Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
of 1780
Economic Crisis
Origins in the Revolution:
shortage of goods resulting from the British Blockade
demand for supplies by the army and the militias
flood of paper currency resulting in inflation
U.S. dollar compared to the Spanish dollar. Most of the money ended
up in the hands of merchants. U.S. continued to be a supplier of raw
materials and an importer of manufactured products especially from
Great Britain. British merchants began a major trade with Americans.
Resulting in :
exportable goods reduced by fighting
trade deficit rose
Left the country with little sliver coin (currency) in circulation
State Remedies
Radicals called for regulation of the economy. Farmers and debtors pressed
for legal tender laws
would impose a paper currency at face value
seven states enacted such laws
the programs worked pretty well without problems originally feared by
creditors
Rhode Island
"To relieve the distressed"
1786 enacted radical currency law. The law declared the paper currency
legal tender to all debts
If creditors refused to accept a debt then the currency that would be used
to pay the debt can be given to a judge who can then declare the debt paid
State elected high tariff barriers to curb imports and protect domestic
industries
Annapolis Convention
Annapolis Convention
1786 Virginian legislature invited all states to
appoint delegates to a convention
Twelve delegates from five states attended
Passed a resolution requesting Confederation
Congress call on all states to send delegates to a
national convention that they might "render the
constitution of the federal government adequate
to the exigencies of the union"
Congress endorsed a Philadelphia convention to
be held in May 1787 to revise the Articles of
Confederation
Conservatives wanted to strengthen national
government
New Constitution
of the United
States
New Constitution
May 1787
55 men from 12 states (Rhode Island didn't
attend) met at Pennsylvania state house in
Philadelphia
Several prominent men were missing
(Thomas Jefferson and John Adams)
There were land speculators and merchants
also present
No minorities or women were present
The Constitution was basically framed by
white men who represented America's social
and economic elite (Patriots and Republicans)
A New Constitution
The Limits of Democracy
http://youtu.be/QQtJNK5_8Uk
New
Constitution
Only a few had humble origins most had been born into
prosperity families. Lawyers merchants, planters and
large farms. Average age was 42. At a time when fewer
than one-tenth of 1% of Americans attended college
more than half the delegates had college educations. 22
served in the army during the revolution. To ensure free
and candid debate the deliberations took place in
private.
A New Constitution
The Final Document
Authors of
the
Constitution
and Deism
What is Deism?
Only a few had humble origins most had been born into prosperity
families. Lawyers merchants, planters and large farms. Average
age was 42. At a time when fewer than one-tenth of 1% of
Americans attended college more than half the delegates had
college educations. 22 served in the army during the revolution.
To ensure free and candid debate the deliberations took place in
private.
A New Constitution
The Division and Separation of
Powers
Pennsylvanias constitution no
longer required ownership of
property but it retained the
taxpaying qualification but left a
small number mainly paupers
barred from voting
Bill of
Rights
A New Constitution
The Debate over Slavery
Slavery in the Constitution
First Federal
Governmen
t
Ware v. Hylton, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 199 (1796) is a United States Supreme Court case where a
divided court ruled that an article in the Treaty of Paris, which provided that creditors on both
sides should meet no lawful impediment when recovering bona fide debts, took precedence
and overruled a Virginia law passed during the American Revolution which had nullified such
debts. The full title of the case is Ware, administrator of Jones, Plaintiff in Error v. Hylton et al.
It is also known as the British Debt case.
"The treaty of peace concluded between the United States and Great Britain, in 1783,
enabled British creditors to recover debts previously owing to them by American citizens,
notwithstanding a payment into a state treasury, under a state law of sequestration. An
individual citizen of one state cannot set up the violation of a public treaty, by the other
contracting party, to avoid an obligation arising under such treaty; the power to declare a
treaty void, for such cause, rests solely with the government, which may, or may not,
exercise its option in the premises."[1] Justice Iredell delivered the controlling opinion of the
Court.
"Patrick Henry, John Marshall, Alexander Campbell, and James Innis appeared for the
American debtors, and Andrew Ronald, John Wickham 'the eloquent, the witty, and the
graceful,' and Starke, and Baker, for the English creditors."[2]
John Marshall's argument before the bar won him great admiration at the time of its delivery,
and enlarged the circle of his reputation.[3] Flanders also added the reader of Marshall's
argument "cannot fail to be impressed with the vigor, rigorous analysis, and close reasoning
that mark every sentence of it."
