Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Proposed Rules 9297

competitive services. The NPRM also pound net leaders in the Virginia waters to as ‘‘Pound Net Regulated Area I’’.
seeks information on what impact cable of the mainstem Chesapeake Bay. Pound Net Regulated Area I is defined
system clusters, the distribution of Current regulations require modified as the Virginia waters of the mainstem
regional programming services, and pound net leaders, as defined in the Chesapeake Bay, south of 37°19.0′ N.
horizontal consolidation have on the regulations, in a portion of the Virginia lat. and west of 76°13.0′ W. long., and
programming marketplace. The NPRM Chesapeake Bay, and allow them to be all waters south of 37°13.0′ N. lat. to the
also inquires about whether there has used in a different portion of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel
been any change in the resources and Chesapeake Bay. This proposed action (extending from approximately 37°05′
ability of nonaffiliated cable operators would ensure that leaders used in those N. lat., 75°59′ W. long. to 36°55′ N. lat.,
and competitive MVPDs to develop areas do in fact meet the definition of a 76 08′ W. long.) at the mouth of the
their own programming. In addition, modified pound net leader. This action, Chesapeake Bay, and the portion of the
comment is sought on what effect the taken under the Endangered Species Act James River downstream of the
prohibition has had on preserving and of 1973 (ESA), as amended, is intended Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel (I–64;
protecting diversity in the distribution to facilitate compliance with the approximately 36°59.55′ N. lat., 76°
of video programming. existing regulation, which is designed to 18.64′ W. long.) and the York River
help protect threatened and endangered downstream of the Coleman Memorial
F. Federal Rules Which Duplicate,
sea turtles. Bridge (Route 17; approximately
Overlap, or Conflict With the
DATES: Comments on this action are 37°14.55′ N. lat, 76°30.40′ W. long.). An
Commission’s Proposals
requested, and must be received at the offshore pound net leader refers to a
None. appropriate address or fax number (see leader with the inland end set greater
VI. Ordering Clauses ADDRESSES) by no later than 5 p.m., than 10 horizontal feet (3 m) from the
eastern daylight time, on April 2, 2007. mean low water line. The May 2004 rule
44. Accordingly, it is ordered that, also placed restrictions on nearshore
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
pursuant to the authority contained in pound net leaders in Pound Net
Sections 4(i), 303 and 628 of the submitted on this proposed rule,
identified by RIN 0648–AU98, by any Regulated Area I and on all pound net
Communications Act of 1934, as leaders employed in ‘‘Pound Net
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 303 and 548, one of the following methods:
(1) E-mail: Regulated Area II.’’ Pound Net
notice is hereby given of the proposals Regulated Area II refers to Virginia
described in this NPRM of Proposed poundnetinspection@noaa.gov. Please
include the RIN 0648–AU98 in the waters of the Chesapeake Bay, outside of
Rulemaking. Pound Net Regulated Area I as defined
45. It is further ordered that the subject line of the message.
(2) Federal eRulemaking Portal: above, extending to the Maryland-
Commission’s Consumer and Virginia State line (approximately
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions on the website for 37°55′ N. lat., 75°55′ W. long.), the Great
Information Center, will send a copy of Wicomico River downstream of the
this NPRM of Proposed Rule Making, submitting comments.
(3) NMFS/Northeast Region Website: Jessie Dupont Memorial Highway Bridge
including the IRFA, to the Chief (Route 200; approximately 37°50.84′ N.
http://www.nero.noaa.gov/nero/regs/
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small lat, 76°22.09′ W. long.), the
com.html Follow the instructions on the
Business Administration, in accordance Rappahannock River downstream of the
website for submitting comments.
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Robert Opie Norris Jr. Bridge (Route 3;
(4) Mail: Mary A. Colligan, Assistant
Federal Communications Commission. Regional Administrator for Protected approximately 37°37.44′ N. lat,
Marlene H. Dortch, Resources, NMFS, Northeast Region, 76°25.40′ W. long.), and the Piankatank
Secretary. One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA River downstream of the Route 3 Bridge
[FR Doc. E7–3520 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am] 01930, ATTN: Sea Turtle Conservation (approximately 37°30.62′ N. lat,
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P Measures, Proposed Rule 76°25.19′ W. long.) to the COLREGS line
(5) Facsimile (fax): 978–281–9394, at the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay.
ATTN: Sea Turtle Conservation According to the 2004 rule, nearshore
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Measures, Proposed Rule pound net leaders in Pound Net
Written comments regarding the Regulated Area I and all pound net
National Oceanic and Atmospheric burden-hour estimates or other aspects leaders in Pound Net Regulated Area II
Administration of the collection-of-information must have mesh size less than 12 inches
requirements contained in this proposed (30.5 cm) stretched mesh and may not
50 CFR Part 223 rule may be submitted in one of the employ stringers.
above formats and by e-mail to In 2004 and 2005, NMFS
[Docket No. 070215034–7034–01; I.D. DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
020907D] implemented a coordinated research
(202) 395–7285. program with pound net industry
RIN 0648–AU98 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participants and other interested parties
Pasquale Scida (ph. 978–281–9208, fax to develop and test a modified pound
Sea Turtle Conservation; Fishing Gear 978–281–9394), or Barbara Schroeder net leader design with the goal of
Inspection Program (ph. 301–713–2322, fax 301–427–2522). eliminating or reducing sea turtle
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: interactions while retaining an
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and acceptable level of fish catch. The
Background modified pound net leader design used
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS

Commerce. Based upon documented sea turtle in the experiment consisted of a


ACTION: Proposed rule; request for interactions with pound net leaders, combination of mesh and stiff vertical
comments. NMFS issued a final rule on May 5, lines. The mesh size was equal to or less
2004 (69 FR 24997), that prohibited the than 8 inches (20.3 cm). The mesh was
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to establish use of offshore pound net leaders from positioned at a depth that was no more
an inspection program for modified May 6 to July 15 in an area now referred than one-third the depth of the water.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:56 Feb 28, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1
9298 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Proposed Rules

The vertical lines were 5⁄16 inch (0.8 cm) (e) the vertical lines are hard lay lines If a pound net fisherman intends to
in diameter strung vertically at a with a level of stiffness equivalent to the use a modified pound net leader
minimum of every 2 feet (61 cm) and stiffness of a 5⁄16 inch (0.8 cm) diameter anywhere in Pound Net Regulated Area
attached to a top line. The vertical lines line composed of polyester wrapped I or Pound Net Regulated Area II at any
rose from the top of the mesh up to a around a blend of polypropylene and time during the period from May 6
top line to which they were attached. In polyethylene and containing through July 15, he or she would adhere
2005, hard lay line was used for the approximately 42 visible twists of to the following requirements of the
vertical lines in order to make them strands per foot of line. inspection program. First, the pound net
stiffer. The hard lay lines used in 2005 Existing mesh size and stringer fisherman, or his/her representative,
were made of 5⁄16 inch (0.8 cm) sinking restrictions on nearshore pound net would call NMFS at 757–414–0128 at
line, and were polyester-wrapped leaders in Pound Net Regulated Area I least 72 hours before the modified
around Polysteel, which is a blend of and all pound net leaders in Pound Net leaders are to be deployed. During this
polypropylene and polyethylene. The Regulated Area II remain in place from call, the fisherman or representative and
design was based on the premise that May 6 through July 15 each year. NMFS would discuss a meeting date,
the sea turtles would pass through the However, the June 2006 rule created an time, and location, as well as the
upper two-thirds of the leader, through exception to those restrictions by fisherman’s plans for setting his/her
the stiff vertical lines, without allowing the use of modified pound net gear. While NMFS realizes that setting
entangling in or impinging on the leaders during that period in nearshore pound net gear is dependent upon
leader. pound net leaders in Pound Net weather conditions, allotting a window
During the 2–year study, the modified Regulated Area I and all pound net of 72 hours or more enables the
leader was found to be effective in leaders in Pound Net Regulated Area II. fishermen and NMFS to arrange a
reducing sea turtle interactions as The year-round reporting and mutually agreeable meeting time to
compared to the unmodified leader. The monitoring requirements for this fishery examine the modified leaders. The
final results of the 2004 study found and the framework mechanism under second component of the inspection
that out of eight turtles impinged on or
the existing regulations (May 5, 2004, 69 program involves a meeting between
entangled in the leaders of pound nets,
FR 24997) also remained in effect. NMFS and the fisherman at the dock or
seven were impinged on or entangled in
place of leader fabrication, or another
an unmodified leader. One leatherback The Proposed Action
mutually agreeable place, to allow
turtle was found entangled in a
modified leader. In response to the After the 2006 final rule was NMFS to examine the gear. This
leatherback entanglement, the gear was published, NMFS determined that an inspection may include, but is not
further modified by increasing the onshore inspection program that limited to, measuring the mesh size, the
stiffness of the vertical lines for the 2005 examines a modified leader ready for spacing and diameter of the vertical
