Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
by: dr_warlock
Disclaimer: The information and materials written and provided in this ebook are for informational purposes
only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with
respect to any particular issue or problem.
Introduction
There are many things in life that we often don't question. Not out of fear, but because the thought never crosses
our minds. Things that have been around in society for thousands of years, or ever since you could remember.
Your parents did it, your peers do it, the media romanticizes it, people talk about it all the time with great
anticipation, you are told about it from k-12 and your four years as an undergrad. It's a constant. It's just what
you do. It just is... Why bother analyzing it? This is normal. This is natural. If it doesn't work out, it's not the
activity that's the problem, it's that you must have gone about it wrong. To bother questioning it would be a
waste of time because there's nothing to answer.
I come to tell you that marriage is one of those things. We've all heard it before. You get good grades in high
school so you can attend a prestigious college. Then you graduate and look for a steady job as an employee at a
company. Next, you find a woman to settle down with, buy a 3 month's salary's worth diamond engagement
ring and propose. After that, you purchase a home in the suburbs signed with both of your names and move in
together. You buy a vehicle for each of you, making sure one of them can fit the kids-to-come easily. Finally,
you purchase a wedding ring, get married, and have children. The cycle repeats.
All the topics covered from the Red Pill can be derived from one simple philosophy, "I come first"-- What's in it
for me? How do I benefit from this particular action? Will I get a return on my investment of time, energy, and
effort? Do I feel like doing this now? Will it bring happiness into my life? Will it improve my circumstances? If
I do this, can I retain my self-respect? Me, me, me, me, me. The goal of this e-book is to have you questioning
the status quo.
It is mainly for these reasons that daughters were extra weight. You may be willing to support them to the very
end, you may love and cherish them more than anything in the world, but the fact remains, they require a lot of
coddling, extra energy, and protection from the outside world to keep them safe and emotionally stable. If you
can't hold frame or command respect, good luck. When it is time for her to leave the nest, it puts the mind at
ease to delegate the task of provisioning to another self-reliant male that you approve of. Even today, with all of
our comforts and social structures that aid with this issue, father's and brothers should know what I'm talking
about. What brother or father wouldn't prefer their sisters and daughters to marry
The Why
As the head of the household and breadwinner, it is the father's job to ensure that his children leave the nest and
possess the means to survive. How does a father ensure his daughter survives the pre-Industrial Revolution
environment? He makes sure, in order of descending importance, that the richest, strongest, most good looking
male interested in his daughter is legally bounded to support her and the resulting kids for the rest of his life and
leave his estate for his spouse after death. No poor fucks.
Marriage was not practiced out of love, but to provide a stable home environment for a family. Much of that
was making sure daughters were cared for. It's what forged families into big support networks. The idea was
that if you promise to take care of my daughter and create a legacy, you may have her. I will pay for the
wedding, and provide cash if need be until my last breath.
Conclusion
This is a great deal for a woman. But for a male? That depends. Society is not what is was; women's priorities
have changed. Can a marriage be successful? Yes. Can it bring value into your life? Yes. But do you have what
it takes to make this calculated risk? Should you take it?
Though much of the purpose was for daughters, both genders gained and lost from this practice. How did males
acquire enough benefit from marriage to participate? The answer lies in the exclusive, legal rights given to
husbands of Marriage 1.0.
Sole Custody: It makes sense. Father's were the breadwinners. In exchange for the lifetime burden of
provisioning, he's granted exclusive rights over the children. If a woman decides to leave, she can't take
them and request child support.
Property: Again, fathers were the breadwinners. Using basic logic, any property purchased by another
family member had to come from the father's labor. Even monetary gifts, such as allowance, are subject
to seizure. This treated women like children; any belongings of a children can be taken. It is the same as
saying what's yours is mine, but you can use it.
Restrictive-Divorce: A woman couldn't leave and request previous-lifestyle-income-percentage based
alimony every month because she's not haaaaaaaaaaapy or decides to branch-swing.
Impotence-Divorce: Marriage was sought to create families in a stable home environment. So if one
partner is infertile, the legal union has little purpose for those who want children other than provisioning
for the wife. If the wife's uterus is broken, the husband could switch out for another one.
Adultery-Divorce: This was taken very seriously. If you were cuckolded, the bitch doesn't get shit.
Here's an essay about the extreme measures and efforts civilians, church leaders, and the government
took to prevent and punish fornication(pre-marital sex) and marital infidelity, History of Fornication and
Adultery Criminal Laws.
