Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Fakultt Bauingenieurwesen
Earthquake Damage Analysis Center -EDACProfessur Stahlbau
Presented by
First examiner:
Second examiner:
Date of submission:
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Abstract
The main aim of this master thesis is to provide strategies and basic principles for the
mitigation of earthquake damage. It was performed an inside analysis of the situation after
the February 27th, 2010 Maule (Chile) earthquake in the city of Concepcin. An important
subject described in this document is how the lessons learned after the Maule earthquake
can lead in different ways to the mitigation of earthquake damage in other neighboring
regions.
The study itself had different phases. The first one was the analysis of the earthquake
damage in Chile using several information gathered by different authors and also by the
experts from the Earthquake Damage Analysis Center -EDAC- of the Bauhaus-University
Weimar, after the February 27th, 2010 Maule earthquake. The lessons learned after this
seismic and very destructive event was the starting point. All the engineering analysis done
after the earthquake provided useful information for the development of the first phase and
the elaboration of the second and third chapters of this document.
The second phase was a field research done by the author in the city of Concepcin in
Chile, during May of 2012. The objective of the field research was to acquire several data.
With a velocity sensor was obtained noise ambient measurements in different points in the
urban area of Concepcin and also noise ambient measurements in some reinforced
concrete buildings. Afterwards applying the method of Nakamura was possible to obtain the
frequencies and periods. The reason for obtaining the period of the soil was to elaborate a
microzonation map of Concepcin and the aim of calculating the period of the structures was
to have reliable data for the calibration of the numerical models. Also information related to
building stock, structural drawings and seismic features were obtained. In the fourth chapter
is described extensively all the procedures and results.
Besides all the calculations necessary to develop the fifth chapter, in the last phase of
the study was achieve the numerical modeling of four reinforced concrete structures. In this
final phase the elaboration of the last chapter of the document which describes the
interpretation of the case studies for nonlinear analysis was done. It was performed a
numerical modeling (using the software from CSI, ETABS) of the measured buildings for nonlinear analysis, the elaboration of capacity curves on the basis of pushover analysis for two
buildings and the time history analysis for the tallest buildings. All of this led to the
assessment of the effectiveness of possible strengthening or retrofitting measures. Those
techniques are described in the last part of the chapter.
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Acknowledgments
My first and the most important acknowledge goes to the Deutscher Akademischer
Austausch Dienst -DAAD- (German Academic Exchange Service) for the economical support
during the master program in Germany and also the economical support for the field
research in Chile. Especial thanks to my consultant in charge Birgitt Skailes.
Secondly an important acknowledge for Dr.-Ing. Jochen Schwarz. Giving me the
opportunity of working on an interesting Earthquake-Risk subject was valuable. Also the
advising during the completion of the master thesis, his wise comments and accurate
revision was indeed very helpful.
Especial thanks to Dipl.-Ing. Lars Abrahamczyk. The organization of the time and work
frame, planning of the field research, training in the use of the sensors, advising in the
analyze of the data, revision of the modeling of the structures, advising in the calculation, the
revision of the final report and in general the help provided by him, was very important.
I want to acknowledge Danny Lobos for the support in Concepcin, Chile. Especial
thanks to Franco Benedetti for the whole cooperation and help during my research work.
Also thanks to Juan Marcus and Gonzalo Montalva for giving me a lot useful information. My
sincere thanks to Elson Seplveda for helping me in the field work. Finally an especial
acknowledge for Luz Ayala Cceres for the entire help during my time in Concepcin.
Especial thanks to Juan Pablo Ligorra, Enrique Molina and Daniel Cruz for all the
information provided by them related to Guatemala.
ii
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Table of Content
Page
Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... i
Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................................. ii
List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... vi
List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................... viii
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1
2. Hazard assessment and code situation ............................................................................................ 4
2.1 Particularities from source mechanism ............................................................................. 4
2.1.1 South America ............................................................................................................... 4
2.1.1.1 Seismotectonic frame ................................................................................................. 4
2.1.1.2 Significant earthquakes in the region .......................................................................... 5
2.1.1.3 The February 27th, 2010 Maule earthquake ................................................................. 6
2.1.2 Central America ............................................................................................................. 8
2.1.2.1 Seismotectonic frame ................................................................................................. 8
2.1.2.2 Significant earthquakes in the region ........................................................................ 10
2.1.2.3 Ground motion characteristics .................................................................................. 10
2.2 Development and effect of earthquake resistant regulations; Assessment of design
parameters ........................................................................................................................... 12
2.2.1 Chilean code ................................................................................................................ 12
2.2.1.1 Seismic zoning ........................................................................................................... 12
2.2.1.2 Further parameters for the design spectra ................................................................ 13
2.2.2 Guatemalan code ......................................................................................................... 17
2.2.2.1 Seismic zoning map ................................................................................................... 17
2.2.2.2 Further parameters for the design spectra ................................................................ 18
2.3 Consideration of tsunami hazard and subsequent events ................................................ 20
2.3.1 Tsunami effects in Talcahuano ..................................................................................... 21
2.3.2 Tsunami effects in Dichato ........................................................................................... 23
2.4 Conclusions, basic principles and strategies .................................................................... 25
3. Building stock survey and typology ................................................................................................ 26
3.1 Lessons from past and recent earthquakes; Damage cases and typical failure types ........ 26
3.1.1 Damaged buildings in Concepcin ................................................................................ 26
iii
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
iv
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
List of Figures
Figure 1. Pacific Ring of Fire ................................................................................................................ 1
Figure 2. Flow chart of the elaboration of the master thesis ................................................................ 3
Figure 3. Seismotectonic frame of South America ............................................................................... 4
Figure 4. Overview of South American subduction zone and several seismic events ............................ 5
Figure 5. Source model of the February 27th, 2010 Maule earthquake ................................................. 6
Figure 6. Source model and strong ground motion recordings of the February 27th, 2010 Maule
earthquake ......................................................................................................................................... 7
Figure 7. Attenuation of PGA and PGV for observed strong motions of the February 27 th, 2010 Maule
earthquake ......................................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 8. Tectonic map of Central America .......................................................................................... 9
Figure 9. Biggest earthquakes in Central America .............................................................................. 10
Figure 10. Hazard curve for Guatemala City in terms of PGA and SA (T) ............................................. 11
Figure 11. Uniform hazard spectra (UHS) for Guatemala City for return periods ................................ 11
Figure 12. Location of Concepcin (red circle) within the seismic zoning map of Chile ....................... 12
Figure 13. Design spectra for Concepcin for the different soil types ................................................ 16
Figure 14. Seismic zoning map for the Republic of Guatemala ........................................................... 17
Figure 15. Design spectra for Guatemala City for the different soil types ........................................... 19
Figure 16. Water level recordings for tide gauges along Chilean coastline ......................................... 20
Figure 17. Results of tsunami height measurments performed by Koshimura, S., et al., in 2010 ........ 21
Figure 18. Ground photos in Talcahuano taken by Koshimura, S., et al. in 2010 ................................. 22
Figure 19. Pre and post event satellite images of the most devastated area in Dichato. Points A to G
represent the position of ground photos in Figure 11 ........................................................................ 23
Figure 20. Ground photos in Dichato taken by Koshimura, S., et al. in 2010 ....................................... 24
Figure 21. Damage of Salas 1343 Apartment Complex....................................................................... 26
Figure 22. Libertad Tower ................................................................................................................. 27
Figure 23. Wall fracture of Libertad Tower ........................................................................................ 27
Figure 24. Failure mechanism in Libertad Tower ............................................................................... 28
Figure 25. Photos of Alto Ro building before and after the 2010 Maule Earthquake ......................... 28
Figure 26. Difference in wall volume and layout among basement, first floor, and second floor of Alto
Ro building ....................................................................................................................................... 29
Figure 27. Vulnerability classes listed in the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98) ........................ 30
Figure 28. Seismic Hazard Map of Chile ............................................................................................. 32
Figure 29. Map of Concepcin and the possible location for site measurements ............................... 33
Figure 30. Geotechnical map of Concepcin and Talcahuano ............................................................ 35
Figure 31. Geologic map of Concepcin downtown area (adapted from Vivallos et al, 2010). Red are
Paleozoic granitoids, green are Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks, dark brownish are Paleocene
sedimentary rocks, light brownish and yellow are Pliocene to Holocene sedimentary deposits that fill
the Concepcin basin ........................................................................................................................ 36
vi
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 32. Geological cross-section used as forward density model to fit the observed gravity anomaly
(points). ............................................................................................................................................ 36
Figure 33. Geological map of Guatemala ........................................................................................... 37
Figure 34. Geographical distribution of the different geotechnical units that cover Guatemala City .. 39
Figure 35. Damaged sections in downtown Concepcin; 6 out of 7 are parallel to major faults. ........ 40
Figure 36. Inspected buildings and damage level in downtown Concepcin, superimposed on geology
map of the region. Red box depicts the location of two adjacent buildings, one collapsed and one that
suffered minor damage. .................................................................................................................... 41
Figure 37. Locations of adjacent buildings designed using different site conditions in Concepcin .... 41
Figure 38. (a) Collapsed structure designed using Soil Type II conditions and (b) 20-story structure
adjacent to collapsed designed using Soil Type III conditions, and suffering only minor damage ....... 42
Figure 39. Image of the measured points in Concepcin, Chile .......................................................... 43
Figure 40. (a) View of the equipment. The velocity sensor was placed in a small hole ....................... 44
Figure 41. Microtremor or ambient noise measurement of a random test ........................................ 44
Figure 42. Illustration of the simple model assumed for the interpretation of microtremor H/V ratio as
defined by Nakamura (1989) ............................................................................................................. 45
Figure 43. Horizontal to vertical spectral ratio -HVSR- from Test 2 and Test 23 .................................. 46
Figure 44. Taxonomy of HVSR curves observed in Concepcin urban area ......................................... 47
Figure 45. Location of the measurements done by Leyton et al. for comparison. ............................... 48
Figure 46. Location of the measured points by Leyton et al., together with the measured points of this
study................................................................................................................................................. 48
Figure 47. Comparison between HVSR of (a) Test 3 and the Figure 44c (b) Test 15 and the Figure 44d
(c) Test 17 and the Figure 44d and (d) Test 18 and the Figure 44c ..................................................... 49
Figure 48. Final microzonation map for Concepcin, Chile................................................................. 52
Figure 49. Places where the measurements were taken in the building "Concepto Urbano" ............. 52
Figure 50. Location of the reinforced concrete buildings in Concepcin for further analysis .............. 53
Figure 51. Order of the ambient noise measurements....................................................................... 54
Figure 52. Location of the measured points in Concepto Urbano building ......................................... 55
Figure 53. Location of the measured points in Plaza Mayor III building .............................................. 55
Figure 54. Location of the measured points in Milenium II building ................................................... 56
Figure 55. Location of the measured points in Hotel Aurelio II building ............................................. 56
Figure 56. Calculated FFT spectra for Concepto Urbano building .................................................... 57
Figure 57. Location of the analyzed buildings in this study (green items) ........................................... 60
Figure 58. Final numerical models of the measured buildings............................................................ 63
Figure 59. Time histories of the station CCSP in the directions NS and EW plotted with MATLAB....... 64
Figure 60. Time histories of the station CCSP in the directions NS and EW inputted in ETABS ............ 64
Figure 61. Mode shapes of Concepto Urbano building ...................................................................... 66
Figure 62. Mode shapes of Plaza Mayor III building ........................................................................... 67
Figure 63. Mode shapes of Milenium II building ................................................................................ 68
Figure 64. Mode shapes of Hotel Aurelio II building .......................................................................... 69
Figure 65. Graphical comparison of the fundamental period of the buildings .................................... 70
Figure 66. Example of the definition of the pushover cases 1 and 2 ................................................... 71
Figure 67. Force-displacement relationship of a typical plastic hinge ................................................. 71
vii
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
List of Tables
Table 1. Values of the parameters that depends on the soil type ...................................................... 13
Table 2. Values of the effective acceleration A0 ................................................................................. 13
Table 3. Response modification factor R0 .......................................................................................... 14
Table 4. Values of the importance factor ........................................................................................ 14
Table 5. Nature of occupation for the importance factor ................................................................... 14
Table 6. Soil classification according the NCh 433.0f.1996, mod.2009 ............................................... 15
Table 7. Data used for the calculation and plotting of the design spectra for Concepcin .................. 16
Table 8. Values of the factors Scr and S1r ............................................................................................ 17
Table 9. Scale factors for design spectra for Guatemala .................................................................... 18
Table 10. Site Coefficient Fa .............................................................................................................. 18
Table 11. Site Coefficient Fv ............................................................................................................... 18
Table 12. Soil classification according to the AGIES NSE 2-10 ............................................................. 19
Table 13. Data used for the calculation and plotting of the design spectra for Guatemala City .......... 19
Table 14. Representative building types in Concepcin ..................................................................... 31
Table 15. Representative building types in Guatemala City................................................................ 31
Table 16. Classification of the geotechnical units in Guatemala City .................................................. 38
Table 17. Location and name of the measured points in Concepcin, Chile ....................................... 43
Table 18. Final results of the performed measurements .................................................................... 46
Table 19. Definition of the surface geology ....................................................................................... 47
viii
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
ix
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
1. Introduction
The countries located within the Pacific Ring of Fire are constantly in a high seismic hazard.
