Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Instability
in Lumbar
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 114.125.60.251 on 06/20/15 from IP address 114.125.60.251. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
Spondylolisthesis:
Study
L. Penning1
J R
of Several
A Radiologic
Concepts
An attempt
was made to define
more precisely
the notion
of spine instability
in
axes of spondylolisthesis.
lumbar
movement
and theBydegree
means ofof mobility
lateral radiographs
at the L3-L4, in flexion
L4-L5, and
and extension,
L5-S1
levels
the
Blickman1
were determined
in 24 cases of true (spondylolytic)
spondylolisthesis.
Axes of movement at the spondylolisthetic
levels showed
a somewhat
larger spread
in and around
the discs than at the normal levels, but instability
in the form of parallel displacement
of vertebral
endplates
was not observed.
Hypermobility
at the spondylolisthetic
level
proved to be a regular finding. The still current concept
of instability
as presented
by Knutsson
in 1944 was critically
reviewed
and denied as valid. Imprecision
in the
literature
regarding
instability
may partly
be attributed
to insufficient
discrimination
between
vertebral
displacement
as anatomic
relationship
and as abnormal
type of
movement.
By designing
a two-dimensional
model
other
movements
than flexionextension
could be studied;
a special form of instability
at the spondylolisthetic
level
was shown to appear
during forward
and backward
movement
of the lumbar spine
above it. This detailed
analysis
facilitates
understanding
of the effect of different
surgical procedures
on vertebral
movement
and instability
in lumbar spondylolisthesis.
A major
lumbar
indication
spine.
Some
instability.
bodies
during
view,
motion
of
instability
only
abnormal
forward
to
is only
visually
our
1 979:
accepted
after
(defined
dylolysis]
AJR
requests
134:293-301
to L. Penning.
February
0361-803X/80/0134-0293
American
Roentgen
Ray
by
according
$00.00
placed,
Society
study.
place
between
lesion
also
In their
a sign
differ;
measured
only
parallel
[4].
Exces-
considered
a sign
in many
reliably
the
of instability.
of
the
as
of
Opinions
instances
evaluated
with
movement
if the
and
angle
of lumbar
such
presence
in detail.
in spondylolisthesis
of
films
relationship,
opinion,
or analyzed
be
both
L5-S1
vertebrae
In their
as
anatomic
abnormal
measurements
and
such
of
vertebral
also
movements
can
the
of instability.
is
the
is the gradual
progression
of
[6]. Other
authors
[4, 7] relate
to instability.
not
of
of movement
the
is already
on lateral
series
Newman
of the
1980
characteristic
type
of
to criteria
in alignment
take
of
instability
of
spines
axes
of
at normal
movement
in flexion
this
levels.
between
and
extension,
interspaces.
and Methods
.
dress
slip
and
and
L4-L5,
tests
regard
of instability
over the years
determined,
made
In a consecutive
sits; DepartmentofDgnosbcRadiokgyUniver:
reprint
were
Subjects
but
movement
determinations
L3-L4,
type
with
changes
not
site
abnormal
exactly
are
at the
Received
February
9,
revision
August 22, 1979.
and
assessed
opinion,
vertebrae
the
radiographs
static
normal
movement
Such
or
on
regard
does
at
movement,
displacement
malalignment
In
normally
5]. A special
in spondylolisthesis
displacement
consider
or loading
is
imprecise
is an abnormal
movement
[4,
in spondylolisthesis
is rather
[1 -3]
studies
which
range
fusion
literature
essentially
displacement,
not
the
authors
instability
sive
for surgical
Yet
[8]
as caused
interarticular
parts
to a modification
tilting
For
table
the flexion
of 38 patients
x-ray
study,
with
the
by a congenital
of the
neural
of the method
unit,
a radiologic
patient
the patient
bends
of true
or nonacutely
arch),
of Meschan
bends
diagnosis
acquired
flexion-extension
backward
forward
defect
studies
[9]. Standing
maximally
maximally
spondylolisthesis
against
for
with knees
were
[sponmade
the vertically
the
extension
extended
and
PENNING
294
TABLE
1 : Exposition
of Material
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 114.125.60.251 on 06/20/15 from IP address 114.125.60.251. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
L3,
0,
(1
Movement
(mm)
of Arch
with
L3-L4
L4-L5
L5-51
Body
underiying
22
10
11
12(c)
21
?(?)