experiment. The 2005 experiment found deployment would help ensure the lines, and the height of the mesh in
that 15 turtles entangled in unmodified protection of sea turtles, while avoiding relation to the entire leader height, as
leaders, but no turtles were impinged on the difficulties of and potential costs to well as examining the hard lay line, to
or entangled in modified leaders. fishermen associated with post- help ensure the modified leader meets
Furthermore, results of the finfish catch deployment inspections at-sea. For the definition of a modified leader as
comparison suggest that the modified example, most of the pound net leader established in the June 2006 final rule.
leader caught similar quantities and size is typically set under the water, the During the inspection, the fisherman
compositions as the unmodified leader. water clarity in the Chesapeake Bay is must inform NMFS of the specific
Based upon these results, on June 23, generally poor, and there may be debris location of deployment of his or her
2006, NMFS issued a final rule (71 FR in the water that could endanger the inspected pound net leader. If the
36024) that required any offshore pound inspector. In addition, if a fisherman modified leader meets the regulatory
net leader in Pound Net Regulated Area was asked to haul the leader for an requirements, NMFS will tag the leader
I during the time period from May 6 inspection once it was deployed, there with one or more tamperproof tags
through July 15 to meet the definition of would be a loss in fishing time. The (provided by NMFS) each of which will
a modified pound net leader. A modified leader configuration was be marked with a unique identification
modified pound net leader was defined developed to protect sea turtles, and it number. Additionally, the fisherman
as a pound net leader that is affixed to is important that the leaders deployed will receive a letter from NMFS at the
or resting on the sea floor and made of in this fishery meet the same standards time of inspection noting that the leader
a lower portion of mesh and an upper as those tested in 2004 and 2005 and has been inspected, the date of the
portion of only vertical lines such that now embodied in the regulations. NMFS inspection, the license holder’s name for
(a) the mesh size is equal to or less than proposes an inspection program that the site at which the leader will be set,
8 inches (20.3 cm) stretched mesh; (b) would: (1) Provide fishermen with the the tag numbers of the attached tags,
at any particular point along the leader assurance that their leaders meet the and the location of the inspected pound
the height of the mesh from the seafloor definition of a modified pound net net leader. This letter must remain with
to the top of the mesh must be no more leader before setting their gear, thereby the fisherman during fishing activities.
than one-third the depth of the water at avoiding the costs associated with The fisherman could then set his or her
mean lower low water directly above having to haul their gear during the inspected leaders at any time after the
that particular point; (c) the mesh is fishing season, fix any parts of the dockside check, but the tags must
held in place by vertical lines that leader determined by an authorized remain on the gear. After tagging by
extend from the top of the mesh up to officer during an at-sea inspection to be NMFS, the tags may not be tampered
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS

a top line, which is a line that forms the non-compliant with the regulation, and with or removed from the inspected
uppermost part of the pound net leader; reset the gear; (2) provide managers with nets. Any modification to the tags on the
(d) the vertical lines are equal to or the knowledge that the offshore leaders leader, or their removal, is prohibited
greater than 5/16–inch (0.8–cm) in in Pound Net Regulated Area I are and voids the inspection information in
diameter and strung vertically at a configured in a ‘‘turtle-safe’’ manner; the letter. If such occurs and the
minimum of every 2 feet (61 cm); and and (3) aid in enforcement efforts. inspection information in the letter

