Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Analytical Letters
Publication details, including instructions for
authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lanl20
Simultaneous Determination of
Tinidazole and Furazolidone in
Suspension by HPTLC and HPLC
a
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,
sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is
expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
N,M.Tendolkar,
B. S-Desai.
J. S. Gaudh
and V. M. Shlnde*
Analytical Laboratory,
The I n s t i t u t e o f Science, 15, Madam Cama Road,
Bombay 400 032, India.
ABSTRACT
High
performance
thin
layer
chromatographic
(HPTLC)
(HPLC)
methods
the
method
the
plate
as
mobile
phase.
Furazol idone
concentration
of
60F
and
Tinidazole
range
10-50
Tinidazole
254
(9:l:0.1
chIoroform:rnethanol:ammonia
using
separation
glass
for
HPTLC
respectively.
HPTLC
vlv)
and 0.79
Densitometric
L i n e a r i t y was obtained w i t h i n
yglml
and
3.5-17.5
pglml
for
(p
Bondapak C18)
1642
TENDOLKAR ET AL.
using
mobile
phase
comprised
for
of
acid.
Tinidazole
1.5
Retention
and
mllmin.
was
obtained
and
10.5-63
Furazolidone r e s p e c t i v e l y a t a f l o w
rate
was
the
for
were
done
5.24
at
335
concentration
Tinidazole
and
w i t h dil.
min
within
times
7.82
Detection
pglml
: acetonitrite
water
v l v ) adjusted t o p H = 3.0
t r i e t h y l a m i n e (80:20:0.1
phosphoric
of
nm.
range
and
Linearity
30-180
Pglml
Furazol idone
resp.
INTRODUCTION
[ 1 [ 2- ( E t h y I
T i n idazole
nitro-1 H-imidazolel
amino]-
i s a n i t r o f u r a n d e r i v a t i v e w i t h antiprotozoal
2-oxazolidinone]
activity.
Tinidazole
is
i s o f f i c i a l i n 1.P
official
, 6.P
in
1.P'
and U.S.P
and
J.P
HPLC17-18, G.C1',
TL?
the
simultaneous
yet
reported.
Furazolidone
G . c 1 2-1 3
methods
S i m i l a r l y spectrophotometric
14-16
determination
The
S p e c t r o p h ~ t o m e t i c ~ - ~ , HPLC8-11,
a r e r e p o r t e d f o r Tinidazole.
of
simultaneous
both
these
analysis
of
drugs
is
not
Tinidazole
and
1643
i s required for
t h e purpose o f q u a l i t y control
of these drugs.
In
this
communication
we
propose
HPTLC
and
HPLC
i n suspension form.
EXPERIMENTAL
Instrumentation
IV
Linomat
sample
II (Densitometer),
applicator,
Cats 3.15
v.
Camag
software,
TLC
Camag t w i n
LC
290
UV
Elmer
lsocratic
detector,
LC
Perkin
250
Elmer
pump,
PE
Perkin
Nelson
Bondapak C,*
Elmer
Integrator,
column (Waters,
India).
Materials
Authentic
samples
of
k i n d l y donated by Kopran ( I )
were procured from market.
Tinidazole and
TENDOLKAR ET AL.
1644
Reagents
Chromatographic
chloroform,
grade
triethylamine
water,
methanol
a c e t o n i t r i le,
and
analytical
were
accurate1y
(E.Merck, I n d i a )
Standard solution
Tinidazole (1OOmg) and F u r a t o l idone (35mg)
weighed
into
acetonitrile
ml
100
volumetric
w i t h ultrasonication
and
flask,
dissolved
diluted
to
volume
in
with
acetonitri le.
Procedure f o r HPTLC
Calibration
C a l i b r a t i o n solutions
volumes
(0.5-2.5
ml)
of
p r e p a r e d by
were
standard
solution
taking
in
50
varying
ml
flasks
10 microlitres
of
60F254 HPTLC
these
glass
solutions
plate
in
were
mm
applied
width
on
using
silicagel
sample
applicator.
The
chloroform
methanol
ammonia
( 9 : l :0.1
vlv)
as a mobile phase.
Densitometric
evaluation
was
done
by
TLC
scanner
drugs
vs.
curves
1645
were
concentration
constructed by
of
drugs
for
p l o t t i n g areas
both
Tinidazole
an
accurately
Sample preparation
After
weighed
of
determining
amount
equivalent
Furazol idone)
flask,
ml
50
mass
of
was
per
to
millilitre,
100 mg of
transferred
acetonitrile
into
was
Tinidazole
ml
100
added,
(35 mg
calibrated
ultrasonicated
for
The
resulting
no.1
(solution A).
