Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1.SUMMARY
The paper describes results of computations of
resistance, trim and sinkage for the KRISO
Container Ship (KCS) at different Froude numbers
in calm water. Unstructured trimmed grids with
local refinement in zones of interest have been used
to obtain maximum accuracy at low cell count. The
solution method is of finite-volume type and uses
mostly approximations of second order. Free surface
is modeled using Volume-of-Fluid approach and a
high-resolution interface-capturing scheme. It is
demonstrated that acceptable accuracy can be
achieved with grids containing around half a million
cells for half of the geometry.
2. INTRODUCTION
Industrial use of Computational Fluid Dynamics
(CFD) requires high level of automation, in order to
provide sufficient accuracy at low effort (both in
terms of manpower and computing time). Therefore
the design of computational grid requires some
effort, so that grid refinement and modifications to
geometry can easily be done. All computations
reported here were performed using the same grid
topology described in the next section. All grids
were created and all computations and postprocessing were performed using STAR-CCM+
code.
The solution method is of finite-volume type and
uses control volumes of arbitrary polyhedral shape.
The conservation equations in integral form for
mass and momentum, together with an equation for
volume fraction of liquid and two or more equations
describing turbulence quantities, are solved using a
segregated iterative solution method based on
SIMPLE-algorithm. Details on discretization and
solution methods can be found in literature and will
not be given here (see Ferziger and Peri, 2003;
Demirdi and Muzaferija, 1995; Weiss et al, 1999).
All surface and volume integrals are approximated
3. GRID GENERATION
In this study trimmed hexahedral grids with local
refinements and prism layers along walls were used.
The grid generation process is driven by specifying
base mesh size, relative to which all spacings (prism
layer thickness, cell size in various regions etc.) are
defined. Finer meshes of the same topology are then
automatically created by just reducing the base size.
In order to avoid using fine grid where it is not
necessary (in front of hull and at larger distance
above, below, on each side and behind the hull),
local volumes of different shape were created and
assigned particular cell size, resulting in mesh
structure shown in Fig. 1 for the coarsest mesh.
There were 6 prism layers along walls (except for nonwetted walls) and the next-to-wall cells were 0.9 mm
thick (prism layer was 20 mm thick, cell expansion
ratio was 1.5). Figure 2 shows the fine mesh segments.
CT (103)
CF (103) CP (103)
Coarse
3.568 (+0.31%)
2,873
0,695
Medium
3.574 (+0.48%)
2,911
0,663
Fine
3.561 (+0.11%)
2,909
0,652
k-
k-
k- SST
standard two-layer
RSM
3.610
3.591
3.425
3.638
(+1.49%)
(+0.96%)
(-3.71%)
(+2.28%)
3.588
3.560
3.415
3.623
(+0.87%)
(+0.08%)
(-4.86%)
(+1.86%)