this document downloaded from
vulcanhammer.net
Since 1997, your complete online resource for information
geotecnical engineering and
deep foundations:
The Wave Equation Page for
Piling
The historical site for Vulcan
Iron Works Inc.
Online books on all aspects
of soil mechanics, foundations and marine construction
Free general engineering
and geotechnical software
And much more...
Terms and
Conditions
of Use:
All of the information, data and computer software
(information) presented on this web site is for
general information only. While every effort will be
made to insure its accuracy, this information should
not be used or relied on for any specific application without independent, competent professional
examination and verification of its accuracy,
suitability and applicability by a licensed professional. Anyone making use of this information
does so at his or her own risk and assumes
any and all liability resulting from such use.
The entire risk as to quality or usability
of the information contained within
is with the reader. In no event will
this web page or webmaster be held
liable, nor does this web page or
its webmaster provide insurance
against liability, for any damages
including lost profits, lost savings or
any other incidental or consequential
damages arising from the use or
inability to use the information
contained within.
This site is not an official site of
PrenticeHall, Pile Buck, the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga,
Vulcan Foundation Equipment or
Vulcan Iron Works Inc. (Tennessee
Corporation). All references to
sources of software, equipment,
parts, service or repairs do not
constitute an endorsement
Visit our
companion site
http://www.vulcanhammer.org
CONTRACT REPORT NO. 3115
VERTICAL MOTION OF
RIGID FOOTINGS
by
J. Lysmer
June 1965
Sponsored by
Defense Atomic Support Agency
NWER Subtask 13.009
Conducted for
U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Vicksburg, Mississippi
Under
Contract No. DA22079eng340
by
University of Michigan
ORA Project 05366
ARMYMRC VICKSBURG. MISS
// f
o
? ,.
FOREWORD
The investigation covered in the dissertation of Mr. J.
Lysmer includes a theoretical solution for a rigid footing,
resting on an elastic halfspace, which is subjected to
steadystate vertical oscillation. It is shown how this
steadystate solution can be used to describe the response
of the footing to a transient pulsetype vertical loading.
After establishing the theoretical solution, and evaluating the approximations required for its development, it
is further demonstrated that the theory permits evaluation
of quantities which may represent spring constants and damping factors for use in the usual theory for vertical motion
of a dampedonedegreeof freedom system. The agreement between the simple theory and elastic halfspace theory is well
within the limit required for engineering solutions.
The results of the study provide information from which
the elastic dynamic response of rigid footings subjected to
transient vertical loads may be evaluated. By taking advantage of such standard procedures as the phaseplane method,
the dynamic response of footings may still be estimated even
if the stresses in the soil extend into the inelastic range.
A detailed discussion of the application of this method to
inelastic settlements of vertically loaded footings will be
presented in a subsequent report.
Finally, the theoretical developments included in this
report for vertical oscillations may serve as a guide to
develop similar theoretical evaluations of the dynamic response of rigid footings in other uncoupled modes of oscillation.
F. E. Richart, Jr,
ill
46667
This report was also a dissertation submitted
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of
Michigan, 1965.
TA7 W34c
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD, by F. E. Richart, Jr
ill
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
ix
LIST OF SYMBOLS
xi
Chapter
I.
II.
INTRODUCTION
STEADY STATE MOTION
General Theory
Simple Damped Oscillator
Elastic HalfSpace with Uniform Loading . 14
Rigid Circular Footing
Low Frequencies ,
17
. 20
High Frequencies
Intermediate Frequencies
26
. 27
Pressure Distribution
33
Displacements of the Free Surface . . . .
37
Response Spectra.
38
Simplified Analog
42
Practical Formulas
46
Free Vibrations
47
RotatingMass Systems
48
Appendix
Page
II.
10?
COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR IMPULSIVE LOADING
Main Program
,. . .
109
Subroutine for the Displacement Function . . .
114
Table of F
115
and
Output for Trapezoidal Pulse
116
Output for Test No. T3
123
REFERENCES
129
DISTRIBUTION LIST.
131
vii
LIST OP ILLUSTRATIONS
Page
Figure
1.
System S
2.
Analog for System S
3.
System S + m
4.
System S
5
Displacement Function for Simple Damped
Oscillator
6.
System S + m
7
SteadyState Spectra for Simple Damped
Oscillator
11
8.
Uniformly Loaded Elastic Half Space
13
14
9.
Analog for Half Space
16
10.
FootingSoil System
17
11.
Bycroft's Displacement Function
12.
The Displacement Function F
23
24
13.
14.
The Functions k, and c
25
Variation of 1/c
27
15.
16.
1718.
19.
with Poisson's Ratio
Ring System
29
Displacement Function for Massless
FootingSoil System
33
The Functions k
Ratio = 1/3
and c
for Poisson's
Pressure Distribution for Case: ao  1
Surface Displacements for the Case:
= 1/3
ix
35
36
39
Chapter
III.
Page
TRANSIENT MOTION
54
Numerical Method
54
The Integers N and ,j
58
Trapezoidal Pulse
,.
Triangular Pulse
6l
65
f ,/'
f
IV.
COMPARISON WITH TEST RESULTS
68
Determination of Soil Properties. . . . . . .
68
SteadyState Tests
71
.'
Impact Tests
V.
77
CONCLUSION
,.
81
Appendix
I.
REISSNER'S DISPLACEMENT FUNCTION
84
Function Definitions
85
Separation of the Real and Imaginary Parts . .
88
Calculation of XQ and f'(xQ)
90
Asymptotic Expression for v(x) . . . . . . . .
90
Determination of K and R
93
Formulas for the Calculation of g, and g . . . 100
The Static Case
102
Numerical Calculations
104
TA7 W34c
VI
Figure
20.
SteadyState Spectra for FootingSoil
System
4l
The Relative Difference between the
Spectra of the HalfSpace Model and the
Simplified Analog
45
22.
RotatingMass System
48
23.
RotatingMass Spectra for Simple
Damped Oscillator
49
RotatingMass Spectra for FootingSoil
System
53
Typical Pulse Train
55
26a.
Typical Pulse Shape Functions
55
26b.
Typical Pulse Shape Functions
55
27.
Trapezoidal Pulse
62
28.
Response Curves for Trapezoidal Pulse
63
29.
Triangular Pulse
65
30.
Displacement Spectrum for Triangular
Pulse
66
31.
Special Footing, from Chae (7)
73
32.
Experimental Values for F^ by Chae (7)
75
33.
Experimental Values for F^, by Chae (7)
76
34.
Test Ml, by Drnevich, Hall and Richart (8)
79
35
Test T3, by Drnevich, Hall and Richart (8)
80
36.
The Real Part of Reissner's Surface
Displacement Function
105
37.
The Imaginary Part of Reissner's Surface
Displacement Function
106
21.
24.
25.
TA7W34C
Page
I
LIST OP SYMBOLS
Amplitude of displacement, Eq. 33
res
Initial amplitude of displacement, Eq. 134
Maximum displacement (at resonance) for constant
force excitation,, Eq. 94
Mass ratio for footingsoil system, Eq. 74
Mass ratio for simple damped oscillator, Eq. 24
Frequency dependent coefficient of viscous damping, Pig. 2
Magnification factor for some given pulse shape,
Eq. 153
Displacement spectrum for some given pulse shape,
Eq. 15^
E
P
Constrained elastic modulus (no side contraction)
of elastic half space, Eq. 30
max
Complex displacement function for system S, Eq. 2
In particular a "massless" soilfooting system,
Eq. 53
Real part of F
F,
Imaginary part of F
Complex displacement function for System S + m,
Eq. 8
1
P
Real part of F
Imaginary part of F~
Shear modulus for elastic halfspace, Fig. 8
I.
Integral, Eq. 202
Integral, Eq. 203
xi
11
I
LIST OF SYMBOLS (Continued)
Jo
Zero order Bessel function of the first kind
First order Bessel function of the first kind
Jn
The n
Frequencydependent spring constant, Fig. 2
Cutoff value for x, Eq. 179
Particular cutoff value, Eq. 206
Particular cutoff value, Eq. 216
Magnification factor for constant force system,
p. 8
term of a series of integrals, Eq. 207
Magnification factor for rotating mass system,
Eq. 105
Number of highest order term in Fourier Series,
Eq. 121
Large integer, Eq. 236
Large integer, Eq. 206
2
0
Large integer, Eq. 216
Name of reference point, Fig. 1
P(t)
Vertical force acting on system S, positive
when downwards, Fig. 1
P(x)
Auxiliary polynomial, Eq. 168
po
Amplitude of harmonic force acting on system S,
Eq. 1. In particular the reaction between m and
Vertical force acting on system S + m, positive
when downwards, Fig. 3
Amplitude of force acting on system S +m, Eq. 7
The peak value of the pulse shown in Fig. 25
Amplitude of exciting force for unit frequency
ratio, Eq. 103 and Eq. 112
Residual after cutting off the integral at x = K,
Eq. 180
TA7 W34c
xii
LIST OP SYMBOLS (Continued)
R(t)
Soil reaction in the interface between footing and
soil including the effect of gravity, p. 82
Name of a general elastic system, Fig. 1
S + m
Name of the elastic system formed by adding a
mass m to system S, Pig. 3
Period of free motion for elastic system, Eq. 132
Velocity of Pwaves in the elastic half space,
Eq. 32
Velocity of Rayleigh surface waves in the elastic
half space, p. 70
P
R
Velocity of Swaves in the elastic half space,
Eq. 41
w
wtotal
Weight of Footing, Eq. 88
The sum of the static and the rotating masses of
a rotatingmass system, Eq. 110
Distance ratio, Eq. 51
a
o
Frequency ratio for footingsoil system, Eq. 42
Frequency ratio for simple damped oscillator,
Eq. 21
The smallest of the values a, a ,
o
a a
, Eq. 225
Distance or frequency ratio corresponding to the
radius r^3 Eq. 63
Frequency ratio for the n ' term of the Fourier
series for displacements, Eq. 127
Mass ratio used by other authors, Eq. 74
Magnification factor for the n
term of the Fourier
series for displacements, Eq. 126
bes(x)
Auxiliary function, Eq. 162
Coefficient of viscous damping for simple damped
oscillator, Fig. 4. In particular the simplified
analog for the footingsoil system, Eq. 85
xiii
I
LIST OF SYMBOLS
(Continued)
Dimensionless damping coefficient, Eq. 46
Coefficient, Eq. 194
Coefficient, Eq. 195
Coefficient, Eq. 196
C
Coefficient, Eq. 198
Coefficient, Eq. 199
Amplitude of n
term in the Fourier series for
the pulse train, Eq. 121
n
Oo
Constant defined by Eq. 56
Influence coefficient expressing the displacement
of a point j due to a uniform loading on the m'th
ring, Eq. 65
Duration of pulse, Fig. 25
den'(x]
Derivative of the denominator of w(x), Eq. 171
= 2.7183 = Base of natural logarithms, Eq. 1
Complex displacement function used by Bycroft (2)
a.o., Eq. 52
Real part of f
Imaginary part of f
Rayleigh's function, Eq. 58
f*(x)
Auxiliary function, Eq. 160
f**(x)
Auxiliary polynomial, Eq. 161
g
g
Acceleration of gravity = 386.4 in/sec , Eq. 245
Complex surface displacement function, Eq. 50
Real part of g, Eq. 176
Imaginary part of g, Eq. 176
Specific value of Reissner's surface displacement
function expressing the displacement of point j
caused by a uniform harmonic loading over a circular area of radius r , Eq. 62
TA7 W34.
xiv
LIST OF SYMBOLS (Continued)
h(x)
Auxiliary function, Eq. 169
Imaginary unit, Eq. 1
Summation index, Eq. 130
Index referring to a surface point of the elastic
half space, Fig. 15
Integer controlling the time interval between the
pulses of the pulse train shown in Fig. 25
Spring constant, Eq. 2
k,
Dimensionless spring constant, Eq. 46
Eccentricity of rotating mass, Fig. 22
Mass, Fig. 3.
Fig. 10
Index denoting a particular member of the ring
system or a point on surface of the half space,
Fig. 15
Number of intervals in piecewise linear pulse,
Fig. 26b
Exponent, Eq. 202
Rotating mass, Fig. 22
Total number of rings in the ring system, Fig. 15
General summation index, Eq. 204
num'(x)
Derivative of the numerator of w(x), Eq. 171
i ~n)
N
o(x
In particular mass of footing,
A quantity which vanishes faster than x
goes to infinity.
n
as x
Vertical surface loading on elastic halfspace,
positive when downwards. Fig. 8
Amplitude of uniform harmonic surface loading on
elastic half space, Fig. 8
Complex, dimensionless pressure coefficient, Eq.13
Real part of q
of a, Eq. 72
treated like a continuous function
xv
LIST OF SYMBOLS (Continued)
Imaginary equivalent of q , Eq. 72
Horizontal distance from center of footing, Fig.10
ro
Radius of footing,, Fig. 10
Largest radius of m
' ring,, Fig. 15
Largest radius of ring system., equivalent to r ,
Fig. 15
r(x)
Auxiliary function, Eq, 163
Ratio between the velocities of Swaves and Pwave
in the elastic half space, Eq. 31
Time, Eq. 1
Time required to reduce the amplitude of vibration
to a fraction ^ of it's initial value, Eq. 134
t(x)
Auxiliary function, Eq. 164
Dummy variable in integration, Eq. 124
u(x)
Auxiliary function, Eq. 165
v(x)
Auxiliary function, Eq. 166
w(x)
Auxiliary function, Eq. l6'7
Vertical displacement of an interior point of the
elastic half space, positive when downwards, Fig.
Independent variable in integrations etc., Eq. 57
and Appendix I
0
Ratio between the velocity of shear waves and the
velocity of Rayleigh waves, Eq. 58
Maximum displacement during the n ' free oscillation of a damped system, Eq. 99
n l approximation to x
process, Eq. 182
yn
in a Newton iteration
Ordinate of piecewise linear pulse, Fig. 26b
Depth below surface of elastic half space. Fig. 8
TA7 W34
xvi
LIST OF SYMBOLS (Continued)
Coefficient, Eq. 202
^n
fi
Fourier coefficient, Eq. 124
Coefficient, Eq. 202
Fourier coefficient, Eq. 124
Unit weight of soil (elastic halfspace), Eq.88
Vertical displacement, positive when downwards,
Fig. 1
= d 6 /dt = Velocity, Eq. 3
= d26 /dt2 = Acceleration, Eq. 9
Total vertical displacement of point j, Eq. 64
Vertical displacement of point j due to the loading on the mth ring, Eq. 6l
Largest absolute displacement
>/
Astatic
Logarithmic decrement, Eq. 99
Static displacement under the load Q
Small constant used to control the error made by
using a pulse train instead of a single pulse.
Controls the distance between the individual
pulses, Eq. 135
Small constant used to control the error made by
cutting off the Fourier series at the n^h term,
Eq. 140
Wave length of Swaves in the elastic halfspace,
Eq. 42
Poisson's ratio for elastic halfspace, Fig. 8
Dimensionless duration of pulse, Eq. 152
3.1416
Mass density of elastic halfspace
Tensile stress on a horizontal plane of the
elastic halfspace, Eq. 34
evil
LIST OF SYMBOLS (Continued)
Dimensionless time, Eq. 151
Phase shift between displacement and exciting
force, Eq. 16
Phase shift between the n
term of the Fourier
series for displacement and the corresponding
term in the series for exciting force, Eq. 128
Phase of the n
term of the Fourier series for
the pulse train, Eq. 121
Angular frequency of steady state motion, Eq. 1
Of
Natural damped frequency for a simple oscillator,
Eq. 97
'res*
Resonance frequency for constant force excitation,
Eq. 93
Allowable error, Eq. 23^
Upper limits for error, Eqs. 213, 215, 218, 223,
225, 229 and 231
Pulse shape function, Fig. 26
TA7V
xviii
I.
INTRODUCTION
It is the objective of this work to describe the dynamic
behavior of footings and to develop practical methods for
dynamic analysis.
The investigations are limited to the
simple case of a rigid circular footing resting on a plane
soil surface and excited by a vertical timedependent force
in the axis of symmetry.
In order to arrive at a model which can be analysed
mathematically it is assumed that the subsoil can be considered as a perfectly elastic, isotropic and homogeneous halfspace and that only normal stresses are transferred at the
interface between footing and soil.
Halfspace models have been used by several investigators, notably Reissner (l) who, in 1936, developed a method
for finding the steadystate surface displacements of an
elastic half space for any given surface pressure distribution
with axial symmetry.
Through the work of other investigators,
such as Sung (2), Bycroft (3) and Hsieh (4), the art has
since been developed to the point where it is possible to
calculate the steady state response of a rigid footingsoil
system in the low frequency range.
Fortunately, this range
includes the operating frequencies of most machinery and the
above solutions are therefore useful for many practical purposes.
This was clearly shown in a paper by Richart (5)j
who also considered the rocking and sliding modes of vibration.
In the present work it is shown how the frequency range
can be extended to include all frequencies of steadystate
motion and also how this complete steady state solution can
be used to calculate the transient response caused by an
arbitrary pulse loading.
The analytical solutions compare
well with test results by Fry (6), Chae (?). and Drnevichj
Hall and Richart
(8).
The above system differs from most classical dynamic
systems in that it is of infinite dimensions.
This geomet
rical peculiarity causes an apparent loss of energy by wave
propagation into the half space.
It will be shown in this
work that the effect of the energy loss is comparable to that
of the dashpot in a simple damped oscillator.
This observa
tion has led the author to the adoption of a simplified
springdashpot analog for practical calculations.
