Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
0-under 5
6
6.98%
6
5-under 10
8
9.30%
14
10-under 15
17
19.77%
31
15-under 20
23
26.74%
54
20-under2 5
18
20.93%
72
25-under 30
10
11.63%
82
30-under 35
4
4.65%
86
86
Analysis
As per the relative Frequency the following are the Readings:1. The age group of 15- under 20 are the maximum attendants in the restraurant.
2. The culture and the ambiance of the restraurant is more appealing to the teenagers.
3. Its not a complete family resraurant as there is less attendants between the age group of 0
4. between the age group of 20- under 25 is the second highest as attendants in the restraura
5. Age group of 30- under 35 are the least attendants in the restraurant.
Recommendations
As per the above analysis following are the recommendations:1.The menu should be made more appealing for the family crowd to capture a better market
2. The ambiance should be made more suttle for the suitability of different class of crowds.
3. Include a flexible timings for happy hours to attract more crowd.
4. During festive season provide a special menu to the customers, this can lead to the attract
estraurant.
o the teenagers.
een the age group of 0 to 10
ndants in the restraurant.
Examples
The concept is used in many areas such as :1.Sales cumulated over a fiscal year.
2. Sports score during a contest.
3. Years of service.
4. Points earned in a course.
5. The costs of doing business over a period of time.
ase of sales.
Frequency p
Frequency
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
05
15
21
Class Inter
Analysis
1. The assembly time for components takes the maximum time in 38-40 with 34
2. The assembly time for components is highest in the middle stages.
3. Least amount of time is taken in 30-32 for the assembly of components wich is
4.Production Team has to be efficient during the middle stages of assembly of components fo
Hi
Frequency polygon
34
15
21
24
17
8
Frequency
Frequency
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Class Interval
-40 with 34
nents wich is 5.
embly of components for optimum utilization of resources as there is the maximum amount of tim
uency
Histogram
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Clas Interval
Histog
Frequency
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Cl
Analysis
1. In the evening shift the call flow is high and the calls are lasting for more than 50 mins on a
2.There are only few calls which is taking less than 20-30 mins.
3. As per the data evening shifts needs proper and effective staffing as the call flow is high an
4. The team leaders and trainers need to emphasise on the skills of the executive, how qickly
5. The call time on each call is high may be because there is a technical disturbance in their c
Comparison
1.Histogram and frequency polygon both show the graphical display of the class frequencies.
2. Frequency Polygon helps in understanding the steep rise between two class intervals.
Freque
Histogram
Frequency
Class Interval
as the call flow is high and the time taken on each call is very high.
the executive, how qickly can the call get over.
nical disturbance in their computers or with the softwares.
20
18
16
14
12
10 9
8
6
4
2
0
Cla
ency
Frequency Polygon
20
18
16
14
12
10 9
8
6
4
2
0
18
13
15
10
7
Class Interval
Frequency
Cumulative Frequenc
Ogive
Cumulative Frequency
60
50
40
30
20
10
0 2
45
50
28
17
7
Class Interval
Cumulative Frequency
Frequency
Firm
Caterpillar
Deere
Illionois Tools works
Eaton
American Standard
Revenue($ million)
30,251
19,986
11,731
9,817
9,509
81,294
Bar
Firm
American Standard
9,509
Eaton
9,817
11,7
Deere
Caterpillar
0
Revenue ($ m
Analysis
1. Pie Chart helps in understanding the revenue earned by the different industrial and farm eq
2. Caterpillar is holding the maximum market share compared to the other companies, follow
3. American Standard and Eaton have the least annual sales compared to the other companie
4.Illionois tools works Annual revenue is nearly 11% less than Deere. Hence it needs a better
Bar Chart
American Standard
9,509
Eaton
9,817
11,731
Deere
19,986
Caterpillar
0
Revenue($ million)
30,251
5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000
Revenue ($ miilion)
e($ million)
market share
million)
Airlines
Southwest Airlines
Delta Airlines
American Airlines
united Airlines
Northwest Airlines
US Airlines
Continental Airlines
Revenue(Million)
81.1
79.4
72.6
56.3
43.3
37.8
31.5
402
(Bar Grap
Continental Airlines
Airlines
31.5
US Airlines
37.8
Northwest Airlines
united Airlines
American Airlines
Delta Airlines
Southwest Airlines
0
10
20
30
40
Revenue (Million)
(Bar Graph)
al Airlines
Revenue
31.5
US Airlines
37.8
st Airlines
43.3
ed Airlines
Continenta
56.3
Revenue(Million)
an Airlines
72.6
ta Airlines
79.4
st Airlines
0
S
US Airlines; 9
Northwest Airlines
81.1
10
20
30
40
Revenue (Million)
50
60
70
80
90
united Airlines
America
Continental Airlines; 8%
Southwest Airlines; 20%
US Airlines; 9%
Northwest Airlines; 11%
Delta Airlines; 20%
united Airlines; 14%
American Airlines; 18%
Pharmaceutical Companies
Pfizer
Johnson & Johnson
Merck
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Abbott laboratories
Wyeth
Sales ($ Million)
52,921
47,348
22,939
21,886
20,473
17,358
182,925
Bar Graph
Pharmaceutical Companies
47,348
52,921
17,358
20,473
21,886
22,939
Sales ($ Million)
50,000
0
Sales ($ Million)
100,000
Sales ($ Million)
($ Million)
29%