Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ABSTRACT
This case study aims to describe how Engro Fertilizers Limited had lost its competitiveness,
under what situation Engro production went down, and the reasons behind the relative declined
sales of Engro Fertilizers Limited Company and the rapid decline of profits in its FY12. The
Agriculture industry is very much in demand, therefore, making a great importance of fertilizers
in Pakistan. The findings also revealed the marketing mix problems of Engro Fertilizers, more
specifically placement which is considered important factors by consumers.
INTRODUCTION
A.
B.
brand in Pakistan. The Company's financial and management strength is denoted by its
AA- rating by the Pakistan Credit Rating Agency.
C.
Introduction to Daharki
Daharki is a city of Ghotki District in the Sindh province of Pakistan. It is the capital
of Daharki Taluka - an administrative subdivision of the district. It is situate about
100 km from Sukkur, and between Mirpur Mathelo and Ubaro.
This is a small city like town in province of Sindh in Pakistan. Daharki is a business
centre with numerous industries particularly cotton factories, a fertilizer plant Engro
Fertilizer Ltd, oil and gas exploration companies Mari Gas Co. and Tullo Oil Pakistan
Ltd, Power Plants Star power co, Fauji Power Plant and Liberty power Plant.
Plant-B
Plant-B is made of Japan technology. It has the annual capacity of 802,000 tons per day.
Plant-C
Plant-C was made in 2010. It has the annual capacity of 1,300,000 tons per day.
INDUSTRY TREND
Fertilizer industry in Pakistan faced over a 2.7 million tons urea production loss in 2012
mainly due to gas curtailment. The industry could only produce 4.2 million tons of urea
having the maximum capacity of about 6.9 million tons per annum.
The sources from the interview told our group that during the last few years of fertilizer
industry, it has invested $2.3 billion, which is equal to approximately Rs. 230 arab, in
Pakistan based on the government approved agreement designed to encourage investment
in fertilizer sector. However, groundbreaking gas curtailment to fertilizer plants, in
violation of the government existing supply contract of 12 month a year, has caused
significant loss to the fertilizer industry and thus a big player of industry as well during
the year of 2012.
The interviewee also informed us that so far the industry has suffered a production loss of
over 2.7 million tons in 2012. The domestic fertilizer plants produced only 4.2 million
tons of urea against a total production capacity of over 6.9 million tons per annum.
This declination in domestic production of urea also has compelled the government to
import huge quantity of urea fertilizer to meet the farmers demand. The interviewee
further added because of this loss of production the government has imported over 1.23
million tons of urea therefore; the spending on this import is $566 million dollars and
also paid over Rs.24 billion rupees subsidy to keep the imported ureas prices same as
with locally produced urea.
On the contrary the person also added that the cash strapped Ministry of Finance is not
very happy over this situation. They are not happy because Pakistan has all the required
production facility to meet the domestic demand and even Pakistan can export over one
million ton of urea to earn hundreds of millions of dollars every year if domestic fertilizer
plants are provided with uninterrupted gas.
The countrys overall urea production capacity is about 6.9 million tons annually, as
against the demand of some 5.8 million tons. This extra production of Urea than demand,
if produced, can provide an opportunity to export some one million ton of urea annually.
The sources said that despite all the pressing problems, domestic urea price is still
Rs.1840 per bag that is below international urea price which is 2200, which is almost five
times larger than feed gas subsidy of Rs.400 per bag.
The current domestic urea price is Rs 1,840 per bag, including company price Rs 1,564
per bag and Rs.276 per bag General Sales Tax and advanced tax, as against average
international urea price of Rs 2,990 per bag inclusive of GST during 2012, we inquired.
The uplift of fertilizer industry by Pakistani government was actually meant to pass on
the benefit of domestic manufacturing to the farmer. This is evident from the fact that
during 2012 domestic urea sold at $311 per ton while it received gas at $3.8 per MMBTU
(Million Metric British Thermal Units). In comparison Middle Eastern producers sold
urea at $470 per ton while paying approximately $0.7 per MMBTU for gas.
