Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(YNA
ADVISORY GROUP FOR AEROSPACE RESEARCH &DEVELOPMENT
7 RUE ANCELLE. 92200 NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE, FRANCE
-.
thi. ;Mtat0Iil
V-4-Ii %\.1'
fprd.1 A~thl
\l-
~~~it
i
ts
%hu
C ttL
iL
i i, %InAl
tut
+North
I
BestAvaiableCop
O~0gantsah'on du V4106e
018 'AflanthQue Nor'd
Bv
-.
-Recommenetding
linprovitig theco-opecration amiong inenitter tttiiins iii aerospace research and devcliipimetit
lsxchaiige
tit sIcintific andtechnical Intforktitioit:
P'rovidiiig issitatce ii, itettiher itatilins lt ili purftose otit. etcainig
their scictitilic widstecinw itsiIviteniil.
Rentideting swieifitii And ehticinl ASs~istniC,
a., retlut:%ted.
tot other NAl() bothes and It, utienier sttionis In
aernospAis
field
tionne.Ltion with rcsearch and deveclopsunto Ipitlein it iiis
Itic h~ghcst
authiris withtini A(Alfl
a. niesvisi
I, b invsitation stilv andsilI our~itallv
lninied to oiusiens tit the NA~l) nationm
111i%Viltelltit 111l
thus 11i1t,411
a11s1
hA%
beenirepaiti.used
dirc,11) tnv~ninsuietiatsiqplied t1, ACiAIII sit 0wthe
talisi
PNtsilusue
%cwternivir 1`04
ofspsiight 0~ AGARDiIQ
Atl Kights liescised
~thd C
Pnuiu'
M
44 Nhsitsniran
Mkuttmurn
fasa
P(Wrmq
Maist l111igmitAWi'.
Cimss
KAi (AV
r)s
isS
copy
--
t
-I
Preface
With the rapid development and introduction (if new technologies in moderm aircraft design and structures, such as po~wered
lifting systems with blown flaps or deflected jets, supersonic configurations with their well-known problematic thennoacoustical phenm~mena. the promising advances in the field of nonmetallic materials (CF-RP. ceramics), there is atstrong teed
to concentrate onl the wide band of "new structural fatigue problems" resulting therefrom andi to ascertain %tate-of-the-an
expertise in the fatigue area.
Meeting c(intributions focus onl topics dealing with the acoustic environment Inl Sub-. supcr. and hyper-sonic flow regimecs,
iiinovatiive structural design techniques and materials allowing the layout of fatigue resistant structures as well as with
ciipitrimcntial and analytical tools for evaluation of the bethaviour of structures Iin anl acoustically and thermally adverse
ensironinent.
Ani additioinal session of the Meeting isdedicated to topics retatod itothe field oftstructural -acoustics. 'Thereby atbroad band oti
dlt erent acti sitics is addressed. e~g the prediction of noise Iin closed compartments, the identificationi of strsictural-bonie
lise~ paths as well atsthe acoustic diagnosis ofl aircraft disasters.
Prof ace
Aske, Iv' dvelt'p;imneitl ci Ia inise en .ippl1'AIt"
atas faph-s
ii
s iouvetrstchnlge rbout !,t koiscpitioii ci les strnItars' dcs
AeiOllets unodekirnes. 1010les i Iue %e
svI~ncs hvpcIsustentaicuvs A volcis stiulfloo ou a IV' a looi-sec oicrieitable, les
uti gutifitoifiln
ttuvFersi
mique% isec% leaf ptihe~no iesiieiiocosiqe prof~cilentiqui;s hsicn konnu%. ci Ic%pritt-ie
ptilowitculs feall
J~anisIc Jkmon
niamede itnAtertaulk win in.~uallititis if FIK", .ucrinqucs)
ili~teitnuinotatil t,heeci oni utref
sait IV syste tics lArge dk
nm'nVeaus pal'l1ine. tke Ia ftauiUC strucmMrAIC41uiCHn
1611lteni C ti Ih
aIre IV lKiift tic I Vtmtde
t'art dc l'CspetMI1 dans, IVdrinlaine de Ia1fatigue'
IV ko~'nirtiutuons, i Ia teumuon coomusenuef
ite partuc
ulier IV, question relaiis'e it I'enivuronoeurueit Acou'iuque: en1legi tie
sl'IsrUtineni Usoiue
supfsomubfitlue cl livivfsoiiique. les tcshtiufues am
MIItu'au%unarWdUIAu
thecon
COCP11
%iousru.iXUrAl
1iitfilvatcur% peCfilurital Ia ionkcrulon dr siruciurc%res13istan
ie Ia fatigue1.4iiA lue
iliic c AMls cxp&ItnntaIle. ci .iuk,2%iqsues A
1'evAlualtuo uilvounlxuIclueuuu dc% %ttrltusitii shauiunlenerft'luienWHu aiutqet
uCt thrutniuvuctinet hos~t
i
Vtoe se-lon sv%1~nuiar cit cusasee sertaunc% quesition rclatives no dshounauru
sc l'Acousttuufuetiliuttotilc Air. sine
dan. Ic'.sltlel %1,cle. I' sL'nitifiatur rI thevaici% dii
ImageVg4niine I'A.iviuvt, Cst C-4auuune. cimtfe auntcs IAprtshkison In Nrul i~tt
biuit Aseinmc parw
liac sIirus-tuirs, he slagiv ..
tIwacoustitloe mis c~atastrophes 30rmentie ci h1'. avansees via%'
Ic dimh'raute du
%conItrue ;will Ju bmuit
Sub Comninitte
(Ihaurnuan
Mir. R. LahourdLle
1)ireoctur Scientifique des
Stntcture%
ONEIRA
29 Av.. de la D~iv.L.eclerc
92'322 (hiltillon ('edex
F~rantce
Deputy Chairman:
D~r.0) Senshurg
Chief E~ngineer
IDuitsche Ae~rospace AG
Nilitaerflultzeuge
I'osttach 80 11I60
81661 Mitinich
GermnanY
SUB-COMNIfl1'1'E NIENIBERS
C'hairm~an:
Nllnhrmbm:
1). (hatititctt
I ( hesta
%t ( ohillogi
II lotsittig
A R I uiItim)h
R 1*A urdetie
It il OtC1
DI) Aul
11 I'vr~ictrI
C I'eit'llC
I-R
HI
1k
(ill,
UK
lIR
%,gg
14'
IS
R Potter
I Sandii,
N Saiitknw.k
0) Sciishorg
I) 1 Sit1popsl
1 I' Wjtter%(4
R /Witl
PANEL. FEcr1IVE
Itt J...
e SI (AHIAI I Al .Spait
Mail from US and Canada:
l'rtti USA ansI(audat
A;ARI) NA l VNNII'1
IS(* le6
APOCAl: OIPI?
00lia.3
1.
S~94
.1.0
.I
Ii
h
I'.
('K
SI1
NC
(41
CA
CK
Ni-
Contents
Page
Preface/Priface
iii
iv
by IT. Kacprzynski
SESSION I: OVERVIEW
by P.D. (irecn
by j Prar'un
9A
1'.
Ajlkltll~
1 1
10
II
12
13
by K. KOnig
14
15
16
by D, "logard
17
IN
19
20
21
Paper 22 Aithdrawn
Advanced Stallikal Ener&%Anah)-s
by K It lietic
Identification and At,.;llf of Air. and Structurv-borne Nnwe and Vibratioln Path%
bv II Van dcr Auvtcricr. K WVLkart. 11Vmadicr Lindnci and l) O(le
1
24
Paper 25 Aithdrain
Spectrogram I)iagnoii (of Aircraft Diiiaters
by I; W iluigriland
26
T-I
(Ref. 1).
The data sheets coverin" the above
topics were Issued in 1972 as AGARDograph
162 Part I and i1(Ref. 291 and as ESDU Data
Sheets. A symposium on Acoustic Fatigue
was held during the 35th SMP Meeting, in
Toulouse. France in September 1972 (Ref. 301.
Since that tine the acoustic aircraft
loads became more severe and the developed
in the sixties and seventies methods for
solution of acoustic problems became not
longer adequate, Therefore the Structures
a
Materials Panels organixed the present
Specialists Meeting on the Impact of Acoust*i
Woads on Aircraft Structures, which was held
acoustic loads'.
estimation of the fatigue life under the
acoustically Induced strains (stresses)}
li
---
Acoustics.
The developed in the late sixtWs and
methoca lRef. 28 and 311 were
m
imd seventiesn
based on simple r.ethods for rsonse
Avmof
-m 'war wwu
qA
Lee* m Akv. %
"k
Lahamum,. A-
up 1m
T-2
T-3
T-4
9mMIsUa.I.,1A~
Unlike Ihe conventtiosal latigue
esting., the (tall scale acoustic fatigue testing
is normally not perfonmed Aerodynamic
and engine acolstic environment would need
to be generated simultaneously by wind
tunnel and engine sourtcs, or in flight
conditions, to represent intrractions. Insteal
the acoustic test are performed on relatively
samall components or asemmblies whe-v the
localiwed acoustic pres*ure iid can be
, No
simulated in a more practical manert
papers were presented on this topic.
.1
ulmitler
ld9
T-5
M!DU- M bIMFL,&,h
af._
Mi
MuRmUStuy
h Lh
I,
The application of superplastk-aliy
formed and diffusion bonded components
in high intensity notie envtronments is
discussed in paper (19) Two speimen,,
represevving aliruaf cotrol
surfiac- and
superpliaik fonmini
Paper 123) dectribes Advanced
Siatumtal EtnrlW Analysi s ASEA. which
does no( cotain somir drawbacks of the
known Statistical Enev-& Analyi ISPAJ It
its shwn that the erroms, that sotemitrnes
octur when pred'ctie SEA is applied to
tirmiplex sirtictunri assendile are mainly
due to not modelled power transort
nechantsmi
This 'tunnelin(W mechanism
occurs when diret mouplig exists between
two SEA sub-systenv that are physically
imLteg
T46
Cacml
1=4
vARc--natct
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
IiI
12.
txevel"pnieni of tochnritluns to
drtencivine the therniial acou~stic
response at damiaged anid repaire
stractures.
Developnient of niechanismo for
4bnrbng- voerinial acoustic eoergy.
Cullectian of endurance data for new
tiviterialia atid acoustically resilciet
"stubwich ptanels
CZanalenWk1.
1:1
1+
15,
16,
17,
uk=M
Metiuanamm
Nh
in the order o
ULaea1CUiakmn.
I
~r Ilelleopter
E Laud"et
T-7
18.
19.
Application of Superplastically
Fomr..d and Diffusion Bonded
Structures in High Intensity Noise
Environments, R.J. Cummins and
J.P.C. Wong.
20.
21.
23.
24.
26.
27
jdditional referencesG
28.
29.
30,
31,
32,
P.D.Green
British Aerospace Defence Limited,
Military Aircraft Division,
Warton Aerodrome, Preston
Lancashire, England
1. SUMMARY
Acoustic fatigue failures can be caused by
the dynamic response of aircraft
structures to unsteady pressure loading
from aerodynamic and engine acoustic
sources. The life of structures is often
difficult to assess accurately and may be
greatly affected by steady thermal,
in-plane and out-of-plane panel loads.
Furthermore, currently available methods
do not enable fatigue life assessments of
the substructure to be made, despite these
failures occurring regularly in service,
This paper discusses current problems
associated with structural acoustic
fatigue and extends upon this to account
for likely clearance philosophies and
configurations for future aircraft.
2. INTRODUCTION
In the late 60's to mid 70's, aerospace
companies and research establishments were
involved in the development of dynamic
response methods and generation of
endurance data, culminating in the
publication of the ESDU data sheets[lJ and
AFFDL design guide[2].
Pre.IeAtCd ItII
Sympoisiull
/i
,Inpactr f Acousti'l
1-2
1-3
14
REFERENCES:
1. "Acoustic Fatigue Sub-series Volumes
incorporating Royal Aeronautical
Society data sheets", Engineering
Science Data Unit.
2. Rudder, F.F; and Plumlee H.E., "Sonic
Fatigue Design Guide for Military
Aircraft", AFFDL-TR-74-112, Feb 1975.
3. Commission of the European Communities,
Brite/Euram programme: "Acoustic
Fatigue and Related Damage Tolerance of
Advanced Composite and Metallic
Structures (ACOUFAT)"
4. Clarkson B.L., "Stresses ii.Skin Panels
Subjected to Random Acoustic Loading",
Aeronautical Journal of the Royal
Aeronautical Society Vol 72 No. 695
1968.
5. White R.G., "A Comparison of some
Statistical Properties of Responses of
Aluminium Alloy and CFRP Plates to
Acoustic Loading", Composites Journal
Oct 1978.
2-1
..
......
....
......
....
7
t0 i
fired W
aircraft
twlclpto
Goal: Qu6et
helicoptu
Imedo
(v 126 kt3)
A 100
Ieo
- -%/
OK117
of physiological studies.
....... .SU
resetedat
8thmeetng
he
70 ......
fll
on 'hllat
em
......
..
50
.....
40
Figure 1:
Interior
f te AARDproofed
Aw,,eetii' iAeAId
on Airt nsii S
t
.
*
2
k
No0
Fmquwnc.y I tz
Noise Levels of VIP-sound.
128
250
Wing Aircraft
jtructur
es'
he ld
2-2
//
Figure 2:
High
'75
40
eiminlum uttucture
(0.6 mm thik)
,commonly
30
2o
.........
!....
"....
......
maximum
allowable
levels for undistorted
speech, Hereby,
onlynoise
the frequency
range fromn
.......
*.
10 ; ;
too
200
5W
-D
lk
2,
,k
Frequency (HzI
Figure 3:
23
Rotor Noise
10
loudness contour...
.40
-50
.
:
.w.
A ...
...............
....
.... ..
...
....
curve32
63
125
250
Figure 5:
Fiequency Rizl
Figure 4:
wj
' - .
-'
,,
3
i
I]
q
6a
'
I. Halo,
1161"W"11%
o
,o
,
,.
iequAIcY IHII
Figure 6: Typical Interior Noise Spectrum in an
Untreated Small Size Helicopter
2-4
Mounting
Acoic
gearbox noise,
Peatures
Radiation
Structural
of
exciatio
cabin frame
Acoustic
excitation of
cabin structure
Vibration of
Acoustic leaks
surfaets
on cabin roof
coSlcTheoretical
Radiation
Noise field
Inside the cabin
Figure 7:
Noise reduction at the source of existing helicopters offer some specific problems because each
modification is associated with performance penalties
and safety reasons. The palliative measures for
passive noise reduction are dependant on the transmission paths. Ifthe structure-borne path dominates,
interface
modifications
at the airframe/cabin
structuralnecessary.
path is
the air-borne
If, however,
become
shownetoebesdominant, aounterofng sch is
thes
ceng
tanta son
bto e
n
to
order
in
most
needed
are
they
treatments where
Gearbox
Sound
Gearbox
Vibrations
the
2-5
~
6o
':
20
0
Frequcy IHz
Figure 8:
5,2
Comparison(') Absorption
of Measured
(9) and
Calculated
Coeffici.nts
2-6
DRA has developed a method for the identification of the noise transmission paths [10]. During
flight tests, the acoustical and vibratory excitations are
measured with a number of differently oriented
interface response transducers which register the
magnitude as well as the phase. In a subsequent
ground test, mechanical exciters are used at the
gearbox to reproduce the in-flight response. Finally, a
linear superposition is done to numerically simulate
the in-flight response at the interface by using an
adequate fitting process.
5.3 Optimization of Soundproofing
In the development of any new aircraft, it is
necessary to optimize the interior trim in order to meet
noise and weight targets. In the past, this has been
accomplished by using sound pressure measurements and a combination of experience and ad-hoc
modifications which often ended in an iteration
surementofthesoundintensityinsideandoutside
the cabin combined with vibration intensity flow
measurements
real time source location with a three dimensional
vector probe.
lures.
Stringers
dlu
Figure 9:
Figure 10:
windo
*,flOW
_________
-1h
-
r~,
sures.
Resonance absorbers like the Helmholtz reso
nator are mass-spring systerns. The air in the hole of
resonator can be regarded as the oscillating mass.
The chamber volumne located behind,.s equivalent to
the spring. The attenuation bat-dwidth of a these
resonators is relatively nar'ow. By sel.tcting differently
W,,,
.
-provide
Ti,
Mmthik
-the
pedt
J-4
-~Fvjure
Figure 12
lnveshgtiqtoi of ltransmiss~io
loss of
13
A yo
Hmwnycornb Corets
Converted
1,
b.-nlwsttrwti01.ad
04.
15.
..
1' .. .
12 %
07
"
:I
6%
S".rates
structure,
..........
non.
0A
.The
.......
o
........
. ........
0
Frequency
-A A .. ...
ItIil
ooanrcwring
II
Figure If
s~
Fku'ue
tIS
~a-
~Cabom
2-9
SIIut
luselage structure
Figtiire 1:
F
Figure 17:
Schernratic
Diagram
-"
:"
'
"
Figure 19
of the Test
Helicopter
Vrblion
Tton-w .mn
Frequency
Resp-nse of a Genrtmnx Strut Wdh and
Wditout Absortber
2-i0
Helicopters
As an example of an improvement of the interior
noise without large weight penalty, a BK 117 has been
equipped with some of the previously examined
damping and absorptive measures (improved double
wall system with additional soft layer, improved door
and window sealing, resonators). Compared with the
original equipment which also represents a noise
treated interior standard, the noise level could be
considerably decreased (Figure 20). At a flight speed
of 110 kts, the noise level reduction was 5 dBA. At a
higher flight speed, the internal noise level is
dominated more and more by boundary layer noise
especially in the cabin door region which hnited the
noise reduction to 4 dBA at 130 kts. Still, these values
do not reflect the real improvement in comfort, since
very annoying discrete tones in the 2000 Hz
1/3-octave band were reduced by 12 dB at 110 kts
arid 7 dB at 130 Hz.
-o
90
.hydraulic
Basic Noise Tre~aiment
4 dB
5dB
55dB
-l
Srtor=
Addftioe
80
W0 70
Fiture 20.
Noise Treatment:
130
140
esults Before
BK 117 Measureitment
arnd After Additional Passive Noise
Treatment
Fiilore 21
2-11
atao.
Interior,
,a-e-
trim
Sensor
rotllnal Signat
pcontroller
2-12
/6/
References:
/1/
/2/
/3/
/4/
/5/
/9/
/11/
/12/
3-1
DIMENSION'NEMIENT ET QUALIFICATION
AEROACOUSTIQUE DES TUILES HERMES
AEROACOUSTIC QUALIFICATION OF HERMES SHINGLES
par
C. PETIAU*
ct
A. PARETDias~ult Aviation
RESUMIE
ABSTRACT
En &epit de ces difficultes. en S'appuya2nt stir let calcuts et Ics essais prdliminaires des tuiles HERMES.
unc stratdgic ritionneclle est propos&e pour le dimensionnemen:ri et Ia qualification .is-A-%is dc raftoacoustique
On lboutit a un enchainement dessais dont les conditions sont dcermitnes par calcul. Its mockles de calcul dtant cux-m~mcs viltides par comparaison aux
rdsultats d'cssais
In spite of these difricultics, arid rcfcmng to the preliminary tests and calculations of HER-MES stunglcs.
a ratnal strategy is proposed for acroacoustic dimeristoning and qualificatio of structural parts
This leads to a succession of tests, the cor~ditons of
which are determined by- calculations calculation
models being themselves va2lidated b-, comparison
with test results
~DASSAULT
AVIATION
I3
Ii 1 '8 -Fax ',1(1)47 It 14 00
Presenterd at a Svmposiwn on 'Impact of Acoustic Loads on Aircraft Sntrcniires' held in Lillehamnier, NVor..ay, May 1994.
1. INTRODUCTION
pcn> nC
pcusci)
2 d ,utcnlrc
.i)\qiC~ pc~~cn scraotrCcs
hcm'drc pro'
taiqucn d Iord
sp
d.e
t r~ioutm
matcrsv'j C-StC darn la rhcologic est trci nonlsneairc (soir planchc 41, mats qui par contte prescme une resistance mecainquic sntcre'ssantc taudeb dc 20M Mfa) ci une tres faiblc scisibilsie 4 la
tfstsgu ct au.' cffeis (reuailsk (cc nutersali %upportc: par aulleurs des tempftatUresu.petntirc% a
I YW)C en rottant lre's ratbicirient sensible 3 l'ox%dalton)
La nion-lineante dfcffet dc membranec trcs pronowacec dui panncu (%ost planctic 4 Ia courbc dc
flkctc en fowictiows dc Lkpression sutaiquci Ccla we
tradui amss par wic tries forte sensibilsic dc Uaftcqw=~ des modes dc %ibration a la picsimon staisque
* Lc comportcrment comicnple des points a c& IsaLint interne(raideur non Isneairc. hsseress.
e Leffect dc ratdeu 'priesiatiquc" important susccpttble 4fitrc crte par 1*2ir de 13 castle "om'tuslc
i- 20*. dximenultion de frcquencc fondamcntil eutte unc: tile non etnchc ct tine tusle clanche. 'oit platachc 10)
lc-cftsccoplcaroauq
-ioun.
oulg aroatqerprns
dim a Li f.isbie cpaisseur rclitssc dii parnscau. quii
condumesnt a sine scntsshibtit au Flutter don! IParcss L-4 un prealaibl a chlic dc licwroacoustiquc
i oir planchc 11's
zornporicrricns corrplecxs cornpliqucnt ccrtcs Ids
calculs. mais. sits sent tres fatorabics pour le
3-3
comnporenment acroacousuique dcs tuiles. en creant des
dissipations d'dnergic importantes ci des -%cles liinites
(jut r~duiseiir Ics amplitudes des vibrations
3~.PANOPLIE DES OUTILS D'ANALYSE ET DE
VERIFICATION DISPONIBLE
3.1. Ott~
I(It.rieuir
1-a~*:
~i
ILstur
Les maillages surfaciqucs de ccs niodeles acrody namiqiies compontent dc qiielques centairnes a
qtielqucs nijlliers dc faeectte. cc quii est Ic rang dc
la inatrice dc coefficients d'influeneec coiplcxe a
construirec t inerser pour ehaque frequence de
clu
Quand oii nies'inudress qu'a l'acroacoustique exie(pas dc rd%-crberatior d'onde acousliquc) les
operateurs calciitcs sont relativement continus ell
fonection de la frdqueiicc. Cc qiii autorise ante fairc
Ic caleul complet que pour un iionibrc liinituc de
frdquences (queiqucs dizanins aii plus). entre lesquels les rdsultats sont interpolds.
I1 en resulte tin ealeiil relativeinenit Pell
aujonrd'hui.
CciitCUi
Le ddfaiut dvidcnit de la nidth~ode est dc necpas caleuler les sources turbulentes Ccci necessutcraut.
dans l'absoin. la resolution de lequiatuoii de Na%ier
Stokes nis~ationnaire all nornbre de Re ' nolds dii
%ol des avuons. Cc problenie. ciblc d,- l
"Computer Fluid DYnamic" (CF1: ) est asse, loin
di'tre r~solu iunduistruelleiicnm Eni atteiidaiit. certains proposcrnt des techniques uinierniiicdurcs
bas~es sur des muod~lcs seni-enupuruquecs de distribtitioit de source turbuleuite calibres stir des essais
rcfIrreiue 7)
Modclusation striteturale
Elie est generalenweut obt~enue par technique
Cl Iiii1Ta ireli
Ics umodes prolitl ise corinine dcgrc dc lIuberle
pres stnietnraux Onl ealcuile ainsi les ternies tie
leqnatiouu de Ia d%nainiqiie sirnemrale
[T] /
Cela -,1lexception des terines tdchi mat rice dainorissenuent structurale doiit onl iie commait gciucralemnent pas les bases phssiquics ipit pernicttraicnt
de les calcnler LeCsainortisseme its strucictuau\
soul doiie soit derivs d'essais, suit uuu~glgcs (si lai
dissiputioiu d'6nergic par ravoncueitt acoust iquc
preonl par autortissemniit acroclastuipic est ng~cc
poideriuue)
Nio-del 53!iOu_icolislique
iintetiic
3.4
cc qui necessitc done de tres nombreux points dic
calcul cit frdquericc (quclqucs ccntalncs a quciqucs
rnillicrs) contra:icment aul cas dc I'acoustiquc
extcrnc Onl prdfrec utiliser une modelisatioit dcs
cavtles tinicrils par Element Fini tridimcnsionncl
adapt&c a ['equation d'Hclmoltz (voir planchc 7),
associ~ccA une reduction modaic "acoustiquc" (voir
rcfcrcncc 8).
D((,J']x=
4[T 1Pr(telles
4[~ Prdispose
[Du.
La matrice ID ((,xV)j est l'opcrateUr ciassique dec
'aritalvrs dui Flutter (sa singularite correspond a la
%vitesse dc Flutter)
Les niod~Ies de chaquc discipline fournissent Ics
opcrateiirs permettant dc passer des degres dec
libcrte aux paransi~rcs qu'on vcut stiisrc
(accdclrations, deforiations, coittraintes. efforts
itoeres, pression daits les Gluides. etc. ) soit
s = (L~xPour
Ott &du~iit la foniction de transfert entre les presaririgidc et les
k uruenessinsd
pro
dea urbuenc sr
sioaners
iparan~trs
soi sts
msl ii~r
I']jPra
o)
Pr
On cn d'duit Ics spectres decpuissance des paran1,1CS suivs en fonction des spectres et inter*octc
des cornposantcs du %-ccteur soit
)
-- T
m
.V(a)
=X(o)e
aN-cc
X\'(o)
-R.IS (S'
16 IS (S)
cc qui perrnct decfrectucr Ics predictions statistiqites de dur~ce dc vie aussi bien vis-a-%is de Ia
statique quc de la fatigue (A~partir des
expcrinicntales dc resistance en fatigue
cNcliquc et en adniettanit la rcglc dc cuinul dec
doinmage de Miner)
Pour prendre en compte les non-Iin~arittes structurales
qu'on les renconire sur Ics tmilcs H-ERMES) onl
dc 2 techniques
La Iindarisatioit du modeIc autour de INquiiibrc
statique catculd en iion-lindaire (voir ref6rencc 10)
et lutilisation dams Iquatiolt de Ia dxitarniquc
stnictsirale 3 de la niatrice decrigidite "tangente" ;
I'dquilibre
Lc calctil structural dvnarnique non-lrincare
(grands ddpiacenicents. plasticile et rheologie no01
limtdaire, contact) par integration directe dans le
donlaine temips.
cc calcul non lindaire couple Ia difficulte est dec
disposer din mod~le adrodynarnique; daris le dornaine
temips. Pour cela nous utilisons g~iiraleniteit line
procedure simple, honiog~ne a la ruisticitse globale dui
ttodle adrodynainiquc, oii l'oplratcut tic couplagc
mrodynantique est identific par lissage darts le
dontaine frequenrce asec des cifels decraidetir,
apres
dc itiasse ajoutecs,
itiorliiSSetillct et
*Sait-on
3-6
3.2.4. Essais Sur tablc vibrante
A.
Phase prdoaratoire
Ellc dout sc d~roulcr nornialemeut pendanit ki
phasc dc conccption initiale dii vdhicule. voirc Ial
pr~cedcr sesobjeciifs sent :
Larcnisnedsplno
ns
arcnasancdspcocc
*L
ailcus.*
*La
ET DE DUNIONS-
On dll %scrsuccssnnien
2 bjccifsdecouiverts
On dii ier
2 bjecifscorrelationis
uc~esivinen
"* Supporter
Stoll
"* Pernictire
Ia demonoistration de qumalificationi de ki
solution citoisic
(omplic cmi des Innites de Iaprecision ci dc Ia rcprcNetuiati ite des ninnens de calciil el d'essaus disponous somimnis coniduits a gerer aii iieii\ iiiilli
miubles
commupronis elutrc
"
itiefiii
"* Li
.La
a rsistnccdesdiffrens
pur
Oil
erifer
cs tilie
details stricturaux critiques (e~xemple attaches,.clu
d~plieincnt local des bordures du panneau, etc... ). cela
a pariir dc sp.cires de charges locales cstjimns par*Lamsu
1111c
*
dCsoufli-cruc imamis-
u suriniusione-Sculn:q
(le doe
%urpecricaion,
(cf'
1 1I
3.7
entre cssais et ealcul pour l'artalyse dui
Flutter.
On a cssavi6 des tmiles volontairemcnt arnincies pour renconrerr linstabilit de Flutter.
du fait de la non-lin~arit6 dc membrane, elle
sc traduit par des cycles linites 'on rcmarquc aussi qu'ellc est tres senisiblc atla surpression statiquc (la rdf~rence I I presenic ces
cxp~rienccs plus en d&tail).
Les essats et les calculs delit mi~mc configuratioti avee mit turbulence aidroacoiistique
cre6e par tin d&Nctctur sont priesetins
planehe 9.
B.
