64244 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
211 / Wednesday, November 1, 2006 / Notices
2006, which is hereby adopted by this
notice. A list of the issues which the
respondent raised and to which we have
responded is in the Decision Memo and
attached to this notice as an Appendix.
The Decision Memo, which is a public
document, is on file in the Central
Records Unit, main Commerce building,
Room B–099, and is accessible on the
Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/
index.html. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision Memo
are identical in content.
Changes from the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments we received from Asahi, we
find that Asahi’s two home–market
channels of distribution constitute one
level of trade. Our analysis on the level
of trade is discussed in detail in the
Decision Memo. We made no other
changes to our analysis.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of our review, we
determine that a margin of 0.00 percent
exists for Asahi for the period August 1,
2004, through July 31, 2005.
Assessment Rate
The Department will determine and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries. We intend to
issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP within 15
days of publication of these final results
of review. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), we have calculated an
importer–specific assessment rate of
0.00 percent. We will direct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries at this
rate. See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Notice of Policy
Concerning Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)
(Assessment–Policy Notice). This
clarification will apply to entries of
subject merchandise during the period
of review produced by Asahi for which
Asahi did not know that the
merchandise it sold to an intermediary
(e.g., a reseller, trading company, or
exporter) was destined for the United
States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the 91.74 percent all–others
rate if there is no rate for the
intermediary involved in the
transaction. See the Assessment–Policy
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Notice for a full discussion of this
clarification.
Cash–Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:36 Oct 31, 2006 Jkt 211001
this notice of final results of the
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication, consistent with section
751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) the cash–deposit
rate for Asahi will be 0.00 percent; (2)
for previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash–
deposit rate will continue to be the
company–specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original less–than-fair–
value (LTFV) investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash–deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; (4) if neither the
exporter nor the producer is a firm
covered in this review, a prior review,
or the LTFV investigation, the cash–
deposit rate shall be 91.74 percent, the
all–others rate established in the LTFV
investigation. See Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Granular
Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From
Japan, 53 FR 25191 (July 5, 1988). These
deposit requirements shall remain in
effect until publication of the final
results of the next administrative
review.
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during the review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01NON1.SGM
Dated: October 23, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Acting Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
Appendix
Comments and Responses
Level of Trade
[FR Doc. E6–18405 Filed 10–31–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–337–806]
Certain Individually Quick Frozen Red
Raspberries from Chile: Extension of
the Time Limit for the Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yasmin Bordas or Brandon Farlander,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–3813 or (202) 482–
0182, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Statutory Time Limits
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department of Commerce (the
Department) to complete the final
results of an administrative review
within 120 days after the date on which
the preliminary results are published.
However, if it is not practicable to
complete the review within this time
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act
allows the Department to extend the
time limit for the final results to 180
days from the date of publication of the
preliminary results.
Background
On August 29, 2005, the Department
published a notice of initiation of
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
individually quick frozen red
raspberries from Chile, covering the
period July 1, 2004, through June 30,
2005. See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in
Part, 70 FR 51009 (August 29, 2005). On
August 8, 2006, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
01NON1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 1, 2006 / Notices
antidumping duty administrative
review. See Notice of Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, Notice of Intent
to Revoke in Part: Individually Quick
Frozen Red Raspberries from Chile, 71
FR 45000 (August 8, 2006).
Extension of Time Limits for Final
Results
The Department requires additional
time to verify the cost information
submitted by a respondent in this
administrative review. Moreover, the
Department requires additional time to
analyze complex cost issues relating to
direct material purchases. Thus, it is not
practicable to complete this review
within the original time limit (i.e.,
December 6, 2006). Therefore, the
Department is extending the time limit
for completion of the final results of this
administrative review until no later than
February 4, 2007, which is 180 days
from the date of publication of the
preliminary results. However, February
4 falls on Sunday, and it is the
Department’s long–standing practice to
issue a determination the next business
day when the statutory deadline falls on
a weekend, federal holiday, or any other
day when the Department is closed. See
Notice of Clarification: Application of
‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for
Administrative Determination Deadlines
Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As
Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
Accordingly, the deadline for
completion of the final results is
February 5, 2007.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 25, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–18406 Filed 10–31–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–809]
Notice of Extension of Time Limit for
the Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Stainless Steel Flanges From
India
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Dates:
November 1, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:36 Oct 31, 2006 Jkt 211001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2924 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 9, 1994, the Department
published the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel flanges from India. See
Amended Final Determination and
Antidumping Duty Order; Certain
Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from
India, 59 FR 5994 (February 9, 1994).
On February 28, 2006, we received
requests for an administrative review for
the period February 1, 2005, through
January 31, 2006, from Echjay Forgings
Pvt. Ltd. (Echjay) and Shree Ganesh
Forgings, Ltd. (Shree Ganesh). We also
received requests for a new shipper
review and, failing that, an
administrative review, from Kunj
Forgings Pvt. Ltd. (Kunj), Micro Forge
(India) Ltd. (Micro), Pradeep Metals
Limited (Pradeep), and Rollwell Forge,
Ltd. (Rollwell). On April 5, 2006, we
initiated administrative reviews of the
six companies. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Deferral of
Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 17077
(April 5, 2006).1 The preliminary results
of the administrative review are
currently due no later than October 31,
2006.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
The Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), at section 351(a)(3)(A),
provides that the Department will issue
the preliminary results of an
administrative review of an
antidumping duty order within 245
days after the last day of the anniversary
month of the date of publication of the
order. The Act provides further that if
the Department determines that it is not
practicable to complete the review
within this time period, the Department
may extend the 245-day period to 365
days.
1 On April 6, 2006, the Department published a
notice initiating new shipper reviews of Kunj,
Micro, Pradeep, and Rollwell. See Stainless Steel
Flanges from India: Notice of Initiation of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews, 71 FR
17439 (April 6, 2006). On September 29, 2006, we
rescinded the new shipper reviews with respect to
Micro, Pradeep, and Rollwell. See Certain Forged
Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Notice of Partial
Rescission of New Shipper Reviews, 71 FR 57468
(September 29, 2006).
PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01NON1.SGM
64245
The Department has determined that
it is not practicable to complete the
preliminary results by the current 245-
day deadline of October 31, 2006.
Rollwell has reported several new
model types of flanges that the
Department has not analyzed in
previous segments of this proceeding.
We require additional time to make a
thorough analysis of these model types
and to determine appropriate model
match weighting criteria. Therefore, in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the
Department is extending the time limit
for the preliminary results by 120 days
to February 28, 2007.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 25, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–18407 Filed 10–31–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Marine Protected Areas Federal
Advisory Committee
AGENCY:National Ocean Service,
NOAA, Department of Commerce.
ACTION:Extension of deadline for
nominations for the Marine Protected
Areas Federal Advisory Committee.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
published a notice in the Federal
Register on September 26, 2006 (71 FR
45107) seeking nominations for
membership on the Marine Protected
Areas Federal Advisory Committee
(Committee). The deadline for
nominations by qualified persons to the
Committee is hereby extended.
DATES:The extended deadline for
nominations to the Committee is
November 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Nominations should be sent
to Lauren Wenzel, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, National
marine Protected Areas Center, 1305
East West Highway, Station #12227,
Silver Spring, MD 20910. E-mail:
Lauren.wenzel@noaa.gov. E-mail
nominations are acceptable.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Refer to the Federal Register notice of
September 26, 2006, or contact Lauren
Wenzel, (301) 713–3100 x136,
Lauren.wenzel@noaa.gov.
01NON1