The Pacific Ring of Fire (shown in Figure 1) also called the Circum-Pacific belt or just The Ring of Fire,
is an area where a large number of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions occur in the basin of the
Pacific Ocean. An important fact about this region is that 90% of the world's earthquakes occur there.
The next most seismic region (5-6% of earthquakes) is the Alpide belt that extends from
Mediterranean region, eastward through Turkey, Iran, and northern India.
As is visible in Figure 1, most of the countries in Latin America are within this high seismic
area. The present study focuses in two regions, Central and South America. However these two
regions are wide and for this reason at the end were selected two representative cities in two
representative countries. The selected country in South America was Chile (located along the
southwestern coast of South America) and the selected city was Concepcin. The reason for selecting
Chile was the appropriate response of the infrastructure throughout the country during the February
27th, 2010 Maule earthquake and the selection of Concepcin was because it was the most
devastated city. All the lessons learned after the Maule earthquake are a good starting point for a
comparative earthquake-risk study. The selected country in Central America was Guatemala (located
at the southern tip of Mexico between the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean) and the selected city
was Guatemala City. The reason for this selection was because is the hometown of the author.
Make an engineering comparison can be very difficult, especially because it is important to
find comparable parameters.
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Historically in both Chile and Guatemala the earthquakes were produced mainly by
subduction (the first comparable parameter). More parameters for comparison will be discussed in
detail in the development of this document.
The first phase of the study was a careful investigation and a deep analysis of all the data
taken in a field trip throughout Chile, done just after the earthquake in the year 2010 by specialists
from the Earthquake Damage Analysis Center -EDAC- of the Bauhaus-University Weimar. The team
led by Dr.-Ing. Jochen Schwarz spent considerable time in several regions of Chile (including the
capital, Santiago de Chile and the most devastated city, Concepcin) analyzing the earthquake
damage. This starting point was important especially for the development of the first two chapters of
this document and also because all these information was the basic principles for the preparation of
the field research.
The chapter number two contents the hazard assessment and code situation analysis in both
countries. The most important particularities from source mechanism are described at the beginning.
Then a description of the development and effect of the earthquake resistant regulations (codes
and/or standards) were done and the assessment of the design parameters were also analyzed. It is
important to mention that one of the key factors of the good response of the infrastructure in Chile
during the earthquake was the good development of the Chilean design code. As a final part of the
first chapter, the consideration of tsunami hazard and subsequent events (including aftershocks)
were included.
The chapter number three contents the analysis of the building stock and the structural
typology in both countries. The lessons from past and recent earthquakes were analyzed and the
damage cases and typical failure types were described. A short reinterpretation of the building stock
at the time of some earthquakes was done based on the collection of data and elaboration of damage
statistics. An important part of this chapter was the identification of test site areas with typical
building representatives for the preparation of the field research. Also an identification of regional
variation of building types and their classification into vulnerability classes according to EMS-98
(European Macro Seismic Scale) was done.
The next phase of the study was a field research performed during May of 2012 in
Concepcin, Chile. After the identification of suitable measurement sites (taking into account
particularities of observed damage cases) and the collection of available profile data for test site
areas, ambient noise measurements were taken in several locations inside the urban area of
Concepcin using a velocity sensor. The analysis of the taken data was following the method of
Nakamura (1989, 2000) that popularized the use of the horizontal to vertical spectral ratio -HVSR-, as
an effective and economic tool to estimate the fundamental vibration period of the soil. The final aim
was to generate a microzonation map of Concepcin. Also using the velocity sensor, the building
response of representative building types was measured, in order to have reliable data for the
calibration of the numerical models. In the chapter number four all the procedures, calculations,
tables, graphs and maps are widely described.
The chapter number five of this document presents the interpretation of the case studies for
nonlinear analysis. It was performed a numerical modeling (using the software from CSI, ETABS) of
representative buildings for non-linear analysis, with the final aim of the elaboration of capacity
curves on the basis of pushover analysis and also a time history analysis was done. All of this led to
the assessment of the effectiveness of possible strengthening or retrofitting measures. Those
techniques are described in the last part of the chapter.
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
The Figure 2 shows the flow chart followed in the process of the elaboration of the present
master thesis.
Finally in the chapter number six they are described the strategies and basic principles of the
comparison and the further recommendations from one country to another. As a general idea, the
major purpose of the whole document and the study itself, was to analyze how the earthquake
damage can be mitigated based on the lessons learned in the past, and how to apply the right
parameters, situations and technical characteristics to the structural design, with the final aim that
the structures will preserve human life with the minimum physical damage and resisting a seismic
event of high magnitude.
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 3. Seismotectonic frame of South America (Rhea, S., Hayes, G., et al., 2010)
The convergence associated with this subduction process is responsible for the uplift of the
Andes Mountains, and for the active volcanic chain present along much of this deformation front. The
Nazca plate moves slightly north of eastwards at a rate varying from approximately 80 mm/year in
the south to approximately 70 mm/year in the north. Subduction zones such as the South America arc
are geologically complex and generate numerous earthquakes from a variety of tectonic processes
that cause deformation of the western edge of South America. Crustal deformation and subsequent
mountain building in the overriding South America plate generate shallow earthquakes. (Rhea, S.,
Hayes, G., et al., 2010)
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Slip along the dipping interface between the two plates generates frequent and often large
interpolate earthquakes between depths of approximately 10 to 60 km. Since 1900, numerous
magnitude 8 or greater earthquakes have occurred on the interface between the Nazca and South
America plates, including the 1960 Mw 9.5 earthquake in southern Chile, the largest instrumentally
recorded earthquake in the world and the 2010 Mw 8.8 earthquake. (Rhea, S., Hayes, G., et al., 2010)
Figure 4. Overview of South American subduction zone and several seismic events (Bilek, 2009)
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 5. Source model of the February 27th, 2010 Maule earthquake (Pulido, N., et al., 2010)
The source process is characterized by two asperities with a peak slip of more than 10 meters
and a rupture area of approximately 450 by 200 square kilometers. The first asperity is located at the
hypocenter and the second is located approximately 150 kilometers north-east of the hypocenter.
The ruptures propagated bilaterally starting slightly south of Constitucin and with an average
rupture velocity of 2.8 km/s. However the main moment release was located towards the North in
the Pichilemu region. The source moment function has total source duration of 150 seconds and
display two sub-events separated by 30 seconds (Shown in Figure 5). The average rake angle of this
earthquake was 93 degrees which approximately corresponds to the oblique convergence of the
Nazca plate beneath the South American plate. (Pulido, N., et al., 2010)
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 6. Source model and strong ground motion recordings of the February 27th, 2010 Maule earthquake
(Pulido, N., et al., 2010)
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Stations towards the central and southern regions of the source area such as Constitucin,
Concepcin and Angol did not displayed distinct sub-events, as the rupture propagation of the
northern asperity gradually ran away from southern stations. Angol station displayed the largest PGA
which indicated the possibility of large slip below the Arauco peninsula (around latitude -37.5
degrees). In fact the recent studies indicates that the Arauco peninsula experienced a maximum
coseismic uplift of 2.5 meters along the coast, suggesting that the source area could have reached a
latitude as far as -38 degrees, which approximately corresponds the northern end of the 1960
Valdivia earthquake. (Pulido, N., et al., 2010)
In the Figure 7 it is shown the PGA and PGV attenuation characteristics of observed strong
ground motions of the Maule earthquake, for the sites described. It is plotted the data together with
an empirical relationship of PGA and PGV for inter-plate subduction earthquakes (Mw 8.8, depth 35
km) for soil, stiff soil and rock site conditions. All observed data falls within one sigma (+/-0.3) around
the values for a stiff soil. This result implies that the observed peak ground motions characteristics
from the Maule earthquake can be satisfactorily explained by a typical empirical attenuation
relationship for inter-plate subduction earthquakes. (Pulido, N., et al., 2010)
Figure 7. Attenuation of PGA and PGV for observed strong motions of the February 27th, 2010 Maule earthquake
(Pulido, N., et al., 2010)
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
In Central America relative plate motions vary between 2 centimeters per year and 9
centimeters per year and are accompanied by active volcanism and shallow and intermediate
seismicity. Five main tectonic features have been distinguished in the region:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Many destructive earthquakes have occurred in the last 500 years, with high or moderate
magnitudes (8 Mw 6) associated with these five tectonic features. Many destructive earthquakes
in the region occur in the volcanic chain fault systems, having moderate magnitudes (M w 6:5), very
shallow foci, and epicenters close to the main population centers, such as the 1972 Managua Mw 6.2
earthquake, which caused more than 10,000 deaths in Managua, Nicaragua. But the most destructive
event in the last decades was the earthquake associated with the Motagua fault, Mw 7.6, causing
22,000 deaths in Guatemala City. (Benito, M.B., et al., 2012)
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Other earthquakes produced in the subduction zone with higher magnitudes, Mw > 7.5, have
caused less damage due to their larger focal depth and epicentral distance from the main population
centers, as the one in January 2001 in El Salvador. The last destructive earthquakes in the region
occurred in Costa Rica (8th January 2009) and Honduras (28th May 2009). The first, with magnitude Mw
6.2 and located in the central part of the country, was associated with a strike-slip fault of the
volcanic chain and caused hundreds of landslides and nearly 20 deaths. The epicenter of the second
one was located in the Caribbean Sea, with magnitude 7.7, and produced widespread damage in
Honduras, causing seven deaths. (Benito, M.B., et al., 2012)
10
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
The Figure 10 shows the hazard curve obtained for Guatemala City, for all the parameters
characteristic of the ground motion used in the study performed by Benito et al. in 2012: PGA and SA
(0.1 s), SA (0.2 s), SA (0.5 s), SA (1 s), and SA (2 s).
Figure 10. Hazard curve for Guatemala City in terms of PGA and SA (T)
for T = 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1 and 2 seconds (Benito, M.B., et al., 2012)
As expected, in all the cases the greatest values correspond to the spectral accelerations at
0.1 s and 0.2 s, and their corresponding hazard curves are almost coincident. The PGA curves are
similar to the SA (0.5 s) curves, and the SA (1 s) and SA (2 s) curves lie below.
The uniform hazard spectra for Guatemala City, for return periods of 500, 1000 and 2500
years are shown in Figure 11. These spectra are being used for checking the design spectra in the
respective Guatemalan code.
Figure 11. Uniform hazard spectra (UHS) for Guatemala City for return periods
of 500, 1000 and 2500 years (Benito, M.B., et al., 2012)
11
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 12. Location of Concepcin (red circle) within the seismic zoning map of Chile (NCh 433.0f.1996, mod.2009)
12
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
1 + 4.5
=
Where:
:
0 :
:
1 +
0
(2)
0.10 0 +
(3)
Where:
:
R0 :
Period of the mode with the mayor torsional mass in the equivalent
direction of the analysis
Response modification factor. Values are given in Table 3.
Importance factor that depends on the structure. Values are given in Table 4 and 5.