Oral argument in the case was reenacted at Mount Vernon in 2011, with U.S. Supreme Court
Associate Justice Samuel Alito presiding. Historic Mount Vernon and the U.S. Supreme Court
Historical Society cosponsored the event
Hamiltons
Fiscal
Policies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=notJu
FGXQ9w
President George Washington appointed Hamilton as the first United States Secretary o
the Treasury on September 11, 1789. He left office on the last day of January 1795.
Much of the structure of the government of the United States was worked out in those
five years, beginning with the structure and function of the cabinet itself. Forrest
McDonald argues that Hamilton saw his office, like that of the British First Lord of the
Treasury, as the equivalent of a Prime Minister; Hamilton would oversee his colleagues
under the elective reign of George Washington. Washington did request Hamilton's
advice and assistance on matters outside the purview of the Treasury Department.
In the next two years, Hamilton submitted five reports:
The Bank of
Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia was
designed by
Benjamin
Latrobe. .
Hamiltons
program was a
intended to give
the countrys
financial leaders a
stake in the
stability of the
federal government
Alexander
Hamiltons home
which was moved
out of New York
Maria Reynolds 23
had an affair with
the married
Alexander Hamilton
34. Although the
affair was kept
secret for awhile.
Thomas Jefferson
used this
information as
leverage on his
opponent Alexander
Hamilton
Affair
In 1791, 23-year-old Maria Reynolds approached the married 34year-old Alexander Hamilton in Philadelphia, requesting his help.
Claiming that James Reynolds had abandoned her and her
daughter, Maria asked him for enough money to transport them
back to New York City, where her family lived. Hamilton consented,
and delivered the money in person to Maria later that night. As
Hamilton himself later confessed, "I took the bill out of my pocket
and gave it to her Some conversation ensued from which it was
quickly apparent that other than pecuniary consolation would be
acceptable." The two began an illicit affair that would last at least
three years.
Over the course of 1791 and 1792 while the affair took place,
James Reynolds was well aware of his wife's unfaithfulness. He
continually supported the affair to regularly gain blackmail money
from Hamilton. The common practice in the day was for the
wronged husband to seek retribution in a pistol duel, but Reynolds,
realizing how much Hamilton had to lose if his activity came into
public view, again insisted on monetary compensation instead.
Scandal
Hamilton eventually paid Reynolds more than $1,000 in blackmail over several years to continue sleeping with
Maria without his interference. But when Reynolds, being a professional con man, became entangled in a
separate scheme involving speculation on unpaid back wages intended for Revolutionary War veterans, he used
his knowledge about Hamiltons sex affair to bargain his way out of his own troubles. Reynolds knew Hamilton
would have to choose between revealing his affair with Maria, or admitting complicity to the speculation charges.
Congressional investigators James Monroe and Frederick Muhlenberg were the first men to hear of this
incredible possible corruption within their new government system. Monroe and Muhlenberg had the option to go
straight to President Washington with this news, but as gentlemen they felt compelled to bring it to Hamilton first.
Hamilton chose the former course, admitting his sexual indiscretion to Monroe and Muhlenberg, and even turning
over his love letters from Maria to them.
The letters proved Hamilton's innocence in the speculation scandal. In addition, because his confession was
made in confidence, Hamilton's involvement with Maria Reynolds was not made public in the wake of the
speculation investigation. Monroe and his colleagues assured Hamilton that the matter was settled. However,
Monroe took the love letters and sent them to his close personal friend, Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson and
Hamilton were self-described nemeses, and five years after receiving the letters, Jefferson used the knowledge to
start rampant rumors about Hamilton's private life. The final straw came in 1797, when pamphlet publisher James
Callender obtained the secret letters and printed them in his newspaper. Callender also revived the corruption
charges against Hamilton. Hamilton responded by printing his own 95 page pamphlet called Observations on
Certain Documents in which he denied all charges of corruption. He did not, however, deny his relationship with
Maria Reynolds; instead, he openly admitted it and apologized for it.
Politics
in an Age of Passion
The Emergence of Opposition
The Jefferson-Hamilton Bargain
American
Foreign
Policy
The Citizen Gent affair began in 1793 when he was dispatched to the United States to promote
American support for France's wars with Spain and Britain.
Gent arrived in Charleston, South Carolina on the warship Embuscade on April 8. Instead of
traveling to the then-capital of Philadelphia to present himself to U.S. President George Washington
for accreditation, Gent stayed in South Carolina. There he was greeted with enthusiasm by the
people of Charleston, who threw a string of parties in his honor.
