Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
with palpitations may not require such careful follow-up. The initial
clinical assessment should, therefore, include an educated estimation of the likelihood of a relevant underlying arrhythmia in a
patient with palpitations (gatekeeper function).
The current management of patients with palpitations is guided
chiefly by the clinical experience of the physician. Indeed, the literature lacks specific policy documents or recommendations
regarding the most appropriate diagnostic work-up to be
adopted in individual patients. The aim of this article is to
propose expert advice for diagnostic evaluation in order to
guide optimal management of patients with palpitations.
Definition
Palpitations are a symptom defined as awareness of the heartbeat
and are described by patients as a disagreeable sensation of pulsation
or movement in the chest and/or adjacent areas.7 Implicit in that
awareness is a sense of unpleasantness which may be associated
with discomfort, alarm, and less commonly pain. As this awareness
causes the individual to mentally focus on their heartbeat, the
nature of the heartbeat, both in terms of its perceived forcefulness and its rate, is assimilated into the term. Therefore, the
term is used to describe a patients subjective perception of abnormal cardiac activity in a way that may be associated with a symptomatic cardiac arrhythmia. However, because palpitations are a
symptom with a broad range of causes and underlying diseases,
it does not have a rigorous and definable clinical correlate.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +39 0419657201; fax: +39 0419657235, Email: araviele@tin.it
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. & The Author 2011. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Introduction
921
Pathophysiology
Little is known about the events responsible for heartbeat sensation, the afferent sensory pathways that are involved, or the
higher-order cognitive processing that filters, modulates, and
amplifies these stimuli and brings some to conscious attention.10
Possible sensory receptors are myocardial, pericardial, and peripheral mechanoreceptors, and/or peripheral baroreceptors with
their afferent parasympathetic and sympathtic pathways.11,12 Possible brain centres involved in the elaboration of afferent stimuli are
the subcortical areas (thalamus, amygdala) and the base of the
frontal lobes.
Cardiac arrhythmias
Supraventricular/ventricular extrasystoles
Supraventricular/ventricular tachycardias
Bradyarrhythmias: severe sinus bradycardia, sinus pauses, secondand third-degree atrioventricular block
Anomalies in the functioning and/or programming of pacemakers
and ICDs
Structural heart diseases
Mitral valve prolapse
Severe mitral regurgitation
Severe aortic regurgitation
Congenital heart diseases with significant shunt
Cardiomegaly and/or heart failure of various aetiologies
Hyperthrophic cardiomyopathy
Mechanical prosthetic valves
Psychosomatic disorders
Anxiety, panic attacks
Depression, somatization disorders
Systemic causes
Hyperthyroidism, hypoglycaemia, postmenopausal syndrome, fever,
anaemia, pregnancy, hypovolaemia, orthostatic hypotension,
postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, pheochromocytoma,
arteriovenous fistula
Effects of medical and recreational drugs
Sympathicomimetic agents in pump inhalers, vasodilators,
anticholinergics, hydralazine
Recent withdrawal of b-blockers
Alcohol, cocaine, heroin, amphetamines, caffeine, nicotine, cannabis,
synthetic drugs
Weight reductions drugs
Aetiological classification
From the aetiological point of view, the causes of palpitations can
be subdivided into five main groups (Table 1): cardiac arrhythmias,
structural heart diseases, psychosomatic disorders, systemic diseases,
and effects of medical and recreational drugs.3 9 It is not uncommon,
however, for the patient to have more than one potential cause or
type of palpitation. Electrocardiographic documentation of a
rhythm disorder during spontaneous symptoms provides the
strongest evidence of causality; whenever this proves possible,
therefore, the palpitations are classified as being of arrhythmic
origin. By contrast, they are considered to be of non-arrhythmic
origin when the underlying heart rhythm exhibits sinus rhythm
or sinus tachycardia. Thus, according to this aetiological hierarchy,
non-arrhythmic causes of palpitations emerge as definitive diagnoses only in cases in which the symptomelectrocardiogram
(ECG) correlation excludes the presence of rhythm disorders.8
When it is not possible to document the cardiac rhythm during
palpitations, non-arrhythmic causes are regarded as probable, but
not definitive.
