Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The
world
is
asking
where
Walter
Palmer
is
but
should
be
asking
why
are
Africa's
wildlife
populations
dwindling?
Following
the
death
of
"Cecil"
the
lion,
many
members
of
the
American
media
and
public
became
aware
of
the
degradation
of
Africa's
wildlife,
and
rightfully
expressed
outrage.
However,
many
of
the
reports
and
much
of
the
public
outrage
has
wrongfully
identified
legal
and
permitted
hunting
as
the
sole
culprit
responsible
for
Africa's
declining
wildlife
populations.
In
order
to
stop
Africas
wildlife
population
declines,
it
is
first
necessary
to
identify
all
contributing
factors
and
measure
the
significance
of
each,
before
pushing
for
productive
change.
In
an
attempt
to
spread
awareness
of
these
factors,
I've
attached
links
to
articles,
as
well
as
quotes
and
some
personal
inferences
below.
What
follows
is
by
no
means
a
comprehensive
analysis,
but
rather
a
starting
point
from
which
one
may
begin
to
assess
the
problems
wildlife
face
in
Africa.
It
is
my
hope
that
you
will
spend
the
time
to
read
the
cited
articles,
formulate
your
own
opinions
on
the
issues
they
present,
and
make
educated
efforts
to
help
restore
the
amazing
habitats
and
wildlife
populations
of
Africa.
THE POPULATION PROBLEM:
When
President
Theodore
Roosevelt
came
to
east
Africa
in
1909
an
estimated
300,000
rhinos
roamed
the
region,
now
there
are
perhaps
2,000.1
Today
Black
Rhinos
are
critically
endangered
with
an
estimated
population
of
5,055,
while
White
Rhinos
have
recovered
from
near
extinction
to
an
estimated
population
of
20,405.2
There
may
have
been
as
many
as
3-5
million
African
elephants
in
the
early
part
of
the
20th
century,
but
today
there
are
an
estimated
470,000
to
600,000
African
elephants
in
the
wild.3
In
1975
there
were
an
estimated
250,000
lions
in
Africa,
yet
today
the
continent
wide
population
stands
at
a
mere
30,000
lions.
More
recently,
the
lion
population
is
inferred
to
have
undergone
a
reduction
of
approximately
42%
over
the
past
21
years
(approximately
three
lion
generations,
1993-
2014).4
http://www.economist.com/node/16941705
https://www.savetherhino.org/rhino_info/species_of_rhino/white_rhinos
3
http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/endangered_species/elephants/african_elephants/
4
http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/15951/0
1
2
Page 1
5
6
Page 2
While
Africas
population
density
is
low
relative
to
other
continents,
Africas
fertility
rates
are
staggeringly
high.
Throughout
the
world
the
total
number
of
births
per
woman
is
declining;
according
to
the
UN,
Since
1970-1975
world
total
fertility
has
declined
by
37
percent:
from
4.5
births
per
woman
to
the
1995-2000
level
of
2.8.7
While
the
worlds
replacement
rate
is
dropping,
Africas
total
fertility
rates
(TFRs)
remain
the
highest
in
the
world;
in
2014
the
CIA
World
Factbook
listed
40
of
Africas
54
countries
with
TFRs
of
4+
births
per
woman.
What
do
these
TFRs
mean
for
the
future
of
Africa?
In
the
next
35
years
UNICEF
estimates
1.8
billion
births.
By
2050,
one
out
of
every
three
children
born
in
the
world
will
be
an
African,
and
Africa
will
have
almost
1
billion
children
under
age
18
making
up
40%
of
children
worldwide.
The
TFRs
also
indicate
Africas
demand
for
natural
resources,
poverty,
and
loss
of
wildlife
habitat
will
increase.
United
Nations:
Fertility
Levels
and
Trends
in
Countries
With
Intermediate
Levels
of
Fertility
(2001)
http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/events/pdf/expert/4/population-fertilitylevels.pdf
7
Page 3
3. HABITAT LOSS
Loss of Habitat and Natural Prey
https://lionalert.org/page/loss-of-habitat-and-natural-prey
Expanding
human
populations
have
appropriated
land
that
used
to
be
available
to
wildlife.
Such
land
was
either
converted
to
another
land
use
that
was:
more
economically
viable,
not
protected
for
wildlife
in
any
way,
minimally
protected,
lost
effective
protection
status
by
lack
of
enforcement,
or
was
abandoned
by
wildlife
authorities
unable
to
operate
during
times
of
civil
strife
or
other
factor
leading
to
a
lack
of
resources.
The
lions
prey
species
are
also
attractive
for
human
consumption,
and
utilization
of
game
species
is
rife
throughout
Africa.
Such
utilization
is
largely
illegal,
but
has
assumed
commercial
proportions;
whilst
prosecution
is
practically
non-existent.
