Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
OBJETIVOS
O objetivo desta disciplina apresentar as principais teorias e conceitos das Relaes
Internacionais. Pretendemos expor e debater a especificidade da rea de Relaes Internacionais,
explorar os limites de seu objeto de estudo e refletir sobre o desenvolvimento terico da prpria rea.
Aps esta introduo ao universo terico das Relaes Internacionais, os alunos devero ser capazes
de identificar os principais correntes tericas da rea, alm de aplicar conceitos chave na
problematizao e compreenso de fenmenos da realidade internacional. O presente curso
organizado por unidades temticas e contar com 15 sesses dedicadas a aulas expositivas e a
discusses de textos. A avaliao ocorrer por meio de duas resenhas e um curto trabalho final.
PROGRAMA
Unidade I:
A rea de RI e suas especificidades
Unidade 3:
O paradigma liberal
KEOHANE, Robert. Instituiciones internacionales y poder estatal. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor
Latinoamericano, 1993, p. 13-38.
KRASNER, Stephen. Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening
variables. In: KRASNER (Ed.). International Regimes. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1983,
p. 1-21. PDF
RUGGIE, John G. Multilateralism: the anatomy of an institution. International Organization,
v. 46, n. 2, p. 561-598, 1992. PDF
Leitura complementar:
KEOHANE, Robert. The Demand for International Regimes. International Organization, v.
36, n. 2, p. 325-355, 1982. PDF
MEARSHEIMER, John. The False Promise of International Institutions. International
Security, v. 19, n. 3, p. 5-49, 1994. PDF
Unidade 4:
O Debate Neo-Neo
Leitura complementar:
CHECKEL, Jeffery T. The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World
Politics, v. 50, n. 2, p. 324-348, 1998. PDF
JEPPERSON, R.L.; WENDT, A.; KATZENSTEIN, P.J. Norms, Identity, and Culture in
National Security, p. 33-75. In: KATZENSTEIN, P. (Ed.) The Culture of National Security.
Norms and Identities in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
Unidade 6:
Perspectivas marxistas de Relaes Internacionais
Unidade 7:
Perspectivas reflexivistas de Relaes Internacionais
4
NEUMANN, I.B. Collective Identity Formation: Self and Other in International Relations.
European Journal of International Relations, v. 2, n. 2, p. 139-174, 1996 PDF
Leitura complementar:
JAMESON, F. Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. New Left Review,
v. 146, p. 53-92, July-Aug., 1984. PDF
ASHLEY, Richard. The achievements of post-structuralism. In: SMITH, BOOTH,
ZALEWSKI (1996), p. 240-253.
BLEIKER, R. The Aesthetic Turn in International Political Theory. Millennium: Journal of
International Relations, v. 30, n. 3, p. 509-533, 2001. PDF
SMITH, Steve. The discipline of international relations: still an American social science?.
British Journal of Politics and International Relations, v. 2, n. 3, p. 374-402, 2000. PDF
BUZAN, Barry; LITTLE, Richard. Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual
Project and what to do about it. Millennium, v. 30, n. 1, 19-39, 2001. PDF
Leitura complementar:
TICKNER, Arlene. Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World. Millennium, v. 32, n.
2, p. 295-324, 2003. PDF
SMITH, S. Singing Our World Into Existence: International Relations Theory and September
11. International Studies Quarterly, v. 48, n. 3, p. 504-7, June, 2004. PDF
ZALWESKI, Marysia. All these theories yet the bodies keep piling up: theory, theorists,
theorizing. In: SMITH; BOOTH; ZALEWSKI (1996), p. 340-53.