Lecouletnent a~rodvnarmique rcalisue est tres
complexe. on arrive cependant a recouper
passablement par ealcul les rdpottscs stnieturates niestir~es. en partant des pressions
tiesurecs stir uti 6kmenirt deparoi rigide
clutides
I1011
)cu1,11
ite scia io1tiIitIstiuc dL'desC\lopetlluctittdi
projet livinics
3-8
Pour qualifier finalement le vdhicuic pour les
11parait souhaitablc quc le dimcnsionrcncrnct
sots habitds it parait hautement souhaitablc de
correspond- ii dcs spdcificatioris vrifiablcs
valider la conscrvatisitd dc I'crsemole de la proen essais au sot, cc qluiconduit aux travaux
c~dcurc dc dirnensionnemeni.cine surtout celic dii
Sulvants .
dc charges acroacoustiqucs, par recoud prc~drcsmodi~c
Defiitin ddpro%,cteset
avcc Ics rncsurcs cfl'cctuecs ptundant tes
Deiniiond~pruvctesci
d prc~drcspcmcnt
dcessais de qualification ;iu sol.
peir
osatraius
lavionPoOrSotaumtius
Cc sont, pour plusicurs Lories doe
des caissons rcprescntatils dc: la sousLetudc dc l'implantation de l'instailation d'essaks
structure rcvEtus par des tuiles qui subipertincoic (accdckrometrcs. jaugLus de conront sirnuttanmcinct ou succcssiNertiert tinf
traintes. captcur dc prcssion....) est oinprobl~nic
cnsemble de sotlicitations roeaniqucs ci
ifcl u otdr spoprdstcnqe
thermiqucs. Lenivirornement adroacousdifiie qluidlt
inv rse. sp ~prdstcnqe
d aclivrc
tique devrait dtrc justifid 1i par des essais
stir table vibrantc et/ou en TO P
S. RECHERCHES ET DEVELOPPENIENTS A
Onl dolt rechlerchcr. en se basant sur tes
NIENER
calcuts. des conditions d'essais inajorant
-au plus juste los conditions do vol
Aui-delA dc t'achevcnient dc tIt misc aul point dc hi
Le diniensionnement des tuiles et dc li
proci~dur d'analyso aidroacoustique pr~scotcc. it est
structure adjacente correspoindra '5 ces
souhiaitable diemoner tin certain notobre de rccherclies
conditions conservatives des essais au sot.
et dc d~~cloppemcents pour en conipenser tes lacunes,
tuiles
des
Diniensionnenient des coinposants
citons entre autre
Pour limiter los risques do decouvertes tarLe pcrlectiooeenitt diel'anatvse dei charges
dises de difficiittc lors des ossais d'ensembles. on propose uiie approclie similaire aihi
Ia resoltiioii
A tong termec it pourrait rdsulter doe
priec~dente
dot'ieiquation dieNavier Stokes ilistationnaire ('
Definition dlecondmtons d'essais clenicincocit admissible) A plus court terme., oii souhiaitetaires (essais dc fatigue quasi statique, po
rait Ni~abtissineicit d'uiic banquc decdoinrko doc
vibrant. T 0 P.) pour les coniposalits des
empiriques d,. distributioii de source turoint, atachsiodtOes
(anneu,
luilssolat,
ipiquco , :cs
buloiiic on avat de defliuts de foinic t~
etiiile tpi deau witolit desopifiSattachs,
cl sciiii-anatl tiques scraient calibres stir les
speihicaiolisiii
dvicnient
etc ).qui ds
Lik diienionenint
ssais eii soufficrie par catciit insersc
Ces conditions decssais clenientaires -,oit etaCes inodels fournitirait directemenvt Ia disiribiibites par ealculs coinparatit's asec cellos des
tion spatiale et Iniotesite des sources turbiitentes,
essais dciisenible
cc qui o iterait les inesures Qomiplesos etcl manicknewitrins delicat des champs diepression a hia
parol
L~erctour des ossais elementtaires pcrinii des
iterations de dinicnsionnomicit IclsC,;s;iis
Ccs procedures die cailcil uinisor, pecriniiani doe
d'enseotble soot pluitu presis pouir tie pairiiriticiniter auxscharges aeroiacoustiques., AP ir dos
c:ipci qui'i Li qualiflicatiuoi pour les premiers
%:it.i*
tinres die leponses sti ucium ales. 40o1t aussi a
cia la d&nonstration doe
%ols(iniiabiies et
iiicitre au point pour exploiter les nicsureN eiu%ot
dute a posteriori des niodeles diecalcul as~anit
pour leschiargc% quasi -st.i(CIcomme Hous Ic faisomis
er' iA to% defiiiir
tique, voir reference I!)
oo~5omshusn
Cci approcic rcalwiiieiicort coiiiplcex tic titiailmhcubit01pair iiiibricatioltii de clicil et d~cssa1%
SatsiiauSiir phiisieiirs iiis caln comiporte
t iicidos risqucs dc deflamiic quitf pntwiie
i~ccptable queipour kil set inhi.bite
*AkL.afeclierclciedoprocdes
it
pcrlectioiineiieit ties iiodclcs uiiii
esi entparricultoe iidtspcnsibe -it oii 'interc'sc .1
*ueI.e
3-9
[;I propagation des v'ibrations dans lese,
ldi
REFERENCES
%ehicule , on trouvera la toutes tes difficultes II:
1. C. PETIAUJ, Mte challenge ot the HEW~lMtESlPS
incidelisations stnieturales dans la garmmc des
shingles
"aerf
Proc !nromat colif
SpccrlStraciiires and
rnoyernnes frdquenccs (voir reference 4) . tn des
Mechanicai Testing", Noorwijk, thie Netherlands, 24-2(,
problenies majcurs Cst !,a comprehension exacic
(EAS32,(MbrIQ))
puts la modeIisation dcs phdnomenes dc dissipa-Api19
tion de L'dnergic qu'on caceh derri~re le mot
2. R.I. BISPLINGHOFF, H. ASHLEY. PricLiples 0I
"Matrice d'Amortissemcnt Structural"
?\orrietasticitv - Jovn Wile and Sons Inc - New York
1962
6. CONCLUSIONS
3.
4.
" qu'on
"* qu'uhe
"* Lluclos
rnwnitser
danaI,1
w Ct l'espericlnce a.auctrlle
pserficutent d'esAlur Ics nis.uou des It: dalut dui
projet. I wicondtsn de disposer dc niucleS des
chaIrlgeacroacoustiqusmc
par essamcmis1wfl~ciio
1:11cis de dmiffcultes 11esm
'11rs possible dc trakier
to probbnv- i ucsource en 'trzasallamrit Ics (trmes
tono
ttrmaumlues
dc aI'ms
.merods
Nu%commstaloion
quo cci min~ltimons relooignot .cltc%
dc Ivrperatiosn ACOL FAT mictinecs
par N~ C F F~
, (wi
refernce '), on N %Olteinparticulles lon ou'sssi diffic
roceis Jo comrpomiensonm dulbnc rt~mc strucrure pllwce:
asec denIfpetcimdscwtatmomi bacomIsIquICcen priwipcip
id
15nircu
S.
6.
7.
D) TOUGARD, ltite-t.Iuraril Ptogrmjunle ACOl tAtA~riismi Ikiiriii and R~elatvd I'milnage I olcrajice oi
iS
'tluoufe
P. LANIARY. Citno nrordc deo~ullrjge I lasts'A.\outiquo par operaieur de grille :Iontivre 'jur docrtil.
.aItsollacou~tillUe ci sitnk hoe nont wincidentcs . Mbew do
It rissorito 1! Coulrnpregne , I * enitq I
1)E. NEW L.AND \It irthtsI&tisottsrt0 r'Ais."Ittl %Itnutiol
1rd spvstfal amakal, -r [ik)M I \\ k!"oAVlrinirci I 't
CP
I:
ONVtL.Avltc
II
AL. GMEOGS
stt
Acuv5.i
imt lntls'~
oi tarrqi
irO
It I d,!t1sr.-'V'
PKTIAV. M DE LAVIGNE_.~rl~at
it *dmik!it*at1 0
i u
k, ,h.%#g,;. vsr si, \u.I~sdsreos~
Planche I
~uA~its ON kl2i'~tuD~i
To
Vr TO I". Do QAt.
I SOI
134
130
NNVLeaWYAUX
OA Xji
Eft
miii'c
OO--
atlOI
3-11
Planche3
Pr~sentat*,g tuiles
-des
>FIXATION
clscSCSINGLEJ/
INF.ULANTS
Tuile extrados
Tuile intrados
1uiles intrados
I KiI I~qt110JAL
I`AS I kNCRFFIXATION
XINA~A~ON.I
,P
ruiIcs extrados
IN IUIAt ION
3-12
Planche 4
Comportement non Iin~aire des tuiles
Effet de membrane, influence de la pression statipLue
Hz
Frequency
3003
Calcul lineaire
200
100
Static pressure
5010,0
K'
Comparaison Calcul-essais
(Pression statique)
in mml OI.VF
(IN I~T).
rnbar
3-13
Planche 5
Calcul des effets non lineaire dynamique
RESPONSE SPECTRUM N2 /Hz
Pseudo transfer fujnction
'0
/A
I
8---
MODAL ANALYSIS
-~LINEAR
6/
-(-30%
Frqec
100
120
140
160
ISO
200
Facteur de surtension
(au centre de la tuile)
Planche 6
Yigsuatijon s riCOiaiue du Mach 0 9
3-14
Planche 7
Installation d'une tuile en paroi de la ,)ufflerie HST du NLR
(Derrhire un deflecteur)
Planche 8
Tube Aandes progressives de IIABG
-A.,
......
.2 . ...
3-15
Planche 9
Comparaison des mov ens d'essais
VESYOYEN5Q MAI
CONIPRA-SCQ0
ACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENT
Ripon%*dw
T
NN1ND
Id
RESP ESPE
d,00C
Pill0
30
ODEIL
\NNEI.(11D SPACEPLAN. %I
BO
1:5IN't
c
ER CABIN 0IOIA
AION ENCII
ND
0~R
00000
H.
BFIIIND SPOIL.ER1
%OI\DTtNF..( 1;1 SHINLCE MIODEL~
CORREL1ITW'
CR)OSS
B
PRESSURE
SPECRU
10
...
CALUI.CSLLBSSO
COMPARARISON
0.
~R~pooP
d ol 050800,0d2~ltO
30--------
25
SPEC 1.0
PRSS
1E
5)002
:R*Y
3-16
Planche I I
Comparaison calcul-essais
u.
11-3--,-57
"
__Conf
.....
Codf C
...........
Calculs "linarise.
(Influence de la
pression statique)'"
....
......
20
I.
'
. Conf E
33
Spectres de
rdponses mesur.s
Rsponse calcul*e
(domaine temps)
3-i17
Planche 12
qualification avant
le Ier vol.
Socificafions des
~oc~sac
Vhre
Conception gencrale du
svsteme de Tuile + sous structure
(Supp t calcul)
ssais denen
Dejiition de
de Tuill + sous structure adiacense
adiacente
(Support calcul)
Sp~cifications des
composanta des Tuiles
(Definition de conditions d'cssais
d'acceptation par calcui)
Conception desailleg
des Tuiies
'jAensembles
de Tuiles + sous structure
Essais partiels
de composants
L.
M.
Shaw
Shimovetz
BLDG 24C
ST4Gm
An aircraft
weapons bay exposed to
freestream flow experiences an intense
aeroacoustic environment in and around
the bay.
Experience has taught that
the
intensity of this environment can be
severe enough to result in damage to a
store, its
internal equipment, or the
s~tructure of the weapons bay itself,
To ensure that stores and sensitive
internal equipment can withstand this
hazardous environment and successfully
complete the mission, they must
be
qualified to the most severe sound
pressure levela anticipated for the
mission.
If the qualification test
levels are too high, thr store and its
internal
equipment
will
be
overdesigned, resulting in unnecessary
costs
and
possible
performance
penalties. If the qualification levels
are below those experienced in flight,
the store or its internal equipment may
catastrophically
fail
during
performance of the mission.
Thus, it
is desirable that the expected levels
In
weapons
bays
be
accurately
predicted.
small
tunnel.
amount
of
data
are
available,
BACKGROUND
The
study of flow
induced
cavity
acoustic environments which relate to
aircraft weapon bays date back to the
mid
1950S
when
Roshko
(I)
and
Krishnamurty (2) conducted research in
this area.
Roshko varied the cavity
dimensions
systematically
while
obtaining the tine averaged effects in
the cavity.
He measured the pressure
on the walls and floor.
A single
vortex was
seen to exist
for the
shallow
case.
For
very
shallow
Zata
for
cavities
with
Presnt.d at a Symposium on 'Impact of Acoustc Loads on Aircraf 5r;rure3"held in Lillehammer. Norway. May 1994.
4-2
resonant
frequencies
in
an
Even today it is
open cavity.
referenced often as the "Rossiter
a vary good
and giv..
Equationprediction of the resonant frequencies
in a cavity, if the correct phase and
The
convection terms are used.
equation will be presentqd later in the
paper.
Plumbs. et al (4) conducted theoretical
and experimental investigations of the
flow induced cavity acoustic problem,
A detailed analytical prediction method
was developed based on the radiation
A
impedance of the cavity opening.
table of radiation resistance aind
reactance was provided to utilize the
method.
It
*and does
not
is an iterative approach
readily converge.
The
this
issue
needs
consecutive
on
Experiments
geometrically identical cavities reveal
that they are strongly coupled and
The Mach number
resonate in phase.
for
levels
of
mode
dependence
found to
consecutive cavities was
differ from that of single cavities.
However, this may be because of the
differing length-to-width ratio of the
single and the double Cavity system.
are
frequencies
resonant
While
essentially determined by the cavity
length, mode levels seem to be affected
by the relative cavity width. This
been
studied and
problem has not
requires further research.
Of the various ways to affect the
oscillation process, introduction of
vorticity into the shear layer and the
provision of a slanted trailing-edge
a
were
found
to
have
bulkhead
stabilizing effect on the external free
Oscillation amplitudes
shear layer.
can be minimized solely by a slanted
trailing--edge, over a Mach number range
of at least 0.8 to 2.0, for cavities
with length-to depth ratios above 4.
C^aIties with a I.rncth-to-depth ratio
of
4
require
the
addition
below
upstream vortex generators (spoilers),
resonant
reduce
which
further
arplitudes.
Shaw and Smith (7) presented results of
full
scale
flight
test
of an
a
instru-mented store in a weapons bay.
The aircraft was an F-1ll and the store
was a. BDTJ-68/ instrumented with 21
Data were recorded for
microphones.
altitudes of 3,000, 10,000, and 30,000
feet and Mach numbers from 0.75 to 1.3.
The results showed that the acoustic
levels on the store scale with free
st-reamr dynamic pressure. The levels on
the store increased toward the rear.
4.3
There are significant circumferential
variations in the acoustic levels at
different longitudinal
locations.
Shaw
Plentovich et al
(8)
presented
results
from
DSCWARI.PTZSI
01
"P
aSw M
justification
for this
classification
is that
when L/D>l the response in
cavity
is
longitudinal,
in
transverse
direction,
thus
at
the
trailing
edge it
ia moving in and out
of the cavity
periodically
impinging on
3.
CAVITY DZFIMITIOK
the
the
and
the
Th
4-4
which establish a standing acoustic
mode. Several orders of standing modes
have been measured is cavities as shown
by
Shaw
(8).
As the process of
trailing
edge impingement and forward
traveling waves continues, a feedback
cycle is established.
When the cycle
time for the acoustic wave and the
convective cycle of the shear layer
coincide, a strong resonance occurs in
the cavity.
5.
Um
--
I1M1)z/
le
(1)
+oo/(1+
+1/K,
EXAMPLES OF ENVIRONMENT
PRZDICTION
6.1 Frequlency
In the design stage of an aircraft
it
is necessary to be able to predict the
environment
and
loads
that
the
structure
and
equipment
must
be
designed
and
qualified
for.
The
environment in the weapons bay includes
the frequency of the acoustic modes,
amplitudes
of
the modes,
and
the
broadband level.
There have been many
methods developed to predict the cavity
flow induced acoustic cnvironment but
only a few of the more useable and
typical examples will be discussed.
acoustic
)'.((
4-5
is
where
the
speed
of
sound
in
the
-3.3 L/D - 27
denote
the
longitudinal
(L)
and
the
transverse
(d)
respectively.
mode
20log(P
3 mx/q)
20log(P
-0
-20
STROUHAL
9-,3,3
6.3
In cavities by numerically
solving
the
tim.
dependant
flow
equationn.
One of the earliest is by
Borland
(17)
who
solved
the
two-dimensional Euler equations for
timo-dependant inviscid compressible
flow. His rosults were encouraging in
:0|log(P. X
8/1.* 20 lo(
that
tones
3L/O -0)
(1-1/L]
the
method
in
resulted
in
harmonic
sound pressure
%I" I. ,*d
4" A 6,)?Ad
levels
were of the
order
- 10 0 rod
Both
the
predicted
magnitude of
fluctuations
I..-m
fL
OWU?&TZOMAL
environment
---- +1 IS
( M)
S.
S-
Many efforts
predict the
NUMBER
- 10 (I-
100
to
10
6.2 Amplitude
.-
moaxq)
2 log(
Considering
the numerous
research
efforts
which
addressed
frequency
prediction, the Rossiter equation, with
the most accurate phase and convection
as
term available, will result in
accurate prediction of the resonant
frequencies as any other method.
mx/q)-13M+ 9
"M
reality,
13
numbers,
..
m m mw m
mm
..
frequency
and
n m
--
mp m
4-6
confirmed with the experimental data.
S.
7.
SUPPRESSION
Literally
hundreds
of
suppression
concepts have
been tested for their
effectiveness
in
controlling
the
acoustic environment in open cavities.
Tests with small scale wind tunnels up
to
full size
aircraft
have been
conducted. Water table tests have been
effective in evaluating a large number
of devices.
Rossiter (3)
in 1966
9.
DhIUMICZS
1. Roshko, A.
"Some Measurements of
Flow in a Rectangular Cutout," N.A.C.A.
Tech. Note 3488, 1955.
2.
radiation
From
Two-Dimensional
Rectangular Cutouta
in Aerodynamic
Surfaces." N.AC.A. Tech. Note 3489.
1955.
porous
leading
edge
spoiler
is
and
the
effectiveness
of
the
Krishnamurty,
K.,
"Acoustic
3.
Rossiter0
J.E.,
"Wind
Tunnel
Experiments
on
tne
Flow
Over
Rectangular Cavities at Subsonic ond
Supersonic Speeds,"
Royal Aircraft
Establishment, ARCR.&M. No. 3430,1966.
4.
Plumblee. H.E., Gibson. J.S..
Lassiter.
L.W.,
'A Theoretical
Exoerimental
Investigation
of
Acoustic Response of Cavities In
Aerodynamic Flow." WADD -TR- 61March 1962.
and
And
The
An
75,
5.
Smith,
D.L.,
and Shaw.
L.L.,
"Predictiuliof The PreosuteO clIlatLon
In Cavities exposed to Aerodynamic
Flow,"
AFFDL-TR-75-34, Oct 1975.
6.
Heller.
H.
N..
and Bliss,
D.B..
Aerodynamically
Induced
Pressure
Oscillations
in
Cavities-Physical
Mechanisms atid Suppression Cc'nceptns."
AIFOL-TK-74-133, Feb 1975.
7.
Show.
L.L.,
and
Smith
D.:..,
4-7
Yu,
Gutmark,
K.,
E.,
Smith,
R.A.,
"Supersonic Jet
Using CavityAIAA 94-0185, Jan
JM.,
H.W.,
McAvoy,
Bartel,
15.
"Cavity Oscillation In Cruise Misatle
Carrier Aircraft,"
AFWAL-TR-81-30L6. Jun 1961.
R.E..
and Dix,
R.C..
Sauef,
16.
"EngIneerina Modei of Unsteady Flow In
A C:Ivity."
ALDC-TR-9117.
Dec
1991.
17.
Boriard4,
C.J..
"Numerieal
Perdition ot The Unsteady rlowflold In
on Open Cavity,"
SS.
Haakey.
AIAA-77-b73,
W.L.
and Shang.
1977.
J.S.,
90-0049,
Jan 1990.
Yaw,
A1AA-
22.
Lvaluation
Shaw.
L.
L..
"Full
of Supproeloros
!cale flight
Consept ror
48
Open-cavity flow
Trans~ionaI-cavity flow
Closed-cavity flow
Fiq
typ-s of cavit y
Three
1
&~
t lw
Fl.j
(.111
*'nI
Sket ch
rt
b'c-I I
. " AVvt t Y
V b."1C
~-~~"110
~~~#L'K*
bd"*V.
U.gVg
O
WVw-m
120
20
Iii
(k..tt
~1I
CtII
~ t~
tW
~0
tw.4A
Full
4
Ft;
.1'ACCklt tc 1V~.'vp1
J
100
2*0
Soo0
4-9
SO.,; G.-
acoustic eigenmode
Rossiter (1964)
,,0.........
l.............
~~.
..
...
0
10 SnILIS
'
*. .. .....
..o.......
0=-. ...
............
140
O
Z' &
15
130
- ~
'""
5 " ............
$NItL"
01-
Z ii
...
0"I
.5.
0
1.
IODOOUd
low
IlokxKV - -4
Fig 7
modes
14)
Fig
Full scale
F-Il1.
weapons
v.v
3pect ra
10
*0
U.
to.0.10
IN
UA*N.. C"
IS
#24" k.
-CAP C.I
A0SP%.
9ft
0-h*
1'0
tie
t'f
....
r.~
*z--i
''99vI I
AP) *. 'W
0F
-u-n
ma.
%'I-,
I'I
,.Inh
It.-O
It
--
nt
4.4111 SI
lln
4-10
T-Tp-TTTTTITfFli
loc
0
21-
130
ONE-THORDl
ETE
OCAEeW
,Mv(e
." o
100
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~5
,~~~~~~LLLL
i3lI.J. .LLLLL.1...L
.4
0.0
W~0 Mil
1,111WANv
-"I
1.44
(Kt,
Ill
LI
12
5-1
lice let etigittes, that domtiinatedh the cicititiercial leet IItI 9Sis,
usci
Csubstitutedl ht I os B\I
I ass Ratio (1.1k hP.Ipieslls 3111
tirlaclatis. appevaled kitI 9icii, atid I ligh ll-Ilass ratin (I111IPR,
tshiicalh Ic I I tttthxchais. aipleartec in 1970s, Iblis evolutioti lest
to a prtogrcssivels reductioin of' the aircraft emit~ted noi0seLati
spite of' aIenniplication of' ni1se soucite conipatietutts and inacelle
designt
Preiented at a Sivnmpcsuu
tini 'Impact
cfAcovita Icccids
cmAirt tall Strwcmarts' hei tittblehamrnvme,
im 1cmcj,
9W,
5-2
mixing noise (see Figure 5.1I). Fan noise norrially results the
dominant source at approach conditions and is a significant
contributor also at take off cotnditions.
Fuiture engines generation wvith Veix Hfigh ByN-Pass
Ratio
(V1I13PR, typically 9:1) atid Ultra High By-Pass Ratio
(UI-!IPR, typically 12:1+15:1) turbof'ans are expected to
increase the fan noise (because of the larger fail configurations
and the probably increase of in flow distortions interatctintg with
fan due to the shorter nacelle) accompanied by a shifting of fani
tones towards low frequency (because of the larger fatl
1)1&
IE
NXI
__
LN5P_________
Fig=f 52, y-
l -vrAIs.1,c
hme mtetllmmmeacueti IU31'R
iutitofeeng
JE''
T A)4S
NIETAALS
COMPRESSOR
s1JUIY
7)))
IrRrt4s1KVS ..PiaR
TiRaiw4
TUtRBINE
TURBOFANz
INE AW,
(Forward)
JETEAIS
JE
FAN, FN
(R arwad)
~ ~
N,~d
,.
tiarlofluts and11
the lowvfeun: Conttent it1'thle emitited ntoise
rqitc
usill repsresenit it teclttological chiallenige Irminacelle atid eniginte
mariiiuttactiirers ito wihich is deitiatded the developtment of lovt,
leqtieiicv litters. tot neglect ing tilt%,possible apiplicationtiot'
active Conitrol noise teclitiques
-low
L
j
~ ~~un nuhOI,~imnportanice
Si N~I
fire folloss itg mtaitn steps ill tire nacelle acontit c designt
procedure need to be outlined
-
b.%
calculatimng the contributors oft individual noise sources,
secoird bycorrecting the p~redlicted noise for atseveral niituibter
(iofeffects during propsagaitiont. third by sumrming aill the
corrected contributors
For a complete analysis the first step shall conisider the
finllowitig norse souirces, though someni' ofhlemr are oft less
ott tire overall amrcrsft noise ( it: compressor
broaidhittd ntoise anid tones, turinbte noise, comnbustor ntoise)
-
hii
flitan us~
noise,
14t1t
sicad% llossdtstlurttuu
oie
tonles
0-forsiatd amidrearu atdi,
Ii~r
cir)
tnicelle,
mnoise
mreasturemmentts
drurmi$ prumiots
pe flight trials, al~so
useful for enginie itnstallaitionr 0lhtcts verificuititio,
the tipdarted aircraft noise predictroti is coimpatred u itli tire
target troise limtits tceritficatiotr limtits and/or aitrport rules)I
raid threrelevanit miarginis iire estitnuited itotolc tsdecision
on the aidoptiotn ofiacouIstic tratItitIlt OritimenaMcle Intake
atid exthaust ducts.
Speed,
* lite far field radiated noise is thien evaluated, for each time
intterval of the aircraft ittatioeui~vre evolution, in three steps tIrN
W. '
-
itrbuit hi ourdbiamd
noist,
tuirbinte
1lov%
distortioti tomes.
triewk neato lns
jttruetnmi
11
tltubnei tiii
rie
JetishuCk assIctIVttd tioise,
jet wigIlallp Initeractionu
noiose,
airfrante troise
-refraction
-atmospheric
attenuation.
reflection,
instriment Kundsiidth filtering suitrlation.
-measuring
-groutnd
S.A It~
-wt...it
Is5t- hou
Aicrft ois
3.2udatngorgatusitus
3.2. A~~rmtt
~l~b\h
Predictioti itethixls are usnialls. hiased on file emistence ofai data
baseoh'icasuied dakta
.-.
.,
mi
i~e1ML11
air friVI1citis
rneirrl
egn:arrlsmn
r lo&
entillttk
nsnlNtn
frm200t05967dAorTkof
fo 30t 55
7dAfrTk ~
80) dIA for Approach
no limitations
IA
IA
ne
ne
**
6Cipe
6Cupc
silent
A at3
.FRPn3
tg
tg
I.*4,*4
NmIinlv
tlmakv
rcIesc25)
Protlklit" 11
ol
A suninanmr
of certi iicatibo rcquiremniut for Stage I aircrafts Is
given tin I'igure 5 8
Ia
froit 212
(9) tot06 it)
IS
IE
DSG
tioni 107tat to 21
5)
ilt) Ititutattiutu
tile duct-acoustic
a reluited uitteitutioti and continuie hlouomgl
ialls si' to qutititlit tile at~oustic ticuititteit marit iteesd to
iacl iein1uidateuto
file required attenuatton is generallk butscd, altenwitivehv, wti
thilethre lollos ittg criteria
5-6
-
7An
-,
~FTZ.
I
-~
j~lflows.
I
-j z=_ I
F~~~~~g
fI5Sii
nr
l.,s
Md
....
'.
RMHO-C
-,
TOYAk
3OUNDPOWERN5SUlDON
(055
J W0 M04"3
I'he evaluation Ofthe t)ptiinun linpedaiiice, for a given duct
teometrn (diamteter and length) aiid internal flow velocity,
:'ql'M
.,w.. nI C 5 n
,ndo*l,.i,
requires the constructioin, fo)reach firequemley. of a data-bae..i
conttaining the atieinuition provided bNa set oftduct Internal
'm.lnw5.
dn54
dfnt
surface Imtpedances
At the end of the above prmcess thle defiuititoii of the acoustic
[Me data basec is calciiluted h%appl' ttg the iiiode thcorN and bs
treatiticttit is focused oii those liniers having mititedtitces as inear
restricting the ainwlNsis to the: hard %sall acoustic cut-un imuxles
as lXissiblt close ito thlet ptiiiitinl Imisediteel~
especiallv III
Olodes sslimch
propaxgate %it titinattenuation for the hard %sall thtose frequenco rangfes %%Itichi
are coiisidered itioe critical for
duct easel ',Kitne assunptions regardiiig the acoutsits cnerff
aircraft noise ceilificaltium (e g faii blaide rXIStng CL'reqeiic
distribution among ducts modes are neccssan Coaiumonlh tile
and relevanit lianiloiics)
equal energp distributioni. soinctilies factored b%a bisitig
function (more emrphasis to %%ell
cut-oln Models) 1151, is
, Inet
lier
sign procixlutc is based onl the availahitit oh1
conisidered
Impedlance moudel% data-baise and is articulated as folloi~s
In particular cases. w~hen the acoustic crierg) is iwnuunstored
IIIa limited1 Inwuber of' acouastic ntmak-a tCg for thlt fan1tones),
5.7
Locally reacting liners canl be grouped in three different main
classes (see Figure 5.12):
6.
LINER CHARACTERISTICS
-linlear
resistive liners;
-mainlv
*resistivc/reactive liners-,
tesjstive/reactive liners.
ECM U
___________
54V ORffim
I
K0
ka
1ge2
-s lvial -nflhguratlom-0t"1
LOMLY
AMTW
Watifl
-l
15c
LCLYRFACTINO
LINERS
PsROPAe
60o040
AOOUTC
AO045IC
hUPa
AMI
DASLSU
sound field
rK*
14i
klO Aii SVK
WWIt5ON
kQCAm
U.=CMperforated
111W4 4O
5-8
Design parameters are the D.C. flow resistance and the non
linearity factor, defined as the ratio between the D.C. flow
resistance values at flow velocities of 200 and 20 cm/ts.
Also for this type of liners the reactive part of impedance is
mainly governed by the honeycomb core depth with similar
ieffects to those of perforated liners.X
Non locally reacting liners are currently matter of research.
The. acoustic response of this class of panels depends on the
whole acoustic field acting on the panel surface (acoustic
pressure distribution) and it is not possible to identify a single
parameter characterizing the liner acoustic behaviour.
:::1
m~L5s~H~C5
PCRFOPTE5
FACG
LT-I
HEHC
PROIANTGDnI
LI*NERS
RE-ACTING
S~OUNPROPAGATIONPARALLEL
AND0NORMAL
TOTHELINERSURFACE
INIDE
THELINER
ITIBTO
COMPEIT5
PANEL
RELATED
10
4MNSEC0,1.055
cy THE
rh
WHMAOUSE
A Cs~rTc
CKARAC~tRISATIoNr THE
NoFtoW
ONOO(TkN
IN DUT
Non
:-*
~"
duct/panel combination.
Figur SI I
-.
iennoHmtms
ACOUSTIC
:::
loc,11 teli
nei. Twolnie
Fgi~w
5 14i-"ypicalconfilliaraion
of crcum~rrientiaI
nion1-11v~
reacting
lie
h
ciwintiv iiistr invemigaton insideaCt4rac
rtirdetenurried seno-
emtpoiricilll
, JIK 11, 20,. 21, 2121through tlie experimienital
of thec acoustic properties of its coiiipoiieiiis
f ools anid test facilities dedicated to these
sunimnariscd toiFigure 5 IS
tests are
lactrig1f
sheet irtesisusuaill) tlitasur ed 11%
mieanis o'toa
Raulortieter, arc the timllus
ting
.
efoae sheevt 1)C floss resisitaite,
w~ire
irnesh 1)C 11iosresisatice and itoi huriarith tactor.
bulk mraterial 1)C tiov%resistance tor tunit o hcn
5-9
RAYLOMETER
EASUMEviNT
OFFACING
SHVrT
m)ROrrY
AND5FPYWM
The flow duct facility can be used to correlate the insertion loss
of the complete panel with the incident sound field.
IMPEDANCE WilE
jIL
Wrr
FLOW DUCT OR
ABW;ORHER FACILITY
-N-Eg-N-L-OS-S---SUREN-INSMJIWv[,s(T WIASUREMI,
WrrHGP.A2!NCrFoW
RA'L-NEE
NtIODE
IDEVICE
SPINNtMC
FUTACILITY
FLOW111.1
W,n
IMtPEDANCE kkI(iI)E.t.IN(;
IJ%V.N
hjks, S 17I
,'
1-.1.
is t,~ Ing
sI.v
~16
...-
'...
.~.....
....
11t11
sowid genehimtmr%
n
ockt%
ile
Iv pemmsteshl.d
ninsid
thle sautie ditriiti hieluemucs btut t~kwofbrpihawe to
~at
'~-4
,,
II
1~
spiiu* modek
geneator itit. niovebte ornonel enWcd
to the
aiid domsmiireasii %xutid pro;1paation,
other for up-stream
consisdilt(int0 a circunifCeutial arfas of' etuall% spaced
o the nsAMMUMs
t(hose tuwuks~ de~lmetXI
soWsjidgenera11tor
...
0
C3
I
S,.
the~II
linsed
prvium
ltessiatrels wuineovd
tfix
isomi,
corispa
1101e
the el~lecied
tAO end ItIUtliers, t0 edULCe
awemei
FIJVSTIL'.M
NOISL
1`1PI~AGATON
2!JAALYSIS
----------
AkIAT
--
~ ~
J-
__
No~~USUJI
~PAM=
Fig~u~5
n~41d"111s
t. p~'.n
il.
Ftgtai
8.
MEDC1ION
u'.Strxwe
otAI.m. NO~th.~e
AIN)5p.
