Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
StatementofFriendsandSupporterstoChairmanSteveHouse
June25,2015
ChairmanSteveHouse
ColoradoRepublicanParty
DearChairmanHouse:
Thecontroversyswirlingaroundyouandyourleadershipofthepartyistakingatollon
thepartyshealth.Withthegreatpotentialandchallengesaheadofusfor2016,we
mustfindaleaderwhocanregaintheconfidenceofthestakeholdersofthepartyand
repairthedamageyouhavecaused.Werequestthatyoutenderyourresignation
immediatelyforthereasonslistedbelow.
Partyfinances
Trustisessentialfordonorslargeandsmall.Thefollowingjeopardizesthetrustneeded
forsuccessfulandsustainedfundraising.
Youclaimtohaveinheritedover$300,000indebt,butsupportinginformationis
requiredoncampaignfinancereportsanddoesnotappearthere.
Mayexpendituresexceededdonationsby$21,974.Maydonationsdecreased
$28,464fromAprilsdonations.
Thebudget,whichwasdueJune15,hasnotbeenprovidedtotheExecutive
Committeeasrequiredbythebylaws.Adraftwaspresentedtothematthelast
meeting.Requiredquarterlyfinancialstatementshavenotbeenprovidedtothe
CentralCommittee.
Youwereinformedinwritingthatthe$100,000lineofcreditwitha$60,000draw
haddisappearedfromtheFECreports,thattherewerenopaymentslistedand
thatamendedreportsneededtobefiled.However,youdidnotseethatthey
were.
ThemostrecentFECreportlists$10,000paidtoAmericanExpress.The
individualchargesmustbelistedas"memoentries."Nomemoentrieswere
reported.
Lackofconsistencyandclarityincommunication
Thestatepartymustbeclearandconsistentinitspublicpolicypositions.Thechair
mustbehaveprofessionallyandnotundermineelectedRepublicans.Weareawareof
manysuchinstancesonyourwatchtoomanytorepeathere.Examplesinclude:
Yougavemixed,confusing,andchangingstatementstolegislators,thegeneral
public,andthepressregardingapresidentialprimary.Thispubliclyembarrassed
Republicanlegislatorsandledtoascathing
DenverPost
oped.
AfteryourescindedyourintenttoresignonJune15,youissuedapressrelease
thatincluded:"IfIrefusedtomeettheirdemandtoresign,theythreatenedthat
falserumorsthatIhavebeenunfaithfultomywifewouldbemadepublic.The
ColoradoGOPissuedastatement,oneyoulaterparaphrased,thatsaid,These
falserumorsarecomingfromthesamepeoplewhocontinuallytrytobringdown
thepartyfortheirowngain,yearafteryear.Itisinconceivablethatastateparty
chairwouldrefertotheRepublicanAttorneyGeneralthatwayandattemptto
causeseveredamagetoherstellarreputation.
YourefusedtocallaspecialExecutiveCommitteemeetingforJune22,well
beforethisweekendwithallthenationalpressandattentionsurroundingthe
WCS.YoudidsoaftercommittingtoDouglasCountyChairJimPfaffthatyou
wouldandafterreceivingtherequisitesignatures.Defianceofthewishesofthe
membersrequestingaspecialmeetingisunacceptable.Theresulthasbeen
morediscordthanhadyoucalledthemeetingaspromised.Thoughthecallwas
late,youpossessedtheauthoritytowaivethedelay.
Wehaverecentlyheardthatyouclaimedtonationalmediathattherewasa
grievanceprocessthatshouldhavebeenutilized.Weareawareofnosuch
process.
Youhavemadecommitmentsbothforandagainstastrawpollthatwouldbind
Coloradosdelegation.Inemailyouhaveexpressedawillingnesstoholdcaucus
inFebruaryandreduceColoradosdelegationfrom34delegatesto9.
Donors,volunteers,appointees,andemployeeshavesharedmanyotherexamples.