No Women's Suffrage: They didn't have the ability to use their ~50% and their legion of beta/mangina
orbiters that were desperate to please and create legal/social pussy passes and revoke agency such as the
following: "Hawaii Has Adopted Yes Means Yes"(My Article), "Violence Against Women Act"
(Encourages the prohibition of polygraphs for rape victims AKA "victim blaming" on Page 2),
"Affirmative Action", "Ontario Health and Physical Curriculum"(The excessive coddling of children,
teaching sex before kids can read and write, and feminist indoctrination on impressionable minds),
Gender Quotas, and many other things. Men knew the fickle nature of women's feelings. They could use
their political power to avoid this.
Analysis
Individually, these laws don't amount to much. But together, they give a husband great power over his family
and household. Remember, love goes down (Men -- > Women -- > Children), respect goes up (Children -- >
Women --> Men). There wasn't the equality-of-the-genders nonsense in society until around the 1960's. The
poisonous thoughts of equality weren't swimming in the minds of women, helping allow her to look up to her
man, the way she desires, in the relationship hierarchy. This legal authority, financial control, previous social
ideology, and prevention of illogical political action helps satisfy the psychological need for his wife and
children to respect him, the hand that feeds them.
Conclusion:
There were both pros and cons of Marriage 1.0. The husband had most of the power, but burdened with most of
the responsibilities. The wife had little power, but had guaranteed provisioning. And both spouses had little
wiggle room for escape. This isn't a cheer for Marriage 1.0, its to help contrast the current state of affairs. As
you are aware of, there have been radical changes to the environment, social ideology, medicine, and legal
system since this time period. Next, I'll tell you the first 'event' that caused Marriage 1.0 to evolve into Marriage
2.0, the reason why inter-gender dynamics has shifted so drastically on a global scale, and how it morphed the
workings of marriage.
Conclusion
The fact that women's rights increased so dramatically in the early 1800's is by no means a coincidence. Like a
binary explosive, the intersection of the natural cycles of empires and the Industrial Revolution reacted
violently. Women were never granted equality out of the kindness of men's hearts. It was because titans of
industry had to give them a sense of autonomy in order for women to persist working for their slave wages and
increase profit margins and politicians wanted to keep their status. Marriage 1.0 is gone, but what will it evolve
into? How does society change as a result of women's ability to influence politics? What direction do laws take?
Most importantly, what the fuck does this long-ass history lesson have to do with getting married? Don't worry
I'll get to that. In the next chapter, I'll go over how men allowed women to "defy" nature, and its consequences.
like this one. Gradually, more women are entering the workforce, acquiring more money for themselves,
making the husband perceived to be less necessary.
The Artificial Shield
Remember Margaret Sanger's campaigns for women's right to birth control? All her efforts finally paid off
when in 1960, the BCP became approved by the FDA (Source). This was critical to the feminine imperative.
For the first time in history, a female could choose when to get pregnant, and who to do it with. Combine this
with the fact that many women can now support themselves, and you get the sexual revolution. Nature's barrier
to promiscuity, the female's inability to provide for herself, and pregnancy, has now been removed. The switch
has been flipped, the engine is started, and the cock carousel begins to spin.
Marriage 2.0 could have been managed, but the existence of betas ruins it for everyone. The sexual market
place has officially opened. This was the demise of Marriage 2.0. Prospective males could now compete against
one another for casual sex inevitably leaving many alpha widows in their wake. In fact, with just two nonmarital partners, the stability of the now marriage 3.0 drops to 53% (Source). The betas, the scrap scavengers,
the desperate lock hands, and form a safety net should Quarter-back Jack, Douchebag-Steve, and Chad
Thundercock toss her aside, or if she hits the wall. This was the final blow to society. In the past, females could
only go as far as what their uterus' allowed, but now, AF/BB is unleashed.
Conclusion
Women were able to work. Companies hired them because they could be paid less. To keep them workings,
women were allowed to own property. With this new power, they were motivated to take action because they
now had something to defend. When they were able to vote, birth control was fought for and won. The lifting of
nature's barrier to female promiscuity created the sexual market place. Not only do women lose their ability to
pair bond with each sex partner, they create an army of orbiters just waiting to get their turn. I will show just
how dangerous these betas really are.