As
habitat
is
lost
lion
populations
are
becoming
increasingly
fragmented
within
insular
reserves
closed
to
natural
immigration.
Whereas
previously
natural
re-colonization
had
been
possible
the
opportunities
for
such
events
today
are
greatly
reduced
or
non-existent.
This
trend
increasingly
applies
even
within
countries
with
previously
substantial
lion
populations
outside
protected
areas.
Natural
re-colonization
increasingly
requires
emigration
from
an
occupied
area
through
an
inhospitable
habitat
matrix.
Kenya,
Tanzania,
Botswana,
Mozambique
and
possibly
other
lion
range
states
still
maintain
many
lion
populations
living
outside
strictly
protected
areas.
As
individual
lions
in
protected
areas
naturally
disperse,
such
movements
often
mean
those
lions
move
into
surrounding
areas
that
have
no
connectivity
to
other
habitat
patches
and/or
into
marginally
suitable
habitat,
bringing
them
into
conflict
with
human
populations
in
those
areas.
In
reality,
local
communities
are
often
against
the
maintenance
of
any
predator
or
other
species
that
threatens
human
lives
and
livestock,
crops
and
agriculture.
Page 4
Page 5
In
the
area
around
the
Kakum
National
Park
in
Ghana,
approximately
80
to
90
percent
of
crop-
raiding
is
attributed
to
elephants
(Osborn
and
Parker,
2002).
Every
year
the
500
households
living
close
to
the
Kakum
Conservation
Area
lose
about
70
percent
of
their
food
crops
to
elephant
raids
alone
(Barnes
et
al.,
2003).
ATTACKS
ON
DOMESTIC
ANIMALS
Another
adverse
effect
of
the
human-wildlife
conflict
is
the
killing
of
domestic
animals
by
predators.
The
number
and
type
of
domestic
animals
killed
by
wildlife
varies
according
to
the
species,
the
time
of
year,
and
the
availability
of
natural
prey.
In
the
savannah
and
grasslands
where
pastoralism
remains
the
main
source
of
livelihood
for
many
people,
attacks
on
livestock
are
an
issue.
On
a
national
level
the
losses
are
hardly
significant,
but
for
the
individual
stock
owner,
they
can
be
catastrophic.
For
a
small-scale
herder,
losses
to
wildlife
can
mean
the
difference
between
economic
independence
and
dire
poverty.8
TRANSMISSION
OF
DISEASE
TO
LIVESTOCK
AND/OR
HUMANS
Serious
diseases
are
known
to
be
transmitted
by
wildlife
to
domestic
livestock
and
possibly
also
to
humans
(i.e.
rabies).
Scavengers
and
predators,
such
as
spotted
hyenas,
jackals,
lions
and
vultures,
also
play
a
role
in
disseminating
pathogens
by
opening
up,
dismembering
and
dispersing
parts
of
infected
carcasses.
For
example,
predators
ingest
anthrax
spores
together
with
carcass
tissue;
the
spores
are
then
widely
disseminated
in
the
predators
faeces
(Hugh-Jones
and
de
Vos,
2002).
LONG
TERM:
CONSERVATION
OF
WILDLIFE
Human-induced
wildlife
mortality
not
only
affects
the
population
viability
of
some
of
the
most
endangered
species,
but
also
has
a
broader
environmental
impact
on
ecosystem
equilibrium
and
biodiversity
preservation.
Conflict
between
people
and
wildlife
today
undoubtedly
ranks
among
the
main
threats
to
conservation
in
Africa
alongside
habitat
destruction
and
commercially
motivated
hunting
of
wildlife
to
satisfy
the
demand
for
bushmeat
and
represents
a
real
challenge
to
local,
national
and
regional
governments,
wildlife
managers,
conservation
and
development
agencies,
and
local
communities
(Kangwana,
1993;
Conover,
2002;
Treves
and
Karanth,
2003).
Conservation
of
wildlife
outside
protected
areas
cannot
be
achieved
merely
by
protecting
animals
and
avoiding
the
issues
of
peoples
needs
and
rights
and
their
conflict
with
wildlife.
Human-wildlife
conflict,
rural
poverty
and
hunger,
the
prohibitive
costs
of
wildlife
law-enforcement
arising
from
land
use
practices;
all
severely
limit
wildlife
conservation
outside
Africas
national
parks.
Page 6
reduction
in
profitability
would
be
much
lower
than
if
lion
hunting
was
stopped
altogether
(7,005
km2).
We
recommend
that
interventions
focus
on
reducing
off-takes
to
sustainable
levels,
implementing
age-based
regulations
and
improving
governance
of
trophy
hunting.
Such
measures
could
ensure
sustainability,
while
retaining
incentives
for
the
conservation
of
lions
and
their
habitat
from
hunting.