The new
analog differs from previously suggested analogs in that its
components
(mass,, dashpot,, spring) are independent of the
frequency of the exciting force.
The analog can therefore
be used to predict the response to dynamic pulses of arbitrary shape by means of the classical methods for a damped
oscillator (phaseplane methods,, numerical integrations, etc.
TA7 W3.
II.
STEADYSTATE MOTION
General Theory
Before focusing the attention on the elastic halfspace
model it is appropriate to study a larger class of dynamic
systems.
Consider a linear dynamic system S which is excited by
a periodic vertical force P(t) of frequency U)
P
o
and amplitude
That is:
(1)
Furthermore, let it be assumed
that P attacks at a point 0
which is such that the dis:
placement <S of point 0 is
vertical at all times.
The
class of dynamic systems thus
Fig. 1
System S
defined clearly includes all
systems which are axially symmetric about a vertical axis
through 0, and the systems which will be considered in the
following are of this type.
The system S may or may not exhibit viscous damping and
I
1
I
I
I
it may be of finite or infinite dimensions.
In the case of steadystate motion it is known that all
forces and displacements are harmonic with the circular frequency UJ>
ing force.
and proportional to the amplitude P
of the excit
The displacement <S can therefore be written in
the form:
Fe*
(2)
where k is a quantity having the dimension force/length and
P is a dimensionless function.
The quantity k will be called the spring constant and
can usually be put equal to the static spring constant of
the system S.
There are however members of the above class
of systems for which this is not possible (i.e., if S consists of just a dashpot) and in this case a different choice
must be made.
The timeindependent, complex function F  P
+ 1P0
JL
is in general a function of the frequency 60
erties of the system S.
and the prop
It will, in the following, be re
ferred to as the displacement function*for the system S.
It should be noted that if k is the static spring constant then we must have P = F, = 1 for Cu
~ 00
FV
The displacement function is proportional to the quantity
compliance used by authors favoring electromechanical
analogies.
It is of interest to investigate if there exists a
simple damped oscillator which as far as the displacement
O is concerned, can be used
.
as an analog for the systera:.:S,.
In particular we are interested in a massless system of the
type shown in Fig. 2.
This
system has the equation of
motion:
Y/7777/777////,
(3)
Fig. 2
Analog for
System S
where the system parameters 0
and K are real.
By substitution of Eq. 2 into Eq. 3 we find:
KF*
LOJ
and separation of the real and imaginary parts gives the following linear equations:
= K
(5)
EK  o
which have the solution
K =
1
(6)
These expressions show that it is indeed possible to determine suitable parameters C and K if one allows them to be
functions of the frequency
CO of the exciting force.
Next consider the dynamic
itut
system S + m, which is formed
by supplementing the system
S by a rigid mass m at point
0.
Suppose this new system
is excited by a vertical
harmonic force:
(7)
Q =
Fig. 3
System S + m
acting on the added mass m.
Then this new system will be
long to the class defined above and there will therefore
exist a displacement function F = F, + 1F? such that the
displacement Q of the mass m (and hence of the point 0)
can be written in the form:
i  ^r^1
(8)
A connection between F and F can be found by introducing the reaction P acting on m (and the system S) at point 0.
This force is related to the displacement 6 through Eq. 2,
and it must also satisfy the equation of motion for the
mass m.
TA7
Using the sign rule indicated in Fig. 3, this equa
tion of motion is:
':
/)
iujt
6  ue
 re
C9)
Differentiation of Eq. 2 and Eq. 8 gives
p p p*I cut
do)
f f)
(11)
which, in connection with Eq. 9 yields:
P 
(12)
_ (DUd p~
and
mou*
(13)
k
The displacement of point 0 in system S + m is consequently by Eq. 8:
o>
k
Fe
/ L
This important formula expresses the steadystate solution to the system S + m in terms of the solution to the
simpler system S.
Its physical importance is best seen if
the real part is separated.
This will yield the solution to
the case when the exciting force is:
(J5)
Q  Q cos cat
Performing the process of separation we find the real displacement :
F,
4,1
\j
\J
/\
2
4
'f/a/'
^ #
cos fat*<p) (16)
rn Cc
^
+ [ k 'VI
4J
where the phase shift is:
 ^/?
r~
W+
(17)
The square root appearing in Eq. 16 will be called the magnification factor and will be denoted hereafter by the symbol
M.
It is equal to the absolute value of P.
Simple Damped Oscillator
The use of the theory developed above is clearly illustrated by the following simple
example.
~
0 ~~\
^
^
C
Consider the mass
less damped system S shown in
Pig. 4. This system clearly
belongs to the class of dynamic systems covered by the
theory, and it will therefore
TA7 W3.
Fig. 4
System S
have a steadystate solutioncf
i.
ct
O
CD
O
0)
O
a
QJ
3
V
ro
ex
H
cn
MO
c^
CD
H0)
eo
o
ii
33
O
D
O
c
a>
n>
ID
ro
&
Displacement Function F
bo
10
the form:
U8)
k
The equation of motion for point 0 is
Re ieut
(19)
which after substitution of Eq. 18 yields the following displacement function:
F =
1+ L a
where
ac. =
(21)
is a dimensionless number which will be called the frequency
ratio for the damped oscillator.
Separation of the real and imaginary parts of Eq. 20
gives:
1
(22)
f7
11
These two functions are shown in Fig. 5 and play an important role in the subsequent sections.
Note that substitution
of Eq. 22 into Eq. 6 gives the expected result:
C = c = constant and K = k = constant, and that the displacement function F has the asymptote:
a._o2
for
(23)
a
Having determined the displacement function for the system S it is now a simple matter to determine the displacement
of the more general oscillator shown in Fig. 6.
Before writing down the solution, it is convenient to in
Q Cos cu
o
troduce the so called mass
m }
ratio B defined by:
This parameter is a dimensionless number which can be
Fig. 6
System S + m
thought of as a scaled measure
for the mass m.
2
Noting that Ba" = m uo /k we obtain from Eqs. 16, 17
and 22 the following displacement for the general damped
oscillator:
6
J^ M
cos (cui+ (p)
(25)
12
where
(26)
**"
and
C27)
The magnification factor M is of special interest.
Its var
iation with 1" for different values of B is shown in Fig. 7.
It is easily shown analytically that whenever B > \
the response spectra shown in Fig. 7 will exhibit resonance
peaks of the heights:
max
(28)
at the frequency ratios:
a =
\ 51/Z
(29)
For B ^ no peaks exist and the largest displacement occurs
for the case of static loading.
The above form of the solution for the simple damped
oscillator is of course equivalent to the more usual form
found in standard textbooks, which use the dimensionless parameters c(j ~\]m/k and c/2 ~\ km .
O
TA7W3
The advantage of using 5 = u/ c/k and B = km/c
is that
Curve through maxima
Mass Ratio B =
Frequency Ratio
Fig. 7
a0 = T"
K
SteadyState Spectra for Simple Damped Oscillator
the effect of frequency and mass can be studied separately,
and for the systems which will be considered below this advantage greatly outweighs the disadvantage that this method
fails for the undamped case (c = 0).
Elastic Half Space With Uniform Loading
In a subsequent section we
will need the steady state so1
, \
'
pn e^\t
lution for the system shown in
Fig. 8.
It consists of a per
fectly elastic half space
(soil) with the mass density
o and the elastic constants
G and u . The half space
is excited by a vertical,
uniform surface loading
p = p e
Fig. 8
Uniformly Loaded
Elastic Half Space
per unit area,
and we are interested in the
displacement o
of the free
surface.
It is clear that it is sufficient to look at a column of
unit area.
Since no horizontal displacements occur, this
column will behave like a rod with zero lateral displacement
and its elastic modulus (constrained modulus) is therefore:
TA7W3
(30)
15
where
(31)
2(1 
The velocity of the Pwaves propagated along the rod
is:
p =_
n1^
9 "
L\
(32)
where V 3 is the velocity of shear waves (S  waves). No refleeted wave will occur since the rod is infinitely long and
the displacements of ths rod must therefore be of the form:
(33)
X =
which is the general expression for a sinusoidal wave with
amplitude A propagated downwards with the constant velocity
Vp.
The tensile stress on a horizontal plane is:
=  iAEnrr eia>
(34)
and the stress boundary condition at the surface (z = 0)
gives consequently:
pe
Cut
(35)
16
or
A 
(36)
Hence, by Eq. 33, the displacement O at the surface is:
(37)
A o
This is exactly the steadystate solution of the differential equation:
6 =
38)
which is also the equation of motion for the simple damped
oscillator shown in Fig. 9This oscillator, which congitul.
sists of just a dashpot with
10
the damping coefficient:
C = 12^
<39)
can therefore be used as an
analog for the uniformly
Fig. 9
Analog for
Half Space
loaded half space as long as
we are only interested in the
displacement of the surface.
This analogy between energy dissipation due to wave
17
propagation and that due to viscous damping is of great interest, since it allows us to study the behavior of an infinite system by considering a simple finite system.
It is
one of the aims of this paper to show that it is possible to
extend this idea to more complicated systems.
In particular,
we will study a system consisting of a rigid circular footing resting on the surface of an elastic half space.
The material elements of an elastic half space possess
no damping properties.
The observed energy dissipation is
therefore entirely due to the infinite geometry of the system, and it will in the following be referred to as geometrical damping, as opposed to viscous damping, which is usually
related to a material property, such as the viscosity of a
fluid.
Rigid Circular Footing
We now turn to the key matter
of the present work, the idealized halfspace model for the
Q'Qe
LUJ\
footingsoil system.
This sys
tem, which is shown in Fig.10,
consists of a circular rigid
footing of mass m which rests
upon a homogeneous, isotropic
and perfectly elastic half
Fig. 10
FootingT'oil System
space with the physical constants G, LL
and o .
It was shown on page 7 that one can find the steadystate
18
solution for this system by first finding the displacement
function for the case m = 0.
The solution for m ^ 0 will
then follow from Eq. 14.
If Poisson's ratio is given, then F can at the most depend on the parameters
Cu , r , G and
p .
The only dimen
sionless ratio which can be formed by these is the frequency
ratio:
(40)
and since F is dimensionless we therefore conclude that it
is a function of
and a
only.
The physical importance of a
becomes clear if one notes
that the velocity of shear waves (S  waves) in an elastic
solid is:
G.
Hence the frequency ratio can also be written in the forms
o
= 2rr
where
(t2)
A is the wave length of Swaves in the half space.
These relations show that one can look at a
either as
o
a frequency, based on the time ro/Vs which it takes a shear
wave to travel from the center to the edge of the footing,
or as a measure for the radius of the footing in relation
19
to the length of the waves propagated in the elastic half
space.
The static spring constant for a rigid footing is known
to be:
k 
(13)
and the expression for the displacement is by Eq. 2:
6 = jjr I(CL^U] e (cut
The. parameters of the corresponding springdashpot analog
are then by Eq. 6 and Eq. 42:
K 
F.
kt k
where the coefficients c, and k, defined by:
(46)
and

~'1
'2
are dimensionless functions of a and //
o
/
By substitution of Eqs. 45 into Eq. 3 we obtain the
following equation of motion for a massless footingsoil
I
20
system:
4
Before considering this equation in more detail we must
study the behavior of c, and k .
the displacement function P.
This requires knowledge of
The analytical determination
of this function involves the solution of the wave equation
for an elastic solid with a mixed boundary condition, namely, a zero stress condition on the free surface of the half
space and a uniform displacement condition under the footing.
This difficult mathematical problem has not yet been solved
exactly and it is therefore necessary to rely on certain
analytical and numerical approximations which will be discussed later.
Low Frequencies
Sung (2) and later Bycroft (3) made the plausible assumption that if the footing is small compared to the wavelength
of the vibrations set up in the half space, that is if a
is
small, then the pressure distribution under the footing is
close to the pressure distribution for the static case
( UJ = a
=0).
This distribution is known from the theory
of elasticity and can be expressed by:
L
, I
p(r) *
(48)
" r
21
Sung (2) and Bycroft (3) therefore replaced the mixed boundary condition with the pure stress condition:
P.e icut
0
<
r >'/
'
'o
and were then able to obtain approximate solutions for the
surface displacements of the half space for the low frequency
range, a Q < 1.5.
The vertical displacement of a surface point at the distance r from the axis of symmetry can be written in the form:
LCU
(50)
where the distance ratio a is defined by
a =
(51)
which is simply a generalization of the definition of the
frequency ratio a , see Eqs. 40 and 42.
The. surface displacement function g = g
+ ig? is dimen
sionless and timeindependent, and is characteristic for the
chosen boundary condition.
In the case of Sung's and
Bycroft's solutions this condition is the static pressure
distribution defined by Eq. 49.
Sung (2) determined only the displacement at the center
22
of the footing (a = 0), while Bycroft (3) went a step further
and calculated the displacement of the footing as a weighted
X
average of the displacements
over the loaded area.
Hence,
Bycroft's solution is to be preferred over Sung's.
Bycroft calculated the displacement of the footing positive when upwards and wrote his final solution in the form:
f =
6
(52)
The real and imaginary parts of his displacement function
f = f1 4 if2 are shown in Fig. 11.
Comparison between Eq. 44 and Eq. 52 shows that Bycroft's
displacement function is connected to the normalized displacement function F used in the present work through the
simple expression:
F 
4
(53)
and this formula has been used to prepare Fig. 12 which
shows that for any practical purpose we can consider F to be
independent of Poisson's ratio.
This is, of course, the
main reason for introducing the normalized displacement function.
From Fig. 12 and Eq. 46, we can directly calculate the
corresponding values of the functions c, and k,.
The result
is shown in Fig. 13.
These displacements are not 'uniform since the assumed
pressure distribution is not the actual one.
23
0.5
1.0
Frequency Ratio a (
Fig. 11
Bycroft's Displacement Function
'
Bycroft
RingMethod
Fig. 12
TA7VI
0.5
1.0
Frequency Ratio a 0
1.5
The Displacement Function F
.858
.836
.793
.784
.8
.6
c
o
.4
o
c
Bycroft
RingMethod
.2
Fig.
.5
1.0
Frequency Ratio a 0
13
1.5
The Functions k^ and c.
46667
26
High Frequencies
When the radius of the footing is much larger than the
wave length of the waves in the half space, that is when a
1
is much greater than unity,we expect the displacement to approach the solution for uniformly loaded half space.
This
problem was solved on page 14, where we found the displacement given by Eq. 37, which can also be written in the form:
1
1
k
where k
r
L(JJ(
(54)
= 4Gr /(l LL ) = pseudo spring constant
o
'
= an arbitrary, but large radius
PQ =
p^
o
= total force on area with radius r
aO = (+.> rO/Vo
= frequency ratio
Eq. 54 is in the standard form (Eq. 2) and we conclude that
the asymptote for the displacement function F is:
a c.
, for
(55)
where
(56)
This asymptote is similar to the one found for the simple
damped oscillator, see Eq. 23.
27
The variation of the coefficient 1/c,
with Poisson's
ratio is shown in Fig. 14.
It
'OO
will be seen that in the range
0.32.
0<^/& <^ 0.4 the error made by
setting 1/Cpo = 0.92 for all
^X^. is smaller than 6% which
is quite insignificant for most
practical problems.
That
I/GOO = 0 for/6^ =  is not
./ .2 .3 4 .5
Pig. 14
Varation of 1/coo
with Poisson's Ratio
surprising
since this case cor
responds to a situation where
the half space is incompressible.
Intermediate_Frequencies
At very low and very high frequencies we could estimate
the distribution of the pressure under the footing.
This
method fails completely in the approximate range 1.5<"a <(Q,
where the wavelengths of the waves propagated through the
elastic half space and the dimension of the footing are of
the same order of magnitude.
A special method will therefore
be developed for solving the problem in this range.
The
method is based on Reissner's (l) original solution for a uniform pressure distribution, and it will, for reasons which
become apparent later, be called the ring method.
JL
Reissner showed that the surface displacement function
For definition see Eq. 50 on page 21.
28
for the case of a uniform pressure distribution over a circular area of radius r
is:
where
f(x) = (2x2  I)2 4x' KsC Kl
x
(58)
= The positive root of f(x)
J & J,= Bessel functions of the first kind
o
Equation 57 is valid for all values of a and a , but
the integral has never been evaluated except for a  0 and
a = a , for which cases it is possible to establish a solution by series.
As will be understood from the following, it
is desirable to evaluate g(a, a ) for a larger range of a and
a , and such an evaluation has been carried out in Appendix
I, for the special case of Poisson's ratio equal to 1/3.
The actual pressure distribution under a rigid footing
is not uniform, but varies in both phase and magnitude with
the distance r from the center of the footing.
However, in
view of the rotational symmetry it can be assumed that the
pressure is uniform over the area of any narrow ring which
is concentric with the footing.
The footing can therefore
be replaced by the ring system shown in Fig. 15.
This system consists of n rings of equal width and the
radii are consequently related through:
TA7
rm =
(59)
29
ELEVATION
PLAN
Fig. 15
Ring System
30
where "*n*~
r
is""'
Identical to the parameter
_ i . . . . r^Q used above.
_i
The pressure over the m
ring is uniform and harmonic
and can be written as:
Icut
P.
(60)
where the pressure coefficient a
pressure over the m
is the ratio between the
ring and the average pressure over the
footing.
For small amplitudes of vibration the principle of superposition will be valid, and the vertical displacement of
point j, due to the loading on the m
calculated by Eq. 50.