Table 1. Values of the parameters that depends on the soil type (NCh 433.0f.1996, mod.2009)
Soil Type*
S
T0 [sec]
T' [sec]
n
p
A
0.90
0.15
0.20
1.00
2.0
B
1.00
0.30
0.35
1.33
1.5
C
1.05
0.40
0.45
1.40
1.6
D
1.20
0.75
0.85
1.80
1.0
E
1.30
1.20
1.35
1.80
1.0
* The description of the soil types is given in Table 6
Table 2. Values of the effective acceleration A0 (NCh 433.0f.1996, mod.2009)
Seismic Zone
A0
1
0.20 g
2
0.30 g
3
0.40 g
Where g is the value of the gravity
13
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Structural System
Structural Material
Structural Steel
a) Ordinary Moment Frame (OMF)
b) Intermediate Moment Frame (IMF)
Frames
c) Special Moment Frame (SMF)
d) Special Truss Moment Frame (STMF)
Reinforced Concrete
Structural Steel
a) Ordinary Concentric Braced Frame (OCBF)
b) Special Concentric Braced Frame (SCBF)
c) Eccentric Braced Frame (EBF)
Reinforced Concrete
Walls and Bracing Systems
Wood
Confined Masonry
Reinforced Masonry
Concrete blocks
Clay blocks
Any other type of structure or material that cannot be classified in the
previous categories
4
5
7
6
7
5
6
11
10
11
3
5.5
6
7
5.5
4
5
8
10
11
7
4
4
3
2
4
3
-
Occupation Category
I
II
III
IV
0.6
1.0
1.2
1.2
Table 5. Nature of occupation for the importance factor (NCh 433.0f.1996, mod.2009)
Occupation Category
II
III
Nature of Occupation
Buildings and another isolated or provisional structures not destined for living,
not classified in the Occupation Category II, III and IV that represents a low risk
for human life in case of failure, including, but not exclusively:
- Agricultural facilities
- Certain temporary facilities
- Minor storage facilities
All the buildings and other structures destined to private living or public use
that are not classified in the Occupation Category I, III and IV, and buildings and
other structures that in case of failure represents a risk for other constructions
into the Occupation Category I, III and IV.
Buildings and other structures whose content is of great value, including but
not exclusively:
- Libraries
- Museums
Buildings and other structures where there is often a crowd of people, including
but not exclusively:
- Rooms for meetings for 100 or more people
- Stadiums and outdoor bleachers for 2000 or more people
- Schools, kindergartens and university campuses
- Prisons and detention places
- Commercial sites with an area greater than or equal to 500 m2 per floor, or
height greater than 12 m
14
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Table 5. (Continuation) Nature of occupation for the importance factor (NCh 433.0f.1996, mod.2009)
Occupation Category
Nature of Occupation
Shopping malls with covered aisles, with a total area greater than 3000 m2
regardless of the surface of the parking lots.
Buildings and other structures that are not classified in the Occupancy Category
IV including but not exclusively, facilities that manufacture, process,
manipulate, store, use or dispose of substances such as hazardous fuels,
hazardous chemicals, hazardous waste or explosives) containing dangerous
amounts of hazardous substances for the public if case of releasing.
Buildings and other structures containing hazardous substances should be
classified as structures Occupation Category II if it is demonstrated to the
Competent Authority by estimating the risk, according NCh3171, that the
release of the hazardous substance does not present a threat to the public.
Buildings and other structures classified as government buildings, municipal
utility or public utilities, including but not exclusively:
- Police stations
- Electrical or telecommunications stations
- Post and telegraph offices
- Radio and television stations
- Water and pumping plants
Buildings and other structures classified as essential facilities whose use is
especially important in case of disaster, including but not exclusively:
- Hospitals
- First aid places
- Fire stations
- Garages for emergency vehicles
- Terminal stations
- Emergency shelters
- Auxiliary structures (including, but not exclusively; communication towers,
fuel storage tanks, structures of electrical substations, support structures
for water tanks for fire or for home consumption or for other materials for
fire mitigation equipment) required for the operation of structures with
Category IV during an emergency.
- Aviation control towers, air traffic control centers and emergency aircraft
hangars.
-
III
IV
A
B
C
D
E
Soil Type
Rock, cemented soil
Soft or fractured rock,
very dense or very strong
soil
Dense or strong soil
Moderately dense or
moderately strong soil
Medium compactness or
medium consistence soil
VS30 [m/s]
900
RQD
50%
qu [MPa]
10 (qu 2%)
N1 [hits/ft]
500
50
350
40
180
30
0.05
< 180
20
< 0.05
Where:
VS30 :
RQD:
qu :
Su [MPa]
15
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
qu :
N1 :
Su :
In order to calculate and plot the design spectra for Concepcin it is used mainly the data
presented in Tables 1 to 6 and the rest of the parameters were assumed. The used data is shown in
Table 7 and the design spectra for the different type of soils are shown in Figure 13.
Table 7. Data used for the calculation and plotting of the design spectra for Concepcin
City of Concepcin
Seismic Zone: 3
A0
0.4 g
Material of the structure: RC Frame
R0
11
Importance factor: Occupation Category IV
1.2
Period of the structure
T* 0.4 sec
From Table 2
From Table 3
From Table 4 and 5
Assumed value
Figure 13. Design spectra for Concepcin for the different soil types
16
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 14. Seismic zoning map for the Republic of Guatemala (AGIES NSE 2-10)
Table 8. Values of the factors Scr and S1r (AGIES NSE 2-10)
Seismicity Index
2a
2b
3a
3b
4 (Yellow)
4 (Red)
4 (Magenta)
17
0.50 g
0.70 g
0.90 g
1.10 g
1.30 g
1.50 g
1.65 g
1
0.20 g
0.27 g
0.35 g
0.43 g
0.50 g
0.55 g
0.60 g
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
() = if
() = 1 if >
Where:
(4)
(5)
=
1 = 1
(6)
(7)
(8)
Ordinary Earthquake
Severe Earthquake
Extreme Earthquake
Minimum Earthquake
= 0.66
= 0.80
= 1.00
= 0.55
Site Class
AB
C
D
E
2a
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.7
Seismicity Index
2b
3a
3b
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.0
0.9
4
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
Site Class
AB
C
D
E
2a
1.0
1.7
2.0
3.2
Seismicity Index
2b
3a
3b
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.8
1.7
1.6
2.8
2.6
2.4
18
4
1.0
1.3
1.5
2.4
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
The criteria for the classification of the soils are shown in Table 12.
Table 12. Soil classification according to the AGIES NSE 2-10
Site Class
AB
Rock
Very dense soil or
soft rock
Rigid and stiff soil
Soft soil
Not applicable
Nnc
Not cohesive
sector
Not applicable
Suc
Not cohesive
sector
Not applicable
30
30
Vps
The whole profile
Np
The whole profile
750 m/s
750 to 360 m/s
In order to calculate and plot the design spectra for Guatemala City it is used mainly the data
presented in Tables 8 to 11 and the rest of the parameters were assumed. The used data is shown in
Table 13 and the design spectra for the different type of soils are shown in Figure 15.
Table 13. Data used for the calculation and plotting of the design spectra for Guatemala City
Guatemala City
Seismic Index: 4 (Red)
Scale Factor: Extreme Earthquake
Site Coefficients: Varies depending of type of soil
1.50 g
0.55 g
1.00
Varies
Varies
From Table 8
From Table 8
From Table 9
From Table 10
From Table 11
Figure 15. Design spectra for Guatemala City for the different soil types
19
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 16. Water level recordings for tide gauges along Chilean coastline (Hinrichs, R., Jones, L., et al., 2011)
In the Figure 16 the red dots in the center of the map shows the location of hydrographs. The
graphs on the left shows water levels over 18 hours after the earthquake (the red line is the time of
the earthquake). The graph on the right is on an expanded time scale to see the first 6 hours. Note
that sea level fluctuations occurred all day, not just immediately following the earthquake. The
tsunami hit as neap tide was approaching, which is when the lowestlow tides occur. Therefore, the
largest tides came in when high tide was approaching, 38 hours later in some places. (Hinrichs, R.,
Jones, L., et al., 2011)
20
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 17. Results of tsunami height measurments performed by Koshimura, S., et al., in 2010
21
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
The detailed description (Koshimura, S., et al., 2010) of the Figure 17 is the following:
a) Result of tsunami height measurement in Talcahuano. The red line indicates the extent of
inundation zone which was obtained by the interview with CATOE (Centro de
Alertamiento Temprano y Oficina de Emergencia)
b) Damage in Talcahuano found in the post-event satellite image using WorldView-2
c) Satellite image of Talcahuano before the tsunami attack taken the 13th of April 2009, from
Google
d) Close-up view of port of Talcahuano. Grounded fishing boats and drifted containers were
seen
It is possible to see in Figure 18 some pictures taken in situ that show the amount of
destruction and debris after the Tsunami in Talcahuano. Significant damages had also the ship
industry as it is visible in the Figure 18d (Koshimura, S., et al., 2010).
Figure 18. Ground photos in Talcahuano taken by Koshimura, S., et al. in 2010
The detailed description (Koshimura, S., et al., 2010) of the Figure 18 is the following:
A)
B)
C)
D)
22
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 19. Pre and post event satellite images of the most devastated area in Dichato. Points A to G represent the position
of ground photos in Figure 11 (Koshimura, S., et al., 2010)
In the area of Dichato, most of the houses were washed away and the tsunami left
considerable amount of debris. According to one eyewitness who watched the tsunami from 8-story
building, the first wave of tsunami hit at 5:00 hours in the morning after most of the people
evacuated. In addition the tsunami attack was at least 3 times and the 3rd wave was the largest.
(Koshimura, S., et al., 2010)
Another eyewitness said that the tsunami did not come first from the sea, but from the
backside with not so much power (first wave). Number of fatalities and missing people was reported
as 66 and the surviving resident believe that most of the victims were not from Dichato, but tourists
or people from different regions, heart attack elders and homeless people. This is mainly because the
residents of Dichato knew about the possible tsunami after the earthquake and had evacuation drills.
(Koshimura, S., et al., 2010)
23
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 20. Ground photos in Dichato taken by Koshimura, S., et al. in 2010
The detailed description (Koshimura, S., et al., 2010) of the Figure 20 is the following:
A)
B)
C)
D)
E)
F)
G)
24
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
25
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 21. Damage of Salas 1343 Apartment Complex (Saito, T., et al., 2011)
26
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
The machine room on the first basement was hardly damaged. The non-structural brick wall
collapsed more seriously on upper floors. (Saito, T., et al., 2011) The walls on the first and second
floors failed in flexural tension with the wall-end main reinforcement fractured or buckled. For a
better understanding the failure is shown in Figure 23.
Figure 23. Wall fracture of Libertad Tower (Saito, T., et al., 2011)
27
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
While the building was damaged particularly on the walls in the northeast and southwest
directions, little damage was observed on the walls in the orthogonal direction. Like it is visible in the
different illustrations in Figure 24, the damage concentrated on the wall footing is likely attributable
to the lack of flexural strength of the T section web resulting from the respective bending
deformation of two multi-story shear walls arranged in parallel due to the limited floor slab area in
the staircase. (Saito, T., et al., 2011)
Figure 24. Failure mechanism in Libertad Tower (Saito, T., et al., 2011)
Figure 25. Photos of Alto Ro building before and after the 2010 Maule Earthquake (Saito, T., et al., 2011)
28
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Conversely, little damage was observed on the underground end plane walls. As shown in the
plan view of Figure 26, the walls on the first floor and the basements (parking lot) are smaller than
those on the second and above floors in both length and volume. This fact may have resulted in the
damage particularly on the wall footing on the basements. (Saito, T., et al., 2011)
Figure 26. Difference in wall volume and layout among basement, first floor, and second floor of Alto Ro building
(Saito, T., et al., 2011)
29
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 27. Vulnerability classes listed in the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98)
For the EMS-98 the word vulnerability is used to express differences in the way that buildings
respond to earthquake shaking. If two groups of buildings are subjected to exactly the same
earthquake shaking, and one group performs better than the other, then it can be said that the
buildings that were less damaged had lower earthquake vulnerability than the ones that were more
damaged, or it can be stated that the buildings that were less damaged are more earthquake
resistant, and vice versa. This is not necessarily the same as other uses of the word vulnerability in
other contexts.