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:56 Feb 28, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Proposed Rules 9299

becomes void, the fisherman would not Net Regulated Area I or Pound Net compliance rate for use of the modified
be in compliance with the regulations Regulated Area II, at any time during the leader for offshore pound nets in
and be subject to law enforcement period from 12:01 a.m. local time on Regulated Area I is not 100 percent,
action. If the onshore inspection May 6 through 11:59 p.m. local time on there is potential for a reduction in the
indicates that the gear does not meet the July 15 in any year, the pound net benefits from turtle protection. The
requirements, then the fisherman would leader must be inspected on land by economic incentives for a fisherman to
be told how to make his or her gear NMFS. This action would be decide not to comply with the existing
compliant with the regulation before implemented under the authority of the regulations are minor; however,
setting it in the water for the season. ESA sections 4(d) and 11(f) and is fishermen may not comply with the
Compared to other gear types and necessary and appropriate to conserve modified leader design specifications
fisheries, the pound net fishery in threatened sea turtles and to enforce the due to an inadvertent error in
Virginia has several characteristics that provisions of the ESA, including the construction. In either case, benefits
make an inspection program such as prohibition on takes of endangered sea from the existing regulation could be
this necessary, and possible, to turtles. reduced.
implement. The gear is only deployed All of the previously established The cost to a fisherman of undergoing
once during a season (unless later NMFS regulations affecting sea turtles a land based inspection is small.
damaged), and the fact that the leaders and pound net leaders in the Assuming that fishing is not impeded by
are below the surface combined with the Chesapeake Bay remain in effect. the regulation 1, and the inspection is
low water clarity and visibility in arranged at a location convenient to the
Classification
Chesapeake Bay make inspection of the fisherman, the principal cost to
gear during the season virtually This proposed rule has been fishermen would be the opportunity
impossible. The number of pound nets determined to be not significant for cost of their time to arrange and undergo
for which the gear modification is purposes of Executive Order 12866. the inspection estimated at $21.50 per
required is relatively small (<50), which NMFS has prepared an initial leader. Assuming telephone costs of
makes the inspection program feasible regulatory flexibility analysis that $1.25 to arrange the meeting, the total
to implement. describes the economic impact this cost would be $22.75 per leader.
Current regulations require any proposed rule, if adopted, would have Fishermen are also required to notify
offshore pound net leader in Pound Net on small entities. A description of the NMFS by telephone if a tag is lost,
Regulated Area I to meet the definition action, why it is being considered, and damaged or destroyed. It is estimated
of a modified pound net leader, and the legal basis for this action are such a call, should it be necessary,
allow the use of modified pound net contained in the preamble and in the would take approximately 5 minutes for
leaders in nearshore pound net leaders SUMMARY section. A summary of the an estimated cost of $2.90 per lost/
in Pound Net Regulated Area I and on analysis follows: damaged/destroyed tag (considering
all pound net leaders in Pound Net The fishery affected by this proposed telephone charges and opportunity cost
Regulated Area II. This inspection rule is the Virginia pound net fishery in of time).
program applies to all modified pound the Chesapeake Bay. The proposed The number of fishermen and leaders
net leaders that will be in the Virginia action would establish an inspection affected by this proposed rule will
Chesapeake Bay waters at any time program for modified pound net leaders depend on how many fishermen adopt
during the period from May 6 through in the Virginia waters of the mainstem the modified leader. At the low end, if
July 15. All modified pound net leaders Chesapeake Bay. we assume that only those fishermen
must be inspected by NMFS prior to The Final Environmental Assessment required to use the modified leader in
deployment, regardless of whether it is (EA) and Regulatory Impact Review order to fish do so, the estimate is five
in Pound Net Regulated Area I or Pound Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis of fishermen in the lower Bay with seven
Net Regulated Area II. NMFS can Sea Turtle Conservation Measures for offshore leaders would incur inspection
inspect a net at any time during the the Pound Net Fishery in Virginia costs. Depending on the number of
year, but all modified pound net leaders Waters of the Chesapeake Bay (June leaders a fisherman deploys, the cost
in Virginia Chesapeake Bay waters 2006) analyzed the economic impacts of per fisherman would range from $22.75
during the period from May 6 through requiring the use of the modified leader to $45.50 or 0.03 to 0.06 percent of
July 15 must have been inspected by for offshore pound nets in Regulated average annual revenues per fisherman.
NMFS. If a tag is damaged, destroyed or Area I and allowing the use of the A mid-range estimate suggests
lost by debris, vessel traffic, marine life, modified leader by all other pound nets fishermen would replace all offshore
or any other cause, the fisherman must in the Virginia waters of Chesapeake pound net leaders with the modified
call NMFS within 48 hours of discovery Bay between May 6 and July 15. The leader. At the end of five years, 21
to report this incident. Pound net analysis found the rule would increase fishermen with 32 pound nets would
fishermen are required to have their net revenues for five fishermen in the incur costs between $22.75 to $45.50 or
modified leaders inspected annually, lower Bay by allowing them to fish 0.03 to 0.08 percent of average annual
within one year from the previous date offshore pound nets during the revenues. At the high end, we can
of inspection. Note that if a modified regulated time period, compared to the assume that during the normal leader
leader is set prior to the issuance of a previous 2004 rule that prohibited replacement cycle, all fishermen
final rule, the modified leader would be leaders. The cost of fabricating and adopted the modified leader for all
allowed to remain in the water during deploying the modified leader was more pound nets used in Pound Net
the 2007 season, but it would need to be than offset by the increase in revenues.
inspected if it will be in either Pound Additionally, the EA noted that the
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS

1That is, fishermen are able to fish before the


Net Regulated Area I or II at any time public benefits from turtle protection regulated period with an existing leader.
during the period from May 6 through using the modified leader were Alternatively, if fishermen used the modified leader
July 15, in any subsequent year. indistinguishable from the leader outside the regulated period, they would generally
remove the leader for cleaning/maintenance at some
According to this proposed rule, if a prohibition. This rule does not change time during the year; if inspection services were
fisherman chooses to use a modified those conclusions; rather, it would help available during that time, fishing would not be
pound net leader, anywhere in Pound to support the benefits identified. If the impeded.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:56 Feb 28, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1
9300 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Proposed Rules

Regulated Areas I and II during May 6 performance of the functions of the and tagged by NMFS in accordance with
to July 15, the estimate at the end of five agency, including whether the 50 CFR 223.206(d)(10)(vii) prior to
years would be 21 fishermen and 46 information shall have practical utility; deploying the leader;
pound nets. The annual cost per the accuracy of the burden estimate; (18) Alter or replace any portion of a
fisherman would range from $22.75 to ways to enhance the quality, utility, and pound net leader that has been
$91.00, or 0.04 to 0.11 percent of clarity of the information to be previously tagged by NMFS in
average annual revenues. The total collected; and ways to minimize the accordance with 50 CFR
annual cost to the pound net industry burden of the collection of information, 223.206(d)(10)(vii) so that the altered or
would be $159.25 at the low level of including through the use of automated replaced portion is no longer consistent
adoption, or $1,046.50 under full collection techniques or other forms of with the modified pound net leader
adoption, which are 0.0073 to 0.0479 information technology. Send comments definition in 50 CFR 222.102, unless
percent of industry revenues. Note that on these or any other aspects of the that altered or replaced portion is
the cost of reporting lost, damaged, or collection of information to NMFS in inspected and tagged by NMFS in
destroyed tags is not included in the one of the formats listed in the accordance with 50 CFR
individual fisherman or industry ADDRESSES section above, and e-mail to 223.206(d)(10)(vii) or that alteration or
estimates because there is no verifiable DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to replacement occurs after the regulated
estimate of expected rate of tag loss. If (202) 395–7285. period of May 6 through July 15;
one assumes three tags per leader and a Notwithstanding any other provision (19) Remove, transfer, sell, purchase,
10–percent loss rate, the total industry of the law, no person is required to affix, or tamper with any tags used by
cost would increase by $5.80 to $40.60 respond to, nor shall any person be NMFS to mark pound net leaders;
per year depending on the level of subject to a penalty for failure to comply (20) Fish, tend, or haul a modified
adoption and the year. The alternative with, a collection of information subject pound net leader during the time period
to the proposed action is no action, for to the requirements of the PRA, unless from May 6 through July 15 unless the
which there would not be any economic that collection of information displays a fisherman has a pound net leader
impacts on small entities. currently valid OMB Control Number. inspection letter issued by NMFS on
To achieve compliance, the proposed board the vessel;
rule would require those fishermen who List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 223
* * * * *
wish to deploy a modified leader during Endangered and threatened species, 3. In § 223.206, paragraph (d)(10)(vii)
the period of May 6 through July 15, to Exports, Transportation. is added to read as follows:
make their modified leaders available Dated: February 23, 2007.
for inspection and tagging. Additionally, § 223.206 Exemptions to prohibitions
Samuel D. Rauch III, relating to sea turtles.
fishermen would be required to retain a Deputy Assistant Administrator for
letter that the leader is in compliance * * * * *
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
for the relevant period. Under existing (d) * * *