Recommended Reading
Esther Vilar discusses why women, despite living in the most liberal countries in the world, and being more safe
and pampered than any other time in history, continue to attempt having themselves being viewed as victims in
her book, The Polygamous Sex. It's a fascinating short read you could finish in one sitting. Though very rare, I
managed to find it.
The Polygamous Sex Free PDF Download (41 pages): here
Reaching Out
September 9, 1973, two black prisoners founded the group, Prisoners Against Rape (P.A.R). Inmate on inmate,
guard on inmate, all sorts of rape going on in the prison systems was left unchecked. Out of desperateness, this
growing group was reaching out to other alleged victims in attempt to bring more attention to the issue, and
possibly get sympathy. Guess who they sought as an ally? Answer: Feminists. After all, they've been crying out
about rape and domestic violence for years, shouldn't they be perfect for the cause? Hahahahaha. Poor fucks.
They have no idea who they're dealing with.
Conclusion
Marriage is now considered a fall back plan. Secured by the beta safety nets, females are free to ride the cock
carousel until they fall off. Divorce laws allow them to branch swing whenever they want, and still get paid.
Because women are now more free and pampered than ever, they had to make up a narrative to maintain their
victimhood status. Betas, manginas, and whiteknights took the bait. Law by law, since 1975, the government
and society has removed agency from females. Females can now enter marriage without the expectation of sex.
You in marriage 3.0 now have little to keep a women interested other than perpetual dread game (Read
Briffault's Law). At anytime, your woman can wreak havoc on your life with false allegations because of the
lowered standard of evidence and one by one, your male spaces and every facet of life are being infiltrated with
SJW, politically correct retardation.
This is what happens when betas are allowed to enter the casual sex market. This is what happens when
spineless pussies wife up whores; constantly liking and commenting girls photos that skyrocket's women's ego
and expectations; accept infidelity, cuckolding, and unacceptable behavior; run errands at a female's whim; fight
to save a women who has no relation to them regardless of fault, and desperately wait for a chance to be in a
women's presence. These pathetic excuses of men that tremble at the thought of displeasing women, such fickle
weak creatures, have a vote that counts just as much as yours. Women only do what men allow them to do and
betas allow them to do anything; they weaponized their vote. These are the consequences...
Fault: You can deny accusation of fault, but these are the required reasons...
o Adultery
o Pregnancy of the wife at the time of marriage unkown to husband
o Desertion or abandonment (specified length of time depends on state)
o Abuse (physical, emotional or mental cruelty) or Cruel Treatment
o Incarceration (specified length of time depends on state)
o Insanity
o Impotence
o Substance abuse
o Infection with a sexually transmitted disease
o Marriage between people too closely related (in some states grounds for annulment)
No-Fault: Does not require any fault, and you cannot not deny it. "A spouse cannot object to another's
petition for no fault divorce, as that objection itself is viewed by the court as an irreconcilable
difference."
Separation: Living apart for legally set amount of time.
Important: Regardless of how the divorce is based or what she did, she is entitled "a fair and equitable"
share or HALF of everything you own possibly alimony.
(Source) [Cases of Fault]
(Source) [Fault vs. No-Fault (Text)]
(Source) [Video of Lawyer: Fault vs. No Fault]
California (Exception: "if your spouse is insane or mentally incompetent", needs doctor confirmation)
Colorado
Florida (Exception: "if your spouse is insane or mentally incompetent", needs doctor confirmation)
Hawaii
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
Oregon
Washington
Wisconsin
District of Columbia (D.C)
In the remaining 33 states, you can choose no-fault grounds if you desire.
(Source) [No-Fault States]
List of Separation-Divorce States
Definition: an agreement made by a couple before they marry concerning the ownership of their
respective assets should the marriage fail.
Requirements:
1) Must FULLY disclose all assets
2) Must be signed "well in advance"
3) Must be signed in good faith
4) There can be no fraud in the inducement to sign
Important: A judge can toss the whole contract aside if they believe any one of these requirements
aren't followed.
Marital Property: all income and assets acquired by either spouse during the marriage including, but
not limited to...
"Pension Plans; 401Ks, IRAs and other Retirement Plans; Deferred Compensation; Stock Options; Restricted
Stocks and other equity; Bonuses; Commissions; Country Club memberships; Annuities; Life Insurance
(especially those with cash values); Brokerage accounts mutual funds, stocks, bonds, etc; Bank Accounts
Checking, Savings, Christmas Club, CDs, etc; Closely-held businesses; Professional Practices and licenses;
Real Estate; Limited Partnerships; Cars, boats, etc; Art, antiques; Tax refunds." "In many states, if your
separately owned property increases in value during the marriage, that increase is also considered marital
property. However some states will differentiate between active and passive appreciation when deciding if an
increase in the value of separate property should be considered marital property."
