Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
8:30-10:00
10:00-11:30
11:30-1:00
1:00-2:30
2:45-4:15
Plenary
Session:
The Time Has Come : Replacing or Enhancing Your Legacy CSE System
Schedule:
Tuesday a.m.
Workshop
Coordinator:
Speakers:
Description:
Welcome, introductions and an overview of the sessions to be covered at this symposium. This Plenary session will examine the steps
to take if your computer system is past its prime, its useful life. Providing a general overview of the steps States and Territories need
to take when considering replacing or substantially enhancing their legacy CSE system, our speaker will discuss the various technical
assistance and training materials currently available, initiatives being developed and implemented to new systems, and introduce
specific OCSE staff assigned to assist States.
Schedule:
Workshop
Coordinator
:
Speakers:
Tuesday a.m.
Description:
As our human services systems mature to the point of obsolescence, States are looking to replace their aging legacy child support
systems with more modern platforms, including as part of an enterprise architecture model, to achieve new levels of return on
investment, enhanced data sharing, and improved service delivery to clients. This session will examine the obstacles and opportunities
States face in planning new automated systems, including enterprise solutions. From garnering stakeholder buy-in and executive
support, through defining project scope, to the weighty issues of securing Federal funding and cost allocation, the speakers will touch on
and examine these and many other policy and process considerations in planning your next project.
Session:
Schedule:
Workshop
Coordinator:
Speakers:
Description:
James E. Hicks, IT Specialist, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE JEHicks@acf.hhs.gov
TBD
Requests For Information (RFIs): A First Step In Planning Your Next System?
[Feasibility Studies Part I]
Tuesday p.m.
Sha-ron Johnson, IT Specialist, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE Sha-ron.Johnson@acf.hhs.gov
Invited- Daise Blue (NC), Jason Johnson( TN), Jean Truyter ( MT)
All too often, our staffs that planned and helped acquire our current child support systems some fifteen or twenty (or more) years ago
are no longer with the Department. Your agencys corporate knowledge may now be severely limited as to what types of systems and
automation solutions are available today, and how Federal procurement policy and system acquisition requirements have changed
over the years. Could a Request for Proposal (RFI) help you investigate the possibilities. This session will look in detail at three such
RFIs: for systems planning, how they were constructed, their scopes of work, what they sought from the vendor community, the
support the Federal Office was able to provide, and of course, the outcomes. This session will also examine how these RFIs
supported development of the subsequent, foundational Feasibility Studies and Analyses of Alternatives work that are the
underpinning of any States acquisition of a new or replacement Child Support Enforcement System (CSES).
Session:
Schedule:
Workshop
Coordinator:
Speakers:
Description:
Laying The Foundation To Federal Funding Of Your Next Project: Feasibility Studies And
Analysis Of Alternatives. [Feasibility Studies Part II]
Tuesday p.m.
Joseph Bodmer, PMP, Senior IT Specialist, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE
Joseph.Bodmer@acf.hhs.gov
The foundation to the Federal Office of Child Support Enforcements funding of a States new system development or replacement
project is the execution of a thorough Feasibility Study, one that successfully meets the five criteria for approval: accuracy,
measurability, repeatability, consistency, and reasonableness. From describing why there is such a Federal emphasis on detailed
planning, to defining how Feasibility Studies, including their Analyses of Alternatives, are composed, to envisioning, creating, and
documenting the Functional Cost-Benefit Analysis Models used in Feasibility Studies, to the intricacies and logical progressions in
documenting all the evaluations and scoring involved. This session will help explain why these strategic studies are so critical to
garnering Federal funding in your next project and how you can build a winning plan the first time through.
Session:
Schedule:
Workshop
Coordinator:
Speakers:
Description:
Implementation Advance Planning Documents (IAPD), Annual APD Updates, And The
Revenue Stream Model For Reporting Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)
Wednesday p.m.