14
14
L4:
0, 2
1980
Re-
ver-
15
10
10
20
15
2
21
25
12
6(v)
4(c)
4(v)
6
7
20
10
20
13
17
19
4(c)
16
18
12
25
17
12
18
28
5(v)
18
10
19
17
25
6(v)
15
11
17
12
18
3(v)
15
12
13
14
14
11
13
20
15
12
14
19
15
5(v)
4(c)
7(v)
10
5
7
15
10
15
21
10(v)
17
16
17
18
19
20
21
12
12
11
15
10
7
18
8
7
10
12
15
19
21
7
15
13
13
II, 22
III,23
lV,24
10
19
10
7
20
21
10
6(v)
5(c)
5(c)
4(v)
4(c)
4(v)
10(c)
14
16
9
14
10
15
12
4
II, 5
L5:
134, February,
spec to.
-- .
-.
Movement
..
of Lysis.
Case No
AJR:
BLICKMAN
of Measurements
_________
Flexion-Extension
vertebra
Grade.
and Results
AND
17
5
0:
8
3(c)
I:
caudally;
11
4(v)
10
4(v)
Fig.
leaning
adjusted
were
cases
the
reliable
vertebrae
omitted
aged
was
cases.
51
and
to this
height
of the
feet
table.
Three
x-ray
surgical
intervention.
pictures
cases
vertebra
did
was
nounced
5.
discs
is
system,
case,
grade
slip,
flexion
not
horizontal
but
move
51
older
upper
the
allow
only
with
and
bilateral
cases
(cases
respect
4.
and
movement
between
lumbar
vertebrae
way.
upper
outlines
of the
film
L5 vertebral
The process
the successive
drawn.
between
to the
7, and
Disc
narrowing
disc
had
of the
Disc
in
was
of
(I-IV)
at each
place
arch
IV.
at the
transitional
this
vertebra
narrowing
1 9 cases,
at L3-L4
slightly
below
most
prowas noted
narrowed.
All
the vertebral
of the
upper
superimposition
(method
of movement
of Begg
films
box.
when
superimposed
in the
Cranial
the
lines
same
to the
of
film.
and
way
between
as for
First
are
the
and
placed
outlines
at segments
Falconer
on
of
L3-L4,
[1 1])
(fig.
top
of each
other
the
body
the
of
1).
L4-
vertebra
The
perior
part
millimeters
on
sacrum
a second
vertebral
moving
identical
their
and
of the
landmarks
bisecting
The
vertebra
perpendiculars
correct
body
is correctly
position
shadows
of
given
2 mm
or
by
more
do not superimpose
the
needle.
is identified
on rotation
film.
of the
shadows
the radiologic
the
Next,
measure-
superimposed
vertebral
superimposed
constructing
of movement
the
one
lower
Movement
of the arch of the spondylolisthetic
vertebra
respect
to its body, and with respect
to the vertebra
below.
range
extension
axis
from
along
on the
of a moving
by drawing
the
are
superimposed
and
drawn
of motion.
(principle
which intersect
at the
method
is rather time
visually estimated
by
above. A sharp needle
the lower film, and the
cranial vertebral
body
deviation
bodies
between
vertebra
is
a baseline
is repeated
with L4 and L3. The angles
lines indicate
the amount
of movement
of movement.
of movement
occurs,
normal.
are
line
to form
segment
moving
I slip;
grade
of range
body,
axis
films
is determined
vertebra
a grade
case,
sacrum;
1 9).
patients.
L4-L5
parts
L5
one
ment
body
a pencil
of the
extension
at L5 in
of the
a lumbosacral
noted
the
and
equal
lysis
had
was
1 3,
four
1 6 cases
Ill;
and
Made
viewing
in same
superimposed
taking
surface
into
female
spondylolisthetic
vertebra
appeared
L5-S1
and
of
Three
Flexion-extension
and
measured
margins
line
In 1 1
did not
were
(table
at L4
to ventral,
By this
In case
Determinations
the
scale.