'
1)Atkk.Wir ikDICt1t( N vi
kl)k I
~
-,
otithmsdi umpdatmiig
'
tisalN wtisstw,
* reistis'eltetacis'e.
*luetw ressstviisete
wts
4V'"A
\5-4.4wd~
s~
iS"1i
the Al NOM51
'ollssat atmONNmectw
lis tisilules isae,it a gicat
tkeIl-Ilit%aisdallulosthe: sitsit,
toalts
tiotmi
Itesis
....
r..Ier
9
_______Noise
0t
t
R"
.L.
ZI h-hI>
\jl
~Carrbtidge
Ii
12
13
14
Jotui
li
tini oit
ta %Itn a pitIot
.011 itituld
to
oltitititil
IK 14/.1Isiitt.
i tobe ollosswd ii. c~i4iitc
Ao.i.
oeict %kith a poiteAlWi,11,
'
b.,
atmglnt.~
~Sotlisatc
V.mke
& M
'ouki.I
Wt
:0d
ItFtFR CI
S Aituwenmu-,
Ptimhti~m
ttsmestsat
Ian
t,
NASA 1'4,M
i~
Anastmtwum.. *aI
I't.lIkbtat
aum.tI~oH.
I %Natot
114
.. i
lnpcimm
I-
I-..tk
NAlJ AIR4I~tai
I li
':tt
WA ARIWVt.
%%Ithtat
A.oiiit'am
I
1m~
Othe~
mi
tesaelos
iie.
l.tu
M.dninir awli 11igh ...iimi Iv-tu.sit I Cesjt. I it.I uo
t
14,1 ,'91i
anWVit-AtKi.1 :~1,
I mitittiiti
A11ti0, ) 1, ant.( thtiaonI.o\, Y , 'Nci
'N''..
I .0r
Mcellit. I II I -e/..a
1.ki
t'i
.)'Imgneis'~t.neDt
an onq c.twvew%oi.%41
liounii~m'
Afiu1tatotg.i I)
Iti
Immtith.-c
tCtmwd
I~~~'st~.
'I tl1
1k.
I %cmOiquit
In an
ot Suiid
1111ioi111-ioi. an.] Alttimualoi
I ea1dt t.uhti I )a... I of A,~. So.k at
A..ouittt..aIl
I -X I 110tI' 1
Aiiinca 41). 1,1 112
I 17 i..e, I J , 'Sptnninjtg MNdeouti
.AIj
ititI
k~p.ia
Ut,~~'
%tili A..tit..
treatnwiet and Shviaied Ikolost
'4
i0:1.
1-%1
t~w
R4 am.. Dallte-IAu
%tc'tliatwo I'm an
I .1tetutsim&0X
litIhnkal
l.1 )lm~dts'
1Ciuomat.
AihIM-ma
intiitAt 4%aimnntm
MWI4l''
65.
SU MMARY
IN FRtD
))ICTION
notss urces
silsources, which ire thlesubject sitlit
paper, ire getieralls- overlooked Ili the%aircraft slesigit stige
because, upl(to tos, tlteY Were Cstisiderel iiisigittticatttf
I'liess' acoustic
z2a
(\ N
.0
Cst''esl3
C ilia,
e istnttul.'IIs
1iitnai
(4i ailt istlat
1
'ni sslw toIts1V
sp~edstsulvi't s itu is' tise is' this' silk
tttteVs'
Itis~e is
st~l~inxssitttg at! iltidet tht'ewsis iisit
!hii
radiatest ti11s' st IlrillAtt sItI' ssin,1'u jistiglie tVt asis
MssvNath
%.ii,'v
itsue Idis hetted. atler Pihillipss iRet A)t. as
(tret the list several yesns at NASA. Wse have bescii mit kiisl
Viluaissii
41i1ss'i
td is 040)l
i
hsy stmtaislatsst'sgd
0itC Miligts'4t sletIV itssii,
Missisles
lite halt
st sItliereti
1t11t11sl1
regiin tsr M4,11-As
N~ash
MIJi is Jetetttiiii'll
Vl'tit.5 i''.
111i'
1.
It
ss ,I
I N1 i
iKWstesI
K
ill spirs'itsi Int~itilsti
lchsit64'ti lasl~tttilmIii
,
itahsitti W.%,. sI '51 1s.si
Was es li5%1Wt.Atlit Sitss. slits
IlCifie
stsh 1i Ret I alsis cistisisl!sied the sIti~clatjiiue
'D
i wIutgsolst,
iCD
iitei sssinjtktes Willitiltte twill21
i'iii
nssules sit lie F.Ii S/?sID ll or~hitl ake sstt AtidI Atdintg
I tit: stuslies
MnIeosuver kvhes-tinsslsg ictttsioitats 'it atis taft
assisciatist
XIs Is
ny slyest lite tsetigtIIIi sJ sflytaIttIs an
is tit the xesisloitg Ilais. sit the NASA I1 11 I IAkV 11sght
I%
tiutt
Mals JIMi
.IIsr
I
ti0
KVlIVII
is.
NIv
A.
l'
V,
i.
1'i'
MI,
6,
k'I
.1
1It
islens
Mietsle
5
oi~nitlu~lm
h
I ts
~Astsltiii 1,.sisji
Isiili
V, AnsI:
ssIluttisit
Me s
vt
Iiii
i,
si
ibthe
ls full) espI'ssel let 'siti
st
IVIstleg eslUAIIs
koa.'~~mmeriNotsi.Alliss I VV
T6-
'I able 1.
T.. 'K
N,
313
755
1114
13701
1.32
40.7
52.8
56.2
57.7
1.66
1.80
1.87
X/t)
Y/D
2.5
11.5
2.5
2.5
7.33
6,52
6.34
6.26
(PATH ,,MIinM611TT;1112-6)
YO.*.S
to.
765
--- 5)-
---
1t4411
is__
06,
6.19
@1
0.100
1 isgt;V 1
on5
to
Ihbe lagei'li,
I:
icIcn -w*uits, j'te'sUtv 11C'40 X/lI)
a"asI vtri
stoe
wt
the KI 11W
IVat~'sts
41tast.N s
11I
In
I .gute 2
Stiuhal ttesqUeswy
al.'ttp s'o lieratti
~W
tO
lIts a khit.- it
ishe sb ltturwKss level, tile ortuittwal klcotgtt
t of;~tlr
te aLm'k
di
'4vsuutt Ilse data
mtnelsl rssqutrel
arat1t sstruhAl
trelueta -%\5,
In l'rUV 2'uu 'Went the %A1114
alslg
e %aUICso l~twz patht Of I gI$gt I 1stf the let elti
ass-s4tatgs *it
ss
Met'.t
f 9
a.tkall
A gfssl
~liprtws'il
I OVK
6-3
2b
Md
2,0 M
0 ..
15
u%4*v
Ji
'0) 5
3
''r
~r'
-..
"'s
ILIihock
~, &~i
.1c
100,14
I (waitts/ni) = vVl I
1l, 4Sl
V(MN,-'- NL, )1
(6)
(7)
*~6
(5)
I?
I *R R
IN
altt
bets ili
ahr
I- And f i
vil~wt
isisA
dla,-ti
i tiseslsin I .sle 11
-litui' 1
tukl
The M pl~spef
shaft 4l the
Ir~wstiess
1, -1l the Issallas
wstal peak alspiutasLk salla
It kiv'ati ts'hwtvvsl
Mew ss0tsh T*Vttkens, shownFI
at A
nans, %.4ipe
luat
i.4 aI
at o9 lAr,t isatOL.ip,~
shiftesl
li
Ih'an
q
it
It
21)
If,
I it)
I tatl
1 17
is lemisatesl ito b
6-4
The maximum sound pressure levels listed in Figure 3 show
that the shock noise components radiate most of their energy
upstream in the directi'n of the nozzle inlet. In this
direction, shock noise totally dominates the jet noise
components described in section 2a.
By way of illustration. Figure 4 shows the excess noise
generated by screech and broadband shock noise for a series
of nozzles. Here the measured sound pressure level,
recorded at MI 80 and 9 = i5(w. is plotted against the
parameter fI=(M,' - I1)", which is related ito the nozzle
pressure ratio through M, These sound pressure levels are
shown ito vary significantly above tnose recorded for shock
free nozzles. The solid line represents measured sound
pressure levels for shock free je~s. Point A represents the
Mach 1L5nozzle design point at 3 I.I. Point C
represents peak shock noise for overexpanded operation of
the KM= 1.5 noziles, and point It thi. peak shock nolise for
their correeponding underexpanded operation. The nozzle
that appears to have the worst trend for high amplitude
shock noise generation is the conical convergent-divergent
(C-l) Mach 1.5 nss~zile.There appears ito he no operational
point where shock noise is significantly reduced, Its model
nottle geomnetry is derived from that used on P.1Wbengine,
at cruise lxswcr setting for F. I5 aurcraft. Eixcept for a few
opecrattoisal points near !t%designt Mach iiuinber, the
convergent nozzle appear% ito be nmoresatifatoory than the
conical C-D1.
140substaittslly
MOCde~ c-3,M,
0 ftileilly .apanatd
Equiv ceonesktitt nezL.
4Cconiacol C- 4,
130
4.
siC
their engine nozzle outer divergent flap system are the F-15,
powered by twin Pratt & Whitney F-100 engines, and the B1IB aircraft, powered by foir General Electric F-101 engines
in two twin nacelles. The F-I5, which currently performs
its mission without these flaps, experienced fatigue failure of
its outer engine nozzle divergent flaps on early production
aircraft delivered to the USAF. The B-IB aircraft
experienced fatigue failure of the forward h*inge mechanism
that held the divergent flap in place at the trailing edge of
the nozzle lip. However, for the B-lB. it was not possible
to remove the divergent flaps, unless one was willing to
rtduce mission potential.
It is important ito note that not all aircraft which use outer
divergent flaps have had failures with their system. Notable
examples of trouble free operation are proivided by the F-14
and F-I8 aircraft. These aircraft have wider engine
centerline spacings. To understand the problem associated
with the F-I5 and B-Ill, it is necessary to introduce two
important phinomena that occur specifically in aircraft with
twin engine nacelles, and with engine centerline spacings
near 2 lte diameters in the cruise power setting.
The first phenomenon, termed twin supersonic plume
resonance (Ref. 14). is tassociated with phased coupling of
the turbulent large scale structure oft each engine's exh-aust
ptlume. Utnder these circumnstances', acoustic feedbiack
associated with the jet screech cycle is increased producing
higher klynanst levels at the tttte-no'zle
phenomcnenoi is assoctisied with
exhaust plane. The secotind
the ihesktridg and tsursting of volticitt front airciAlt fotelsoly
pans. Twin engine nacelle, generate at region of low static
pressure in the -iacclk Afterbasly inter -visozle rvgtoit flit
lowsstaic pressure proivides, a drivinig force fort the
convsctw iottoburst vortitity into the regioni of the isa lc~t
Alterhss~l'a.
FAc;hkif dtotes phenomniea %an he illustrated usnin
SPL.4dil
4
110
w.
0
0.1
1.0
1.5
(W'
l-iturc 4
2.0
2.1
I)sIV
\bhaul,
iand
IAO
hlaC tese
dt-ni A genets
1%-utii.o
arsi htistktvisi-t t% iati
N thde is-i ansi %h6s. rw~sw
site
U
nli1 ini
ft upget-siii lets Ir wtilt is.. twign
i.. Is-A at wessial 'I[ the atir att 'Aw. that tiave h~ad
,osr-tivnt'fisiitiagi
taitisme is' se whati tale as'umstis h,%hail
In ak'uitiat'uian
BItot
titl JIrm
lun eshansi frant A 1-lIS ;naJl empwnnJA$C
tia',zlesollv~
ITe
arid araiting uniheAttieat A n~sl
Aonsegei
pts-ssurc f-4114, k.1 itie M, *I 121) the centerlitne
pAkin$ 0t -AsI plumet i. I 1) naale dhanieters the
se
M a hiffh
kchheivii rxsarsl is %creatWs ',.%O~Jtiorn
Itiklitei5 sp-Arksaure At A fixed lpoint in the M ti o
I-Rom thil 1'lsitograph. one ari easall dstdI-islnt that
the entire R-tat strusturrem
trainseh pisusnet% couphlSdl
i
lrge uak he~lial Isuipcnuesisituerm Intensw ttseis&
t.so1I t0
enseige tra-m cash plume iiiAtqwa
4ria
m'; -obsk rllk
to
il,auntrrAern 0ot th nz le it the tusaiatted
let '~5i
Con:Iiatseit then lV..fa$ar,, 1-s
aW*sl OhWWwt-zl Aletssls
.ase
-'tq;
qt
iisIsl the Owtv Ltotsuaitses in Pei 14. the
X1Ptitaist .4 t'e
a'
wav
tii~ iter mwsalzlregst.11
aM Qls
atliNts-J). is ttt~e
wv,
ilaitt iian that asissa~itwst %ab
'psivto-'ua -ol *aaaglv naizle It as this4
%-he5
'tre ima's
~rcli
TIesjueu
II.NWNI4
N0t/
1- 0011-11, DIVl;KtiI:NI II
14"Clornm flap.
iatrira, and.s
W-sa vafsa'ae
Air&fckia
-, gettsu)
lw
Isxm
utes In,- issaisl
114c'se
sr~lie
afteiasala draft pet.alise. that %oikuW att%,efrom usassise ta-0
WelsArahiaaet
aset the enguite naure
t
.ua if the%
s
merfts'sesl
siA., ausrafi that 114%;C
'-eti plAf~J~t
Ali%
,11
Outet
liSONAJt I
.4
to0
INI
lVI~N 11i~llPLUM
4i
i
I-SIuuitaro
reduasm..'s
,1 mls-i
bytia~ss,
liv
usO oh
~1
6-5
0c
L
0
0o.-
0 -
oI
POSSIBLE
FAILURE
-------------------------------------------- -------- -------
Co
So
.
1.0
r
-"
1.2
Figure 6.
3b
-, .,
1.4
1.4
.o
on,
1.8
2.0
aircraft. The
,,00e
'
"
-A.o-,.*0
"
Figure 7.
!!
6-6
.025 ............
LH Engtine
n.i
fs (predicted)
.020-
,
.015
Pressure
(PSI) .01)-.
-6
D
LH,
/
RH
.005
100
200
300
400
500.
Frequency (Hz)
Sr .Figure
9.
4.0
0--Flap
LH Engine
.. ,
Strain~~~2.
ggs
Acceleration3.0
4 .0
: ':,--Strain
.(s
Strain gages
Aceleromete
Figure 8.
0.
-2.
1.0-
train
-- Acceleration
100
200
300
400
400
50.0
500
Frequency (Hz1
Figure 10.
(9)
6-7
3d
1.0r
D-Flap
.8
LH Engine
.6
Coh ernc
Pressure-Strain
8,33% full span model of the F-15 and F-15 S/MTD was
conducted in the NASA Langley 16 Ft. Transolic Wind
Tunnel. The full span models are shown in figures 13a and
13b. The objectives of this study. were to determine if
testing in
awind tunnel would produce similar results to the
F-15 flight test program and to determine whether the F-15
S/MTD research airplane with its 2D-CD nozzles would face
fatigue problems like those that plagued the F-15
Coherence
.4
jpotential
.2
0. 0
S~airplane.
100
200
300
400
500
Frequency (Hz)
Figure II. F-15 full scale coherence between applied
dynamic load and flap strain field.
.
3.9"10' P (psi)
P (psi)
2.6I10 Q (psfl
(10)
(11)
Figure 13.
10'
tunnel.
Figure 14 presents a summary of the dynamic loads recorded
in both wind tunnel and flight tests. These loads are
correlated with the aircraft dynamic pressure, Q. All results
pertain to operation of both nozzles at a pressure ratio of
3.89. Transducer 72 is positioned at the D-flap location in
both the flight and wind tunnel experiments. Transducer 75.
is located on the model in the L-flap location of full scale.
which corresponds to an outboard location on the left-hand
engine 180r from the D-flap sensor.
10
Time
(OIRS) 10'.
2C0
400
O
Figure 12.
600
(P SF)
80)
100C
NPR - 3.89
"o
Full
F
.050
* 8.33%model, #72
.%
*
model, #
P(RMS)
C
#72
se,
s
.025It
0 .
600
400
20
1000
800
16.
Q , psf
.0 7 -- -. .
'fs
Figure 14.
. . ..
.. .
..
..
. .
. . . . .
31 Hz
.06
.85
.05 w
0. 0
6 .04
.03
.02
.
C .01
02i
0.
w._
0
sv- ,"s
L'--
_ i
200
RH "=Wic
LH no-Ue
7 75-5
,-.
400
600
800
1000
Frequency (Hz)
TDC
Dn
oC
n
""-"Z7
Figure 16.
'-40
'top
'top
\J9.
"tt~ov.
1987)
A:
L.
NPR - 3.23
Axisymmetric, #72
. Axisymmetric, #75
Rectangular, #71
* Rectangular, #85
.050P(RMS)
Figure 17.
.025-
..
0
200
400
600
Q, psI
800
1000
It-t1I)FIU.L
f..
"-,W
6-9
the value of retaining such a device for production aircraft
01
10"
-120k
10"
Shock
Separated
flo
noise
(90', 0'.24,
L)
0.20
10,
101
M -
:M1.19
a =0
PSI RMS = 1.51 E-02
10
10".
-.
10k 20k
1k
100
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 1.
"
--.-
Figure 20.
.011
CD, .
nacelles
.010
Shock Noise
7
NPR
'---.
.009
0 ,
~.6
.008...
Ouler
Figure 21.
r0s
)
- rrmthe
V~c~i
"
.2
.4
.6
.8
1.0
F li g h t Mac h No.
[ igljrt
.9
0.
.8
M**
performance penalty associated with removal of
"outer flaps
4.
'
.7.
2.4
Spporated Flow
C
1-))
p
FLAPS REMOVED
"X
6-10
duration of the
test
flight program.
2.0
within one hour of test time. The model scale vane loads
1.5
15
Dynamlc
Load
1.0
Water cooled
.5
pressure transducer
0(0
1
Thrus
vectoring vanes
Figure 24.
Figure 22.
5.
JL 841 Baseline MilPow.r
160
's0 -both
-
lFigures
145
S140
170 -
2
3
4
Nozzle pressure ratio
SUPERSONIC ASTOVIY
120
110 -1
Preliminary Data
los
10from
Frequency. Hz
Figure 23.
t-
7-
,-,
1
--
1-t0o
.
Figure 25.
AV.-F1
__
__ 1
153'
143
1.10
6-11
AV.8B
-Nozzles
Aft
1314
132 1128
120
1167
160
156
152
148
147
Figure 26.
5a
146
AV-8B cruise dynamic pressure load levels.
A.
n= 1,2,3...
(12)
Figure 27.
160
NPR = 3.1
55
"D 150
-J"
5b
iT
S*In
"< 145
NPR
1.7
A
140
ol
Figure 28.
"-
12
HID
135
18
24
160
S NPR =3.1
155
0 150
Figure 30.
Q-
itoward
%0/
NPR
"2
< 145
0
In,
140
135
1)
12
II / 1)
18
24
6-13.
jet, by themselves, raise serious concerns regarding reliability
and durability of many large fuselage components that would
be impacted by the plume,
10
15
20
25
maximized.
FREQUENCY (kHz)
Figure 31.
6.
For the engine nozzle outer divergent flaps, twin jet plume
resonance (i.e. jet screech) dominated the loads spectrum at
low flight Mach numbers for the B-11, but the convection
of forebody separated flow into the twin engine nacelle
afterbody dominated the loads spectrum at higher flight
Mach numbers. The problem was found configuration
dependent, in that the swept forebody vortex never entered
the nacelle afterbody of the F-15 aircraft based on flow
visualization experiments at model scale. The thrust
vectoring vanes of the F-18 HARV experienced the highest
dynamic load levels of all configurations examined,
amplitudes were found to exceed 1.5 psi-rms with a 20"
thrust vector. The non-vectoring vanes were found to be
exposed to levels in excess of either shock or eddy Mach
wave sources. The most probable cause for this was
attributed to impingement noise from the thrust vectoring
vanes. The supersonic STOVL configuration was found to
be dominated by noise associated with jet impingement,
dynamic load levels reached 160 dB SPL on aerodynamic
control surfaces. The cruise mode for supersonic STOVL
was found to be of severe concern, since practical
configurations with small noz7le to fuselage separation would
suffer severe scrubbing by the jet plume. Levels as high as
174 dlI SPI1 were observed.
In general. the aeroacouslic scientific community has not yet
reached a stage where prediction of the dynamic load levels
and particularly the loads spectrum with source coherence is
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6-14
6.
20.
7.
21.
8.
9.
to.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
I1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
I9.
1)
7-i
SUMMARY
The Wright Laboratory is the Air
Force center for air vehicles,
responsible for developing advanced
technology and incorporating it into
new flight vehicles and for
continuous technological improvement
of operational air vehicles.
Part
of that responsibility is the
problem of acoustic fatigue.
With
the advent of jet aircraft in the
1950s, acoustic fatigue of aircraft
structures became a significant
problem.
In the 1960s the Wright
Laboratory constructed the first
large acoustic fatigue test
facilities in the United States, and
the laboratory has been a dominant
factor in high-intensity acoustic
testing since that time. This paper
discusses some of the intense
environments encountered by new and
planned Air Force flight vehicles,
and describes three new acoustic
test facilities of the Wright
Laboratory designed for testing
structures to these dynamic:
environments.
These new test
facilities represent the state of
the art in high-temperature, highinteneity acoustic testing and
random fatigue testing. They will
allow the laboratory scientists and
engineers to test the new structures
and materials required to withstand
the severe environments of captivecarry missiles, augmented lift
wings
and flaps, exhaust structures of
stealthy aircraft, and hypersonic
vehicle structures well into the
twenty-first century.
1.
Introduction
nccLlbIdcuufinp Notwillc
t (!I Ac usmi ldcialih on Aneincg S~itccittintCh i cc
~4,
Atcy 199
7-2
3.
Acoustic Environments of
Missiles in Captive Carry
7-I
I
7-4
7-5
The sound-pressure-level
capabilities of various test
organizations is shown over forty
years, in psi on the left scale and
In this
in dB on the right scale.
figure, WL indicates the Wright
Laboratory, MDAC is McDonnell
Aircraft Company, and IABG is the
German facility near Munich.
The psi scale shows how intense the
noise levels are in the new Wright
The
Laboratory test facilities.
Combined Environment Acoustic
Chamber ir designed to achieve a
noise level of 180 dB, or nearly 3
If this
psi, on the test specimen.
energy were concentrated into one
frequency of, say, 100 Hz, it would
correspond to a fluctuating load of
1700 pounds of force over a twofoot-square test panel, reversing
from +1700 lbs to -1700 lbs one
Such
hundred times per second.
levels show the intense accustic
environments that must be withstood
by modern flight structures.
References
1. Bianchi, R.A., Bradshaw, R.T.,
Farrell, J.H., and Reed, R.E., 1962,
"Survey and Evaluation of Sonic
Fatigue Testing Facilities," US Air
Force Aeronautical Systems Division
Technical Report ASD-TR-61-185.
Kolb, A.W. and Rogers, O.R.,
2.
1962, "The Aeronautical Systems
Division Sonic Fatigue Facility,"
Shock & Vibration Bulletin Nr 30,
Part V, pp. 37-50.
Kolb, A.W and t4agrath, H.A.,
3.
1968, "RTD Sonic Fatigue Facility,
Design and Performance
Characteristics," Shock & Vibration
Bulletin Nr. 37 Supplement, pp. 1741.
7-6
I JET VORTEXES
II JET MIXING REGION
III FLUCTUATING LIFT i SCRUBBING
IV TRAILING EDGE VORTEXES
V COMPRESSOR / TURBINE
VI SLOTS
VII BOUNDARY LAYER
160
~I
"o
150
C'),.
130
1000
100
FREQUENCY, Hz
10
____----
Lwi
SCALE
SMALL
Hpi4
, :'
Wright
=
~l
m
2g~r'.
'Ib Wright lI traitory Sir turiunal)yI tI..% l'auhty
7-7
180
LAU
100 LAUMCH901
A 0004&ATO
z0
,memasvr
60
Kwv
1500
140
30 50
100
200
5000
FREQUENCY IN Hz
X ACHIEVED
-GOAL
.AKEOFFci
T-gr
AIRThcmlEMPERATURESto
ihLitDVL
OA
7-8
02.
N2 , He
PURPOSE
e DESIGN VERIFICATION FOR
COMBINED ENVIRONMENT TESTING
COMBINED ENVIRONMENT
TESTING OF SMALL STRUCTURES
ACOUSTIC
TERMINATION
HEAT
'
SOURCE
CAPABILITIES
0 180dB SPL
9 50 - 300 Btu/ft'sec
* 12"x 18" PANEL, MAX
\'lr
TEST PANEL
4 AIR
MOOULATOR
ACOUSTIC
SOURCE
ACOUSTIC
HORNS
Fi:urc 6
SubI-Fkiciet Acuuo
(.'hwricr
7-9
i.ST SECTION
180 diB SPL
3000OF
ACTIVE COOLING
MUFFLER
HON
&ORW LATOR
ACOUSTIC SOURCE
12 AIR MODULATORS
50 - 1,500 Hz
*
*
UNIQUE CAPABILITY
EXPLOITS NEW TECHNOLOGY
t~igurv 7
inlil| Au'i.|
("hiiiiIlr
s
0
u
N
0
p
R
E
s
180
WL
2.5
(GOAL)
WLg
U
N
SWrL
U
R
E
E
v
L
,5
LNORTH
LTV
AMERICAN
a
0.5
NASaD
1955
a LOCKHEED
DOUGLAS
1965
IAG
I
1960
17
170
NORTHROP
L
E
MDAC.
160
I
1970 1975
1980 1985
1990
YEAR
I-igum I9 lilh Incntity A.oustw Testing Capahilitici
1995
G. BayerddrfeL
L. Freyberg
Industrieanlagen-Setrisbsgssellschaft m.b.H.
Kinsteinstraae 20
85521 Ottobrunn / GERMANY
3. FACILITY DESIGN
Aetrothermal environments are composed of vibroecoustic and thermal loading& of varying
severity. In designing a test facility it is
essential that a wide range of load combinations becomes available. This can bait be
achieved if the thermal and acoustic loads
are generated independent from each other.
1. suNN"IrF
Aerothecrmal environments as encountered
during the mission% of reusable spacecrafts,
hypersonic vehicles, advanced launchers etc.
are the major design driver for an advanced
Thermal Protection System (TPSI technology.
In developing such materials and structures
ground testing under simulated operational
conditions is of eminent importancec.
In$order totmeet these requiremeints IABG has
designed a thermoacoustic facility which was
recently put into operation. The facihity is
clpab;e to produce surface temfereturell up to
1300
at sound pressure level Sup tt;160
dl. The design erproaeh and operational aspeels from test Work performed so far are
descr ibed.
2. INTRODUCTION
Apart from analytical methods Such as FINcalculations ground test facilities are an
indeepenisibie tool fot the development of
TPS-hordvore tRef 1.2). Though It is not
possible to simulate oll the different environatinto to which TPS-Gystems may be osposed during their operational life in only
one single acility, It io still good pfactire to coobtine such loadings which develop
strong interactions.COTL
LMS
AFtLMS
PAESSE
PNEYTM
CNRLNDRT
suRFACE TENP.
FATIGUE LiFE
OERATION
GODMDR
wnas.560 OC
POOR
1XPE9'#5IVE
)1300
C
No PRUO"SLN
CNIAP
Nainly because of the Whoghe surface temperatures end the simpler overall design It was
decided to go festthe flametsyatem.
FIt. I Shows an arayo nine burner: which
ar
one
nball pvote to aoyo indlvIdlual adjustment. The burners are driven with
NeIthan 1CM
a nd Oxygen (0
whereby each
burne he& AIteseparate contr~l walves
AEF'TNERN41AL CVALLINOES
ASCENT
PSOPULSION SYSTEM
Radiaited noi**
Radilated *eat
its
AgRooYNAMic EFFECTS
Separated Flows
Aercodynamic Neeting
CRUISE
AERODTNAAIC EFFECTS
boundary Loaye Noise
Aerodynamic Ninrting
REENTRY
AERODYNAMIC EFfECTS
boundary L..Separated Fl.
Aerodynamic Neeting
fe
Svee$*ot
it remarkable
t
to
0 moderete
Pgrre'~~~~~~~~~t,,I0411
r.~r.iri~n i h'r
44 'arI.rl
1-1q. I
Arlily of Burrners
sr
etAryr
toalf Slimu
titiers
flrld rinh
~iotoAmmag
. Ntrnn,',nr
AUsiIVWA
fig. 2 ,
ame sensors on top of each row
ontrol -orrect burning, in case of irtegularities
e relevant valves will shut down the
gas sup
y.
Spark plugs for each row allow
ignitioi. so that the flame unit can be fully
remote controlled,
S'
r~
batincacvobei
as
seabled
The
o7
.
Vaggt
ao FyIv1 thep
follower
ofe
Instrumentaione
_f the
Probe fIcclcphonls
facility
consists
Mot tonen
SIUi/T3s? 5SIC?.
OASPL at A.?.
FIQJIgfCY
NUZ
3,
FLUX
O.APL
AT
sis
IS
100 142l1
Il.At.
SUIF&CIt Tt"P.
aes.
Igk
110
d
kil
C
rg
v~ceaera
Samcl 10 do
50 ;,1 tklt
mae.l+
se
i
ma . 1)O0
the
leveerttioa
chasbo
to
is
sy
"-
"
T**;.te
1fecnce
rpattae Of the bulneel
end
outlfol the febts
aW.,ut of the ionotstolo. ?he pleobe alle.
phone*s
n be used in temperatutq fields up
to '00 gC.
they allow direwt meaffurements of
the
fluctuatiry9
pressures within., 0 tae
hot
lOne.
?of
tecpelrtuuel beyond '00
C dirett
se'tlovin,j of
the dynamic pteose..c
is not
possible.
In
such cases the date
-ro* the
reference microphones htve to be scaled down
according to the change of $eneity Letwoeen
cold and hot 4O0`e.L
Tempepature
leaurtements
age
taken
via
Mounting of the teat specimen into the tharmoscoustic PWT needs a dedicated design. The
specimen shall be supported as for its
intended use and care should be taken to allow
for
thermal
expansion.
If
necessary
the
mounting frame
can be additionally
cooled
with water.
4. OPIRATIWK&L ASPECTS
In order to iilustrate
the operation of the
facilities
two different
tests
which have
been rocently performed ate described.
ARIANE S Tank Insulation
The European launcher ARIANE 5 presently in
the final development stage is depicted in
Fig. 4. The tank marked with an arrow contains Helium and is covered with flexible inCulation materiel to protect it against the
heat radiated by the engine of the cryogenic
main stage. The insulation is equally exposed
to the high noise levels at lift-oft
and to
turbulent flows at transonic lspeds. In order
to verify that the surface of the tank structu'e will
not be subjected to temperatures
above SO C as well as to qualify the
nmauletion with respect to the turbulent pressure
field a thleroscoustic teat was performed.
ir, 5
ThVrnIO"
oustic
lost
The teadings of these microphones are pieSented in Fig. 6. The upper part cntsins the
spectre as oe&Sured under MT. Thet* are cottain differences in the frequenries up to
lbS
Os
and
beyond
400
Ns.
however,
the
OASPL-vale is the ease fo( the pfobe microphone ar4 the average Out of the fout control
microphones.
i iq.
