Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The following variables were identified based on the focus group discussions, in-depth
interviews and research questionnaire.
a.) Content of study material
b.) Ease of access
c.) Methods of assessment
d.) Doubt clearing sessions
e.) Cost effectiveness
f.) Brand Image of the e-tutorial
g.) General knowledge & information about current affairs
h.) Art & craft learning
i.) Ease of use (e-tutorial)
j.) Willingness to use e-tutorials
k.) Awareness about e-tutorials
l.) Extent to which e-learning is helpful in learning
m.) Extent to which it is helpful in teaching
n.) Preference for mode of learning
o.) Preference for additional educational support
p.) Influence of references/recommendations for selecting the additional educational
support
q.) Influence of references/recommendations for selecting the e-tutorial
r.) Access to computer or laptop at home
DATA ANALYSIS
Objective 1
To determine the customer attitude towards e-learning
I.
Affective
To determine what features distinguish people who are willing to use e-tutorial from those
who are not willing to use e-tutorial.
Key Variables Used
i.
Ease to Use
ii.
Doubt Clearing Session
iii.
Methods of Assessment
iv.
Content of study material
v.
Extent to which it is helpful in Learning
vi.
Heard about e-tutorial
vii.
Cost Effectiveness
Method Used
Discriminant Analysis
Discriminating Category
i.
Willing to use e-tutorial
ii.
Not willing to use e-tutorial
Findings
The difference in the score for
Methods of Assessment for the willing
group is 3.1538, whereas it is 0.8687
for the non-willing group. Similar results
are obtained for Doubt clearing and
Heard about e-
Ease of Use
Doubt clearing sessions
Methods of Assessment
Content of study material
Helpfulness in learning
Cost Effectiveness
Heard about e-
Heard about e-
Where,
Y = Discriminant Score
X1 = Ease to Use
X2 = Doubt Clearing Session
X3 = Methods of Assessment
X4 = Content
X5 = Learning
Heard about e-
II.
Behavioral
To determine the underlying factors which influence customers buying behavior
towards e-learning.
Key Variables Used
i.
Ease of Access
ii.
Doubt clearing sessions
iii.
Willingness to use
iv.
Helpfulness
v.
Expensive
vi.
Content of study material
vii.
Methods of assessment
viii.
Awareness
ix.
Access to computer or laptop at home
Methods Used
Factor Analysis
Findings
III.
Cognitive
To determine the awareness about e-tutorial among people in Manipal and Udupi
and their beliefs about e-tutorial.
Key Variables Used
i.
Ease of Use
ii.
The extent to which e-tutorial is helpful in learning
iii.
The extent to which e-tutorial is helpful in teaching
Method Used
Descriptive Analysis
Findings
EASE OF USE
30
20
STUDENTS
PARENTS
TEACHERS
10
0
Very Easy
Easy
Moderate
HELPFUL IN LEARNING
25
20
15
10
5
0
Students
Parents/Guardians
Teachers/Tutors
Majority of the student respondents found e-tutorial extremely helpful for learning.
However parents were of the opinion that e-tutorial only moderately helped their children in
learning. Teachers find e-tutorial as very helpful for students learning.
E-tutorial helpful in teaching
Not Helpful; 7%
Very Helpful; 29%
Extremely Helpful; 7%
Little Helpful; 21%
Moderately Helpful; 36%
Parents and teachers found e-tutorial moderately helpful in teaching their children/students.
Objective 2
To determine the features sought by target clients in e-tutorial
Key Variables Used
i.
Ease of access
ii.
Content of study material
iii.
Methods of assessment
iv.
Cost effectiveness
v.
Doubt clearing sessions
vi.
Knowledge about current affairs & GK
vii.
Brand image
viii.
Art & Craft learning
Method Used
Descriptive Analysis
Findings
The Content of the study material and Cost effectiveness of e-tutorial are the most
preferred features in e-tutorial. Methods of assessment and Knowledge about current
affairs & GK are also the preferred features in e-tutorial.
Objective 3
To identify the attitude of
target clients towards
LearnNext
Key Variables Used
i.
Awareness about LearnNext (COGNITIVE)
ii.
Brand-wise e-tutorial users (BEHAVIORAL)
iii.
Ratings of features of LearnNext (AFFECTIVE)
Method Used
Descriptive Analysis
20%
Heard about LearnNext
80%
41%
59%
Findings
The awareness about LearnNext among respondents seems to be very low. Only 20% of the
respondents and 41% of potential clients have awareness about LearnNext. (Potential
clients are those who have awareness of e-tutorial and hence can be potential buyers of an
e-tutorial.)
NUMBER OF USERS
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Most of the respondents used Edurite or Educomp. This could be attributed to the lack of
awareness about LearnNext among respondents.
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
0
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Bad
Very Bad
Worst
The users of LearnNext find it Excellent in technique of teaching, exposure to mock tests,
content of study material and cost effectiveness. The users find LearnNext highly
economical. However LearnNext has been ranked as Bad in providing knowledge about
current affairs & GK.
Other Findings
SOURCES OF REFERENCE
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Students
Parents/Guardians
Institute
Friends/Relatives
Brand
Ads/Social Media
Teachers/Tutors
Self Research
38%
62%
Use e-tutorial
The users of e-tutorial among potential clients is only 38%. (Potential clients are those who
have awareness about e-tutorial but have not used e-tutorial as yet and hence can be
potential buyers.)
RESULTS
Methods of assessment is the major factor which determines the willingness to use
e-tutorial.
The other factors which determine the willingness to use e-tutorial are ease of use,
doubt clearing sessions, content of study material and the extent to which it is helpful
in learning.
Customer Service, Cost Effectiveness, Awareness about e-tutorial and Access to
computer or laptop at home are the major factors which influence the consumer
techniques of teaching.
LearnNext was poorly rated in terms of providing knowledge on current affairs and
GK.
While most of the students neither opt for nor feel the need for additional educational
support, the most preferred mode of education has been found to be Chalk &
Board.
RECOMMENDATIONS
There is a lot of scope for e-tutorial in Manipal & Udupi because smart classes are
being used and recommended schools like Christ School & Trinity Central School.
In order to capture students preferring self-study, LearnNext should market and
project itself as being a complement to self-study.
Increasing awareness about e-tutorial is the primary step as people are still unaware
of e-tutorials.
Relatives, friends & teachers are the major sources of references for additional
educational support for both students and parents.
LearnNext should make their product more cost effective than its competitors like
Edurite and Educomp & cater to the features sought for by the end users, especially
information on current affairs and GK.
Build up an online library of syllabus-related books on the portal.
As per the comments received from the respondents, Learn Next should market
themselves and increase their visibility on social media like Facebook, Twitter, etc.
As per our personal experience with LearnNext, we would like to recommend them to
make their doubt clearing sessions more effective and quick.
The respondents have suggested that the trial version should be made available for
at least a month.
The major USP for LearnNext is that it can be used offline as well. Hence it will curb
additional costs of internet which would otherwise have to be borne by the
consumers.