Thesesamepeoplehaveexpressedfrustrationinyourrapidlychangingdirectionin
decisionsandcommunications,fromthemundanetoissuesofnationalsignificancelike
theprimarybill.Alossofconfidencehasensuedforthosewhoworkcloselywiththe
party.Thatlossofconfidencemustreverseundernewleadership.
Defamationofcharacterinyourofficialcapacity
Thestatepartychairmustbeabovegossipanddefamationofcharacter.Yetwehave
seenmanyinstancesincluding:
YoumadeirresponsiblefalseclaimsaboutTedHarveyspersonallifeand
financestomembersofthemediaandothersinthecontextofyourofficial
2
reasonsfornotofferingHarveyemployment.Youfabricatedandpromotedthe
notionthatHarveyspersonalcircumstancescouldleadhimtoembezzlefromthe
party.Noneofyourstatementsaretrue.
Youfalselyassertedanotherstatepartyofficerwouldberesigningsoonbecause
ofpersonalfinancialstressandallegedpendingbankruptcy.Spreadingsuch
informationaboutanotherpartyofficerisinexcusable.
Afterthemeetingwithyourformerkeysupporters,youcommunicatedto9News
thatnocriminalchargeswouldlikelybefiled.Thisincorrectlyimpliedthat
Coffman,Tancredo,andMizelhadbeeninvolvedinillegalacts.Yourthemesof
blackmailandextortionwerepickedupwidelyinthepresscausingunnecessary
harmtothepartyandrespectedmembers.Now,aformalrequestfor
investigationagainstthethreehasbeenmadewiththeDenverDistrictAttorney
asaresultofyourstatementsandactions.
ThroughColoradoGOPspokesmanOwenLoftus,youcommunicatedthat
attorneysforthepartyhadcontactedtheUSAttorneysofficeand,accordingto
KUSA9News,theDenverDistrictAttorney.Thispublicannouncementgavethe
impressionthatthereismerittothecriminalchargesyouhavebeenpromoting.
Atthattime,theDenverDistrictAttorneycategoricallydeniedthattheywere
contactedandtheU.S.AttorneysOfficehasstatedtheyarenotinvolvedinany
aspectofthis.Thiswasanattempttodefamethroughinnuendo.Youusedof
partyfundsandresourcestofurtheryourpersonalagendaandcausedsignificant
damagewithintheparty.
YoutoldmanypeoplethatbothTedHarveyandKimHerzfeldtthreatenedthe
AttorneyGeneral.AfriendcontactedtheAttorneyGeneralandwastoldthatwas
false.
Inalloftheseinstancesandothers,yourbehaviorexposesthepartytosubstantial
legalliability.Additionally,thestatepartycannottoleratethechairmanengagingin
characterdefamationofanypersonorusingpartyresourcesforapersonalagenda.
Personnel
NoonewishestosecondguessthehiringofTylerHartortheretentionofShanaKohn.
However,significantconcernshavebeenraisedbyyourhandlingofemployment
discussionswithotherindividuals.
YoupromisedTedHarveytheExecutiveDirectorsjobinfrontofothers.Almost
immediatelyafteryourelectionwhenthisdecisionwasquestioned,youposted
onFacebookthatnoonehadbeenpromisedajob.
YoucontinuedtostringTedHarveyalongwithpromisesoftheExecutive
Directorsjobatalaterdate.
YoumischaracterizedthepositionoftheAttorneyGeneraltoexplainwhyyou
rescindedthejoboffertoTedHarvey.Whencalledonit,youresortedto
defamingHarvey.
YoualsohaverepresentedthatonJune15,Tancredo,Coffman,andMizel
demandedyouhireHarveyonthestatepartystaff.Thisisuntruethediscussion
ofHarveyconcernedtheslanderousstatementsyoumadeabouthim.
Youtoldatleast3membersofthetransitionteam,whoexpectedtobepaid,that
nopaywouldbeforthcomingbecauseoftheseriousnatureofthepartysdebt.