S-:I
ml
ARIANE
5-1muncrierv
80
as specificd.
fl
TPS
In
the framework
of a study sponsored by
ESTEC (Ref 3) a multiwall TPS-panel was dowas used as a candidate
which
by
DASA
veloped
The TPS-panel is
for a thermoacoustic test.
It
considered to be taken from a reference vehithe arrow indicating the refercle (rig. 8),
ence location.
i f -- ....-- -
(1g. b
AcousLtic Spectrrai
a smonitoted by the-
. .
Fl~
hlwteialain.Z
of the tank
...
Jvr-4i~rtorr Curves
I',.
1.5PSPel
Akr~f jwed~emente
-1 the thermoacouett.; featiThe developent
f1u
ty was enponaced by the Un4wunemntiote
Terhnoloqie
iSHMnT On4 the
Fotachuna Ynd
geumtehst-Ange~eefifto
Aqentut
halt#0 IDAA whvr'ch is highly appIeCISaed.
"tluteche
G.
o.volops-nt
of i Traosasti
teet
Facilit y
tSA-Cnfete-ne *$paerielt 3trokturee and
mechafnical Testin*. orlob
1954
9-1
R.G. White
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton
Southampton, S09 5NH, UK
SUMMARY
INTRODUCON
of excitation.
Pn.~rwtnIm,u u .5sftgwi s
,,a
'
,n
.*Snamit,'/
wvd in I4all.hqu.
9-2
BACKGROUND
Various design guides ror predicting the
acoustic fatigue life of metallic and some
composite plate-type structures using semiemperical mathematical expressions and
design nomographs have been developed (Ref
1). The predictions are based upon assuming
the fundamental mode as the controlling
parameter which simplified the analysis.
Miner's law and cumulative damage theory
and a range of experimental results from
various structures were utilized. Design
guides were continued, such as those of the
Engineering Science Data Unit (ESDU) in
London, UK, and updated periodically for use
in the government and aerospace industry,
Some acousitc fatigue design characteristics
for composite materials have been developed
using the single-mode assumption, semiempirical formula established from a statistical
analysis of a range of experimental test data
(Ref 2). The importance of multi-modal
effects was observed in tests involving higher
excitation levels (Ref 3). Although the above
methods include nonlinear effects up to the
limits of the test facilities used, there is a
growing interest in higher sound pressure
levels and anisotiopic materials,
A series of experimental investigations were
conducted usiza beams and plates to
understand the nonlinear dynamic behavior.
Clamped aluminum alloy and carbon fiber
reinforeced plastic tCFRP) beams, pinned
beams, and clamped plates were investigated,
Linear mode shapes and nonlinear
displacement shapes were studied.
The
response due to random excitation was
investigated. For forced vibration studies of
beams, electromagnetic coils and annular
permanent magnets were used. For the plate
studies, a large vibration shaker and acoustic
progressive wave tubes (APWT) were used.
More details can be found in References 4 and
5.
Both C-C beams exhibited a slight frequency
shift and peak broadening. Bistable response
(jump phenomena) was obtained with
sinusoidal excitation ef both types of
-I_
9-3
9-4
It f.
G.(fj
4C'
where o is the static stress, G, (Qf) is sound
power spectral density, f, is resonant
frequency, is damping ratio, and t is time.
This equation uses only the first mode
response and assumes that the static and
dynamic deflected shapes are identical and
that the acoustic pressures is in phase over the
whole panel. The first, third and fifth
vibration modes seemed to be the predominate
modes found from the results of the acoustic
progressive wave tube test of plates.
Assuming the first, third and fifth modes are
the major contributing sources of response, an
extimate of the total mean square stress may
be expressed as:
,'
A~A)
.~
AOCA);
;,w Itr00)
the second modes and 618 and 864 liz for the
third modes.
Sine dwell aluminum alloy plate tests were
conducted near the fundamental frequencies
]EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
Base excited shaker testing of clamped plates
provides a convenient method of studying the
geometric nonlinear response since it provides
response transfer functions from well defined
forcing functions. Modal coupling and the
transfer of energy from one mode to another
are important aspects to modeling the forced
9.5
9-6
References
.QN ,LUSI.N
1.
A comparison betA.ecn the aluminum
alloy plate
sinusoidal response around
response around the fundamental modal and
that of the CFRP plate indicated a greater hard
spring nonlinearity in the CFRP plate. The
nonlinear displacement shapes extended over
a greater frequency range than the CFRP
plate.
2.
The CFRP plate randomly excited
exhibited a greater number of modal response
frequencies and more peak broadening than
that exhibited by the aluminum alloy plate.
The fundamental nonlinear modal response of
the CFRP plate contributed more heavily to
the overall response spectrum than the
aluminum plate.
3.
The contribution of higher order modes
of plate response is greater as the level of
excitation increased.
These should be
considered in future prediction models.
.4.
S.
Wolfe, H. F.
and White R. G.,
"Experimental studies of the nonlinear
dynamic behavior of clamped-clamped
aluminum and carbon fiber reinforced plastic
beams at large dcfle1tcions". 1993 15th AIAA
Acroacoustics conference, Long Beach. CA,
AIAA 93-4336.
6.
Wolfe. H. F.. and White, R. G.,
"Experimental and analytical studies of
nonlinear displacement shape of three straight
beams:
clani 'd-clamped aluminum and
carbon fiber reinforced plastic beams and a
pinned-pinned aluminum beam". Strucra
Dynamics: Recent Advances. Proceedings of
the Fifth International Conference. July 1994
(to be published).
Ibrahim. R. A,. "Nonlinear random
7.
vibration experimental results and research
needs",
Structural Dynamics:
Recent
Advancs. Proceedings of the Fourth
International Conference. July 1991, Elsevier
Applied Science. London and NY ISBN 1.852660670.-2, pp 58-83.
9-7
-8.
4Advances
pp 8-104
2660-70-2
11.
S.
and
Fg1VbainSae
Fg1VbainSae
Woinowsky-
etPaeIsalto
etPaeIsalt~
-Old_____________
14
all*
0.4
.TOTAL
.0
00
'
3j
I.d
--
ACIL
* -A'C
IIU%
1 46?14 R.n
Ron2
49
00
ogi
00ini
MediumNgh level)
At
RD
0
10.6
00--
ST
~A
*'si*,a~...,.
0.0
40
0.
200(
-0.2
0 2
10
12
EXCITATION
(gow
rowe)
080 4
0
..
~.a
~.
0-
g.o$o
14
OISP
- -~
40
s0.0
T 0
,Z
00
0.2
6
a
10
EXCITATION
(g'snmi.
TOTAL.
A~aAL
-,-
12
14
30-
1s8
0
SENDMI
DoPCB4TRE
W , 424 7011
,,
0.2
---
OA
0.8
DISPIAcEM ENT (mm rms)
-G02
S~i
W0
S03
IIS04
SC? Pad, -
,,'ioa,.,,
5,3 514
1,U..t
R.,
Ati~l
(1-;
R,,a2o_ At ile,i
1L.
Fi
Strin
Auinu
Plat
pcrlDniis
G2
~*' i
,.i
adm
0.8
tanSeta
AxaBnigLwLvlanoAuiu
Plate
esteS
,Ttl
(1.
1-1
-)
oI.
0SGS
;,.~~~C2
iI
0;?;i,;
--
.)
9-g
vhliliAI Till
1,
lDe nsit
4e4r
oe, A 2u To t al
..
.e'
447. H2
I
.Sine
oiS
6
1003
M0I
l-"
'
M
167.7 H
,T ,,.,'''
Al.,l
,,
00
0
S
.
.
R a nd o m , A lu m in u m P la t e
.*
Plate
Fig 12 Integra'
M
A S -Tt )2>
VITIy
AFi g, 0
Al l ine
44.)lALlA,,"
iLM, - II
0 .6
~
P
GS
R
T 2,O
3004
Tm
,
-0.2
12
14
-0
2
ECITATION
s rm)
..
Sso04
M-SP
Random
Fig 14 Excitation vs Strain and Displacement,
solo
CFRP Plate
S0
6
EON
200
AXIAL
DISP
9-10
*
m
o-
2-
3s, 910
k1PU
''
'
Ri-
GCf
199
1.1
IV'
400~
0
S
30D~
3,3
41
9:02.7 IMUS
'*i
0.6
0Pft~
0A 0.
Rion.35
G/IPnA~n
VIN
VViPOUFTEP PUS
1997
I P.
1 39
09230 Po19
0 75083
Ronh
'
0903187
R.n
192.
/
;i/F919
/11 TIGb
low9i-e)
.-.... o
RM9990,9~PS
- 57.11949
*0
Is%
fl~CFt*
Plate
PUS
t84,223
-351
910
,
.9
R., '0
Ron- .0/
/F
Ci90
1,9lo9ni
ndot91..
i
19919
97oeQ
9A- I
F.morgarti,
H.Cn1a1rirrei
Lit
symb
o
lsIli(]
Listiifsimbolsir-iil
A,,: aicniist ir w;veleiigt.lu
raeisverswal
heiulii wrwvraveliigtlu]tsnutia
IlteiiVcl
w: frequenicy (luiniii variable
02 : iliagoliarl tiiAtrix of thle squamre-d eigenivaluis
q(w): geiieralizedi coordiiiuntes vector
Q: eigeim-ivcor muatrix
aiss
A-15(w): ofqnivalentl air
G*,,(w): raidiationi dlaminiug
I/1(w): compilex fref-uieiicv tesponise
S,i (w): acce~lerat.iiii IP)
si,mw: l'sf) of ieii griieralizeil acouistic. iiipirt
Sp (w)
ConrVI'lti.
1 -
Introduction
ithe
eci for Aluamciratle modal basis lip to 2000
117.,aiuil it, must, lie sulitaIble for Green's fiticimtioii
Special at~uimt iii nuimst, lie (arnd
uleterminaiii'tnii
~ fsmdl)J1jIfo
pi tpr thejfe-iZe of (lie linut and( toi theIf
boiniiiiaty roiiuitions ini orider to obitaini suifficientfly
represeit-n ti ye innoies at hiighi frequiericies Ioo. 'T'he
responsiie of the1 st-riuctluire is t.Inis, cakulated coosi durizog mu
ra iii orii(tCSiire fi eldmw i hi cot tel alionl
given biy coliercuice fuiiit-ioiis validl ini a revrrlier-
anut
iiviroiiniieit,.
As sa iid, t-lii e efec
.rif
r i a it is sin iida lei tC oi igli
(.11
Presented at a Svnuiposininr on 'Inract of Acoustic Load~s an Aircraft Structures' held in Lillehrenriner. Norway, May 194
--
9A-2
TIhe rensc'n" fur I ice rh niv
ccima described alcove
Arr c' sse~lin~cll of ac prndiicccl kill(; they nre nlimiel
(where k
fucto
-wave
htw
poinits c.nnf
I.o
otctailiiig cill
elflriri'ct meth~lod, miliiimizioig mmilpciting limce, mind takiing advantahge from i"EM%nodrIs nl rendy lisec ciIri iig I he cteve'lopi
iwo t. cof I.li de-
l-
sign
Pi]
47irc'
I/?. -
Hn]I5
(1)
with r-= stait.e. vector, -mid Af,(C, R =Inn-ss, dniliping midIstiffmatrices res~pectively. By jintroducing
Ilie imodlal matrix Q nod( thue vertor of nuodal amiiplitch'sv
q(t), nod ntcitig Fouirier 's t~raisforoc of
1),we have tlip equiiotlic of t(lie stru~ir
llr (iiite
(I?)
D/7 + ic~dn
-~
son rce
con figiirat~ions of (fihe
For soimei speciali
tHip coinpoicewt.asociat~ed with tin suirfcccc' integin! disnppears, micd ani explicit, expression for the
p)ressure, filed ill ternis of acgiven sutrface acceleraLion is obtitiieil as:
P fR)
qj jc-
-pf
R~ i(1
~I
(7)
Isn
Foir
allinint
flna
siirrre
1,(1?) = 2 p/
(2)
hhscnle
wiln
cI
d,5
icrcc
(8)
Q7()
-Q7'Th,,(w)
+ Q"*Tin(w)
p)
pies
rvnd-
2
V VT
J
PRO,d~- W)
01()'
-21w,
A"c,
A,
n,,
(I))
9A.3
wherQ,,q..w),A,,is
6, = ~
te ccmen. sirroundig P',, and the intecgral appearing in Eq,(8)
has heen replaiedc by the corresponding sumnina-
at take off. TIhe response of the st-ructure is therefore essentially of a stat istical nature: N~., for the
acceleration PSI) (Power Spectra! Density) we hiave!:
tion with weights A,,, and the summation is extended over all thle points P,, into which t~hc system
hias beeim disc retize, I
Insert ion or t he above expression int~o the equat ion of mnot ion (2) yieldls:
+ jw((.,'+ Ca,(w)) +
.M(l
+-~(
(~j,:f
where:
S,;(w) =QJJ(w)Sj,(uw)IP(w)Qjr
=m
2PQ-r(;Q
Sg.(W~)
C.()-2pQ'j.G 1 Q
Cos kr,,,,
PWQ1XmXnW)
2
SP,(W).
(W)
fl
'Rsinl
krptly,
Randoin inputs
Ratidiii
(14I)
aniid A... aniid A,, are the surface elemeit ts releva ut.,
t.0 thie poitits x.. an xii
,, respect ively.
As is seen, miid as said above, thle effect, of thle
air is tIt
faiaddms AA i~ I o de
dlaminilg (C]").
The frequency responise (or, better, the traitsf,'r functijon of t he st mect ire) is thlerefore:
)2 [-w2(l+A1,(u.))-2jw4C.+C,(
(C1),,, A,,,l,471I'mn,,
A,,sin krm,r,
(C1,,,, A,, ,41rr,n,,,
f+)d2
11(u)
(12)
iiipiul
9A-4
A%
anl example, Fig. 2 provide~sa typical acousspectrum for the firing of Arianie '. T'he spectral denshity of the inlput, isshJown ill Tab. I.
tie
Illustrative examples
Illu~strative tests were. worked out, for a rect.ngulIar hion cycomli alu ninutm plate with flexuiiral
suprand torsional restraint. Th'le data are re-
Ga
~Honeycomb type
thickness
height
QPanel lenght
-Panel width
-Skin
fHoneycomb
~Thh.2
INTEG~T~tEVE*
INERTEOD LEE 1~la42
dB
-~
ot
st
ness
mutch as possible.
euecmuigtnca
(ii) to have
lip to
1000] 1z;
tic input..
FF
.
2.0
-7-
~O(,.
4
_14.
ot,.l
,stt~ir
w1
qliencv.
9A-5
iiWnel
Numerical
Analitial mfndei
34.
344
1134
95 5___________
1351)
169.3
16141
2190
1356
69)not.
1699
221r.
21l____________)___
2344i
2815
21t55
2%55
im9.7
V12
Ide
.5.11(I
ii
421t6
45
4771
47.%
5224
5 i
______
9
1________________
471%_____
A"
5r914
35931
694
5q
6440
4
-09-9-
7031
___0____
71901
79.15
793IX
M,2
--
--
6 _______
7W2
792
rom a response
_________________ S
with increasing M1rucftoral mass, and] wit It increasing frerrten cy. Aliso radei at ion dlaimping is sI ron gly
afr-fectd by thei q1 mfl itural miiss; it. b'comiesi Iart~icnilarly active ;it. iteirilnn/nigii frequenricies.
.-i9-1
_______9__
Inoan in crease of
a!
c anarid iiiioni
or iofk1%audto
i
412 _______________
4129
III
47
________
viewpoint.,
cronsirlerat.ion of
Fig.4 de~scribes the' variat ion or time. first. six eliagollill delement~s of t1ile mat,1
rix M 0 w;Fig.5 sh~ows
I lin arnalogolls values for fthe matrix C(9(w).
illu~stmirgie' sonic quantities fror 0111cr cases.
l-'ig,.l
Fig G3
Fig-3 Grid
it%"[
in the' anilysis
9A-6
-Conclusions
fuse Sound
(i) The behaviour of very light structures for
saeapplications can ieanalyzed with good
accuracy with tile method prescnted in this
paper.
r
stjItsshow thle imiport an ce of t he
(ibtaiitr)
presencre of air; neglecting it may lead to alltrf
overestiutal ion of the response.
(iii) Niinierical simiulat ions have providedi results
in good agreement withIi le experimental restilts.
(iv) L.i nut at ions of t hie mtethod arise front:
(a) at very low frequiencies the size of tile
panll" is of t hie order of magnitude of tile
acottst ic load, and t lie, panel cannot be
cotisidrered wxa' baffled'
(b) at htigh freijieticrie's local deformnatinns
arise t hat canniot be described by finite
letenetu t ect uiqiles;
(r)fr lt(It acoustic itio' deing a htighly fine
rus~h is w-re-sarv.
References
[11 It. If. Lvoti. 'Statistical Analy-iis of
Plower Injrection and fResponste in Structure's and Roonts,
Jouir. Acoust. Swoc.
[21 D. C. G. Eaton. "T7he Use of Reverberant
Hoomi Acotust ic for Spacecraft St ruct ures
and th-ir Payloads", ESA SP 321 (Oct.
1991).
(3] J. Fowler. "Effect of Air Mason Model
Test", ESA SI' 290.
141 L~ord Rayleigh. "The Theory of Souind".
[91
xenlVnls.[F9-8
91
*1
9A-7
--
0
000
LW
01
20
It,
II,
0I
0200
0?
000 -
.4,
0-
000
0002
02
*0
0
00
220
*1
000
02-
22001
-:
4202
II,
2,
01
ml-
o2
02
mi
0l
nIh
00'
02.1*
0
200
400
COO
SOC
1000
.-
,--
9A-8
-
-5---------- r
S5
n lI -- - - - - -
flllll
ILI'
I.
IS
00,
*4
500a
gI
rit4
5'
Oh,
I*
CCi
I0
554*4410
100I
Sl,
ou
il
VilN'tel,,m.og.
Iatm+
.s,,~l ttS.
iSl
5.1
9A-9
048
200
400
600
900
1000
0 06
002
0
0
T00
490
100
0060
06
04
02
m0
400
so1
too
4~ WARMIII0fl HIMIA#%hiIIAICIPIIIN11
IM 10 EW44-1111
Iwo
9A-10
_____
-0-0-- ---
221 DOF'1
ENOORE-SPI.MAym.M00 CRI0'
#.MS.
(@I1'54.3111
-----
2000~
s-
~fig.?
low
3Dp______m_
__
A~f.110
9A-11
SENSORE.SpL
3.000
_____
_____
_____
2.000
_____
0:900
__
:0000
3.000
R. M.S.
q"
36 99
a8300
0.000
00.04~~~i
0303--
UR.
A.-.
-st 1MI
9A.I12
Pin
MAIH.eO00
SENSO0E-SPL
.0000
325 DnF,3
P.M.
~~
.3
____
3.0002.000
--
0.00
0003
000*0
-41
5- 1-j3;--~
--
3--fli -ihsl
lot
fai
mil
ol lilt Air
film")
-tvit
9A.13
4*
00
04I S(4,0''
~~~~IU~~~~
------ __
_-_
.0:00.-------
No0
---
.---
~t,
.44
0040
60o
--
Filt-in
,,lli
44 *gii
401!(Owl,
I.144
~ ~
__
IN ITEI) STATFS
u.v
SUiMMARY
A brnef review is presented of work by the authors to
provide an engineering prediction technique for
power intensity Irma fluctuating pressure) and power
spectral density (PSO) for attached and separated
compressible flow.
The review process almo
considers recent shocklturbulent boundary layer
interaction work conductod at the Univcr%,i~y of Texa~s
at Mach 5. It is shown that prediction techniques are
hampered us the result of the requiremnent to know
panmecters of flow interactions a prion; in particular,
the choice of charaoctenstic length and velocity scales.
A technique is presented, based on the Houbolt
spectra aturumption, that appears to provide
engtinoenal solutions to the design resoalution of
complex flow piroblems. The method is based oin a
first mnomenit typ~e
of PSD lf.s0(l)/(fiA)21Ithat has a
fixed value for antached and separated flows.
Moreoover, when applying the concept with the
Houbolt spectra, an excellent comparison ii sihown to
PSD data for shockiturbulent boundary layer
inercton.e
directions
V
X'y
characteristic velocity
coordinate distance in streamn and
Spanwi~se direction respvctively
al
vhock generator angle
3Q
inviscid oblique shock
aJ.
separation line angle
I
ratio of spccific heats, 1.4 10r air
r'
intcrnititcrncy
60
boundary-lakyer disiplacemnent
thicknerss
compression ramp swept angle
paosrieter defined in Eq. (15)
coorrection to swept shock, Eq. (9)
0
shock angle b&%cd
on swept %hock/
boundary -layer interaction. Eq 19J)
O(s.)~l) power spectral dens~ity
Subscript,%
aw
c
LA~tf Sjbu
I
w
w
I
fh
K
k'
L
M
P.
F.
adiabatic wal!
contprcssible conditions or %Ap
corner angle
evaluated at edge of boundary la~cr
incomporesible conditions
reference ito calculated iii~owid shockk
poition
wall
approach flows up'trcam ot
interaction
%
hockjfhoundjrs -laver inieracii,.
region, peak, Plateau
tre tra .ondition%
PP rus
q
r
fluctuating pressure
dynamic pressure. (9y2)PMturtsulent recovery factor. 0.896
,,
440
s,
A'
4,
1'
.,sa,
"1
e Air noto
si .Niflosot~es hldls too Lllriimmet,.,
ii
t.4(3
Ai
I V5
10
INTRODUCTION
The ability to predict fluctuating pressure and power
spectra in supersowic/hypersonic turbulent boundary
layer flow has relied on ad-hoc techniques developed
from a database generated on planar, twodimensional, or axisymmetric shapes. Experiments
have led the way to investigate the phenomena due to
restrictive assumptions and limitations in analysis.
"The algorithms developed to date are generally for
attached turbulent boundary layer flow where a
reasonable database exists for supersonic/hypersonic
flow conditions. Moreover, the configurations from
which this database has been generated consist of
rigid structures (strategic/tactical weapon systems)
which are capable to reacting to high pressure and the
low and high resonant frequencies associated with
these loads. However, future space transportation
will require configurations that feature control
surfaces as well as ramps and inlets required for an
airbreathing propulsion system where the engine is an
integral part of the airframe. These structurem will
require large areas of flat panels which are generally
less efficient to pressure loads and low resonant
frequencies due to reduced stiffness. Furthermore
these lifting body configurations will feature complex
3D flow associated with the control surfaces as well
as a multitude of shock/boundary layer interactions as
well as shock-on-shock problems that can have a
significant impact on the dynamic and strength
charactenstics of the vehicles structure. Finally, the
mission profile for these types of systems will be
more demanding than that expenetK,,d by modern
fighter aircraft or ballistic and maneuvering ,eapon
systems from which the current databas. and
prediction techniquea were developed. Figure I
shows a typical hyperonioc configuratiol featuring 3D
tctrol
nsm-'ircular cruas-asctiona with ramps,
surfacea.
d regions where sh.kiboundary and
shock-on-shock ntrmtioe can occur,
The objective of this paper is it) provi-le a brief
review of work developed by the authors to predict
the unsteady flow behavior of fluctuating pressure
asxcated with attsched an separated turbulent flo'w
conditions. The review will almo foicus on %,ork
generated in the past several y.earx on flow
Three excellent
interactions seiprarced flow).
reviews of the subject matter are provided by
Laganellh and Wolfe (Ref. I). Dollhng (Ref :). and
Laganellt el al (Ref. 3). In Reference 1. both
attached and separated flow r-,ult are discused.
T such that 4. at T
a P. In this manner a
significant database could be diawn upon involving
heat transfer in shock wave/turbulent boundary laver1
interactions. For this situation, augmentation factors
were approximated between peak rms pressure and
peak heating using the M :5 5 2D/3D database and
subsequently applied to the more extensive heat
transfer database for M > 5.
(O
1)
'l
wt
't
wt
't
pressure
() hr
() hr
edfnd
edfnd
sn h eiiino
,
sn h eiiino
i
6 (w~) tkw together %aiI Eq.
eut
eut
0ol/
~ k''111
%eenrilzto
as
aewt h
innt
whr
onaixinwsmde
ittednau
nbudr-ae
ae
IN))I
prsueI
edge conditions. EiquAtions%(I) and (3) ca~nthen be
writteti as
(4)/;V~.j
nm
T1hepredictioa n mthdx4loy foir aetoo
tencratei in attached and shock boLundar% 1laNer
turbiulent flow can be found in the recent
Lagafelli aW Wolfe (Ref. I). The attahed fi,%
techniques reasilied frum the earlier A,ifks if
lkansdars
L-1aganell at at (Ref. 7) while the s%&Xk
layer intaractisa tehniquies %velt ftrsvi piresnted inthe
Ittefereec 10. Foe coutinuity of the preseit Isaper.
0131111
Of tbO reAsIt Will he PrOMenid hers-in 11
haeus of the analuziys a th relaitionship beteween the
raw pressaww and FXIer spectra ws prvided by
11oubilit Itef. ?), Mi givest a discusioni
oft the
liouhttlt algritnhas said Ref. It pros-dide caltenele
details which arv engw-ruw in the present pap"s
lo
&As
)I:. e . w.-
~ ~
'o
10-_4
1
q
q21 0peaks
k 2_
q)V
q1J
Solutions are obtained using correlations developed
for the overall rms pressure for attached (References
1, 11, and 12) and separated flows (References 1, 2,
3, and 13).
ms Pressure Predictions
The overall rms pr.ssure for attached flows is given
as
(P/q)
0.061F,
(6)
F,~~
~
=1/
=
+ 0.22r ,-!
,y-l,2Me
I+r
;h
Fc=Cz/C=h*Ihe=i
(Ref. 15) compared compressicon comer and fingenerated interactions and noted that the rms pressure
for the latter where approximately one-half the
levels experienced for the former for a similar
approach flow and similar shock strength. The
interactions showed a strong dependence on the
intermittent characteristics that included the inviscid
pressure rise, peak rms pressure rise, pressure
gradient, and spatial extent of large amplitude
This earlier work has been
disturbances.
corroborated and/or expanded upon in a series of
-xperimenv. nerformed at Mach 5 (Ref. 2).
'P
- (f +
E sin` (I/M)
(9)
MI
(7)
(P/q)ow=0.006/[1+0.13M,2]
-re
(8)
(!1)
2yMI'sin:-(--)
W)#.M
(Pw,/
V.
(12)
I0 5
(Al) (anGP)
- r/t
-r')
(13)
10-6
ntation ofthc
)/(PoA) =
-/[1
+(Tr/2) 2f]
(14)
= 4 k'f/V
(15)
where
the
rms
pressure
i.e.
w
(w)dw, the
u
second integral is a higher order termn for frequency
>20Ktlz. If one considers a change in variable dz
pf'-f
de/i
then
A2
ib
(w)
dz
which
suggests
f0q = function
---
(P,,ILI
jL--J
(16)
Iv
write
e..ral characterishic
velocities
10-7
f...~~,./)p1 ~
where the left side of Eq. (17) has a peak value for
all values . This implies that the first moment has a
unique valus for all flow conditions attached and
separatnd, when using the Houbolt spectra. This
phenomena is shown in Figure 8. Also shown are
incompressible and compressible data for attached
flow conditions as well as peak values from a number
of experiments from shock/turbulent boundary layer
interaction experiments that include ramps (with
swept corners), cylinders (swept/unswept), and fingenerated interactions. The attached flow data show
a trend to the expression given by Eq. (17) while the
unattached flow provide for peak conditions at the
2
predicted value of f.0/(/)o(PA) =0.318.
Moreover the shape of the interaction flow conditions
is different than that of the attached flow conditions
(see insert from Ref. 13 for the various shock
generating geometries). Again one has the dilemnina
of knowing the frequency where the peak first
moment occurs that requires a knowledge of the
characteristic lengths and velocities,
RESULTS
If one is given a PSD distribution for any flow
condition, the subsequent overall rms pres-ire (Ao 4)
=anbe obtained by the usual integration process. A
value of the peak PSD, O(f), can be selected as well
Using Eq. (14) for the
u a peak frequency, f,
condition (v/2)' 1ff < < 1, where peak conditions
occur by #he Houbolt spectra, together with the
condition that
f,.'(4/(PoR) 2uO.3 18
(18)
(19)
O)f2l
D-[1
Boundary
Layer
Interactions-
Experiments in
'9
1*
"
10-9)
'
Black, T. J. "An Analytical Study of the
Measured Wall Pressure Field Under Supersonic
Turbulent Boundary Layers" NASA CR-888, April
1968.
.20
.,,.m
.16
.12
08
,..1
.04
STan, D.
0..
Rom
-1
-2
...
,. ,
.4.t-2 -20 41 .1.6-1. .12
X/60
sYM
A1
1
6 -
i , , ,
.O .&1 .0.4.Q2
ao
10
16
&6
20
3D
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
x8/6o
i
4
Cornw
Comprsitomn Surface
Flow
SokLa~l
~I
Shock/Conmol SurtacedGape
ShoekJUOuedAu. LAyer
I0-I0
Database,
Database
/ -0.9
BLN|I
0.7
,
_
10
.-I
0
S-FkRP
FIN
aS0-3/4".
RAIAP 60:0
25"
o.
"2 (P.)P ,d
20
1.0
<3
"
0.6
0.4+
S0.3
1/2".4do 025"
0
:0o 0.
aA
a9
0,2
EOMI
SYM'. St
ff
O.
1.0 1224"'
REtF
06
1'-20- I
. Io 30
0.3
220'
2 I
WTCYL
91~
r0
3
0 '
0o-"
0'
2'D
20
D
16-8
b
.0
t.
10
20
..
30
40
50
,,
3Q
28
o0 ,
1O1
0 0,degrecs
0 0
16
21
17
.00 1.0
41"
0".IZ)'40.6'*
2,10
4 99
29
,I9
10o
Ii
X,
2D
2.9
'
20
20
r19
0 S,
S ym b ols id e nu fied
i Figure3 (a < 30-)
* s"
W4c6****0
- M
<> Ci n. F MW.
--
OC0
37
31
17
15
13
15
< 24*
RawP.M- S 1. 29)
1p MW, ,)
is)M 3,e,
e.l n.Wi),M.3(54.It)
Cmw.Raw. M-3 (Rol. Is)
k -60 6-24,
InceaiUmn
shock
Sgenerator angle (a)
3~
I
.2
I
.4
I
."
4
,
II
I0
20
30
50
60
10-11
0 20o
eqfN(Po,)
4
a'"
0 45
10
'*'
',
'0'"
Ia'
104lot
. j10,
10
020
l5
!6
SC..
24 R~mp,M-2(0.1 261
Ali.
M-: fR.l.3O).
S C., M-1I0
0 S.C.,
O
(RI..30.) All
& F.P., M-5.2 (R01,11. Ali.
S~
P, M- 10.4(Re|.31), All.