Also the EMS-98 uses the intensity like a classification of the severity of the ground shaking on
the basis of observed effects in a limited area. Intensity scales, and the concept of intensity itself,
have been evolving through the course of the last century. From a pure hierarchical classification of
effects it has been tried, more and more, to develop intensity as a rough instrument for measuring
the shaking.
30
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Material
Reinforced concrete
Clay brick masonry
Reinforced concrete block masonry
Wood
Adobe
Internit (panels made from cement, organic
reinforcements and natural aggregates)
Waste
Total
Percentage
32.0%
25.9%
2.0%
37.9%
0.2%
1.8%
0.2%
100.0%
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Material
Reinforced concrete
Clay brick masonry
Reinforced concrete block masonry
Wood
Adobe
Metal deck
Others
Total
31
Percentage
2.1%
3.7%
51.0%
13.2%
20.0%
4.2%
5.8%
100.0%
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
32
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 29. Map of Concepcin and the possible location for site measurements
33
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
34
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 30. Geotechnical map of Concepcin and Talcahuano (Valenzuela Oportus et al., 2007)
35
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 31. Geologic map of Concepcin downtown area (adapted from Vivallos et al, 2010). Red are Paleozoic granitoids,
green are Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks, dark brownish are Paleocene sedimentary rocks, light brownish and
yellow are Pliocene to Holocene sedimentary deposits that fill the Concepcin basin. (Assimaki et al., 2012)
Figure 32. Geological cross-section used as forward density model to fit the observed gravity anomaly (points).
(Assimaki et al., 2012)
36
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
37
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
These are unconsolidated Holocene alluvial sediments, including gravels, sands, silts and clays
derived from pyroclastic and lava, forming elongated layers of thicknesses up to 25 meters. The main
outcrops are presented in the delta of the Villalobos River in the Amatitln Lake, which represents the
largest accumulation of alluvial sediments; the urban center of Villa Canales, in the hamlet called El
Frutal. Also they are present in the riverbed of Las Vacas River, but as this is a younger riverbed and
with a lower flow rate, both their thickness and spatial distribution are smaller than the ones of the
Villalobos River. Due to recent deposition conditions of these lands, they have been assigned with the
classification E.
Formed by pyroclastic deposits due to flow or downfall; mainly pumice, ashes and sands.
These tephras form layers or continuous units of consistent thickness and that doesnt vary with the
topographic elevation. This deposits form layers of thickness between 0.5 and 10 meters, which vary
slightly between each unit. In general, these units are the main sedimentary cover of the Valley. In
fact, the pyroclastic filling presents thicknesses ranging between 5 and 250 meters. Regarding the
outcrops points, it is possible to say that in almost any point within the graben of the Valley of
Guatemala. Considering their general geotechnical consolidation, this unit has been assigned with the
classification C.
These are rocks of different composition and formation: andesitic lavas, basaltic, vitric and no
vitric welded tuffs. These rocks have been considerably affected by the developed tectonics (TertiaryQuaternary) which resulted in the fracturing seen in them. This unit outcrops in the eastern and
western margins of the graben of the Valley of Guatemala: Choacorral, Buena Vista, Labor de Castila;
high areas within the graben: Cerro El Naranjo and Cerro Gordo. These units are healthy consolidation
rocks, so the assigned classification is B. A similar range of consolidation, but from different geological
origin, which constitute the sedimentary Cretaceous rocks, present north of the graben, have been
identified as units type B'.
Table 16. Classification of the geotechnical units in Guatemala City (Flores Beltetn et al., 2001)
Profile
Type
B
B'
C
E
Description
Tertiary Volcanic Deposits. Rocks between normal and medium fractured, especially
in the east and west margin of the graben.
Cretaceous Sedimentary Rocks. Consolidation rocks very similar to the previous one
but of sedimentary origin. They are present on the north margin of the graben.
Quaternary Pumice Deposits. Pyroclastic deposits mainly formed by pumice, ashes
and sands. They are present in almost all the Valley.
Alluvial River Quaternary Deposits. Alluvial sediments of recent age, not
consolidated, including gravels, sands, silts and clays derived from pyroclastic
present in the zone.
38
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 34. Geographical distribution of the different geotechnical units that cover Guatemala City
(Flores Beltetn et al., 2001)
39
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 35. Damaged sections in downtown Concepcin; 6 out of 7 are parallel to major faults. (Assimaki et al., 2012)
The damage is primarily correlated with the location of old lagoons that were artificially filled
(non engineered) to increase usable surface on the city (Galli, 1967), similarly to the Texcoco lake in
Mexico on which Mexico city was subsequently founded; strong correlation was also noted between
the thickness of the sediments and the level of structural damage (Vivallos et al, 2010).
La Plvora Fault (see Figure 36) defines the NW edge of the south sub-basin where the
majority of the buildings are located; the rest of the damage in Concepcin was on the Tertiary
sediments between the La Plvora Fault on the north, the Chacabuco Fault to the south and the Lo
Pequn Fault to the east.
The fundamental periods for 46 surveyed buildings after the event were calculated by
Giuliano and Parodi (2011). The average period for the structures that suffered extreme damage is
0.68 seconds; for the severely damaged ones is 0.50 seconds; for the moderately damaged 0.38 sec;
and for the low to no damaged ones is 0.37. Hence, the softer soils on or near the artificial fills
combined with longer period structures contributed to the increase in structural performance
demand and the consequent severe structural damage.
40
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 36. Inspected buildings and damage level in downtown Concepcin, superimposed on geology map of the region.
Red box depicts the location of two adjacent buildings, one collapsed and one that suffered minor damage.
(Assimaki et al., 2012)
A striking example of the role of site conditions and soil-structure interaction in the seismic
performance of structures is described as follows. Two adjacent multi-story structures were inspected
during reconnaissance close to the Llacoln Bridge in downtown Concepcin (see location in Figure
37), one fully collapsed during the 2010 event and the other suffered minor damage and is currently
being repaired. The 15-story collapsed building (Alto Ro) was designed using Site Type II (before the
decree 61) on shallow foundation, and the one that did not collapse using Site Type III on pile
foundations, which implies a higher design spectrum. While there is no evidence that the soil
conditions are indeed different at the locations of the two structures (distance between them of
approximately 20 meters), the difference in design spectra values may have played an important role
in the failure of the building; according to the Chilean design code, the design spectral value for Type
III soil conditions relative to Type II is 2.78 for period T = 1 sec and 2.47 for period T = 2 sec. The
photographs of the two buildings are shown in Figure 38.
Figure 37. Locations of two adjacent buildings designed using different site conditions in Concepcin
(map and aerial view). (Assimaki et al., 2012)
41
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
(a)
(b)
Figure 38. (a) Collapsed structure designed using Soil Type II conditions and (b) 20-story structure adjacent to collapsed
designed using Soil Type III conditions, and suffering only minor damage (Assimaki et al., 2012)
Overall, damage in Concepcin was observed mainly on the valley, while the damage intensity
on the hillsides was lower. This suggests that topographic amplification was not a predominant cause
of damage at this location. While this does not imply that topography effects did not play a role in the
damage distribution, it does suggest that if they did, it was less relevant to seismic demand than the
stiffness of the subsurface sediments or basin effects.
42
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
43
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
(a)
(b)
Figure 40. (a) View of the equipment. The velocity sensor was placed in a small hole
(b) Final view of the installation of the equipment and data collection process
An example of the final result of the ambient noise measurement is shown in the Figure 41.
The software produces one time history for every minute that was measured.
44
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
(11)
Where HS and HB correspond to the Fourier amplitude spectra of the horizontal components
of the surface and substratum movement of the soil. However taking into account the contribution of
Rayleigh wave propagation for the ambient noise is necessary to convert the ratio HS/HB in order to
estimate a transfer function for microtremor measurements. Assuming that the vertical tremor is
not amplified by the surface layers (Figure 42) the ratio ER defined in equation 12 should represent
the effect of the Rayleigh wave on the vertical motion:
=
(12)
Figure 42. Illustration of the simple model assumed for the interpretation of microtremor H/V ratio as defined by
Nakamura (1989)
Assuming that the effect of the Rayleigh wave is equal for vertical and horizontal components
it is possible to define a corrected modified spectral ratio :
=
(13)
=1
(14)
Thus, an estimate of the transfer function is given by the spectral ratio between the
horizontal and the vertical components of the motion at the surface:
=
45
(15)
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
(16)
The Annex 2 provides the MATLAB code used for the calculations and in the Annex 3 it is
shown the horizontal to vertical spectral ratios for all the measurements. For the understanding of
the final numerical results shown in the Table 18, in the Figure 43 it is shown the horizontal to vertical
spectral ratios of the Test 2 and Test 23 as well as the selected values of the Amplitude and the
Frequency.
Figure 43. Horizontal to vertical spectral ratio -HVSR- from Test 2 and Test 23
Table 18. Final results of the performed measurements
Test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Frequency
[Hz]
1.00
0.62
1.03
2.75
0.60
7.00
0.60
1.01
1.08
0.46
1.04
0.50
0.62
Amplitude
Test
5
4.3
4.5
4.7
3.7
4.8
4.5
3.5
6.3
5.0
2.8
4.2
6.0
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
46
Frequency
[Hz]
0.36
0.43
0.68
0.80
0.50
0.97
0.40
1.01
1.03
0.55
1.03
0.69
1.06
Amplitude
5.5
5.7
4.0
5.0
4.8
6.7
6.6
8.0
4.5
8.0
3.3
4.2
6.5
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
To check if the frequencies obtained are somehow similar with the values calculated by
another authors, a comparison with the results from a similar study performed by Leyton et al. in
2011 is presented. After processing all the measurements Leyton et al. classified their results into 6
groups, as it is shown in Figure 44, having the following preliminary classification:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
A small amplitude peak (ranging from 3 and 5), with frequency between 1.5 and 2.5 Hz
A small amplitude peak, with frequency above 2.5 Hz
A small amplitude peak, with frequency below 1.0 Hz
A large amplitude peak (above 5), with frequency between 0.5 and 1.0 Hz
A large amplitude peak, with frequency between 1.0 and 1.5 Hz
A large amplitude peak, with frequency between 1.5 and 2.5 Hz
Figure 44. Taxonomy of HVSR curves observed in Concepcin urban area (see text for details). (Leyton et al., 2011)
The Figure 45 shows the location of the measured points by Leyton et al., and their respective
HVSR results. The figure is an aerial photograph showing additionally the surface geology (modified
from Galli, 1967) and their acronyms are explained in the Table 19. The stars in the map mark the
location of severely damage buildings after the February 27th 2010 Maule earthquake. Circles show
the location of the measurements, with the color proportional to the predominant frequency (see
legend) and the size to the HVSR amplitude.
Table 19. Definition of the surface geology (Leyton et al., 2011)
Acronym
Eocc
La
Pzg
Qtc
Qtfb
Ra
47
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 45. Location of the measurements done by Leyton et al. for comparison. (Leyton et al., 2011)
The Figure 46 shows the approximated location of the measured points by Leyton et al.,
(approximated because of the lack of the exact coordinates) together with the measured points of
the present study. The aim of placing the measured points together is to show in the map of
Concepcin which measurements can be compared. It is visible that only a few measurements were
done in the same place, or at least near to each other, making the comparison of some measured
points not possible. In the Table 20 is described which of the measurements can be compared and the
Figure 47 shows the comparison of the horizontal to vertical spectral ratios -HVSR-, taking into
account the HVSR curves of the Figure 44 by Leyton et al. and the results of the present study.
Figure 46. Location of the measured points by Leyton et al., together with the measured points of this study
48
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Test
3
15
17
18
(a)
Comments
Compared with Figure 44c
Compared with Figure 44d
Compared with Figure 44d
Compared with Figure 44c
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 47. Comparison between HVSR of (a) Test 3 and the Figure 44c (b) Test 15 and the Figure 44d (c) Test 17 and the
Figure 44d and (d) Test 18 and the Figure 44c
The final numerical comparison between the measurements taken in Concepcin and the
results presented by Leyton et al. in 2011 are presented in Table 21. The conclusion is that the
measurements and results of the present study are more or less similar to the results presented by
Leyton et al., in 2011. Only the result from the Test 3 differs considerably, because as it is visible in
description of the Figure 44c, the frequency should be below 1.0 Hz, and there is not a HVSR
presented in the results of Leyton et al., that includes the range from 1.0 Hz to 1.5 Hz to compare
with.