Youthenpaid2ofthe3.Notonlydidyoupay2ofthe3,butthiscontractlabor
wasnotdisclosedtotheExecutiveCommitteenordisclosedinthebudget.
Becauseofyourconflictingcommunications,thereisconfusionaboutwhoison
thestatepartypayroll,whomayhaveasidedeal,andwhomayspeakforthe
party.
Inalloftheaboveinstancesandothers,suchbehaviorexposesthepartytosubstantial
legalliability.Additionally,thepartycannottoleratethechairmanengagingincharacter
defamationofanyperson,particularlyinthecontextofemploymentdenial.
Untruthfulstatementsconcerningyourextramaritalaffairandunethicalreaction
toexposure
Everyonehasarighttoprivacyintheirpersonallife.Youmadeyourextramaritalliaison
withaColoradoSpringswomanthefodderforunseemlygossipandpublicscrutiny,
nowimplicatingthereputationoftheparty.Yourfalseandproactivedenialsoftheaffair
tothepressescalatedyourprivateunprofessionalandduplicitousbehaviortoapublic
levelandcreatedanunnecessaryspecterofscandalmarringthepartysreputation.
Yourinvolvementintheaffairhasnotbeendiscreetorseparatefromparty
business.Theaffairwasknowninwideenoughcirclestogenerateinquiriesand
investigationsfromthepress,includingatpoliticaleventswhereyouwere
representingtheparty.
Youdeniedanaffairwhichisunquestionablytrueandthesourceofdistractions
inyourofficialcapacity.
4
Weunderstandthatatyourdirection,AdamsCountyViceChairJohnSampson
contactedthewomaninvolved.Shefollowedyourdemandthatshedenythe
affaironanaudiorecordingMr.Sampsonmade.Whenthechairmanengagesin
thislevelofduplicitousandunethicalbehavior,suchtacticsescalatethescandal
andincreasedamagetothepartysreputation.Itisimpossibletoseparateyour
privateactionsasanindividualandtheactionsyouweretakingtopurportedly
protectyourofficialposition.
Ongoingindiscretionsandliesaboutthoseindiscretionscanonlyresultinfurtherinjury
totheparty.Werefusetoknowinglyallowsuchindiscreetbehaviortobecome
ammunitionforouropponentsinthe2016elections.
Summary
Whilewecouldlistmanyadditionalseriouslydamagingexamplesandcomplaintsfrom
volunteersanddonors,theaboveexamplesalonearemorethanenoughtohave
shatteredourconfidenceinyourabilitytoleadthispartyincrucialyears.Thepartys
goalscannotbemetifourmembers,theCentralCommittee,theExecutiveCommittee,
andColoradovotershavelostconfidenceinourchairman.Wethereforeaskforyour
immediateresignation.Wewishtoavoidtheprocesstoinvoluntarilyremoveyoufrom
office,butwewillpursuethatifneeded.
Weregretthenecessitytotakethisaction.
Name
/s/ElaineBrofford
County
Denver
Title
PCP,DenverCountyvicechair,past
presidentDenverRepublicanWomen
cc:ExecComm
CountyChairs
ReincePriebus
image: http://3ynk0w1orym5czc542xmo55k.wpengine.netdnacdn.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/07/11403419_10153089859846848_651263486963
9185774_n.jpg
they threatened that a potential lawsuit may be filed and that false rumors
that I have been unfaithful to my wife would be made public. A woman
came forward shortly thereafter confessing to an adulterous relationship
with House.
At the partys June executive committee meeting less than two weeks
later, House backtracked his accusation of blackmail and instead said that
the trio were only giving him constructive criticism.
Prior to their vote of confidence, the executive committee held a vote to
not allow a secret ballot on Houses ability to lead the party. Inside
sources state that the committee voted 11-8 to hold an open vote
suggesting that if votes had been cast by secret ballot, they would have
reflected a more divided committee.