' ring, can therefore be
After a series of elementary calcula
tions one arrives at the expression:
)jrr>
Gr n
/'cut
(61)
where
(62)
^m
m
n
n
rn
>
(63)
The total displacement of point j can be found by summation
over all the rings, and is most conveniently written in the
form;
c
TA7'
rnl
(64)
31
where
(65)
is a known influence coefficient.
If the above ring system is to be compatible with a
rigid footing, it must be required that all the points j=l,
2...,n have the same displacement.
The following must
therefore be satisfied:
(66)
Substitution of Eq. 64 into this shows that the pressure
coefficients q
must satisfy the n1 equations:
<6T>
///=/
It must also be required that the total force over the
n rings is equal to the exciting force P e iatt
This con
dition yields the linear equation:
n
m
(2m1) = n
(68)
which is easily obtained from Eq. 60.
The relationships Eq. 67 and Eq. 68 form a complete set
of n linear equations from which the pressure coefficients
q can be determined.
m
Both the coefficients and the
32
unknowns in these equations are complex variables, but this
causes little extra difficulty as the complex equations can
be transformed Into a set of 2n linear equations between
real quantities by simple separation of the real and imaginary parts.
Once the pressure coefficients are determined the vert
ical displacement of the footing can be calculated from
Eq. 64 with j = n, i.e. :
(69)
5
This equation is of the same form as Eq. 52, and it is readily
seen that the displacement function f is:
(70)
The displacement function F follows then from Eq. 53:
4
The ring method described above has been programmed for the
IBM 7090 computer., and several runs have been made using systems of up to 20 rings and a value of 1/3 for Poisson's
ratio.
The most significant result is the displacement function
F shown with a dashed line in Fig. 16 and Fig. 12 and in tabular form on page 111 of Appendix II.
It agrees well with
/;
n>
9
CO
ct
i
w
o
ct
c*
3
ct
(t
&
(0
O
H0)
to
tl
Displacement Function F
Bycroft's solution in the low frequency range and approaches
the asymptote given by Eq. 55.
It should be noted that the displacement function for
the rigid footingsoil system is very similar to the displacement function_for a springdashpot system, see Pig. 5It was shown previously that F is virtually independent
of Poisson's ratio for both low and very high values of a .
;
It is therefore realistic to assume that the variation of F
is approximately as shown in Fig. 16 for all values of
Poisson's ratio.
Knowing F we can again calculate c, and k., . The results
of these calculations are shown in Fig. 17 and also, for the
low frequency range, in Fig. 13 (dotted curve).
It can be shown that a ~c*=>
lim c in = c _ . which was defined by
0
Eq. 56. Also, it can be shown that Q.Q^
limc>^3Ic,L exists, but the
actual value is not known.
This, however, is of little impor
tance since the term k,k o in Eq. 47 becomes insignificant at
high frequencies.
Pressure Distribution
It is not the intention here to describe in detail the
variation of the dynamic pressure distribution under a rigid
footing, but, since it is generated as a byproduct of the
ring method, a single example is shown in Fig. 18.
The steps
shown are the real and imaginary parts of the pressure coefficients q , defined by Eq. 60, while the curves marked
TA7
q1 and qp are the supposed envelopes for the limiting case
35
1.0
.8
o
c
.6
o
3
4
5
6
7
Frequency R a t i o a 0
Fig. 17
The Functions k^ and
for Poisson's Ratio = 1/3
10
36
I
<M
oTJ
c
o
I
I
to
"c
O)
'o
o
<u
Static pressure
distribution
V)
L_
CL
*O
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Distance Ratio a = r / r 0
The real part of the pressure is
p
p ( t ) = (q,cos outq 2 sincut )
r
o
Fig. 18
Pressure Distribution for the Case:
aQ = 1
37
of infinitely many rings.
The pressure distribution is at
any given time:
f>(r,t) 
(72)
It will be seen that even at the relatively low frequency ratio a
= 1 the distribution deviates significantly
from the static distribution, which according to Eq. 49 is:
(7.3)
0
At higher frequencies the distribution becomes more complicated.
The central part of the distribution remains rela
tively uniform while the part near the edge starts to oscillate violently forming a diverging wave.
Displacements of the Free Surface
Another byproduct of the ring method is information
about the vertical displacements of the free surface in the
vicinity of an oscillating rigid footing.
This displacement
will vary in both phase and magnitude with the distance from
the footing forming the vertical component of the Rayleigh
wave (Rwave) created by the disturbance.
The displacement is readily calculated from Eq. 64
which is also valid for j greater than n.
This equation can,
therefore, be used to calculate not only F but also the complete surface displacement function defined by Eq. 50.
Fig.
38
19 shows the real and imaginary parts of g for the special
case, a
= 1, and Poisson's ratio equal to 1/3.
The displacement has the form of a divergent wave.
The
wave length, in terms of the dimensionless distance a, is
slightly shorter than 27T . By the definition of a, Eq. 51,
this indicates that the actual wave length is slightly shorter than the wave length of the shear waves in the half space
This is in agreement with the current theories for the propagation of Rwaves.
See Rayleigh (9) or for a more recent
presentation Ewing, Jardetsky and Press (10).
Response Spectra
Having determined the displacement function F we can
now turn to the case where the footing has a certain mass m.
It is here convenient to introduce the mass ratio:
5 =
(74)
which is such that:
= mw2'
/k
(75)
The above mass ratio is proportional to the mass ratio
Q
b = m/ o r
used by other authors: RIchart (5),Sung (2),etc.
The equation of motion can be obtained from Eq. 47 simply
by adding an inertia term:
m 6 + 6,
(76)
.05
t=l/4 x period
8
= r/r c
/ /mf / // /1 /1
^Amplitude
NO
The real part of the
vertical surface displacement
at any given time and distance is
J
I
( t ) =   (9, coscjt g 2 sincot)
.15
Fig. 19 Surface Displacements for the Case:
a = 1, /*= 1/3
f
which has a solution of the form:
(77)
This gives upon substitution into Eq. 76 the displacement
function:
F =
(J8)
The magnification factor, defined on page 8, is therefore:
M 
(79)
from which the response spectra shown by solid lines in Fig.
20 have been calculated using the functions c, and k, shown
in Fig. 16.
It was mentioned on page 3^ that F is practically independent of Poisson's ratio and the same is therefore to be
expected for F~. In fact, it is easily shown that the relative
variation of F with LL is smaller than that of F.
Hence,
the spegtra.shown in Fig. 20 can be used for all values of
Poisson's ratio.
The phase shift is:
= tan
TA
(80)
Halfspace theory
(/i= 1/3)
Simplified analog
( k, =1, c, = 0.85)
o
o
c
o
o
en
O
Frequency Ratio a 0 =
Fig. 20
SteadyState Spectra for FootingSoil System
and the displacement caused by the exciting force Q cosoj t
is finally:
6 
CBl)
Simplified Analog
The practical application of the above theory has shown
that only limited agreement can be achieved between observed
and calculated amplitudes.
This is mainly due to discrepan
cies between the theoretical halfspace model and an actual
footingsoil system, the soil phase of which is generally
nonlinear , inhomogeneous and imperfectly described.
The
mathematical difficulties involved in the strict use of the
halfspace model are therefore hardly justified, and even
crude approximations can be introduced in practical calculations, without reducing the reliability of the calculated
response.
In particular, we can attempt to replace the half
space system with a simple damped oscillator with similar dynamic properties.
One way of doing this would be to assign
appropriate constant values to the functions c, and k, appearing in Eq. 76.
Since
This can be done as follows:
has been established that c,, and k
ed, see page 34
we conclude from Eq
which is generally
are bound
78 that for B / 0,
e case, we have
(82)
2
0
The last of these, with Eqs.75 and 77,gives the displacement:
bu t
O
Q*
('cut
(83)
k Ba'
which ihows that for B ^ 0 and a >> 1 the response of the
footingsoil system is completely independent of the properties of the elastic half space, hence we can choose c^ and k^
very freely in the high frequency range.
This could also
have been deduced from Eq. 76 by observing that the inertia
term dominates the left side at high frequencies.
Equation 82 shows that in order to have agreement for the
static case we must choose k, = 1.
It also shows that at
very low frequencies we can assign any value to c .
The influence of c, is strongest at the resonance peaks,
that is in the range 0.3 < aQ < 0.8, and it is therefore
reasonable to choose c, as an average value over this range.
Pig. 13 shows that 0.85 is appropriate.
= 0.85 and
Thus,let:
= 1.00
(84)
This is equivalent to replacing the footingsoil system by
a simplified analog consisting of a simple damped oscillator
with the physical parameters:
ll
mass of footing
m =
c =
(85)
k =
= static spring constant
1/A
The error made by this apparently bold approximation is
surprisingly
small as can be seen in Pig. 20 where the res
ponse spectra for the simplified analog are shown with dotted
lines.
The relative error can be calculated from:
\
'
1
n
(86)
and Fig. 21 shows how this error varies with a
and B.
It
will be seen that the error is small in the important range
a <^ 0.8 where both amplitudes and resonance frequencies can
be calculated from the analog with an error which does not
exceed
For larger values of a
and small values of B the rela
tive error might be as great as 35$.
However, Bvalues be
low \, which correspond to very large and very light footings,
are not usually encountered in practice and an error of 35$
would therefore be most unusual.
Furthermore, the absolute
value of an error of this type will be small since it occurs
on the tail of the response spectrum (see Fig. 20).
Another way of comparing the solution for the halfspace
model with that of the simplified analog is to compare the
displacement functions for the two systems.
This has been
done in Fig. 1.6, which corresponds to the most unfavorable
case B = 0.
AM
M
B=IO
10
0
10
20
30
B=0
Fig. 21
The Relative Difference between the Spectra
of the HalfSpace Model and the Simplified Analog
46
Practical Formulas
Assuming the acceptance of the above simplified analog
we can now set up the following set of formulas for the
steadystate motion of the footingsoil system in Fig. 10:
Spring constant
Mass ratio
Frequency ratio
K 
j^
(87)
L/JL
m
1 ~;
\&
(89)
ao^
Displacement amplitude
(88)
~1CH_^L_ "
(on)
V y^1 I
Phase shift
= ton
(9,1)
Displacement
(92)
A COS
Resonance occurs only when B^) 0.36 and one can establish
the following approximate formulas for the resonance condition;
Resonance frequency
Resonance amplitude
'res
0,
(93)
e>
Equations 3 and 4 were arrived from Eqs. 28 and 29 by
observing that the mass and frequency ratios for the analog
are:
(95)
55
a  a ct
0.&5 Ct
(96)
Free Vibrations
Since the steadystate response spectra for the footingsoil system and its simplified analog show good agreement
for all frequencies we can conclude that the two systems will
behave similarly not only for steadystate excitation, but
also for other types of dynamic loading.
In particular,
their free motions will be similar.
The natural damped frequency for a simple linear oscillator is:
1 B _ 0.
B
Hence, by Eqs. 85 and 95^ we obtain the following
for the natural damped frequency of a footingsoil
1 fi o.
which is good for B ^ 1/4.
(97)
expression
system:
(98)
For Bvalues smaller than this
the motion is either nonoscillatory or very strongly damped.
Such small Bvalues are rarely encountered in technical applications.
The logarithmic decrement for a damped oscillator can
<
II
I
La
be shown to be:
(99)
tn
where x
and x
are consecutive displacement amplitudes
to the same side.
By substitution of Eq. 95 into this we
obtain the following approximation to the logarithmic decre
ment for a footingsoil system:
:r
(10)
~o7d
Mass ratios higher than B = 5 are rarely encountered in
practice and since the logarithmic decrement for this case is
as high as 1.22, corresponding to x
/ x
= 3.^, we con
clude that all normal footingsoil systems are strongly damped by geometrical dispersion of wave energy.
RotatingMass Systems
Many important dynamic systems, such as mechanical oscillators and machine founda
II
tions, are excited by one or
more eccentric rotating masses,
^
I
\
,,'..
u/cNp^^/j
m
(rn ., /
typical member of this class
of systems
is shown in Fig.22.
The system is identical to the
system S + m in Fig. 3 except
for the mass m, which rotates
relative to the mass m with
li
Fig. 22
RotatingMass System
eccentricity A. and angular
frequency <J
The spring
"1
M
M
05
Ct
O
M
o
en
o
0)
W
HS
03
cf
73
<D
O
cn
03
05
ct
03
Ct
TO
*)
H
O
*
CD
n>
r>
c
617
Magnification Factor
Mr
50
constant K and the damping constant C are frequency dependent
I
I
I
and are defined by Eq. 6.
The equation of motion for the mass m is:
(m+m<] 6 + C 6 + K 6 
(101)
which shows that the system behaves like a system with the
2
t
mass m + m, excited by the harmonic force uj m., /I cos c> t.
For the special case of the simple damped oscillator,
see Pig. 6, we can write this force as:
p
Q = ao Q1 cos cut
II
(i>2)
where
a
Substitution of Eq. 102 into Eq. 25 gives directly the
displacement :
where M and
(D are given by Eqs. 26 and 27 respectively.
The variation of the magnification factor:
where
B ^ k (m+m^/c2
(106)
is shown in Fig. 23. For B > \ it exhibits a resonance
peak at
a =
(107)
51
with
(108)
and for all values of B it approaches the limit 1/B as the
frequency goes to infinity.
This implies that the amplitude
of displacement has the limit:
I iim
cu * co
(109)
This last formula is true for all rotatingmass systems
of the general type shown in Fig. 22.
For the case of the halfspace model it is practical to
introduce the mass ratio:
m. + mf
K
B=
/ i/ > 2
(no)
With this variable the equivalents of Eqs.102 to 105 become:
(2 =
&1 CS 't
(111)
(112)
(113)
The phase shift
given by Eq. 80.
is, as for the constant force oscillator,
52
The variation of M
is shown in Fig. 24.
The full
lines correspond to the solution for the halfspace model
(c, and k, from Fig. 17) and the dotted lines correspond to
a new simplified analog obtained by setting:
k, = c1 = 0.90
for all frequencies.
This choice of k, and c
(115)
gives a some
what smaller error in the practical region of resonance, see
below, than the simplified analog defined by Eq. 84.
The new simplified analog is a simple damped oscillator
for which:
a0
ac <:,//<, = a0
B  bk/cf
= B/o.3
(116)
(117)
These relations, in connection with Eqs. 107 and 108 give
directly the following approximate formulas for the determination of the resonance peaks:
as
*0=
b 0.45
0.9
8 0.225
(118)
(119)
No peaks exist when B ^ 0.45 and the maxima for
B <^ .9 are hardly significant enough to be classified as
resonance peaks.
Even for the heaviest footings we rarely
encounter mass ratios greater than 5, and the practical
range of resonance frequencies is therefore approximately
0.7 <
< 1.4
New Simplified Analog
(K, = C , =0.9)
HalfSpace Model
vn
Frequency Ratio a0
Fig. 24
RotatingNiass Spectra for FootingSoil System
Ill
TRANSIENT MOTION
Numerical Method
The transient motion of a strongly damped linear system
excited by a Dulse of arbitrary shape and duration can be
determined by a simple Fourier analysis if the steadystate
solution for the system is known at all frequencies.
In
order to show this we first consider the motion of a footingsoil system excited by the vertical dynamic loading shown in
Pig. 25.
This loading consists of a train of identical
pulses of alternating sign and duration d.
The pulses are
equally spaced with the time interval jd (j = integer), and
the loading is therefore periodic with the period 2jd.
The
individual .pulses can be expressed in the form:
aw = Q0<p(yd]
where Q
is the maximum value of the force., and
(120)
<p
is a
dimensionless pulseshape function, see Fig. 26a.
The pulse train shown in Fig. 25 can be developed into
a Fourier series of the form:
= *r<
flO
where N is a large integer and
(121)
55
Oft)
t
Jd
Period = 2i
Fig. 25
Typical Pulse Train
t/d
Fig. 26a
Typical PulseShape Functions
56
(122)
(123)
(124)
For small amplitudes the principle of superposition is
valid and a Fourier series for the displacement can therefore
be obtained by applying Eq. 8l to each of the terms of Eq.
121.
This gives:
6(t)  a.
K no
where
(126)
II,
a =
n
(127)
tan
The variables k., and c, are functions of a
obtained from Fig. 17 or calculated from Eq. 46.
(128)
and can be
Or, if it
is desired to base the calculations on the simplified analog
they can be set at the constant values 1.00 and 0.85 respectively.
57
Equation 126 shows that:
n
n \ * Const.
Ba*
, for n
(129)
hence the series defined by Eq. 125 converges faster than
the series given by Eq. 121. This means that a good approximation to the response of the footing can be obtained with
a reasonably
small number N of harmonics of the pulse train.
This corresponds to the wellknown phenomena for multidegree
of freedom systems, that most of the response occurs in the
lower modes of vibration.
A method for choosing the number N
will be given below, see Eq. 143.
Now consider the behavior of the system under the influence of a pulse train with large spacing between the
pulses (j large).
During the period while a pulse is acting,
energy is fed into the system and the amplitude of vibration
will therefore increase.
During the subsequent period, when
no force is acting, the system will perform free vibrations
which, since the system is strongly damped, will die out
after a few oscillations.
Hence, when the consecutive pulse
arrives, the system will behave as if the previous pulse had
never existed.
Consequently,
sufficiently
if the above analysis is performed with a
large choice of j, the result will be a periodic
displacement which, within each half period corresponds to
:
the displacement due to a single pulse.
The above calculations are easily performed on an electronic computer and a FORTRAN II program for pulse shapes of
I
the piecewise linear type shown in Pig. 26b is presented in
Appendix II.
The program calculates not only the displace
ments but also the velocities and the accelerations which are
easily obtained by differentiation of Eq. 125.