Called
in the
33)
slip
no
seven
case,
divided
dorsal
portions.
that
case
in one
forward
spondylolisthetic
other
(average,
at L3
II; one
had
cases,
years
[10]
grade
invariably
L5.
The
of the
of previous
(accepted)
from
the
interarticular
in
1 3-63
vertebra,
cases,
Four
24
Meyerding
according
are
Axes of movement
localized
graded
the
floor.
of the flexion-extension
remaining
1 7 male,
two
on the
the foot-rest
because
quality
the
isthesis
the
stool
or raising
evaluation.
Of
20
on a small
by lowering
cases
of angular
ventrally.
are
hands
1 -Determination
by superimposition
of radiographs
in flexion and extension.
Images of L5 are
superimposed,
and line is drawn along edge of upper film on lower film.
Similar line drawn after superimposition
of images
of Si . Angle between
lines
is angular
excursion
between
L5-S1 . Angular
excursions
between
other
of the arch
(at
and its direction
magnification
of the
below)
the
the site
determined
factor
body
of the
movement
of
the
(no
of about
spondylolisthetic
of the anterosu-
lysis)
is measured
correction
is made
1.35).
with
After
in
for
INSTABILITY
1980
IN LUMBAR
SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
295
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 114.125.60.251 on 06/20/15 from IP address 114.125.60.251. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
13#{176}(6-20)
14#{176}(7-20)
16#{176}(8-21)
Fig. 2.-Determination
of axis of movement
by Euler principle.
Movement
diagram.
Lower
vertebra
(51)
presumed
to be fixed;
upper
vertebra
(L5)
depicted
in position
of flexion
and extension
with respect
to lower
vertebra.
Identical
points
of upper
vertebra
(a and a, b and b, c and c, etc.)
are
connected
and perpendiculars
erected
at midpoints
aa, bb , and cc , intersection
of perpendiculars
being
axis of movement.
Fig.
Average
4.-Site
mobitity
of axis of movement
and its spread
given
Fig.
vertebral
5.-Movement
body
(A)
in
for
normal
discs
each segment.
in
same
subtects.
22#{176}
15T2-#{176})
17#{176}(6-28)
A
Fig.
3.-Site
L3-L4,
of axis
of movement
at disc
below
spondylolytic
vertebra.
respect
to caudal
endplates
of slipped
vertebra.
varying
in grade from case to case, is not indicated
axes with respect
to cranial
endplates
of vertebra
Average
mobility
and its spread given for each segment.
direction
Results
The average
of movement
range of movement
for flexion-extension
spondylolisthetic
presents
the
material
(L3-L4,
vertebrae
same
data
L4-L5,
are
and location
of the axes
in the discs below the
given
L5-S1).
in figure
discs
All discs
3. Figure
in the
same
of undimin-
ished
and
of movement.
height
vertebra
measured
5 at L5-Si.
not
have
normal
of separated
arch
with
body
of vertebra
below
Dotted
outline:
located
been
discs
extension
directly
listed
were
as
respect
to
(B). Arrows
(1);
below
normal.
22 at L3-L4,
solid
corresponding
indicate
main
outline:
flexion
(2)
a spondylolisthetic
The
number
20 at L4-L5,
of
and
PENNING
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 114.125.60.251 on 06/20/15 from IP address 114.125.60.251. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
296
AND
BLICKMAN
1980
Fig. 6.-Spondylolisthetic
lumbosacral spine in flexion
(A) and extension
(B).
1 = axis of movement
L4-L5;
2 = axis
of movement
L5-S1
: 3 = projection
of
joint space
of intervertebral
joint L4-L5;
4 = projection
of joint space
of intervertebral joint L5-S1 : 5 = defect
at interarticular
part; 6 = flaval ligament
L4-L5;
7 = flaval ligament
L5-S1.
Movement
between
vertebra
(fig.
case it could
was
absent
took
place
arch
with
body
and arch
5) averaged
not reliably
(table
1 ). Movement
in caudal
respect
(from
or ventral
3-12
mm).
in another
extension
In one
case it
to flexion)
direction.