49
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Table 21. Final numerical comparison between the results of Leyton et al., 2001 and the present study
This study
Leyton et al., 2011
Condition of the comparison
Test
Frequency
Frequency
(See Figure 44)
Amplitude
Amplitude
[Hz]
[Hz]
A small amplitude peak (between 3 and 5),
3
1.03
4.5
0.85
4.5
with frequency below 1.0 Hz
A large amplitude peak (above 5), with
15
0.43
5.7
0.58
6.7
frequency between 0.5 and 1.0 Hz
A large amplitude peak (above 5), with
17
0.80
5.0
0.58
6.7
frequency between 0.5 and 1.0 Hz
A small amplitude peak (between 3 and 5),
18
0.50
4.8
0.85
4.5
with frequency below 1.0 Hz
(17)
b) Calculate the period ranges for classify the soils. For this purpose was used the data
shown in the Table 6.3 of the Chilean Code. It is important to mention that T0 and T are
described in the Chilean Code (as is written in the Chapter 2 of this document) just like
parameters that depends on the soil type. The Table 22 shows the calculation of the
period ranges and the Table 23 shows the description and the final values of the period
ranges for the classification of the soils.
Table 22. Calculation of the period ranges
Soil Type
T0
[sec]
T'
[sec]
A
B
C
D
E
0.15
0.30
0.40
0.75
1.20
0.20
0.35
0.45
0.85
1.35
0 +
2
[sec]
0.18
0.33
0.43
0.80
1.28
Table 23. Final ranges for the classification of the soils in function of the fundamental period
Soil Type
A
B
C
D
E
Description
Rock, cemented soil
Soft or fractured rock, very dense or very strong soil
Dense or strong soil
Moderately dense or moderately strong soil
Medium compactness or medium consistence soil
50
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
c) Classify the soils in function of their fundamental period. The final classification is shown
in the Table 24.
Table 24. Classification of the soils in function of the fundamental period
Test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Frequency [Hz]
1
0.62
1.03
2.75
0.6
7
0.6
1.01
1.08
0.46
1.04
0.5
0.62
Period [Sec]
1.00
1.61
0.97
0.36
1.67
0.14
1.67
0.99
0.93
2.17
0.96
2.00
1.61
Soil Type
E
E
E
C
E
A
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
Test
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Frequency [Hz]
0.36
0.43
0.68
0.8
0.5
0.97
0.4
1.01
1.03
0.55
1.03
0.69
1.06
Period [Sec]
2.78
2.33
1.47
1.25
2.00
1.03
2.50
0.99
0.97
1.82
0.97
1.45
0.94
Soil Type
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
It is visible that the majority of the points are classified in the range E (Medium compactness
or medium consistence soil). For this reason a sub-classification of the soil type E is proposed in this
study. The parameter of the proposed sub-classification will be period ranges of 25 minutes as it is
described in Table 25 and the final classification of the soils for the generation of the final
microzonation map is shown in Table 26.
Table 25. Sub-classification of the soil type E
Soil Type
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
Table 26. Final classification of the soils with the proposed sub-classification
Test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Period [Sec]
1.00
1.61
0.97
0.36
1.67
0.14
1.67
0.99
0.93
2.17
0.96
2.00
1.61
Soil Type
E1
E4
E1
C
E4
A
E4
E1
E1
E5
E1
E5
E4
Test
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Period [Sec]
2.78
2.33
1.47
1.25
2.00
1.03
2.50
0.99
0.97
1.82
0.97
1.45
0.94
Soil Type
E5
E5
E3
E2
E5
E1
E5
E1
E1
E5
E1
E3
E1
After all the procedure described in the previous paragraphs and tables, the final
microzonation map is shown in Figure 48.
51
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 48. Final microzonation map for Concepcin, Chile (Map generated using MapInfo Professional 10.5)
Figure 49. Places where the measurements were taken in the building "Concepto Urbano"
52
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
It is important to mention that selecting the reinforced concrete structures was one of the
most difficult tasks in the field research. One of the biggest issues was to obtain the structural
drawings. In addition to this fact, after obtaining the structural drawings, the other problem was to
get access into the buildings. At the end the Table 27 lists the buildings which will be analyze and the
Figure 50 shows the location of the buildings.
Table 27. List of the reinforced concrete buildings in Concepcin for further analysis
Building
Name
1
Concepto Urbano
2
Plaza Mayor III
3
Milenium II
4
Hotel Aurelio II
Storeys Basements
Address
23
2
Orompello 129
16
1
Manuel Rodrguez esq. Colo Colo
15
2
San Martn 553
10
1
Salas 135
Figure 50. Location of the reinforced concrete buildings in Concepcin for further analysis
After having the ambient noise measurements, the procedure for calculating the frequencies
of the structures will be different than the one followed on the site measurements, mainly because in
this case the horizontal to vertical spectral ratio -HVSR- will not be used.
There are some reasons for not using the -HVSR- and one of the most significant is that the
vertical component has no relation when calculating the fundamental period of a structure (The
Nakamura method is used for calculating frequencies in soils and not used in structures). Moreover
only the horizontal components of the measurements will be used (after the transformation of the
ambient noise measurements with the Fast Fourier Transform -FFT-) in the North-South (NS) and
East-West (EW) directions.
53
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
In addition to all the statements wrote before, another situation that needs to be analyzed is
the following; within the procedure to calculate experimentally the period of a structure using
sensors or accelerometers, a reference point should be taken. For example, when one structure has
been instrumented with triaxial accelerometers; one reference accelerometer (taken as a free-field
station) can be located in a place outside the structure. This last one will be used as a reference point
to have a parameter of comparison. The situation in this study is different because only one velocity
sensor was used to take the measurements with no reference point. For all these reasons in this
experimental study the measurements taken in the lowest basement will be used as the reference
point for the calculations.
It is important then to show the order in which the ambient noise measurements were taken.
As is visible in the Figure 51, the measurements were taken first in the highest storey, secondly in the
middle storey and finally in the lowest storey. The numbers of the tests also indicate the ascendant
order of the measurements.
Test 1
Highest
Storey
Test 2
Test 3
Middle
Storey
Test 4
Test 5
Lowest
Basement
Test 6
Trying to follow the procedure described before and showed in the Figure 51, it is very
important to mention that for making the measurements inside the buildings the following situations
(that can influence in the results) were found:
The four buildings are irregular. That means it was no possible to take the measurements in a
perfect imaginary vertical line like it is shown in the Figure 51.
In all the buildings exists inaccessible places within the storeys and the basements. This
situation made also not possible to respect again the scheme of Figure 51. This last situation
can be viewed in a better way in the Figures 52 to 55.
In the Figures 52 to 55 it is shown with red circles the specific location of the measurements
within the four buildings listed in Table 27.
54
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
55
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
56
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
As an example of the calculations of the frequencies it will be used the case of the Concepto
Urbano Building. For obtaining the fundamental period of the structure, the analysis of the
recordings were done in the following way:
a) Conversion of the collected data into ASCII format using a code in the cmd domain
b) Conversion into the frequency domain by using FFT algorithm using a MATLAB code
c) Calculation of the frequency values dividing the results of the FFT values (in both North-South
(NS) and East-West (EW) directions) of the tests 1 to 4 between the FFT values of the tests 5
and 6 using a MATLAB code
d) Calculation of the period of the structure using equation 17 of this document.
The Annex 4 provides the MATLAB code used for the calculations and in the Annex 5 it is
shown the spectra used for the calculation of the frequencies.
The Figure 56 shows some of the final FFT calculated spectra of the Concepto Urbano
building (choose randomly). As is visible in the spectra the first peaks of the amplitudes have a similar
behavior (In both North-South (NS) and East-West (EW) directions). This parameter will be used then
for selecting the frequencies.
57
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
It is difficult to assure that the highest peak in the spectra shown in Figure 56 will lead to a
reliable value of the frequency and then also to a reliable value of the period. Because of that fact,
the first two peaks were chosen to calculate the frequencies. In addition to have a comparison
parameter, the final fundamental vibration period of the structure will be calculated using the
following empirical equation extracted from the Table 12.8-2 of the ASCE/SEI 7-10:
= 0.0466 0.9
(18)
Where:
:
:
The Table 28 shows the calculated values of the fundamental vibration period for the selected
buildings, using the empirical equation.
Table 28. Calculated values of the fundamental vibration period using the empirical formula
Building
1
2
3
4
Name
Concepto Urbano
Plaza Mayor III
Milenium II
Hotel Aurelio II
Storeys
23
16
15
10
Height [m]
60.32
42.15
36.8
29.79
After calculating the 16 spectra for the Concepto Urbano building, the final results of the
selected frequencies and the calculation of the experimental fundamental vibration period are shown
in Table 29.
Table 29. Calculation of the period of the "Concepto Urbano" building
Direction
NS
EW
Operation
Selected
Frequencies
[Hz]
1 + 2
2
=
8
[Hz]
Periods [sec]
1.13
TNS = 0.88
[Hz]
Test 1/Test 5
0.70
1.00
0.85
Test 2/Test 5
0.72
1.01
0.87
Test 3/Test 5
0.70
1.60
1.15
Test 4/Test 5
0.71
1.30
1.01
Test 1/Test 6
0.96
1.70
1.33
Test 2/Test 6
0.91
1.70
1.31
Test 3/Test 6
0.80
1.80
1.30
Test 4/Test 6
0.88
1.60
1.24
Test 1/Test 5
0.72
1.10
0.91
Test 2/Test 5
0.73
1.00
0.87
Test 3/Test 5
0.52
1.00
0.76
Test 4/Test 5
0.60
1.00
0.80
Test 1/Test 6
0.76
1.00
0.88
Test 2/Test 6
0.70
1.00
0.85
Test 3/Test 6
0.60
1.00
0.80
Test 4/Test 6
0.58
1.10
0.84
58
+
2
Experimental
period [sec]
1.04
0.84
TEW =1.19
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
As it is visible in Table 29, the value of the calculated experimental fundamental vibration
period is considerably lower than the value calculated using the empirical equation. The same
procedure of the calculation of the experimental fundamental vibration period will be followed for
the measured buildings and the final results are shown in Table 30.
Table 30. Final comparison between the calculated empirical and experimental fundamental vibration period
Building
1
2
3
4
Name
Concepto Urbano
Plaza Mayor III
Milenium II
Hotel Aurelio II
As it is visible in the Table 30, the values of the empirical fundamental vibration periods are
higher that the experimental values. Because there are no precedents in calculating the fundamental
period with the experimental method performed, the highest fundamental vibration period will be
used (between the values of the empirical and experimental period) for the calibration of the
numerical models in the following chapter.
ID
Number of Storeys
Year built
Latitude
Longitude
AA-1
AH-2
CM-3
TL-4
PR-6
PP-7
RT-8
TO-9
20 +1 basement
15 + 2 basements
18 + 1 basement
17 + 1 basement
12
10
10
21 + 2 basements
2002
2009
2005
1973
2006
2004
2006
2008
S 364906.98
S 365012.45
S 364906.98
S 364942.70
S 364914.42
S 364746.81
S 364744.29
S 364945.97
W 730228.44
W 730606.97
W 730241.49
W 730310.62
W 730342.90
W 730505.77
W 730505.67
W 730318.45
Soil Type
(before the decree
61 of 2011)
II
III
II
III
III
III
III
III
The eight buildings use reinforced concrete bearing walls as the seismic-force-resisting
system. The number of storeys above grade ranges from 10 to 21. The classification of the soil types
were done with the tables of the Chilean Code The NCh 433.0f.1996, mod.2009 before the decree 61
of 2011.
59
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 57. Location of the analyzed buildings in this study (green items)
and the analyzed buildings by Westenenk, B., et al., 2012. (yellow items)
It is important to mention that in the paper presented by Westenenk, B., et al., 2012, it is
written that the periods showed in Table 32 can be considered as a lower bound of the true building
periods. In that study, the index period estimate T = ns/20 gives period estimate longer than the
fundamental period calculated by ETABS.