They further said that over the last five years the farmers have received benefit of Rs 500
billion, of this Rs 140 billion was contributed by the government in form of feed gas
subsidy and Rs 360 billion was contributed by the fertilizer manufactures by keeping urea
prices significantly lower than the international prices.
The concerned person claimed that SNGPL-based plants are facing the worst crisis of
their history as such gas curtailment was never witnessed before 2012. He further added
that the fertilizer sector despite making a large investment of $2.3 billion in last 4-5 years
on new production capacity, which is making Pakistan worlds 7th largest urea
production country, is sitting on an idle urea capacity of over 2.5 million tons.
The person also claimed and curious about the gas curtailment and said that if the same
gas curtailment continues during 2013, the SNGPL-based fertilizer plants may force to
shut down permanently resulting in lay off of highly skilled manpower, increase in bad
debts and huge burden on national exchequer as well as increasing the number of
unemployed person in Pakistan, to import urea to meet the urea shortfall.
Concluding the industry trends, its not just fertilizer plants that would face the burnt, the
whole farmers community, as well as the government would be the ultimate losers and
the economy downfall if fertilizer plants with over 2 million tons of capacity were
shutdown due to unavailability of gas. The government needs to support fertilizer
industry to ensure inexpensive local urea to farmers and import fuel for the power sector
and the industry which is more cost effective.
35
30
25
20
Sales
15
Profits
10
0
2009
and
the
the
sudden
reasons
profit
2010
2011
2012
-5
Figure 1.1
THE SITUATION
Issue and Opportunity Identification
Engro Fertilizers Limited possesses a 24 year old fertilizers experience and possesses
1,769 employees. Three plants for fertilizers in Daharki can produce up to 2,275,000
per day, 975,000 from old Plants at Daharki and 1,300,000. The company is facing
few challenges because of Government back off from the agreement, fewer gas
reserves, inconsistent production of fertilizers, all together resulting in lower
production which leads to lower sales and finally lower profits. Customers demands
are not fulfilled due to the low production and consequently it gives space to the new
entrants and competitors to fill in the space and snatch the market share of Engro
Fertilizers. A manager at Engro Fertilizers claims, The biggest challenge for Engro
is to find the new the gas supply reserves. The company will have to figure out
strategies to overcome the challenges.
Problems
1. Declined Sales:
The sales of Engro fertilizers declined with a rate of approximately 3%.
2. Declined Profits:
The profits of Engro fertilizers declined with a rate of 164%, this shows a negative
profit or net loss.
4. Placement Issue:
In our interview, we come across another problem of Engro that is placement. The
interviewee told us that there are two phases of Short Supply and Long Supply. In
Short Supply demand of fertilizers is greater than the supply of fertilizers. In Long
Supply demand of fertilizers is less than the supply of fertilizers. In short supply
dealers have the chance to charge higher prices because of demand supply gap, but
Engro company push the dealers not to charge higher prices, on the contrary in long
supply when there is less demand and more supply then Engro push the dealers to
place Engro whether it is being sold or not. This doesnt create a win-win situation
and therefore the dealers dont want to help the company in its bad time, because
company doesnt allow them to charge higher prices when there is short supply. This
creates a problem for Engro in placement in long supply and also incurs cost of
warehousing the urea in long supply.
The terms of GSA were agreed upon prior to the bidding process and have not
been changed in any way since.
Later on, in April 2010 Pakistan started facing gas shortages which in result lead to
gas curtailment to the fertilizer industry. Due to low priority given to the fertilizer
sector in this gas deficit scenario, Engro Enven only received gas for 189 days in
2011 and 45 days in 2012 (Noted as Important). Engro Fertilizers suffered
severely with a combined margin loss of Rs.45 billion in 2011-12 and also
reported a pre-tax loss of Rs. 3.9 billion during 2012 and a after tax loss of Rs. 2.9
billion.