From the pathophysiological standpoint, the mechanisms underlying palpitations are somewhat heterogeneous: contractions of the
heart that are too rapid, irregular or particularly slow, as in cardiac
arrhythmias including sinus tachycardia secondary to mental disturbance, systemic diseases, or the use of certain medications;
very intense contractions and anomalous movements of the heart in
the chest, as in the case of some structural heart diseases associated
with increased stroke volume; anomalies in the subjective perception
of the heartbeat, whereby a normal heart rhythm or minimal irregularities in the cardiac rhythm are felt by the patient and are poorly
tolerated, as in the case of some psychosomatic disorders. It is
arguable that the pathophysiology of palpitations in these cases is
a centrally mediated fright reaction that initiates a series of
responses which include perception of the beating heart.1
It is important to underline the fact that, although cardiac
rhythm disorders generally give rise to palpitations (or other
related symptoms, such as fatigue, dyspnoea, dizziness, syncope,
and angina), in some subjects, for reasons not entirely known
but probably linked to some clinical characteristics (long-standing
arrhythmias with relatively low maximum ventricular rate, male
sex, absence of coronary heart disease, and congestive heart
failure) or to the presence of peripheral neuropathy (e.g. diabetic
patients), arrhythmias including prognostically relevant disorders
such as non-sustained ventricular tachycardias and atrial fibrillation
may remain completely asymptomatic.11,13 15 Thus, in such
patients, relevant arrhythmias might not be adequately diagnosed
and managed.15
922
atrial tachycardia with variable atrioventricular conduction, torsades
de pointes).16,17 By contrast, bradyarrhythmias are more rarely perceived as palpitations: these arrhythmias comprise sinus pauses and
severe sinus bradycardia seen in sick sinus syndrome, sudden onset
of high-degree atrioventricular block, or of intermittent left-bundle
branch block. Anomalies in the functioning and/or programming of
pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs)
(pacemaker-mediated tachycardia, pectoral or diaphragmatic
stimulation, pacemaker syndrome, etc.) may also be responsible
for palpitations.
Epidemiology
The prevalence of palpitations is dependent on definitions and
diagnostic methods used and varies substantially in different populations. Nevertheless, there is evidence that palpitations are a very
frequent symptom in the general population2,9 and, in particular, in
patients suffering from hypertension or heart disease. In studies in
primary care settings, palpitations account for 16% of the symptoms
that prompt patients to visit their general practitioner, and are
second only to chest pain as the presenting complaint for specialist
cardiologic evaluation.1,3,4 This high prevalence of palpitations
emphasizes the need for a structured, ideally evidence-based, stepwise work-up that may allow to distinguish, since the beginning,
between patients with benign prognosis and those with poorer
prognosis.
With regard to the prevalence of the various causes of palpitations, clinical evidence indicates that a considerable number of subjects with palpitations have normal sinus rhythm or minor rhythm
anomalies, such as short bursts of supraventricular extrasystoles or
sporadic ventricular extrasystoles. Nevertheless, clinically significant arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation/flutter or paroxysmal
supraventricular tachycardias are also a frequent finding.45,46 In a
prospective study by Weber and Kapoor47 in 190 patients presenting with a complaint of palpitations at an university medical centre,
palpitations were due to arrhythmias in 41% of these patients (16%
of whom had atrial fibrillation/flutter, 10% had supraventricular
tachycardia, and 2% had ventricular tachycardia), to structural
heart disease in 3%, to psychosomatic disorders in 31% (mainly
panic and anxiety disorders), to systemic causes in 4%, and to the
use of a medication, illicit substances, or stimulants in 6%. According
to the case records, the prevalence of anxiety syndrome and panic
attacks in patients with palpitations ranges from 15% to 31%.20 22
In the study by Weber and Kapoor,47 male sex, description of an
A. Raviele et al.
923
Prognosis
Clinical presentation
Duration and frequency of palpitations
With regard to duration, palpitations may be either short-lasting or
persistent. In short-lasting forms, the symptom terminates spontaneously within a brief period of time. In persistent forms, the palpitations are ongoing and terminate only after adequate medical
treatment. With regard to frequency, palpitations may occur
daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly.