-F
0 45 Ranip.M -2hPlateau
Io00't
0'
'
10'
log
0',
to
to,
to,
to,
to,
Figure 6. First moment of PSD for attached and separated flow conditions
10-12
a) a=200, Ramp
O(j)UJq2%o
r10=
.2-\
attached flow
A
*"
s
"Sr=.72
"'
= separated flow
.23,
ttO"
boundary
.. ""
f
"
10 .\
V410"
tndsure
!
1,,
FREQ6.UENY.
,Uu SYMOL
(Ref. 27), M -3
FREQUENCY~. Hit
Figure 9. Comnparison or the PSD prediction technique
to MDal and 3D(h) interactions
1.
SUMMARYaffectecd
2.
INTRODUCTION
A methodxfAwv to predcict
the- oeeuttjr
-it .ur.InA11i11A
CARY~ iVA1W-,1l jet scRAech. 11ltimately AL11owrn3
th-'. P111,11aa
of
conhgutatrums. weiph will not rrsult in ,.crreh. sp I.-Ilmatc.~
Until now w~Ik-odof the Pcteech kvclsak loop hau.: foe u,*...t
on the prediction of the screech frtc.uvntv only. 'Ihisp. theampbtltud of pctevch. indicating the extent of pcwik lamaWeto the aircraft. has not been ptevivus-fy ptcdietc~l. I h-,
model dceseirdbe here has beena developud it.- p'tqed t the anitplit wk- at. well as the fiewlseacy of pct-eech. lhe on- Ih.
Ir. IL
An analytkal model bawsed
on result, ftrom analytical. ':,niand experimental rereatch. It ip te~igxn'.d to run
in a few peronds, on an exgihicerizt; workstation Puch that
'he mtjofI in'Iin~r
it can be sxsc.J bn a wmzrk design
corporate a Computational fluid Dynaaticu.. (-' D. input
interface aed a g~raphical analypip capability. A d'-s.rip.
tion of the wotks-tatiou model amwell ap an ezxample- of th.
Sc~reech pr-diction tresltv, for a given nozzle fivwhelI siLl ho
prfet.
i thspaPer.
01her na.Ahumnr spactxd twin-jet aircraft. su.:h a,- thc B-L the
'loriado and the: EL\ has. thec potenitial to be.Advcrs-el
~attribuattd
3.
PHYSICS OF SCREECH
Presenfe2 ar a Spnpciumn on 'Impact of Acoustic Loads ewrAirrraift Structures held in Liileharmner. Norway. May 1994.
1ons
...~
11-2
2
Mdu .0
130
110
M1=13
Scr~ch
Jjitto
NN"s
It
Componerd
70-
Fi~~urv~
6u
1:
scjttil
sol
I 11111I
0.3
Si..i u'iiti'et
.bv'r.e.u li . In'
tnl
iddi don"Aatcd
iiit~l~it ~.d.*114t
taIX.ft'
AS)h'
IhI'. ih*
fie~ttn pooint a
the'i..i
Imetbetwe. th. jet and th.: fre"rstream. Inaother
it i;- dri'.en k, s1'.el'.jn Hlm~nholtz tijwm inrtiability of
ti. '11.41 lm'.%r. 'Fhk inwabilit~y of the A.h-ar layer ab~o sem.iit, in Ilt:. produiction of turbukh'e which 6i rtvpowribk for
the. otht-t two-typem. of noine amsocialt'd with a jet. Jet mixitinx0.. andI 1ioadhand Phock am.-ociated noi- Jkt mixin*
nov-.
in both btiLrsuiti and rsuperrsomi jet-.. rersulta
the freentrcam.
.111(1
Hlb. lul
~~to
~
1,:t-1
u~rwa to preAhl nr..'I
-tt
m.iphl'btut'.
-%%Cragt.erice
1'ctulrt'A af jt
fII in nrkqthi mode viii
tiii.V di-AIn~lid Autiok 3.at ttrnn of iniperfeelI
hpi4al
xpa'ltii.'e jet.'.Io.:'r .io':'.sed itt tune. a jet in ne'h
kXhibil
0.1
Nom~arded Fmiqueficy.
.Ii.
aznpt iide. frfe1i~itc.,m
3.
fdNi
lion dlivtn b'l the, inbataIility mnode. ipstkisend.. h I'll t111shapme of the nOZAk 4xil Area. the' full)' C.xpandtA. Y-.t NMA'eh
nutmber and the no
plre?'eate ratio. 1for txAttij4t ,itigit
axiP.-yrmo.tric jo.'t andl low arspee ratitk z.e'monlul."zy J:l.%-2
hibit helical and1/or toroidAl motioui. &d-4,1ndmngOR 1imk. fol'.
.epawl-A Math number and nozzle Iprv.-4tmre rti" oflthe'rt.
Ililo.toualli. the mode typep have: been dep,%1nat-4 AL. A2.
B. C awl ) am iliwmtrat.il in Figure .; front N'outusil - or an
axityrnnetri
ould be repres.nti-A In the .'. Iahwis in I ixtert. .. '11". liefical spacial ntrwuxicur.neharakterii..I hv kmjtar wa%..kngtlm.
lower ftemttzeriy. waver. In f igurte .31thir--I
naia no-l woutld
be reprn-n-tled bi :1... 'B* typ. mod.'. In g.n.-al th.: k-b'al
rne~d renultn in the bWJae,-t r.'hAmniplitudten. In A M111111u1
mianner. !,ingie 2-I) jets and higha arqt... ratio r-rIdnyuLat
jets exhiubit a flappingt motion. driven 1hi
the. aht'utL inetii
mode, and can aito exhibit a %ynmmoric ni.1t. Gtittrallw
the flappiag mode, im,dominant for the 2-1-)jet at tyical
operating condition.'.
[ile amplitude ofncr...-eh for twin jets has been ,.howzt to bte
.tt3,ietaIl, gre:at"r thAn that for bingle je-tb. An example
--f thi.r, i:h own in Figure 31from Wa~wl wh.:rt: the' twin
jnei
y'r.blithl*i
jet dB Vvt]~ for *knign Nla.h 1.-1axi:-'rnmvtri't
un-lerexpan-.kd ii. over If' (IB great': r t han thfat for a minle
jrt The 'Instanit. lNOWnen the twinl jttr 1. 4t
aMCnli.
L1
mpact on the magnit Ukl of jet cel
.Iiriot"t.l~'
jet couplinx and thus. the xr-atet -ound pm,.-urt: i Itlali,'
11-3
Mods
L00,
CLDual
In
Ai*2
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
0a
C3,
ligiirt 3: ,,crv:<c
.ixL.viillilCtri
tic
0~ 0
ItziO~
20
60
4'0
FRIEWENICY
tiI
SO
too
-to'
4.
'[he .'crcech modeliv isan analytical itodel basecd onl the itsuitb fromt analytical, comnputational and experimental reillustrated ill Fig*-earch. The s-creechi prediction code. &%
urfe '>.is designed to rtin within a few sec~ond., oil ain eigincering worksation once tie flowficld ha.', been defined.
'Flit input to the code is%a CFD solutioni of tile jet-oil aircraft aft enld. Islginformation fromn thet CHI' soluition as.,
des-cribted fttrther below, tilt code proceeds throutgh the( [ouir
modules of the codet. each rersnigot
onotmtoffthe
screech mehns.'rlhe mlodules coitplete the calcuilationl
of the imtstabilitv wave-s. tile shock-vortex inttractiomi. tilt
acoustic feedback, andl tite receptivity. 'rite code's, priniar%
outtput are thle scleech freqItiency and aiipl.'ttide. 'ith codec
has beeni written itt a mo1dtilar structutre to allow each moud-tile to be eabily tipgraded asresearcht in each '2olioicil)Oit of
tie mechlanisni progressesC. 'The modtilarity abso facilitates,
sensitivitv studies to determine tilt impact Of OWe modu11le
on the predictions..
'rte
Mo&MI P4ASMD~sySi
........
Manus
AtSolotma
Supm9.nk:i
module
V1Fodbsc& Lo" Model
MD
Mo0.I
J
MdMI
~f~~i~y
Stdmanu______
____
FOI
_________
IJ Utt
Moul V
ata PMots
OU
Pcovou:
Mae.
toot flowchart.
ci lutc. using thle jet conliltianld. thle jet exit Machi utilitber pressure and~ teiliperit nrc are speccified!c as 'vecl as the
she.ar laye
vr thickness at the nozzle lip and thle shear layer
9rowth rate. Iii the citt coimimand. the jet shock cell
spacing antd shock pressure jumips arc specified. After tlie
flowfihld is defined, the( frequiency coimmiand i5 used. As alt
easy referene point. the M~ull optioii is cltoseii wvhiichi stiniiiatv thec screech toiie frequency using a formula fromt 'Fain,
'ecilier aiid YLO. The spread comuiiand is u~sedl to generate
a l1IstOf analysis: frequencies abourt aiid includiiig (lie cstimiattd frequency. Once the aiialysis frpequecies have beeni
defined lie iterate command is selected front the mnenu,
For each fre:quecuY. the workstation tool progresse thlrouigh
lie four nmodutles to determiine whether or iiot the( particular frc~jruciiey instability wave is amplified. 'flit, resulting
out pitt of thre code, viewed by choosiiig tire: plot commiand,
yieldsi anl xy plot of amplitude vs frequeInc:y inl Outi Of the
winidows -selected oii the sCcreen. as- "holivl inl figure 6. If
des.ire:d all four window sectioii, e:ati be used to plot data
coiipariing various runs, of the code. Each of the modules
arc described in further detail below atid somet resulits for a
saiiple aft end flowlield are given.
4.1
Iuistal)ility Modrtle
35
-3
-1
isas
n~.~ci
4
n
syi
a
is
wvTnwWUI1
StM
tid to fuirt her unde.rstand t le. shock v'ortex interact ion is cirrcit ly onL-going its part of this programl." Tile experimental se-pconisists of a Macli I .37
Anl experfimetllll
4.2
~in
(fthe.
htock ce,:ll es
j aiiump cuii be1 m~odeled 11iuiearly. Wittit
lits',isiiit115 it is, itiossi A to uuidel tile' shtOck- vortt'x
ii!'ri'Ii'i
ill 'los,:d loriii. 'Iie reutii oltitiomi yields- thme
tic %eve'sV~
generated ilat gvnAtc
elloain
u%1
as, tilie dist alice fromi thle shock cell to thle niozzle Ell. cit hr
uacyidrical or spherical decay- process can ]lv, selecte-d to
dhetrinine tile' ani lit tide' of thmewaves it tilie iioze' lip). 'The'
phase' at the( nozzle lip canl be dete'rmmiiicv using thle dli.-
Ia
.__________________-
~'~yiltlong
4A-
Receptivity
%v chil
fi'oii th lvuo'izlQ lip act., to cxcitc tliv hisia bdilt w
illUIsi
_________
________________
1
I gic&.1.
Fiue8
~ia'li'
..
.,icr1%Pigot
ritirt
il
.3
..
RESULTSL
l~igiit
toist:y
1i0 gilitl for oIt- pass.1throulgh thy SvCcvClI
1l1oop ist fivctiicicy for
hioi jtv~i lircv Iliv phiume to
fic'siv~iii
tiipvii irvratio is- Invc.
ILLti ca.SQ'.i
's.ty~I
frvyt'stitati Macli itiii bvr is . I. Ill(: slicar lay'er giow th rtac is,
.0-71an ilidt' full' vXtcili~dVd Macli iLItiibvr is-15.5 N Oiv that
lit' %talkiiof attIpIt
hUdQ ill tli..'sv tiguics is- the '11ii1 of tI"y'n
a Iiijlli itidQs fIOti vadl of ihliw hck cvl&l withIi hi forcvinnt1
a ad ta iiccllatioli iiccoliiticd for' Nottv t hat 011
li jI shwsio
t %V
't I, :tJI looi' gain.l "illct: it': iu'shltiting ititiplit iidtcs arc ;inl lcss,
thani illt Otginal aitilpfilidti.
ivc. A/.\j <' 1. iFigitrt 9. It)
;U01d 11 s11o\
tl(
I
(t'.
it' dt
lit'
.i iiti tollittioll't.
buiit w~itIiiic t't-aiiig ftstrai
Mac
at
of -7.7
. 5..%.ad U93.tIcott- that t it' ftcctlack atittltQ
iwkitct'caac with
t't:s
t
iti.lI..IIIII
Miittc
id thbat iii tatct Of tilit' lihigt'r
Moilil 1111111Q
sI
t is1t's
tlt'
ircis a c
ci loop gainl itt to
Ot
tORt fi'. ii': titi's A.\l0. Q t lv ttiii'r of frvt Ilittcitcs itt which~
a ijguin
(lot', occu, iii'ac
vlraiiiaicaill' withi ilt~licicaii.L Il. t'1i1ItUll MItl tin ilil'c. ' Ilciitciaisiill 1)%WI'lihIc I is
its is a, 'fulous.. 'Ili ht' "v-' ,cr~t'cdk t Ioct.55 gcticcrall \1r,-'
ill ai
it.I
irt'''idot
OI
i u'tr
(it (lit' jt't shoc(k
If s.in'ig.
p.vI
Flt ''i'.'ti, [,' 111 jos's- ii.1.
!I illt;ii~ttiihh ittOdlt
''ii
1" , olt.,ivi-t'i
I'i
lopaat;ii it i'oitgilY ili ftt'cstrvraiii
l't
~i
~lIIiuibvrs
dIp- olsoiitl.
AI Ii.. ,,'osi'
f "),1'4iii~l iiiiia
pi''pI'giitt' tpkiIsirtan1
s
,ctl
ptc'd. 'Iits
-11
1 Ip ... i ',ii s.t'd apjwm'
).,ct' Ow' licpt-atijcvd
,A s')ii ii'. tli'. pIro['tg;liOiiou s~t
l lit,Ii'.' Irt r'ai p~roj)~igital
ill .
sJ-dI
l'':,
iii'ft'"
Figury U
',\I: M.,
tiltt'
~ttv
11-7
1'igurv 14): Nl .
IjA0
II
M\
81,
5 s
4..
lva
r r
gelAowtl
,Itatc
JAM#`~
~
N" 0
I.'-
i; W,
1g
1 '.:
N
Ir~t I
I .7
XI
\I
itcl vr i gr\
utyc ikIit (v
00
al
uit
wt..
",ll %I1,u
_______l
"
tl"I t1-1
6.
CONCLUSIONS
8. 'lain, C.KA., -Sejiter, J.M. and Yu. J.C.. "Proposecd Relationsitip Betweent Broadband Shock Associated Noise
and( Screccl 'lorics.." J. Sotird and Vibration, 110,. 11986.
9. C2audill. M., "Neural Networks Printer, Part L." Al Expert Journual, December. 1987.
runs in a few seconds onl a workstation. 'rte code takes ad- 1.Cuil
. Nua ew& Pitr
atIA
vantage Of a graphidcal inlterface. Within this interface, tielt:dl.
. Nua
etok
rmrPr
1"A
1988.
Expert Journal. February,
('Fl solution of the jet to be analyzed c:an be dis-played,
thle screech pirediction code can be rttn tising tite appropri11. ('atldill, M.. "Neural Networks Printer. Part III," Al
ate ntetttt seections, and the variation of intreicted screech
Expert Jottrntal, Jttne, 1088.
adttJplit ude gainl versuis frequiettcy canl be plot ted.
12. Rice, E.J. and 'laghiavi. It., "Screech Noise Soutrce
P'reimiinary icstil's fronti a sitgigl 2-1. jet illtistrate tite efStrutctuire of at Stupersonic Rectanguilar JetC* tl
feels, of fmreetratn Maclh ttttmber atd sitear layer growtht rate
Aerospace Sciences Mieetiig. AAA-92-tt30.3, 1992.
oil both the screech amtplitude and frequtteliy. hIicreaitztg
fr-(,1rcani Macit ituinber has' beett sltown to dramtatically
7.
ACI(NOWLEDGEMENTS
itttd
S.
RE'FERENCES
t
ian...
.\IAA.87-ttiMt. It87.
i.t
t'.rt.
ii. 4'tttptoaawto %%t
WaKe.thtk
htoletctluip ol ASMhI hoWgtitm
va
r aalythau Avvtus.
ttki.. XXA..httttua. W".> lto .11411. 191.4
13J. Walker.
12-1
SUMMARY
A method for stress calculation using the Power
Spectral Density (PSD) technique for acoustic fatigue evaluation is presented.
The sound pressure levels (SPL) are converted to
acoustic pressures PSD and applied to a finite element model representation of the substructure. This
technique can cover: complex geometries in substructures, detailed effect of reinforcements and the contribution of sevtrrd normal modes, improving the previous procedure based on ESDU data sheets that accounts for simple geometries and only contribution
of the first mode is considered.
The method is used to predict stresses at substructures subjected to severe acoustic environment,
Comparison with acoustic fatigue test resgut show
good correlation between experimental data and theoretical analyses in terms of stresses and accelerations providing an encouraging basis for further work
in this direction.
I INTRODUCTION
Since aeronautical structures are getting lighter,
more complex and aircraft performances enhance,
acoustic fatigue arises a a problem in areas subjected to severe acoustic environment, even becoming
critical for substructures design, especially for large
panels with small thickness,
Validation of the procedure includes sentdtivity analysis to the relevant parameters from the fatigue stress
prediction standpoint: structure boundary conditions, frequency cut-off, damping values etc. To tune
all this parameters, an exhaustive validation program
has been envisaged, covering:
#A"
12-2
The validation task is still in progress and only information concerning the first three steps is available and presented within this paper. Good correlation has been obtained with the simple cases reproduced with alternative procedures. With the specimen tested under laboratory conditions, stresses and
accelerations were predicted and compared with test
results showing in general good correlation (within
method limitation). Description of this application
constitutes the bulky part of the paper. A limited
amount of information regarding ground test is also
Substructure:
Simple geometries
Complex geometries
Boundary conditions:
Modes contributing:
Input excitation:
Plane wave.
Constant acoustic pressure over
the frequency range close to
the fundamental frequency
Output response:
BASIC ASSUMPTIONS
12-3
e Parametric variations.
S,(.)dw
(3)
And the expected value of the number of sero crossings with positive slope per unit time (NO) as:
NO =
(-
d-
(4)
P
4.1 Sound Pressure Level Spectrum Conversion
Into spectral density of acoustic pressure
Starting from the available sound pressure level spectrum in third octave band, the spectral density is
obtained in three steps:
1. Relation between the sound pressure level
(SPL)H, at a particular frequency and the level
(1)
--
=fl_
2f2
(SPL)H. = (SPL).
(5)
= 0.235633, (6)
*
101ogto f + 6.3533
(7)
2. Relation between sound pressure level and r.m.s.
fluctuating pressure P','.
From [a]:
1
where H)s(w) is the frequency response of any physical variable u, due to an excitation source, Q. that
verifies the transfer function theorem:
(2)
Pvm,.= t(9)
12-4
3. Relation between the spectral density of acoustic pressure PSD(f) and the root mean square
fluctuating pressure.
When unit bandwith is used, the squared root
-A,-.
PSD(f)
=[r,
(10)
________
Therefore:
PSD(f) =
[10
-"."9S9"
(11)
20H +11.3U101)32
(12)
2 2
"* Nehsize.
"aReinforcements
"aCut-off frequency.
"
__
PSD(f) = [10
Hs.
SBounda
y Conditions. The only real boundary
condition easy to reproduce in a finite element
model is free-free, Actual substructures boundary conditions ate seldom free-free being a combination of clamped, fixed or simply supported.
Attachments flexibility provides additional uncertainties to boundary conditions making necessary to perform sensitivity analysis of this parameter.
2,0
1.I
1.00.5
g
0.0
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
Figure 3: Damping ratio correction factor
12-5
--
,'II
"ItI
. I
II
III
,,
"I
!i
,,
.44".y
1
_|,.
____
,....
Figure 4 shows the test specimen location on aircraft engines area, isolated test specimen planform
and longitudinal crowsection where feeding channels
and bead shapes may be seen.
Plate
Dimensions
a XbXI
Fla
Curve
0.36 x 0 .1700
00
fa ts
C. r 0.48 x 0,4 x 0.002
,,
~., ,.,
-'-
urva uieRSU
I/R
(a) Method
Present Method
0.000
__ 82.6
22.0
12 1111
415.
2.10
0.000
0,125
93.8
128.8
0.250
107,5
0.625
350.0
1.250
401.3
19.0
11.0
83.7
944.1
23.80
2.1.7
94,1
129 .2
21.75
13 .72
197 .8
5 .35
2.1
350.3
3.85
1.0
405.6
0.53
.0,
vt4
12-6
NODES EI
N FEMS
No. ELEM.
2897
2647
External Forces
Exciting
forcesandaresometimes
usually given
as oneband
thirdsp~ectra.
octave
band spectra
as octave
6.3
6.3
q
2
e
.
Fu
5:
.illl
icloig
I IIq
I ll
"12-7
6.4
RESULTS
Normal modes and frequencies:
The modified Householder method was used to ohtain the normal modes. A previous static (Guyan)
reduction to the normal to the plate degrees of freedom was performed in order to reduce the CPU time.
6.4.1
7 Accelerometers (Test)
MODE
THEORETICAL
ANALYSIS
TEST MEASURED
FREQ.
(NO.)
FREQ. (Ha)
(Ha)
1
2
162
194
250
4
a5
314
383
ITO
190
215
245
270
315
340
_____6 443
I'
440
ML
iN
..............
12-8
IIISs- sr.M
W.I
(MPW)
60 f
0
..
0 1
30
40.. so
(f)RMS - M.IM,.,
U.y.O?0,d..-0"',
4
W...1RMS -
('I
60,
-7
10
10
LU
110
IGP.IIRMI-I
o
. C8;7.A:...
8,
d14"
21
i.4.I0
Vl.. aOl
12-9
21
12
3 4
or h.
he ,,k
uiun.einfluence (1cudeh4,or
of the crack can
hae"
an
(local change of
boundary conditions and stiffhess) leading to local
stress redistribution that has not been covered by
the analysis.
MODEL
DM
DIMENSIONS NODES
) IO N
0.9m X 01801
No. ELEM.
N
11
I MID-AFr
l
I0 0.948
Ix x0.600 11 2266
Table 5: KMe beasr FEM's Summary
24?9
808
12-10
Test
Figures 16 and i1 show the comparison between imnulated and meuured acceleration rms values for the
27 on ground engine runs and the two substructures:
aft keel beam and mid-aft keel beam. A are sion
line has been also superimposed on ea.h plot.
Predicted
Figure IT: Mid-aft keel beam Comparison
Test
___will
I CONCLUDING UMAkLKS
A FEM + PSD method to compute acoutic atigue
stresses has beea presented. The method usm al.
ready existqig modules embodied is commercial I.
aitelement codes to evaluate system resposes to
random escltatoa, and overcomes the limitations of
the previous empirical methods, allowing to consiet
complex Iloomorks, ditereat boundary condition,
struttfure,
I.1
pedicted
12-11
LHars .
ndCei,.E(its)Shc
and
Ha
brrison HM.andbCreeok.
(Edaw-itors, Shoc
andVirato
1adbo.
cra1.le
Yr 91
2. Gockel, M.A. (Editor). MSC/NASTRAN Handbook Ot. Dynamic Analysis, The MacNeaSchwendler Corporation. 198.
3, Newlanid, D.E., An introduction to Random Vibrationa and Spectral Analysis. Loalman. Lou.
do. 1963.
4. Haris, C.M. (Editor), Handbook of Noise Con.
twol. M4cGiaw-Hill, New York l95?,
6. The relation between moead ptresue leve and
t'n', fluctuating pressuore. Engiseering Scieaces Data Item Number 66016. September
1976.
C Th estimation of em atress in stillened skin
Klaus K6nig
Deutsche Aerospace Airbus GmbH
Hi.inefeldstr. 1-5. 28183 Bremen, Germany
Summa
rl
Within a comoarative study. 29different couoons coverinq different designs and 6 different materials
were fatigued byanexcitation of30q'/Kz ona shaker, The selected designs and materials reeresent
realistic alternatives ofanaircraft surface struc-
2,Test Soecimeis
The couoon design was asshown inFig. 2.1 and
twpa'
Tw 1-1
Sesides classical aluminium. CFRP isthe best material with regard tosonic fatigue,
Ail/li, ARAILL
and A! layer materials showed shorter
life times than the classical Al,
The most striking imorovement indesign for the
dimensions selected here was achieved with seoarate
doublers between skin and stringer.
The nodal damaing found was most often smaller than
the 1,7% of the critical asKnown from ES00 for Al
Pure CFPP
without niqets snowed the smallest damDirq: 0.6 - .9
3.Test Method
:Introduct ion
irst. it must be stated that the test rietihco
is
3ni.'
9u't
ieiertireless there are sti!i somie
coen ouestiors,
7he, concern anonost others, the influence ofsome
,ese
~
1aaees
tr characteristics of new materals and the safety criterion itself.
tre "illcwirg
on
('Imp hIIP
?'f llcmmisij
1
ira first steo a lo
/H.:
oroacoamnc exc'taticn oetween
ondCe
Aircrqfr Structures' held in Lifleherienier. NorwaY. Mal-~ t'94
ano 00 ti,
wasao:1 lectcfind the resonance
r: :,al v wanteo
I.c.c
7ES*
tlffe~ent e.-Iiccrert
arc bardwidth ofanaiyses usec
aiso snow -si,influence. Itisne-.iikbre for the
creoue-cries tcit
clearlY visitla :or the oalroiri an.,
te strain.
of'es,_Pesjits
resIcs cc
13,
-excca-cc
fco t,b.
:xt~t'i
nenocr
eqel
3^cto
ac ssrtos.et
'e.t '~~~ ri irfrpatic cpthe
o'o'
c a~i~ce
tre 1r;!ue-Ces cf'rese onare'ae-.es !,e~:,
tec v ,e,
sit
5."Ierfreauencies
13-3
5.2 u
Dampina
3ad
The sec:nO:
21 freciency cecrease from the settling freauercy
while the settling ;re:uency itself sas chosen !::ne
midd'e of tee largest concave curvature is. Fig. 2-2,
of the smothed curies f freouency over tire.
The thirl:
At the con:t of lnrtiai fracture wnric was oeine: 'n
tre mid:ie cf the iargest conex cu'vatu'e s.(g.2ofthe s2oothed curves.
"
13-4
gi-~;ves
a good survey' Over
Neeartne'iess. Taclit
'ne ineisired test resits. aut ^omoarlsoqs tetween
.oiese different resilos and evaluatiors -3cu%, be
rtduttiov
one addition of a second str,.nger angle also incrsasts the life tile
t-ut for coaocns with' secantt :Go~lts tie irflueven negative.
soe israt"Ir s8Vl -o!
-The
r~nC:Z-;
-re results 3'e :iver
'o'
-es
~ie tine.
.rerenerence
c:p
su'Oassed bvC~.-'
alumiinr'
cayte several times beter iwhile
:,tnum. A;ALL aid ;-,en alumirium layers ire
worse incocorarison with the classical
-Tlie
ooscwi teonly
'en
'ut
5.Zjld allow an
23wtv
es'e !"e tIles.
e~l:atlo' :cse' tooe re3:'ov 0; o.e alr:ra": wl'r
'os :'essn1e zo:.s7li;rtl~o
,mey
-Stress
130-
:,i~~sse:.
v.,
N2el%3*1e:
re
"es.
74
sd
excubo
materata
Uf smin
DESIGN OF COUPON
F9. 2-1
cmw
-mt
AM
N &130411
0.9
1.2 ><
re
2 1.
1.
~~~1.4
,,1.4
>
0.7
><
<
11 3
Table 2-2
1.0
0.
.
13
1.4
7!
0.8
0.8
0.90.91.0
ic
1.
150
--
140
Al
Af
-.-
io
140-
130
.1
s13
s12110921
-10001000
120
8110
700
700
125
250
375
500
625
750
875 1000
frequency (Hz)
Fig. 3-1
125
250
375
500
625
750
875 1000
frequency (Hz)
13-6
of
nnntype
140
Z44design
1
2 @specimen
w 410'
-s
cien 3
bR
tS
[mm]
[mm]
1.8
22.
0.625
0
28
0
1.8
2 x 1.6
0.6
46
2 x.1.6
0.625
54
2 x1.5
7-1
7-...
0.6
0.625
46
46
2 x 1.6
12 x1.6
Al-U
40"
tR
[mm]
4
5
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
sy
Irn.,Tab.
1.5
2-1
110r
em-1;
E1
Fig. 4-1
goo
_irrm
3808
3n0.
M~z
310'5
ed
4 4001
323,q:~OO12300-1
IF KS.
6,
30
I1
tn. fm
Fig. 4-2
SlTRAIN
MITIU~ON
IN1SWIN (Coupon 1-1.
1g /Ha; 100-1000 HZ)
PIg. 4-3
INFLUENCE OF EXCITATION
fe = 100 Hz)
13-7
1335i,
[HzJ
13403
WinkUInn
frmsig2
11.0
3700
1f2]
60
&
mj
Erma
290
70B40
of excitation (a
Coupon'
bnst:HannlIll+K:
*UK:rn~n~
of
HIP: HII.AutW.
110teew eschl
F1g. 4-5
landwidth
13-8
No
IlU
II
material
AJ 3.1364T3
ddIg
Al/U &M
1,4Imm
t-1.2wmm
IV
ARALL
of skin
TAI
1o17N
t.1.4mm
1.1
Al
1.3
><
1-1.1mm
1.2
(CFRP/OFRP)
1=1.5mm
t1.6non
1.4
1.2
>
1.4
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.6
_
___1.5
_
1.6
1.7
material
IIvaaII
studied Influence
Wive of_da....
1 Min
of
added
7/4 doubler
U
1.08
1.23
1.19
1.31
1.27
1.23
1.16
1.20
1.18
1.31
1.29
1.47
14e
1.29
nI
1.4
1.2
.1i
-ign
W.4mm
1t1.4mm
1.1
3.2
3.0
II
-TA 11Fc~p)
2.0
N.
-
4
.2
tn1.1.mm
1.2
1.28
1.3
1.3
1.5
ARA.
1-1.4 w
CRP8
amn Al
"M",CPln
Al
w~W4 W~W
0.9
1.2
1.3
-
(lMpIF~v/o
)
let.$-m 1- 1.4mm
1.6
-
1,1
1.1-
TV
1.2
A1.3
AK2x4
13
1.3
11
-.
0.6
Al
"air
1-320.4-
2.
.
17....1..
1.2
1.6
1.91
VI
1.2
0.9
-.
,X
1.7
1-1.
1.
11.
1.17
(1.58)
IIllI
AU
Al 3.13PT3
W of d
7~6
1.1
Na
1.2
1.0
1.28
Table 5.1-2
3N2.4mM
1.02
5,,p
, withdblnte.
material
of okn
1122
(jbf)I
1.35
-
e
inlunoce
without doubl.
7"
1.m
1.24
Sym.
1I
1.1 o.mm mm
1.25
.4ram
CP1
CFRP
7/5
M4
1.2 p"
(.pe.P
Sinfluence
.9 1.9
Table 5.1 -1
31
1.2
><
22.
2/1
1.1
.1.3
-'1.6
1.2
1.4
....
t.3x0.4mm
t-1.45mm
1.4
><
II
t-1.4mm
Al lyera
Mwaiwtdw.