The piecewise linear pulse used in the program is particularly convenient because it makes it possible to replace the
integral expressions of Eq. 124 by the following finite sums
which are easy to handle in the computer:
m
(=0
tw
I (130)
io
where
u ~ Jum = 3um+1 = 0
1 = Jo
(131)
The pulse type also has the advantage that the exciting
force can be defined simply by specifying the ordinates y ,
y? ' ' 'yml'
^uration
and the force level Q, .
The Integers N and j
A few remarks should be given as to the choice of the
integers j and N.
If the footingsoil system is of the oscillatory type,
B large, it has, according to Eqs. 98 and 100, the approximate natural period:
T=
2TT
tu.
(132)
59
and the logarithmic decrement:
(133)
Hence, the amplitude of free vibration will vary as:
A = Ace'
and the time t, necessary to reduce the amplitude to a
fraction
, of the initial amplitude is:
76,
(135)
For footingsoil systems of the nonoscillatory type, B
small, it can be shown by considering the simplified analog
that the amplitude varies according to the law:
A'* A e v^^^
(136)
hence, we have for this case:
/ = QM^U,*, 2
?S
(137)
VS
10
The estimates, Eq. 135 and Eq. 137, can be combined into the
upper bound:
(138)
which for all values of B can be used as an appropriate time
interval between the individual pulses of the pulse train.
This gives the following criterion for the integer j:
> 1 .
10
(139)
60
An appropriate choice of the integer N can'be obtained
by the condition that the magnification factor corresponding
to the highest frequency ratio a,, appearing in the series Eq.
125 should be smaller than a certain value, say
. This
gives by Eqs. 79 and 84 the following restriction on a :
<
(140)
which since we generally have Ba,, )>> 1 reduces to:
(141)
But aN is by Eq. 127:
r0
(142)
J
which with Eq. l4l gives the following bound for N:
(143)
N >
The integer N can often be chosen considerably smaller
than indicated by this inequality but such a reduction requires
special consideration in each case.
It is usually rational to choose the 63
appearing in
Eqs. 139 and 143 to be identical, say 0.05 or 0.01.
Smaller
values are hardly justified for practical calculations.
61
Trapezoidal Pulse
Consider the footingsoil system defined by:
f ft
, G = 2500
V,' = 483 kips , X = 128.66 pcf
The velocity of shear waves in the half space is by Eq. 4l:
ft/sec
128.6&/$
and the mass ratio is by Eq.
(146)
128.6&*5
The latter shows that the system is of the oscillatory type,
The damped natural frequency is by Eq. 98:
BOO
~]50.18
0/
1
sec
(147)
and the corresponding period is:
277
= 0.24 sec
The logarithmic decrement is by Eq. 100:
O, =
2.67
_, _ .
,
^ 1.2Z
(149)
and the ratio between consecutive amplitude maxima in free
vibration is therefore 3.4 indicating a strongly damped
system.
Now let this system be excited by the pulse shown in
62
Fig. 27.
This pulse has the property of being constant,
equal to 250,000 lb., for a period of 0.9 sec., which is
considerably,longer than the natural period of the system,
S(t)
g = 250 kips
,1
.2
.3 4
.5 A
Duration d  i
.8
i sec
Pig. 27 Trapezoidal Pulse
Drawing from our knowledge of linear damped oscillations we therefore expect the footing to perform damped
oscillations about the static displacement:
static
250,000
4* 2500* 144* 5
As a check on this expectation the response was calculated by the method outlined above.
The
to be 0.05 which gave: j = 2 and N = 40.
's were chosen
The actual compu
ter output is shown on page 116 ., and the displacements are
shown graphically in Pig. 28 (full curve marked B = 5,
G = 2500).
It will be seen that the natural frequency, the
amount of damping, and the static displacement agree with
the figures calculated above.
The curves marked with the mass ratios B = 2, 1 and i
Displacement S(t) in inches
II
64
show the effect of changing the weight of the footing while
all other variables arebeing kept constant.
The free
motion of a light footing is, as expected,, more strongly
damped than that of a heavy footing.
An increase of the modulus G of the soil to say
G = 5000 psi affects the magnitude of the vibrations of the
system, but not its relative damping.
This is illustrated
by the curve marked B = 5, G = 5000.
All the above curves were obtained by applying the
above Fourier method to the halfspace model; i.e., using
the functions c., and k shown in Fig. 17 in the formulas
Eqs. 126 and 128.
Exactly the same method can be used for the simplified
analog defined by Eqs. 85.
This is achieved simply by set
ting c, = 0.85 and k
 1 and the result for the case B = 5,
G = 2500 psi is shown with a dotted line in Fig. 28.
The
close agreement between the response of the simplified analog
and that of the footingsoil system shows, as expected, that
the analog can be used, not only for the case of steadystate
motion, but also for transient motion.
This observation is of importance for practical calculations since the analog is a classical system, which can be
treated by a variety of well known methods, such as numerical
integration or phaseplane techniques, which do not require
the availability of an electronic computer,,
11
65
Triangular Pulse
As a second example, we will consider the behavior of
a footingsoil system excited
by the simple triangular pulse
shown in Fig. 29.
The dis
placement is given by Eq. 125,
which after introduction of
0/2
the dimensionless time:
r=
Pig. 29
Triangular Pulse
(151)
and the corresponding dimensionless duration:
(152)
can be written in the form:
(153)
This expression shows that the maximum displacement can be
expressed by:
^maK~~
~7T^Ux()>^)
(154)
where D
( i , B) Is a dimensionless function which will be
max / /
called the displacement spectrum.
Its variation with
and B is shown in Fig. 30, which was determined by application
of the above Fourier method to a series of selected footingsoil systems excited by triangular pulses of different duration.
The dotted curves in the figure show corresponding
B  5 2
O.5 O.25
d/2
d
Pulse Shape
Halfspace model
Simplified analog
20
Dimensionless
Fig. 30
Duration
Displacement Spectrum for Triangular Pulse
67
values calculated from the simplified analog.
The close agree
ment between the two set of curves confirms again the feasibility of the suggested analog.
Displacement
spectra of the type shown in Fig. 30 can
be prepared for any pulse shape, not only for maximum displacements but also for maximum velocities and accelerations.
They are of great practical interest since they constitute a
simple and fast tool for the calculation of the maximum response of a given footingsoil system.
f
I
IV
COMPARISON WITH TEST RESULTS
Several researchers have presented data which substantiate the elastic halfspace theory presented above, at
least for small displacements.
Most of the data was obtain
ed from steadystate tests in the low frequency range,
a
<C 1.5^ and special attention was given to the resonance
condition.
Lately this data has been supplemented by re
sults from impactloading tests.
Determination of Soil Properties
In studying the test results one must bear in mind
that only limited agreement with the theory can be expected
since soil is not a perfect elastic material.
And, even
under laboratory conditions it is not homogeneous nor isotropic.
The determination of appropriate elastic constants
to be used in the theory is therefore a difficult problem.
An extensive survey of the available methods has been given
by Whitman (ll) and only two of the more promising methods
will be described here.
Both methods are dynamic, which is
natural since the dynamic shear modulus of soil can vary
widely from the static value, and both methods involve the
determination of wave velocities.
68
69
The first method is triaxial dynamic testing.
This
technique has been developed by Shannon et al. (12), Hardin,
Richart (13) and Hall (l4).
It involves the determination
of the torsional and longitudinal resonance frequencies of
cylindrical triaxial specimens.
From these frequencies one
can calculate the wave velocities V s and V p and the elastic
constants of the half space follow then from:
(155)
(156)
Equation 155 can be derived from Eqs. 31 and 32 and Eq. 156
follows directly from Eq. 4l.
The tests must be carried out at a confining pressure
corresponding to the average pressure under the footing.
This can be estimated by the theory of elasticity.
For
clean sand one can obtain a first estimate of G from the
test results published by Hardin and Richart
(13).
The second method to be discussed here will be called
in situ testing.
It consists of two parts.
First, the vel
ocity of Pwaves is measured by a simple seismic test.
In
this test a shock is induced at the soil surface by a drop
weight or hammer and the arrival time of the first disturbance is recorded by a pickup placed on the soil surface at
a known distance from the source.
Since the Pwaves travel
considerably faster than any other type of waves this gives
a direct measurement of V . By comparing the arrival times
at different distances it is furthermore possible to determine the variation of V with the depth below the surface.
P
For further details see Fry
The second part of the in situ method is a determination
of the velocity VR of Rayleigh surface waves by a method suggested by Jones (15) and further developed by Ballard
and Fry (17).
(l6)
In this method a small vertical oscillator is
placed on the soil surface and the nodes of the resulting
surface waves,, Rwaves, are located by means of a portable
pickup.
From the distance between the nodes and the known
frequency one can then calculate the velocity of the Rwaves.
This velocity is only slightly smaller than the velocity of
Swaves.
For soils one can assume that V
1=05 . The
n
actual ratio varies with Poisson's ratio and is equivalent
to the variable x
defined on page 28. Knowing V we can
o
s
again calculate Poisson's ratio jM from Eq. 155 and the
shear modulus G from Eq. 1.56.
Without going into details it
should be mentioned that the method can. be refined to detect
variations in V S with the depth below the surface
This is
done by performing the test at different frequencies.
The
idea being that low frequency Rwaves penetrate deeper than
waves of high frequency.
SteadyState Tests
Steadystate tests on footings were carried out long
before the appearance of the first elastic halfspace theories.
Notable are the tests carried out at the Deutsche
Forschungsgesellschaft fur Bodenmekanik (DEGEBO).
These
71
tests were analysed by Hertwig, Pruh and Lorenz (18) who,
like the author, compared the vibrations of the footingsoil
systems with that of a simple oscillator.
However, while the
author's model has the same mass as the footing, the above
researchers were trying to set up a set of rules for determining the so called inphase mass, which is the mass which
has to be added to the mass of the footing in order to obtain
agreement between the observed and the theoretical response.
The search was only partly successful since it turned out that
the inphase mass depended on frequency and several other
factors.
In spite of this, the concept of the inphase mass
has since achieved great popularity among engineers and
Hsieh (4) has shown how a frequencydependent inphase mass
can, in fact, be calculated from the halfspace theory.
The U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station
at Vicksburg, Mississippi, has carried out a very extensive
program of steadystate field tests on circular concrete
footings having diameters varying from 5 to 16 feet and excited by an oscillator of the rotatingmass type.
Data were
obtained for 63 tests on a silty clay (loess) and 39 tests
on a uniform fine sand.
The results were reported by Fry (6)
and later analysed by Chae (7) and Whitman (ll), who both
found good agreement between the observed resonance amplitudes and the corresponding amplitudes calculated by the
elastic halfspace theory.
The standard deviation from the
predicted amplitudes was about 30^ which must be characterized as satisfactory under field conditions.
As could be
72
expected the agreement with the elastic theory was best for
the cohesive soil.
A series of steadystate tests of special interest to
the author was carried out at the University of Michigan by
Chae (?) who, simultaneously with the author's theoretical
work, determined the displacement functions f, and ~ experimentally and studied the dynamic pressure distribution
under a rigid footing on dry sand.
For this purpose, a
special footing was constructed, see Pig. 31.
It consisted
of a set of concentric steel rings, each of which was connected to a common rigid steel plate through four load cells.
The latter were simply short pieces of aluminum tubing instrumented with SR4 strain gages.
These, in connection
with additional electronic equipment, made it possible to
determine the pressure distribution under the lower plate
due to a static or dynamic loading on the upper plate.
The soil used in the tests was highly compacted Ottawa
sand contained in a 4'9" square sand bin with 4' high concrete block walls.
The system was driven by an oscillator
which could be placed on the upper plate of the footing by
means of a special loading frame.
The mass ratio B of the
system could be varied from approximately 1 to 5 by means of
special weights.
A summary of Chae's test results for the displacement
function F is shown in Figs. 32 and 33
He actually found a
small variation with the mass ratio of the footing, but this
has been neglected for the purpose of the present presentation,
73
AREAS'
RING I TO 5 * 21 IN*
RING 6  8 . 1 I N *
CUPPER
PLATE
LOAD CELL
2 lRINGS
UPPER PLATE
Fig.
31
Special Footing, from Chae ( ? )
The agreement with the author's theory is good except for
F., at very low frequencies.
This is not surprising since it
is well known that the static pressure distribution under a
footing on sand deviates drastically from the theoretical
distribution given by Eq. 49,
The actual pressure has a
maximum under the center of the footing and vanishes at the
edge.
The effect of this change on the elastic halfspace
theory was studied by Sung (2) who assumed that the pressure
distribution was parabolic and obtained the solution for P,
shown in Fig. 32.
It should be noted that Sung's solution
is for the center of the loaded area (r = 0).
The average
displacement is therefore somewhat smaller than indicated
by the curve.
The large deviations on Fp found at high fre
quencies can be explained by experimental errors, in particular difficulties in determining the phase shift and the fact
that at high frequencies the inertia force from the mass of
the footing over shadows the forces from the soil.
These
latter are therefore difficult to determine accurately and
this is again reflected in the large scatter of the experimental values for F
and Fp.
The inertia effect is, of
course, the same as the one from which we profited on page
43 when we established the simplified analog.
Impact Tests
&
V1
Data on impact tests is scarce in the literature but a
series of tests which support the author's theory has been
carried out at the University of Michigan and the results
will be published shortly by Drnevich, Hall and Richart
(8).
o
rr
03
CD
"1
CD
05
03
I1
cf
0)
3
0)
0)
T
H
X
T!
en
Displacement Function F,
P

en
oo
03
(D
n
or
N)
ff
fD
cn
to
03
0)
3
c^
a>
"1
H3
X)
o
o
o
*
o'
"
n>
T\
l
<T>
ro
P
bi
O
Displacement Function F2
77
The footing and the soil were exactly the same as that used
by Chae (7) but the oscillator was 'replaced by a mechanism
with which a small sand bag could be dropped on the top of
a load cell placed on the upper plate of the footing.
This
simple arrangement made it possible to record the actual impact load on the footing and. experience showed that both the
shape and the duration of the pulse could be controlled by
changing the height of fall and by placing different foam
rubber pads on top of the load cell.
The displacements were
recorded in terms of accelerations which were obtained by
means of an accelerometer mounted on the footing.
The re
sults of two tests are shown in Figs. 3^ and 35 where they
are compared with the theoretical response calculated by
the method described in Chapter III.
The actual computer
output for one of the curves in Fig. 35 ( M =1/^0 is shown
on page 123 of Appendix II.
The agreement between the theoretical and the experimental curves is excellent up to a, certain time., approximately 37 ms for test Ml, and then the curves suddenly lose
their similarity.
This can be explained as follows:
The
principal effect of the impact is the propagation of an
Swave from the footing towards the side walls of the sand
bin and a Pwave towards the bottom of the bin,,
these waves will be reflected by the walls.
Both of
The halfspace
theory is therefore valid only up to the time when any one
of these reflected waves arrive back at the footing.
return time is easily estimated.
This
For test Ml the shear
78
wave velocity is V s = 325 ft/sec and assumingPoisson's ratio
equal to 1/4 we find, by Eq. 32, V  560 ft/sec. The Swave
has to travel approximately 4.75 ft; thus it returns back in
15 ms.
The Pwave has to travel 8 ft and it returns to the
footing in 14 ms.
Since the peak of the pulse occurs at ap
proximately 18 ms we can therefore expect serious deviation
from the theory after 33 ms.
This number agrees well with
the 37 ms actually observed. For test T3 the waves travel
faster, therefore the disagreement occurs somewhat earlier.
Finally, it should be noted that it makes little difference which value of Poisson's ratio is used in the calculations.
Therefore, it is hardly worthwhile to carry out
special tests to establish a correct value for this ratio.
An intelligent guess should be sufficient for most practical
calculations.
A value of 0.33 for dry soil and 0.50 for sat
urated soil will usually be accurate enough.
79
Q(t)
100
o
L.
50
la.
0
10
20
30
CM
O
a>
c
o
a>
o
o
Footing: r 0 = 0.5 ft, W = 69.7 Ib
Soil: G = 2500psi, / = 109 pcf
Observed
Calculated, p.= 0.25, B = 0.96
Calculated , p. = 0.40 , B = 0.77
Fig. 34
Test Ml, by Drnevich, Hall and Richart (&)
ii i:
80
iQ(t)
Footing: r 0 =0.5ft, W = 239.9 Ib
300
Soil: G = 4200 psi,/= 109 pcf
Mass Ratio:
B = 3.30
200
QJ
0
100
0
J
0
100
600i
i/wv v A
time
2 c)
30
40 ms
Observed
Calculated, ^=0.25
400 o
<D
V)
200 c
o
0)
o
o
Fig. 35
Test T3
by Drnevich, Hall and Richart (8)
CONCLUSION
I
The halfspace model considered in the preceding
chapters is a compromise between mathematical convenience
and accurate representation of an actual footingsoil system.
However, the usefulness of the model has been clearly demonstrated by the fact that the discrepancies between calculated
and observed displacements fall well within the range which
one can expect for a soilfooting system, which by nature
is rather poorly defined.
On the other hand, the observed discrepancies are significantly larger than the differences found between displacements calculated from the halfspace model and corresponding displacements calculated from the simplified analog.
The conclusion to be drawn from this must be that the simplified analog is to be preferred for its mathematical ease over
the only apparently more accurate halfspace model.
Thus,
the problem of determining the vertical motion of a footingsoil system has been reduced to the problem of determining
the motion of a simple damped oscillator defined by the following equation of motion:
_
j /^
_r
(157)
81
82
This analog, which is the most important result of the present work, can be solved by several well known methods such
as direct or numerical integration, phase plane, etc.
