Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 29

Afghanistan

Public Policy Research Organization


Patterns of State-Civil Society Interactions in


India: Key Features

July 2015

Project Report

Acknowledgements


This study was commissioned by Afghanistan Public Policy Research Organization (APPRO) as part of a
series of research papers for the Citizens First: Improving human security in Afghanistan and Pakistan
project, funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs through Oxfam Novib.


About the Authors

This paper was authored by Anuja Upadhyay, an independent researcher based in New Delhi, India and
expanded and edited by Saeed Parto, Director of Research at APPRO.

Anuja Upadhyay and APPRO would like to thank all the individuals from civil society organizations and
governmental bodies who agreed to be interviewed for this research and who generously shared
information and insights about the interface between civil society organizations and the Government of
India. Particular thanks go to Prachin Ghodjaker, Professor Mondira Dutta, and Professor Amita Singh
from Jawaharlal Nehru University.


About APPRO

Afghanistan Public Policy Research Organization (APPRO) is an independent social research organization
with a mandate to promote social and policy learning to benefit development and reconstruction efforts
in Afghanistan and other less developed countries through conducting social scientific research,
monitoring and evaluation, and training and mentoring. APPRO is registered with the Ministry of
Economy in Afghanistan as a non-profit non-government organization and headquartered in Kabul,
Afghanistan with satellite offices in Mazar-e Sharif (north), Herat (west), Kandahar (south), and Jalalabad
(east). APPRO and its individual researchers have undertaken projects in Central Asia, Pakistan, India,
Africa, China, and Turkey.

For more information, see: www.appro.org.af
Contact: mail@appro.org.af

Photo: Indian Express (April 3, 2013)

APPRO takes full responsibility for all omissions and errors.


2015. Afghanistan Public Policy Research Organization. Some rights reserved. This publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted for non-commercial purposes only and with
written credit to APPRO, Oxfam Novib, and the author(s). Where this publication is reproduced, stored
or transmitted electronically, a link to APPROs website at www.appro.org.af should be provided. Any
other use of this publication requires prior written permission, which may be obtained by writing to:
mail@appro.org.af

www.appro.org.af

Acronyms
CSO
EVAW
FCRA
MDG
NAC
NBA
NGO
MNRGEA
PWDVA
RTI
SRA
VAW




www.appro.org.af

Civil Society Organization


Elimination of Violence Against Women
Foreign Contribution Regulation Act
Millennium Development Goals
National Advisory Council
Narmada Bachao Andolan
Non-Government Organization
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Guarantee Employment Act
Protection from Domestic Violence Act
Right to Information Act
Societies Regulation Act
Violence Against Women


Table of Contents
Acronyms ............................................................................................................................... 2
Background ............................................................................................................................ 4
Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 8
Objectives and Methodology .................................................................................................. 8
CSOs in India........................................................................................................................... 9
CSOs and Governance in India .............................................................................................. 13
Challenges and Risks For CSOs .............................................................................................. 15
Indian CSOs and Fighting Corruption .............................................................................................. 15
Indian CSOs and Violence Against Women ..................................................................................... 18
Current Perceptions and Status of CSOs................................................................................ 20
Perceptions of CSOs in Governance ................................................................................................ 20
Challenges for CSOs........................................................................................................................ 21
CSO-Government Interface ............................................................................................................ 21
Good Practices in Combating Violence Against Women and Corruption ......................................... 22
Conclusion............................................................................................................................ 23
Implications for Afghanistan................................................................................................. 24
Recommendations................................................................................................................ 25
Recommendations for Fighting Corruption..................................................................................... 25
Recommendations for Fighting Violence Against Women............................................................... 26
Annex 1: Key Informant Interview Guiding Questions........................................................... 27
Annex 2: List of interviewees ................................................................................................ 28








www.appro.org.af

Background
The Citizens First: Improving Human Security project was designed to examine the possibilities for
intensified and constructive engagement between civil society organizations and governments in
effecting good, or better, governance in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The project is being implemented in
close collaboration with local communities and civil and governmental structures at the provincial and
national levels in both countries. The sites of this project in Afghanistan are three districts from each of
the three provinces of Herat, Nangarhar, and Takhar, selected for their geographical and ethnic (Hazara,
Pashtun, Tajik, and Uzbek) diversity and based on the available resources for this project. The selection
of the districts within each province included urban and rural communities to reflect the widest possible
economic diversity within each province. Table 1 shows the provinces and districts.

Table 1: Site selections for Afghanistan

Province
Herat West
Nangarhar East
Takhar North

District
Herat City, Guzara, Enjil
Jalalabad City, Behsud, Surkh Rud
Taloqan City, Baharak, Fakhar


A key concern for many stakeholders in Afghanistan is that human security is likely to deteriorate in the
post-2014 period due to the decrease in development aid funding and the economic contraction that is
likely to follow. In addition, the impact of this economic downturn will be unevenly distributed
throughout the country. For example, since Afghanistan is likely to remain a net importer of many goods
for the foreseeable future, Herat and Nangarhar will be less adversely affected economically than
Takhar since both Nangarhar and Herat will continue to receive a steady and reliable flow of revenue
from their customs operations, approximately 220 million USD per year for Herat and 165 million USD
per year for Nangarhar. This compares to 350,000 USD per year for Takhars minimal customs
operations.1 Provinces such as Takhar are likely to be affected much more adversely with the general
reduction in development aid in the post-2014 period.

Given this background, the Citizens First projects overriding goal is to establish how this economic
outlook will affect the Afghan population in each of the three province and what roles can be played by
civil society organizations in ensuring that responding to the threats to human security remain a top
priority for the Government of Afghanistan and its international donors. There is a need to ensure that
the provincial government in each province is willing and able to respond to the needs of their
communities. A key aim for the Citizens First project is to contribute to the creation of legitimate,
representative, and strong CSOs that can effectively and constructively engage governmental officials to
ensure that citizens needs are served. As such, this project will identity the structures through which
governance is exercised in Afghanistan, the effectiveness of these structures, and the entry points for
strengthening those structures that best serve citizens and initiating change or reform toward structures
that undermine attempts at good governance. The ultimate goal for Citizens First is to increase the
citizens trust in their government, governments sense of responsibility toward serving its citizens, and
mutual respect by the government toward the citizens and vice versa.


1

These figures were furnished by a key informant from the Customs Department of the Ministry of Finance, on
January 15, 2015.

www.appro.org.af



Citizens First is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs through Oxfam Novib Afghanistan,
partnering with Afghanistan Public Policy Research Organization (APPRO) and Peace, Training, and
Research Organization (PTRO) as the Afghan national counterparts.

Figure 1: CSO / Government Interface in Citizens First Project


An expected output of the Citizens First project is to devise a human security model based on the rule
of law, responsive government, and civic involvement in policy making resulting in good governance.
This model, developed and tested in Afghanistan, will be expanded and further developed to enable
www.appro.org.af

improved awareness by local governments in Afghanistan and Pakistan as a means to increase


government and citizens responsive capacities to resolve conflicts at different scales through peaceful
means. The model will also serve as a monitoring tool for evidence-based advocacy and mutual
accountability between governments and citizens. In Afghanistan, Citizens First has engaged CSOs at the
local / district, provincial, and national levels through training and mentoring on the policy process and
good governance while, at the same time, parallel training and mentoring programs have been carried
out at the Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock (MAIL), Ministry of Education (MoEd), and
Ministry of Economy (MoEc). Figure 1 describes the structure of Citizens First. Throughout 2015,
national and sub-national advocacy committees will be formed to commence activities in support of
food security and access to education in the three target provinces.

