Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Notices 10219

Average
Form name & Number of
Number of burden per re- Total burden
number (CFR Respondents responses per
respondents spondent (in hours)
reference) respondent (in hours)

83.9 ................... Petitioners using Form A ................................................ 30 1 3/60 1.5


83.9 ................... Petitioners using Form B ................................................ 40 1 5 200
83.9 ................... Petitioners not using Form B .......................................... 5 1 5.5 27.5
83.18 ................. Petitioners Appealing proposed decisions ..................... 5 1 45/60 3.75

Total .......... ......................................................................................... 80 ........................ ........................ 233

Dated: February 28, 2007. whether the information shall have at a national corporation. The purpose
Joan F. Karr, practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the of the proposed evaluation is to
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for agency’s estimate of the burden of the document in detail the workplace IPV
Disease Control and Prevention. proposed collection of information; (c) prevention activities delivered by the
[FR Doc. E7–3985 Filed 3–6–07; 8:45 am] ways to enhance the quality, utility, and company, to determine the impact of
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P clarity of the information to be these activities on short-term and long-
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the term outcomes, and to determine the
burden of the collection of information cost-effectiveness of the program. All
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND on respondents, including through the managers at the corporation will be
HUMAN SERVICES use of automated collection techniques screened to assess training experiences.
or other forms of information Then, more in-depth surveys will be
Centers for Disease Control and technology. Written comments should
Prevention done among managers who have not
be received within 60 days of this
had the corporation’s IPV training. We
[60-Day 07–07AN]
notice.
will survey those 500 managers at
Proposed Project baseline, and 6 and 12 months later.
Proposed Data Collections Submitted Manager surveys will focus on
for Public Comment and Program Effectiveness Evaluation of
Workplace Intervention for Intimate knowledge/awareness of IPV and
Recommendations
Partner Violence (IPV)—New—National company resources for IPV and number
In compliance with the requirement Center for Injury Prevention and of referrals for IPV assistance. We will
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Control, Centers for Disease Control and also survey employees of those
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for Prevention (CDC). managers using an anonymous web-
opportunity for public comment on based survey at baseline and 12 months
proposed data collection projects, the Background and Brief Description
later to assess their self-evaluated
Centers for Disease Control and Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects productivity, absenteeism, and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic a substantial number of Americans, and perceptions of manager behavior. We
summaries of proposed projects. To there has recently been increasing will compare the responses of managers
request more information on the recognition of the impact it has on the (and their employees) who received the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of workplace. In addition to direct impacts IPV training in the study period (i.e.,
the data collection plans and (batterers often stalk or even attack IPV sometime between the baseline and 12
instruments, call 404–639–5960 and victims at their place of work), IPV has month surveys) with untrained
send comments to Joan Karr, CDC indirect impacts on the workplace
managers. The study will provide CDC
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, 1600 environment through lost productivity
and employers information about the
Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA due to medical leave, absenteeism, and
potential effectiveness and cost-
30333 or send an e-mail to fear and distraction on the part of
effectiveness of workplace IPV
omb@cdc.gov. victims and coworkers. The Centers for
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) intervention strategies.
the proposed collection of information has employed contractor support to There are no costs to respondents
is necessary for the proper performance evaluate an ongoing workplace IPV except their time to participate in the
of the functions of the agency, including prevention program being implemented interview.

ESTIMATE OF ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS

Average bur-
Number of re-
Number of re- den per re- Total burden
Respondents sponses per
spondents sponse (in hours)
respondent (in hours)

Employee ......................................................................................................... 1500 2 30/60 1500


Manager ........................................................................................................... 500 3 30/60 75
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Total .......................................................................................................... 2000 ........................ ........................ 2250

VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:10 Mar 06, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM 07MRN1
10220 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Notices

