Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Notices 10639

these proposed directives would a substantial number of small entities under section 202 of the act is not
include appropriate site-specific pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility required.
environmental analysis and public Act because the directives would not
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the
involvement. The proposed directives impose recordkeeping requirements on
Public
would have no effect on the ground them; would not affect their competitive
until designations of roads, trails, and position in relation to large entities; and These proposed directives do not
areas are completed at the field level, would not affect their cash flow, contain any recordkeeping or reporting
with opportunity for public liquidity, or ability to remain in the requirements or other information
involvement. Section 31b of Forest market. collection requirements as defined in 5
Service Handbook 1909.15 (57 FR CFR part 1320 that are not already
43180, September 18, 1992) excludes No Takings Implications required by law or not already approved
from documentation in an These proposed directives have been for use. Accordingly, the review
environmental assessment or analyzed in accordance with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
environmental impact statement ‘‘rules, principles and criteria contained in E.O. Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and
regulations, or policies to establish 12630. It has been determined that these its implementing regulations at 5 CFR
Service-wide administrative procedures, directives would not pose the risk of a part 1320 do not apply.
program processes, or instructions.’’ The taking of private property. Therefore, for the reasons set out in
agency’s conclusion is that these this notice, the Forest Service proposes
proposed directives fall within this Federalism and Consultation and to amend FSM 2350, 7700, and 7710
category of actions and that no Coordination With Indian Tribal and FSH 7709.55. The proposed
extraordinary circumstances exist which Governments directives are available for review on the
would require preparation of an The agency has considered these Forest Service Web site at http://
environmental assessment or proposed directives under the www.fs.fed.us/recreation/programs/ohv.
environmental impact statement. requirements of E.O. 13132 on Dated: February 15, 2007.
Regulatory Impact federalism, and has determined that the Abigail R. Kimball,
proposed directives conform with the Chief, Forest Service.
The proposed directives have been
federalism principles set out in this
reviewed under USDA procedures and [FR Doc. E7–4261 Filed 3–8–07; 8:45 am]
E.O.; would not impose any compliance
E.O. 12866 on regulatory planning and BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
costs on the States; and would not have
review. The Office of Management and
substantial direct effects on the States,
Budget (OMB) has determined that these
the relationship between the Federal
proposed directives are not significant COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
government and the States, or the
for purposes of E.O. 12866. These PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
distribution of power and
proposed directives would not have an SEVERELY DISABLED
responsibilities among the various
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy, nor would they adversely levels of government. Therefore, the
Procurement List; Additions and
affect productivity, competition, jobs, agency has determined that no further
Deletions
the environment, public health and assessment of federalism implications is
safety, or State and local governments. necessary. AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From
These proposed directives would not Moreover, these proposed directives People Who Are Blind or Severely
interfere with any action taken or would not have Tribal implications as Disabled.
planned by another agency, nor would defined by E.O. 13175, Consultation and ACTION: Additions to and deletions from
they raise new legal or policy issues. Coordination With Indian Tribal Procurement List.
Finally, these proposed directives Governments, and therefore advance
would not alter the budgetary impact of consultation with Tribes is not required. SUMMARY: This action adds to the
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan Procurement List products and services
Energy Effects to be furnished by nonprofit agencies
programs or the rights and obligations of
beneficiaries of such programs. These proposed directives have been employing persons who are blind or
Accordingly, these proposed directives reviewed under E.O. 13211 of May 18, have other severe disabilities, and
are not subject to OMB review under 2001, Actions Concerning Regulations deletes from the Procurement List
E.O. 12866. That Significantly Affect the Energy products previously furnished by such
Supply. It has been determined that agencies.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis these proposed directives would not DATES: Effective Date: April 8, 2007.
These proposed directives have been constitute a significant energy action as
ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase
considered in light of the Regulatory defined in the E.O.
From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602 et seq. The
Unfunded Mandates Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800,
proposed directives would not have any
1421 Jefferson Davis Highway,
effect on small entities as defined by the Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded
Arlington, VA 22202–3259.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
proposed directives would require 1531–1538), which the President signed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT
identification at the field level, with into law on March 22, 1995, the agency COMMENTS CONTACT: Kimberly M. Zeich,
public input, of a designated system of has assessed the effects of these Telephone: (703) 603–7740, Fax: (703)
roads, trails, and areas for motor vehicle proposed directives on State, local, and 603–0655, or e-mail
use. The proposed directives would not Tribal governments and the private CMTEFedReg@jwod.gov.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

directly affect small businesses, small sector. These proposed directives would SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
organizations, and small governmental not compel the expenditure of $100
entities. The agency has determined that million or more by any State, local, or Additions
these proposed directives would not Tribal government or anyone in the On January 12, 2007, the Committee
have a significant economic impact on private sector. Therefore, a statement for Purchase From People Who Are

VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:24 Mar 08, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1
10640 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Notices