This paper is one of a series of papers to examine, and learn from, CSO-government interface in contexts
similar to Afghanistan. This paper focuses on the evolution of CSO-government interface in India. To
ensure currency and availability of data, the two topics selected for this paper are violence against
women and corruption. The analysis in the following sections is based on the available information from
secondary sources such as books, journal articles, and news media and primary data collected through a
series of interviews with key informants in India. The key informants were drawn from governmental
bodies, CSOs, and academics. The frame of analysis in this paper combines policy making, governance,
and institutions as intertwined and embedded processes. The policy process is depicted in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Elements of the Policy Process

Adapted from Ostrom (1999)


According to Figure 2, policies are products of the material and physical conditions, attributes of the
community, the mode or system of governance, the institutional context, and patterns of interaction
between the relevant actors and factors. Figure 2 also highlights the fact that all policy outputs cause

www.appro.org.af

and/or identify new problems. As such, a third key proposition in Figure 2 is that policy making is a never
ending, circular, process linking problems to policies in a repetitive feedback loop.

For the Citizens First project, the focus of all the activities is on the institutional context and the patterns
of interaction between the relevant actors and factors (Figure 2). The findings the case study of India
(this paper) and the case study of Turkey need to be examined for their implications for formal
governmental entities in Afghanistan and whether and how these entities interact among themselves
and with CSOs representing community issues and interests.2 The working definition adopted for
governance is the manner in which a community of interdependent actors organizes itself / is organized.
The working definition for institutions in this project is the tangible and intangible structures through
which governance is exercised.

See APPRO (2015), State-Civil Society Interactions in Turkey: Retrospect and Prospects, available from:
http://appro.org.af/state-civil-society-interactions-in-turkey-retrospect-and-prospects/

www.appro.org.af

Introduction
Since the late 1960s civil society organizations (CSOs) have been active in governance, or governing, in
relatively more democratic systems of government in developed and less developed countries. The term
non-government organization (NGO) has been used interchangeably with civil society organization
(CSOs), grassroots organizations, lobby or interest groups, major groups, and social movements.3 CSOs
have emerged as capable and mostly independent actors adept at fostering change and affecting
political agendas. Simultaneously governance has evolved into a broader notion than government.
Governance is now broadly understood as encompassing the constitution, legislature, executive and
judiciary and all the relevant actors engaged in societal decision making at different levels, territorial
scales, and spheres. Governance now involves different types of interaction between government and
non-government, formal and informal institutions.4

By all accounts CSOs have been an inseparable component of governance in India for a number of
decades. Given this long history, the purpose for this paper is to establish how Afghanistan may benefit
Indias experience in collaborative modes of governance involving ongoing and active interaction
between government and civil society organizations. To this end, this paper documents the diverse roles
that CSOs have played and continue to play in governance in India, focusing on the two major issues of
corruption and sexual violence against women to highlight some of the key lessons learned and the
potential for their adoption and adaptation for the Afghan context.

CSOs in India emerged as community-driven entities carrying out voluntary work for developmental
programs and activities. Later, CSOs became actively involved in social movements to demand rights and
challenge social inequities as well as bring about changes in public policy. Today CSOs in India are seen,
and act, as the link between Indian civil society and the government in a number of key areas. This paper
examines the nature of the interface between CSOs and the government in dealing with key social
issues. Since corruption and sexual harassment have been headlining the news from India since late
2013, the paper focuses on the collaborative work between CSOs and the government on these two
issues, the challenges each face, and the critical and instrumental role of Indian CSOs in fighting
corruption and combating sexual violence. The characteristics of this interface have important
implications for collaboration between CSOs and governments on other issues such as food security and
government service provision in India and beyond.

Objectives and Methodology


The following objectives were set for this study:


3

Civil society is a term that became popularized at the end of the Cold War to describe what appeared to have
been missing in state-dominated societies, broad societal participation in and concern for governance, but not
necessarily government. Civil society is thought to be the necessary ingredient for democratic governance to
arise. NGOs are one part of civil society. See: http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/role-ngo
4
See Parto (2005a).
www.appro.org.af

Establish the role of civil society organization in government decision making/policy making in
India
Document the formal role allocated to CSOs by the Government of India
Synthesize the key features of the mode of governance in India with a focus on the interface
between CSOs and government
Identify and document the mechanisms and legal provisions for dealing with corruption and
sexual violence against women through collaborative arrangements involving CSOs and the
government, and
Generate recommendations of best practices relevant to the Afghan context.


The paper is based on an analysis of primary and secondary data. Primary data were collected from key
informants drawn from Indian CSOs, government organizations, and donor agencies working on
womens rights issues, especially those combating sexual violence against women and those working on
anti-corruption. The key informants included academicians, lawyers, womens rights activists, and
government officials from the administrative, revenue, and law enforcement branches of government.
The data were gathered from February 25 to March 20, 2014. Access to officials was more limited than
expected due to the General Elections in late 2014. The secondary data sources included academic
research papers, books, technical reports, laws, newspaper articles, and websites of relevant
organizations.

CSOs in India
India has had a long history of civic engagement in providing public and social good, partly propelled
by its cultural ethos and values. The sudden growth of organized voluntary action by civic
organizations became manifest only after independence in 1947, however. Since independence
successive Indian governments have undertaken a number of initiatives to encourage voluntary work
by civil society organizations to assist with developmental programming. Today, some CSOs
cooperate with the national government to implement public policy while others serve as watchdogs
and monitors who can put pressure on government agencies to uphold the spirit of the state's laws
and implement policies in accordance with stated objectives. CSOs strive to raise the political
consciousness of various social groups, encouraging them to demand their rights and challenge social
inequities. Some CSOs serve as innovators, experimenting with new approaches to solving social
problems.5

Rajesh Tandon defines civil society as a collection of individual and collective initiatives for the common
public good.6 Civil society organizations are thus linked to public arenas where the promotion of
broadly defined public good is the purpose of the interactions between civic organizations and the
government. Public good could be education, health care, sanitation, prevention of pollution, protecting
natural resources, protection of human rights, maintaining peace and harmony, or simply the right for
expressing disagreement.

The broad definition of civil society has three key features. First, civil society is a free, open, and
accessible space for the expression of ideas, taking action, and initiating discussion, debate, and

5
6

Pranab Bardhan, Our Self-Righteous Civil Society, XLVI(29), Economic and Political Weekly, (July 16, 2011).
Tandon, R.(2003).The Civil Society- Governance Interface: An Indian Perspective. In, R. Tandon and R. Mohanty(
Eds.), Does Civil Society Matter? Pp.59-76

www.appro.org.af

contestation. Second, civil society nurtures movements for advancing various causes. In recent decades
causes such as human rights, womens rights, childrens rights, tribal rights, peace, and environmental
protection have all advanced through a variety of social movements. Protest movements against policies
and actions of powerful national and international institutions on building dams, factories, mines, and
the related dislocations of the affected communities are examples of such movements. In all of these
examples, civil society actions as movements enable organized efforts at articulating the voices of those
who are typically not heard by formal authorities. Third, civil society includes sub-national, community-
based structures such as village councils, neighborhood associations, local sports and cultural groups,
forest protection groups, voluntary development organizations, advocacy groups, and campaign
organizations.

The formal role and contributions of CSOs in governance in India only came into widespread recognition
in 1991, when liberalization policies and economic reforms began to be introduced in India. This turn
toward liberalization coincided with a broader, global move from government to governance.7 In India
the simultaneous liberalization of the domestic market and the international trade arrangements
signified a shift from protective government welfare and trade policies to open and less strictly
regulated domestic and international market and trade regimes. As with most other countries
undergoing a shift from government to governance, in India this shift resulted in an era of greater public
participation in governing through decentralization of power to village councils or Gram Sabhas.8 In
addition, a mandatory quota for women of half of the seats in government bodies was introduced as a
means to institutionalize gender equality in government.