Table 32. Calculated fundamental periods by Westenenk, B., et al., 2012
ID
AA-1
AH-2
CM-3
TL-4
PR-6
PP-7
RT-8
TO-9
Tx [sec]
0.62
0.70
0.56
0.61
0.50
0.23
0.22
0.93
Ty [sec]
0.71
0.58
0.80
0.77
0.33
0.36
0.34
0.53
T [sec]
0.58
0.78
0.68
0.88
0.39
0.27
0.24
0.28
The calculated values of the fundamental period by Westenenk, B., et al., 2012 differs
considerable from the experimental values calculated for the four analyzed buildings in this study. In
addition that the numbers of storeys of the RC buildings are different, in the study performed by
Westenenk, B., et al., 2012 it was not performed an experimental method to calculate the periods
and only the results calculated by ETABS were presented.
60
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
61
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
The velocity sensor was placed in very stiff surfaces (in contrast from the measurements
taken in soils) like reinforced concrete slabs or finish floor system. The ambient noise in these
surfaces is different and the influence by other factors like human and machine activity within
the structure should be taken into account.
Related to the calculations:
The Nakamura method and the horizontal to vertical spectral ratio -HVSR- were not used to
calculate the natural frequencies. One of the most significant reasons is that the vertical
component has no relation when calculating the fundamental period of a structure (the
Nakamura method is used for calculating frequencies in soils and not used in structures).
Moreover only the horizontal components of the ambient noise measurements were used.
After calculating the Fast Fourier Transform -FFT- spectra for the measurements in both
horizontal components, the first two amplitude peaks were used to calculate the periods. The
highest peaks were not considered because in those amplitudes, the frequencies were too
high and hence the fundamental periods too low.
Conclusion 4.5.4:
Is not possible to sharply conclude that the method to calculate the fundamental period on the
basis of ambient noise measurements is not valid, because the number of measured buildings in
the present study was not significant and the measured structures were highly irregular.
Basic principle 7:
The obtained experimental data should be always compared, especially previous their usage for
scientific purposes such engineering calculations. Having a comparison parameter is always
necessary for experimental calculations.
Strategy 5:
In order to calculate the frequencies in one structure using ambient noise measurements, it is
necessary to analyze previously several important factors; especially the accessibility of the
structure to take the measurements and the strict monitoring of the primary defined scheme
procedure for taking the measurements.
62
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Concepto Urbano
Milenium III
Hotel Aurelio II
63
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
For the input of the seismic load to the numerical models and having the general idea to
generate an accurate simulation of the conditions of the February 27th, 2010 Maule earthquake, the
time histories of the station CCSP (-36.84425 Latitude, -73.10869 Longitude, located in San Pedro de
la Paz, approximately 7 kilometers away from Concepcin) in both directions NS and EW, will be used.
The reason to choose this recording station is because it presents the higher acceleration peak from
the availble time histories. Both time histories will be also modeled in ETABS and applied to all the
buildings. The Figure 59 shows the time histories plotted with MATLAB and the Figure 60 shows the
same time histories but already inputted in ETABS.
Figure 59. Time histories of the station CCSP in the directions NS and EW plotted with MATLAB
Figure 60. Time histories of the station CCSP in the directions NS and EW inputted in ETABS
64
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Additionally one especial situation presented during the numerical modeling of the selected
buildings is that in all of them the vertical elements are mainly shear walls. This property makes the
structure stiffer and in some cases while running the analysis of the structure, the periods were very
low. For the pushover analysis (and the definition of the plastic hinges) the structural elements should
be either columns or beams. For this reason in the four models, the shear walls were changed to
columns. This last action contributed also to have more realistic values of the fundamental periods
and using the assumptions listed before, the models were correctly calibrated.
The final calibration of the numerical models was performed with the values of the empirical
fundamental periods presented in Table 30. After running the analysis with all the applied loads, the
Figures 61 to 64 shows the first five mode shapes of the analyzed buildings and the Table 33 shows
the values of the periods of the buildings for the first five mode shapes.
Table 33. Results of the periods for the first five mode shapes of the buildings
1st Mode
1.8451
1.3260
1.1858
0.9687
Period [sec]
2nd Mode
1.6409
1.2571
0.9647
0.8851
65
3rd Mode
1.5106
1.0119
0.8756
0.8494
4th Mode
1.1317
0.2385
0.7183
0.8008
5th Mode
1.0857
0.2259
0.6491
0.5234
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
66
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
67
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
68
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
69
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
After the analysis of the data presented in Table 33, the values of the first mode shape will be
finally taken as the fundamental period of the buildings and the final comparison between the
empirical, experimental and calculated periods it is shown in Table 34.
Table 34. Final values of the calculated periods of the buildings
Building
Name
1
2
3
4
Concepto Urbano
Plaza Mayor III
Milenium II
Hotel Aurelio II
Empirical
Period [sec]
1.87
1.35
1.20
0.99
Experimental
Period [sec]
1.04
0.93
0.84
0.50
Calculated
Period [sec]
1.8451
1.3260
1.1858
0.9687
In the Figure 65 it is shown a graphical comparison between the empirical, experimental and
calculated period of the buildings.
Empirical period
Experimental period
Calculated period
70
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
For the analyzed buildings, the default nonlinear frame hinge properties were used. The
property of the major moment (M3) was used for beams and the property of coupled P-M2-M3
(PMM) was used for the columns. The assignment was done in a relative distance of 0 and 1 in each
element. It is important to mention that in ETABS the default hinge properties cannot be modified.
These properties also cannot be viewed because the default properties are section dependent. In
addition the default properties cannot be fully defined by the program until the section to which they
apply is identified. Thus, to see the effect of the default properties, the default property should be
assigned to a frame element, and then the resulting generated hinge property should be viewed.
The following step is to define the static nonlinear pushover cases. One important aspect
before defining those pushover cases is to select a control point for the lateral displacement after
pushing the structure. For the four different buildings different points were selected (will be
described for all the buildings). The first defined pushover case is for the gravity (using the dead and
live loads). Then it was defined two load cases using the modal load. (See Figure 66)
When the nonlinear analysis is done, it is important to analyze the formation of hinges
beyond the following control points (shown in the force-displacement curve, Figure 67):
71
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
After the whole analysis was done, several problems were found with the pushover analysis
in the two tallest buildings (Concepto Urbano and Plaza Mayor III building). Depleting the corrections
in the models and running the nonlinear analysis many times with different definition characteristics
of the pushover cases without success, at the end it was taken the decision of using the time history
analysis with the Concepto Urbano and Plaza Mayor III buildings, and the pushover analysis with the
Milenium II and Hotel Aurelo II buildings.
It is important to mention that the capacity curves approximate how structures behave after
exceeding their elastic limit.
72
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Transformation of the demand spectrum into displacement spectral acceleration vs. spectral
displacement using the expression:
= 2
(19)
Figure 70. Transformation to the Acceleration Displacement Response Spectrum format (ATC-40)
Construction of bilinear representation of capacity spectrum, estimating the damping for spectral
reduction.
Finally the intersection of the demand and capacity spectrum.
The final outcome of the performance point for the generated capacity curves, and as it was
established before using the Spectrum for Soil Type D, it is shown in Figures 71 and 72.
Figure 71. Performance point for the two pushover cases of Milienium II building
73
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 72. Performance point for the two pushover cases of Hotel Aurelio II building
Milenium II
Pushover case 1
Pushover case 2
Hotel Aurelio II
Pushover case 1
Pushover case 2
Pushover case 1
Pushover case 2
74
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
The generated control points for both pushover cases are shown in Tables 36 and 37.
Table 36. Control points for the pushover case 1 for Milenium II building
Pushover case 1
Step
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A-B
1923
1920
1912
1903
1900
1894
1893
1877
1791
1727
B-IO
3
6
14
23
26
32
33
49
135
166
IO-LS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
LS-CP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CP-C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C-D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D-E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
Step
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
A-B
1707
1702
1676
1671
1639
1633
1627
1622
1622
1926
B-IO
163
160
172
171
181
184
185
183
183
0
IO-LS
56
64
78
84
101
104
109
105
105
0
LS-CP
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
16
16
0
CP-C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C-D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D-E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
C-D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
D-E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
Table 37. Control points for the pushover case 2 for Milenium II building
Pushover case 2
Step
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A-B
1923
1845
1837
1832
1829
1826
1821
1813
1806
1798
B-IO
3
81
89
94
97
100
105
113
120
128
IO-LS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LS-CP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CP-C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C-D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D-E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
Step
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
A-B
1757
1754
1751
1745
1731
1673
1618
1560
1492
1492
B-IO
148
150
149
154
155
171
194
211
224
224
IO-LS
21
22
26
27
40
77
93
108
112
112
LS-CP
0
0
0
0
0
5
21
47
97
97
CP-C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
It is important to mention that the behavior of the performance point should be checked in
the range of the control points.
In the Figure 74 it is shown the formation of plastic hinges for the Hotel Aurelio II building.
Pushover case 1
Pushover case 2
75
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
The generated control points for both pushover cases are shown in Tables 38 and 39.
Table 38. Control points for the pushover case 1 for Hotel Aureilo II building
Pushover case 1
Step
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
A-B
617
547
505
505
505
504
501
501
497
497
497
497
464
463
618
B-IO
1
63
92
91
90
91
90
90
85
85
83
83
97
98
0
IO-LS
0
4
14
15
16
16
20
20
29
29
31
31
48
46
0
LS-CP
0
4
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
3
5
0
CP-C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C-D
0
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
D-E
0
0
0
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
5
5
0
>E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
TOTAL
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
Table 39. Control points for the pushover case 2 for Hotel Aureilo II building
Pushover case 2
Step
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
A-B
617
605
603
602
591
584
578
564
558
528
528
528
528
528
528
528
528
528
528
527
527
527
525
525
618
B-IO
1
13
15
16
27
34
36
47
50
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
70
70
70
58
58
0
IO-LS
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
7
10
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
28
28
0
LS-CP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
0
CP-C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C-D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D-E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
>E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
2
0
TOTAL
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
618
It is important to mention that for the two buildings, plastic hinges within the Collapse
Prevention appear in the 2 first storeys. Strengthening measures in beams and in beam-column
connections in those 2 storeys should be applied.
76
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
In the Figures 76 to 79 it is shown the time histories and the response spectra for the four
analyzed points and their respective displacement.
Figure 76. Time history analysis for Joint 9 of Concepto Urbano building
77
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 77. Time history analysis for Joint 14 of Concepto Urbano building
Figure 78. Time history analysis for Joint 21 of Concepto Urbano building
78
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 79. Time history analysis for Joint 46 of Concepto Urbano building
Figure 80. Analyzed joints for the Plaza Mayor III building
In the Figure 81 to 84 it is shown the time histories and the response spectra for the four
analyzed points and their respective deformations.
79
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 81. Time history analysis for Joint 2 of Plaza Mayor III building
Figure 82. Time history analysis for Joint 14 of Plaza Mayor III building
80
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 83. Time history analysis for Joint 17 of Plaza Mayor III building
Figure 84. Time history analysis for Joint 41 of Plaza Mayor III building
81
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
The colors of the response spectra shown in Figures 76 to 84 have the following damping
values assignment; magenta 0%, aqua 2%, red 3%, green 5% and yellow 10%.
The resume of the displacements in the directions X, Y and Z of the analyzed joints with the
time history analysis are shown in the Tables 40 and 41.
Table 40. Displacements in the analyzed joints for Concepto Urbano building
Joint 9
Joint 14
Joint 21
Joint 46
Displacement [cm]
X
Y
Z
2.039
1.243
0.810
2.425
1.244
0.837
2.038
8.130
1.268
2.424
8.121
0.661
Table 41. Displacements in the analyzed joints for Plaza Mayor III building
Joint 2
Joint 14
Joint 17
Joint 41
Displacement [cm]
X
Y
Z
2.144
1.519 0.0477
2.184
1.497 0.0555
2.184
1.472 0.0469
2.145
1.451 0.0349
From the time history analysis is important to state that is possible to have an insight view of
the displacements of the analyzed points within the structure. For the case of the analyzed buildings,
just the Concepto Urbano building will have high displacements in the horizontal directions Y for the
Joints 21 and 46. For the rest of the points within the analysis, the displacements are not very high.