Fisheries Service.
regulations fishermen had to be familiar (10) * * *
For the reasons set forth in the (vii) Modified leader inspection
with the design requirements for the preamble, 50 CFR part 223 is proposed
modified leader; this knowledge program. Any fisherman planning to set
to be amended as follows: or fish with a modified pound net leader
continues to be required under the
proposed rule. In the event that a tagged PART 223—THREATENED MARINE in Pound Net Regulated Area I or Pound
leader is damaged or destroyed, AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES Net Regulated Area II at any time during
fishermen would be required to report the period from May 6 through July 15
the loss to NMFS personnel. To access * * * * * must make his/her leader available for
the inspection program and report lost 1. The authority citation for part 223 inspection and tagging by NMFS
or damaged tags, fishermen would need continues to read as follows: according to the following procedures.
access to a telephone. No new skills Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. At least 72 hours prior to deploying a
would be required for compliance. 742a et seq.; 31 U.S.C. 9701. modified pound net leader, the
This proposed rule does not 2. In § 223.205, paragraphs (b)(16) and fisherman, or his/her representative,
duplicate, overlap or conflict with other (b)(17) are redesignated as (b)(21) and must call NMFS at 757–414–0128
Federal rules. (b)(22), respectively, and paragraphs (b) between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. local
This proposed rule contains a (16) – (20) are added to read as follows: time and arrange for a mutually
collection-of-information requirement agreeable meeting date, time and place.
subject to review and approval by OMB § 223.205 Sea turtles. The fisherman must meet NMFS at such
under the Paperwork Reduction Act * * * * * location at the designated time and
(PRA). This requirement has been (16) Set, tend, or fail to remove a allow NMFS to examine his or her gear
submitted to OMB for approval. Public pound net leader in Pound Net to ensure the leader meets the definition
reporting burden for the modified Regulated Area I or Pound Net of a modified pound net leader. During
pound net leader certification program Regulated Area II during the time period the inspection, the fisherman must
is estimated to average a maximum of 2 from May 6 through July 15 that does inform NMFS of the specific location
and one half hours per fisherman (or 51 not meet the leader construction where his or her inspected pound net
hours for all Virginia pound net specifications described in 50 CFR leader will be set. NMFS will inspect
fishermen), including the time for 223.206(d)(10) and 50 CFR 222.102; the leader and, if it is determined to
reviewing instructions, searching (17) Set, tend, or haul a modified meet the definition of a modified pound
existing data sources, gathering and pound net leader in Pound Net net leader, will tag the modified pound
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS

maintaining the data needed, and Regulated Area I or Pound Net net leader with tamperproof tags.
completing and reviewing the collection Regulated Area II defined in 50 CFR Removing or tampering with any tag
of information. 222.102 and referenced in 50 CFR placed on the leader by NMFS is
Public comment is sought regarding: 223.206(d)(10) during the time period prohibited and voids the inspection. If
whether this proposed collection of from May 6 through July 15 unless that a tag is damaged, destroyed, or lost due
information is necessary for the proper leader has been inspected, approved, to any cause, the fisherman must call

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:56 Feb 28, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Proposed Rules 9301

NMFS at 757–414–0128 within 48 hours letter to the fisherman, and the within one year from the previous date
of discovery to report this incident. fisherman must retain that letter on of inspection.
After the modified pound net leader is board his/her vessel during pound net * * * * *
inspected and determined to meet the fishing activities. Modified pound net [FR Doc. E7–3630 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am]
regulatory definition, NMFS will issue a leaders must be inspected annually, BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:56 Feb 28, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1

Вам также может понравиться