In the period since 1991, India's urban middle classes have increasingly looked to CSOs to express their
expectations and aspirations for governance. The educated middle class citizens were further
empowered by a series of significant laws such as the Right to Information Act (2005), Public Disclosure
Law (2005), and Community Participation Law (2005). The Right to Information Act obligates
governmental bodies to provide timely response to citizens requests for government information. The
Act has established the RTI Portal Gateway for the citizens to search for and access government
information while various public authorities regularly publish information and disclosures on the
internet with open access.9

The Community Participation Law (also known as Model Nagara Raj Bill) was issued by the Ministry of
Urban Development to obligate all states to undertake reform programs for more inclusive engagement
with CSOs in matters of governance with a focus on the implementation of the Jawaharlal Nehru

Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and risks of failure: the case of economic development. International
Social Science Journal (50:155).
8
Gram Sabhas are village councils in India which include all the adult citizens of the village. It is empowered to
support or topple down the Gram Panchayat (local self-governance institution). The Sabha can contribute to a
number of decisions taken by the Panchayat and can modify weak decisions whenever they want. The Panchayat
can be established for a village having a population of 1,000-25,000. The villages having smaller populations are
grouped under Gram Sabhas. The member count usually ranges from 7 to 17 depending on the strength of the
village population. These form various Committees on, for example, Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Public
Works, Social Welfare and Health and sanitation in the village.
9
For more information, see: http://rti.gov.in/rti-act.pdf and
http://ccs.in/sites/default/files/files/CCS_6_Public%20Disclosure%20Law.pdf
www.appro.org.af

10

National Urban renewal Mission. The main objective of the Law is to institutionalize citizen participation
at the lowest level of governance in urban areas.10

Moreover, the spate of disasters, both man- made and natural, reinforced the need for partnerships
between CSOs and government in disaster management processes. For example, CSOs played an active
role in providing humanitarian assistance during in period following the Bhopal gas tragedy in 1984,
Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004, and the Maharashtra floods in 2005 to name a few.11 After the Bhopal
tragedy 4 different NGOs were immediately engaged in disaster management work. The first disaster
reports were published by activist organizations such as Eklavya and the Delhi Science Forum. Around
ten local organizations have been engaged in disaster management since Bhopal on a longer term basis.
Some of the most active NGOs are Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila-Stationery Karmachari Sangh, Bhopal Gas
Peedit Mahila Udyog Sangathan, Sambhavana Trust, and International Campaign for Justice in Bhopal.

The December 2004 tsunami resulted in the Disaster Management Act of 2005 after a nationwide
consultative process between the government and over 600 CSOs for coordinated action on disaster
management. This Act has provided the legislative framework and legitimacy to the state executive
management committees and district authorities to provide advice, assist, and coordinate the activities
of NGOs engaged in disaster management. The District Authorities are mandated to encourage the
involvement of NGOs and voluntary social welfare institutions working at grass root level in the districts
for disaster management.12

After the July 2005 floods in Mumbai the municipal authorities and CSOs formed a partnership to bring
about inclusive and effective governance to prevent the repeat of such disasters. The NGO Council, a
pan-city citizens' organization, comprised 69 CSOs working together for better governance in Mumbai.
The NGO Council adopted a partnership model with the municipal authority of Mumbai and with other
NGOs and government bodies. The role of CSOs in the development process was to serve as a non-
political link between the people and governmental bodies and bring professional expertise to assist in
the government's efforts. The issues addressed in various meetings between the municipality and the
NGO Council included corruption, accountability, better governance, service delivery especially with
respect to cleanliness, solid waste management, disaster management, beautification of urban spaces,
traffic, management of street vendors, and the management of pedestrian spaces. Fighting corruption
was the highest priority for the NGO Council.13


10

For more details, see:


http://www.civicspace.in/sites/default/files/attachments/Community%20participation%20laws%20-
%20analysis%20by%20Shyam%20Singh%20.pdf.
11
The Bhopal Gas Tragedy was a gas leak incidence in India considered the worlds largest industrial disaster which
occurred on the night of 2-3 December 1984 in the city of Bhopal in Madhya Pradesh at the Union carbide India
Limited pesticide plant. For further details see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disaster. The Maharashtra
floods of 2005 refers to the flooding of many parts of the Indian state of Maharashtra including large areas of
the metropolis Mumbai in which at least 5,000 people died. Available from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maharashtra_floods_of_2005.
12
For more information about this process see: http://nidm.gov.in/idmc/IDMC_Abstract/D6-
Role%20of%20NGOs.pdf
13
Singh, B. (2013) ORF Issue Brief, Governance, citizens and new civil society in contemporary urban India: Lessons
from Mumbai. Available from:
http://orfonline.org/cms/export/orfonline/modules/issuebrief/attachments/Issuebrief54_1371713087707.pdf.[
Last accessed on 2014 Jan 25]
www.appro.org.af

11

At the same time, international funding agencies had been emphasizing the need for the role of CSOs in
governance of international development globally. The current emphasis on the role of CSOs in
achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015 has formalized the inclusion of CSOs in all
matters of global governance.

The role of CSOs in governance has evolved over the years in India. Currently, CSOs are engaged in the
political process for the formulation of Five Year Plans by the Planning Commission.14 Although some
budget had been allocated to CSOs (then known as NGOS) in the 1980s, the actual recognition of CSOs
work and contributions began in 1998 after the eighth Five Year Plan (1992- 1997). Similarly, during the
eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-2012) the Government engaged CSOs in consultations on the budget,
seeking their inputs, suggestions, and experiences.

Traditionally CSOs in India have acted as voices of the dominated, and often disempowered, segments in
society to the dominant elements. Some view the role of civil society in good governance in India in the
context of electoral processes and elections.15 According to this view, CSOs should act as a vigilant
watchdog and see that corruption does not seep in electoral processes. The Indian elections are funded
mainly by private corporations and a candidates entrance into politics is mainly facilitated by their
ability to secure funds for their candidacy. Given the high corruptive potential of these arrangements,
the role of CSOs is to minimize, if not eliminate, corruption. The role of CSOs is thus to educate all
concerned about the need for the legislative, judiciary, and legislature branches of the government to be
fairly representative since in a democracy those who govern should be drawn from all sections of the
society.

Another view of CSOs in good governance outlines three main contributions of CSOs in national
development in the context of economic liberalization. These are:

1. Innovation: CSOs have been experimenting with new ways of promoting more sustainable,
people-centered development and have been able to develop methods, models, and equipment
widely adopted by the state and national governments as well as internationally.
2. Empowerment: CSOs have been involved in the empowerment of socio-economically
marginalized and exploited sections of society.
3. Research and Advocacy: CSOs have undertaken significant public education and policy advocacy
initiatives through their own research on women, tribes, Dalits (untouchables), environment,
education, and human rights.16

According to this view there are linkages between civil society and government in a number of key
areas as follows.

Local self-governance: Civil society plays a meaningful role in ensuring self governance of public
institutions that use public resources. Civil Society can ensure that community-based organizations,

14

The Planning Commission of the Government of India formulates Indias Five Year Plans. For more information
see: http://planningcommission.nic.in/
15
Oommen, T.K. (2003). Civil Society and the Role of Good Governance. In Tandon, R. and R. Mohanty (Eds.), Does
Civil Society Matter? Pp.125-44
16
Goswami, D. and R. Tandon (2013). Civil Society in Changing India: Emerging Roles, Relationships and Strategies

www.appro.org.af

12

cooperatives, trade unions, sports associations, and the like establish standards and norms of self-
governance consistent with democratic principles and practices in urban and rural areas.

Defining public good: Civil society contributes to good governance through articulating definitions for
and prioritization of public goods. It plays a role in speaking for those whose voices are likely to
remain unheard. In India, civil society organizations have created channels through which the needs
and concerns of Dalits, tribes, religious minorities, women, and children are expressed to formal
decision and policy making bodies.17

Influencing public negotiations: The collective role of CSOs is to shape public opinion for the provision
and protection of public goods through community organization. Public goods may include health
services, education, womens rights, fighting corruption, safe drinking water, adequate sanitation,
transport, and employment. CSOs participate in public negotiations in various ways such as
presenting perspectives and experiences on their own work in a micro setting, monitoring impact of
previous and related policies, and raising questions about the larger public good and how it is
protected or undermined through government planning and budgeting. As such, CSOs interact with
the legislature, ministries, and other governmental entities. Even though CSOs themselves may not
be directly responsible for the formation of policy, they play a role in influencing it.