Movement
below
was always
to the vertebra
and
of the spondylolisthetic
6 mm (range,
be determined;
of the
present
and averaged
12 mm (range,
2-18
mm). It invariably
place
(from extension
to flexion)
in the cranial
direction.
L5 is less
ensure
arches
stability
of L4 and
lntra-
51 . Our
and
Intervertebral
Stability
of the lumbar
spine as a whole
is maintained
by
the cooperation
of discs,
joints,
and ligaments.
According
to Spalteholz
and Spanner
[1 3], the intervertebral
discs
determine
vertebrae,
the extent
of possible
movements
between
the
the intervertebral
joints
the direction
of these
movements.
The
slipping
The
flaval
tebrae
force
together
Stability
ample
of
the
of
arch,
articular
element.
with
of L5,
has
become
L5-S1
(fig.
of
vertebral
them
processes
as one
and
arches
pressing
between
ligaments
between
shown
arch
with
narrowing
may
be regarded
as the
and
in turn
of the
lumbar
interarticular
on
the
the
will
spine
portions
bodies
vertebral
bodies
L4-
of L5.
vertebral
body
respect
and
L5-S1
often
plane,
and averages
flaval
ligaments
on
as their
joints
movement
combined
bone
, its move-
intervertebral
this
to the
as a linking
L5-
is always
with
some
in
rota-
lateral
(capsular)
portions
stability
of the
spondylolisthetic
stressed
in the
specimens,
parts
of
of cases
is
of the
worth
disc
of patients
common
in
body
It has
model
been
of template
mentioning
that Jonck
noted
complete
disappearance
the flaval
ligaments
in a large
in which
in our series
vertebral
literature.
narrowing
and
clinically
was
found.
As
the literature
[3],
disc
manifest
spondolylis-
thesis.
Axes
of Movement
at Normal
and
Spondylolisthetic
Levels
as a
of the
L5 and
intervertebral
L4-L5
show
insufficiently
percentage
as the
1 , movements
of
joints
the body
of L5 with
functions
by the (normal)
is minimal
[1 5], in autopsy
of the capsular
and
process
arch
accounted
for in the construction
Al . In this context
it is perhaps
body
and
body
been
between
element,
the vertebral
dependent
in the ex-
instability
stability
of the
ver-
with
interarticular
(table
body)
intravertebral
(L5
vertebral
has
a
of the arch
direction,
in ensuring
exert
the
or caudal
in the
spinous
movements
Stability
elasticity,
vertebra
processes
mainly
high
by the lysis
to vertebral
anterior
neighbour.
aligned.
movement
stability
6).
their
allowing
affect
the intervertebral
whole.
Due to the separation
arch
to
keeping
These
respect
manifestation
due
in preventing
to its caudal
spondylolisthetic
articular
inferior
respect
6) is diminished
its
superior
essential
with
on the
and
of fig.
part
arch
are
ligaments,
contracting
other
joints
of a vertebra
intervertebral
of a spondylolytic
measurements
cranial
Instability
the
relationship
Si . The
between
the flaval
ment being directed
Discussion
because
only
occurs
with
regard
to the caudal
vertebra
(in our
example
Si ), and not with regard
to the cranial
vertebra.
The flaval ligaments
[1 4], especially
their medial
(laminar)
parts,
took
affected
normal
bony
why slipping
L5 maintain
This explains
Si
disc
L4
of axes
acterized
by abnormal
by local
and
spine, movement
between
to a fixed pattern,
best
degree
deviation
location
of mobility.
from
or behavior
this
Instability
pattern,
of axes
the vertedefined
by
is char-
as evidenced
and/or
excessive
AJR:
134.
mobility.
February
1980
Normal
movement
has been
INSTABILITY
IN LUMBAR
comprehensively
stud-
297
SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
ied by anatomists
flexion-extension
in or near
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 114.125.60.251 on 06/20/15 from IP address 114.125.60.251. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
logic
determinations
in normal
discs
of axes
(fig.