While the vote by the committee put on a public display of party unity,
Republicans in private conversations continue to ask questions indicating
a deep division. Do executive committee members really believe that
integrity doesnt matter? Or were they bamboozled by psychological
warfare style tactics in the boardroom?
Inside sources shared what appeared to be strategic maneuvers to
intimidate and wear down committee members. These are the conditions
the executive committee members set for the meeting:
No lunch break was scheduled.
No food or beverage was provided in the meeting which lasted more
than six hours.
Rather than making a motion to adjourn to a more conducive nearby
location given the temperature, committee members accepted the
brutal meeting conditions in a room with broken air conditioning.
No fans or cooling devices were brought into the meeting room. No cold
water was offered.
Committee members met without scheduled breaks to grab a drink from
the water fountain, use the restroom, or seek refuge in the outside
air. Any member who left the room risked missing important
information or the opportunity to vote on matters before the
committee.
In addition to the physical environmental challenges, an atmosphere of
intimidation may have also influenced the outcome:
One member of the committee reprimanded Mizel for attempting to
distribute a document outlining grievances of party members.
The committee decided not to review Mizels document that detailed
alleged poor decision making, a destructive management style, and
dishonest behavior.
A long debate occurred in which some committee members attempted
She was told the air conditioning was out because of a lightning strike the
previous day. Executive committee members went in and out periodically
to use the restroom or get a drink.
It was sometime between 12:30 and 1:00 when people waiting in the
hallway were told they could come into the meeting room. Committee
members did not take a lunch break, but proceeded to discuss whether
the next phase of the meeting concerning the party chairmans leadership
would be held in an open session. After ten minutes, the committee voted
to again close its session.
Inside sources said that as people waited in the hallway in the afternoon,
the executive committee debated for almost two hours how the rest of the
meeting would be managed and whether Coffman should be allowed to
speak at all. One source stated that if not for Vice Chair Derrick Wilburn
speaking up in favor of allowing Coffman to speak, the attorney general
would have been denied the opportunity to address the committee.
The executive committee gave no notice as to who would be asked to
present information, when they would be called into the meeting, and how
long they would be given to address the committee. Coffman was not
given any indication of a time frame in which she would address the
group. She was called into the meeting at approximately 2:30after four
hours of waiting.
The committee limited Coffmans comments, halting her from presenting
her prepared remarks in their entirety. I was given five minutes to speak
and five minutes for questions, Coffman said. She confirmed that
Arapahoe County Chair Joy Hoffman acted as the meeting chair and laid
out the ground rules to her. Coffman shared that the executive committee
was interested only in what happened during the June 15th meetingand
nothing else.
I galloped through my prepared chronology of events but was not able to
finish in five minutes. I felt I had to leave out significant facts, Coffman
said.
In addition to the attempt to prevent the attorney general from speaking,
the committee was successful in stymying former US Congressman Tom
Tancredo and Pueblo County Chair Becky Mizel. When the group was
ready to call Tancredo, he was outside the building seeking refuge from
the sweat filled hallway. Sources state that Hoffman refused to allow
Tancredo to be called into the meeting by phone or text. Mizel was also
denied from distributing a statement of grievances to the committee,
outlining concerns she and others shared about Houses ability to
effectively lead the party.
Tancredo said that the meeting appeared to lack organization from the
Subject: FW:
Pueblo
GOP--Why
Steve
House
cannot
succeed
as
Chair
in
2016
Date: Tuesday,
August
11,
2015
at
8:08:15
PM
Mountain
Daylight
Time
From:
Marilyn Marks
This is recent information and my perspective offered for your meeting tonight.
Please pass along to other interested Pueblo GOP members.