Ensuring state accountability: CSOs interact with different arms of the state to ensure that they
function with accountability and in accordance to the relevant laws and the constitution. A related of
function of CSOs is to hold the law and order machinery accountable. Other areas where
accountability is needed the mechanisms through which the large funds provided by international
development agencies are allocated and spent. Many CSOs in India also play roles in bringing
accountability to the functioning of political parties and electoral processes.

Accountability of the private sector: Since private sector organizations and associations represent the
interests of their members and participate in the public arena, CSOs often assume the responsibility
of ensuring accountability to the public by private sector interests. Consumer protection movements
and organizations protect the rights of the consumer and counteract to initiatives deemed as
damaging to or undermining consumers.18

CSOs and Governance in India


The role of CSOs in governance in India has been evolving and changing with time. CSOs in
contemporary India organize in innovative ways to exert influence on government policy making and
actions. They make effective and elaborate use of the media to bring attention to issues of concern

17

Dalit a designation for a group of people traditionally regarded as untouchable. The word Dalit comes from the
Sanskrit root dal and means broken, ground-down, downtrodden, or oppressed. Those previously known as
Untouchables, Depressed Classes, and Harijans are today increasingly adopting the term Dalit as a name for
themselves. Dalit refers to ones caste rather than class and applies to members of low castes which have born
the stigma of untouchability because of the extreme impurity and pollution connected with their traditional
occupations. As such, Dalits are outcastes, falling outside the traditional four-fold caste system consisting of the
hereditary Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, and Shudra classes. For further detail see:
http://www.ncdhr.org.in/dalits-untouchability/
18
Goswami, D. and R. Tandon (2013)
www.appro.org.af

13

for their constituents and use formal and informal mechanisms within the state machinery to
disseminate their demands based on their interactions with communities. At a formal level a number
of specific roles have been delineated for CSOs as follows.19

CSOs as watchdogs: One of the most significant roles of CSOs in contemporary India is that of acting as
watchdogs especially against human rights violations and governing deficiencies. In many ways, the
Right to Information Act (RTI) institutionalizes the role of CSOs acting as watchdogs.20 Under RTI CSOs
have access to information on the basis on which they can press for accountability and transparency of
the government. CSOs monitor legislative processes and evaluate the impact of public policy decisions.
CSOs are also in a position to pressurize the government to formulate policies to benefit the more
vulnerable sections of society. Of late, CSOs have been participating in social audits and budget
monitoring and analysis.

CSOs as service providers: CSOs provide delivery of services to areas and communities underserved by
the government due to access or other issues. For example, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural
Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) of 2005, Forest Rights Act, and the Right to Food Act ensure at a
formal level that basic community needs such as employment, food and food security, and a right to
using forest resources are addressed. The bulk of program implementation activities at the grassroots
level have been provided by local, community-based CSOs, however.

CSOs as advocates: Many CSOs are engaged in Planning Commissions formulation processes of Five
Year Plans. In 2012 a review of the eleventh Five Year Plan was conducted by a consortium of voluntary
organizations after a series of consultations at state and thematic levels. Various subgroups were
created by the Planning Commission to help draft the next Fiver Year Plan. Since 2009 selected CSOs
have been invited by the Finance Ministry for a pre-budget annual consultation while many consultative
committees have been formed by various ministries to seek structured input from the voluntary sector.

CSOs as mobilizers and campaigners: CSOs bring different groups and individuals from different strata in
society together with activists, academics, and celebrities. A recent example of such mobilization is the
Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) against an expansive program of dam building along the Narmada
River, displacing a large number of people. The large masses of people organized by a number of CSOs
managed to convince the Government of India and the World Bank (who funded the project) to stop the
program in 1992.21

CSOs as capacity builders: CSOs assist in the formation of additional community-based organizations and
provide capacity building for the more nascent organizations.

CSOs as educators: CSOs educate citizens on their rights, entitlements, and responsibilities while keeping
the government informed of the needs and aspirations of the most vulnerable segments of society. The
Forest Rights Act is a good example of the educational role of CSOs in India. Based on the information
provided by CSOs, the Act gave the tribal population legal rights over the forestlands where they had
been living for generations but without legal ownership.

19

Available from:
http://orfonline.org/cms/export/orfonline/modules/issuebrief/attachments/Issuebrief54_1371713087707.pdf
20
For more details see: http://rti.gov.in/
21
For more details, see: http://nvdatabase.swarthmore.edu/content/narmada-bachao-andolan-nba-forces-end-
world-bank-funding-sardar-sarovar-dam-india-1985-1993
www.appro.org.af

14


Recognizing the crucial role played by CSOs, the Government of India has made several attempts to
regulate their activities. Two such attempts are the Societies Registration Act (SRA) and the Foreign
Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) in 2010. Both legislations call for formal registration of CSOs,
currently numbering around 40,000. Also, the government has been much stricter of late in registering
new CSOs/NGOs. Under FCRA a CSO license has to be renewed every five years. CSOs must be registered
under both SRA and FCRA.

Challenges and Risks For CSOs


Indian CSOs are faced with several challenges, particularly since the early 1990s. Due to the increase in
funding from foreign governments, international donors and corporations, questions have been raised
about the authenticity, accountability, transparency, intention, and credibility of CSOs involved in
spending large funds. There are worries that the large sums of funding being given to CSOs could have a
corruptive effect on CSOs more concerned with raising large funds than serving civil society. In India, as
elsewhere, many NGOs are fronts for entrepreneurial businesses profiting from development activities.
Also, many CSOs lack organizational capacity to manage funds appropriately.
CSOs are also facing growing pressure from different levels of government, the public, and other
stakeholders to have transparent systems for keeping track of their funding sources, expenditures,
and effectiveness of their activities. Stakeholders are also asking CSOs to provide proof of the
measurable impacts created by their work. Though many CSOs have remained faithful to their initial
mandates serving their communities, many others have become subservient to the needs of their
actual and potential donors. There is suspicion in many communities, and among many government
officials, about the intention of CSOs, the funds they receive, and the ends to which these funds are
put. At the same time, CSOs are vulnerable to intimidation, especially if they receive foreign funding
and/or are engaged in advocacy including challenging government authority.

Since 2007 India's average per capita income rose sufficiently to qualify India as a lower middle-
income country.22 With this change of status, the total amount of development aid from international
sources to India is likely to continue to decrease compared to before. As a result, there has been
mounting pressure on CSOs dependent on international donor funds to find other means of
sustaining themselves. The likely outcome of the change in development funding arrangements
between India and donor countries is closure of many foreign fund-dependent Indian CSOs.

Despite these challenges and issues, there are a number of CSOs in India that have demonstrated
vision, commitment, innovativeness, and capacity to address major social concerns. The next two
sections provide two illustrative examples of the role of CSOs in addressing major issues of concern
to their constituents.

Indian CSOs and Fighting Corruption


CSOs and the Government of India collaborated in devising the Right to Information Act (RTI), the first
instance of participatory law making in India. The formation and formalization of RTI took more than 20

22

Available from: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Worlds-poor-move-with-India-into-middle-income-


bracket/articleshow/7165089.cms.[Last accessed on 2014 Feb 10]

www.appro.org.af

15

years and a long struggle by CSOs rooted in the Majdoor Kisan Sakthi Sangathan (MKSS) social
movement.23 The policy making process started in 1995, generating the first draft of the RTI policy in
1996, compiled by MKSS and the National Campaign for People's Right to Information (NCPRI).24 The
campaign for RTI started in the state of Rajasthan as a product of the popular demand for a minimum
wage for workers employed by the government. The campaign attempted to grapple with the root
causes of and reasons for the non-payment of wages by the government and demanded official
information recorded in government files in rural areas. The need to access government records on
wages was formalized, catalyzing a general demand by the people for the "right to know".