Gent's goals in South Carolina were to recruit and arm American privateers who would join French
expeditions against the British. He commissioned four privateering ships in total, including the
Republicaine, the Anti-George, the Sans-Culotte, and the Citizen Gent. Working with French consul
Michel Ange Bernard Mangourit, Gent organized American volunteers to fight Britain's Spanish
allies in Florida. After raising a militia, Gent set sail toward Philadelphia, stopping along the way to
marshal support for the French cause and arriving on May 18. He encouraged DemocraticRepublican Societies, but President Washington denounced them and they quickly withered away.
His actions endangered American neutrality in the war between France and Britain, which
Washington had pointedly declared in his Neutrality Proclamation of April 22. When Gent met with
Washington, he asked for what amounted to a suspension of American neutrality. When turned
down by Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson and informed that his actions were unacceptable,
Gent protested. Meanwhile, Gent's privateers were capturing British ships, and his militia was
preparing to move against the Spanish.
Gent continued to defy the wishes of the United States government, capturing British ships and
rearming them as privateers. Washington sent Gent an 8,000-word letter of complaint on
Jefferson's and Hamilton's advice one of the few situations in which the Federalist Alexander
Hamilton and the Democratic-Republican Jefferson agreed. Gent replied obstinately.
The Jacobins, having taken power in France by January 1794, sent an arrest notice which asked
Gent to come back to France. Gent, knowing that he would likely be sent to the guillotine, asked
Washington for asylum. It was Hamilton Gent's fiercest opponent in the cabinet who convinced
Genets arrived in Charleston, South Carolina on the warship Embuscade on April 8. Instead of
traveling to the then-capital of Philadelphia to present himself to U.S. President George
Washington for accreditation, Gent stayed in South Carolina. There he was greeted with
enthusiasm by the people of Charleston, who threw a string of parties in his honor.
Gent's goals in South Carolina were to recruit and arm American privateers who would join
French expeditions against the British. He commissioned four privateering ships in total,
including the Republicaine, the Anti-George, the Sans-Culotte, and the Citizen Gent. Working
with French consul Michel Ange Bernard Mangourit, Gent organized American volunteers to
fight Britain's Spanish allies in Florida. After raising a militia, Gent set sail toward
Philadelphia, stopping along the way to marshal support for the French cause and arriving on
May 18. He encouraged Democratic-Republican Societies, but President Washington
denounced them and they quickly withered away.
His actions endangered American neutrality in the war between France and Britain, which
Washington had pointedly declared in his Neutrality Proclamation of April 22. When Gent
met with Washington, he asked for what amounted to a suspension of American neutrality.
When turned down by Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson and informed that his actions were
unacceptable, Gent protested. Meanwhile, Gent's privateers were capturing British ships,
and his militia was preparing to move against the Spanish.
Gent continued to defy the wishes of the United States government, capturing British ships
and rearming them as privateers. Washington sent Gent an 8,000-word letter of complaint
on Jefferson's and Hamilton's advice one of the few situations in which the Federalist
Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republican Jefferson agreed. Gent replied
obstinately.
The Jacobins, having taken power in France by January 1794, sent an arrest notice which
asked Gent to come back to France. Gent, knowing that he would likely be sent to the
guillotine, asked Washington for asylum. It was Hamilton Gent's fiercest opponent in the
Jays Treaty
was
unpopular
with the
AntiFederalist
and
opposition
to Hamilton
Domestic
Policy of
America
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lxF0HAhs8
The United
States and
the Indian
People
Spanish
Florida
and
British
Canada
The
Crisis of
1794
Washington Farewell
Federalist and
Anti-Federalist
The Rise
of
Political
Parties
FEDERALISTS AND
JEFFERSONIAN REPUBLICANS
The Rise of Political Parties
The election of 1796 established two primary
political factions
Federalists (Federalism belief is a shared
government)
Republicans (belief in limited government)
The two political factions had an important role in
the presidential elections of 1796
Partisan organization was strongest in the Middle
states while political forces were weak in New
England and the South
There was no party discipline (the new
administration was divided)
FED #10=This essay, the first of Madison's contributions to the series, was a
rather long development of the theme that a well-constructed union would break
and control the violence of faction, a "dangerous vice" in popular governments.
As defined by Madison, a faction was a number of citizens, whether a majority
or minority, who were united and activated "by some common impulse of passion, or
of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and
aggregate interests of the community."