This agreement was a major reason and can be said as the root cause of all
problems, whether it is declined in sales, declined in profits, or hefty financial
charges.
Gas shortage in Pakistan became the reason for the breach in this agreement. It is
because of gas shortage that the production from the new plant was not as per to
expectation but it also affected the production of other two plants of Engro as well,
which became the reasons for low production and ultimately lower sales for FY12.
It is because of this agreement for which Engro went into the decision of setting up
the worlds largest urea train plant. This agreement leads to the financing of $1.1
billion. Therefore, Engro took long-term loan and equity financing, to finance the
worlds largest urea train plant, from creditors and investors and also took loan of
$30 million from World Bank, to help itself with an expansion plan that will
double production and create job opportunities.
After the acquired finances and successful completion of project, of new plant in
Daharki, the company was ready to touch new heights of production, sales, and
profits but it did not go as planned and they got stuck up with gas curtailment,
production losses, sales decline, and hefty charges.
Payment of loan was not possible in this state. Therefore, the company was forced
to approach its creditors to re-profile and re-schedule its long term obligations, as
the company was in danger of facing bankruptcy due to the gas curtailment. After
bearing this loss Engro fertilizers has filed a claim of Rs. 53.63 billion against Sui
Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) due to losses from gas curtailment, and
this claim increases by Rs2.5-3.0 billion for each month till gas is restored.
In October 2011, the Sindh High Court ordered the immediate restoration of gas to
Engro Fertilizers under the contract upholding the sovereign guarantee and the
GSA but this decision was not implemented.
In simple, because of the agreement of Gas supply, Engro and Government came
into an agreement of making a new plant at Daharki. In result, Engro took loan and
used its equity finances to finance this new project of new plant but because of gas
curtailment government was unable to fulfill its promise of providing the required
gas to run the new plant. This, in result, decrease the sales, rapidly decreased the
profits and it was about to put Engro in bankruptcy, but Engro rescheduled and reprofile its long term obligation by paying them Hefty Financial Charges-finance
charge is often an aggregated cost, including the cost of the carrying the debt itself
along with any related transaction fees.
PROPOSED SOLUTIONS
1. Identify the Alternatives
The primary purpose of any business, including Engro Fertilizers, is to meet the needs
of the customers with the companys product. Without a customer to sell to, the
business would not exist. As, Engro Fertilizers recently experienced a decline in the
sales due to various reasons mentioned above this ultimately has resulted in decreased
revenue and company profit. Therefore, the company should identify some other
alternatives in order to fulfill the demand, to produce the expected production of 2.27
million tons.
An alternative can be, as mentioned by the interviewee as well, to take the supply of
Gas from Guddu Gas reserves. Though the Gas supply in Guddu is low but Engro can
use power compressors to supply the gas to its Plant for urea production.
2. Evaluation of Alternatives
In order for Engro Fertilizers to succeed, the company must consider the risks and
challenges associated with the alternatives. When seeking the optimal solution in
form of an alternative, management must consider the challenges associated with the
alternative.
In the proposed solution, Engro must consider the risks and challenges associated
with the alternatives. In this situation, Engro must consider that whether they can use
that Gas reserves in Guddu to have its supply. Can the Gas reserves is sufficient to
supply the gas to its plants? And, will there be any problems face by this alternative?
The company should also provide some benefits to the dealers in Short supply in
order to overcome placement issue she is facing.
CONCLUSION
The case study research has proven that the there is decline in Sales and profits of the
company and it has badly influence the overall performance of Engro, which lead the
company to lose its competitiveness. It also has proven that the company is facing the
placement issue.
Therefore, Engro Fertilizer must focus on identifying the new supply of Gas by
spending on R&D and should provide win-win situation to overcome placement issue.