As part of its campaign, MKSS used a variety of tactics to make its demands known to the government.
These included sit-ins, rallies, lobbying the government, and organizing cultural events such music
festivals and street theater to gather support and disseminate its message. A National Advisory Council
(NAC) was setup in 2004 as an interface between civil society and the Government of India.25 NCPRI then
submitted its recommendations for the RTI draft bill to NAC in 2004, which endorsed most of them and
submitted the bill to the parliament. The Indian Parliament passed the bill in May 2005.

Since the enactment of RTI there has been considerable improvement in governance, dissemination of
information by the government, and involvement of civil society in the policy making processes and
actions by the government. The Act has created a freer environment for the interface between the
government and civil society and its organizations. The Act applies to all constitutional authorities
including the executive, legislature, and judiciary and other entities established or constituted by an act
of parliament or as a result of state legislature.26 As such, the Act contributes to efforts to enforce
effective implementation of other laws and policies.

Case studies and media reports show that RTI is being used to redress individual grievances, access
entitlements such as ration cards and pensions, investigate government policies and decisions, and
expose corruption and misuse of government resources. Much of the information regarding corruption
in the allocation of tenders and contracts for the 2010 Commonwealth Games was unearthed using RTI.
In 2010, a series of RTI applications filed by the Housing and Land Rights Network, a Delhi-based NGO,
revealed that the Delhi government had diverted funds of over USD7 billion from its social welfare
programs meant for infrastructure benefiting underprivileged castes and tribes to development under
the Commonwealth Games.27

Another remarkable development is the Lokpal and Lokayukta Act in 2013 to fight corruption. The long
and arduous struggle for this Act included several rounds of rejections over the decades. The origins of
the movement date back to 1963 and a suggestion made by the Prime Minister of the time, Moraji
Desai. To fight corruption, an institution resembling Scandinavias ombudsman was envisaged and
presented in the Parliament as a Lokpal Bill in the Lower House on May 9, 1968. This Act seeks to create
national and state level mechanisms for investigating allegations of corruption against certain public

23

Majdoor Kisan Sakthi Sangathan(MKSS) is an Indian social movement and grassroots organization best known for
its struggle and demand for RTI in India. For details see: http://www.mkssindia.org/about-us/
24
The National Campaign for People's Right to Information(NCPRI) is a campaign that was established in 1996 to
push for the creation of the RTI in India. For more information see: http://righttoinformation.info/about-us/
25
The task of the National Advisory Council (NAC) is to provide input in the formulation of policy by the
Government and to provide support to the Government in its legislative business. For more information, see:
http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/blogs/shrawan-pathak/1751-role-civil-society-evolution-rti-act-2005.html
26
Available from: http://rti.gov.in/rticorner/guideonrti.pdf.[Last accessed on 2014 Feb 09]
27
For more information see: http://governancenow.com/news/regular-story/games-propped-cost-dalits
www.appro.org.af

16

functionaries or matters connecting them with corruption.28 The Act is a direct outcome of the largest
mass mobilization in the recent history of CSOs in India. Starting in 2011, the India Against Corruption
(IAC) movement emerged to fight against endemic political corruption in the country through protests,
hunger strikes, and peaceful demonstrations led by the social activist Anna Hazare and supporters such
as Arvind Kejriwal.29 One of the initiators of this movement, Arvind Kejriwal, later formed a political
party and contested in the elections in 2013, becoming a Chief Minister for a short period of time.

CSOs have played a major role as watchdogs and capacity builders in the Mahatma Gandhi National
Rural Guarantee Employment Act (MNRGEA) of 2005. Under this Act the government is obliged to
involve CSOs and community based organizations (CBOs) in conducting social audits to review official
records and determine whether state-reported expenditures reflect the actual monies spent on
employment initiatives through transparent planning and monitoring of work and to prevent
corruption.30

Although MNRGEA is focused on employment, it is an effective means of providing access by
communities to governmental processes that affect employment, particularly in rural areas. The Act was
the Government of Indias response to signals it received from CSOs about the distress within rural
communities due to lack of work and income in the dry months of the year when there was no
agricultural work, a major cause of poverty in rural India.31 The Act guarantees the right to work and
ensures livelihood security in rural areas for 100 days of paid employment during the dry season for
every household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work. The scheme has been
vital for poor households without productive land or marketable skills by providing non-discriminatory
access to work and the timely payment of fair wages.

The National Consortium on NRGEA acts as a federated collective of civil society organizations to
document innovations and good practices in managing employment issues through organizing
workshops and consultations and bring together officials of the states and central government to discuss
how to address the many challenges of the MNRGEA.32

Another initiative that has revolutionized the government-citizen interface in India is e-governance. In
India it refers to the application of technology to transform the efficiency, effectiveness, transparency
and accountability of exchange of information and transactions between government agencies,
government and citizens and between government and business. E-governance also aims to empower
people through giving them access to information. The National e-governance Plan of 2006 makes all

28

The Lokpal is the anti-corruption ombudsman at the centre and the Lokayuktas are the anti-corruption
ombudsman organizations in the States.
29
See: http://www.annahazare.org/ [accessed January 2014] and: http://www.arvindkejriwal.in/ [accessed
January 2014].
30
Social audit as a term was used as far back as the 1950s. In a nutshell, it refers to the steps that are taken to
ensure that the work done by the Government is actually benefiting the people whom it is intended to benefit. It
is based on the principle that the local governance should be carried out, as much as possible, with the consent
and in complete understanding of the requirements of the people concerned. Thus, social audit is a process of
understanding, measuring, reporting, and most importantly improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the
local governance.
31
Available from:
http://tap.resultsfordevelopment.org/sites/tap.resultsfordevelopment.org/files/resources/Transparency-and-
Accountability-in-Governance-in-India.pdf.[Last accessed on 2014 Jan 25]
32
See: http://www.samprag.org/downloads/mnrega/mgnrega_lucknow_meet.pdf
www.appro.org.af

17

government services available to the public via electronic media. An extensive countrywide
infrastructure reaching the remotest of villages has evolved for large-scale digitization of records to
facilitate easy and reliable access and interaction between the government and citizens through the use
of Internet. The plan aims to make the government more accessible to citizens and businesses alike and
foster a more open environment.33 The Bhoomi Project, as part of e- governance, provides easy and
quick access to land records for farmers. Under this project 20 million land titles in Karnataka have been
digitized. The access is provided through designated information kiosks which also serve as protection
against harassment and extortion of the users. Assessments of the Bhoomi project have claimed that
the project has reduced corruption from 66% to less than 3%.34

Indian CSOs and Violence Against Women


The background for the many various laws and policies to protect women against violence in India
has been a series of mass movements over the years demanding change for better protection of
women. The first anti-rape movement where CSOs championing womens rights emerged at a
national level was in 1980, many years after the gang rape of a minor tribal girl, Mathura, by the
policemen on the premises of a police station in a village in the western state of Maharashtra in
1972.35 This event placed violence against women on the public agenda despite the fact that the
Supreme Court at the time acquitted the two accused policemen. The tragedy brought to fore several
crucial aspects of women's oppression in India including the role of class and caste in womens
oppression, and the issue of accountability to the public by public servants, the police, and the
judiciary in upholding the constitutional guarantees to protect citizens.

