Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
BUSINESS SCHOOL
SMART
Strategy how will we get there?
PEST FRAMEWORK
Political / legal
Economic
Monopolies legislation,
Environmental protection laws,
Taxation policy, Foreign trade
regulations, Employment law,
Government stability
Socio-cultural
Population demographics,
Income distribution, Social
mobility, Lifestyle changes,
Attitudes to work and leisure,
Consumerism, Levels of
education
Government spending on
research, Government and
industry focus of
technological effort, New
discoveries / development,
Speed of technology transfer
FACTORS
Political
Economic
Socio-Cultural
Technological
CURRENT
ISSUES
TRENDS
DISRUPTIONS
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Dynamic
Long-Term
Profit Rate
Attractiveness of
Industry
Structure
+
-
Competitive
Advantage
or Disadvantage
Environment
Cost disadvantages
Independent of scale
Technology
Raw materials
Locations
Experience
Expected retaliation
CUSTOMERS
SUPPLIERS
INTERNAL RIVALRY
Concentrated suppliers
Product is critical to buyer
No substitutes
Threat of forward
integration
Industry structure
Lifecycle stage
Lack of differentiation or switching costs
Level of cooperation
Strategic groups
Exit barriers
THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
What are the potential substitutes?
What future impact will they have?
Is the performance or cost position of substitute improving?
Concentrated customers
Product undifferentiated
Switching costs are low
Buyers have full information
Buyers industry earns low
profits
Buyers threaten backward
integration
Product unimportant to buyer
Product presents a significant
proportion of buyers costs
Growth
Shakeout
Maturity
Decline
Early
Adopters
Entry of
Competitors
Selective
Purchase
Saturation
Drop-Off
in usage
Fight for
share
Strong
Competition
Fight to
maintain
share
Exit of
some
competitors
Undifferentiated
products
Pricecutting for
volume
Efficiency,
low cost
Few
Competitors
Threat of substitutes
Bargaining power of
suppliers
Bargaining power of
buyers
Bargaining power of
Consumers
Overall competitive
intensity
Low
Med
High
Strategic options
POWERFUL SUPPLIERS
Diversify supply base
Reduce supplier costs
Standardise requirements
Integrate backwards
NEW ENTRANTS
Build entry barriers
Watch out for mavericks!
INTERNAL RIVALRY
Strengthen competitive advantage
Re-segment
Outsource to reduce fix costs
Acquire competitors with care!
POWERFUL BUYERS
Select customers
Build customer switching costs
- specifications
- relationships
- service
Integrate forward
SUBSTITUTES
Understand customer
preferences before reacting
Critically examine indirect
substitutes
Consider diversification
New Entrant
Threats
Supplier
Power
Internal Rivalry
Substitute
Threats
Buyer
Power
Consumer
Power
Old Game
Porters
Five Forces
New types of
cooperation
and competition:
more than arms
length competition
New sources of
value: competitive
advantages no
longer based only
on structural
advantages
Increasing
uncertainty:
todays industry
structure is
probably not a
good indicator
of the future
Frontline execution
Creating value by consistently outperforming
competitors in the execution of day-to-day tasks
through cost, quality, or time
Insight/
foresight
Codependent systems
Privileged
relationships
Industry
structure/
conduct
Traditional arms
length
Frontline
execution
Structural
advantage
Basis of
competition
Structural advantage
Traditional
microeconomic
assumption that
creating value is
only possible by
exploiting structural
advantages over
competitors and
potential industry
entrants due to
scale, know how,
technology,
patents, market
access, etc.
Insight/
foresight
Codependent systems
Frontline
execution
Privileged
relationships
Industry
structure/
conduct
Traditional arms
length
Uncertainty
Structural
advantage
Basis of
competition
Codependent systems
Privileged
relationships
Industry
structure/
conduct
Traditional arms
length
Porters Five
Forces as basis of
new approach
Basis of competition
Competitive price
wants
Service
Reassurance
PESTER
WHAT ARE
THEY DOING?
INDUSTRY
ANALYSIS
PERFORMANCE
( FINANCIAL, SHARE,
SALES, ETC )
CURRENT STRATEGY
CORE COMPETENCES
COMMITMENT
COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGES
HISTORY AND
ASSUMPTIONS
IMPLICATIONS
FOR US?
HOW SHOULD
WE RESPOND?