CFRP
,Wow IVx Al
-1.2mm
type of deign
CFRP
0.7
Thb/e
(%
of @11 11B
13-9
'IE
~X
El
F0cc
\X
/U
Id
I4'
xlLW- -
, X
\TXA
OL
VV/VI/
lxpxx'A
IV
13-10
No
mae~l Al &.135473
+ eakg
.2m
1-11.4mml114mnin
1A 11,2mMr.
1.6
CFRP)
!IVVV
ARALL
Al/U9
2.1
14515
-TA C2R
30 g I
lyeodejpr
iel
e. S.r
________
_____
V
ilI
or
Table
5..4-2ERGE
~
~
A] 3,1364T3
Il
-
A WUS
ARALL
-15m
dobe
.1 3
l.
Ia ..
..
.4m
rvtln
_.
slrrge
1.2
rtcl
-i-
CR
A]
C pU
stinr srne
Atlayern
Minsiaaadw
Cl/FP
is.
db
41-el
Wosi
2i:a0.
-s
~ MESDEAPETMES
abl 5.4-2
ll4mr1=2m
dbl
ski over
a( b,.
db.~.....
1=200.4MM
IA1.5 C
adu
-cR~
Thb
Allayers
cay g
clmpn
inde.in*4
Al
Carie
.11.31
i.nr---i
DAMAIGE VLOCATIoN
+ sealin
Maerial
doule
A0. double
.1,
30 9N/Hz~
chosen
1.4
oelprg
,io.~d
1.2 1A
-.
No.
of
= 1.34m
e
kn
__
tY
mAl
11-1.,4rmm
"lir
bure
rnateraj
of Sktin
tl.5imflV 1.1.5mm
1.2
1=4m 1.14m
11m
skinge
111hiluandim
11
1=12
3
Al (CFFPRP .
511,1mm
1.3
<
CFRP
500.?
InII
06
*ZK
adlu
iURCITIO
E LOCAEPTNINGON
fin
MAeUeancyml
2%MT
deWeem
IM fro
#jt
(vfelll
rei
000"ri
13-11
NoIIIVvI
al
Al &1364T3
lme of demlsii
W-.2mm
ofsn=
CFRP
Al
CFRP
ARALL
AIIU505
eln
n
M
t-1.4mml WAR.Mm W.2MMIW
0.5
1.*
1ret. 2.1
0.2
5.1
1.91.23.0
.2
W..m
-. Immn t1.5mm
3.5
W-AJ
1.5RP
Allayers
1j.145rmm
01
t.3 x0Aman
0.6
t-1.3mm
.2
>2.51
0.6
1.1
0..
0.6
1.2_
0.4
1.
.4a
______.0
0.
1.U.5
0.1
a.:
0
0.74
0.01.0..919
2 % deceas fro st
0.n0feuec
0.isIgl1.e
_
CFP
CFn-
1.2
>.20
on8.
5.@NWF.
as3~
AM
InteL,
6eae
rat__
all
a/
2/Ir
sb.6.- ><
0.9
SIreli
33rf
____
TIC sme<wede
n~Vre1
0.2
>
0.
0.
2.2
Mlnlomndw.
(CFRP/GFAP)
-.
9109
0.
017
0.94
- Inta fatr
I/
sopt.
IS
5.3
7.4
I-
-FR
.5
-0
.6
added
gym
701,
add
-2%
~
Without
4...iw
doul.
4. anlO
31.
1.
I.?
(0
I?.0
1,41.
Initia fracture6
.7
1.
U 4U Is 16& .
14-1
s I~iflmLr~fl%
While Acoustic
loading waslway prese
KInt in s~onihorns
sitiss aircraft first flew, the adssat sif she wktetgine
drastically clingeil the lvcsl sit intensity pusib4k.. Alsus,
with this increased powiwe,
the aibilility
tus fdwlate
pf.Itdwed
new Issels oftaersulytwusti noise. lit the Isit7tt%.tile
intnsauithtion of csastpilsite "lillursals. neWsoisallic allYN
and "c"w1"A"uAIttauanst teehuttichie
- Kochas SuperKWICst
lssrintelll~fftsugobs Buitding sP/
t were dleselsapsits
pIans~titinureased
peirfintaisce saidweights
saving.
lss'*
neW"
aitaterilsi were rstuiirell naIneet even "Wtuwe
stnngen~t
nouse,tensperature. OWsflatifus, resuiremists1 sonthe
aiircrft Itodi htgokly
maneuserahtle aircratt %suhas th F Ill
FagtlesandVerttaliShsssr Ts~e oilf aidj Lansing iV.Ml1.
1
aircralt suchas like A's Kft Ilarrier It ross-.titan) new
challenges Winslusling
WeIWatates
lhis, 11- pqulisittes.
i klscts
andIkotasples Vsit ruvoiile lfhses sles-itis IsissKVIscl
estrknstey ssasplc% p~tolsltt sal
f hih ;Vnictolwoics
siift
&isiatisl appliisattimas,
sssnstscluld
its lIesasssquk
to these
Mtsetdt Thi1%
satuatikna
quisAbldicatd the nieldVsareW*
"asth'Isss
aOW
new test tee;h"6tuar litWitret strength11,
at~igueg
Willdy-amaaic
design requircifneis.
01 partiasal finsta* sasothe astosastil,
wtattgsslwiolet
sines' it is the aggregaifasm
ofLall oflt"
h4he WlisglttT1k.
A~Likhgwmuumv
aste Am 1"d
14-2
degree of frcedom equations for simple composite panel
matcrial systems. These methods coupled with
experimental validation yielded gross approximations to
structural response and fatigue life of complex compositc
structures and provided the neccssary foundation for future
developments. During this time pei:Dd as well, more
detailed effects on composite structural behavior became
available in linear, nonlinear and thermal effects. (Refs.
2,3) Throughout this entire time Period, NASTRAN was
used as the major workhorse for analyzing detailed
composite structures where panel level equations were not
Testing capability
By 1981K,
linear elastic response of isotropic and composite
panel type structures was fairly Well umlerstis'il. The
primary emphasis in this period Wasthe deVelopnsen oft
techniques which could incorpotrate cmesiinctl loiading
vonsilitwios and nonlinear structural rv
iw hehasisir in
Order to predic~t nmore
accurate fatiguc
.
In addition.
dwiiig this tinie framec the NASP prisprans Ao%
developing
~very coumplicated built-up structisral voncepts which had ito
survive temperatures near 2tm11F ansI acoustic loads
esceedling 1901sJR.These esimbined Issid envirssnnsenit
induced the added compiUcation1 Of nonlinear strWIttIal
resoisse behavisor, Tsi address tINs behavior a nionlinear
resplms oils- for tit stiffened csioimaitc painelswas
created tRef. 4t. This investigation choaied that randlsin
responss for a classical nonlinear duffing sisillassir systwi
sdrs not esihibiltshe %amne rcoatnwss
characteisties as
%itnusssilal eseisatism slFigue 2) TWts metshsw oflsplind the
apparent wcidemnin
of the band 6Wv
#Andisis
respiass cases,
TOis-us-d this research. in 19WX
MI)A in csvtywictionh with
NASA lAngley Rkseatch Cenrtes Sitructural Act-oissics
Branch ;o-dgvelsspes a finite e-lenment based nsnlincear
resprumve stadetthichtW cals
pa
of antysyzn buisltiqi
miulutioiatesal comrpisitc %truetwes wider thermal aid
arssatic km&ad
UThi tes-rch *a& based ontthe w"ik sri Met
AndIsiskt dicussd In RIttlWOMOW q andl 6. The nWW
stitle
was entitletdl Thermal Actoustic Response M1tFatigue oW
fire Btuckled mW Aw Suckia-led Sirwi-tirect iTAPi The
coao wAt*salut decvelpss to includle an egtsroocs material
slainl'a and ausisetiad flight prsat (atigueslile Pit&wsisan
%yemtt
(P."?
L
ks-suks aredewsbcrbd laserinsthis p~a
Recently NASA Langles Rveasrh ("utte has oisisepoase
the came nutilise stir
1UiiUral tesgauslsvsisulainan utow
NAITUAI4 V6i7
3 TESTIN5G CAPABSILITY
to characterize advanced materials for
P(&Bts
14-1
When a structural part b,.:omes very complex, such as a
contoured inlet duct, more elaborate approaches such as
NASTRAN arc implemented. Ail of these methods produce
a series of random stra'n values from acoustic excitation
which are analyzed through a sonic fatigue material
database for ultimate fatigue life. When analyses arc
performed at the panel level, the option to ev'aluate the
structure for a gisten flight profile loading spectrum is also
available. Depending on the application. testitng in the
acoustic chamber or on the electrodynamic shaker can he
used tor validation of fatigue predictions or qualification
testing. All of these approaches assume the existene of
some sort of dynamic strain to failure material information,
This infiormation must he generated itt the form of randomr
strain to failure curves in order foe any acoustic or
combined load fatigue lives to be predicted. These design
.5- years. to he
apporoaheis have been proven over the pas~t
cost effective and arplieshile ito the dc.sign of fighter
aircrall structures fur the F.15. AV-MRl. F/A 18.NASP, T45. YF-Z3 and othercideaneesl fight %ehivcl (Fig. 5).
5 RENUitTS~A'Nh) FANlPLES
To ticnomnalgate: in the sitple~st manner the inskwrtans oft
using the correct anslysit nicthsill Iisa acoutiaic tatigue,
etonsislet Ftigur fi, Weoe resulit fromtan iustrsuitt ItIIv
T~i Aluminum panel tested in MI)As
21
v).tlts.V 771)7S
prigogresive wav chamtwr are showntThe patowl was
Tvst
Oalasipes kin all odesritgil itith a Nsilwd tsiocttistu
reultsil arVshownialiong 'Aith the Ojassl1,%4 lIir~ltvtkii1 Itr a
'44110% Of kswss01114tisinal schemes T14eiMPIss14W degree
osf freItcvk lttinea tlLur% iKO-I, I i ansIsemirenipurusl
%tt
elaOve
At*"use the
tf1e
peeslic
POii
ha141,401 (Rdauo
VUstug the
-vittvmerstal slat at the high AI level
rainlimsar restitaise Itnsiulation oft the TAPS ssk.il much
impeskveu resu'lts art sibonesti at the higherctill levels
Thws ttsult.s indicatec the sssin"ssnsethsat the ksleSatwi
mutit. realise in using the 'twirts strutural rejWnsutalltm
1%twsuntswt linear thesi) sit
esttiaaious
outI mesgwusss'
sevi'velt Pirusaliiir the sitrutural weight twessuse .*I *ivet
puts' aswt Untiralistu 4#4au kVId While
Oktoltgttit igthePa
s14*Ttt
ft"~WMitI these
tsat W11%essi.
this Sssint114111WM 41441CS
alvs SIgT
auiv sirs' in the Isictalutv awnds
sinime kssg
&.
~4
tojU,
IA DING~ UWAIAKS
lo-bw
us moloceraiive so idtawi
fes4isitms Isittomalatusin
of a viilClrtes
Tis ill .sitoolv the &hWes csttspiNaIVIk8n41
ofElilt stohmaeuktimiaw
lawuwteloo
orwlt. W6t1
h'eflatr 7 1"et a tlbts. hsa
snlsativ. %sunssmde
4 aialesowas
0-a~t
a aeft s~tasial s*)a-%Wat)
VAaairmls
s-ua
(UapltuSieA ov paiwl tested at 3641A on !4WAis-4siwcmitIn
svt. tmugh miwv Atcwaa lite fousheuonissCAM
tusilaitis pawsl rPisistosthamesiigritt
. Sasc,
the Atajitah ho simhfriss-s
Ibmu,
ke iade %Ioiws
tess-safh isfteasdo K. ftiothiet mUkriA ther
TAPS *vdiwwas
iwo "Qtilisca wiethe
bdo
Sere suititissmutl)
is
00
otwan~ ilfewsms.,A &%ssiifwsoiMAs&Is foftisasafto ans khisiwom
h4uuislssiM&l skgsee Itesslsisi liwtia thrum
5
laigS0 lifo as ovahlasfth gluMia
lewluiiqus- ont agosisisis
Mli sslg
09 4
$ posia
"Ose
forst1tasi440a1
s5 55aillikoi TheC
re
basal 11igatmushssus cii A00u4t% fatigue gusAlls
the pastel fts-spkoftw ss-) hitirall) fto"Uhwat Ksiwss-ri a full)
aneitsvliiiig thes ittsm' cll)i an therieipi. fin h bim'
aits) a %stoitqiril simtlile siwitlttisithiiok*
slatiqml espwltuiao
will emWAail
fire at a lai" slesLigsl"
i togkowM
lus thietteftesttiml rwamslit Ithi4sassw
ic s f1tokierie
Thusassuht
coimr"sit
~tru
~IbkPase'.
istr
%"k
s~ar
srtialt
mCd.
wtuloture so
iAktd
14-4
REERNCES
1) Rudder,F.F., and Plumblee, H.E., -Sonic Fatigue Guidc
for Military Aircraft". AFFDL-TR-74-112, May 1975
2) Jacobsen, M. "Advanced Composite Joints; Design and
Acoustic Fatigue Characteristics", AFFDL-TR-71-126,
April 1972
3) Holehouse. I., "Sonic Fatigue Design Techniques for
Ad-.anced Composite Aircraft Structures", AFFDL-TR 803019, April 1980
4) Fertan, M.A., Jacobs, J.H. "A New Technique and
Application for Nonlinear Acoustic Fatigue of Stiffened
Composite Panels", 1989 ASME Winter Annuai Meeting,
December 1989
5) Mei, C. "Response of Nonlirear Structural Panels
Subjected to High Intcnsi-y Noise", AFWAL TR-80-3018,
March 1980
6) Locke J., Mei C., "A Finite Element Formulation for the
Large Dcflection Random Response of Thernally Buckled
Plate., ', AIAA-89- 1100, AIAA 12th Acroacousties
Conferencec. April 1989
7) Jacobs, j.H. "Linear and Nonlinear Actu.tic Fatigue
Methods for Aircraft Structures", 22ndAnnual Advanced
Materials and Structures Technology Workshop, MDC
Internal Conference, October 1993
8) Jacobs, M.tL,,Fennan, %.A., "Thernwal Vibio-Acoustic
Response and Fatigue of Advanced Cotnposite Materials"
Work in Progress, Fourth International Confcrcmn c on
Recent Advai.cs in Structural Dynamics, Soutth Harnptotn,
England, July 1991
9) Jacobs, J.H., Gntensfeldcr, C., Hedgecock, C.E.,
"Thcrnal-Acoustic Fatigue of Ceramic Matrix Conmpositc
M.,tcrials", AIAA-93-131i CP, AIAA 34th Structural
Dynamics and Materials Conference, April 199.3
I1MJacobs, J.H., Kirk, E.M ,"High Temperature Randotm
Iatigue of Carbon Carbon", 15th Attual Conference otn
Cottposites, Materials and Strutttur,:s. Jautary 1991
II) Miles, J. W., "On Structural Fatigue UttIcr Random
Loading, "Jottttal of Aeronautical Scietes , Vol. 21,
November 1954
14-5
Time Period
Pre-1975
*Panel
1975- 1988
*Sonic
1988 - Present
*Nonlinear
Future
----
Sins ResponseeA
Random Response
0~~~
0 L
MGMpLm
Ittofy-H
.,
14-6
VopiewI
Wall
-~
WAter
Cooling
A
Walls Lined
With Anechoic
(11
Wutc
aier Cooling
in
AcutcTermination
in~a
~-7
'
1'
-'
Panel, or Sub.Comcnaonent
PgF"
Fa~Icef'y Is CV.AWJ 00 171 dfi Acoushc Lme~ng Wlith Sift.ilari~ous Cross iow60
Lasaira
Headse
Rgss
e~a. 1GwU
M, Tupea 3
Pg~s YS PcM
Br~Vs
14-7
Structural Configuration
Prelimina~ry
Screening
Isotropic Stiffened
Pae
tutr
Automated Snic
Pge.
Gude
Flew..
Ms~oe~uI
Analyss
Composite Built-Up
Aircraft Unique
Panel Structure
Structural Part
TAPS Lmnear/
ATA
CUtCFatigue
Noliea
Analysis
"wm.
aedn
,I ~ ui egePisd a ~eS
14-8
eq.Jafl
-9-Say emlpirical
2,000
-.e--MDC lost
1,600
---
- anuiytci
LinearUItheory
Nowmeuthod nonliner
1,600
1,400
:L 1.200
13
130
61D
15p6
10
14
OASP
-a.-MM
Wu
300
-ago
1,a0
icc----L
FolnISn
A.
MdaWW"
Mf
14-9
Case
Analysis
Method
Dynamic
Strain
(Olnjin.)
Fatigue
Data
Used
Cycles
to
Failure
Cycles to Failure
Came ( Cycles to Fallure
Linear
1.939
Sine
7.85 E6
1.0
Linear
1.939
Random
1.22 E6
0.155
Nonlinear
1.602
Sine
1.19 E7
1.51
Nonlinear
1,602
Random
4.19 E6
0.533
GP4OgM7,V
15-1
The
3. TEST SPECIMEN
The considered coupon (ty" 7)consists of a skin with 8
plies (I nu) which was reinforced by acocured landing
(5 plies). A L-Stringtr was boiled with Hi-Lok with 4
scaling material implemented between stringer and skin.
given
The dimensions (in mm) and Iby up direction-t ame
inFig I.
~ ~ ~ A% aaIis Su.owsi-
do
wor
4Awaugm Look
ad-Aft*
atnAwO nlw
15-2
4. TEST PROCEDURE
Three specimens were tested simultaniously fixed by a
clamping device which was mounted on the excitation
table of the shaker (Fig 2). On this device an
accelerometer was installed for reference and shaker
control as well. The random vibration load was produced
by a dynamic shaker SA30-V560/ Unholtz-Dickie
controlled by a random signal generator. For the tests at
high and low temperature and within humid environment
a climate -hamber was used. The data were digitized
after amplification and analysed with a PC. The
measurement intervals were at the beginning 5 seconds
and increased with the test time up to 10 minutes. The
test facility is shown schematically in Fig,3.
"
A"transfer
Fig. 2: Coupons mounted on dhw excitation table
I-
11r,
:I----IA0
I1
wlro
If
Fig j
wt
-- 7
7Ij
AW.A
pefro
o~ur_
loa lees
A-
ro_
lifirtirm cur.
oo
.....
"s$V
to~~
~~
The
bodwidth
xain
e osaly the ft pomitsurr
wealdNp"
i1|i
o
in
I-.
itig
*
elilmtdeof
15-3
~j
10000
E 10
code-
4,
pl
I.00E-03 1,00F-04 I.OOE'05 1,0OE-06 1.00E+07 1,00E080
(cycles 2%)
1500.N
dideFig.
1000(L
TESTS
0..........................THE
to
AQ
10 30 40
Input load 3 d8 vslues ig)
60
70
5)
IF
uhat"rp
er"
5'ffK06
ii
Ti
-i ACOUFA T yp 7
my
CO
i-ft-
ju
straingauge
2000
___
d -4I~
I,
.,
W9
NcowI
0
L CALCIULATEDstM/N CURVE
F* 8 Tha
ja
to "
cod
13-4
~6
g,~f
16
t S
~ ~3'~The
3E')
with
Gift) spectral density of input acceleration at
50
frequency f
5
damping ratio
4000
X,
300
thickness
- co.1st
sT~am.delta
2000 -
[0
6/
U
9
sata
measured
It
E Young's modulus
0
10
20
15
It
G6
4a
I
sw
ltadalt-crt
13000
12000.
lo
.
0
1.
is
I
'0
30
30
40
$0
(&!
7'5.
5000
600
og
sri
400
4000+
ataingaug,,'of
Adiode
3000
II
MV
3.5 psirain
,j$
20 00
10:0
*1J
4
6
a
I0
12
Input load 3 d3 values Ig)
1It
-j;
ds-non linea
~
100
X
S
-.
a Can't
ka
' ACOUPAT' TYpe?7
~""
10o
Fig.13
I .c,,IN cuv ofcoaepon type 7 with and without
linwa Calibration
19I
.6
Jja
-M
1'
114
40
01
20
$TOd
3
Ft~ "DW
wd~
(r
7CONW
So.
Wa noo
'0
IIIII
00 on U
10
~~
cauetleprvhsThe
10 weeks)
hui*NVi~romNe (WrCi 5 %hum1111idity
eadiiasem ums were paerin~ed fW WOC 70%
hu~~midity. TIe reslt show a redt~ion of the allowabl
swain by a 6~~s I.7 in the hig cycle "as which is
Itler
" AI r menei
15-6
ge
It2ACOU41AT
IIIM
Itl~m
Ml~
C"p4 TlI
i i
-Ql
AMP~
121 11,
-
.-03
Fig 16
1,001.04
I1004
.01
l0o *
WN crunew
fo coupom tvh "ACOUFATI- turmuulvwd %Wt cwatow &u*xtq& cmwrMls
##qhwuelv P/ ruj*,*dsirtih andmu*ltwv / wpusw, ,
Addietioa'd wih ESDU $02 7 Fig ) f'FRP) Iw rorwom
I1. CONCLUSIONS
The performed inveitusaalos hawve sho
- the smoe
and teting ofthe specimens in hiMO
hmdity mad high wemperuume leWad
to a eduction of
. that
the allowable ti
- te
hak tests indicate a mllnear inmresew of the
maln rate with the input Wd due to the nonlinear
I IIIII I
a ems
agnbes
teduion of
seng$.
of the
II
llY
rs
II I
nwtes
(boe sk*WMrrinm) Mdme
koutii
w laed to a reductim ofthe WMidual
trentth. so Wathe
t hasbe
tnmeasu for
the res"
Itr the
* compMwd w
(red across).
damping mainl.
1,0M.a06
IIII
IIII II II I
Ihl
I II
II El
15-7
REFERENCES
Il1 ACOUFAT: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT
DOCUMENT AERO 0025-1079/Rept 6/I
[2]
[3]
(4]
15]
I.|
A6
Thle
fwidameta
objectives
of
the
ACOUFAT
programme wene:
I SUMMARY
al,
""
Wi
I
"(sage cumud by 6e predominantly tiesemant "im
of *Wrctra
Iopset
to redmon
V0
61c"ihuso asets Wit tbmpldwtt
iea
nstrmil d)~
WAVY-
*ic~
,,-,~~
. MaA1WI
~MAN
16-2
3-1 : Presentation
The endurance data produced is detailed in other
papers and published by the ACOUFAT partners
involved in this activity. This section is focused only
on the main results and recommendations related to the
Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) materials.
Two of the main purposes of the testing activity were
* to elaborate the standard endurance data of typical
designs from CFRP materials with simple coupons
tested by random excitation on shaker,
* to assess this standard endurance data by comparison
to large panel tests to verify if accurate life prediction
of aircraft panel / stringer constructions subjected to
acoustic loading, can be made using simple coupon
tests.
at the present.
..... .
S,-
,-8,,,
9,
Iiii,,&,L V,
'00
-Excitation
s '
]J
:-.igure
q-
I : Typical co~upons
w'
16-3
..
e
.I
,:
,..
'....
---- +' --
,t-+
"
-I--
.HTA/6376
m3.
240. nun
Figure 2 : Typical delamination areas, with CFRP
T800/924 coupons
I.IRE47
Cpl..
n 61-141
16-4
"___"-Discussion
- When determining the reference strain by static
calibration, the two levels upwards and downwards
must be averaged.
,,
.....
am
lo u-
i',o
JL--
16-5
perfo,-med
on
the
CFRP
materials,
-,..
...
Observed
-,
16-6
_,_
Tunnel (WT),
vot1&2
Mh=.b
1 *
TL...
--
M.
MON
*Imjya'iu@
fM5p~~w@
i,t| kfhaI
[.IaIl
I,,H1
""''-f
,*'"TSpectral
#
*#,
,,,
I,
,,
"
______
1.
..
. .. . .. .
16-7
v'clet 3
,=.1
.- 11I~..
=. r-,
~J ~
ReaI paart
I'
,additionally
.:
Imaginary part
Ia i
S. ~
,o:
ESSAI
0:,IREI,:E
~is
imagnrypat
Hz
ler. C.TEL 1j41
1.114
33e CiF TELPF
51163
Associated
of the
Study
Mum
RM5
pressure
Sto-
__
I
flow
...
computed Cros
,
-11.,,
AM,,
.1
41ueA
'h
*
06t
.-
-However,
[ALR
I.
-
+
I
il
-j
2-A
- _P
( 9 1_
P.0 P!hI )!
1,
.1 Z'b
nmin
[00mH1.m9]
w. -t
-roc,
. .Wu.
*-
Ex
x.~
-transverse
ItCtV t
I.l
Moe
I
4
Test,'
H2p(.J
.2 1.
) T
H .2x
no
Hz 1 l. l2p-11 H
HiI
eye~t
l~7~k
IT~kl~' ~elements are defined by the Cross -Spectra. The
ti~
~ r(t~J
,'
77
-!r
~setr
.~
V
Imainay
prt
I
V
&
tn
rate
NZ
of
the
normalized
Figure 14 :Comparison TestlModel
Cross-Spectral densities of thicrating pressures in WT
4-5S Sintilation of the Stuctural Response by VE
Calculatiord Computational Strategly
The1
test panel was modelized : the FF model displayed
constists in 7400 nodes and 33400 degrees of freedom.
This FE model was statically and dynamically adjusted
by experiment.
To predict the dynamic random respons of this
structure with the Finite Elemnvt Program ELFINI,
was followed a computational strategy in which
computationsl are carried out in two gtages:
The complete power spectral matrix of auto- and cross"Ir- for this multiple-pressure input system is than
etablished, on the basis of the measured (or predicted)
auto- and cross- spectra.
16-9
f
fig. 15a: strain gauge 35
WT test measurements
.
,40 M
am
,
lam
FE computations:
fig. 15b: Load input = Pressure test nwtsurements
--
-.-
"
z~
--
of the
acoustic
loads,..
""v
S-I : Presetation
Teiting of large scale structure to sero-acoustical
oads is impractical snd potentially very expensaive,
However. there is a need r- validate the integrity and
endurance of structural elements subject to a variety of
acoustic loads. One option available to aircraft
manufacturer
is to perform tet
I
I
o,
"
'
on structural
th.io
Ist. test-phase :In the first pi-se. the test panel was
mounted into the Wind Turne.1 k-YT;,'snc exc.ited by a
turbulent pressure field which was geacrated by an
upstream spoiler. This confituration w"s 4cscribed in
the previous section 4, related to the acro-acoustic
loads study (see Figure 12).Fiue1:TycaCorltn
The structural response of the pxr..' was investigated
--
7T
---
--
tl
-m
vt-r
---
o-----
1
L
FJ~igre 16 Twisesculrvessur
pecralDenstie cuvesPWT's as in the WT.
In WTFinite
Strain Gauge 10
j-i___
--
TI
TubeI
Correlatio
-~Anti
Factor: 0. 3
Cltom
AMt Sym.
Sym, Mude
Sym.
mode
-~
n Factor 0O1
.Sym,
mode
mode
of the Couvl. w.
16-12
tDasaai Aviatin(lm
iaub
Wriish AMroipace Deftne Uimited.
DASA (M89).
Euracapter DetWAsahsi Cubit
LIASA Airtina.
6-2: Awo-Acoulle Lee* Study (in WT)
Consie Lutahhho CoMb.
0a the basis of Wind-TomWl calibration sea.s
a Peatti
Fohkks Aircraft RY.
empirical model of the ipetiutsepotel characweistics
lsdustrauqa - stausbspauilshat sami (IABG ..
of the wee-acoutic loeids exerted oa a fla pade by the
tintitut of Siiand sad Vibracwan Retteasi (ISVR).
turbulen field creted by a flap (mwqi coafiguration
hatuhs SUiperino Tecoaco (IS?.- LIMSA).
of a typical turbulence) bas been devlope sand Ka~othol
Univenuteisi Laruse (KUL).
utilasad as lead Oat lInpt for Finite Elemen
Natwonal Leeks - an Raiwtevear Lakieaaonium (N~L)
calculations. Mwe WT' tess have been reasonably well
Ofie Nationl d~wlude at de Redacheate
repres"
d- th development of this mmupucl
Adtosptioe (ONERA).
mode of the vpaiowuqoral chavcteaitic of the
PER UDSENd Co.. Aircraf Industry A I S.
seenAcouic l06ads is ancotging With this iniia
SAAB - SCANIA AD.
MWOcse The1
reslts
010th
initia mdellg Wmapii
Socida Anontym. Beige do Co~narwasus
th at
hs ca be extended to modelling the PWT kloas
AMeantque ISADCA).
17-I
-aekl
platt
0111011
NOe the te
The wft
41. The asifmimm
05
,--
aimal alemmim
t*a
-.
*n*,i
meao
fsobe asleut
I I 1ws
o ad aie
ii
ft
I
wk of ag
beapa~a
woi
ft~
tn
St
eriiim'nrAsEta
in jjfa~w Miwey. Ahairiww
17-2
SHAKER TESTS
Due to the presence of matrix. material in the ORP. the eluticity
modulus is lower than that of the altuminiw. At the sass. tanm./
the matixr matenral can contribute Inthe miatuuial damping. The/
tempearate influence on the Glare mateial is interesting: to
evaluate since the matim material and ie bonding strength can
be staily dfeted by dheumutr flututins Three
opertiiig temlperatures. 5WC, RT wadOr-. red -hw for the
tests. Another intereting auped to Glie mateinal testnag is to
lamninate lay-up. A stiffened Glare0
evaluate the Influence of doe
"5kpane- being subjected to acoustic looding; repontds to
viliratirn
Iodwhich cause relatively higher heeding ailsFig.
atthe attachment locationse of therskin with the stringer or the
frame. Typical Coupo configurations we chtsen to represnt
the joint design and also the vibrations modes under a Iatc
loadings. The panel vibration mods at the watiatnet causes
himeding stresses in the skin. The Oun-modet vibration tets
establish U.e fatigue strength 4f skin at the stringer or frame
Punts. SUL. the secondary puts atthe to the skie can also be
vulnerable t* fatigue dunap. The nhb-mode vitiratini tes
establish the fatiue strength, of the secodary pums which Sam*
stringer and nhei(or frames) mU.thstifeimei paerls.
Tmlsusi
Skin: G.LAREi
.
4
I i lieeatNWtIe
Theassitm
etse
30
CW
L
A C oc 1
Skim (IARV
trl
NW10
oubicr GtIAstl; A
U
td tinpr (II A0l
M
Ahu
F19, 4 %RlWla-uvlng sp PIe
1
v vW
ihbundo iee
M...eer
1440
IW
AI
*
Fie.a PW
IN
ICur"I
-4
IR
I
%,.
4 %k
I;wi 4 %k
N."
knWmvv4
kP,--C
~ ~ ~ waILa
a I~
p"It~~~~~
I~E
_i__
IU
wvoswe Nteeed at thieetsi~emwatus AMC,
RT di W`C.
Two typical "*iam*os modes.
i ka~cd
VtteSUi sad asu ie in fiue-mush vskibrainMe
3.