A letter by four law professors objecting to the Courts decision to acquit the two policemen and the
Chief Justice, started a long process that included a major role for womens rights activists and
organizations and resulted in significant legislative changes through the passing of the Indian
Evidence Act 1872, the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPc) 1973, and the Indian Penal Code 1860
introducing a category of custodial rape.36

A second movement emerged in 1994 when CSOs campaigned for a change in the law after the gang
rape of Bhanwari Devi, a grassroots worker employed as part of the Women's Development Project
(WDP) run by the Government of Rajasthan in North India. Bhanwari Devi had tried to stop a child
marriage in a village in Rajasthan in 1992. The men who gang raped Devi were acquitted by the court.
In response to this decision several womens groups and CSOs filed a petition with the Supreme
Court in 1994 under the collective platform of Vishaka against the State of Rajasthan and the Union

33

For more information see: http://india.gov.in/e-governance


For more information see: http://www.bhoomi.karnataka.gov.in/landrecordsonweb/
35
Agnihotri, I and Majumdar, V. Changing Terms of Political Discourse: Womens Movement 1970s to 1990s.
Economic and Political weekly; 1995: 30. Available from:
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4403023?uid=3738256&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21103560650153[Last
accessed on 2014 Mar 05]
36
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 contains a set of rules and regulations regarding admissibility of evidence in the
Indian Courts of Law. For details see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Evidence_Act. The Criminal Procedure
Act, 1973 is the main legislation on procedure for administration on substantive criminal law in India. For details
see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Criminal_Procedure,_1973. The Indian Penal Code,1860 is the main
comprehensive criminal code of India intended to cover all substantive aspect of criminal law. For details see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Penal_Code
34

www.appro.org.af

18

of India asking for a change in the outdated laws that did not provide adequate protection for
women. In 1997 the Supreme Court passed the landmark Vishaka Judgment and laid down Guidelines
on Sexual Harassment at the Workplace, to be followed by establishments dealing with complaints
about sexual harassment. Prior to Vishaka there were no formal guidelines in India for dealing with
incidents involving sexual harassment in the workplace or by an employer.

Also in the early 1990s the Lawyers Collective (LCWRI) began its campaign for a civil law on domestic
violence, resulting in the passing of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA) in
2005 by the Central Government. The Act aimed at creating a mechanism for safeguarding the
constitutional rights and privileges of women subjected to family violence and cruelty. The Act also
grants protection to women against family violence and marital relationships. A key outcome of the Act
has been police training on PWDVA in collaboration with the State Police in different states of India to
sensitize them about different forms of violence against women and stressing the issue of domestic
violence as a social problem rather than a private matter. LCWRI has been actively involved in follow up
and monitoring of implementing PWDVA through publishing a series of monitoring and evaluation
reports over the years. The 2013 report, for example, assesses the effectiveness of protection women
against violence within the framework of marriage and domestic relationships. Over a period of 9
months 9,526 out of the 22,255 Magistrate and Sessions Court Orders were received by LCWRI from 27
states and Union Territories.

In April 2013, almost 16 years after the issuance of the Vishaka Guidelines, India enacted its own law on
sexual harassment in the workplace, the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act and Rules. This
Act endorses many of the Vishaka Guidelines, and is a step toward codifying gender equality. Although
CSOs had been lobbying for many years since Vishaka for further legislative reform, specific laws only
came into force in 2012 after the anti-rape movement by led by CSOs and womens rights organizations
in response to a spate of cases of rape including the brutal gang rape and subsequent death of a 23
years old medical student, Nirbhaya, in December 2012.37

In January 2013 the Justice Verma Commission, a three member committee headed by Justice J.S.
Verma, former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, was formed to recommend amendments to the
Criminal Law of India as a means facilitate speedier trial processes and enhanced punishments for
criminals accused of committing sexual assault against women.38 More than 2,000 CSOs including
academics, lawyers, activists, voluntary organizations, students, and others were consulted prior to the
issuance of the recommendations by the Verma Commission.

The Criminal Law Amendment Act of 2013, which provides for the amendment of the Indian Penal Code
and the Indian Evidence Act and Code of Procedure was also passed by both Houses of Parliament in
December 2013. As a result of this Act there is now stronger punishment for stalking, attempts to acid
attack, acid attack, voyeurism, and sexual harassment, none of which were specifically mentioned in the
earlier versions of the Indian Penal Code. Some of the participating CSOs were also involved in the
follow up, which eventually led to the passing of the Criminal Law Amendment Act in 2013. The passing

37
38

Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Delhi_gang_rape. [Last accessed on 2014 Mar 05]


Justice Verma Committee was constituted to recommend amendments to the Criminal Law so as to provide for
quicker trial and enhanced punishment for criminals accused of committing sexual assault against women. The
Committee submitted its report on January 23, 2013. The Criminal Law of India (divided into three major acts
Indian Penal Code 1860, Indian Evidence Act 1872 and Code of Procedure 1973)For further details see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_criminal_law

www.appro.org.af

19

of all these major landmark judgments and legislative changes on fighting violence against women in
different spheres have been, by and large, the consequences of major incidents of sexual violence
against women, significant readiness of CSOs and womens rights organizations to organize and protest,
and the readiness of Indias legislators to respond to the strong messages and actions being issued
against violence against women by Indias civil society.

Current Perceptions and Status of CSOs


This section is based on the key findings from a series of interviews held with key informants during mid
to late 2014.

Perceptions of CSOs in Governance


Within the current institutional landscape of India CSOs are viewed as watchdogs to ensure
accountability from the Government, mobilizers for mass movements demanding public goods,
advocates for formulating new, or amending existing, policies and laws, capacity builders at the
grassroots level in rural and urban areas, and educators of the public through awareness raising
initiatives. CSOs are also recognized as service providers and as entities that provide spaces or create
platforms for the community to make its demands known to governmental decision makers. Some
government officials see CSOs as advocates and innovators for formulating policies while others view
CSOs as catalysts for social change, through providing leadership for popular movements demanding
change.

For some womens rights organizations the most significant role for CSOs is advocacy, awareness raising,
and mediating to combat sexual violence against women.39 This role involves advocacy programs
through information dissemination in the form of pamphlets and brochures, sensitizing law enforcement
agencies and the police on laws and the judiciary on how to deal sensitively with sexual violence cases:

CSOs intermediate and support victims and survivors of violence who do not want to go directly to the
police to lodge complaints for fear of stigmatization. When women go to the police, they do not receive
much response but if the complaint is lodged through a CSO it has much more weight.40


One Government official describes CSOs as innovative because they articulate ideas in the process of
drafting legislation such as PWDVA in 2005, the Vishaka Guidelines, and the Sexual Harassment at
Workplace Act. All these legislative measures came into place based on close collaboration between
CSOs and the Lawyers Collective to propose concrete steps to be taken by the government in fighting
violence against women.

Some are critical of the role of CSOs as merely program implementers. For example, a key informant
from a CSO working on anti-corruption and governance issues felt that CSOs should focus more on
critical advocacy to hold government authorities accountable and much less on service delivery.
According to this view, CSOs should take part in legislative work but this should not be done at the

39

Key informant from Shakti Vahini, a womens rights CSO specializing in prevention of trafficking women,
protection, and rehabilitation of trafficked women and girls which includes victims of rapes. Their primary role is
to raise awareness among the public including young girls who are likely to fall prey to traffickers.
40
Key informant from Shakti Vahini
www.appro.org.af

20

expense of the greater role as a watchdog. In addition, CSOs should be intermediaries between the most
vulnerable citizens and the government.

Challenges for CSOs


There are concerns that many organizations are being set up as CSOs by businesses and other special
interests to promote a positive image of the benefactors and as part of efforts to fulfill commitment to
Corporate Social Responsibility. CSOs may also be compelled to compromise their commitments and
integrity as a condition of securing donor funds. This is seen as an outcome of applying market principles
indiscriminately and to such issues as the provision and protection of public good, areas where markets
have an established reputation for failing.

Despite a significant element of voluntarism among CSOs in India, resource mobilization remains a key
challenge for CSOs, many of which fail to secure adequate funds to operate. Of the CSOs that receive
donor funds, a large part of the collective effort is directed at securing additional funds to continue
operation.