The study shows that all footingsoil
systems are
strongly damped due to wave propagation into the subsoil.
This geometrical damping will generally be much more significant than the material damping of the soil and the latter can
therefore be neglected in practical calculations.
The damp
ing ratio decreases with increasing mass ratio of the system
and the motion of a large and light footing will therefore
be more strongly damped than that of a small and heavy foot
ing.
The theory developed in the preceding chapters is a
linear theory.
It therefore applies only as long as the dis
placements can be considered small as compared to the size
of the footing.
Also, it is assumed that the footing and the
soil are in physical contact at all times.
This means that
the soil reaction R(t) = P(t) + W must not become negative in
which case the footing will jump free of the ground,
This
latter limitation is of little consequence for practical design, since footings are usually dimensioned with a certain
safety factor against jumping.
However, several steadystate
test results have been published which indicate that jumping
occured during the tests and in some of these tests the deviations from the halfspace theory were considerable.
Only the vertical mode of vibration has been considered.
However, the nature of the energy dissipation for the other
83
modes (rocking, sliding, torsion) is basically the same as
that of the vertical mode, and it is therefore reasonable to
expect that simple springdashpot analogs can be developed
also for these modes.
Once these analogs have been developed
it will be a relatively simple matter to include the dynamic
characteristics of the foundation in the analysis of a superstructure with several degrees of freedom.
APPENDIX
REISSNER'S DISPLACEMENT FUNCTION
Reissner's surface displacement function was defined
on page 28 but will be repeated here for convenience:
oo
where
/y = Poisson's ratio
f (x) = (2x2l)24x2lx2s2 ~x2!
x
= The positive real root of f(x)
J and J.  Bessel functions of the first kind
o
1
The function f(x) is called the Rayleigh function.
It
can be shown that this function has only one real positive
root x , and that this root is slightly greater than unity.
Without going into details it should be mentioned that x
is the ratio between the velocity V s of shear waves and the
velocity VR of the Rayleigh surface waves for the elastic
half space.
The independent variables a and a
are^ according to
their definition,, always positive and real,, and so is the
integration parameter x.
84
The integral appearing in Eq. 158 is not directly suited
for numerical integration for the following reasons:
1)
The integrand is not defined in the point x = x
where f(x) has a root
2)
The interval of integration is infinite.
3)
The integrand is in general complex.
4)
At the point a
= a = 0 the integral can attain
infinitely many values,, depending on the manner
in which a and a
approach the origin.
Function Definitions
Fortunately all the above difficulties can be overcome.
In order to show this it is convenient first to consider the
behavior of the following functions, which are all related to
the Rayleigh function:
(159)
/ ^ X < oo
0 x s
(160)
/ ^ X. <
*.
 
, x
&
1) K 
(162)
The intervals shown with Eqs. 159 and 160 are the intervals in which the functions attain real values.
86
Also consider the following functions.:
, 0 ^X S
, / ^X <
(163)
(166)
(167)
^ X<
(168)
(x xo2) (169)
The intervals shown with the definitions are the intervals in which the functions attain real values.
The question
as to whether the functions are actually defined in all
points of the given intervals will be left to the subsequent
sections.
It is clear that the function f*(x) has no root greater
than s.
Hence, the function f**(x) has only one root x = x^
87
in the interval x > s. Eq. 168 shows that, since f**(x) is a
P
p
p
polynomial in x and has the root x = x , also P(x) is a
2
polynomial in x . Furthermore, since P(x) has no roots for x
greater than s the function h(x) is finite for all values of
x greater than unity.
By substitution of Eq. 169 into Eq. 167 we obtain:
(170)
x
or
(X3xQ)/?(x) + (x + XQ) h (2x0 
This function is not defined in the point x = x
(171)
where
both the numerator and the denominator have a root, but its
limit for xx
theorem.
exists and can be found by L'Hospital's
In order to show this we differentiate the numera
tor and the denominator of Eq,, 171 in the point x = x :
num ' (X)
den ' (x.0)
h fa ~4xh
~  4x0
(172)
(173)
and L'Hospital's theorem gives directly:
ilm
xx.
= h(x
' 0) 
(174)
Since h(x) is finite and has a finite derivative in the
point x = x o it is obvious that the limit exists. Hence, the
singularity of w(x) in the point x = x is removable and w
is continuous for all values of x greater than unity.
The
actual value of the limit can be determined., but it is of
no interest as the calculations can be planned in such a way
that it is not necessary to know this quantity.
P
For the special case s
the root x
= 
'
both f*(x) and f**(x) have
= \, and the functions r(x), t(x), and u(x) are
therefore not defined in this point.
However, also these
singularities can be removed, which is easily shown by
L'Hospital's theorem.
From what has been said up to this point it is a simple
matter to establish that the following functions are real,
finite and continuous in the intervals stated below:
0 ^x^s
o * x^y
(175)
,/ ^ x <
i^(x)
, y ^ x ^ x0
Separation of the Real and Imaginary Parts
Reissner's displacement function can be written as:
3*,
(176)
where g, and gp are the real and imaginary parts respectively
By simple complex algebra, which will not be repeated here,
it can be shown that:
./
00
(177)
89
and
(178)
(*)
where, according to Eq. 175, all the integrals are real.
The integrand v(x) is not defined in the point x = x ,
but this difficulty can be overcome by writing:
(179)
MT'(x)c// f / !/6<)c/x I 7T/?
where
f '"
77
C/X
(180)
is the remainder after cutting off the integration at some
large value K of the parameter x.
Substitution of Eq. 179 into Eq. 177 gives:
,1
4
(181)
In this formula, and in Eq. 178, all the integrands are
real and continuous in closed intervals of integration and
the integrals can therefore be evaluated by numerical integration if x
and K are given,
II
90
Calculation
of xO  and
f"~' (xO )* ^
""
' ""
L J
The root x
is most conveniently determined from f**(x)
by Newton's iterative method:
 f*&.
(182)
where
(i83)
This will yield the values of both x
and d(f**(x ))/d(x
and f'(x ) can then be calculated as follows:
By Eqs. 159 and 160:
(184)
By differentiation of Eq. l6l:
(185)
and finally by Eqs. 184 and 185:
f(Xo)
x0
tir
(186)
Asymptotic Expresslon_f_or v(x)
In order to determine the "cutoff" K and the remainder
R it is necessary to study the behavior of v(x) for large
values of x.
According to the definition of v(x) we have:
91
(187)
which is finite and real for x > x ~1.
It can be shown by
standard methods that:
(188)
+0
_ O
where o(x
_O
) stands for a term which decreases as x '' when
x * <=*=>, and a similar expression can be obtained for the
function bes(x) = J
(ax)
J, (a x) if the Bessel functions
are replaced by their asymptotic expansions:
(189)
7TCLX
37T)
(190)
which are valid for large values of ax and a x.
By multiplication of Eqs. 189 and 190 we find
(191)
+o
92
which can be reduced
to:
cos (a0a)x  sin (a0+g)x
& ax
sin(a0+a)x
(192)
Substitution of Eqs. 188 and 192 into Eq. 187 gives
finally the following asymptotic expression for v(x):
c4
'X'
[ sin aa)x  0^(0. + <z)x~
(193)
cos(aoa)x
where
(194)
(195)
(196)
expansion is not valid for a or a =0, and these cases
will therefore have to be investigated
separately:
the above method can be used to
show that the asymptotic expression for v(x) is:
(197)
93
where
(198)
(199)
The case a ; a
= 0, which corresponds to the case of
o
static loading, will be discussed on page 102.
Determination of K and R
Substitution of the above asymptotic expressions into
Eq. l80 gives the following formulas for the remainder R:
For a / 0, a / 0, K 1:
x2s>Ln(cL0cL)xclx  cf
J
J_
TT
(200)
K OS
K
For a = 0, a
K
/ 0., K ^> 1:
.00
R~
IT
(201)
Both these expressions contain integrals of the types:
(202)
and
m ,
X
dx
(203)
K
where m is greater than unity. These integrals can be evaluated as follows:
fl
First consider the case C<> 0, The integral I. can then
be written as:
g
/
where
(205)
and K, is chosen in such a way that
where N^ is a large integer.
The substitution x = u + (n + & ) 77/6<
reduces Eq, 205
to:
n mf
cos M da
(207)
95
since n + & >
0 this shows that the terms of the series in
Eq. 204 are of alternating sign.
By a well known theorem it
can therefore be concluded that the absolute value of the
series is smaller than its first term.
This value can be es
timated if we rewrite Eq. 20? in the form:
Ja'(
/ ~m ~\
n+p+^Wj sinu Ida (208)
mi
from which it can be seen that
1
(209)
Hence, by Eq. 206:
mTT
(210)
"<
This result can be generalized to cover also the case
when (X < o, provided Eq. 206 is replaced by:
Equations 204 and 210 show that the error made by assuming
96
that:
.(212)
I
is numerically smaller than
,=
(213)
provided K, is chosen according to Eq. 211.
Similarly it can be shown that the error made by replacing I
with:
(214)
is numerically smaller than:
mlT
o<
provided K
is chosen such that
'ir' <
where Np is a large integer,
(215)
97
Finally, by noting from Eqs. 211 and 216 that
(217)
<~K ^ loci
we conclude from Eq. 212 that the error made by neglecting
I
or I2 entirely is smaller than:
A,
(218)
Now let K, and K~ be two large numbers, which are
chosen in such a way that;
\a~a\
77A/,
<
ao +CL
(219)
where N^ is taken as the smallest integer which satisfies
this condition.
Then Eq. 200 can be written in the form:
4 : I x2cos(ac+a)xdx
=
(220)
J_
x c/x 
i? 
<X cos
ir
^2
')xc/x
98
Hence, by Eqs. 213, 215 and 218:
'
K,
s
xcos(a
c+a)x,dx
2\C<\
2\c<\
(221)
\Cz\
~~3
C3
laa\K2
whichj in connection with the approximation K ^ K^, shows
that the error made by putting:
  j x2cos(ao+a)xdx
(222)
is smaller than:
ii
73
aa.
(223)
or by Eqs. 138140:
.o
> ~~
i ^> 1
(224)
*4 =
It is a simple matter to verify that A h is smaller
than:
(225)
99
where a, is the smallest of the quantities a., :a<.,,; a a
And this expression for the error will be used in the following as it is much more convenient to work with than Eq. 224.
It is clear from Eq. 224 that the approximation Eq. 222
cannot be used for the calculation of R when a = a . A special formula is therefore needed for the casj; a = a ;
Substitution of a = a
into Eq. 200 gives:
OO
(226)
which, after evaluation of the second integral, reduces to:
R
2
(227)
Now if K, is chosen according to Eq. 219,, it can be
seen from Eqs. 213 and 218 that the error made by assuming
that:
a
(228)
is numerically smaller than:
H
(229)
100
1
or by Eqs. 194 and 196
0.2.
(230)
which is similar to Eq. 225.
The remainder for the case a = Oj,._a
0 is given
by Eq. 201 which in connection with Eqs. 215 and 2l8 shows
that:
tG
.sd
a
(231)
or by Eqs. 198 and 199:
0.75(232)
provided the "cutoff" K
is chosen such that:
(233)
where N, is a large integer.
Formulas for the Calculation of g, and gp
From the above expressions for the remainder it is
now a simple matter to set up procedures from which the function g, can be calculated to any given accuracy A . Depending on the values of a and a
following three cases:
we must distinguish between the
101
1)
a^O, aQ / 0, a ^ ao:
Choose two large Kvalues such that
A/2
a~
o a
where
(234)
a, = The smallest of the quantities a,a , aa
Np = A large integer
N, = The smallest integer which satisfies Eq. 234,
and calculate g, from:
.1
r**
w \uMdx + w
(235)
77
2)
aQ / 0, a 7^ 0, a = ao:
Choose a large Kvalue such that:
< K =
a \ 5 (/**) A
II
where N is a large integer, and calculate g
f236)
from:
~ I UMdt + if I W(ti c/X +
's
(237)
K
pM*^* 
4x  /
102
3)
a = 0,
0:
Choose a large Kvalue such that
(238)
where N is a large integer, and calculate g.. from:
/
+
W(X)C/X +
The function gp can for all values of a and a
(239)
be calcu
lated directly from Eq. 178,, which will be repeated here for
convenience:
All the functions appearing in the above formulas are defined on page Q^ and they are well behaved in the intervals
of interest.
The integrals can therefore be evaluated by nu
merical integration.
The Static Case
Reissner's displacement function is not defined in the
point a  a
and a
= 0, which according to the definition of a
corresponds to the case of static loading.
The vertical displacement of the surface for a uniform
static loading of intensity p
over a circular area is known
103
to be:
(241)
By comparing these with the following form of Eq. 50:
6 
(242)
it can be seen that if CU^0, while the ratio a/aQ  r/rQ is
kept constant, the components of g(a,a ) will approach the
limits:
f
JLimgz= V
(243)
^^
The elliptical integrals appearing in Eq. 243 cannot be reduced further, but it is known that their values lie in the
range 0 to 1 depending on the ratio a/a . Hence, the function
g
can attain any value in the range 0 to 1/77" (s l) in the
point a = a
= 0 , depending on the ratio between a and a
as
they approach zero.
The limits Eq. 243 are useful if it is wanted to tabulate g 1 for small values of a and a .
Instead of using a
104
and a
as entries in the table one can use a and a/a
a < a
or a , and a /a, if a
if
a . By this procedure g, is
transformed into a well behaved, single valued function and
the resulting tables are well suited for interpolation.
Numerical Calculations
A computer program was written for the procedures outlined on page 100 and the functions g, and g2 were evaluated
in the range O ^ a ^ 8 and O^.a^.8 for Poisson's ratio equal
to 1/3, using the formulas Eqs. 178 to 184.
A graphical
presentation of the results is given in Figs. 36 and 37.
Also a table of the type mentioned in the previous section was prepared on punched cards.
These cards made the
values of Reissner's function easily available, and they
formed part of the input for the computer program for the
ring method.
See page 32.
\ 6 A.7/ /,.8
Fig. 36
The Real Part of Reissner's
Surface Displacement Function
Fig. 37
The Imaginary Part of Reissner's
Surface Displacement Function
10?
APPENDIX
II
COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR IMPULSIVE LOADING
The computer program shown on the following pages is
written in the FORTRAN II language
Only the most basic
statements have been used and the program should therefore
be able to run on most modern computers with only minor
modifications.
The program calculates the dynamic response of the
footingsoil system shown in Fig. 10 due to the piecewise
linear pulse shown in Fig. 26b.
The method used is the
Fourier technique described in Chapter III,
The comment cards shown on page 109 explain how the
input should be arranged and two sets of output are shown
on pages 116 and 123.
These outputs correspond to the
curves shown in Figs. 28 and 35 respectively.
It should be noted that the program automatically generates an appropriate time interval for the final table
showing the actual response.
This time interval will al
ways come out as a "nice" number for easy plotting of the
response curves.
The program also determines the number m
of intervals in the pulse by locating the last nonzero
ordinate from the data.
Hence, the number m is not part of
the data as one might expect from the development in Chapter
108
III.
The controling variables 1 and g, EPS1 and EPS2 in
the program, are preset to the common value 0.05.
They can
be chosen smaller, but experience with the program has shown
that only a small gain in accuracy is achieved by doing so.
As a special feature the program checks the sign of the
soil reaction:
R(t) = Q(t)
(2*5)
where g  acceleration at gravity, to establish whether jumping occurs.
If R(t) is negative the acceleration in the
final table is printed out with an Fconversion instead of
the usual Econversion,
The subroutine shown on page 114 generates the displacement functions F
and F
for the halfspace model.
These
functions are shown graphically in Fig. 16 and numerically
in the table on page 115
The functions were evaluated for
Poisson's ratio equal to 1/3.
However, as shown on page 34,
the same subroutine can be used for all values of Poisson's
ratio.
The execution time varies with the number of points necessary to define the pulse, the duration of the pulse and the
choice of the preset variables EPS1 and EPS2.
The execution
times for the two data sets presented below were approximately 30 seconds each.
109
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
FORTRAN II PROGRAM TO CALCULATE THE D Y N A M I C RESPONSE OF A
R I G I D C I R C U L A R FOOTING RESTING ON AN ELASTIC HALFSPACE
CODED BY JOHN LYSMER* U N I V E R S I T Y OF M I C H I G A N * MARCH
1965
THE PROGRAM CONSISTS OF A M A I N PROGRAM PLUS A SUBROUTINE
WHICH YIELDS THE DISPLACEMENT FUNCTION F = Fl + I*F2
EACH DATA SET CONSISTS OF 11 CARDS AS FOLLOWS
CARD 1
(FT) RADIUS OF FOOTING
COLS. 1 10 R
(LB) WEIGHT OF FOOTING
COLS. 11 20 W
COLS. 21 30 GAMMA (PCF) DENSITY OF SOIL
(PSI) SHEAR MODULUS OF SOIL
COLS. 31 40 G
COLS. 41 50 MU
POISSONS RATIO OF SOIL
COLS. 51 60 D
(SEC) D U R A T I O N OF PULSE
(LB) FACTOR ON PULSE ORDINATES
COLS. 61 70 Q
COLS. 71 80 I D E N T I F I C A T I O N * MAY BE LEFT BLANK,
ANY CHARACTERS PUNCHED IN THESE COLUMNS
W I L L APPEAR AS A HEADING ON THE OUTPUT
CARD 2
COLS. 110
COLS. 1120
Yd)
Y(2)
COLS. 7180
Y(8)
FIRST NONZERO ORDINATE OF PULSE
AND SO ON UP TO
CARD 11
COLS.