There were two ways of removing the causes of factions, or political parties. The
first was to destroy the liberty essential to their existence. This remedy would be
worse than the disease. The second was to give everyone the same opinions,
passions, and interests. This was impossible. Woven into the fabric of all societies,
deeply planted in the very nature of man, were conflicting ideas, interests, and
passions. The greatest source of factions had always been the various and unequal
distribution of property, said Madison:
Those who hold, and those who are without property, have ever formed distinct
interests in society. Those who are creditors, and those who are debtors, . . . a
landed interest, a manufacturing interest, a mercantile interest, a monied interest,
with many lesser interests, grow up of necessity in civilized nations, and divide them
into different classes, actuated by different sentiments and views. The regulation of
these various and interfering interests forms the principal task of modern
Legislation.
The inference to which we are brought, is, that the causes of faction
cannot be removed; and that relief is only to be sought in the means of
controlling its effects.
Such effects could be better controlled in a large society under a
representative form of government than in a small society under a popular
form of government. The proposed constitution would check the power of
factions by balancing one against the other. Factious leaders might "kindle a
flame" in one state, but would be unable to spread a general conflagration
throughout the states.
"A rage for paper money, for abolition of debts, for an equal division of
property, or for any other improper or wicked project, . . ." was not likely to
spread if those professing themselves republicans showed zeal in "supporting
the character of Federalists."
Analysis
Madison's definition of a "faction," or political party, is interesting and
most significant in view of the fact that Madison soon ceased to be one of the
Federalists who believed in a one-party system, and became Jefferson's most
active lieutenant in organizing in opposition the Democratic-Republican Party,
which was strongly Anti-Federalist and took power after 1800.
In 1788, power over people was divided both through federalism (between
the federal government and the state governments) and through branches
(legislative, executive, and judicial) within the national (or federal)
government. Because of the division of power, a "double security arises to
the rights of the people. The governments will control each other, at the
same time that each will be controlled by itself"[4].
Factions
Madison discusses at great length at the end the issue of political factions.
He recognizes that factions will always be present and that the only way to
counteract the effects of factions is to have numerous factions. In other
words, even if individuals mingle with other members of the same social
groups, ideals, and goals, no particular group should be able to become so
strong as to thwart the interest of all other groups.
Anti-Federalists:
The leading opponents from the major
states included Thomas Jefferson John
Hancock,
Patrick Henry, George Mason, and
Richard Henry Lee from
Virginia, George Clinton, Robert Yates,
and Melanesian Smith
from New York, John Winthrop' and El
bridge Gerry from
Massachusetts and Robert Whitehall,
William Findley, and John
Smilier from Pennsylvania.
Anti-Federalist repudiated
Madisons arguments in
Federalist number 10 and
51. anti-Federalist insisted
that a very extensive
territory cannot be governed
on the principles of freedom.
Popular self government
flourish best in small
communities where rulers
and ruled interacted daily.
Only men of wealth ignorant
of the sentiments of middling
and lower class of citizen
would have the resources to
1796 Election
Adams
Federalist
versus
Jefferson
The
Adams
Presidenc
y
French suspended relations with the U.S. after the Jay treaty
XYZ Affair
XYZ Affair
Aliens and
Seditions Act
Pennsylvanias constitution no
longer required ownership of
property but it retained the
taxpaying qualification but left a
small number mainly paupers
barred from voting
Lyon had the distinction of being the first member to have an ethics violation charge filed
against him when he was accused of "gross indecency" for spitting in Roger Griswold's face.
Griswold, a Congressman from Connecticut, had insulted Lyon, calling him a scoundrel, which
at the time was considered profanity. On January 30, 1798. Congress planned to have a
meeting to remove William Blount, of Tennessee, from office. Griswold was trying to attract
Lyon's attention, but Lyon was ignoring him on purpose, since they belonged to opposing
political parties (Lyon was a Democratic-Republican and Griswold a Federalist). Griswold
finally lost his temper and insulted Lyon. Their clash began when Lyon began a Congressional
discussion by declaring himself willing to fight for the interest of the common man. Mockingly,
Congressman Griswold asked if Lyon would be fighting with his wooden sword, a reference to
Lyon's dismissal from Gates' command during the Revolution. Furious, Lyon spat on the
Congressman, earning himself the nickname "The Spitting Lyon". On February 15, 1798,
Griswold retaliated by beating Lyon about the head with a wooden cane in view of other
representatives on the Senate floor. Lyon retreated to a fire pit and defended himself with the
tongs until other Congressmen broke up the fight.[6] Griswold had to be pulled by his legs to
urge him to let go of Lyon.[7] Although the Ethics Committee recommended censure, the
House as a whole rejected the motion to censure him.[8] Having married the daughter of
Governor Chittenden, it is possible Lyon had too much influence to have been removed;[9]
though others argue it was because any actions taken against Lyon would have to be pursued
against Griswold.[10]
Lyon also has the distinction of being the only person to be elected to Congress while in jail.