The views of CSOs from a government perspective are varied. One key informant stated that the
government is often suspicious of CSOs as having vested interests. To overcome this suspicion, the key
informant suggested that the demands and activities by CSOs would benefit from being based on
concrete problems and sound evidence. Another key informant reported that the Ministry of Women
and Child Development gives funds to CSOs to run shelters for victims of violence and to carry out
activities such as vocational training. CSOs in this case are seen as bodies that have tremendous
capacities and can give constructive criticism. But there are structural limitations to coordinated efforts
for programming for women:

Getting the financial resources is a constrain in the work by the Ministry of Women and Child
Development. The budget for fighting violence against women is to come from a cross section of
ministries. Law and order and police stations fall under the Ministry of Home Affairs. When victims of
violence go for medical aid the budget falls under Ministry of Health. Legal aid for women, shelters and
training centers fall under the Ministry of Law and Justice while domestic violence and dowry come under
the Ministry of Women and Child Development.41

Because corruption is endemic in India, there is a general wariness about appropriation of funds by CSOs
from a government perspective and by the government from a CSO perspective. One government
official admitted that corruption is culturally embedded and complex and, as such, very difficult to fight.
Legislation such as RTI may slow the process but it does not stop corruption completely.

CSO-Government Interface
Some CSOs are not content with working with the government though they recognize that collaboration
with the government is necessary. Working with government often entails appeasing government
officials with gratuities to overcome bureaucratic hurdles or to secure government funds. Gratuities are
involved when dealing with lower ranking government officials and during the process of tendering.
Also, taking funds directly from the government often means not being able to criticize the government.

41

Key informant from Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India

www.appro.org.af

21

These pressures force CSOs to become co-opted and partial, acting, in effect, as sub-contractors for the
government. For example,

India has a black economy [made up of] the businessmen, the political class (policy makers), and the
executive branch. The executive branch consists of the bureaucracy, the police and the judiciary. The
businessman has a white income but he wants to generate extra income and he uses the black economy
to generate that, for which he may have to bribe. The cut that is given to the politician and the executive
branch is generally only 10-15 percent. The businessman gets a return on investment of sometimes up to
700 percent. It is very lucrative. This situation makes corruption systematic and systemic, and hard to
fight.42

Good Practices in Combating Violence Against Women and Corruption


VAW and corruption are deeply rooted in Indian society. Different initiatives have been taken by
different actors to tackle VAW and corruption.

Some womens rights organizations have been focusing on university students and youth in their efforts
to mainstream gender. Initiatives include setting up systems for reporting cases of violence, leadership
skills training, and providing gender awareness programs for males and females. A key informant from a
womens rights organization stated that her organization has been working to address violence against
women by gender mainstreaming within government institutions and schools, colleges, and universities
through working with the youth:

We have a program with university students in Sonepat and Bareilly in the states of Haryana and Uttar
Pradesh. This collaborative program involves the university and the community where boys and girls
[have roles as] equal partners. Adolescent girls and boys form groups with students from the oldest
women-only university and boys in Sonepat. These boys and girls are the core group leading the project in
the two areas. The participants are taught to reflect on the process of gender discrimination as it happens
in their homes and around them. They are made to think how they themselves are perpetuating it and
how to address it themselves.43


At the formal level, CSOs are active in advocacy for changes in existing laws on ending violence against
women. As a result of advocacy efforts by CSOs, crimes such as rape and honour killing have clear
definitions, making it easier for the formal justice system to bring perpetrators of crimes against women
to justice. Also, disseminating advocacy materials on VAW in local languages, or using local imagery to
tackle VAW, plays a major role in raising / changing traditional community awareness. At the same time,
literacy, engaging tribal leaders, local councils, religious leaders, the police, and judiciary through
training and education have collectively played a key role in ending traditional practices harmful to
women.

A key informant with experience of working in Afghanistan and some Central Asian countries stated,

to deal with sexual violence against women the only way is to rope in the tribal leaders, local councils,
religious leaders, and the youth (especially men), and change their mindset gradually. One cannot impose


42
43

Key informant from a CSO


Key informant from PRIA, an organization working on governance and womens rights issues

www.appro.org.af

22

democratic norms in [conservative communities] right now and expect them to change overnight. It is
basically a tribal society and ruled by customary Islamic laws. Change will take time.44


In fighting corruption, social auditing is increasingly being used by CSOs to take government to account
for its expenditures and possible financial abuses. In social auditing trained volunteer auditors are
tasked by local organizations to audit and document administrative procedures and forms and financial
records of local development projects for irregularities and inconsistencies. In India, RTI is a very
effective legal instrument for facilitating social audits and fighting corruption. However, social audit does
not really work if it does not benefit from strong community support. Community-based, grassroots
movements are critical to bringing about change as laws and legislative reform do not, by themselves,
effect lasting change.45

E-governance also offers numerous opportunities for fighting corruption. A fully transparent means of
communication and information sharing between the government and the public is likely to provide
easy access to information including rules and procedures for access to government services and names
and locations of public officials responsible for different tasks, reducing administrative ambiquity and
therefore corruption while promoting better governance. According to one key informant:

E-governance is an excellent tool to deal with corruption and promote good governance as there is no
manual intervention or manipulation involved in the interaction between citizens and the government
officials. When [the number of steps in] interface [between citizens and government] are reduced, the
need for speed money or bribes is also drastically reduced.46

Conclusion
In India, changes in governance and the legal framework for addressing VAW and corruption have been
products of two key but related processes. First, India has a long, established, and uninterrupted
tradition of civic involvement in matters involving the provision of public good. Second, as the largest
democracy in the world, Indias various governments have had to be responsive to strong community
sentiments being expressed through CSOs, whose number in India is a staggering 40,000. Legislative
measures such as the Lokpal, Lokayukta, and RTI Acts have been important instruments for CSOs in
ensuring accountability and information sharing by government officials.

India has a rich, uninterrupted history of cooperation between CSOs and government. In part this history
is a product of context specific community attributes and a relatively open mode of governance,
nurtured during a relatively long period of peace in the country since the late 1940s. In practical terms
governance in India is now understood by many as encompassing the Constitution, legislature, executive
and judiciary and all the relevant actors engaged in societal decision making at different levels, territorial
scales, and in different spheres. Governance in India entails various types of interaction between
government and non-government, formal and informal institutions.


44

Key informant from a CSO.


As an aside, PRIA introduced the concept of social audits to Afghan Aid in Afghanistan in 2011, encouraging them
to involve the community in audits of the local governance arrangements and workings of Community
Development Councils as a means to develop the capacities of the local communities and to hold the local
governance actors accountable to the communities.
46
Key informant from a CSO.
45

www.appro.org.af

23

CSOs in India are widely accepted as entities with the right to function in a free, open, and accessible
space for the expression of ideas, taking action, and initiating discussion, debate, and contestation. CSOs
are active at all levels of governance ranging from community-level neighborhood associations to
cultural groups, forest protection groups, and rights campaign organizations. Increasingly CSOs have
become involved in advocacy for various causes such as human rights, womens rights, childrens rights,
tribal rights, peace, and environmental protection.

Some of these initiatives have resulted in the emergence and legitimization of protest movements
against policies and actions of powerful national and international entities on such issues as building
dams, factories, mines, and the dislocations caused by these projects in host communities. Through
these initiatives and activities CSOs have become catalysts for the emergence of organized efforts to
articulate the voices of most vulnerable and the least advantaged in India.

Arguably, the passing of significant laws such as the Right to Information Act (2005), Public Disclosure
Law (2005), and Community Participation Law (2005) is in part a product of the process of political
maturation and sophistication by Indian CSOs. The Right to Information Act, for example, obligates
governmental bodies to provide timely response to citizens requests for government information. The
RTI Portal Gateway allows citizens to search for and access government information while various public
authorities regularly publish information and disclosures on the internet with open access.

In economic development matters, Indian CSOs are active participants in the formulation of Five Year
Plans by the Planning Commission, with budgetary allowances made to facilitate and formalize this
participation. In the political process Indian CSOs often act as watchdogs to ensure that elections, for
example, are transparent and that corruption is minimized. This watchdog role limits the degree to
which private corporations and vested interests can influence the electoral process.

Over the decades Indian CSOs have become synonymous with social innovation, citizen empowerment,
policy-relevant research, and advocacy. At the same time, Indian CSOs are increasingly faced with
challenges similar to those faced by CSOs in other countries. A most fundamental challenge is funding
dependency. Whereas the origins of CSOs in India are community service, voluntarism, and rights
advocacy, the reliance by many international development aid organizations on local CSOs as service
delivery partners has resulted in a change of approach among CSOs, with many criticizing fund-receiving
CSOs as having become income generating enterprises for their members in the first instance and
community service providers as a secondary mandate.