Types of palpitations
Patients report a wide range of sensations to describe their symptoms. The most common descriptions, and those most useful in
clinical practice in differential diagnoses among the various
causes of palpitations, enable palpitations to be classified according
to the rate, rhythm, and intensity of heartbeat5 9,59,60: extrasystolic
palpitations, tachycardiac palpitations, anxiety-related palpitations,
and pulsation palpitations (Table 2). It should, however, be stressed
that patients are not always able to describe the characteristics of
their symptoms precisely. It may therefore be difficult to identify
the type of palpitation accurately, especially in the case of normalrate palpitations.5,9,61
Extrasystolic palpitations, due to ectopic beats, generally produce
feelings of missing/skipping a beat and/or a sinking of the heart
interspersed with periods during which the heart beats normally;
patients report that the heart seems to stop and then start
again, causing an unpleasant, almost painful, sensation of a blow
to the chest. Linked to the presence of atrial or ventricular extrasystolic beats, this type of palpitation is frequently encountered
even in young subjects, often in the absence of heart disease,
and generally has a benign prognosis. In extrasystolic palpitations,
particularly if they are of ventricular origin, the sensation is due
to the increased strength of contraction of the post-extrasystolic
924
A. Raviele et al.
Subjective
description
Heartbeat
Onset and
termination
Trigger
situations
Extrasystolic
Skipping/missing a
beat, sinking of the
heart
Sudden
Rest
Tachycardiac
Regular or irregular,
markedly accelerated
Sudden
Physical effort,
cooling down
Anxiety-related
Anxiety, agitation
Regular, slightly
accelerated
Gradual
Stress, Anxiety
attacks
Pulsation
Heart pounding
Gradual
Physical effort
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Heartbeat
Trigger situations
Associated symptoms
Vagal manoeuvres
AVRT, AVNRT
Sudden interruption
Atrial fibrillation
Polyuria
Transitory reduction
in heart rate
Ventricular
tachycardias
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Physical effort
Signs/symptoms of
haemodynamic
impairment
No effect
AVRT, atrio-ventricular reentrant tachycardia; AVNRT, atrio-ventricular node reentrant tachycardia; A-V, atrioventricular.
Transitory reduction
in heart rate
925
Diagnostic strategy
In patients with palpitations the diagnostic strategy should aim at:
(i) distinguishing the mechanism of the palpitations; (ii) obtaining
an electrocardiographic recording during symptoms; and (iii) evaluating the underlying heart disease. All patients suffering from palpitations should therefore undergo an initial clinical evaluation
comprising history, physical examination, and a standard 12-lead
ECG (Figure 1). This usually should be performed in a primary
care setting.
In specific situations, specialist evaluation and certain specific
instrumental and laboratory investigations should be considered.59
Definitive or
suspected diagnosis
confirmation
treatment
unexplained palpitations
no heart disease
and normal ECG
heart disease or
abnormal ECG
Echo,AECG,MRI*,
Stress Test*, EPS*
treatment
ILR
frequent or
severe
rare or well
tolerated
stop
Figure 1 Diagnostic flow-chart of patients with palpitations. *Indicated only in selected cases; refers to ECG symptom correlation available. ECG, electrocardiogram (12-lead); Echo, echocardiography; AECG, ambulatory ECG; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; EPS, electrophysiological study; ILR, implantable loop recorder.