Then
solution
ml
of
was
filtered
solution A
through
was
Whatman paper
pipetted
into a
50
ml
microlitres
of
the
final
dried,
scanned
solution
p l a t e and
and
peak
was
the
areas
applied
plate
were
on
was
recorded
as r e p o r t e d i n c a l i b r a t i o n procedure.
Procedure f o r HPLC
Cal ibration
Calibration
solutions
were
prepared by taking
varying
m l ) i n s i x 50 ml standard
TENDOLKAR ET AL.
1646
microlitres
20
of
the
above
solutions
were
injected
into chromatograph.
The
mobile
triethylamine
dilute
0.22
mllmin.
consisted
acid.
of
adjusted
vlv)
(80:20:0.1
phosphoric
through
1.5
phase
water:acetonitrile:
to
This
was
filtered
Whatman paper.
Flow
rate
with
an
average
operating
pH
and
was
pressure
with
3.0
degassed
kept
at
2200
psi
curves
were
constructed
by
plotting
peak
concentration.
Sample p r e p a r a t i o n
50
ml
calibrated
t h e mobile phase.
into
flask
and
diluted
to
the
mark
with
chromatograph
and
peak
areas
were
recorded
for
both
t h e drugs as i n t h e c a l i b r a t i o n experiment.
Recovery Studies
To
and
to
study
check
formulation,
the
the
accuracy,
interference
recovery
reproducibility,
from
experiments
excepients
were
carried
precision
used
out
in the
by
the
of
standard
1647
Tinidazole
and
% recovery
was calculated.
TLC,
various
mobile
phase m i x t u r e s
vlv)
(9:l:O:l
R f values obtained
were
tried
on
A m i x t u r e o f chloroform:
gave
were
good
0.63
resolution
and
0.79
of
for
the
interference o f t h e
bands
of
inactive
ingredients.
For
were
obtained
and 3.5-17.5
The
quantitative
within
application,
the
linear
concentration
calibration
range
10-50
graphs
yglml
calibration
curves
regression equations.
could
be
represented
by
following
TENDOLKAR ET AL.
1648
Table 1
Determination
of
Tinidazole
and
by
F u r a z o l idone
HPTLC
L a b e l c l a i m :- T i n i d a z o l e (100 m g / 5 m l )
F u r a z o l i d o n e (35 mg/5 m l )
101.72
34.01
100.02
34.25
99.43
34.21
99.38
34.03
97.96
34.81
100.26
34.69
98.43
34.98
(Tinidazole)
(Furazol
These
= 33.5860
idone)
equations
= 51.8000
were
23.000
(r=0.999)
X + 7.0800
used
for
(r=0.998)
direct
evaluation
of
drugs.
Results o f t h e r e p l i c a t e a n a l y s i s and r e c o v e r y e x p e r i m e n t
o f suspension a r e t a b u l a t e d i n T a b l e 1 and T a b l e 2 r e s p e c t i v e l y .
1649
Table 2
Result of the r e c o v e r y experiment by HPTLC.
Amount o f
drug
present
mg/5 m l
Drug
name
T i n idazole
Amount o f
standard
added
m g / 5 ml
Total
Amount
% Recovery
recovered*
mg/5 m l
100
100
100
100
100
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
99.48
118.24
140.77
157.89
179.33
99.48
98.53
100.55
98.68
99.63
35
35
35
35
35
0.00
7.00
14.00
21.00
28.00
34.58
41.92
49.51
55.02
62.77
98.80
99.81
101.04
98.25
99.63
...................................
Mean Recovery :99.37
................................................................
Furazol idone
* .. Average
o f t h r e e experiments.
HPLC :In
order
to
effect
the
separation
of
stationary
phase and
mobile
phase
composition
was
the
two
drugs
a Bondapak
C18
phase comprising
v / v 1 was used.
optimised
and
pH
for
TENDOLKAR ET AL.
1650
Table 3
Determination
of
L a b e l c l a i m :-
Tinidazole
and
Furazol idone by
Tinidazole ( 1 0 0 m g / 5 m l )
Furazolidone (35 mg/5 m l )
Samp Ie
no.