Jean Cost, Systems Analyst, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE Jean.cost@acf.hhs.gov
TBD
So youve finished that Feasibility Study, and gotten the Feds approval of it. Youve been building the Implementation Advance
Planning Document (IAPD), using a lot of the information from the Feasibility Study to create the six sections of the IAPD, so what
could possibly go wrong? Not much, but did you know theres an insurance policy against a lot of the rework that often accompanies
IAPD submissions? This session will explain how an IAPD is constructed, detail the differences between this initial project funding
document and future Annual APD Updates to it, and give you an in-depth explanation of how to create a Cost-Benefit Analysis for the
IAPD using the Revenue Stream Model.
Schedule:
Session:
Workshop
Coordinator:
Speakers:
Description:
Independent Verification And Validation (IV&V) What It Is, What It Aint, And Why
Wednesday a.m.
David Tabler, Systems Analyst, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE Dtabler@acf.hhs.gov
TBD
Considering a new systems acquisition effort? Well this session may be for you. Few things actually cause State staffs, including
program directors, more consternation than learning that they now must acquire Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V)
services on their systems project. Today, four States have IV&V services on their new systems development efforts, and all States
acquiring new systems are subject to this standard monitoring and oversight activity. This session will examine what IV&V is and is
not, how it differs from quality assurance (QA), how you can procure these services, and how the Federal OCSE determines IV&Vs
scope, frequency of review, and for how long these services will be needed on your project.
Systems
WednesdayPolicy
p.m. issues
Joe Bodmer, PMP, Senior IT Specialist, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE Jbodmer@acf.hhs.gov
TBD
This session will provide both an overview of state systems policy issues described in OCSEs update of its major IT policy guidance,
Action Transmittal (AT) 90-11, now cited as AT-06-03, as well as present some detailed discussion of certain of the policy positions in
AT-06-03 through the use of case studies and practical scenarios.
Session:
Child Support And The Enterprise: Cost Allocation In Enterprise Architecture Projects
Thursday a.m.
Mike Rifkin Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE Mrifkin@acf.hhs.gov
TBD
So youve finished that Feasibility Study, and gotten the Feds in Medicaid, Food Stamps, Child Welfare and Child Support to approve
it. Now you have to craft an Implementation Advance Planning Document (IAPD) that includes a cost allocated budget. But you have
a lot of questions to answer first, like:
How do you handle the fact that Child Support will be the first system? It doesnt seem fair to have Child Support pay for it all
up front, does it?
Which costs are direct billable to a single program versus costs that must be shared and thus allocated?
What happens when other State and Federally-funded programs want to join the Enterprise Project later on?
How do I allocate costs to really small programs that cant afford it?
This session will look at these and a growing list of issues that Federal entitlement programs like Child Support, Food Stamps,
Medicaid and Child Welfare have been grappling with for the last few years. Hear the problems the Feds have answered as consensus
solutions, and the remaining issues that theyve decided can only be resolved on a case-by-case basis.
Wrap Up
//
Schedule:
Workshop
Coordinator
:
Speakers:
Thursday a.m.
Description:
Development of action items. What ideas do you plan to take back to your State? What do you need from Federal staff, (either Central
or Regional office). Suggestions for future Affinity teleconferences (i.e. FIDM, Licensing,) What topics would you like us to provide a
PAID Update on? PAID in Full topics? In-depth guidance.
Plenary
Session:
The Time Has Come : Replacing or Enhancing Your Legacy CSE System
Schedule:
Tuesday a.m.
Workshop
Coordinator:
Speakers:
Description:
Welcome, introductions and an overview of the sessions to be covered at this symposium. This Plenary session will examine the steps
to take if your computer system is past its prime, its useful life. Providing a general overview of the steps States and Territories need
to take when considering replacing or substantially enhancing their legacy CSE system, our speaker will discuss the various technical
assistance and training materials currently available, initiatives being developed and implemented to new systems, and introduce
specific OCSE staff assigned to assist States.
Overview
of Federal submission requirements for Advance Planning Documents (APDs):
Tuesday a.m.