On October 10, 1798, Lyon was found guilty of sedition, in violation of the Alien and Sedition
Acts; which prohibited malicious writing of the American government as a whole, or of the
houses of Congress, or of the President. Lyon was the first person to be put to trial for violating
the acts on charges of criticizing Federalist president John Adams for his pretense of going to
war against France.
Election of
1800
Commerce
was much
apart of
the
freedoms
the New
country
presented
Fenno was born in Boston, the son of Ephraim Fenno, leather-dresser and alehouse keeper, and
Mary Chapman. He wed Mary Curtis, of Roxbury, Massachusetts, on May 8, 1777, and the couple
had thirteen children. Fenno spent some early years as a teacher, and was secretary to General
Artemas Ward during part of the American Revolution. Failure of an import business led to a
move to New York City, which at that time was the nation's capital. Having previously written for
the Massachusetts Centinel, Fenno on April 11, 1789 in New York City published the first issue of
the Gazette of the United States to support Federalist Party positions. Fenno moved it to
Philadelphia when the national capital moved there in 1790.
As opposing factions, centered around Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, developed
within President Washington's administration, political newspapers such as the Gazette became
increasingly important. Fenno's little three-column folio, printed on a sheet seventeen by twentyone inches, became the semi-official government newspaper, with a share of the government's
printing and with contributions from prominent Federalists such as John Adams. Hamilton was
especially active, writing articles under various pseudonyms and rescuing the editor from
bankruptcy in 1793 by raising $2,000 to pay off creditors.
Jefferson and his colleagues, angry at Fenno's attempt "to make way for a king, lords, and
Commons" set up rival newspapers, the Aurora edited by Benjamin F. Bache and the National
Gazette edited by Philip Freneau, to promote the newly formed Democratic-Republican Party. As
a highly visible Federalist spokesman, Fenno was engaged in verbal disputes that once led to
fisticuffs with Bache. The tone of the Gazette of the United States was somewhat above the
average of its contemporaries, and the Federalists were well served through its columns,
although the circulation never exceeded 1,400. Copies circulated to major cities where other
Federalist newspapers freely copied the news and editorials.
Fenno, along with his wife and a newborn daughter, died in Philadelphia during the yellow fever
epidemic of 1798. His son, John Ward Fenno, carried on with the paper until 1800, when he sold
it.
The Rising
Glory of
America
Books Books
Books
There were 92
newspapers in the
United States in 1787
only 12 published a
significant number of
Ant-Federalist pieces.
Madison gained
support for the
constitution by
bargaining with
Thomas Jefferson with
agreeing to a Bill of
Rights at the end of
the Constitution
John Filson was born in Chester County, Pennsylvania, around 1747. He was the son of Davison
Filson, also of Chester County. He attended the West Nottingham Academy in Colora, Maryland,
and studied with the Reverend Samuel Finley, afterwards president of the College of New Jersey
(later Princeton). Heitman's Historical Register of Colonial Officers reports a John Filson served
as an Ensign in Montgomery's Pennsylvania Battalion of the Flying Camp and was taken
prisoner at Fort Washington on 16 November 1776, during the Battle of New York.
He worked as a schoolteacher and surveyor in Pennsylvania until 1782 or 1783, when he
acquired over 13,000 acres (53 km) of western lands and moved to Kentucky. He settled in
Lexington, taught school, surveyed land claims, and travelled the region interviewing the
settlers and leading citizens. He wrote The Discovery, Settlement and Present State of Kentucke
during this period, and travelled to Wilmington, Delaware, to have it published in the summer of
1784. He also had a "Map of Kentucke" engraved and printed in Philadelphia. The edition,
including both book and map, consisted of 1,500 copies and was priced at $1.50. The map was
reprinted several times before 1793. Filson's plan for a second edition, to be endorsed by
George Washington, fell through.
The book was almost immediately translated into French and re-published in Paris (1785) and
somewhat later a German edition appeared (Leipzig, 1790). The appendix relating the
adventures of Daniel Boone was extremely popular, and was reference.
Women in
the
Intellectual
Scene