Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
mixtures
B. A. Mir*1 and A. Sridharan2
At present, more than 150 million tonnes of fly ash is generated annually in India, posing serious
health and environmental problems. To control these problems, the most commonly used method is
addition of fly ash as a stabilizing agent in combination with soils. For the bulk utilization of fly ashes in
geotechnical applications such as embankments/dykes, as back fill material, as base material and in
water retaining structures either alone or with soil, the volume change behavior of soilfly ash mixture
forms an important consideration. Only few data are available concerning the volume change
behavior of clayey soilfly ash mixtures and require further investigations. In the present study, highcalcium (ASTM Class C-Neyveli fly ash (NFA)) and low-calcium (ASTM Class F-Badarpur fly ash
(BFA)) fly ashes in different proportions by weight (10, 20, 40, 60, and 80%) were added to a highly
expansive soil [known as Black Cotton (BC) soil from India] to evaluate the effect of fly ashes on the
volume change behavior of clayey soilsfly ash mixtures. Compacted clay-fly ash samples were
cured for 7 and 28 days and subjected to consolidation test under different pressures ranging from
50 kPa to 800 kPa. In this study, the void ratio, the compression index, swelling potential, coefficient
of consolidation, permeability, and preconsolidation pressure of clayey soilfly ash specimens were
investigated. The test results indicate a significant decrease in compressibility characteristics and
swell potential of the treated soils. It was seen that 20% high-calcium fly ash content is the optimum
quantity to improve the compressibility characteristics of clayey (BC) soil cured for 7 days against
60% for immediate tests. It is also observed that 10% of NFA is the optimum amount required to
minimize the swell potential compared to 40% of BFA. Thus, the main objective of the study was to
study the effect of fly ashes on the volume change behavior of fly ash treated clayey soil and bulk
utilization of industrial waste by-product without adversely affecting the environment.
Keywords: Compressibility, Clayey soils, Fly ash, Swell potential, Self-pozzolanic, Flocculation
International Journal of
Geotechnical Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Srinagar190 006, Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Indian National Science Academy, India
72
2014
VOL
NO
Fly ashes
In the present investigation, two fly ashes namely, BFA
(Class F from Badarpur thermal power station (UP),
2014
VOL
NO
73
Testing procedures
One-dimensional consolidation tests:
Immediate test series
Oven-dried soil samples were prepared as per standard
procedure (ASTM D421). For immediate test series, the
soilfly ash samples were prepared by compacting at
0?95cdmax (i.e., 95% of maximum Standard Proctor dry
unit weight) and corresponding water content on dry side
of optimum and immediately tested in a fixed ring
consolidometer using brass rings of 60 mm diameter and
20 mm height as per ASTM D2435. The height of
specimen after compaction is 15 mm (using 5 mm brass
spacer). The burette, the connecting tube, and the base of
the consolidation cell were de-aired by allowing water to
flow from the burette. The specimen was then assembled in
the consolidation cell. The chamber around the consolidation ring was filled with de-aired water. A seating pressure
of 6?25 kPa was applied on the specimen and maintained
for 24 hours. During this period, the specimen was
allowed to saturate by the capillary action of water from
the surrounding chamber and head of water of the burette.
The swelling of the specimens under nominal surcharge
can be obtained by allowing the specimen to swell freely
under nominal load of 6?25 kPa to reach its maximum
possible limit. After equilibrium was attained as indicated
by nearly constant readings in a vertical dial readings
Lime
In this study, commercially available hydrated lime was
used as an additive to BFA to make it at par with NFA in
terms of lime content.
All the tests were carried out as per the relevant standards.
The physical and chemical properties of materials used are
listed in Table 1 and compaction characteristics of clayey
soilfly ash mixtures are given in Table 2.