926
an arrhythmia centre, and second-level investigations should be considered; these include ambulatory ECG monitoring and electrophysiological study (EPS) (Figure 1). Finally, second-level
investigations should also be carried out in patients with palpitations
of unknown origin whose symptoms are frequent or associated with
impaired haemodynamic function or impaired quality of life or states of
anxiety.9
A. Raviele et al.
927
Physical examination
Standard electrocardiogram
During palpitations
If the patient is examined during palpitations, 12-lead ECG represents the diagnostic gold standard. Thus, patients should be
advised to come as quickly as possible to an emergency department or a physician when an ECG has never been recorded
during symptoms. It allows the physician to analyse P and QRS
morphologies and the relationship between these two waves,
and the frequency and regularity of the heart rhythm, and finally
brings an accurate diagnosis on the concordance between palpitations and the presence or absence of arrhythmia. This distinction
between arrhythmic or non-arrhythmic palpitation is of paramount
Suspected disease
Long QT syndrome
Short QT syndrome
Brugada syndrome
Arrythmogenic right
ventricular
cardiomyopathy
................................................................................
Hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy
During palpitations
The execution of the physical examination while the patient is still
symptomatic is not the most frequent situation. However, when
this occurs it is crucial to have some notions about frequency
and regularity of heart rhythm by listening to the patients chest
or by palpation of the arterial pulse. The differential diagnosis of
various types of tachycardia may be guided by vagal manoeuvres68
such as carotid sinus massage: sudden interruption of the tachycardia is highly suggestive of a tachycardia involving the atrioventricular junction whereas a temporary reduction of the frequency is
suggestive of atrial fibrillation, flutter, or atrial tachycardia (Table 3).
When this essential stage has been performed, examination
should aim to evaluate the tolerance of a possible heart rhythm
disturbance (blood pressure, signs of cardiac failure, and so on),
to assess the cardiovascular status (i.e. the presence of structural
heart disease), and, in case of a sinus rhythm or sinus tachycardia,
to evaluate the presence of systemic diseases potentially responsible for palpitations.
928
In the absence of palpitations
Even when the ECG is recorded in the absence of palpitations it
provides important data that can suggest the arrhythmic origin of
palpitations (Tables 6 and 7). In some instances, for example in
case of evident pre-excitation when the patient reports rapid
regular palpitations, the diagnosis is formal even if tachycardia
has never been recorded.
Ambulatory electrocardiogram
monitoring
Characteristics
Holter monitoring
Event recorders
External loop
recorders
Mobile cardiac
outpatient
telemetry
................................................................................
Implantable loop
recorders
Pacemakers/ICDs
Diagnostic value
Ambulatory ECG monitoring is regarded as diagnostic only when it is
possible to establish a correlation between palpitations and an electrocardiographic recording.69,70 In patients who do not develop
A. Raviele et al.
929
Limitations
Ambulatory ECG monitoring has some important limitations.
Indeed, it is not always possible to formulate a precise diagnosis
of the type of arrhythmia recorded, especially when single-lead
ECG devices are used. For example, it may be difficult to make a
correct differential diagnosis between a supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant conduction and a ventricular tachycardia. Moreover, ambulatory ECG monitoring is unable to distinguish with
certainty between bradyarrhythmias due to a reflex mechanism
and those caused by a disorder of the cardiac conduction
system, a distinction that has prognostic and therapeutic implications. Finally, ambulatory ECG monitoring requires the patient
Indications
According to the ACC/AHA guidelines for the use of ambulatory
ECG monitoring,69,70 recurrent palpitations of unknown origin
constitute a class-I indication for long-term ECG monitoring. The
recommendations regarding the choice of the ambulatory ECG
monitoring device most suited to the individual patient are
reported in Table 9. ILRs are used in selected patients with
severe and infrequent palpitations (inter-symptom interval .4
weeks) and when all other investigations, including external ambulatory ECG monitoring, prove to be negative.66
Electrophysiological study
Electrophysiological study, as an invasive procedure, is usually considered at the end of the diagnostic work-up. However, EPS has
some important advantages over ambulatory ECG monitoring.