Practical Solutions and Tips For Building An Acceptable APD Update The First Time
Mike Rifkin, IT Specialist, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE Mrifkin@acf.hhs.gov
Speakers:
TBD
Description:
This session will cover the information necessary for an Annual APD Update and when an As-Needed APDU is required and how the
submission information differs. When is your next Annual APD due? Why does OCSE need actuals expenditures data from the
previous year in the APD Update? This session will address these and many other more information requirements, including:
What information and data is needed by the Federal staff to process your FFP request.
What happens when you dont submit complete information in a timely manner.
And a step-through, with examples, of many of the reasons that APD Updates are not approved.
Session:
Schedule:
Workshop
Coordinator:
Speakers:
Description:
Procurements, Contracts, And Competition Know The Rules To Use So You Dont Lose
Tuesday p.m.
Walt Zeitschel, Systems Analyst, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE Wzeitschel@acf.hhs.gov
TBD
Attendees to this session will share in a wide-ranging procurement and acquisitions discussion. Some the topics in this session
include:
The dollar thresholds that determine when you will need to submit your procurement to OCSE for prior Federal approval.
Federal procurement rules and regulations that govern sole source and single source justifications.
Master contracts and how you can take advantage of them to expedite Federal approval.
Federal regulatory requirements for full and open competition, and why this is so critical to securing Federal funding.
When you obtain your IT services from a different agency what needs to be submitted and to whom?
This session will also step-through examples and samples of various acquisition vehicles, including Requests For Proposal (RFP).
Invitations To Bid (ITB), Requests For Quote (RFQ), etc., and present some of the more critical clauses that affect Federal approval.
10
Schedule:
Session:
Workshop
Coordinator:
The Electronic APD OCSEs Ongoing Effort To Streamline The Federal Advance Planning
Document (APD) and Contracts Approval Process
Tuesday p.m.
Stan Slominski, Systems Analyst, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE Sslominski@acf.hhs.gov
Joseph Bodmer, PMP, Senior IT Specialist, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE
Walter Zeitschel, Systems Analyst, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE
The Presidents Management Initiative looks at e-government as a vital cog in making the Federal workforce more effective and
responsive. In keeping with the administrations goals, OCSE has undertaken to move the APD and procurements approval processes
to electronic formats, potentially saving tens of thousands of State and contractor staff hours every year, and streamlining the time and
effectiveness of Federal reviews and funding approval decisions. Hear where the design is today, what the schedule for delivery of a
prototype is, and when you might be able to pilot test the design with your next APD Update.
Wednesday
a.m.-Roundtable
Plenary
State
Systems
New automation initiatives
Joanne Benson, IT Specialist, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE Joanne.Benson@acf.hhs.gov
Speakers:
Description:
The intent of this session is to go around the room and have all State and Territorial participants give the top 3 automation initiatives
that they are planning for the next year(s) that will impact collection of current support or reduction of arrearages. Heres your
chance.
11
Session:
Schedule:
Workshop
Coordinator:
Speakers:
Description:
12
13
Schedule:
Workshop
Coordinator:
Speakers:
Description:
Session:
Schedule:
Workshop
Coordinator:
Speakers:
Description:
Web-based initiatives
Thursday a.m.
Greg Jordan, IT Specialist, Division of State and Tribal Systems, OCSE Gjordan@acf.hhs.gov
TBD
This session will look at web-based Customer Service Websites, Employer Outreach websites, QUICK interfaces,
14
Wrap Up
//
Schedule:
Workshop
Coordinator
:
Speakers:
Thursday a.m.
Description:
Development of action items. What ideas do you plan to take back to your State? What do you need from Federal staff, (either Central
or Regional office). Suggestions for future Affinity teleconferences (i.e. FIDM, Licensing,) What topics would you like us to provide a
PAID Update on? PAID in Full topics? In-depth guidance.
Homework Help
https://www.homeworkping.com/
15