Experimental work
In this study, the additives content is defined by the ratio of
the weight of the additive to the dry weight of the natural
clayey soil (BC Soil) expressed as a percentage. The soil and
fly ash samples were mixed in the dry state and the various
soilfly ash mixes used for conducting the compaction tests
are given in Table 3. In the present paper, the soil was ovendried and passed through a 425-micron sieve before being
Table 1 Physical and chemical properties of materials used
Physical properties
Property
Particle size
Clay size (%)
Silt size (%)
Fine sand (%)
Coeff. of uniformity, Cu
Coeff. of curvature, Cc
Specific gravity
Atterberg limits
Liquid Limit (%)
Plastic Limit (%)
Plasticity Index
Shrinkage Limit (%)
Free swell ratio (%)
Swell pressure (kPa)
Std. Proctor Maximum dry
unit weight (c5rg), kN m23
OMC (%)
74
Chemical properties
CS*
BFA**
NFA***
63
27
10
2?71
03
87
10
6?3
1?1
2?18
05
85
10
1?4
0?9
2?64
84
25
59
8
65
280
14?4
50
NP$
36
0?75
10?6
40
NP$
38
1?2
12?6
38
33
28?6
2014
VOL
CS
SiO2
49?2
24
Al2O3
5?8
Fe2O3
0?7
TiO2
CaO
0?4
MgO
0?4
MnO
0?2
0?12
K2O
0?1
Na2O
LOI(900uC)
18?1
Clay mineral
Mont
Free Lime
*: CS Clayey soil
**: BFA Badarpur fly ash
***: NFA Neyveli fly ash
$ NP Non-plastic
# bd below detection
LOI loss on ignition
OMC: Optimum moisture content
NO
BFA
NFA
57?5
33
4?8
1?4
0?5
0?2
bd#
0?4
0?2
1?5
36?5
41
4?5
1?4
9?00
3?8
,0?1
0?1
0?4
3?5
3?2
CS soilzBFA (%)
cdmax kN m23
w (%)
CS soilzNFA (%)
cdmax kN m23
w (%)
100% BC soil
20 BFA*
40 BFA
60 BFA
80 BFA
100 BFA
100% BFA**
14?4
13?9
13?6
12?7
11?8
10?6
10?57
28?3
30?0
31?1
33?0
35?4
38?2
34?8
100% BC soil
10 NFA*
20 NFA
40 NFA
60 NFA
80 NFA
100 NFA
14?4
14?1
13?9
13?7
13?5
13?1
12?6
28?9
29?5
29?7
29?9
30?5
31?1
32?0
Clayey soil
(%) (G52?71)
Gmix*
Clayey soil
(%) (G52?71)
Gmix
Remarks
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
0
20#
40
60
80
100
100$
2?71
2?58
2?47
2?37
2?27
2?18
2?18
100
90
80
60
40
20
0
0
10
20
40
60
80
100
2?71
2?70
2?70
2?68
2?67
2?65
2?64
*For example, for clayey soil (G52?71)Badarpur fly ash (G52?18) ratio of 80:20 for total mass, M5100 g (80 g of soilz20 g of fly ash). The
specific gravity of this soilfly ash mixture is calculated as: Gmix5M/(VszVf) (soil particle density of mix); Vs5Vol. of soil sample580/
2?71(cc) and Vf5Vol. of fly ash520/2?18 (cc); and Gs5rs/rw, rs5Gs (rw51), V5M/rs5M/Gs, rs5M/V5soil particle density of mix, therefore,
Gmix5M/(VszVf); V5(VszVf)5 total volume of mixed sample.
Likewise, the specific gravity of other samples of soilfly ash mixtures is calculated in the same manner.
2014
VOL
NO
75
1 a elog p plot for clayey soilBadarpur y ash (BFA) mixes for immediate test series, b elog p plot for clayey soil
Neyveli y ash (NFA) mixes for immediate test series, c elog p plot for clayey soilNFA mixes for 7 days test series, d e
log p plot for clayey soilNFA mixes for 28 days test series
76
2014
VOL
NO
2 a Variation of Compression Index, Cc with pressure for Clayey soil (CS)Badarpur y ash (BFA) mixes for immediate test
series, b variation of Compression Index, Cc with pressure for CSNeyveli y ash (NFA) mixes for immediate test series, c
variation of Compression Index, Cc with pressure for CSNFA mixes for 7 days test series, and d variation of
Compression Index, Cc with pressure for CSNFA mixes for 28 days test series
2014
VOL
NO
77
78
2014
VOL
NO
0:24|m|h2av 2 {1
(m s )
c
(1)
aL
h1
log10
At
h2
(2)
2014
VOL
NO
79
5 ab Variation of Cv with pressure for clayey soily ash mixtures for immediate test series, cd variation of Cv with pressure for clayey soily ash mixtures for different curing periods (by RHM)
80
2014
VOL
NO
6 ab Variation of permeability with pressure for clayey soily ash mixes for immediate test series, cd variation of permeability with pressure for clayey soily ash mixes for 7 and 28 days test series
2014
VOL
NO
81
Conclusion
From the study of volume change behavior of soilfly ash
mixes, it can be concluded that:
1. Compression index appreciably decreases with the
addition of fly ash indicating improvement in compressibility of the composite sample due to the formation of
cementitious bonds. It is seen that 20% high-calcium fly
ash content is the optimum quantity to improve the
compressibility characteristics of clayey soil cured for
7 days against 60% for immediate tests.
2. Addition of fly ash to clayey soils significantly
reduces their swelling due to reduction of plastic fines of
clay by non-plastic fines of fly ash. Swell potential
decreases significantly as percentage of fly ash increases.
The use of NFA (class C) even in small percentage
produces significant changes (i.e., 10% class C fly ash is
more effective for reducing swelling characteristics compared to 40% of class F fly ash).
3. Neyveli fly ash (Class C) has higher void ratio than
BFA (Class F) for a given effective consolidation pressure.
However, for a given void ratio, the permeability of NFA
is less compared to that for BFA. This is because of the
less effective void space available for the flow of water.
The reduction in the effective void space is due to the
presence of free lime, which causes cementation in NFA.
4. Coefficient of consolidation of fly ash treated clays
increases with increase in percent fly ash. However, at
larger axial pressures, the effect of percentage of fly ash on
the coefficient of consolidation becomes less significant.