First of all, it is able to correctly identify the type of arrhythmia
responsible for the palpitations. Moreover, it enables ablative
therapy of the induced tachyarrhythmias to be performed during
the same session in which the diagnosis is made. Finally, while
EPS enables a diagnosis to be made and specific therapy to be
initiated immediately, ambulatory ECG monitoring requires the
patient to experience a recurrence of symptoms. This delays the
diagnosis and, should the palpitations be due to malignant arrhythmias, exposes the patient to the potential risk of adverse events.
For this reason, in patients with significant heart disease and in
those with palpitations that precede syncope, in whom the risk
of adverse events is higher, electrophysiological evaluation generally precedes the use of ambulatory ECG monitoring. In all other
cases, it normally follows ambulatory ECG monitoring when the
latter proves non-diagnostic. For the recommendations of EPS in
patients with palpitations of unknown origin we refer the
readers to the ACC/AHA/ESC 2003 Guidelines on supraventricular arrhythmias16 and the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for
management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death.17
930
A. Raviele et al.
Table 9 Advantages, limitations, and indications of the different ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring devices
Holter monitoring
Event recorders
External loop
recorders/MCOT
Implantable loop
recorders
Pacemakers/ICDs
Better discrimination
between ventricular and
supraventricular
arrhythmias, due to dual
chamber IEGM
recordings; better
definition of arrhythmic
burden; monitoring
duration for many years
(corresponding to the
expected life of the
device); possibility to
record asymptomatic
arrhythmias
automatically
Invasiveness; risk of early
and late local and
systemic complications;
high costs
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Low cost; possibility to
record asymptomatic
arrhythmias
Retrospective and
prospective ECG
records; possibility to
record asymptomatic
arrhythmias
automatically
Retrospective and
prospective ECG
records; quite good
ECG records;
monitoring capability up
to 36 months; possibility
to record asymptomatic
arrhythmias
automatically
Limitations
Monitoring limited to
24 h to 7 days; size
may prevent
activities that may
trigger the
arrhythmias; patients
often fail to complete
adequately the
clinical diary upon
which the
correlation between
symptoms and the
arrhythmias
recorded is based
Monitoring cannot be
carried out for more
than 3 4 weeks; very
brief arrhythmias are
not recorded;
arrhythmic triggers
are not revealed;
poor ECG records
Monitoring cannot be
carried out for more
than 3 4 weeks;
continual
maintenance is
required; devices are
uncomfortable; quite
poor ECG records
Indications
From weekly to
monthly, fairly
long-lasting
palpitations not
accompanied by
haemodynamic
impairment;
compliant patients
From weekly to
monthly,
short-lasting
palpitations
associated to
haemodynamic
impairment; very
compliant patients
burden for the evaluation of thromboembolic risk, and more information is still needed.67,91
Therapy
Therapy for palpitations is, of course, directed towards the aetiological cause (i.e. treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, structural heart
diseases, psychosomatic disorders, or systemic diseases) whenever
it can be determined. However, many of the suggestions that can
be made are based on clinical experience, without scientific documentation to rely on.
Advantages
931
Diagnostic purposes
Therapeutic purposes
The criteria for the hospitalization of patients with palpitations for
therapeutic purposes are reported in Table 11. Generally, patients
with cardiac arrhythmias and/or structural heart disease will need
emergency hospitalization when they complain of palpitations
associated with haemodynamic compromise, chest pain, or
syncope, as well as if implantation or revision of implanted
devices is indicated.117 121
Conflicts of interest: A.R. is a consultant for sanofi-aventis,
Boehringer-Ingheleim, Biosense Webster, and St Jude Medical,
and has received honoraria from sanofi-aventis, Boehringer Ingheleim, and Medtronic. L.M. has received honoraria or consulting fees
from Bard, Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, St Jude
Medical, Sanofi Aventis, Biotronik, and Sorin Group, and has
received research grants from Biosense Webster, Medtronic,
Boston Scientific, and St Jude Medical. C.B.-L. has received research
grants from Octopus, AtriCure, and Medtronic. M.J.P.R. is a consultant or advisory-board member for Biosense Webster, Boehringer Ingelheim, St Jude Medical, and Stereotaxis. J.M.M. is a
consultant to Medtronic, has received honoraria from Boston
Scientific and St Jude Medical, and has had research support
from all three companies.