82
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Figure 86. External steel configurations studied by Corazao et al. in 1986 (Engindeniz, M., et al., 2005)
Figure 87. Corrugated steel jacketing technique proposed by Ghobarah et al. in 1997. (a) before installation; (b) after
installation; and (c) cross section of corrugated steel plates (Engindeniz, M., et al., 2005)
It is important to mention that one of the most critical points in the analyzed buildings were
some beam-column joints in the first and second storeys. This situation makes the strengthening
technique in Figure 87 very important and applicable.
83
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
84
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
6. Summary
The seismotectonic characteristics are similar and comparable between South and Central
America. Earthquakes in those regions are mainly produced by subduction. The infrastructure in Chile
had an appropriate behavior and response at the moment of the February 27th, 2010 Maule
earthquake. (In housing buildings mostly and also because the building stock in places like Concepcin
showed that the majority of houses were constructed by wood). Nevertheless several buildings were
highly damage and one of them totally collapsed. If the analysis of the seismic characteristics of one
specific place is done in an accurate way, the code development will be also accurate and will lead to
a correct structural design. The appropriate development of the Chilean code and also the obligation
to use it for construction and structural design, led to the reduction of collapsed buildings. The
analyzed building stock showed that the building types in both regions are similar and highly
comparable.
One of the biggest conclusions is that if in both regions the seismotectonic characteristics and
the buildings types are similar, it is possible to perform a numerical recreation and modeling of the
action of an specific earthquake in a structural system in one place of the compared region, to
generate a structural damage prognosis that will lead to give recommendations for another place
within the same region.
Using the Nakamura method (after obtaining ambient noise measurements) for calculating
the frequency of the soils is a cheap and simplified method that produces acceptable results. The
calculated frequencies of the soils were satisfactory and a microzonation map of Concepcin was
proposed. Nevertheless the Nakamura method in this study was not accurate for measuring the
frequency of a structure. With the final aim to have calibration parameters, and after taking ambient
noise measurements in some buildings in Concepcin, the application of the same primary
parameters of the Nakamura method were done and it was showed that the calculated values of the
fundamental period of the buildings differs considerably from empirical and calculated values.
Performing the pushover analysis and the time history analysis was possible to predict the
possible damage in a certain points of the modeled buildings. Applying the recreated seismic loads of
the February 27th, 2010 Maule earthquake to the numerical models of the measured buildings were
possible to analyze the possible points of failure and give further recommendations for their
retrofitting and strengthening.
85
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Basic principle 2:
It is important for a country to define and establish a proper earthquake resistant regulation. In
many countries in Latinamerica like Guatemala, the United States building and seismic codes are
currently in use, mainly because their own regulations are still being develop. The usage of
building codes and regulations from other countries may incur in incorrect analysis and
miscalculations.
Basic principle 3:
The tsunami risk in Central America and especially in Guatemala is very low. Because of this, a
comparison between the tsunami damage is not dispensable in a Earthquake-Risk comparison
between the two regions.
Basic principle 4:
International documents like the European Macroseismic Scale EMS-98 can be used worldwide in
a seismic vulnerability classification because they were wrote by experts from different countries
and also their study cases.
Basic principle 5:
Even though the percentage of building types within two regions or cities are not close, it is
enough to have similar material and construction methods to run a comparison between them.
Basic principle 6:
For the performance of a microzonation study, the application of the Nakamura method is a
simple and dependable way to obtain the natural frequency of the soil. Nevertheless the
procedure to take the measurements should be in a correct and organized way to generate
reliable results.
Basic principle 7:
The obtained experimental data should be always compared, especially previous their usage for
scientific purposes such engineering calculations. Having a comparison parameter is always
necessary for experimental calculations.
Basic principle 8:
It is important to have parameters of comparison, especially when an experimental study is
performed. Either calculated, empirical or experimental parameters are indeed valuable for this
purpose.
6.2 Strategies
The proposed strategies (and also described in every chapter of this document) are the
following:
Strategy 1:
In order to have a correct and appropriate response of the infrastructure at the time of a seismic
event it is important to define and establish a proper earthquake resistant regulation. In addition
it is important to follow it strictly. The precise fulfillment of the regulation will lead to
minimization of the structural damage and of course the total failure of the structure.
86
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Strategy 2:
When is not possible to perform a building stock survey the best immediate source of information
are the population/housing census and surveys. Sometimes those studies doesnt present
accurate information related to the building stock, but they are a good starting point.
Strategy 3:
To proceed in a successful field research is necessary first to identify the precise test site areas
with typical building representatives to take measurements. Also after analyzing in the first place
the GSHAP map of a specific place, is necessary then to refine the area of analysis and search for
representative building types within the place and their neighboring places.
Strategy 4:
For obtaining reliable results while applying the Nakamura method, the ambient noise
measurements should be done on a free accessible point not affected by the vibration of tall
buildings and trees. In addition, to reduce the influence of the wind, the velocity sensor should be
installed in a small hole covered by a bucket.
Strategy 5:
In order to calculate the frequencies in one structure using ambient noise measurements, it is
necessary to analyze previously several important factors; especially the accessibility of the
structure to take the measurements and the strict monitoring of the primary defined scheme
procedure for taking the measurements.
Strategy 6:
While creating earthquake scenarios for structures, the pushover and time history analysis have
to be performed in order to generate a damage prognosis.
Strategy 7:
After the damage prognosis is done, the assessment of strengthening and/retrofitting techniques
for structural elements is indispensable in order to avoid structural damage and failure.
87
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
7. References
Abrahamczyk, L., et al. Seismic risk mapping of the city area of Antakya on the basis of ambient noise
measurement (H/V-spectra) and the specification of site-dependent amplification potential.
Internal Report prepared for project partner Mustafa Kemal University. Earthquake Damage
Analysis Center -EDAC-. Bauhaus-Universitt Weimar, Germany, 2009.
Abrahamczyk, L., Schwarz, J., Lobos, D. & Maiwald, H. Das Magnitude 8.8 Maule (Chile)-Erdbeben
vom 27.Februar 2010-Ingenieuranalyse der Erdbebenschden. Bautechnik 87 (2010) Heft 8.
AGIES NSE 2-10. Demandas estructurales, condiciones de sitio y niveles de proteccin. Normas de
seguridad estructural de edificaciones y obras de infraestructura para la Repblica de
Guatemala. Asociacin Guatemalteca de Ingeniera Estructural y Ssmica -AGIES-.
Alfaro, A., Navarro, M., Snchez, J., Pujades, L.G. Microzonifacion ssmica de Barcelona utilizando el
mtodo de Nakamura, ventajas y limitaciones. Memorias del primer Congreso de Ingeniera
Ssmica. Espaa 1999.
American Society of Civil Engineers. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,
ASCE/SEI 7-10. USA. 2010
Assimaki, D., et al. Site Effects and Damage Patterns. Earthquake Spectra, Earthquake Engineering
Research Institute Professional Journal. Volume 28, No. S1. Pages pp. S55-S74. June 2012.
Astroza, M., et al. Intensidades ssmicas en el rea de daos del terremoto del 27 de febrero de
2010. Internal Report Departamento de Ingeniera Civil. Facultad de Ciencias Fsicas y
Matemticas . Universidad de Chile. 2010
ATC-40, Applied Technology Council. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. California
Seismic Safety Comission. Proposition 122 Seismic Retrofit Practices Improvement Program.
Report SSC 96-01. USA 1996.
Benito, M. B., Lindholm, C., Camacho, E., et al. A New Evaluation of Seismic Hazard for the Central
America Region. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 504
523, April 2012.
Bilek, S.L. Seismicity along the South American subduction zone: Review of large earthquakes,
tsunamis,
and
subduction
zone
complexity.
Tectonophysics.
200.,
doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2009.02.037. TECTO-124532; No of Pages 13
Computers and Structures, Inc. -CSI- 2012. ETABS Version 9.7, Computers and Structures, Inc.,
Berkeley, CA.
Diario oficial de la Repblica de Chile. Decreto 61, 2011. Decree for the implementation of new
design parameters in the code; NCh 433.0f.1996, mod.2009. Diseo ssmico de edificios.
December 2011.
88
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Hinrichs, R., et al. Report on the 2010 Chilean Earthquake and Tsunami Response. U.S. Department
of the Interior & U.S. Geological Survey. Open-File Report 2011-1053, version 1.1. 2011
Instituto Nacional de Estadsticas de Chile (INE). Censo 2002. Further information extracted directly
from: http://www.ine.cl/cd2002/index.php
Instituto Nacional de Estadstica de Guatemala (INE) Encuesta Nacional de Condiciones de Vida
-ENCOVI
2006-,
Further
information
extracted
directly
from:
http://www.ine.gob.gt/np/encovi/encovi2006.htm
Kokar, M. and Akgn, H. Evaluation of site characterizations and site effects of the Ankara basin,
Turkey Paper No. 1241, 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical
Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece. June, 2007
Koshimura, S., et al. Field survey of the 2010 tsunami in Chile. 2010 Chile Earthquake and Tsunami
Technical Report. JST-JICA SATREPS Per Project. Chile Earthquake Field Investigation Team.
December 2010.
Lacave, C. et al. Microzonation: techniques and examples. Rsonance Ingnieurs-Conseils SA,
Geneva, Switzerland
Leyton, F., Montalva, G. and Ramrez, P. Towards a Seismic Microzonation of Concepcin Urban area
based on Microtremors, Surface Geology, and Damage observed after the Maule 2010
earthquake. First Results. 4th IASPEI/IAEE International Symposium: Effects of Surface
Geology on Seismic Motion. University of California Santa Barbara, USA. August 2326, 2011.
Maiwald, H., Schwarz, J., Abrahamczyk, L., & Lobos. Das Magnitude 8.8 Maule (Chile)-Erdbeben vom
27.Februar 2010-Ingenieuranalyse der Tsunamischden, Teil 2. Bautechnik 87 (2010) Heft 10.
89
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Murat Engindeniz, M., Kahn, L., and Zureick, A. Repair and Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete
Beam-Column Joints: State of the Art. ACI Structural Journal, V. 102, No. 2, March-April 2005.
Nakamura, Y. A method for dynamic characteristics estimations of subsurface using microtremors on
the ground surface, Q. Rep. Railway Tech. Res. Inst. Japan, 1989.
Nakamura, Y. Real-time information systems for hazard mitigation, Proc. 11th Conf. on Earthquake
Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, 1996.
Nakamura, Y. Clear identification of Nakamura's technique and its application, Proc. 12th World
Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 2000.
NCh 433.0f.1996, mod.2009. Diseo ssmico de edificios. Norma Chilena Oficial. Instituto Nacional
de Normalizacin. INN- Chile.
Ojeda, A. Evaluacin de efectos de sitio para la microzonificacin ssmica de Pereira. Internal Report
Instituto de Investigaciones en Geociencias, Minera y Qumica INGEOMINAS.
Parvez, I. Seismic Microzonation: Methodology and Approach Research Report CM 0310. CSIR
Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Computer Simulation. Bangalore, India. November
2003
Pinilla Ramos, C. Correlacin entre el perfil de velocidad de propagacin de ondas de corte y el
espectro de respuesta en suelos. Tesis de grado. Universidad de Chile. January 2012.
Pulido, N., et al. Earthquake Source Process and Site effects of Strong Motion stations of the 2010
Chile Mega-Earthquake. 2010 Chile Earthquake and Tsunami Technical Report. JST-JICA
SATREPS Per Project. Chile Earthquake Field Investigation Team. December 2010.
Rhea, S., Hayes, G., et al. Seismicity of the earth 19002007, Nazca Plate and South America U.S.
Geological Survey. Open-File Report 2010 1083-E, 1 sheet, scale 1:12,000,000.
Rodriguez Segurado, M. Caracterizacion de la Respuesta Sismica de los Suelos. Aplicacin a la ciudad
de Barcelona. Bachelor Thesis. Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya. 2005
Saito, T., et al. Building Damage Investigation of the 2010 Chile Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster.
2010 Chile Earthquake and Tsunami Technical Report. JST-JICA SATREPS Per Project. Chile
Earthquake Field Investigation Team. December 2010.