The high rate of consolidation of fly ashes is favorable for
its use as embankment and reclamation fills and other
applications. Rectangular hyperbola method is suitable
for finding the coefficient of consolidation.
5. With increase in percent fly ash, void ratio and
permeability of the composite samples increase. This
indicates that the addition of fly ash to fine-grained soils
makes it granular leading to higher coefficient of permeability. The plasticity of fine-grained soils is reduced and
workability increased.
6. The secondary cementitious products appear to be
deposited on or near the surfaces of the clay clusters,
which gives rise to a reduction in entrance pore diameter
with increase in particle size leading to reduced permeability over time as indicated in the permeability of 7 days
and 28 days of curing.
7. The coefficient of permeability is to be determined
directly from the falling head permeability test and not
back calculated from consolidation test results. Likewise,
Cv can be calculated from the equation:
8. Cv5k/(mvcw), where k is measured value from
permeability tests.
9. It is also observed that the addition of 8?5% lime does
not improve the behavior of BFA (class F fly ash) much
because of non-availability of reactive silica.
10. From this study it is also concluded that not only
can problematic soils be easily stabilized by bulk utilization of fly ash but fly ash can also be stabilized by adding
clay-like admixtures to reduce its permeability on need
basis.
82
2014
VOL
Acknowledgement
The investigation reported in this paper forms a part of the
research at the Indian Institute of Science by the first
author. The support and assistance given by the Institute
is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Abduljauwad, S. N. 1993. Treatment of calcareous expansive clays, in Fly
ash for soil improvement, (ed. K. D. Sharp), Vol. 36, 100115,
ASCE, GTS Pub, New York.
ASTM C618. 2012. Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or
Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. Annual book of
ASTM standards, Philadelphia, American Society for Testing and
Materials, www.astm.org.
ASTM D2435-96. 2011. Standard Test Methods for One-Dimensional
Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading.
Annual book of ASTM standards, Philadelphia, American Society
for Testing and Materials.
ASTM D421-98. 2007. Standard Practice for Dry Preparation of Soil
Samples for Particle-Size Analysis and Determination of Soil
Constants. Annual book of ASTM standards, Philadelphia,
American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM D4546-90. 2008. Standard Test Methods for One-Dimensional
Swell or Settlement Potential of Cohesive Soils. Annual book of
ASTM standards, Philadelphia, American Society for Testing and
Materials.
Basma, A. A. and Tuncer, E. R. 1991. Effect of lime on volume change and
compressibility of expansive clays, Transp. Res. Rec., 1295, 5261.
Bell, F. G. 1996. Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils, Eng. Geol.,
42, 223237.
Broderic, G. P. and Daniel, D. E. 1990. Stabilizing compacted clays
against chemical attack, J. Geotech. Eng., 116, (10), 15491567.
Chen, F. H. 1975. Foundations on expansive soils, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, Elsevier Science.
Cokca, E. 2001. Use of class C fly ash for the stabilization of an expansive
soil, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 127, (7), 568573.
Du, Y. J., Li, S. L. and Hayashi, S. 1999. Swelling-shrinkage properties
and soil improvement of compacted expansive soil. Ning-Lian
highway, China, Eng. Geol., 53, 351358.
EI-Rawi, M. N. and Awad, A. A. A. 1981. Permeability of lime stabilized
soils, J. Transp. Engg. Div., 107, (1), 2535.
Ghazali, F. M., Baghdadi, Z A. and Khan, A. M. 1991. Overconsolidated
behavior of phosphoric acid and lime-stabilized kaolin clay,
Transport. Res. Rec., 1295, 6269.
Glogowski, P. E., Kelly, J. M., McLaren, R. J. and Burns, D. L. 1992. Fly
ash design manual for road and site applications, Monroeville, Pa,
Rep. RP2422-2 Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute, GAI
Consultants.
Indraratna, B., Nutalaya, P., Koo, K. S. and Kuganenthira, N. 1991.
Engineering behavior of a low carbon, pozzolanic fly ash and its
potential as a construction fill, Can. Geotech. J., 28, 542555.
Jones, D. E. and Holtz, W. G. 1973. Expansive soils the hidden disaster,
Civ. Eng., 43, 4951.
Kaniraj, S. R. and Gayathri, V. 2004. Permeability and consolidation
characteristics of compacted fly ash, J. Energy Eng., 130, (1), 1843.
Kate, J. M. 2005. Strength and volume change behavior of expansive soils
treated with fly ash. Innovations in Grouting and Soil Improvement,
Geofrontiers 2005, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication 136, 115.
Kumar, V. 1996. Fly ash utilization: a mission mode approach. Ash ponds
and ash disposal systems, New Delhi, India, Narosa Publishing
House.
Locat, J., Berube, M. A. and Choquette, M. 1990. Laboratory
investigations on the lime stabilization of sensitive clays: shear
strength development, Can. Geotech. J., 27, (3), 294304.
NO
2014
VOL
NO
83