References
1. Mayou R. Chest pain, palpitations and panic. J Psychosom Res 1998;44:5370.
2. Messineo FC. Ventricular ectopic activity: prevalence and risk. Am J Cardiol 1989;
64:53J 6J.
Diagnostic purposes
932
A. Raviele et al.
56. Delise P, Guiducci U, Zeppilli P, DAndrea L, Proto C, Bettini R et al. Cardiological guidelines for competitive sports eligibility. Ital Heart J 2005;6:661 702.
57. Pelliccia A, Zipes DP, Maron BJ. Bethesda Conference #36 and the European
Society of Cardiology consensus recommendations revisited: a comparison of
U.S. and European criteria for eligibility and disqualification of competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1990 6.
58. Barsky AJ, Cleary PD, Coeytaux RR, Ruskin JN. The clinical course of palpitations in medical outpatients. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1782 8.
59. Hlatky MA. Approach to the patient with palpitations. In Goldman L,
Braunwald E (eds). Primary Cardiology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1998.
p122 8.
60. Zipes DP, Miles WM, Klein LS. Assessment of patients with cardiac arrhythmia.
In Zipes DP, Jalife J (eds). Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1995. p1009 12.
61. Leitch J, Klein G, Yee R. Can patients discriminate between atrial fibrillation and
regular supraventricular tachycardia? Am J Cardiol 1991;68:962 6.
62. Leitch JW, Klein GJ, Yee R, Leather RA, Kim YH. Syncope associated with supraventricular tachycardia. An expression of tachycardia rate or vasomotor
response? Circulation 1992;85:1064 71.
63. Brignole M, Gianfranchi L, Menozzi C, Raviele A, Oddone D, Lolli G et al. Role of
autonomic reflexes in syncope associated with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Am
Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1123 9.
64. Gonzalez-Torrecilla E, Almendral J, Arenal A, Atienza F, Atea LF, del Castillo S
et al. Combined evaluation of bedside clinical variables and the electrocardiogram for the differential diagnosis of paroxysmal atrioventricular reciprocating
tachycardias in patients without pre-excitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:
235961.
65. Gursoy S, Steurer G, Brugada J, Andries E, Brugada P. Brief report: the hemodynamic mechanism of pounding in the neck in atrioventricular nodal reentrant
tachycardia. N Engl J Med 1992;327:772 4.
66. Brignole M, Vardas P, Hoffman E, Huikuri H, Moya A, Ricci R et al. Indications for
the use of diagnostic implantable and external ECG loop recorders. Europace
2009;11:67187.
67. Botto GL, Padeletti L, Santini M, Capucci A, Gulizia M, Zolezzi F et al. Presence
and duration of atrial fibrillation detected by continuous monitoring: crucial
implications for the risk of thromboembolic events. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
2009;20:2418.
68. Brembilla-Perrot B. Pharmacological testing in the diagnosis of arrhythmias.
Minerva Cardioangiol 2010;58:505 17.
69. Crawford MH, Bernstein SJ, Deedwania PC, Di Marco JP, Ferrick KJ, Garson AJ
et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiographyexecutive
summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee
to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography). Circulation 1999;
100:886 93.