Schwarz, J. & Schmidt, H.-G. Ingenieuranalyse von Erdbebenschden: Lehren aus aktuellen
Ereignissen. Bautechnik 74 (1997) 12. 826-846
Turnbull, M. Relative seismic shaking vulnerability microzonation using an adaptation of the
Nakamura horizontal to vertical spectral ratio method. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 117, S2, November
2008, pp. 879895
Valenzuela Oportus, M., et al. Clasificacin Ssmica del Subsuelo de la Zona Concepcin-Talcahuano,
Aplicacin NCh 433. VI Congreso Chileno de Geotecnia. Chile 2007.
90
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Vzquez Rosas, R., et al. Propuesta de Microzonificacin ssmica de la Ciudad de Zamora Michoacn.
Sociedad Mexicana de Ingeniera Ssmica, A. C. Articulo III-02. XV Congreso Nacional de
Ingeniera Ssmica, Mxico D.F, Septiembre 2005
Velsquez Jofre, D. Project Rainbow I, Guatemala. Internal project within the NHRE Master Program
in Bauhaus-University Weimar for the course; Geographical Information Systems and Building
Stock Survey. Germany 2011.
Verdugo, R. Dinmica de suelos amplificacin ssmica. Lecture notes. Departamento de Ingeniera
Civil. Universidad de Chile.
Westenenk, B., et al. Response of Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Concepcin during the Maule
Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Professional
Journal. Volume 28, No. S1. Pages S257S280. June 2012.
Zaslavsky, Y., et al. Seismic Hazard maps in terms of spectral acceleration at periods of 0.2 sec and 1
sec for the design response spectrum (two-point method) in the new version of the Israel
Building Code (SI413) . Report No. 522/474/09, prepared for The National Steering
Committee for Earthquake Preparedness. November, 2009
Electronic References:
[1] http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/fire.html
(Consulted in August 2012)
[2] http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/chile/gshap.php
(Consulted in September 2012)
[3] http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=785038
(Consulted in August 2012)
[4]http://www.guateganga.com/ciudad_de_guatemala/apartamentos/PRECIOSAS_CASAS_DE_LADRILLO_EN_Z
ONA_18_CUOTA__1293.htm
(Consulted in August 2012)
[5] http://www.vivastreet.cl/compra-casas+concepcion/vendo-casa-lomas-san-andres/54009986
(Consulted in August 2012)
[6]http://guatemala.mundoanuncio.com.gt/casa-grande-en-el-manantial-de-san-rafael-zona-18-guatemala-iid250674694
(Consulted in August 2012)
[7] http://concepcion.avisos-chile.com/item/8209/
(Consulted in August 2012)
[8] http://ciudaddeguatemala.mundoanuncio.com.gt/casas-de-madera-en-guatemala-iid-406209555
(Consulted in August 2012)
[9] http://laprimerapopular.blogspot.de/2010/03/el-terremoto-en-comunas-rurales-de-la.html
(Consulted in August 2012)
[10] http://www.world-housing.net/WHEReports/wh100162.pdf
(Consulted in August 2012)
91
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
8. Annexes
Annex 1. Comparison of the building types between Concepcin and Guatemala
City and assignation of vulnerability classes
Annex 1a. Reinforced Concrete
Type of structure (according the EMS-98)
Vulnerability Class
C
D
Concepcin
Guatemala City
Description and comments
General Description: With a high percentage of General Description: Although the percentage of
usage, this type of building is widely used in usage is not high in comparison with other
Concepcin for residential and also for building types, in Guatemala City their majority
commercial purposes. The percentage of the are for commercial purposes. The use of this kind
usage in comparison with the other building of building types for residential purposes is
types is high.
representative but also not high.
Foundations: Generally isolated reinforced Foundations: Generally isolated reinforced
concrete foundations. Depending on the soil type concrete foundations. Depending on the soil type
can be used also foundation piles.
can be used also foundation piles.
Walls: Shear walls where required. Masonry Walls: Shear walls where required. Masonry
elements for infills.
elements for infills.
Roof: Generally reinforced concrete slabs.
Roof: Generally reinforced concrete slabs.
Code Specification: NCh30 (ACI 318 S-08)
Code Specification: ACI 318 S-08
92
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Vulnerability Class
C
D
Concepcin
[4]
Guatemala City
93
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Vulnerability Class
C
D
Concepcin
Guatemala City
94
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Vulnerability Class
C
D
[7]
Concepcin
[8]
Guatemala City
Description and comments
General Description: The most used building type General Description: The percentage of use of
in Concepcin. The reasons to be widely used are this building type is not representative. Although
the high wood production of the Bo-Bo region, Guatemala as a country produces several types
the precise development of the code (related to of wood, the construction of this building type is
the design of wood structures) and finally the expensive and the maintenance costs are high
relative low weight of the structure (very good due to decay, insects and fungi attacks. This
seismic behavior). The building type is used building type is used for residential purposes.
mostly for residential purposes and typically has The high income class constructs two storey
one or two storeys.
luxury houses and the low income class
Foundations: Continuous or strip reinforced constructs one storey informal houses.
concrete foundations.
Foundations: Continuous or strip reinforced
Walls: Wood walls or infills connected with nails. concrete foundations.
Also the material of the internal walls is Walls: Wood walls or infills connected with nails.
prefabricated recycled panels connected also Also the material of the internal walls is
with nails.
prefabricated recycled panels connected also
Roof: Wood structure connected with nails.
with nails.
Code Specification: NCh1198.Of1991
Roof: Wood structure connected with nails.
NCh1970/1.Of1988
Code Specification: NSE 7.7 and Especificaciones
NCh1970/2.Of1988
de la DG de Obras Pblicas de Guatemala, 1976
NCh1990.Of1986
NCh2148.Of1989
NCh2151.Of1989
NCh2165.Of1991
95
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Vulnerability Class
C
D
[9]
Concepcin
[10]
Guatemala City
96
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
end
97
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
98
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Annex 3. Horizontal to vertical spectral ratios -HVSR- from the 26 measured sites
in Concepcin, Chile
99
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
100
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
101
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
102
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
103
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Annex 4. MATLAB code to calculate the FFT spectra for the calculation of the
fundamental period of the selected buildings in Concepcin, Chile
(Elaborated by EDAC, 2012)
clear all
name = 'R01_';
folder1 ='prueba test 1\FFT';
folder2 ='prueba test 5\FFT';
filename1=(['./espec1/MP1_MP5_EW.png']);
dd0=dir(['.\' folder1 '\*.ew.fft.mat']); % Number of files
dd1=dir(['.\' folder2 '\*.ew.fft.mat']); % Number of files
b=length(dd0);
for n=1:b-1
fn1 = dd0(n).name;
X1 =load(['./' folder1 '\' fn1]);
data1=X1.save_ew(:,1);
data1=data1(1:4096,1);
fn2 = dd1(n).name;
X2=load(['./' folder2 '\' fn2]);
data2=X2.save_ew(:,1);
data2=data2(1:4096,1);
l=length(data2)*2;
f=((1:l/2)/l*100)';
f2=f(1:4096);
res(:,1)= f2;
res(:,n+1)= data1 ./ data2;
save_es=res;
save(['./espec1/' name 'MP01_fft_(ew)_div_MP05_fft(ew)_' dd0(n).name(6:8) '.txt'],
'save_es', '-ascii');
figure(1)
set(gca,'fontsize',12);
loglog(f,res(:,n+1))
axis([.1 20 .01 10])
hold on
title('TEST 1 / TEST 5 (EW)', 'fontsize',16, 'fontweight','b');
xlabel('Frequency [Hz]', 'fontsize',14);
ylabel('Amplitude', 'fontsize',14);
end
104
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Annex 5. FFT spectra for the calculation of the fundamental period of the selected
buildings in Concepcin, Chile
Building 1: Concepto Urbano
105
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
106
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
107
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
108
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
109
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Building 3: Milenium II
110
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
111
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
112
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
113
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
114
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
115
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
116
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
Plan view
storey 1
Plan view
storey 2
Plan view
storeys 3 to 9
Plan view
storey 10
117
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
Plan view
storey 11
Plan view
storeys 12
to 21
Plan view
storeys 22
and 23
Elevation axis
1 and 2
118
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
Elevation
axis 3, 4
8A and 12
10
Elevation
axis 5
11
Elevation
axis 6
12
Elevation
axis 7, 9
5A and B1
119
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
13
Elevation
axis 10
14
Elevation
axis 11
15
Elevation
axis 13
16
Elevation axis
14, 0-0
and A-A
120
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
17
Elevation axis
B and C1
18
Elevation
axis C
19
Elevation axis
D, I, J
and M
20
Elevation axis
E, and F-F
121
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
21
Elevation axis
G, K1, B
and G1
22
Elevation axis
H and C2
23
Elevation axis
K
24
122
Elevation
axis L
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
25
Concepto Urbano
25.dwg
Elevation axis
N-0, 4A, 4
4B and J2
26
Concepto Urbano
26.dwg
Plan view
basement 1
27
Concepto Urbano
27.dwg
Plan view
basement 2
28
Concepto Urbano
28.dwg
Stairs and
details
123
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
124
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
Plan view
storey 1
Plan view
storey 2
Plan view
storeys 3 to 13
Plan view
storey 14
125
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
Plan view
storeys 15
and 16
Elevation axis
1, 2,
22 and 23
Elevation axis 4
and E
Elevation axis 5
8 and 16
126
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
Elevation axis 6
and 18
10
Elevation axis
9, 15, B1
C1 and H1
11
Elevation
axis 12
and 17
12
Elevation
axis 5
8 and 16
127
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
13
Elevation axis
10, G
and L1
14
15
Elevation
axis 19
and 20
16
Elevation
axis A
and B
128
Elevation
axis 18
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
17
Elevation
axis C
18
Elevation
axis D
19
Elevation axis
E, G, X
Y and Z
20
Elevation
axis I
129
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
21
Elevation axis
F and J
22
Elevation axis
K and M
23
Plan view
basement
24
Stairs and
details
130
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Milenium II Building:
131
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
Milenium 1.dwg
Plan view
storey 1
Milenium 2.dwg
Plan view
storey 2
Milenium 3.dwg
Plan view
storey 3
Milenium 4.dwg
Plan view
storeys 4 to 6
132
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
Milenium 5.dwg
Plan view
storeys 7 to 11
Milenium 6.dwg
Plan view
storeys 12
and 13
Milenium 7.dwg
Plan view
storeys 15
and 16
Milenium 8.dwg
Elevation
axis 1
133
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
Milenium 9.dwg
Elevation
axis 2
10
Milenium 10.dwg
Elevation
axis 3
11
Milenium 11.dwg
Elevation
axis 4
12
Milenium 12.dwg
Elevation
axis 1
134
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
13
Milenium 13.dwg
Elevation
axis 6
14
Milenium 14.dwg
Elevation
axis 7, 9, 5a
5b and 5c
15
Milenium 15.dwg
Elevation
axis A
16
Milenium 16.dwg
Elevation
axis B and D
135
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
17
Milenium 17.dwg
Elevation
axis C
18
Milenium 18.dwg
Elevation
axis E
19
Milenium 19.dwg
Elevation
axis F
20
Milenium 20.dwg
Elevation
axis G
136
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
21
Milenium 21.dwg
Plan view
basement 1
22
Milenium 22.dwg
Plan view
basement 2
23
Milenium 23.dwg
Stairs and
details
137
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
E M
NG
IE
LT
P AR
A
S C ON S U
DO
RO
O
RE
L T DA .
138
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
Plan view
basement 1
and storey 1
Plan view
storeys 2
and 3
Plan view
storeys 4, 5
and 5
Plan view
storeys 7, 8
and 9
139
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
Elevation
axis 1, 2
3 and I
Elevation
axis 3a
and 4
Elevation
axis 5
and 5a
Elevation
axis 6
140
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
Content
Elevation
axis 8
10
Elevation
axis A, B
C and D
11
Elevation
axis E
and F
12
Elevation
axis G
and H
141
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
No.
Sketch
13
142
Content
Stairs and
details
th
Strategies and basic principles for comparative Earthquake-Risk Studies between Central and South America, taking the February 27 , 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake as reference event
Statement
Herewith I declare that I wrote this master thesis myself and I did not use
any other references than those mentioned in this document.
143