Trophy hunting just part of the story behind declining lion numbers in Africa
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/29/trophy-hunting-just-part-story-behinddeclining-lion-numbers-africa
Lions
are
grossly
over-hunted
in
Zimbabwe
concessions,
lured
out
of
national
parks
and
there
is
corruption.
Quotas
are
exceeded.
It
is
highly
unsustainable,
said
a
spokesman
for
Lion
Aid,
following
the
illegal
killing
of
a
12-year-old
lion
known
as
Cecil
who
was
lured
out
of
Hwange
national
park
by
an
American
hunter.
But
many
conservationists
say
that
without
trophy
hunting
there
would
be
no
lions
at
all.
The
land
would
be
used
for
farming
and
this
would
accelerate
the
loss
of
wildlife.
We
dont
like
trophy
hunting
but
it
slows
the
rapid
decline
of
populations.
It
is
a
necessary
evil,
said
Guy
Balme,
director
of
the
leopard
programme
in
Africa
for
US-based
conservation
group
Panthera.
Governments
encourage
hunting
because
most
of
the
land
used
for
hunting
is
not
suitable
for
tourism.
The
problem
is
we
dont
have
the
alternatives
to
hunting.
In
many
areas
where
lion
hunting
takes
place
there
is
no
other
wildlife-based
industry.
I
dont
condone
it.
The
shooting
industry
uses
the
excuse
that
hunting
is
better
than
the
alternatives,
but
it
can
only
be
a
short-term
solution,
said
Balme.
https://beta.healthyplanet.org/about/news/blog/item/751-55the-fight-against-wildlife-poaching-in-africa
http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/15/myths-more-tha-traditional-medicine-driving-rhino-slaughter/?_r=0
11
http://www.newsweek.com/2014/11/07/extinctcom-280884.html
12
http://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/illegal-wildlife-trade
9
10
Page 7
SOLUTION
Recognize
the
problem
exists
and
spread
awareness.
Correct
medicinal
myths
about
rhino
horns,
tiger
bones,
ect.
Take
action
against
both
sides
of
the
illegal
trafficking
supply
chain.
Stop
Internet
marketplaces
for
illegally
killed
wildlife.
Educate
local
inhabitants,
and
ensure
they
receive
material
advantages
from
the
game.
Enlarge
and
link
existing
protected
areas
and
control
commercial
poaching
by
developing
cooperative
relationships
with
adjacent
communities.
13
14
http://africanlions.wikispaces.com/Human+Poaching+of+the+Savannah+Mammals
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140108-west-african-lions-endangered-conservation-science/
Page 8
Economic
and
land
tenure
policy
reform.
Such
reforms
can
greatly
assist
in
reducing
external
environmental
pressures
on
protected
areas,
particularly
external
market
forces
and
in-migration.
For
example,
the
international
ban
on
ivory
trading
has
significantly
reduced
elephant
poaching
throughout
Africa.
Landscape-wide
conservation
planning.
Given
that
most
protected
areas
in
Africa
are
small
and
that
many
are
becoming
ecologically
isolated,
it
is
important
that
land-use
activities
that
are
compatible
with
wildlife
conservation
be
encouraged
on
a
landscape-wide
scale
adjacent
to
protected
areas,
and
activities
that
are
incompatible
must
be
actively
discouraged.
Conflict
resolution.
Promoting
dialogue
between
managers
of
protected
areas
and
local
communities,
involving
affected
stakeholders
in
protected-area
project
planning
and
implementation,
identifying
areas
of
common
interest
between
protected
areas
and
local
communities,
and
including
community
representatives
on
advisory
management
boards
for
protected
areas
can
greatly
assist
in
reducing
conflicts
between
parks
and
local
people
(Hough
1988,
Lewis
1996).
Community-Based
Natural
Resources
Management
(CBNRM).
Considerable
success
in
generating
compatible
land-use
regimes
around
protected
areas
has
been
claimed
in
Zambia,
Zimbabwe,
and
Namibia
through
the
use
of
CBNRM
approaches,
the
most
notable
of
which
is
the
CAMPFIRE
program
(Murphree
1993,
Metcalfe
1994).
Enhancing
the
management
capacity
of
protected-area
institutions.
The
capacity
of
most
African
protected-area
institutions
to
address
complex
interactions
between
protected
areas
and
local
communities
is
limited
(Hough
1994a,
1994b).
The
development
of
scholarships,
courses,
exchange
programs,
training
manuals,
and
technical
assistance
that
focus
on
ecological
and
social
monitoring,
conflict
resolution,
park
planning,
and
modern
law
enforcement
techniques
would
greatly
enhance
the
capacity
of
protected-area
institutions
to
address
many
of
the
protected-arealocal
community
conflicts.
Page 9