COLS.
110
1120
COLS. 7180
Y(73)
Y(74)
Y(80)
THE DATA CAN BE PLACED ANYWHERE IN THE RESPECTIVE
FIELDS PROVIDED THE DECIMAL POINT IS PUNCHED.
ALL BLANK FIELDS ARE ASSUMED TO MEAN ZERO.
THE OUTPUT CONSISTS OF
1. A TABLE OF THE DISPLACEMENT FUNCTION USED
2. A PAGE SHOWING THE DATA AND CONSTANTS OF THE SYSTEM
3. A TABLE SHOWING THE M A G N I T U D E OF THE F O U R I E R TERMS
4. A TABLE OF DISPLACEMENTS. VELOCITIES* ACCELERATIONS
AND THE E X C I T I N G FORCE (FROM THE TRUNCATED FOURIER
SERIES). WHENEVER THE ACCELERATIONS ARE PRINTED IN
THE FORMAT XXXX.X INSTEAD OF THE USUAL X.XXXE+XX IT
MEANS THAT THE FOOTING JUMPS FREE OF THE HALFSPACE
AND THE RESULTS MUST BE TAKEN W I T H SOME R E S E R V A T I O N
THE CONSTANTS EPS1 AND EPS2 ARE PRESET TO
EPS1 = .05
EPS2 = .05
THEY CAN BE CHANGED BY CHANGING THE TWO PRECEEDING CARDS
110
DIMENSION Y(85)C( 400J.PSK 400)BN( 400)PHASE(
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
400)
TABLE OF DISPLACEMENT FUNCTION
A = 0.
CALL TABLE(1.F1F2)
1 CALL TABLE( A F 1 F 2 )
PRINT
100AF1F2
A = A+.2
READ INPUT FROM THE 11 DATA CARDS
2 READ
114RWGAMMAGPOISDQA1A2
READ
101(Y(I). 1=3.82)
CALCULATE BASIC CONSTANTS OF THE SYSTEM
V = SQRTF(G/GAMMA*4632.5)
SPRING = 576.*G*R/( l.POIS)
RV = R/V
RVD = RV/D
B = W/32.17/SPRING/RWRV
AJ = 2. LOGF(EPS1)*( .85+2 .6*6 ) *RVD
J = AJ
AJ = J
IF(B) 4.4,3
3 AN = l.+AJ/6.28/SQRTF(B*EPS2)/RVD
N = AN
AN = N
4 PJ = 3.14159265/AJ
FIND THE NUMBER OF INTERVALS IN THE PULSE
DO 6 I = 3.82
I F ( Y < I ) ) 56.5
5 M = I
6 CONTINUE
Ml = Ml
AM = Ml
DT = D/AM
C
C P R I N T DATA AND CONSTANTS
SPRING = SPRING/12.
PRINT
113.A1.A2
PRINT
102.R.W.G.GAMMA.POIS.V.SPRING.B
Yd) = 0.
Y < 2 ) = 0.
T = 0.
PRINT
108,D.Q
M2 = M + 1
Y(M2) = 0.
DO 7 I = 2.M2
LINE = 12
FORCE = Y(I)*Q
PRINT
103.LINE,TY(I).FORCE
Ill
IF(LINE26)7,367
36 PRINT
112
7 T = T+DT
IF ((LINE21)*(LINE25)) 42.42.43
42 P R I N T
112
43 P R I N T
111.EPS1.EPS2
c
c
c
c
c
c
CALCULATE FOURIER CONSTANTS FOR THE EXCITING FORCE
PRINT
109
Nl = N+l
DO 16 K = 1.N1
AK = K
H = PJ*(2.*AK1.)
ALFA = 0.
BETA = 0.
DO 8 I = l.M
AI = I
COEFF = 2 . * Y < I + 1 )  Y < I )  Y < 1 + 2 )
ANGLE = H*(AI1.)/AM
ALFA = ALFA+COEFF*COSF(ANGLE)
8 BETA = BETA+COEFF*SINF(ANGLE)
C(K) = 2.*Q*AM/AJ/H/H*SQRTF(ALFA*ALFA+BETA*BETA)
SWITCH = 1.
CALCULATE PHASE A N G L E
9 IF(ABSF(ALFA)ABSF(BETA)) 11.11.10
10 PHI = A T A N F (  B E T A / A L F A )
IF(ALFA) 12.13,13
11 PHI = 1.5707963ATANF(ALFA/BETA)
IF(BETA) 13.13,12
12 PHI = PHI+3.14159265
13 IF(SWITCH) 14.15.14
14 P S I ( K ) = PHI
CALCULATE FOURIER CONSTANTS FOR DISPLACEMENTS
A = H*RVD
CALL TABLE(A.F1 ,F2 )
FF = F1*F1+F2*F2
ALFA = F1/FFB*A*A
BETA = F2/FF
BN(K) = C(K)/SQRTF(ALFA*ALFA+BETA*BETA)/SPRING
SWITCH = 0.
GO TO 9
15 PHASE(K) = PSI(K)+PHI
IF(K 49) 16.41,37
37 IF(K103) 16,41,38
38 I F C K  1 5 7 ) 16,41,39
39 IF(K211 ) 16,41,40
40 IF(K265) 16,41,16
41 PRINT
112
PRINT
104,K,A,C(K),BN(K)
16
112
CALCULATION OF TIME INCREMENT
IF(B.5) 18,18,17
17 DT = RV/5.*SQRTF(B)
GO TO 19
18 DT = MAX1F(D/AM/2.D*AJ/100.)
19 ALOG = LOGF(DT)*.434294482+18.
CHR = INTF(ALOG)
ALOG = ALOGCHR
IF(ALOG.84) 20,20,25
20 IF(ALOG.SO) 21,21,24
21 IF(ALOG16) 22,22,23
22 DT = 10.**<CHR18.)
GO TO 26
23 DT = 10.**(CHR17.69897)
GO TO 26
14 DT = 10.**(CHR17.30103)
GO TO 26
25 DT = 10.**(CHR17.)
II
c
c
PRINT F I N A L TABLE OF DISPLACEMENTS ETC.
26 T = 0.
27 JUMP = 50
PRINT
105
28 IF(JUMP) 27,27,29
29 JUMP = JUMP 1
IF(TD*AJ) 30,30,35
30 ACCEL = 0.
DISPL = 0.
VLOCT = 0.
FORCE = 0.
DO 31 K = 1 N 1
AK = K
H = PJ* (2.*AK1,)/D
BNK = BN(K)
ANGLE = H*T+PHASE(K)
DISPL = DISPL + BNK* COSF(ANGLE)
VLOCT = VLOCT  BNK* SINF(ANGLE)*H
ACCEL = ACCEL  BNK* COSF(ANGLE)*H*H
31 FORCE == FORCE + C(K)*COSF(H*T+PSI(K))
IF(FORCE+W*(1.ACCEL/386.4))3332,32
32 PRINT
106T,DISPL,VLOCT,ACCEL,FORCE
GO TO 34
33 P R I N T
107,T,DISPL,VLOCT,ACCEL,FORCE
34 T = T+DT
GO TO 28
35 P R I N T
110
GO TO 2
113
100 FORMAT (21X.F3.1.2F15.5)
101 FORMAT (8F10.0)
1020FORMAT( 1H1/// 14X13HF 0 0 T I N G/ 14X 1 3 ( IH ) /17X
16HRADIUS19( IH, ) 3HR =F9.24H
FT/ 1 7X ,6HWEIGHT 19 ( IH. )
23HW =F9.24H
LB//14X.7HS 0 I L/ 14X 7 ( IH ) /
317Xtl3HSHEAR MODULUS 12 ( IH. ) 3HG =F9.25H PSI/17X.
428HDENSITY .............. GAMMA =F9.25H
PCF/17X,
528HPOISSONS R A T I O .......... MU = F9.4/17X*
628HSHEAR WAVE VELOCITY ...... V =F9.28H
FT/SEC//14Xt
711HS Y S T E M/14X11 (1HJ/17X,
828HSTATIC SPRING CONSTANT. ..K. = F9.09H LB/INCH/17X,
910HMASS R A T I O 1 5 ( IH. ) 3HB = F9.4/ )
103 FORMAT ( I 2 1 2X , 3 ( 1PE12 .3 ) )
104 FORMAT < I 1 8 3 ( 1PE14.3 ) )
1050FORMAT (1H1/// HXt32HT I M E DISPLACEMENT VELOCITY
122H
ACCELERATION
FORCE // 1 3 X 3 H S E C 7X,
241HINCHES
INCH/SEC
INCH/SEC/SEC
LBS / )
106 F O R M A T ( 7X 5 ( 1PE12 . 3 ) )
107 FORMAT ( 7X 3 ( 1PE12 .3 ) OPF 12. 1 1PE12 . 3 )
1080FORMAT (14X,9HP U L S E / 14X,9(1H)/
117X 28HDURATION ................. D =1PE10.35H
SEC /
217X. 28HFACTOR ON ORDINATES ...... Q =!PE10.3t5H LBS //
F O R C E
/
318X.41HPOINT
T I M E
ORDINATE
428X5H(SEC)19X5H(LBS)
/)
1090FORMAT (1H1///
24X28HF 0 U R I E R
S E R I E S /
124X28(1H )/
215X47HTERM
FREQUENCY
AMPLITUDE OF F O U R I E R TERM/
314X.48HNUMBER
RATIO
FORCE
DISPLACEMENT
4/17X,lHK8X4HA(K) 10X4HC(KJ 1 0 X 5 H B N ( K ) / )
110 FORMAT (1H1 ////10X18HLOOK FOR MORE DATA )
1110FORMATI1H0.13X15HA C C U R A C Y /14X15(IH)/
117X.6HEPS1 =F6.433H GOVERNS DISTANCE BETWEEN PULSES/
217X.6HEPS2 =F6.4.33H
GOVERNS NUMBER OF FOURIER TERMS)
112 F O R M A T (1H1 // )
113 FORMAT (1H1/// 34Xt2(A5)}
114 FORMAT (7F10.02(A5))
END
114
SUBROUTINE TABLE(AtFl,F2)
I F ( A ) 12.3
1 PRINT
100
1COOFORMAT(1H16(/)21X33HT A B L E
OF
Fl
AND
l / S 2 1 3 3 ( l H  ) / 2 3 X i 31H
HALFSPACE MODEL
2
23Xt
31H
POISSONS R A T I O = 1/3
3/22XlHA.12X.2HFl13X2HF2 /)
RETURN
2 Fl = 1.
F2 = 0.
RETURN
3 Y = A*A
IF( Al.) 4,4,5
4 Fl = l.Y#(,60000Y*.15000)
GO TO 6
5 Fl = (.25000 +<1.10000.80000/A)/A)/Y
6 IFU1.18) 7,7,8
7 F2 = A*(.78378Y*(,25800Y*.03030))
RETURN
8 F2 = (.95493+1,7873(1.6181.276/A)/A)/A)/A
RETURN
END
F2
/
/
Note:
The above subroutine
is a polynomial
approximation
to the displacement function F determined by the ring
method described in Chapter II.
values of Poisson's ratio.
It can be used for all
115
r.o
T A B L E
U F
Fl
A N D
F2
HALFSPACE MODEL
POISSONS RAT 10 = 1/3
r
L
Fl
.0
l.COOOO
.97624
.90784
.80344
.67744
.55000
.42438
.32018
.24414
.18957
.15000
.12081
.098B6
.08206
.06898
.05864
.05035
.04363
.03810
.03352
.02969
.02645
.02369
.02133
.01929
.01752
.01597
.01462
.01342
.01236
.01142
.01058
.00982
.00914
.00853
.00798
.00747
.00701
.00659
.00621
.00586
..
r
c
p
..
,
w
p
,
4.
p
W
.2
.4
.6
.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
6.2
6.4
6.6
6.8
7.0
7.2
7.4
7.6
7.8
3.0
F2
.CGOCO
.15470
.29731
.41690
.50486
.55608
.57003
.53791
.48961
.44341
.40314
.36888
.33979
.31495
.29357
.27501
.25874
.24437
.23159
.22014
.20982
.20047
.19195
.18416
.17700
.17040
.16429
.15861
.15333
.14841)
.14379
. 13947
.13540
.15157
. 12795
. 12454
.12130
.11823
. 11532
.11255
. 10991
116
TRAPEZUIO
F O O T I N G
RADIUS
WEIGHT
R =
5.00
W =483000.00
FT
LB
S O I L
SHEAR MODULUS
DENSITY
PCISSCNS R A T I O
SHEAR W A V E V E L O C I T Y
G
GAMMA
MU
V
=
=
=
=
2500.00
128.68
.3333
300.00
FT/SEC
STATIC SPRING CONSTANT...K =
MASS R A T I O
B =
9COOOO
5.0047
LB/INCH
PSI
PCF
S Y S T E M
P U L S E
L, \J l*t H t
& \.
A. v W*M
FACTOR ON O R D I N A T F ^
POINT
T I M E
(SEC)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
.OOOE G 0
5 .OOOE02
10 .OOOE02
1 .500E0 1
2 .OOOE0 1
2 .5COE0 1
3 .OOOE0 1
3 .500EG 1
4.COOE0 1
4.500E0 1
5 .OOOE0 1
5 .500E0 1
6.OOOE0 1
6.500E0 1
7.OOOE0 1
7.50QEG I
b .OCOE0 1
8 .500E0 1
9.OOCE0 1
9.500E0 1
10 .OOOE0 1
Q ::
ORDINATE
.OOOE
1 .OOOE
1 .COOE
1 .coot
1 .OOOE
1 .OOOE
1 .OOOE
1 .OOOE
1 .OOOE
1 .OOOE
1 .OOOE
1 .oooe
i .oooe
1 .OOOE
1 .oooe
i .OOOE
1 .OOOE
1 .OOOE
1 .COOE
1 .CODE
.OOOE
WV
?.snr:F r.s
CO
00
00
CO
00
00
CO
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
CO
00
00
00
00
o L.