Dated: February 28, 2007. 4. This delegation of authority does DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
Joan F. Karr, not include the authority to approve or HUMAN SERVICES
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for disapprove awards for grants or
Disease Control and Prevention. contracts for research, demonstration, or Food and Drug Administration
[FR Doc. E7–3986 Filed 3–6–07; 8:45 am] evaluation under section 649 of the
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P Head Start Act. [Docket No. 2006N–0036]
5. This delegation of authority does Agency Information Collection
not include the authority to appoint Activities; Submission for Office of
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES Central Office or Regional Office Grant Management and Budget Review;
Officers for the administration of the Comment Request; Experimental
Administration for Children and Head Start Program. Study of Possible Footnotes and
Families 6. This delegation of authority does Cueing Schemes to Help Consumers
not include the authority to appoint Interpret Quantitative Trans Fat
Statement of Organization, Functions Action Officials for Audit Resolution. Disclosure on the Nutrition Facts Panel
and Delegation of Authority;
Republication 7. This delegation of authority does AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,
not include the authority to sign and HHS.
Editorial Note: FR Doc. E7–3306 originally issue notices of grant awards.
published at page 8742 in the issue of ACTION: Notice.
8. This delegation of authority does
Tuesday, February 27, 2007. The original
not include the authority to hold SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
publication contained erroneous text. As a
result, the corrected document is being hearings. This limitation does not Administration (FDA) is announcing
republished in its entirety. include the ‘‘informal meetings’’ that a proposed collection of
authorized in 45 CFR part 1303. information has been submitted to the
Notice is hereby given that I have
delegated to the Director, Office of Head 9. Any redelegation shall be in writing Office of Management and Budget
Start, the following authority vested in and prompt notification must be (OMB) for review and clearance under
me by the Secretary of Health and provided to all affected managers, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Human Services in a memorandum supervisors, and other personnel, and DATES: Fax written comments on the
dated August 20, 1991, pertaining to the requires the concurrence of the Deputy collection of information by April 6,
Head Start Program and the Child Assistant Secretary for Administration. 2007.
Development Associate Scholarship
Assistance Grants Program. (c) Effect on Existing Delegations ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
(a) Authority Delegated As related to this delegation of OMB recommends that written
authority, this delegation supersedes all comments be faxed to the Office of
Authority to administer the Head
previous delegations of authority Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Start Program under the Head Start Act,
involving the Head Start Program except OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
42 U.S.C. 9801 et seq., and as amended
now and hereafter. (This includes the September 25, 2002, delegation to 202–395–6974.
authority to administer the Early Head the Director, Office of Planning,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Start program.) Research and Evaluation relating to
Jonna Capezzuto, Office of the Chief
section 649 of the Head Start Act.
(b) Limitations Information Officer (HFA–250), Food
(d) Effective Date and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
1. This delegation of authority shall Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–
be exercised under the Department’s This delegation is effective upon the 4659.
existing policies on delegations and date of signature.
regulations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
I hereby affirm and ratify any actions
2. This delegation of authority does compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
taken by the Director, Office of Head has submitted the following proposed
not include the authority to submit
reports to Congress and shall be Start, which involved the exercise of the collection of information to OMB for
exercised under financial and authority delegated herein prior to the review and clearance. In the Federal
administrative requirements applicable effective date of this delegation. Register of December 18, 2006 (71 FR
to all Administration for Children and Dated: February 16, 2007. 75762), FDA published a notice entitled
Families’ authorities. Wade F. Horn, ‘‘Agency Information Collection
3. The approval or disapproval of Assistant Secretary for Children and Families.
Activities; Submission for Office of
grant applications including refunding Management and Budget Review;
applications, the making of grant [FR Doc. E7–3306 Filed 2–26–07; 8:45 am] Comment Request; Experimental Study
awards, the waiver of non-Federal share Editorial Note: FR Doc. E7–3306 originally of Possible Footnotes and Cueing
under 42 U.S.C. 9835(b), the waiver of published at page 8742 in the issue of Schemes to Help Consumers Interpret
fifteen percent administrative cost Tuesday, February 27, 2007. The original Quantitative Trans Fat Disclosure on the
limitations under 42 U.S.C. 9839(b), and publication contained erroneous text. As a Nutrition Facts Panel.’’ This notice
the approval of interim grantees under result, the corrected document is being contained an incorrect deadline for
42 U.S.C. 9836(e) requires concurrence republished in its entirety. comments on the proposed collection of
of the appropriate Grants Officer. The [FR Doc. R7–3306 Filed 3–6–07; 8:45 am] information in the DATES section. FDA
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

approval or disapproval of contract BILLING CODE 1505–01–D is republishing the notice and providing
proposals and awards is subject to the a full 30-day comment period. Any
requirements of the Federal Acquisition comments previously submitted
Regulations and requires the regarding this notice will be considered
concurrence of the Contracting Officer. and do not need to be re-submitted.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:25 Mar 06, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM 07MRN1

Вам также может понравиться