Arizona
California
Idaho
Louisiana
Nevada
New Mexico
Texas
Washington
Wisconsin
(Source)
Alimony (Spousal Support)
Requirements for Receiving: "At one time, there was a third requirement; that of fault." (Source)
Historical Purpose (Marriage 1.0): "to punish the husband for leaving his wife without a good cause."
(Source)
Today's Reason: "Spousal support laws throughout the United States seek to prevent a divorced spouse
from suffering from a decrease in his or her [previous] standard of living". This includes excess
spending (e.g. vacations and shopping). (Source)
Is a company car considered when determining a spousal support award?: "Yes. Courts have held
that the use of a company car is considered income for the purposes of calculating spousal support. It is
viewed in this fashion because the court feels as though if one should opt not to have the company car
there would be an increase in salary. " (Source)
Must Give Money; Property Settlement Equivalents Don't Count: "Recent cases have held that just
because a dependent spouse can live comfortably off an equitable distribution award (a property
settlement) is no reason to deny spousal support. The size of the property settlement should not
determine the right to spousal support." (Source)
Unemployment or jail is sometimes not an excuse for not being able to pay alimony. (Source) Source 2.
Paternity Testing
France: Has outlawed private paternity testing because they want to "Preserve the peace of French
families". It can result in a year of prison, and 15,000 euro fine (Source) .
Germany: Private paternity tests are illegal if BOTH parents don't consent and can result in a fine of
5000 euros because, they are for "protecting the rights of patients' and preventing 'abuse of sensitive
personal data'" (Source)
United States: A man can conduct a private paternity test, but the evidence is not admissible in court.
All paternity tests must go through the approved labs of the American Association of Blood Banks
(AABB) FROM A COURT (Source) . A man is only entitled to a paternity test if intends to claim rights
towards the child.
o Presumed Father: If you are married, listed as the father on the birth certificate, co-sign a
parenthood declaration form or if the child is born within 300 days after the ended marriage
(Source).
o Time limit: Depending on the state you have 1-4 years to disprove paternity. Guess what? Since
a male has to get permission from the court and use the AABB approved labs, it can take longer
than the legal allotted time for you to rebut before you get the results back (Source).
o Warning: A paternity test results do not determine a case, it is only used as
RECOMMENDATION for child support hearings.
Child Support
Bradley Amendment (1986): It doesn't matter if you lost your job, it does not matter if you were
statutory raped by an older woman, it does not matter if you were a prisoner of war who's wife had a
child with another man, it does not matter if you were in a coma, and it does not matter if DNA proves 3
children from 3 different fathers aren't yours, once you are assigned child support by court order, it can
NEVER EVER be reduced. Not by a judge, not by bankruptcy court, not even if a mother remarries.
Only a mother can forgive debts owed. If you cannot pay, assets may be seized, or you may go to prison.
You will be charged more child support while behind bars and be asked pay again. If you can't pay upon
your release, you can be sent back to prison (Source).
o Alternatives for Enforcing Child Support: Including but not limited to, garnishing your wages,
take your tax returns, and seize your property and more... (Source)
Types of Legal Formulas that Determine Amount
o Incomes Shares Model: Based on percentage of both legal parents income.
o Percentage of Income Model: Based on the legal, non-custodial parent's income (You)
o Melson Formula: Income Share Model + Standard of Living (based on how child could live if
both parents were together
o Warning: The judge does not have to have to follow any state formulas. (Source) [Formulas]
Important: Mother doesn't have to prove it's being used on the child
CS Reform Effects on Society
o United States (Graph): Look at this graph, notice how in ~1960-1965, the single mother
households of the United States sky rocketed. Guess what happened in that time period?
FDA Approval of Birth Control (1960)
Social Security Act Amendment (1965): Allowed Welfare Services access to your
address and employment information for child support.
Social Security Act Amendment (1967): Made every state create a child support unit
o Australia (Graph): Look at this graph. Notice how in 1986, the number of single parent
households also sky rocketed. Guess what happened then? A law similar to the Bradley
Amendment (1986) was implemented.
The End