70. Kadish AH, Buxton AE, Kennedy HL, Knight BP, Mason JW, Schuger JD et al.
ACC/AHA clinical competence statement on electrocardiography and ambulatory electrocardiography: a report of the ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM Task Force on
Clinical Competence (ACC/AHA Committee to Develop a Clinical Competence Statement on Electrocardiography and Ambulatory Electrocardiography),
endorsed by the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:2091 100.
71. Scherr D, Dalal D, Henrikson CA, Spragg DD, Berger RD, Calkins H et al. Prospective comparison of the diagnostic utility of a standard event monitor versus
a leadless portable ECG monitor in the evaluation of patients with palpitations.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2008;22:39 44.
72. Kaleschke G, Hoffmann B, Drewitz I, Steinbeck G, Naebauer M, Goette A et al.
Prospective, multicentre validation of a simple, patient-operated electrocardiographic system for the detection of arrhythmias and electrocardiographic
changes. Europace 2009;11:1362 8.
73. Olson JA, Fouts AM, Padalinam BJ, Prystowsky EN. Utility of mobile outpatient
telemetry for the diagnosis of palpitations, presyncope, syncope, and the assessment of therapy efficacy. J Cardiovasc Electrophsiol 2007;18:473 7.
74. Rothman SA, Laughlin JC, Seltzer J, Walia JS, Baman RI, Siouffi SY et al. The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event
monitoring. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007;18:248 9.
75. Reiffel JA, Schulhof E, Joseph B. Optimum duration of transtelephonic ECG
monitoring when used for transient symptomatic event detection.
J Electrocardiol 1991;24:1658.
76. Kinlay S, Leitch JW, Neil A. Cardiac event recorders yield more diagnoses and
are more cost-effective than 48-hour Holter monitoring in patients with palpitations. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:1620.
933
934
100. Keller DI, Rougier JS, Kucera JP, Bennamar N, Fressart V, Guicheney P et al.
Brugada syndrome and fever: genetic and molecular characterization of patients
carrying SCN5A mutations. Cardiovasc Res 2005;67:510 9.
101. Kum LC, Fung JW, Sanderson JE. Brugada syndrome unmasked by febrile illness.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:1660 1.
102. Morita H, Zipes DP, Morita ST, Wu J. Temperature modulation of ventricular
arrhythmogenicity in a canine tissue model of Brugada syndrome. Heart
Rhythm 2007;4:188 97.
103. Junttila MJ, Gonzalez M, Lizotte E, Benito B, Vernooy K, Sarkozy A et al. Induced
Brugada-type electrocardiogram, a sign for imminent malignant arrhythmias. Circulation 2008;117:1890 3.
104. Behr ER, Camm AJ. Letter by Behr and Camm regarding article Induced
Brugada-type electrocardiogram, a sign for imminent malignant arrhythmias. Circulation 2008;118:e701; author reply e702.
105. Viskin S, Lesh MD, Eldar M, Fish R, Setbon I, Laniado S et al. Mode of onset of
malignant ventricular arrhythmias in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. J Cardiovasc
Electrophysiol 1997;8:1115 20.
106. Haissaguerre M, Derval N, Sacher F, Jesel L, Deisenhofer I, de Roy L et al.
Sudden cardiac arrest associated with early repolarization. N Engl J Med 2008;
358:2016 23.
107. Rosso R, Kogan E, Belhassen B, Rozovki V, Scheinman MM, Zeltser D et al.
J-point elevation in survivors of primary ventricular fibrillation and matched
control subjects incidence and clinical significance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:
1231 8.
108. Viskin S. Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation Le Syndrome dHaissaguerre and the
fear of J waves. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:6202.
109. Pasquie JL, Sanders P, Hocini M, Hsu LF, Scavee C, Jais P et al. Fever as a precipitant of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation in patients with normal hearts.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004;15:1271 6.
110. Haissaguerre M, Shah DC, Jais P, Shoda M, Kautzner J, Arentz T et al. Role of
Purkinje conducting system in triggering of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.
Lancet 2002;359:677 8.
A. Raviele et al.