1 A
F 0 R C E
UBS )
.OCCE
2 .500E
2 .5COE
2.5COE
2.5COE
2 .500E
2 .5COE
2 .5COE
2 .5GOE
2.5COE
2 .5CCE
2.500E
2 .5COE
2 .5COE
2 .5CCE
2 .5COE
2 .500E
2 .soot
2 .5CCE
2 .5COE
.OCOE
CO
C5
C5
05
05
C5
C5
05
05
C5
05
05
05
C5
05
05
05
05
C5
05
CO
A C C U R A C Y
EPS1 = .0500
EPS2 = .0500
GOVERNS DISTANCE BETWEEN PULSES
GOVERNS N U M B E R UF FOURIER TERMS
117
F O U R I E R
TERM
NUMtiER
K
2
3
*t
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
S E R I E S
FREQUENCY
RATIO
A(K)
A M P L I T U D E UF F O U R I E R TERM
FORCE
DISPLACEMENT
BN(K)
C(K
2.618E02
7.854E02
1.309E01
1.833E01
2.356E01
2.160E
8.313E
3.514E
3.918E
1.450E
2.631E
6.361E
1.963E
2.C41E
1.523E
2.880E01
3.403E01
3.927E01
4.451E01
4.974E01
5.498E01
6.021E01
6.545E01
7.069E01
7.592E01
8.116E01
8.639E01
9.163E01
9.687E01
1.021E 00
1.073E 00
1.126E 00
1.178E 00
1.230E 00
1.283E 00
1.335E 00
1.3H8E 00
1.440E 00
1.492E 00
1.545E 00
1.597E 00
1.649E 00
1.7U2E 00
1.754E 00
1.806E 00
1.859E 00
1.911E 00
1.963E 00
2.016E 00
2.068E 00
5.299E
1.1 95E
2.104E
9.337E
3.030E
7.186E
3.5COF
5.396E
3.640E
3.910E
3.538E
2.695E
3.264E
1.726E
2.876E
9.79SE
2.423E
4.347E
1.946L
6.713E
1.478E
1.486E
1.045E
2.395F
6.687E
2.330E
3.602L
1.562E
1.262L
3.461E
05
04
04
04
04
04
03
04
03
04
02
04
03
03
03
03
03
03
C3
03
03
03
03
03
03
02
03
02
03
01
03
02
03
02
02
02
02
02
02
01
2.4C8EC1
9.513E02
4.245EG2
5.159EC2
2.163EC2
4.664E02
1.416E02
5.596EC2
6.2C4E03
3.511EC2
8.406EC4
1.357E02
1.801EC3
6.279E03
1.651EC3
3.249E03
1.339EC3
1.772E03
1.040E03
9.824E04
7.885E04
5.369EC4
5.852EC4
2.8C2EC4
4.255E04
1.327E04
3.01 8EC<+
4.997E05
2.C71E04
6.640EC6
1.361EC4
1.279E05
8.422EC5
1.810EC5
4. 753EC5
1.560EC5
2.276E05
9.328EG6
7. 135E06
I.B56E06
118
T I M E
DISPLACEMENT
VELOCITY
ACCELbRA TION
SEC
INCHES
INCH/SEC
INCH/SEC /SEC
.OOOE 00
l.OOOE02
2.0GOE02
3.000E02
4.0GOE02
5.000E02
6.000E02
7.000E02
8.0GOEG2
9.000E02
1.000EG1
1. 100E01
1.2GOEC1
1.300E01
1.4GGE01
1.500E01
1.6COE01
1.700E01
1.800E01
1.9COE01
2.00GL01
2. 100E01
2.2GOE01
2.300E01
2.400EG1
2.50GE01
2.60GEG1
2.700E01
2.dGGEGl
2.9COEG1
3.000EG1
3. 100FG1
3.200E01
3.300EG1
3.40GE01
3.500E01
3.6GGEG1
3.70GE01
3.8GOE01
3.9GOE01
4. 000 E 01
4.100E01
4.2UOE01
4.300EG1
4.400EG1
4.500EG1
4.600E01
4.70UE01
4.8GOE01
4.900E01
4.276F05
1.729F03
6.839E03
1.847E02
3.947F02
7.123E02
1.130EG1
1.620E01
2.145E01
2.664E01
3.142E01
3.551E01
3.870E01
4.087E01
4.196E01
4.198E01
4.105E01
3.932L01
3.696L01
3.421E01
3.120E01
2.838E01
2.571E01
2.342EQ1
2.164&01
2.044E01
1.984E01
1.933EG1
2.G36EG1
2.134E01
2.266E01
2.420E01
2.584E01
?.746E01
2.89&EG1
3.023EG1
3.122E01
3. 189E01
3.222E01
3.222FG1
3.192E01
3.137E01
3.063h01
2.977E01
2.385E01
2.794EOL
2.711E01
2.640601
2.584EG1
2.547LG1
8.345E02
2.924E01
7.831E01
1.592E Ou
2.632E 00
3.707E 00
4.599E 00
5.144E 00
5. 28 IE GO
5.036E 00
4.474E 00
3.671E OG
2.698E 00
1.629E 00
5.463E01
4.729E01
1.363E 00
2.G79E 00
2.590E 00
2.880E 00
2.950E 00
2.814E GO
2.500E 00
2.048E 00
L.501E 00
9.024E01
2.979E01
2.712E01
7.690EG 1
1.169E 00
1.A53E 00
1.613E 00
1.651E 00
1.573E 00
1.396E GO
1.142E GO
8.350E01
5.000E01
1.621E01
1.558E01
4.338EC1
6.567E01
8.148E01
9.G36E01
9.235E01
8.793E01
7.799E01
6.372E01
4.648E01
2.770E01
1.036E
3.348E
6.537E
9.497E
1.09?>E
1.018E
7.371E
3.428E
6.33CE
4. Lb3E
6.942E
9.002E
1.034C
1.089E
1.063E
9.641E
8.C91E
6.168E
4.023E
L. 793E
3.698E
2.308E
3.898F
5.072E
5.804E
6.087E
5.934E
5.3H7E
4.524E
3.^39E
2.230E
9.819E
2.219E
L.3G2E
2.193E
2.849E
3.25^E
3.405E
3.315E
3.009E
2.526E
1.917E
1.238E
5.385L
1.333E
7.353E
1.2i2E
1.599t
1.825E
1.907E
01
01
01
01
02
02
01
01
CO
01
Cl
01
02
02
C2
01
Cl
01
01
01
CO
01
01
Cl
01
01
01
Gl
01
01
01
CO
CO
01
Cl
01
01
01
01
Cl
01
01
Cl
CO
CO
CO
01
01
Cl
01
FURCE
LB
1.215E
A.497E
9.b85E
1.541E
2.05CE
2.379E
2.514E
2.525E
2.499E
2.483E
2.496E
2.505E
2.505E
2.499E
2.A96E
2.499E
2.502tE
2.502E
2.A99E
2.498E
2.5COE
2.501E
2.501E
2.50CE
2.499E
2.500E
2. 50 IE
2.5G1L
2.5.COE
2.499E
2.5COE
2.50CE:
2.500E
2.500E
2.5GOE
2.500E
2.'iCCE
2.5COE
2.500fc
2.3COF
2.500
2.bOOE
2.500c
2.5COE
2.5GCF
2.5COE
2.500t
2.SQOF
2.SCOE
2.500t
04
OA
04
05
05
05
05
05
C5
05
05
05
C5
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
C5
05
05
05
C5
05
05
05
05
05
C5
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
C5
O'S
05
119
L
_.
T I M E
DISPLACEMENT
VELOCITY
ACCELERATION
FORCE
SEC
INCHES
INCH/SEC
INCH/SEC/SEC
LB
2.529E0 1
2.529E0 1
2. 546E0 1
2. 577E0 1
2.619E0 1
2.667E0 1
2.719E0 1
2. 769E0 1
2.816E0 1
2. 856E0 1
2. 88bE0 1
2.907E0 1
2.917E0 1
2.917E0 1
2. 907E0 1
2.890E0 1
2.866E0 1
2.839E0 1
2.810E0 1
2.782E0 1
2.756E0 i
2. 734E0 I
2. 717E0 1
2.705E0 1
2.70GE0 1
2. 700E0 L
2. 705E0 I
2.715EG 1
2.728E0 1
2.744E0 1
2. 760E0 1
2.776E0 1
2.79GE0 1
2.802E0 1
2.812E0 1
2.818E0 1
2.822E0 1
2.821E0 1
2. 818E0 1
2.813E0 1
2.806E0 1
2. 798E0 I
2. 788E0 1
2.778E0 1
2. 77GE0 1
2.763E0 1
2.745E0 1
2.694E0 1
2.579E0 1
2.371E0 1
8.798E02
8. 952EG2
5.000E01
5.100E01
5.200E01
5.300E01
w 5.400E01
5.500E01
5.600E01
5.700E01
5.800E01
5.900E01
6.0GGE01
6.1GOEG1
6.200E01
6.300E01
6.400EG1
6.500E01
r. 6.600E01
6.700E01
6.800E01
^
6.90GE01
7.00GEG1
i*.*
7. 1GOE01
7.200E01
7.300E01
L/ 7.400E01
7.5GOE01
; 7.6GOE01
7.7GOE01
^ 7.8GGEG1
f~ 7.90GEG1
\tau 8.0GOE01
8.100E01
8.200E01
8.30GE01
8.400E01
8.500E01
8.600E01
8. 700E01
8.800E01
8.900E01
9.000EG1
9. 100E01
9.200E01
9.3GGEG1
9.400E01
9.500E01
9.600EG1
9.700E01
9.800E01
9.900E01
r
U
/
'
V...
L
*
L
,
"
\.
L
f~
^
,
i*.
r
L
2.446E01
3. 689EG1
4. 570E01
5. 062E01
5. 166E01
4. 914E01
4. 355E01
3. 555E01
2. 589E01
1. 536E01
4.760E02
5. 159E02
1. 379E01
2.071EG1
2. 563E01
2.837E01
2. 892E01
2. 744E01
2.428E01
1.982E01
1.445E01
8. 547EG2
2. 569E02
3. 003EG2
7. 785E02
1. 159E01
1.434EG1
i. 595EG1
1.627E01
i. 534E01
1. 344E01
1. 096EGI
8. 105E02
4.859E02
1. 337EG2
1.955E02
4.426E02
6.054E02
7.490E02
9. 131E02
1.OllEOi
9.012EG2
6. 759E02
9. 735EG2
2.949EU1
7 750E01
575E OU
2.608E GO
i.
1. 853E 01
1. 679E 01
1.4C9E 01
1. G69E 01
6. 880E CO
2. 954E CO
8.089E01
4. 159E CO
6.913E CO
a.959E CO
i. 023E 01
i. 070E 01
i.037E 01
9.364E CO
7. 837E CO
5.955E GO
3. 844E CO
1. 633E CO
5. 075E01
2. 334E GO
3. 877E CO
4.977E CO
5. 704E GO
6. 021E 00
5. 853E CC
5.226E CO
4.3G9E GO
3. 287E GO
2.2G2E CO
9.837EC1
3.258E01
1. 482E GO
2.249E CO
2.678E CO
3. 045E CO
3. 434E GO
3. 520E CC
2.952E CO
1. 982E CO
1.4GOE CO
1. 560E CO
" 1 568E
CO
1. 056E01
2. 216E CO
1. 226E CC
9. 196E GO
3. 237E 01
6.438E 01
9.416E Cl
1.G89E 02
2.5GOE
2.500E
2.5CGE
2.5GOE
2.500E
2.5GOE
2.500E
2.500E
2.500E
2.500E
2.5GOE
2.5COE
2.500E
2.500E
2.500E
2.5GOE
2.500E
2.5GGE
2.50CE
2.5GOE
2.500E
2.499E
2.5COE
2.501E
2.5G1E
2.5GOE
2.499E
2.500E
2.5C1E
2.5G1E
2.500E
2.498E
2.499E
2.502E
2.5G2E
2.499E
2.496E
2.499E
2.505E
2.505E
2.496E
2.488E
2.499E
2.525E
2.514E
2.379E
2.C50E
1.541E
9.586E
4.497E
05
05
05
05
05
C5
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
G5
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
G5
05
05
04
04
120
i y
DISPLACEMENT
VELOCITY
ACCELERATION
SEC
INCHES
INCH/SEC
INCH/SEC/SEC
10. OOOF 01
1. OlCJE 00
i. 020E (JO
1. 03UE 00
1. 040E 00
1. 050E 00
1. 060E 00
1. 070E 00
1. 080E 00
1. 090E 00
I. 100E 00
I. L10E 00
1. 120E 00
I. 130E 00
1. 140E 00
1. 150E 00
1. 160E 00
1. 170E 00
1. 180E 00
L. 190E 00
1. 200E 00
1. 210E 00
1. 220E 00
1. 230E 00
L. 240E 00
1. 250E 00
1. 260E 00
1. 270E 00
1. 280E 00
1. 290E 00
1. 300E 00
I. 3LOE 00
L. 320E 00
1. 330E 00
1. 340E 00
1. 350E 00
L. 360E 00
1. 370E 00
1. 380E 00
1. 390E 00
I. 400E 00
1. 410E 00
1. 420E 00
1. 430E 00
1.440E CO
1.450E 00
1. 460E 00
1. 470E 00
1.480E 00
L. 490E 00
2.057E01
1.642E01
1.155E01
6.330E02
1. 170E02
3.585E02
7.658E02
1.084E01
1.301E01
1.409E01
1.413E01
1.321E01
1.149E01
9.153E02
6.417E02
3.501E02
6.175E03
2.040E02
4.315E02
6.089E02
7.291E02
7.891E02
7.903E02
7.383E02
6.413E02
5.102E 02
3.569E02
1.936E02
3.237E03
1.161E02
2.431E02
3.419E02
4.087E02
4.418E02
4.421E02
4. 126E02
3.580E02
2.844E02
1.985E02
1.071E02
1.691E03
6.608E03
1.369E02
1.920E02
2.291E02
2.474E02
2.473E02
2.306E02
1.998E02
1.585L02
3. 679E 00
4. 568E 00
5. 112E 00
5. 252C 00
5.010E 00
4.454E 00
3.657E 00
2.690E 00
1. 628E 00
~~ J &09E01
4.633E01
1. 350E CO
2.062E 00
2. 572E 00
2. 863E 00
2. 934E 00
2. 800E 00
2. 48 9E 00
2. 040E 00
1.497E 00
9. 019E01
3. 005E01
2. 658E01
7.614EOL
1. 159E 00
1. 443E 00
1.603E 00
1.64 2E 00
1. 565E 00
I.390E 00
1. 138E 00
a. 327E01
4.998E01
1. 636E01
1. 328E01
4.296E01
6.516EOL
8.092E01
8. 980E01
9. 184E01
8.750E01
7. 764E01
6. 346E01
4.634E01
2. 770E01
8.907E02
8. 777E02
2.424E01
3. 663E01
4. 539E01
1. 014E
7. 359E
3.439E
6. 028E
4. 112E
6. 884E
8. 938E
1. 028fc
1. 083E
1. 058E
9. 596E
8. 057E
6. 148E
4.01 7E
1. 799E
3. 529E
2. 283E
3. 866E
5. 036E
5. 767E
6. 053E
5. 904E
5. 363E
4. 505E
3. 428E
2. 227E
9. 866E
2. 117E
1. 289E
2. 176E
2. 829fc
3. 232E
3. 385E
3. 299E
2. 996E
2. 515E
1. 9C9E
1. 235E
5. 419E
1. 260E
7. 273E
1. 224E
1. 589E
1. 81 IE
1. 89AE
1.844E
1. 674E
1. <*Q5E
1. 063E
6. 841E
02
01
01
CO
01
01
01
02
02
02
01
01
01
01
01
CO
01
01
01
01
01
01
Cl
01
01
01
CO
cc
01
01
01
Cl
01
01
Cl
01
01
01
CO
CO
CO
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
CO
FURCE
LB
1. 215E
1.4C9E
2. 5G7E
8. 907t
1. 184E
3. 678E
5.401E
4. 577t
1. 466E
3. 801E
8. 059E
2. 357E
1. 793E
8. 644E
1. 838E
2. 934F.
1. 3C9E
9. 448E
5. 553E
1. 086E
1. 363E
8. 395E
5. 858L
3. 897E
7.257E
7. 261E
5. 943L
4. 044t
2.947E
5. 304E
4. 174E
4. 549E
3. 029E
2. 381E
4. 169E
2.457C
3. 724E
2.428E
2. 050E
3. 501L
I. 386E
3. 251h
2. 078F
1. 873E
3. 129E
6. 108E3. 017E
1. 890t
1. 822E
2. 974C
04
03
03
01
03
02
02
02
02
02
01
C2
02
01
02
Cl
02
01
01
C2
01
01
01
01
01
00
01
01
01
01
00
01
Cl
01
Cl
CO
01
01
Cl
01
CG
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
121
T I M E
DISPLACEMENT
VELOCITY
ACC6L6KA TIOIM
FORCE
SEC
INCHES
INCH/SEC
INCH/SEC /SEC
LB
1. 500E 00
1. 5106 00
1. 520E 00
1. 103602
5.921E03
8.784604
3.759E03
7.713603
1.078F02
1.284602
1.385602
1.383602
1.289602
1.116602
8.835E03
6.136603
3. 274603
4. 542604
2.138603
4.347E03
6.056603
7.197603
7.752603
7.736603
7.201603
6.227E03
4.923603
3.410603
1.811603
2.372604
1.213E03
2.450603
3.404603
4.036603
4.338603
4.327603
4.028603
3.480E03
2.739603
1.836603
9.965604
1.280604
6.802604
1.382603
1.918603
2.253603
2.403603
2.415603
2,303603
2.017603
1.535603
9.700604
4.986604
5.029601
5. 138601
4. 891601
4. 336601
3. 539601
2.578601
1. 535601
4.852602
L. 5306
1. 540E
1. 550E
1. 56CE
1. 570E
1. 580E
1. 5906
1. 600E
1.610E
1. 6206
1.6306
1. 6406
i. 650E
1. 660E
1. 670E
1.680E
1. 690E
1. 7006
1. 7106
1. 720E
1. 730E
1. 740E
1. 750E
1.7606
1.770E
1.7806
1. 7906
1. 8006
1. 810E
1. 8206
l. 8306
1. 840E
I. 850E
1. 8606
1. 8706
1. 8806
l. 8906
1. 9006
1. 9106
1.9206
1. 9306
1. 9406
1. 9506
1. 9606
l. 9706
l. 9806
1. 9906
00
00
00
00
00
00
CO
00
00
00
00
CO
00
CO
00
CO
00
00
00
00
uO
00
00
CO
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
5.024E02
I. 367E01
2.059601
2. 546E01
2. 816601
2. 074601
2. 735E01
2.423E01
1. 974E01
1. 433601
8.479602
2. 633602
2.864602
7.703E02
1. 159601
1. 429601
1. 575601
1.604601
1. 528601
1. 357601
1. 105601
7.963602
4.654602
1.419602
1. 596602
4. 312602
6. 564E02
8. 110E02
8.829602
3.861E02
8.447602
7. 640602
6. 286602
4. 380602
2. 348602
7. 342603
4.609603
1. 881602
3.888602
5. 557602
5. 381E02
4.213602
2. 968E CO
7.474E Cl
4. 101E CO
6. 886E cc
8. 9306 CO
1.0156 01
1. 058E 01
1. 029E 01
9. 3576 CO
7. 8566 cc
5. 931E CO
3. 785E CO
1. 6186 CO
4. 370601
2. 2996 CO
3. 872E CO
5. 037E cc
5. 7106 00
5.911E CO
5.7256 CO
5.219E CO
4.4086 CO
3. 3216 CO
2.0806 CO
R 5336 01
2. 548E 01
1. 2496 CO
2. 1446 CO
2. 8596 00
3. 2586 CO
3. 3106 00
3. 138E CO
2. 8816 CO
2. 5236 CO
1.9386 CO
1. 1316 CO
3.3336 01
2. 2356 01
5.944601
1. 0526 CO
1. 6646 00
2. 071E CO
1. 8886 CO
1. 336E oc
1. 1806 00
1. 7446 CO
2. 1066 CO
9.2606 Cl
1. 1966 cc
9. 231602
2. 011602
2. 9816 01
1. 8296 01
I. 8846 01
3. 0126 01
6. 524601
3. 1326 01
1. 879E 01
2. 0736 01
3. 2456 01
1.4326
00
3. 5046
2. 0556
2. 4246
3. 7216
2. 5216
4. 1756
2. 3886
3. 0236
4. 5446
4. 2096
5. 307E
2. 9536
4. 0386
5. 9406
7. 2986
7.2616
3. 9036
5. 8516
8. 3876
1. 3706
1. 0866
5. 560t
9.4406
1. 3096
2. 9346
1. 8386
8.6526
1. 7926
2. 3566
8.0596
3. 8026
1.4676
4. 5766
01
01
01
01
00
01
01
01
01
00
01
01
01
01
00
01
01
01
01
01
02
Cl
01
02
01
02
01
02
02
01
02
02
02
5.4026 02
6776 02
3.