A, Cor E
LR
BoIi o~c
-6
Bondcd Stfinger: GLtAREt
Asthessc: AI'l3-2K
3 Banded-striner specimen
omii
a-p
oddDutr
srkotVlr"
M-N% 3
CilsrsiFo
17-3
Plain specimens (fig. 2): widh this. specimen type. the fatigue
strorngth of a skin in tie presence of a discontinuity in dhe
thickness is tested. These tests msused to evaluate die influence
of laminate lay-ups mid temperatur. Thren types of akin lay-ups
are tesed each type in three temperature levels, Bonded skiwtinger specimens (fig53) we tested to find the influence on the
fatigue swiengh of die bondedi skin-strinier attachments, and
su. ilarly rivesed skin-striner specimen (figA) for the fatigue
strenigd of a rivetd ski-stringer attachment. Rib-mode
vibaixion specimens (1&53) vs tested to determine the influence
or the joint fatigue strength when the secondary element, which
Asstringer in this cute, is in resonance.
Teat precedrel
performed on an electromagnetic
The acoustic fatigue tests ame
"shte. Three specimens wie clamped simultaneously in a fixture,
mounted oa die shakter. The specimens vs loade by a narrow
beand'requency cetred around the average fwudarnettsl
frequencies of the spccunen (f5) as shown in fig6. The
specuimens contiuhm so resoniate
bamiwkbhis r, chosen thasthde
even if there asa frequcx) drop in oweor awe t4 die
:iecunien
determnine dhe
stress distribution during dhe pVe-lest level. In dhe
actual tes phase the nature frequencies of the specimens sam
coetinaally mieasuredl atNLR by monitorngS the Hall generato
which generates current induced frm a fluctuating magnetic
field.
First an allpwance is made for the dro in faquency due aDdie
initial aettlement. After that, a 2%drop in frequency during the
(fig.7).
teat is defined authe failue criteion for die speci~mens
The freqluency can drop due io stiffness reduction following a
crack,. deluninnation between layers, chaige in support condition
due to rivet failure, de-botiding of stiffener sAndskin or matix
cracking. If tno visual dumag is found. the test is continued
somuties by adjusting the frequency range amound dio tOwn
resonat frequeny. Mostly, after 2% frequenc drop, die
deeioation is "Ai anid the damage growth life as not high
(11g.S)1
The failure oathnition of each specimnen is studied aid
recorded.
20 dD/o
20 dB/*%I.
Fig,
Frsq~r"ncmawmer
tor
nwtIa
use,
eoii
L
it itsVf.
Ihf
usuut
kirgnivhta
------%*t
17-4S
R Al
-.
-plain
plain
Fig.
,*
LI
..
Gt
1S
Tft..st
17-5
PWT TESTS
PWT Specimens
Within the framework of the IIRITE/EURAM collaborative
*program,
two Glare panels are designed and manufactured at
Fokker and tested at the IARG acoustic facility. The panel
details are shown in fig. 16. The pastel design is typical of a
wing skin, stiffened with stringers and ribs. The stringers get
free passage through the ribs, by means of castellallon. The\
joint at the intersection between a stringer and a rib is an
important pars of design. Escept for the top skin, the panel
design is identical for the btx~h
specimens.
thick skin panel are designed not to interfere with the acoustic
fatigue behaviour of the test panel. The dynamic behaviour of
the box, including the test panel is analyzed by means of finite
element calculations. The calculations are carried out by
Dassault as a collaborative task within the framework of the
Brite/Euram program. The calculations show how thick the
bottom skin must be in order to avoid any interference with the
top test panel.
PWT tests said results
The panels are tested in two phases, the first for modal test and
the second for acoustic fatigue test. The modal response of the
two test panels is first evaluated by exciting the panels by a
loudspeaker at sound pressure level of 104 dB. The natural
frequencies, mode shapes and damping factors are determined
from the measurements of five accelerometers which are
mounted on the panel. The typical plot of vibration mode is
given in fig. 17. The damping of the individual natural modes is
obtained from the decay oscillations as well as from the
frequency response curves (3 dB method). The values of loss
factor il are 0.0158-0.0255 for the Glare A pantel and 0.(X)5 0.0123 for the Glare E.
\
\IN.N
Fig
4,r~
Fig
ski i
16PW ti-o
8kp
16~se
aWt
th e
deinaos
aa-
oa
bos
are
Tto
ki)prk-cockaA
lpatoi
*Mr tht derotgas
re w
sakhin
ifeThe
d
lr
Guv A sivGiare Howlti
Acusi
I?
Moa
Nit
irime
y1w&vtcoi
crodootb
'*Ap
G-
Anlsset
n wPT
*xai
. wto
ociitie--
wpi
atsornbr!wk
nl'asra
IN)tra
wtn
A prsctussa
air rum
i anouble
hs skimal itn san fSIffIa-sand
O
vSOh1)ea psuhow inh fihi
di sa7*non
sie-
17-6
Fig. 21
17-7
22kin:
Glare-A oi E
s,kin (dire-A or E
1.
rib 'eiglant
stringers
Fig. 24 Rib-castellation details after repairs
DISCUSSIO)N AND CONCILUSION'S
The shaker
ptame"
The aL4PAua.
faililute titintl~h i-I GMarv. A arki E larinates t%root
affitcltail by the tempereature 11twluaiaawi at the WMairr111,111a1
jIa~teita However. the tempilerature iufliiei tm clane c' t
17-8
are design critical for acoustic loading. The tests show that
Glare panels can withstand high acoustic loads, if support
structures are property designed. The rib design seems to be the
most critical for a wing-like structure subjected to acoustic
loads.
Acknowliedgenxnts
The research work is carried out under
Brite/Eiuram program, and the partial financial
by the program is appreciated. The calculation
Dassault engineers through the BIE program
acknowledged.
the auspices of
support provided
qupport given by
is also gratefully
References
I.
2.
3.
S5
Wrightll'awmtwsa
Air
10t
1I
4I
II.
12.
Bayerdorfer, G., "Acoustic Noise Tests on two Glarepanels". IABG Report B-TA 3139. 1993.
iA~sqtgj.
~1
1gJ,
For a given vehicle Machi number, the dynamic pressure a1to higher in the dense air of lower
altitudes. For at same Mach number, the 2600
q ascent trajectory Is at lower altitudee and In
denser air than the 1000 q asceat. During boh
asCents, aerotherinal heat flures Will cause high
skin temperatures. To reduce the heat Alux and
slow dowa the rate of skin panel temperature, rise.
the vehicle must gain altitude Into less dense air
" speed incrtases. This is shown by the leathera)kia trajecory ls"nes Fig. 1. Descent &rm
orbit Is mae& with the alribreathing en nee shut
down at 20 q in a trajectory similar to the de.
scent trajectory of the spec. shuttle (Fit. I).
2
2
XOF.Y
AZ1JLUM QtY- iiL
0tilmlsod Atiroeathle transatmosphoerl vs.
hikTlr
"
I
edie yteAs
stae.to-orbit objective and the need to carry largle
an Ain no Stu
9W4
18-2
18-3
heat flux for the 1000 q ascent is 20 BTUIfL'and the fluctuating pressure
set (0.22 MW/mr)
is only 140 dB (Fig. 9). Thus location of shock
impingement is critical to the design of hypersonic
vehicle skin panels.
Transient thermal analysis of the carbon-carbon
skin panels was made to determine skin panel
temperatures during ascent to orbit. The panels
receive thermal energy from aerodynamic heating of their surface and reradiate this thermal energy into space. An alumina insulation blanket Is
placed between the panel and the substructure to
limit convective heat transfer into the substructure. Temperature rise of the forebody panel due
to aerodynamic heating of the attached boundary layer during ascent is maximum at the center
of the skin bay. The minimum temperature rise
occurs adjacent to ihe substructure attachments.
For the 1000 q ascent, the calculated peak temperature is 2670 F (1460 C) for the forebody and
2510 F (1375 C) for the ramp. See Fig. 7. For the
2600 q cue, the corresponding peak temperatures
of 3250 F (1790 C) and 3010 F (1650 C), are above
the 3000 F (1650 C) maximum-use temperature
for carbon-carbon. If the flow relaminarises, max.
imum temperatures are reduced by 1200 F (650 C)
to a maximum of 2050 F (1140 C), which is within
the temperature range of carbon-carbon. Thus,
analysis of laminar/turbulent transition and heat
flux Is critical in the design of the forebody and
ramp panels.
L--
18-4
A directivity index was used to determine offaxis sound levels (Ref. 9). Reflection from the
ground was taken into account to estimate overall sound levels on the vehicle skin during takeoff
as shown in Fig. 12. Direct radiation from the
engines results in overall Sound Pressure Levels
in the I10 to 180 dB range (relatre to 20 micro
Pascal) on skin panels in the inlet and exhaust regions. These levels are comparable to the highest
level measured in turbojet engines. As sbown in
Table 1, engine loads are considerably higher than
the attached turbulent boundary layer loads, and
they are comparable to loads due to shock impingement.
1i
+ --
.i.
18-5
?- CONCLUSION5
An analytical study was made and test art
in priogess of vlbroacoustic fatigue of hypersonic
Right vehicle skin panels. A sintlelstare to orbit
mission and Mlended Wing Body v-hile woere d-.
atative ofpresent trmnsat.
veloped which a repre
mosphertc vehicle design studies. The exte.nal
flow feld and boundary lae bating ere detmined by parabolised Navien-Stokes flow analysis.
Fusgine acoustic loads were tveolpd. Detiled
thermal, static, and dynamic analyses have been
I-
L..
TableI
Acknowledgements
Heat flux,
awtliks
Attached tcurhuei
bcwidary tyer
145
22
b~ounar lv.ayereta
Engineexhaustoa scane
astakeoff thrust
74
176
IOD
Loading
.g0
References
ITTT
t l
--
pp. 594-602.
-j-
l kbv
-Aki W4 rjW~,
4
bya ssailpevesan q.5. M
hAa
v..bacula Aftigt aca-91po'Ic
16t' eSses at Wa 4) Mac.mk
P
.5
-sffe4 IUs" 't154
PL
of
....
..
-.
Sk4a.tr'
5W
1t
'4*a~ca.a,6j
18-7
Fig. 6
Fig.
ltlliput
0.3
SETINFigure
Il!
OA
.0
i/
i/I
K
!/t
S"::!
to v*eil,
.Q
4.6 .0
i 717
Z,I
3:,
'
..
3.
7 Forebody panel
temperature
rise for [1000
(I ascent.
V77
1i.
g. 5
%,r -l'l
18-8
Pn-phasiie
wavd
o-o-hae.
Tw C,I-.Cu
TP.-t
FAe
ee
Itube
'
.
18-9
LI
NO PAILtJRE
i DE.. ]NOT13
S PECIflhN CORT/M&
DAnflAGE 13Y G
INSTALLATION.J
-T
TAo)o
AT 110
T7 MITIIO
CYCLES70 FAILUR~E
____I
___OC
19-1
NTC, PO Box 77
Bristol BS99 7AR, UK
SUMMARY
Two specimens, representing an
1.
INTRODUCTION
Prrrei
be subjected to extensive
elongation without pronounced
localised thinniing. For the
process of diffusion bonding
the mating surfaces are+
brought into intimate contact
at elevatexd teCMperature 11nd
atomic diffusion across the
interface pIrXLuces the bond.
For titanium, diffusion is
aided by the fact that the
oxide film, which in the case,
of other me.tals inhibits
diffusion, is absort.ed within
the metal at high ttznpeature.
As both supe,'plast ic forming
and diffusion bonding occur at
the s1vW% tomperatur, in
titanium (92;'C to 9qrO'C) the
combination of the two
processes is often exploitdl.
Superplastic behaviour of
uaio ,wpr.,.iwm
esDa"
d in IjlcAvhaimr. Notw',i, AlmvI 9W.
19-2
2.
2.1
poi er)
This was a multi-cell wedge
shaped box structure having 27
internal ribs and a single
excited.
3.
EXCITATION ENVIRONMENT
The applicable environment for
the control surface panel,
based on the actual aircraft
location, would be a maximum
19-3
employed LIV-EPT200
generator,.
4.
TF~s PERFLOMANCE
4.1
skin/stiffener junction as
shown in Figure 7.
The panel was attached at the
three hinge fitting locations
along one edge with the other
edges free to represent the
actual boundary conditions.
'The structures response test
demonstrated that the control
surface panel was able to
respond more readily to the
overall modes occurring in the
lower frequency range as well
as being excited by the
19-4
4.3 Discussion
In general the SPFDB titanium
structures provide better
resistance to accidental and
debris damage than
carbon-fibre composite
structures and better
repairability. For example
carbon-fibre composite flaps
situated behind landing gears
may be subjected to a stone
damage on the skins which
would then be readily
propagated under the acoustic
excitation. However, like all
constructions subjected to
high noise environment the
detail design is of the prime
importance as this is usually
where the damage occurs. The
spandrel shaped void itself,
which is formed at the
skin/stiffener interface in
SPFDB structures manufactured
by the 4-sheet technique,
appears to be no more of a
problem than those introduced
by other means of fastening,
in similar weight structures.
In the final comparison, if
all structures can withstand
the noise loading and meet the
weight requirement, it is the
cost of manufacture which will
dictate the chosen method.
5.
CONCLUSIONS
The SPFDB access door
shown in Figure 9.
failure.
19-5
ii)
BLANK PREPARATION
a gas-tight 'pack'
Platen Press
4
*
*Outer
V.f
19-6
WEB FORMING
E'xCITATION
SDIRECTION
SPANDREL-SHAPED
VOID
CRACK INITIATION
S]SITES
FIGURE 2
DETAIL OF SKIN/STIFFENER
INTERFACE
JI
FIGURE 3
19-7
CENTRE HINGE
-IFITTING
RECESSED AREA
FIGURE 4
--
~640 mm
J4
19-8
E
E
500 mm
FIGURE 5
160 dB OASPL
165 dB OASPL
a) SPOILER PANEL
FREOUENCY (HI)
FIGURE 6
FREQUENCY (Hz)
ilvmmm
mm
nun
u,
19-9
a) CRACK LOCATIONS
mm i
100
100oo
TRAILING EDGE
b) LOCATION I
mm
r "
PANEL
EDGE
TRAILING EDGE
c) LOCATION 2
FIGURE 7
d
d) LOCATION 3
19-10
195.2 Hz
a) TYPICAL SPOILER RESPONSE MODE IN LOWER
FREQUENCY RANGE
FIGURE 8
I3
//
K.:: .. o,
t'
b) LOCATION 2
c) LOCATIONS I AND 3
FIGURE 9
20-1
SUMMARY
flire presenta paper d~ie
the applicable concepts fer Cockpit
noise verificationt in it inilitars .irrcralls
A desigir-to-noise proceduve i,, outlined and tire overall
requireirents for niedical, nirtelligihrlitI~ and operational aspecis
are dceplsldiscLussed, itwcluding the proporsitionr ol*:ki adetikate
iindex til quanutf tie qiialrt. of noise at prints' Cal
2.
Guidelines lor cockpit inoisw-%ontinl, to be applied diriing tire
design phase of' tile protec, ate gr'.wi together %%
thil the
c\pected berrehits
.rl~
rrrg(%
aid noitim nicitienrsr
Advawced noise control nirreasuiir
teclriiqiies are al-A, dealti%%all
arid aispe txlic
cas otl kcockpitlrliaotiis.
now isevt icatroni I, dcilesred
i-AIti.reltdto
1. INTRODUICTION
ltdt
.ti
drl
fci rurcrrr
'rt;r
s..edicaloitpects
~ilk-I
A wsreopm
t-ios aposisihdi% then to 1w (ullomaes.
,tWtin#tfu
a
the piclirninarn design 14 of
the:airciall. to
1'reirif.e ifi d .S..aqaIN-241tM 'Iaiife
-, A.
i(astite i Gswad weAsti nOh.aflutesri
Aids 1Y9'
20) 2
____________________________________________________
ilditarN
-.
.*
..
aircraft pilot
ilt
Studies atiitempting to correlate objective mea~siuremenits %%
Thmhkit Sum
Il'
.i&dstr%
~~Coiiij.,xtte
2' iI~
III the present work the Ioie Correcte.d Perceived Noise lev~el
r'~
cskpsit itosi
x. s%
liciec diai.cici xi .c 0t 1inipli xi ciicxs oi illiid
hliiciictio,,' are not Inwircci, and to 0il ispic:a 'l coinii xhtia
caisIC
CAIt
lcic'x
at
~I;Nr-o~
THE
3i.
APPROA(II
\ IxliLLI
ttlilx
ouiltlined
*tctjiiiicticiits adcilitionl
SI%%ii iiittkic
ti.ei
:
.. iiet~incx
e A.,
a quuillited kt'ihe ould
!dK" 511ISpe hi Initi~tcctki: I emC
cl. M111
ti i i thc wiii
chui
,.
sawleagg
0tu shej.,tuiil pmC-Aut
cm
lel
kitall in thc ihuecv
.otame
luiNA tit, I2il i itt I 2!X
nI"u 14ixMIt
MO ,a~t4 1" I ixi Iii
iexlis I i n li-i'it
dati,
it iexl,iie.1"bca~au1t
.,kiwumnns.
iiicxt tsi
tame-is takc
WWlII kk'iIUniniixAtIofl
~~i
.e).
"%Ilig
.uiI~.d
t~lexi1g
etti;gix--in
i
Lk~tottkl
.1 s )id
niCjwCftiienttx
11,11Wuidai~sxt'
hSI
,.hiili~i
.twinS
Jtt4aim
[light
4an0
.ctaiw*
fm~iitumtlieit. NI lltisati,'t
%stein% Xtr
i
iOW ri~tligh$!NIis
Lli~l
r .i wi- iiii,
n
b'ls
di-sigii
tius
stm
Imi.
it lw%,2,uis
mic
141sw It wi,tnd,,INex
Ilglilvvt
Iiii
qltIJ1M$
OwtI-4
motin;setsantu
"Mi ItIt
Wi~,-~t5VbJs txtwtlt,
oft
the
:uenusti
.aIV
.*Lm
4Ati~tel,41 tmmk I.ss.VJtVAC
ii:sam
Ilwr hummn ictn
th,,.tWs),s
,..
,miwull Uita
m~itunr mhtse-tiliin
`1wi
1.
'UitIMI-t
Jwiys
the
14irats.al
haw In lami.
siIalt
us*.st.J
lwntl
4
ihe
kmrmed fo
,rslian 'mw
le
tc.
Ak istot . t~ins,tt auitinat) fh401s
t- blii.%jtv~ts*
t- U
Ow tan-Imt! ctr~usphsl1s
3and 141""11,41l
lsmdut
an .-samn
ut, tva
ire red~ in .ailc of
a..msueml
iih Ih'MKhnuhanmis
~Icrs
20-3
environment at pilot's ear that can have impacts both on the
hearing damage risk and on the quality of noise.
~~
~~ t
~
I L!J~W
"For
-i-----Of
s~coa)
41111
:.
- ok0 it
4.
CONTINUJOUS
BROADI)BNI) NOISEJ
4111
'~v
hl
4.1.1.
2))
~~
c~f
(hours) =2 %
.....
~t-d,,--
lIn case oftdaily exposure to noise tields dilteriiig Iin level and
duration the fltal I ailY EXpoISIire II
FD)sli all becalculated b%
,Ading the fractions
Observed Dl)sil%Di
)ratsi
_____
tO) A
D
LnniiiikDrto
ItIlAkING
( )0MUMI(AIi))NN
I)AMiAG
I'
'"W lwii.
..
~,,*,..,
~
MIU.1i.L~aili
If~tI*lsp~
.~.,
"~'
Ii4IS~i~IM k~i
lo
.~,giullire
..
~~
15.
sI
ill
Ip 11411,1V
lseitoise Iitlitte hemvl
ceo kik I, I s'ck'til ot lessto:g
I. shall not esC\esI t -Ii 11 Ikwik natiiis flv~iesl. lese
and %hall I%:treated as ats"su iinu'iis Wal'.aldtvs in011C
~ll
20-4
4.2. Communication
noise;
-amibient
hedtsonatnuin
minitary aircrsaftatenat
Al verification procedure lor air-to-ground and air-to-air radio
4.2.1.
ARTICUI.A11N IxNDEX
4.2.2.
JIlIl711
VIF radio coninmuinicatioii
Intcrphove cunnmcn4:1cation
A-, () 5
[li
Al ? 0 1
MRI
Al au
ARTiCI.IA~tO
10
NDX
til
Siwk(cl Ut10It.t.(IGH11i.iiY
tr~~ii :t it~aisi~nws~
:: ii
iariiats ,ii
ir~nn 1 5
Iro
4,)
sanhI.
siisrat
I 1W,,1
gWh
rs
l~x,0vilA
spe~echover
bhl
,%Il NIC
j.11k.j
~Q~Il
Icai
HN
1,10
s4
I f
A
i
NOtttsis~'i.
Mi.3 sa AIAW
to
kwvbIIqjKtId(iIV
ale:
11twiialsirJksirable
At
selilikatrwi
.a.. a.'.~
pru..dlre
I,*r
~ ~ ~Rciltiriticniu
gssssad-i~ari
Waitt
altwgise
In
;wunaiutsn
.) haict
I-W4 O
kiwsismnuii'sAtIoa
shalt sssikr
o~lte Ilvs Its ingw
XII
Wkkt ni~ti
taII
the
111tiui
nis.'o
muthmlI
re,i'
(sinita0,1ion
ns
Ickc
th
sk'Ired
ohsls
difiierul lestl% sit
ti%%iiuklonw Aokittfqi
20-5
II
waC-
4.3. Comfort
'111 subjective nloise percep' ion fitiia ilitarn aircraft cockpit
noise- verificationi procedure, shall be considered ats mutch ats
mtedical and communiiiucatioin Iimpacts
iIRIQ IN(
5.
(S
~oII
IdBI
s1.lll(
ll.
_________________
beveiidPNLT
hti most aniioving no(ise
characteristics, despite aniacceptable
0%erall leve , ere toiial iI\, sharpness and spettral distribuAtion
I Mittlm and carcups, role on thiis matter, atsalreads said before,
15is hind1111ilietwital
Ililportailce
it,j
NOISE QUALITY
91)45
-
to,1
941to
Ir,
95
k~t5F~Sieil
91
\'cN g-ds
10
in
kimcrid Aaslpahlc
I 1.atil~fadon
Magm
, 1t
t
ftl~m 105
\iS'h5,l
05101
Whendaiitai
hom iliil at timats .lie maitable thevpiobleii is
rthlei sitinplited kiiiles Viiiltls111 ,iic toiesexii ill (lie atii'liai
'sstelil altankgotnit AwlsItoisg iil~kitficatioiis tit %Clckiitiohliiie
lie licelesslt
(c g tiiiit'oiliiiiio,'ii4t a sliiijle seat tighlei
aliialtt ((ito a It%( salcti
A spmmil pen
'ltlot
daisesst i.'ic I (Slih Saims %%illithilte
liecjiietics atndthwilehlcoe
4
lit IvcwIbeiscii
ml
thletoile Ikiiid
anid the: ;adiacnt icywi.i
Nhiislo I,4 adidedto tile IN I tit
aw;col~uitto the tolle seilisig ta
IM1let 1,tic %it tilehtiitiiait
leic inig
[tstm
ich fillal fcsuli ot tile stIIliiI~tdiioi is life toile
kotiecticsl
nosiet
iiw
lsc\,l I PNI I i
ltaiissio tile AlenlmiAcmtntiiu v\!xilcilc
le-Aribud tit
Chapitc 9), thle PN1. I %alucs s.2itl repkwiliJ ftt I able 20iIV vis
stetdlot thleewlluatilk" tih nlois %iitlhit a1llts
cdi
(ukolatmlo
niethols~d
to piedict estet nal noiseWeC~tlig tile
mas labte to talimited
nmtilvt A1 moice, I I C tot bitleit bolllutimi 1115certillie. tet
nlloi'
C\te~llial stoiC iioiW. W\11its 015.4
iesatniglt thle
modkwoinw;iii Cowtitiffo
ilk l
wiviivpai thiStl it ighi dmnilitu
tockpit sllttolidling sti titune imeoiil
\esteittil ilvitSAthatist
1 Iltttsitted ItlsIJC the
20-6
6. DESIGN RECOMMNENDATIONS
6.1.2.
Mail) attetntion for cockpit itoise control Shall he put ill thle
structural, aerodlINiaini aiid etivironinental control s.vsteiti
design
design
6.1.1I.
free-laser daminitg
I~
20-7
20-8
Instrumented helmets should be used only for qualitative or
semi-objective purposes as they can furnish variable
measurements from flight to flight as function of test pilot use
in tightening his helmet.
Figure 201.6
reports a schematic view of the aircraft and the
noise sources location.
9. A SPECIFIC CASE
1aa
20-9
verifi~'d and adjusted be-fore each flight test to reproduce a
miediumn earcups force previouslyN Identified ito be %Nearing
comfortable
An ANR experinientai kit %isc also installed inside the
standard helmect and evaluated inI laboratory tests uiid Itt-flight
using the HMS U1.system itI spite of soiiie problemts of ANR
systemn tuning, a good attenuation wasmeasured at lox%
frequency making the noise envirotnmtent more conifbormuble.
The numerical result "syn confirmed byvthmesubjective
impressions afler the listening of'recorded data.
___
HEADphone (2363)
H4ET(11(1242)1tra
HDRIV I (S410)
DATAItcoJe,
0%F
2 3dhlA
L BE-NEIT:
do,p-n.dhipmilight ym
Ots
\%a attitculaied as filhiolo%
Nuflepocci\isslde
%l
l\
20-t0
1)1(1 sI I~Ii iN
TONE REDUCTION':10dBIi
Ground Almac
Trai.ning
AIRCRAiFT
MiSSili
TYP'ICAiL
iidniunnn;
tr toae
Fig-m20 111- Moii Suction Wi,eciec-ic
incrlm
PRiOfliI
Irearun
c-ccitp
9.4.1.
kRHTICIIAl
ION IN-I*F
Idata
aiNMIAS5l F
TSASEi.(
SOUiND
PROOF
~ ~~
~~~
i.
Ci~t-.-
sm.
,n..
"
sPF H
fe tll"
I"Ot
r\\I I
Il rihIiillO
I-~
iIiu
oi7ii
IIN?
t it
I~210
1TarlIT
100e
211 11 N - n'cl
O ,l
IT
flii
t. a, 5.
Im
it ins1141oupac
t
lid.
I.-
a'oa
dah.rmo orswih
is o~rarnghadiap
'a
l
NkGAA
~
!-~lle
i sovd
Ni
AU
PltD(.
b)
of
ll
I-iW
0l,
Z II 1,1rie
jiiiiiiIL
elrftc
iedOia
.k9t
20-11
9.4.2.
Intelligibility tests, according to ANSI .S3.2 method, wer inflight carried out, for the sound proof configuration, using the
HMS 11.3play-back system.
Ali
~i
tongue.
Jj~
NIEA
ERPLT
K tI
ALI
mNJKAaAIM
o
si
aa
smsa
sucRO
'
a)
J~NROOF
ISSUE
TESIS
SPECAN
RON
... ..
___________
IAi
b)
TIbis led to found a possible Index, to coITCelAte
the Objective
P.(I AN
40
F-1SP.
NN ON
LJNNAKEIJ.
%%asimieisuied at lowi
frequency. making the ntoise enviroiiment moore
comfiirtable
TIhe
impacts
on
hearinig
danutagi
and
comtmmunuicatioin
riin
mir,wmsi
Attack
20-12
[soN POOr
I STDHEDsz-r
SP.ANR
sF. ANRoN
SP-ECEQ.I
T.STF.DKIT
SPEECH
INTFIJJGIIUTY
EOCWENT
S-
no
risk
of hearing
handicap.
intelligibility and
-communication
Some
benefits
on
nproduced.
.....
07
GOOD
-o. .
--o .. ..
KIB!
AIRSPEED
INOICATEO
a)
-.
remarkable.
SPEECH
1ITEI.IiGhiIJrY
300
200
40D
Soo
b)
, OU)NIIPRiItF
511) HEADSET
SP . ANR(ON
TMIISEI)KIT
a) U1IFVIIF
SIP. ANIION
5,
pI"EU,
to
lMtnSI y
.o
15
lP.
Iii
V(.Ia
lhl Ma"1
I-
95)
500
400
500 300
11(t.1
AIRSPMED
INDICATED
hg
10. CONCLUSIONS
'lfe applicable concepts lor cockpit noise vernficaicoa I, a
nilitah . aircrall have been described giving emphasis to the
applicable reqluirements Iltr medical, iitelligibilh, and
operational Inmpacts oil flight mncinibrs
Structurc-bonin noise has bcn identified to be tie dominant
source and the most amuiovig comipoinent, as xxoorattenuation
at loss frequency is to be expected fromnpilot's standard
21-1
1.i
Prswmaed .. a S3.
,,im
a 'Is,
24 IN
PT I
PT
,-,,
,
.i7
PITIn
,
.1
h-tspnt-i.
I. JUeaw. . N
hW
ft
TP
21-2
(a)
(b)
I,.2
.of
".,.,,
niquts considered at Dill. and then describes the collabormaive research irvolving the National Research Conn.
cil of Canada (NRC) and deHavilland Inc. on reciprocal
noise transmission measurements. This resoach extends
the work of previous authors by developing, valdailltg,
and demonstrating a reciprocal approach for Measuring
sound transmission through the fuselage on a fuID-l1e
aircraft, As in Mason and Fahy'o work, a monopol snd
soureV is located inside the fuselag,. Sn d non-contactinllg
1iI).
nvestedin
developing Pas.
gle elemettra
of the fuselage surface. Excellent agreementa
ductWo aircraft. Noie rdeducimn of several df AI are
has been obtlined between direct anid reciprocal measurAitaledo h a total
woeig
penlty of tie ofIkilograsm.
"alotwith ihe cat of the aWooatld hardwia",
ment,
V.
d,
2 1 -3
"/
scuest
..
..
,.
. Trila
awlv
/Omrq-
-.
aj
'.--,iILI
hI t
meluein--.el
lp
_______________thusi
ewaswqim
I i,
slore,
,,
iropii.t
I~v~e
~lellim lai~FIgsoe
*nl
:'
-hfuseiage,
quired ranget ofl operatling speds of the wpepl~lt. hladedlugltabrul. cllimb anld crulise
Is order to reduce the nis level further, vaious active
M'C-
LA_ _
cancrlalonllli fANM
the
Smoutule
Sto
liew
edue
l iale nr
b aI
.leed
m
acievedll
in ilas
a
inuutaultca
oe
areslstatd
Fgue .
*
*
11 The tas
rpml ricu he used s anl tlapelt, so tha uilt~sely narrollwlb baud enntrnlssa eain he Imporeed with eor
'p
lglme
tad perflusutnre !t
speteew
ltlla haebr light
Engan
1tsdl.
flgh test
ailarlvlrelt&
kTheil ltasl tustala tonl rae helll
eapeid
to wuigh Rim
klogramsfor les, hra cost i betweenISKn
Whb sin appoac hamlbee meemfuly light teste.
thee, ar si a (O dlmaduamragpm I aditio to wig
anld seur. It is di u to Intgrt a lag nmberw of
i
spabsL ure
the p uswsl coparuu. There hi
a traded betee reduce qebe reeoes sou and
eeec.
Tb reaibt aid utluuuae cos cR lb
spnasml rettet he
t qantihed. flu . %h tests. haive
show that thesytml
wedslbto leeea cciib ralinell
heL, wichkl sv dmqtilseily
highin a llturbpro ei
iId
ea
his In to hel espected Sec cabl aceis
e asv so
4 a"
21-4
typically included in the cost function of an ANC system.
