Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • Tanada Vs Angara Digested

    Загружено:

    Robert Kane Reyes
    555 просмотров1 страница
    The petitioner contested the constitutionality of the Philippines joining the WTO, arguing it violated provisions of the constitution. The Supreme Court ruled that the principles in the constitution are not self-executing and cannot be the sole basis for causes of action. Furthermore, treaties like the WTO agreement that are consistent with international law and approved by the Senate become part of domestic law. Therefore, the court dismissed the petition for lack of merit.

    Исходное описание:

    Tanada vs Angara Digested

    Оригинальное название

    Tanada vs Angara Digested

    Авторское право

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Доступные форматы

    DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    The petitioner contested the constitutionality of the Philippines joining the WTO, arguing it violated provisions of the constitution. The Supreme Court ruled that the principles in the constitution are not self-executing and cannot be the sole basis for causes of action. Furthermore, treaties like the WTO agreement that are consistent with international law and approved by the Senate become part of domestic law. Therefore, the court dismissed the petition for lack of merit.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    555 просмотров1 страница

    Tanada Vs Angara Digested

    Загружено:

    Robert Kane Reyes
    The petitioner contested the constitutionality of the Philippines joining the WTO, arguing it violated provisions of the constitution. The Supreme Court ruled that the principles in the constitution are not self-executing and cannot be the sole basis for causes of action. Furthermore, treaties like the WTO agreement that are consistent with international law and approved by the Senate become part of domestic law. Therefore, the court dismissed the petition for lack of merit.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 1

    Tanada vs angara GR 118295

    Tanada vs angara
    GR 118295
    Facts: the instant case is a petition for certiorari,prohibition and
    mandamus filed bby petitioner to contest the constitutionality of
    joinuing the WTO which was concurred upon by majority of the
    Senate. Petioner contends that it is in conflict with the provisions
    of our constitution, specifically Art,11 sec 19, and art 12, sec 10.
    Issue: whether or not such affiliation is prohibited by our
    constitution
    Held: art 2 of the constitution, the principles stated herein are not
    self-executingg. They are used by the judiciary as aids or as
    guidelines in the exercise of its power of judicial review, and by
    the legislature in its enactments of laws. They are not sources for
    causes of action.
    Furthermore, the treaty is in harmony with the generally accepted
    principles of international law as part of the law of the land and
    the adherence of the amity with all nations. The deliberation and
    voting of the senate, voluntarily and overwhelmingly gave its
    consent to the WTO agreement, thereby making it a part of the
    law of the land.
    The petition is dismissed for lack of merit.

    Вам также может понравиться