Blind or Severely Disabled published NSN: 8950–01–E61–0100—Taco Mix substantial number of small entities.
notice (72 FR 1490, 1491) of proposed Seasoning (Group II); The major factors considered for this
additions to the Procurement List. NSN: 8950–01–E61–0101—Taco Mix certification were:
After consideration of the material Seasoning (Group II); 1. The action may result in additional
NSN: 8950–01–E61–0102—Taco Mix
presented to it concerning capability of Seasoning (Group II); reporting, recordkeeping or other
qualified nonprofit agencies to provide NSN: 8950–01–E61–0103—Cayenne compliance requirements for small
the products and services and impact of Pepper; entities.
the additions on the current or most NSN: 8950–01–E61–0104—Ginger Ground; 2. The action may result in
recent contractors, the Committee has NSN: 8950–01–E61–0105—Ginger Ground; authorizing small entities to furnish the
determined that the products and NSN: 8950–01–E61–0106—Cayenne products to the Government.
services listed below are suitable for Pepper; 3. There are no known regulatory
NSN: 8950–01–E61–0107—Cayenne alternatives which would accomplish
procurement by the Federal Government Pepper;
under 41 U.S.C. 46–48c and 41 CFR 51– the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-
NSN: 8950–01–E61–0108—Red Pepper.
2.4. Coverage: C-List for the requirements of O’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in
Defense Supply Center Philadelphia connection with the products deleted
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification from the Procurement List.
(DSCP).
I certify that the following action will NPA: Continuing Developmental Services,
Inc., Fairport, NY. End of Certification
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Contracting Activity: Defense Supply Accordingly, the following products
The major factors considered for this Center Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. are deleted from the Procurement List:
certification were: Services Products
1. The action will not result in any Service Type/Location: Administrative Holder, Card Label:
additional reporting, recordkeeping or Services, Calexico Border Station, Port of NSN: 9905–00–045–3624—Holder, Card
other compliance requirements for small Entry, Calexico, CA. Label;
entities other than the small NPA: ARC-Imperial Valley, El Centro, CA. NSN: 9905–00–045–3626—Holder, Card
organizations that will furnish the Contracting Activity: Department of Label;
Homeland Security, Customs and Border NSN: 9905–00–782–3768—Holder, Card
products and services to the Protection, Washington, DC.
Government. Label.
Service Type/Location: Custodial Services, NPA: Unknown.
2. The action will result in Federal Building, 555 Independence, Contracting Activity: GSA, Southwest
authorizing small entities to furnish the Cape Girardeau, MO. Supply Center, Fort Worth, TX.
products and services to the NPA: Cape Girardeau Community Sheltered
Government. Workshop, Inc., Cape Girardeau, MO. Sheryl D. Kennerly,
3. There are no known regulatory Contracting Activity: GSA, PBS—Region 6, Director, Information Management.
alternatives which would accomplish Kansas City, MO.
[FR Doc. E7–4255 Filed 3–8–07; 8:45 am]
Service Type/Location: Custodial Services,
the objectives of the Javits-Wagner- BILLING CODE 6353–01–P
Kastenmeir U.S. Courthouse, (120 North
O’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in Henry Street), Madison, WI.
connection with the products and NPA: Madison Area Rehabilitation Centers,
services proposed for addition to the Inc., Madison, WI. COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
Procurement List. Contracting Activity: GSA, Public Buildings PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
Service, Region 5, Chicago, IL. SEVERELY DISABLED
End of Certification Service Type/Location: Custodial Services,
Accordingly, the following products U.S. DOI—Bureau of Land Mgmt., (Eight Procurement List; Proposed Additions
and services are added to the Recreation Areas/Campgrounds), and Deletions
Bessemer Bend Rec Site, Golden Eye Rec
Procurement List: Site, Government Bridge Site, Lodgepole
Products
ACTION: Proposed additions to and
Campground, Muddy Mountain
Educational Kiosk, Poison Spider OHV
deletions from procurement list.
Hydramax Hydration System:
NSN: 8465–00–NIB–0080—Replacement Rec Site, Rim Campground, Trappers SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing
Reservoir, Alpha and Mustang; Route #1 Rec Site, Casper, WY.
NPA: Northwest Community Action
to add to the Procurement List services
NSN: 8465–00–NIB–0139—Mustang, to be furnished by nonprofit agencies
Black; Programs of Wyoming, Inc., Casper, WY.
Contracting Activity: U.S. DOI—Bureau of employing persons who are blind or
NSN: 8465–00–NIB–0151—Mustang,
Universal Camouflage; Land Mgmt., Denver, CO. have other severe disabilities, and to
NSN: 8465–00–NIB–0152—Mustang, delete products previously furnished by
Deletions
Desert Camouflage; such agencies.
NSN: 8465–00–NIB–0154—Alpha, High On January 12, 2007, the Committee Comments Must Be Received on or
Visibility Orange; for Purchase From People Who Are Before: April 8, 2007.
NSN: 8465–00–NIB–0155—Alpha, Blind or Severely Disabled published ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase
Universal Camouflage. notice (72 FR1491) of proposed From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Coverage: B-list—for (Broad Government deletions to the Procurement List. Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800,
Requirement) as aggregated by the After consideration of the relevant
General Services Administration.
1421 Jefferson Davis Highway,
matter presented, the Committee has Arlington, Virginia, 22202–3259.
NPA: The Lighthouse for the Blind, Inc. determined that the products listed
(Seattle Lighthouse), Seattle, WA. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT
below are no longer suitable for COMMENTS CONTACT: Kimberly M. Zeich,
Contracting Activity: GSA, Southwest
Supply Center, Fort Worth, TX. procurement by the Federal Government
Telephone: (703) 603–7740, Fax: (703)
under 41 U.S.C. 46–48c and 41 CFR 51–
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

Spices, Dry, Group II: 603–0655, or e-mail


NSN: 8950–01–E60–9152—Ground Ginger; 2.4.
CMTEFedReg@jwod.gov.
NSN: 8950–01–E60–9155—Cayenne Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Pepper; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
NSN: 8950–01–E61–0099—Taco Mix I certify that the following action will notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C
Seasoning; not have a significant impact on a 47(a) (2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. Its purpose

VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:24 Mar 08, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1

Вам также может понравиться