0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
127 просмотров2 страницы
Victoriano, a member of the Iglesia ni Cristo, resigned from the union representing workers at his workplace after the passage of RA 3350. This law stated that collective bargaining agreements could not require membership in a union for members of religious sects that prohibit affiliation. When Victoriano reiterated his resignation 12 years later, the union requested his dismissal. The Court ruled that RA 3350 was intended to protect religious freedom and prevent discrimination against those whose religions prohibit union membership. Contractual rights must yield to freedom of religion, which is a fundamental right. As long as the state pursues secular goals in a generally applicable way without targeting religion, indirect burdens are permissible.
Victoriano, a member of the Iglesia ni Cristo, resigned from the union representing workers at his workplace after the passage of RA 3350. This law stated that collective bargaining agreements could not require membership in a union for members of religious sects that prohibit affiliation. When Victoriano reiterated his resignation 12 years later, the union requested his dismissal. The Court ruled that RA 3350 was intended to protect religious freedom and prevent discrimination against those whose religions prohibit union membership. Contractual rights must yield to freedom of religion, which is a fundamental right. As long as the state pursues secular goals in a generally applicable way without targeting religion, indirect burdens are permissible.
Victoriano, a member of the Iglesia ni Cristo, resigned from the union representing workers at his workplace after the passage of RA 3350. This law stated that collective bargaining agreements could not require membership in a union for members of religious sects that prohibit affiliation. When Victoriano reiterated his resignation 12 years later, the union requested his dismissal. The Court ruled that RA 3350 was intended to protect religious freedom and prevent discrimination against those whose religions prohibit union membership. Contractual rights must yield to freedom of religion, which is a fundamental right. As long as the state pursues secular goals in a generally applicable way without targeting religion, indirect burdens are permissible.
Victoriano tendered his resignation for being a member of Iglesia ni Cristo, after the enactment of RA 3350 which directed that the agreement between employer and labor organization is not binding to members of religious sects which prohibit affiliation of their members to any such organization. In order to remain with the Company, according to the Collective Bargaining Agreement, the employee should likewise be a member of the Union. Facts: 1. Benjamin Victoriano was a member of the Iglesia ni Cristo and was employed by Elizalde Rope Factory, Inc. since 1958. He was a member of the Workers Union, whose collective bargaining agreement with the company provided that [m]embership in the Union shall be required as a condition of employment for all permanent employees. 2. Republic Act 3350 was enacted on June 18, 1961. It introduced amendment to Section 4[4(a)] of RA 875. Said section of RA 875 did not preclude the employer from making an agreement with a labor organization to require as a condition of employment membership therein, if such labor organization is the representative of the employees. However, due to the amendment introduced by RA 3350, such agreement (between employer and labor organization) shall not cover members of any religious sect which prohibit affiliation of their members in any such labor organization. 3. Being a member of a religious sect which prohibits affiliation of its members with any labor organization, Victoriano tendered his resignation to the Union in 1962. However, no action was taken by the Union; thus, petitioner reiterated his resignation 12 years later. The Union, on the other end, wrote a formal letter to the Company asking for the separation of Victoriano from service as he was resigning from the Union as a member. 4. The management in turn notified Victoriano and his counsel that unless they (Victoriano) could achieve a satisfactory arrangement with the Union, the Company would be constrained to dismiss him from service. Ruling: 1. The purpose of RA 3350 was to insure freedom of belief and religion, and to promote the general welfare by preventing discrimination against those members of religious sects which prohibit their members from joining labor unions, confirming thereby their natural, statutory and constitutional right to work, the fruits of which work are usually the only means whereby they can maintain their own life and the life of their dependents. 2. Religious freedom, although not unlimited, is a fundamental personal right and liberty and has a preferred position in the hierarchy of values. Contractual rights, therefore, must yield to freedom of religion. It is only where unavoidably necessary to prevent an immediate and grave danger to the security and welfare of the community that infringement of religious freedom may be justified, and only to the smallest extent necessary to avoid the danger. 3. The constitutional provision prohibiting the establishment of religion only prohibits legislation for the support of any religious tenets or the modes of worship of any sect, this forestalling compulsion by law of the acceptance of any creed or the practice of any form of worship, but also assures the free exercise of ones chosen form of religion within the limits of utmost amplitude. It has been said that the religion clause of the Constitution are all designed to protect the broadest possible liberty of conscience, to allow each man to believe as his conscience directs, to profess his beliefs, and to live as he believes he ought to live, consistent with the liberty of others and with the common good. Any legislation whose effect or purpose is to
impede the observance of one or all religions or to discriminate invidiously between
religions is invalid, even though the burden may be characterized as being only indirect. But, if the state regulates conduct by enacting, within its power, a general law which has for its purpose and effect to advance the States secular goals, the statute is valid despite its indirect burden on religious observance, unless the State can accomplish its purpose without imposing such burden. 4. A religious test required for the exercise of a right needs a right to be exercised.