After the three leaders met privately with House to cover a wide variety of
concerns, also bringing up his affair (that was beginning to draw the attention of
the press and donors), House showed his complete lack of ethics. House accused
the three of criminal actions amounting to extortion and blackmail. He used
high-priced party attorneys with high level connections into the US Attorneys
ofce to seek retribution on behalf of the party in the form of felony
prosecution of the three for crimes that he now admits were not committed. He
engaged another party ofcer to secretly record his mistress obeying Houses
instructions to deny the affair. Phone records show House called and texted her
many times after the Coffman meeting and before the denial recording was
completed.
Apparently in order to further intimidate the three leaders, the party falsely
claimed that it had also contacted the Denver DA to seek an investigation of the
three for criminal behavior, and the Denver DAs ofce was quick to refute that
lie by the party spokesman. Liberal activist group ProgressNow then led a
complaint to seek investigation and prosecution.
The false allegations have resulted in dozens of news stories damaging to
Coffman, the highest Republican vote-getter in the state, and had a major role in
contributing to Becky Mizels resignation as Pueblo County Chair. Houses
irresponsible and reckless actions have already had serious negative impacts on
the party, yet the Executive Committee supported his actions in what the press
repeatedly called a blackmail scandal, They did not repudiate the state partys
actions in contacting prosecutors.
After receiving the support of the Executive Committee meeting June 26, House
quietly walked back his allegation and said that he had never felt that there was a
blackmail attempt. Yet House and the Executive Committee have offered no
apologies, no attempt to help clear the three leaders names, or shown the
slightest concern for the damage they did. Did House have the party attorneys
formally retract the false allegations to prosecutors, or does the US Attorneys
ofce still consider this a standing allegation of felonies?
How can members of the party support Houses behavior or actions of the
ExComm in approval of actions that purposely damage its respected leaders?
How can his illegal act of fabricating crimes be essentially ratied by the
Executive Committee?
House has shown this to be his pattern of behavior. He fabricated damaging lies
Page
2
of
4
to defame former Senator Ted Harvey, when House chose to break his
commitment to hire Harvey as the partys Executive Director. After having
Harvey work without pay for weeks at the party headquarters, House reneged on
the commitment to a employment contract, and then House excused his change
of heart by falsely claiming that Harvey was an embezzlement risk because of
his imaginary pending bankruptcy and divorce. House even taken such claims to
the media. (None of these claims are true, but are ctitious excuses for Houses
reneging on the agreement with Harvey.)
House had simultaneously and egregiously fabricated rumors that Vice-Chair
Derrick Wilburn would soon resign because of pending personal bankruptcy.
(Again false claims invented out of thin air.)
It is clear that anyone who may be a threat to Houses continuing circle of lies is
at risk of drawing deceitful claims intended to discredit and damage them.
Although the party Executive Committee was informed of these incidences, they
stated their strong support for Houses management of the party.
What should a 2016 candidate expect from House? Particularly one in a primary
where House may like their opponent? Will an disfavored candidate be
subjected to defamation by his own party chair, the way the House defamed,
Harvey, Willburn, Coffman, Tancredo and Mizel?
Deceiving the Donors
He claims that no standard accounting practices are required for keeping the
party books, despite the bank loan that requires them. House writes in emails
that the accounting system is broken, and that material adjustments will be
made to the nancials after we get through the August Executive Committee
meeting. (Go to Facebook page Colorado GOP Watchfor documentation of
correspondence.)
In short, the nancial reporting sounds woefully improper and decient, and the
ExComm and donors have little idea of the nancial condition or activities of the
party. Required audits have not been completed. House promised thorough
audits during his campaign and shortly after he was elected, but decided not to
have them conducted. House ran on a platform of nancial transparency and
accountability, but has shown nothing but disdain for nancial reporting
requirements and inquiries from members.
Either of the two areas of concern above are enough to force the resignation of
most organizations leaders, but the State Republican Party appears to have
lower standards than most. A perusal of some of the other major concerns that
were rejected by the Executive Committee from their review should also raise
serious concerns about Steve Houses tness for leading the party.
Pueblo members, please ask House for his explanations tonight.
Marilyn Marks
Page 4 of 4