1. 1846 03
8. 9436 01
2. 5066 03
1.4096 03
122
T I M E
DISPLACEMENT
VELOCITY
ACCELERATION
SEC
INCHES
INCH/SEC
INCH/SEC/SEC
Z.OOOE 00
4.272E05
8.344E02
LOOK FOR MORE DATA
1.036E 01
FORCE
L6
1.21^E
123
TEST
T3
F O O T I N G
RADIUS
WEIGHT
R =
W =
.50
239.90
FT
Lti
S O I L
SHEAR MODULUS
DENSITY
PCISSONS R A T I O
SHEAR W A V E VELOCITY
G
GAMMA
MU
V
=
=
=
=
42CO.OO
109.00
.2500
422.49
STATIC SPRING CONSTANT...K =
MASS R A T I O
9 =
1344CC
3.3014
PSI
PCF
FT/ShC
S Y S T E M
LB/INCH
P U L S E
DURATION
FACTOR ON O R D I N A T E S
D = 2.050E02
Q = 4.970E 00
POINT
T I M E
(SEC)
ORDINATE
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
.OOOE 00
5.000E04
10.000F04
1.500E03
2.000E03
2.500E03
3.00CE03
3.500E03
4.000E03
4.500EG3
5.0'JOE03
5.500E03
6.000E03
6.500E03
7.000E03
7.500E03
8.000E03
8.500E03
9.000E03
9.500E03
10.000t03
1.050E02
1.100E02
1.150E02
1.200E02
1.250E02
1.300E02
00
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
00
00
01
01
01
00
00
CO
00
CO
00
CO
6 , C O O E CO
7 ,000b CO
3.OOOE CO
.0006
4 ,500E
6 , loot
5 200E
4 ,800E
5 .200E
6 800E
7 400E
7 .OOOE
5 ,200E
2 .900E
1 3COE
1 .COOE
1 ,OOOE
1 ,700E
2 OC'OE
1 , 30OE
5 .0006
3 OOOE
6 , C C O E
2 , O O O E
5 ,0006
Z , 00 OE
3 , O O O E
SEC
LBS
0 R C E
(LBS)
CCCE
2, 236E
3. 032E
2. 584E
2, 386E
2. 564E
3. 380E
3.678E
3.479E
2.584E
1.441E
6.461E
4.970E
4 970E
8 449E
9 940E
6 461E
2 485E
1 491E
2 982E
9 940E
2 485E
9.940E
1.491E
2.982E
3.479E
1.491E
CO
02
02
02
02
02
C2
C2
C2
C2
02
01
CO
CO
Cl
Cl
Cl
01
01
01
CO
01
cc
01
01
Cl
01
124
27
1.350E02
28
29
1.4UOE02
1.450E02
1.500E02
1.550E02
1.600E02
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
1.650E02
1.700EG2
1.750E02
1.800E02
1.850E02
1.900hU2
1.950G02
2.0COEG2
2.050E02
3.0COE GO
3.000E 00
.coot CO
6.000E 00
7.000E oe
2.000E 00
5.000E 00
4.000E CO
3. 00 OF. 00
4.00CE 00
2.000E 00
2.000E 00
4.000E 00
2.000E 00
.OOOE 00
1.491E 01
1.491E Cl
.CCOE CO
2.982E 01
3.479E
9.940E
2.485E
1.988E
1.491E
1.988E
9.940E
9.940E
1.988E
9.940E
.CCOE
Cl
CO
Cl
Cl
01
01
CO
CO
01
CO
CO
A C C U R A C Y
EPS1 = .0500
EPS2 = .0500
GOVERNS DISTANCE B E T W E E N PULSES
GOVERNS N U M B E R OF F O U R I E R TERMS
125
F O U R I E R
TERN
NUMBER
K
1
2
3
<i
5
6
?
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
S E R I E S
FREQUENCY
RATIO
A(K)
AMPLITUDE OF FOURIER TERM
DISPLACEMENT
FORCE
C(K)
ON(K)
6.045E02
1.814E01
3.023E01
4.232E01
5.441E01
6.650EC1
7.db9ECl
9.068E01
1.028E 00
1.149E 00
1.270E 00
1.390E 00
1.511E 00
1.632E 00
1.753E 00
1.S74E 00
1.995E 00
2.116E 00
2.237E 00
2.338E 00
2.479E 00
2.600E 00
4.815E
4.749E
4.581E
4.170L
3.494F.
2.827E
2.397E
2.041E
1.659E
1.392E
1.178E
8.572E
5.174E
3.387E
4.453E
6.705E
8.231E
1.027E
1.336E
1.433E
1.087t
4.373E
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
CO
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
00
3.623E04
3.916E04
4.624EC4
5.844EC4
5.70CE04
2.799E0^
1.383EC4
7.716E05
4.473EC5
2.830E05
1.883EG5
1.113EC5
5.584E06
3.090E06
3.485EG6
A.349E06
A.892E06
3.392E06
6.2A7EC6
6.C02EC6
4.105E06
1.497EOfa
126
T I M E
DISPLACEMENT
VELOCITY
ACCELERATION
FORCE
SEC
INCHES
I NCH/SEC
INCH/SEC/SEC
LB
.OOOE 00
5.000E04
l.OOOE03
1.500E03
2.000E03
2.5UOE03
3.000E03
3.5UQE03
4.0GOE03
4.500E03
5.000E03
5.500E03
6.000E03
6.500E03
7.000E03
7.500E03
8.000E03
8.500E03
9.000E03
9.500E03
l.OOOE02
1.050E02
L.100E02
1.150E02
1.20CE02
1.250E02
1.300E02
1.350E02
l.OOOE02
1.450E02
1.500E02
i.550E02
1.600E02
1.650EG2
1.7UOE02
1.750E02
1.800E02
1.850E02
1.900E02
1.950E02
2.000E02
2.050E02
2.100E02
2.150E02
2.200E02
2.250E02
2.300E02
2.350E02
2.4UOEG2
2.450E02
2.649E06
3.112E05
1.278E04
3.007E04
5.427E04
8.344E04
1.159E03
1.508E03
1.875E03
2.237E03
2.549E03
2.759E03
2.827E03
2.75GE03
2.554^03
2.276E03
1.95GE03
1.582E03
1. 177E03
7.455E04
3.114E04
9.468E05
4.499E04
7.452E04
9.808E04
1.157E03
1.267E03
1.305E03
1.270E03
1.173E03
1.031E03
8.605E04
6.707E04
4.676F04
2.581E04
5.379E05
1.320L04
2.889EG4
4.130E04
5.054E04
5.680E04
6.010E04
6.032E04
5.748E04
5.192E04
4.425E04
3.517E04
2.531E04
1.518E04
5.261E05
2 .246EG2
1 .226E01
2 .687E01
4.203E01
5 .406E01
6.203E01
6.755E01
7.201E01
7 .394E01
6 .915E01
5 .391E01
2 .865E01
1 .274E02
2 .858E01
4.849E01
6. 106E01
6.971E01
7 .745E01
8 .426E01
8.756E01
8 .498E01
7 .667E01
6.513E01
5 .303E01
4.126E01
2 .891E01
1 .501E01
1 . 194E03
I .372E01
2 .450E01
3 .170E01
3 .628E01
3 .947E01
4.156E01
4. 182E01
3 .944E01
3 .451E01
2 .813E01
2 . 158E01
1 .546E01
1. 382E
2. 570E
3. 128E
2.806E
1'. 977E
1.276E
02
1. 261E
1. 930E
4. 1C4E
5. 759E
5. 952E
4. 803E
3. 168E
1. 988E
1. 581E
1. 514E
1. 115E
1. 175E
1. 144E
01
02
02
02
02
02
02
9. 875E 01
7. 471E 01
2.089E
2.43 IE
2. 379E
2. 367E
2. 612E
2.929E
2. 952E
2. 510E
1. 786E
1. 130E
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
01
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
7.460E 01
5.40 3E 01
2. 698E
1. 966E
7. 546E
1. 177E
I. 329E
1. 273E
1. 184E
9.589E02 1. 180E
3 .551E02 1. 236E
2 .676EG2 1. 236E
8 .573E02 1. 099E
1 . 346EOL 8. 448E
1 .697E01 5. 594E
1 .912E01 3. 105E
2 .G15E01 1. 060E
8. 236E
2 .021E01
2. 715E
1 .932E01
01
01
01
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
01
01
01
01
CO
01
8. 378E 01
I. 779E 02
2. 483E 02
2. 741E 02
2. 715E 02
2. 768E 02
3. G90E 02
3.473E 02
3. 459E 02
2. 759E 02
1. 568E 02
4.729E 01
8. 385E01
2.441E 01
7. 532E 01
9.862E Cl
7. 153t 01
1. 704E 01
2.216E 01
2.289E 01
1. 432E 00
1. 837E 01
8. 628E CO
1. 794E 01
3. 535E 01
2. 801E 01
4. 680E CO
1. 195E 01
7. 743E 00
1. 066E 01
2.42 3E 01
2.052E 01
4. 350E 00
8. 729E CO
8. 100E 00
2. 786E CO
1. 142E 01
8. 890E 00
2. 4S4E 00
1. 264E 01
1. 396E 01
7. 186E 00
7.42CE01
3. 83CE 00
1.908E 00
1. 260E CO
2. 154E 00
6. 534E01
I. 028E 00
1.201L
oc
127
T I M E
DISPLACEMENT
VELOCITY
ACCELERATI N
FURCE
SEC
INCHES
INCH/SEC
INCH/SEC/S C
LB
2.5GOE02
2.550E02
2.600E02
2.650E02
2.700E02
2.750E02
2.800E02
2.850E02
2.900E02
2.950E02
3.000E02
3.050E02
3.100E02
3.150E02
3.200E02
3.250E02
3.300E02
3.350E02
3.400E02
3.450E02
3.500E02
3.55GE02
3.6GJE02
3.650E02
3.700E02
3.750E02
3.80UE02
3.850E02
3.900E02
3.950E02
4.000E02
4.050E02
4. 100EC2
4.1rJOE02
4.200E02
4.250E02
4.300E02
4.350E02
4.4GCE02
4.450E02
4.500E02
4.550E02
4.600E02
4.650E02
4.700E02
4.750E02
4.800E02
4.850E02
4.900E02
4.950E02
3.986E05
1.213E04
1.884E04
2.392E04
2.731EQ4
2.902E04
2.912EOA
2.776E04
2.515E04
2.153E04
1.719E04
1.242E04
7.505E05
2.712E05
1.738E05
5.671E05
8.951E05
I.L47E04
1.315E04
1.399E04
1.403E04
1.342E04
1.220E04
1.05GE04
8.410E05
6.083E05
3.690E05
1.382E05
7.4i35E06
2.642E05
4.258E05
5.519E05
6.351E05
6.741E05
6.747E05
6.455E05
5.9L5E05
5.132E05
4.121E05
2.963E05
1.787E05
6.992E06
2.791E06
1.181E05
2.007E05
2.679E05
3.100E05
3.247C05
3.208E05
3.087E05
1.752E01
1.494E01
1.184601
8.485E02
5.082E02
1.771E02
1.318E02
4.052E02
6.322E02
8.053E02
9.209E02
9.780E02
9.790E02
9.309E02
8.434E02
7.254E02
5.827E02
4.215E02
2.516E02
8.682E03
6.10lEr.3
1.877E02
2.950E02
3.834E02
4.470E02
4.778E02
4.744E02
4.457E02
4.037E02
3.533E02
2.9G5E02
2.111E02
1.214E02
3.667E03
3.124E03
8.393E03
1.321E02
1.807E02
2.209E02
2.380h02
2.286E02
2.059E02
1.869E02
1.741E02
1.534E02
1.118E02
5.550E03
6. 766E04
1.867E03
2.907E03
4.459E Cl
5.776E 01
6.532E 01
6.810E 01
6.757E Cl
6.444E 01
5.866E Cl
5.035E Cl
4.018E Cl
2.895E 01
1.725E Cl
5.650E CO
5.011E CO
1.389E 01
2.079E 01
2.623E 01
3.064E 01
3.354E 01
3.394E 01
3.154E 01
2.746E 01
2.331E 01
1.965t 01
1.548E 01
9.6:31E CO
2.603E CO
3.634E 00
7.410E CO
9.214E CO
1.109E 01
1.422E 01
1.733E 01
1.800E 01
1.546E 01
1.177E 01
9.719E CO
9.743E CO
9.382E CO
6.127E CO
5.762EC1
3.85CE CO
4.583E CO
2.920E CO
2.737E CO
6.042E CO
1.038E 01
1.132E 01
7.582t CO
2.903E CO
2.135E CO
1.673E01
6.987E01
6.313E01
1.622E02
3.800E01
3.069E01
4.558E02
1.132E01
1.585E01
1.656E01
8.186E02
1.414E01
3.257E01
1.951E01
2.220E01
4.889E01
2.232EC1
3.718E01
6.273E01
1.667E01
5.65CE01
7.195E01
3.034E02
7.775E01
7.485E01
1.767E01
9.863E01
7.017E01
4.444E01
1.168E 00
5.696E01
7.586EOL
1.302E 00
3.463EOL
1.102E 00
1.365E 00
2.836E02
l^bbE 00
1.336E 00
3.834EC1
1.796E 00
1.193E 00
8.870E01
2.097E 00
9.131E01
1.476E 00
2.327E 00
4.695EC1
2.143E CO
2.448E 00
128
r i M
DISPLACEMENT
VELOCITY
ACCELERATION
FOKCE
SEC
INCHES
INCH/SEC
INCH/SEC/SEC
LB
5.000E02
5.050E02
5.10CE02
5.1bOE02
5.200E02
5.250E02
5.300E02
5.350E02
5.400E02
5.450E02
5.500E02
5.550E02
5.600E02
5.6i>OE02
5.700E02
5.750E02
5.800E02
5.850E02
5.900E02
5.950E02
6.000E02
6.050E02
6.1COE02
2.903E05
2.580E05
2.060E05
1.411E05
7.949E06
3.239E06
5.383E07
4.740E06
9.778E06
1.423E05
1.616E05
1.530E05
1.369f^05
1.351E05
1.448E05
1.38i>E05
9.592E06
3.599E06
6.507E07
3.250E06
7.553E06
6.247F06
1.772E06
/4.745EU3
8.403E03
1.215E02
1.321E02
1.099E02
8.077E03
7.560E03
9.421E03
1.021E02
6.872EC3
7.131E04
3.380EG3
2.240E03
1.433E03
1.420E03
4.754E03
1.161E02
1.037E02
2.241E04
9.246E03
5. 165E03
1. LiOE02
1.632E02
LOOK FOR MORE DATA
ALL INPUT DATA HAVE BEEN PROCESSED
5.619E
8.370E
5.564E
1.552E
6.360E
4.128E
2.069E
4.074E
2.105E
1.078E
1.202E
3.132E
6.705h
5.625E
6.678E
1.601E
8.142E
1.298E
2.467E
8.342E
2.454E
3.235E
2.341E
CC
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
01
01
CO
CO
00
CO
01
CO
01
01
CO
01
01
01
1.682EC1
2.874E 00
2.408E 00
1.042E 00
3.653E 00
2.117E CC
2.210E oc
4.456E 00
1.523E CO
3.774E CC
5.242E ou
3.692E01
5.913E 00
5.926E oc
1.731E ou
9.014E CO
6.2836 00
5.834E CO
1.408E 01
5.362E 00
1.599E 01
2.476t 01
6.944E oc
n
u
D
C
i
:
^
2.
A"
REFERENCES
REISSNER, E. : Stationare, axialsymmetrische durch
eine schuttelnde Masse erregte Schwingungen eines
homogenen elastischen Halbraumes. IngenieurArchiv,
vol. 1. pp. 381  396, Dec. 1936.
SUNG, T. Y,: Vibrations in Semiinfinite Solids Due
to periodic Loading. Symp. Dyn. Testing Soils, ASTM
Spec. Tech. Publ. No. 156, pp. 3568, 1953.
BYCROFT, G. N,: Forced Vibrations of a Rigid Circular Plate on a SemiInfinite Elastic Space or an
Elastic Stratum. Phil. Trans. Roy,,., Ser. A, vol.
248, pp. 327368, 1956.
HSIEH, T, K.: Foundation Vibrations. Proc. Inst.
Civil Engrs., vol. 22, pp. 211226, 1962.
w.
RICHART, F. E,, JR.: Foundation Vibrations. Jour.
Soil Mech. Found. Div. ASCE, Proc. ASCE, vol. 86,
pp. 134, Aug., I960.
nu
FRY, Z 0 B.: Development and Evaluation of Soil Bearing Capacity, Foundations of Structures. U,, S. Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, VIcksburg, Miss., Technical Report No. 3632,
Report 1, July, 1963.
ntad
nw
CHAE, Y. S.: Dynamic Pressure Distribution at the
Base of a Rigid Footing Subjected to Vibratory Loads.
U, S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,
Corps of Engineers,. Vicksburg, Miss., Contract Report
No. 388, May, 1964.
"
'
9.
DRNEVICH, V. P., HALL, J. R., JR., RICHART, F.E., JR.:
Report on Impact Tests to be prepared at the University
of Michigan under contract No. DA22079ENG340 with
the U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,
Vicksburg, Miss.
Expected completion date June 1965.
RAYLEIGH, LORD: On Waves Propagated along the surface
of an Elastic Solid, Proc,, London Math. Soc., vol. 17,
pp, 3H* London 1885
129
TA7W3.