Furazol idone
Content obtained
(mgl5 ml)
T i n idazole
Content obtained
(mg15 m l )
99.11
34.54
100.54
34.23
100.18
34.18
98.35
34.40
98.28
35.01
100.90
34.49
99.89
34.64
Under
well
the
described
defined,
r a t e of
HPLC
1.5
resolved
using d i l u t e p h o s p h o r i c
conditions,
and
free
the
analyte
peaks
from
tailing.
At
and
1651
Table 4
Results o f t h e r e c o v e r y experiment by HPLC.
Amount of
drug
present
m g / 5 ml
Drug
name
Amount o f
standard
added
m g / 5 ml
Total
% Recovery
Amount
recovered*
m g / 5 ml
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.08
120.45
139.41
1 58.82
178.40
................................................................
100
100
100
100
100
Tinidazole
100.08
100.38
99.58
99.26
99.11
35
35
35
35
35
Furazol idone
99.68
99.00
101.62
98.94
99.86
100.13
34.65
42.68
48.48
55.92
63.08
___________________---_-------Mean Recovery :-
99.91
:- Average o f t h r e e experiments.
The
optimum
wavelength
for
detection
was
335
nm
was
30-180 p g l r n l and
obtained
10.5-63
in
the
concentration
Fglrnl respectively.
range
The c a l i b r a t i o n
( T i n idazole)
(Furazolidone)
= 23.0323
X + 18.650
= 41.3796
X + 15.0636
(r=0.999)
(r=0.999)
TENDOLKAR ET AL.
1652
These
drugs.
ment
equations
used
for
direct
evaluation
of
suspension
are
tabulated
i n Table 3
Anchrom
Enterprises
and
Table
respectively
were
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Authors
are
grateful
to
for
providing
HPTLC f a c i l i t i e s .
REFERENCES
1.
2.
Pharmacopoeia of Japan,
3.
4.
5.
U.S.P.
6.
C.S.
XXII,
-
596-597
Sadana
and
544-545
(1992).
(1985).
(1990).
M.V.
Gaonkar,
Indian
Drugs,
26(9),
51 0-51 3 ( 1 989).
7.
T.K.
Das,
and D.
Hader,
Indian Drugs,
29(4),
165-170
(1992).
8.
K.B.
Alton
599-601
9.
L.P.
J.E.
Patrick,
J.
Pharm,
Sci,
68(5),
175(2),
( 1 979).
Hackett and
347-349
10.
and
L.J.
Dusci,
J.
Chromatogr.
( 1 979).
Nilsson-Ehle,
Ingrid,
B.O.
Ursing,
and
Nilsson-Elhe,
Antimicrob-Agents
1653
Chemother.,
19( 5 ) ,
754-760
(1981 ).
11.
12.
M.
S.
Menouer,
J.
Pharm. Belg.,
H.
Laufen,
Guermouche
4 2 ( 4 ) , 243-246
S.C.
Bhatia
Appl.,
Biomed.
Bartsch,
50, 217-220
V.D.
and
30
M.H.
Chromatogr.,
J.
(1979).
Shaanbhag,
(2(J.
Guermouche,
(1987).
Scharpf and G.
F.
1 6 3 ( 2 ) , Biomed.Appl.,
13.
and
Chromatogr.,
J.
Chromatogr.,
305)),,
325-334
M.
Kelani,
( 1 984).
14.
Laila
Elsayed,
and Hamed M.
S.M.
Hassan,
M.I.
Lett.,
17.
S.M.
Lett.,
18.
S.M.
A.R.
Walash,
Khadiga
Assoc.
J.
off.
Anal.
Chem.,
( 1980).
F.
Belal and M.
A.M.
El-Brashy
2 6 ( 3 ) , 499-512
Hassan,
Sultan,
Talanta,
35(12),
F.A.
Hassan, F.A.
Ritchie,
H a r r y S.
and
lbrahim
and
Sultan,
Anal.
M.M.
Hefnawy,
Anal.
(1990).
Ibrahim, M.S.
30 (3-4),
M.H.
M.A.
(1993).
2 3 ( 4 ) , 599-606
20( 2 ) , 225-229
20.
Hassan,
El-Fatatry,
Chromatographia,
19.
M.
( 1 988).
977-980
16.
Sayed
176-1 80 ( 1990).
Solly,
N.Z.J.
Sci.,
( 1 977).
Harrington,
J.
Chromatogr.,