g are a bit close from the actual value g
which is 980 cm/s2. The values are somewhat close to the actual value of the
acceleration due to gravity, with slight percent error. The slight percent error
maybe caused by human error or inaccuracy on the free falling of the picket fence.
After
the
experiment
we have
analyzed
that kinematics is
time. Velocity can change in three ways: (a) change in speed, (b) change in
direction, and (c) change in speed as well as direction. The experiment only
deals with motion in a straight line so the second and the third changes in
velocity are not part of
velocity as velocity is to position. The value of the height in which the value
of sin heavily relies on, increases along with the increasing value of
CONCLUSION
Therefore, from the data we gathered on this experiment, the effects of the
height of the track can greatly affect the acceleration of the cart. Base on the data
on the table, the higher the height of the track will have higher acceleration and
will lead to higher sin . From this, it implies that the higher the displacement of
the track will lead to the higher acceleration of the cart. The reason why the cart
will have higher acceleration to higher displacement it is because of the continues
gravitational pull to the cart without restriction to its track. Time and the
inclination of the track are interrelated to each other. As for the higher the
inclination of the track will lead to shorter time to takes the cart to goes down to
the track. The time will become shorter because as for the higher the inclination of
the track will also have higher acceleration which means the cart will become
faster and thats why it will takes shorter time to goes down to the track. The
difference between the picket fences acceleration and the value of g is the value of
the slope of a graph of average velocity versus time will be the acceleration due to
gravity of the falling object. And also the value of g is the computed value for the
free fall acceleration, while the picket fences acceleration is the value that
gathered by manual experimentation for the free fall acceleration, that is also why
the data on the g of table 2 and the data on table 3 have the similarities on the digits
or values.