Despite these challenges, there are numerous lessons that could be drawn from the experience and
history of CSOs in India for Afghan CSOs. The key recommendations based on the findings from the
analysis of primary and secondary data may be summarized as follows.

Implications for Afghanistan


The role of civil society organizations in development aid programme implementation in Afghanistan
came to the fore after 2001 though a number of national and international NGOs had been active since
the early 1990s in providing mostly humanitarian aid but also services in health, education, and
agricultural development. The demand for national implementing partners to deliver programmes in
agriculture, health, education, womens rights, and construction services multiplied manifold in the
period that followed the fall of the Taliban in late 2001. Currently, there are over 3,000 national and
www.appro.org.af

24

international NGOs registered with the Afghan Ministry of Economy.47 The general understanding of the
role of civil society organizations is mixed and even suspicious.48 The governmental agencies in
Afghanistan do not view CSOs as fully trustable or as reliable sources of information and expertise.
There is also little or no acceptance of the role of CSOs as watchdogs.49 Nevertheless, CSOs have been
active as individual organizations or as coalitions to lobby for legislative and other changes. Unlike Indian
CSOs, however, Afghan CSOs are largely dependent on foreign funding as local sources of support for
the sector are scarce or non-existent.

Nascent democratic government, low institutional maturity and capacity, and endemic corruption are
major hindrances to the emergence of an enabling environment for CSOs to play their full part in
governance and development in Afghanistan. Corruption is present at every level and has become a
social practice with patronage and bribery being acceptable parts of the daily life and routines.50 In India
too, corruption has become a part of daily life as evidenced in the recent spate of scandals and social
protests. The key difference between India and Afghanistan is the publics reaction to corruption.
Whereas in India there is formal recognition of the citizens concerns through such initiatives as the
India Against Corruption (2011) movement, in Afghanistan there is no organized, civil society-based
reaction to corruption and all measures and mechanisms put in place to deal with corruption are
characteristically top-down with little or no influence on corruption and corrupt practices by all manner
of officialdom.

Over the last few decades there have been major changes in India in mechanisms and legal provisions
for combating violence against women. In Afghanistan a similar trend is discernable with the key
difference that the mechanisms and legal provisions have been in place only since 2001 and thus lack
relative permanency. In both countries, although the number of cases of violence have not decreased,
more incidents of violence are being reported and more women are coming forward to seek justice from
the system due to an enabling legislative environment, increased general awareness, and formal
protection of the victims of violence.

Recommendations
Recommendations for Fighting Corruption
1. CSOs can lobby for anti-corruption laws such as the Lokpal and Lokayukta Act (2013). The thought of
being exposed and answerable to the public along with legal repercussions is likely to prohibit or
limit corruption among politicians, civil servants, and private sector actors. In addition, such
legislation is likely to empower citizens in making their dissatisfaction about corruption known to

47

Afghanistan Public Policy Research Organization, Kabul. Transitions and Non-Government Organizations in
Afghanistan: Assessments and prospects.(2014)
48
Civil society Development in Afghanistan: Elizabeth Winter.(2010).Available from:
http://www.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/research/NGPA/publications/winter
afghanistan_report_final.pdf
49
2011 CSO Sustainability Index for Afghanistan(2011) USAID. For more details see:
http://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1866/Afghanistan%20CSOSI%202011.pdf
50
Afghanistan in 2013: A Survey of Afghan People.(2013). Asia Foundation. Available from:
http://asiafoundation.org/resources/pdfs/2013AfghanSurvey.pdf

www.appro.org.af

25

2.
3.
4.

5.

governmental bodies. Corruption can also be regulated through CSOs lobbying an access to
information act similar to the RTI (2005). RTI holds the government officials accountable for any
information within a certain period of filing a request, with disciplinary consequences for those
officials who fail make information available within a specific time frame.
CSOs would be most effective if they form alliances and associations on specific issues such as
corruption. Alliances and associations would create a critical mass and minimize the possibility of
individual CSOs being singled out or persecuted by corrupt officials.
Every effort should be made by anti-corruption CSOs to engage youth and the most vulnerable, as
well as professionals such as human rights and criminal lawyers in the fight against corruption.
The Government to citizen e-governance model offers a significant potential for more active
engagement of civil society in governance. In addition, e-governance is likely to bear pressure on
governmental ministries to improve their service delivery role and efficiency, likely to result in
strengthened trust between governmental officials and their public.
Community monitoring and social audits need to be central to advocacy efforts by CSOs as they are
likely to mainstream CSOs in the political arena and curb abuses and corruption by governmental
officials.

Recommendations for Fighting Violence Against Women


6. Young girls and boys, as well as women and men, should be involved in efforts to fight violence
against women. Advocacy and education on fighting VAW must be clear that protecting the
perpetrators in the name of culture, tradition, honor, shame, or religion is inhuman toward
women. Much of the awareness changing will need to start early on within the family and in schools.
7. Religious institutions such as governmental ministries dealing with religious affairs and places of
worship such as mosques should be used as instruments for educating the public on the importance
of fighting violence against women.
8. The current laws should be implemented with as much pressure from CSOs as possible. Where there
are deficiency in the existing laws, collective efforts will need to be initiated by CSOs to effect
reform.
9. To prevent violence from occurring and re-occurring, strong punishment should be meted out to
perpetrators and results publicized through media.
10. Identifying and providing services to protect survivors and victims once crime occurs should be seen
as a necessary measure alongside legislative enforcement mechanisms.
11. Efforts should be made by CSOs to raise awareness on EVAW and gender sensitization through
capacity building programs among the judiciary and the police. Basic concepts and definitions of
VAW, situation analysis, legislation, human rights training, and religious values on protection of
basic human rights should all be employed as means to engage men and women on the importance
of womens rights.
12. Where there is resistance to training on womens rights, innovative approaches should be employed
to address womens rights within the more general framework of improving human security.

www.appro.org.af

26

Annex 1: Key Informant Interview Guiding Questions


What are the most important roles for Indian CSOS in governance?
What is the actual role of CSOs in government decision and policy making
What is the formal role allocated to CSOs by the government?
What are the significant contributions of Indian CSOs in dealing with sexual VAW and
corruption? How has government responded to them?
How can CSOS contribute to dealing more effectively with both issues so as to promote good
governance?
What are the biggest challenges that CSOs face?
What are the major challenges for CSOs and Government working together on issues of
corruption and VAW in India?
What innovative measure are CSOS taking to be heard?
What are the relations between women CSOs and those working on corruption government on
issue of VAW and corruption movements? What does the government make of all these
events/movements?
How are CSOS engaging innovatively in engaging the Government to act?
What are the good practices that would work for Afghan CSOs, the government and donors to
work collaboratively in dealing with corruption and sexual VAW?

www.appro.org.af

27

Annex 2: List of interviewees



1. Subir Roy (Programme Director, Shakti Vahini)

2. Namrata Jaitley (Deputy Director, PRIA)

3. Nandita Pradhan Bhatt (Assistant Programme Manager, PRIA)

4. Arun Kumar (Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru
University)

5. Mondira Dutta (Centre for Inner Asian Studies, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru
University)

6. Tenzing Tchoesang (UN Women Consultant, Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government
of India)

7. Renu Wadehra (Senior Advisor, Norwegian Embassy, Ministry of Foreign Affairs)

8. Prafulla Kumar Prushty (Commissioner/ Income Tax Department; on deputation as
Competent Authority and Administrator under SAFEM(FOP) Act, 1976 & NDPS Act, 1985,
Ministry of Finance, Government of India

9. Informant from Central Bureau of Investigation(CBI)

10. Amita Singh (Centre for Law and Governance, Jawaharlal Nehru University)


www.appro.org.af

28

Вам также может понравиться