An alternative active approach that is currently being investigated by DIII and NRC is to use structural actuators
to control the fuselage vibration [7]. The active vibroacoustic system is also shown in Figure 5, where a cutitro!
force is used to reduce the structural vibration that creates the sound. This approach has the advantage that
few actuators are needed, since the vibratiou need only
be controlled where the propeller disturbance is highest.
This immediately translates into a weight saving. Further
advantages can be realixed if feedback of structural motion 6s used rather than of the internal sound held. Similar
noise reductions can be achieved, but with a siampler, less
intrusive system. Because the transfer functions involved
are simpler, robustness is improved, and simple control
laws can be used. Simulationo with a simple analytical
model iodic~te that a noise reduction of 10 dHA can be
achieved with a relatively small number of pieoelectrie
actuators bonded to fuselage frames 11]. (iptimisation of
actuator andi sensor nunmbers and loc-ations will be dreter
mined basedl on a measurement model
As with the other noise reduction tecnittues. design times
atud therefore cost can be reduiceti with a detailed analytical model. Such a model call onlly be used reliably foe
design if it is valaiWae by measure dlar at some toint is
the desin ptocerso Th'lerefore. it is necsary to ronider
simple appr~hoae to owiaiait measuredI data for MOde
val~idatio. Thle rveiplooiy ltehnique descr ibdhrevin cans
a4s be use for evaluation of noise rVedntia techniqueso
inl ground teting119
YO
t~.euad
t
pelle FWMIese
he,
00Olth
eare
e .A ~sfe4
Atht
khil Mbti
toIerAOe in11"teMCti
- timi f 0
6the s*a
oet*
illosst
h
wap.senuie
as
in ~~ ~
~ i ~h asn.
~ a ~the"W4i
~ ntl
etd
~ 1s
Maitoobw khe
flv.
1r*0u
pinlls, pmenr- heldOF*hihsts"oivi
catrfai
low VW44W 1 e,
heM him
ilI
S.bem uwi
laanhp.estppw
VW6ao #&So
these sa *asu
wnech iwl lPAW -1 1160 OMVfut
the, ruIn&.f fWunctOn QI1Q. heat "ea uncM~s.
is Niea used Tb.O t0t4l tuuMed nutb in. alatalnar Ie cOrN;
p a a ideeSh n as.a ed i a
1nt
ths laheatia "kt the ewupet.. pisthel Ow
NWmAO
VO&I IIPinswae"haJ abe-ee %r" fi-mea. dW00tnf
owloPO1
IUt&ft
omo
* "UMPMtei
01i1060P
that
M191*0111
i
boiP11 was
vuieth
he mb m. .eAflOW
tewmuv i
tv* aN
Is O oenae
PrOtahant
mk
ai
"*wIa
tha
t Oe Few"a
4W WV~g
nu
t"W&Us16k
*M
eam**tgtbg
%6ia
1-1&0 Mf V Qk *"amq.
an the,
WOWhjm
21-5
needed, then an adequate prediction of 11, could be obtainied by measu,-ing Q. over a much smaller number of
elements.
6"Speakers
__
f 1
h Q.
3
3
where v,1Q. is the response from the internal volume yelocity source to a point velocity measurement taken usinig
an acccelerometer located at the point of force application,
'This result could be used to evaluate the contribution to
the interior noise due to engine imbalance and wving vibration loads being transmitted into the internal acoustic
field through the wing-box.
4.1
4.3
Exper~isnet Equipment
Aircraft Misolagts
"rite
Capachtnuersn
Prohos
21-6
Aluminumshaied
R
t4
~
Fo~am
Ainneiftskin
ptotae
ao~-Microphone
loataion,
Figurcr I0
n-ShenlatiC of external sound source used for
reciprocit %-rification.
Yra
450
Atircraft.
Fis~uret \eeeattittltc
e a~aeean~' prlce.fot cirfce.
Faixtait
Itat
Notiostute-clirts.
ivsit
"~
-Af
~
-.
Co.*
II
prb
itttr
lriceular t.are in thIe tleeaige eel tilt- horn uuuut lIse p~aid to
,he atillclity tif the,eAt- lortwevtu the hrit hanil the aircraft.
--
No#.5
g
.1
j
to
rac-arlcy Atiemnentuc
imuiratud that the, total force apfcleac tot
uthkretivrtee
nver jai othear eleanec-uiuea
I roughly one third tit
thiet appliAl to theadooieaerciael
c-ement. lahuua
it t ik elyBthAit
~xt'rneet
1.4eietit~ Sinesthe
1nl
otW
4ettthe 40 gesale
144ts
M
at ther nsAaet Of
the hucte -%e
gitualcewith A tt exi6cen wanlo
* ac*n t6o1
Mwlaata
4the. a c
%te
lose
, "Ine
shir fee-sentoo 4 tOpe
sha-letio Nc he
lon
11001t 10IMRialpucclt
Otu-eVVIArthenhat fthe* hi- oeetc as
Itc-uitsatritct. 14tt iote4preica)
anti
a
eeIte
"Is " t1e ceraot lcascut
theatate-rita) isacacnatolrec-
did
agae-W
'
a
~~1
--.....-I
K
21-7
-I
491
i~~i
45"'$
.443
--
I ,\
20e
250
3ce
Fmqszmcy
(HZ) 330
400
450
9005
trespect
II
log
[.
tengitudlnal
"In
W
s
25P
.;_
Fm.Swf (51
Figure 12: Element reciprocity verification, near locatiot. Direct transfer function (solid) and reciprocal (dashed). Both magnitude and phase are shown,
Results comparitg the transfer function between external
presure excited by tile horn and internal pressure, anti
between internal volume velocity geuvratedt by the tdodec-ahedron source Anld the external surface vibration ien.
stare by the capacitanct'e probe are shown in Figure 12,
The magnitude anti phase is shown for an interior loca.
tion close to the excitation point. Excellent agreenment
is obtained. Note that while it is only the magnitude of
the final predictiot p, that is imuportant, the phase of
the transfer functions that ase used to make this estitnate
are critical in order to cocrectly performn the sum in Equation (U) Furthermore, the gtood phase agreement provides
additional verification of the Accuracy of reciprocity,
6
Semi Rnnltits
6.1 Procdurv
TWO dodtec'lhtilrou Noise wiltifees were kK,.l in Ihe, (
"uses)
_______________A;
.rithe
-';
,q',
\/--
ittisibbhurinl Cements.
Voxeach ease, the internal noise that would have re-ulted
had the diaturlhaee frequency dlhfferett by a few percent
was coutpulvd. The owastued d&1&were u e" as different
frntquretnrt in additio to thatdatal
tltt ,
atver the ef-
21-8
10-
0.(
-20-
(-
-30
0.92
--
0.94
.4
0.96
19
3.98
1
1.02
NW.54kfl8 Fr8equeny
U~
2
1.04
1.06
2.04
2.05-.
1.09
Figure 14: Normalized internal noise prediction at Iocation I (solid) and location 2 (dashed). At 1xBPF (uipper) acd 2x B PF (lower). The frequency of ititrest is
shown by the dot ted line.
lowver rpm
higher rpm
near
2.1
0.0
Table 1: Average predicted intetnal noise levels for dififerent engine rpmi, at I andi 2xliPF, andi at a near internal
point andi a far one, (113(A) with respect to tile I x BPF
respotnse at the near location for the higher rpm..
:2
1.2
09
1.4
1.
0.98
1
1.02
NomalSiZdFrequency
.'2
1.04
106
1.00
215
2.0*6
2.08
0.4
95
5.3
1' 'F
near
0tt0
1.0
0.7
-0.5
-1.9
Noise (liff)
2 xBPF
far
near far
Ott0-00.0 0.0
1.9
0.2 -t0.,1
1.9 S.6
0.6
1.9
1.2 6.9
1.8
7.1 5.7
Cultls
21-9
structural actuators holds promise.
A reiprcal echiquewasuse
to easre e nise
transmission charactcristics of an aircraft fuse'age. This
approach can be used for validating computer inedels, or
for evaluating noise reduction methods. The fuselage was
*iivided into a number of scant elements, and the transfer
function between interior noise and the response on each
element was combined- with a specified external propeller
pressure field to predict the interior noise at specified locations. The approach uses a aionoipole noise source inside the airc~aft, and a capacitance probe to measure the
luselage surface response. The approach was validated
by conmparing the direct transfer function for one element
with the reciprocal measurement. Excellent agreement be-.
tween these mleasureentl~s was obtained.
PP. 23-32.
[12] V6r, 1, L,, "Soen( Uses of Reciprocity in Acoustic
moving thos, used, would be useful in obtaining noise predictiotrs throughout the cabin,
Measurements andi Diagtosis," iii Inicr.Noisqe, (Munich), Sept. 1985, pp, 1311-1314.
[13] Bleranek, L.. L.. andl VWr. 1, L., Noise and V-ibraion Conitrol Enginer-ring. Principles and Appli'uWiley, New York, 1992.)
Acknwledeitints
Acknwingwuitstionsq,
The reciprocity work was a collabirative research and
d,,velopment project withI NRC itud dell avillamid Itic.
Dr. Frank Slisigvrlautd at NRCtplayed atminst rumtental role
in developing this technique. 'FTheassistautmc
of L uc II urtubise, Michael llairanowski, and numerous othetrs at NRC
is greatly appreciated. Work on noise reductiontiat 1)111
itivolved Rajph Garcea, Hay Woug, and many ut hers,
[1]
(2]
13]
(4]
(n]
23-
I SUMMARY
A hign-frequency theory (advanced statistical energy
analysis ( ASEA )) is developed which takes account of
the mechanism of tunnelling and uses a ray theory
approach to track the power flowing around a plate or a
beam network and then uses statistical energy analysis
(SEA) to take care of any residual power. ASEA
divides the energy of each sub-system into energy that
is freely available for transfer to other sub.systems and
energy that is fixed within the sub-system. The theory
allows for coupling between sub-systems that are
physically separate and can be interpreted as a series of
mathematical models, the first of which is identical to
standard SEA and subsequent higher order models are
convergent on an accurate prediction. Using a structural
assembly of six rods as an example, ASEA is shown to
converge onto the exact results whilst SEA is shown to
overpredict by up to 60 dB.
2 INTRODUCTION
Statistical energy analysis ( SEA ) has been su~ccssflully
applied to many noise and vibration problems. In
particular SEA has become very useful as a framework
for interpreting a vibro-acoustic data base. SEA often
leads to a better understanding of the problem and SEA
can point the way to practical solutions. However when
used as a purely predictive theory, without the recourse
to measured data, SEA has not been universally
successful. Nevertheless in some cases it has been very
successful, for example when used to model the
interaction between the noise In a room and its vibrating
walls, but when applied to complex structural assemblies
SEA predictions have often exhibited errors. Then
errorm have been thought due to the fact that plates and
beams are usually strongly coupled and one of the
assumptions within standard SEA theory (see. for
example Lyon' ) is that all couplings are weak.
However. Keane and Price2 conclude that this
assumption should be replaced by the necessity that no
individual mode within a given sub.system should
dominate the overall response of that sub-system, and
this requirement can be met eiterd by assuming weak
coupling or by assuming the presence of many
interacting modes. Furthermore, if SEA theory is
developed using the wave approach rather than the
modal apprach this weak coupling assumption does not
appear to be required ( ae for example Heron).
Amw*Wve at a Spapouia.on Vwa
~tct
-~
--
23-2
we arc attempting to
tunnelling phenomenon that SThe
AeP
ewhich
Mi,. -
(2)
,n-,
t//-n',
1
2qz
n01
+nIM
"1'12l
-n'l'-
2.,n
R3
(3)
b +n'sl1"
iL
.I
,1.
23-3
Using the column vectors e and d as the field variables,
ASEA can be encapsulated by the following two matrix
equations
Ae
A_
Me
free power
free power
free power
to free
input
lost
(4)
power
+A)(M-B)-'M
free power
to fired
fixd poper
input
(10)
Md
(9)
and
transfer
Be
Ae
fixed power
lost
to zero.
6
power
transfer
and in order to better understand these equations we
have attached a physical description to each of the terms.
The above equations form the basis for ASEA theory
and this paper is mainly concerned with the calculation
procedure for the A and the B matrices,
It may be thought that the somewhat arbitrary use of M
in the second equation involves an assumption but this
is not so since we have yet to specify the precise
defin -n of B and Q, and the requirement to conform
with equation (5) creates those definitions,
(6)
R -(M-11)(M.A)"P
(7)
Ej
(12)
where
(13)
wheo
A)(M -f)"M(e. , a P
(8)
the
'
A.'z
23-4
cj
Pi " TF
exp (e )c
exp(LxM
)- - exp(
-M,)
(18)
(19)
(9
P,.,
exp( -xrf)Pj
(20)
, p(
power balance.
~,
(16)
P.
manner
SWhem
Sq.i-,
-P
- 'J
Srod
(17)
23-5
e
4n "parts
(22)
(27
.)
-' T,(()sin(*,)d*,
(28)
e'__e "
(29)
2X M'
(30)
aK -b'c
SLkasin(*,)
P.,
(23)
_rXwhere
K *W W ,
C"
P4,*
lengths.
Finally
km(#)koc~o(3)
Again At this point it is worth keeping in mind the
stadard SEA theory which for plates proceeds a
follows
an
(32)
COMPARISON
WITH
ANALYTICAL
RSULTS
ASEA produc a dlfftent result dependent on the
a sub-syslem that
number of trwisfeu of power aros
we am modelling. hibinumber which is alo one Im
and this
III
(26)
P0. p.,.p,,
(31)
X-104 P,,d,
and
DP1
lI
iaml mnml
23-6
(33)
SEA is stnucture
dependent.
CONCLUSIONS
9-r
--
_"
..
23-7
i
i~i
1987, pp363-386
3
pp30 9.337
6 Hodgs C.H. and Woodhouse. L..Rep. Pr.
49. 19M6. pplO7.170
J7
Phy&.
iP63746
8
rit
wn CnCWrg
1994 / DRA
1,.... ....
"
23-8
00
-10
-10
soo
,_,Co.-,
-150
'
'0
-Vh4
is th exact result.
where
..
and
I.
is tw ASEA 2 pedictio
2.4-1I
IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AIR. AND STRUCTURE-BORNE NOISE AND VIBRATION PATHS
Herman Van der Auweraer
Katrien Wyckaefl
Peter van der Linden
Dirk Otte
LMS International
Interleuvenlaan 68
B-3001 Heverlec
BELGIUM
1. SUMMARY
In order to investigate the contribution of individual
sources and source transmission paths, a method
referred to as "Transfer Path Analysis" hi bee
deeIOk~Cd. Its formulation ito address stulrchri
noise problems is outlined in detail and illustrated with
an example from the car industry. Current research in
this context is briefly reviewed, including the case of
reciprocity techniques and the air-homne noise problem.
L.PRE.FACE~
The optimisainit with respect to interior noie is
currently a toic of Smuat conwcer for the automnotive
industry. An ssential element in this prucess is to
obtan a correc understanding of the varuwam*nis
Owners which are pmesnt. and of the ways. in Wisbch
these MWOer are Pprop*atd 10 the enial" recIVer
kwaloxdominant
Wherat the physial "atmrof the importan muse
geueali"S *WtMeate in genera 0-V-knosin and
inhernt to the vehicle ujicationi ipos'r itrain notse and
V61111111"
Of whelrniineati
UA ond
in0M AMsprolpelle Of
fan nowe, turtulent bayti ntswiisn aircaft. _ i. the
COrrec quantfleatio 01 these %*Mte strngths,1% Mnd the
quantficatwin of the Portia contrltNAWtwit
of c htitothese
source to the OVeral MWs level M in srwrA aml
vmbila-e
To Wdskes thasa
prulem. a mcbuiksgih~ly. releasd to a
Ttmassl
Path Am4l-Ai. has been tkvekiWd andl
i"VInetiatd. which 36%ati *4 21csey
the
ft
W1100
of W qidi of~w
tdoat: individWual
rs
oin
hrenth
and a
PJArta 016W cointrifitio zwlysss 1111 So (w. the
mtetho has k.%appliedl IWiialt to the Anayss ol
w'twctrek'ww ft prhiblenss ' he tawwoii 'MW
qlstucl"A
umeaof esmcid" xs'the "ai %*03wo
acout
%)%kem bsyineaiu 011 ftliiws% U11'
11CM
th
tyactcly ech daisesio at eah mou- kcatiual th"
defines a warawnissaii path. Typi cul pkfipswe
COSin udWAKMn teAseMd tlq
S W Mnuwo
p0%s.1
vatraaintmns. and ca mad vilvaucn trnsmitdW
fthr kg.win.. wAits. Awbceiatic ftum awmai
Of thie %Wlurc'hmu annu gtta 01 COSMICe.
witeCk.
the axwuracof
avMik
*At
ivwutn. Mn 19W
24-2
X,
different possible
considering ni-pal/I
transmission paths over which energy coming from a
single reference source, can be transmitted into the car
body. the total operational pressure p at a given target
When
X.
FI
',:
'
L
-F
151.
(I
4. MULTIPLE REFERENCE TRANSMISSION
PATH ANALYSIS
or
(2)
Islr
K=
.. ,,.)
(5)
i.iu
ilb,.,.]ll"
I[S,,
Is.]
.,,
IuI)
daiil
(diagonall
utpwf
auttotiwer
ctmptsitttly. andisjs.
matrix
mrx
and
o tl he
Is'[xlhowe
infg
S.-,- I the
princ'ipal
incpl
re.
24-3
P,
~r X=4v
"'~(p/ (X)Fortunately
2
F,
This is indicated in figure 3. Assessing the influence of
one transmission path, an RMS summation must he
carried out for the partial pressure results in one
transmission path. over all principal cornponeiits.
S. USIROF MICHANICAL-ACOUSTI
RECIPROCITV
It can be interesting (touse an alternative approach fo
the measurements of mcchanical-acoustic transfer
functions: reciprocal measurements,1%
The resptonse it( structures and sound fields can bereciprocal. This basically means, that the same relationIs
between input and output11 quantitieis are measured when
the excitation energy is brought Into the systemt at the
output tidle. In literature, several applic~ations (if
reciprocal measurements on a Wid rag of
constructions, from pruducion machinery lto aircraft.
have heen reported 11.71. For mcaia-cutc
transefe function mcasiuremens tm %aw
bodic%, truck
cahm.
ollwinec.,the
fcbktD1%
,.
~d:attached
2~.couplings.
Q*
(NII
(/
A typical example ul a conipariamn between dmieand
24-4
"h.'
~P=
th
nl~tP1
,
1
LQ1J
P
(e),modifications
many cases, such as the one where the acoustic source 'is
spalially distributed, and due to a complex radiation
surface
(e.g. an engine block or exhaust, or a tyre), this
is impractical to do.
A far more versatile and practical method of
measurement is again hLwed on the application of
reciprocity, Hereto, a sound source is placed at the
targeted receiver location (e.g. the position of the head
of a passenger in the vehicle, or an exterior microphone
used to quantify the radiated noise). and sound pressures
can he measured in a fine grid around the radiating
surfaices Ityres. engintes. exhaust.*..t..
As far as the source sIrengths arm considered. il I
usually vutually impossible to measure them directly in
operation, anid current invstigatios 191 we perfmed
onho)w lcal prssures measured near the sourc.s can be
usd in conmhinatim with reciprocal FRF measurements.
The re.ctniihaio of s.ourie strengtho
s and FRFs into
partial pres.sure responses can then be done in a
vcttorial way at lower frequencwi's or piwer-only (third
tcavc fix example) way at higher frequcw.'ies. A
sclhematic,overview o4 the measurement of the
transminsion path FMFx for a truck engine towards an
exlerior ISO microphone is giveo in figure 7.
The vrr.sponding derivation ot souce strengths I1m.
po.ure,"c measurecInt't and
near tIsd citol,
rectp. al FRtJ is given in ig.re i9, Results nwmasurd
om engine mc(;k.ups are dl.uvd In I4l.
1. INIEI)AN(I: MOI;II.IN(;
T1V mctho1s di-scussd Absw all have In coesnrim that
the actual vkbro-aXoustiv ,ysem under .tudy is
charictri,sd by FMs. In the higher frequency ranges
where the atowtic phoeomettn ar III`releva.ce. this is
24-5
24-6
I1.REFERENCES
1i1 Multipath Sound Transferfrom Resiliently Mounted
Shipboard Machinery, PhD Dissertation. J. Verhey,
1986
[31
Suspension Analysis in View of Road Noise
Optimisation, W. Hendricx, D. Vandenbroeck. Proc. of
the 1993 Noise and Vibration Conference. SAE P-264.
Travers" City, p. 647-652
191
(101
I. ACKNOWLEIIXWMENTS
This woak was partially sponmsord by the Eurnlwtan
Commission. in the framework of the BWfTE EURAM
prgpmraits (ANRAVA. BE 593.1. DIANA, BE 44.16. and
. . ....
..
._ A
24-7
S1-..
II
24-8
0/,
X,
transformation
/ x'2
reference set
,"
"slave
[S.'1 cfosspowor mratrix
partially
principal
NJ aulopower matrix
coherent
reference
signals
component
analysis
orthogonal
reference
set
I, I single reference crosspower matri)
II
principal components
X,
X.,
ptincipal
component
docompositorn
10orCO
AV"
3 Sd
CpMWato
H2?1
e
f.41f
nce
~~
24-9
S...A..
c tto
-.
IJe~~t
...
'J
alJI
..
il*~I-
S........~~............-..
ll*
.,.
I...
1'
),.,
:l
t.
....
. ...
Ido
24-10
"" '
......
N ".
',-
Figure 11
A
*~~.
complex
dynamic
stiffness
ad
measured
e~we
Decomposition in 6 pnci0ul
Figure 10
components (6 mechanical references) summed
-.
...
.................
I'~
on
An1
24-11
10dB
26-1
Abstract
Im'pulsive forces applied to an aircraft
fuselage generate radial vibration waves in the
structure anaiogous to those In aclassia thin shell. It
has been found that these waves are detected by the
cockpit area microphone, anid that spectrogramn
analysis of the microphone recording can provide
informat ion on the nature, origin and strength of the
source, whether an explosion or a sudden
decompression.
INTRODUCTION
In-flight
accidents of aircraft are often difficultto diagnose. The breakup of an aircraft at high
altitude creates awidely dispersed wreckage trail, and
dispersal of such a trail indeep ocean can further limit
the amount of significant debris which can be
recovered. For example, undersea debris search is
still continuiing at the site of the Air India disaster
which occurred in1985. However the aircraft'stIlight
recorders are relatively easy to recover, using their
radio or sonar transponders. This paper describes a
new method of analyzing the cockpit area
microphone (CAM) record from the cockpit voiceI.-:
recorder (CVR) which yields the following Information:
- The cause of the disaster is clearly distinguished as
either astructural failure or an explosive detonation
('bomb").
- The causal event is located along the fuselage to an
___
.-
41
7.
-
._____.......______________
60
and0030
Tm.mlieod
_FIG. Ia: Voltage -Time record of event 1
aie 5b
A \
A A
. AJI\
J\I
V.
;:vV.
: :,1
0
2
4
6
9
10
T",mlieod
FIG. 1lb: Expanded record, start of event 1
------
7-
I..-..
.....
....
__............__
-
.--.-..
*.-..
100
2ieO 30d. 0
ilscod
FIG. 1c: Voltage - Time record of event12
identified
atpresent, because ofcontinuing litigation
surrounding the events. All have a certain family
'Im)npact
r f Acouslic Inads (in Aircraft Sit tibanres' held in Lillehannimer, NorwaY, Mfav 1994.
26-2
resemblance. Each begins with a few cycles of almost
pure slnusoid at a frequency between 450 and 700
Hz, depending on aircraft type and flight attitude. (It
was these slnusoids which led the writer to realize that
these were vibration signatures; not airborne sound
signals). The records then show a sudden transition
---
100
20 40 so
Classical cylindrtcal shell theory provides a useful qualitative understanding of the various modes
of radial vibration which may be excited by a localized
zone of under - or overpressure. They are
characterized by Integral numbers, n, of sine waves
200
Time, milliseconds
300
..
"velocities of the n .
-,1
,I-"
.7
:aircraft
.tfrequency,
________________.__..........._____
20
g
oo
Time, milliseconds
40
1201o
250
250
200.
150.
.
u
r_
.
2
I
4L
0'
0L
50.
0.5
1,0
1,5
2,0
26-3
-I
.o.
""i .
IVI
'
...
Timemi.lie.ond
050
100
Time, milliseconds
150
26-4
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
Ev
1,5k
A new algorithm for spectrogram generation the Wigner distribution (2), Is being examined with a
view to Improving spectrogram readability. The
2,
2.bo-b
lk -
""
-.... ,
U- 500
decomp.
Event 3, decoip.
100
200
300
CONCLUSIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
26-5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author acknowledges with appreciation
thu encouragement and support of Mr. Bernard
Caiger of the NRC Flight Recorder Laboratory, and of
Mr. Michael Poole ot the Flight Recordor/Computer
section of the Transportation Safety Board of Canada.
The work has been financed by the National
Research Council of Canada, and the guidance of Dr.
W. Wallace and ol Dr. G.F. Marsters of the Institute for
Aerospace Research (NRC) has also been very
helpful.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
ADDENDUM
Identification of "Events"
Event
Description
1.
Air India Boeing 747 fit. 183 lost west of Ireland June 3, 1985 - bomb.
2.
Briefcase bomb aboard a Boeing 727-200 on flight iRome - Athens. March 1986.
3.
4.
Pan Am Boeing 747 fit. 103 lost over Lockerbie. Scotland, December 21. 1988 bomb.
5.
Mac-D. DC 10 (Turkish) rear cargo door loss near Paris France. March 3, 1974.
it
z~q
41
ho
-a.0)
tuy
\4'
'J
2. Originator's Reference
AGARD-CP-549
S. Originator
3. Further Reference
ISBN 92-836-0001-0
4. Security Classification
UNCLASSIFIED
6. Title
8.AuthortsV/Fditorts)
September 1994
Multiple
10. Author'sl~ditor's Addres
Multiple
12. Distribution Statement
1i. Page"
2X2
There are no restrictions onl the distribution of this docum~ent.
Information about the availability of this and other AGARI)
unclassified publication%is given on the hack cover.
Structural design
Structural analys-is
Acousiti fatigue
Thermal fatigue
Sub-sonlic flow
Super-sonic flow
Ilyper-sollit flow
Aerodynam~ics
14, Abotract
A broad bind of differentt activitiesi was addressed in the Specialists Meeting held by the
Structures and Miaterial% Pawld of AGARI) in May 191M4
Topics dealing witht the acoustic tnviroonlent in sub., super- atnd hylt-amril: flow regimes.
innovativs- structural design tec:hniques andi material% I'm fatigue fcsistant structurvs.
E.xpcrimetital and analytical tools for evaluation to(the hehaviour of structures in anl
tcoustically and thermally advor.
rc tiirounment.
'
%)~
0*
'c
o E~ a 79
zs
L4
*x
C)
~E
>
m-a
.2
*%
-~
0\
<<
o
00
Va
r-V
r
zu
'
-;2
" -
>
>
>
oU
c,
g~ 02~
-~~
c
0
m~
QE
-0
-j
o
-C
r-
r-
00
U,0
.7
.0
!o0
..
;50
0.-
-0o
'1
.-
-1
OO
C)
0'.-
<
-i-
NATO
7 RUE ANCELLE
OTAN
92200 NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE
DIFlII1SION DS1)
11L'IIICA'IIONS
FRANCE
._
_______--
--
.\nc nil sitock de pulllllicalloll, lta eskic :k ,\ARI). A parfir de 199)3. A) AR!) dileiiira in stock miiif dles pubhlicat~ions i~soiciccs ;i1i\ cdes
E anIi r tie 199,i
cosl
ii
spec ia5ll\in't (ie le, .. GAR Iogriaphies ct ics rappoirt% des pritilfis de tratv~il.orgi iiiscs e(i pahN ie
di.tlticeI
iilct5t
t
IWii'
lre ;ircssi~s I A( ARD pasr It'I Ie on par tax~'I It'adress i id iqu&t citldewssts Iclc
tiiiii
cierus Ieielilmemimtisiiivri
tic)
I e ii i
diffuistion ninifle dt: (owes le, puhlicitions de i'MAi\RI csi icliiccue alipre-s dies pays ,uinilircs de Ii)IAN par
;ii'
wti/i l/ 'w it I
peliveli parloi, iis re ililwtlis
)lienlaire,
I'merrineditiiIC ties. t-eufrt's tic distribuftion nil inauai indiqnitis ci-de~ssiiis. Decs memepllairc, uppl
is
hs Si sunst smiliii.ilet rcces iir tolmes le, pnislicilins tic I'A)AR)). oil siiiilenteicl tles
Ilipres tiei des ct-iils (a rewcepiinor dies,
lili tilicerileli cettains PI'ictI. ', Mis pokiiise dlemander aitire nciii stir fit lisle, dleittii tici intm de ces cenniis. Les prublicatuions tic !'AGtARI
(iistusfisrme ide ihiifocopsie oiii tie iiicriilicie.
'antI ell veilic mlilrt's des igcltuc Iiidiites ci-idesouii
N-2(0)7 K~jc'ilr
PAYS-BAS
Net'ierlanrdts IDlegaiion it) MGARI)
Nat tonal Aerospace Laboratory- NLR
I\ 1\ \(AARI) Publications)
I inio Rosalecs 3.4
'51MOS1Madrtid
i:T.\ rs NI'.
NAVSA\ It idqriarters
C ode JO01I)I
WZ dii n liii. D.C. 201546
SR:\NU I.
( ).N .LRA. i lircLIitii1
e t'hi D~ivisioin Lectlerc
-1). Aventi
2
i 32('1i31 1111(tile
1)itt
DO
Centro dciite11i.
loiitaio
Tlelitaqxto e ifol
AIfraejdc
2701) .. madorat
ROYALAIE-U NI
lDc~cnce Research Iniffrmaiott
Keniiiierts H ouse
(cc5IBroswn Si reef
em~w(12 SEX
'Centre
-
G~~~R : FG
lilleItic AiTUire'~RQUIF
l,
Mil~li Salvitionia I3;akatliili ) NIS1l I
Au\t X ir (Ililqcu
AR( F Ditires i IBakan Ii d )iMSiBi
SCICiVitIic Mi intl ICiic llm .ihr~ir%
0)66501 Hik~inflikkar-Anikarii
I )eck:t'Aia.\r I-iirce IBise
1010)
I eiselia. Ailietis I)
Le.tert'itre dct dliiribifliion natimniIl des Etals.) ni%nrut' lient P'AS de' stocks des piihlic'aiiuns ile I'.A ARI).
itieint tire inoittilce iiiretiemnetl ltipries LiltiNASA C'enter o~r .'\roSpae' hiiiirmiiimiint
'tIIit-Iles &IItI:Vtle tie 111tiltitipi, c
i(ASI)
1:,SA/Itiibtrtisatlio
Reiriev-id Service
Uiripeaii SpimeLAIWenex
Ii0. rue Mlariit Nikis
\1)
2,ii0902t) 44
fits
.1'[ t\lrginll
I
us
74;015 Pans
Sprinclcliel
22 (if
I icessihle egaiieirisenii
tn10111 iliicractfit damt Iii base die
doliiities hihhiisi2rhpluslque, tnl liLI1e iii NI'IS. ci stir C'D-ROM)