4) are
of flexion-ftxtension
in agreement
movement
with
the findings
of
these anatomists.
The number
of measured
normal discs
L5-Si
is small; however,
there is no reason to assume that
this disc should behave differently.
Whereas
instability
in spondylolisthesis
could reveal itself
by abnormal
location
of axes of movement,
our measurements demonstrate
only that the axes of movement
in the
discs below a spondylolisthetic
vertebra
show a somewhat
larger
spread
than normal
(fig. 3). Regarding
the significance of this larger spread,
the work of Rolander
[1 8] is
important.
In comparing
the axes of movement
C centers
of
motion
of normal
specimens,
the
and degenerated
he found
latter.
In his
interpreted
as
placement
lumbar
a significantly
opinion,
this
indicating
larger
larger
instability
of movement
an abnormal
ment
without
such.
The
larger
comparable
explained
dylolytic
that
shift
spread
deformation
and
stability
It may
directing
of the
found
effect
has
accordance
in the
that,
of the intervertebral
below
movement
finding.
a shift
surprising
the
largely
the
Obviously
is not to guide
joints
may be
a spon-
of
disc
the
location
The
axis.
absence
of a
on the movements
vertebra,
unchanged.
the
This
Rolander
type
with
disc
around
the intervertebral
discs,
with a distribution
comparable to that found
by us in spondylolisthesis.
From a representative
of
also
is in
endplates
pearance
[1 8],
who
result
Instability
by Knutsson
(c).
disc
instability
[4] in a paper
degeneration.
dealing
was
introduced
with instability
In flexion-extension
mal vertebral
movements
were noted and
results
of loss of stability.
The abnormal
in 1944
associated
studies,
interpreted
abnoras the
movements
conof vertebrae
as evidenced
sisted of parallel
displacement
from backward
displacement
( retroposition
) in extension,
disappearing
partially
or entirely
in flexion.
Backward
displacement
thus constituted
a temporary
position
and consequently
was considered
a manifestation
of instability.
On reconstruction
of the axes of movement
in the illustrations
of the paper [4], they were found to be located
in or
case
(fig.
7),
change
their
of backward
of
abnormal
movement
axis.
suIts
were
with
instability
it is evident
angle
during
displacement
parallel
which,
excentric
[1, 3,
The
ment
designation
(A) has
determiassesswere at
slipping.
Disc
Fig. 7.-Ostensible
parallel
movement
from extension
to flexion
normal
placement
of axis of movement
(1 in B). This illustrates
that
nation
of axis is more reliable
method
to judge
movement
than visual
ment.
Parallel
displacement
would
occur
only if axis of movement
(2)
infinity
below
of the
the
joints
of
by compensatory
of movement
and
despite
experiments
is
This
below
be speculated
that excision
of the intervertebral
change
the location
of axes
specimens.
as
It could
spondylolisthetic
remained
with
of move-
stability
in spondylolisthesis
degeneration
despite
dis-
exceeded
axis
and
vertebra
is accompanied
ensure
a normal
type
seem
disc
noted
ciably
location
of axes
\,,
be
of movement
is a regular
spondylolisthetic
alterations
that
of the
type
never
in
not
parallel
to that found
in disc degeneration.
by the fact that disc degeneration
vertebra
lasting
in the
affecting
of axes
could
because
small
about
in autopsy
spread
spread
range of 1 mm (exceptionally
in normal
discs.
Disc degeneration
the
discs
gliding,
however,
Similar
made
but
takes
in disc
with
illustrations
in other
degeneration
and
imprecision
subluxation
comparable
papers
redealing
spondylolysthesis
in literature
regarding
vertebral
) and instability,
in our opinion,
discrimination
relationship,
and forward
displacement
essarily
imply abnormal
investigations
indicate
has
been
type
of movement
6)
determination
judgement
sequently
preserved.
easily
type
gives
of the
normal
visual
, the changes
(e.g.
whether
instability,
that
rise
axis
to erroneous
of
movement
or not abnormal
is present.
as
anatomic
relationin disc degeneration
in spondylolisthesis,
of movement.
However,
displaceis partly
between
displacement
and displacement
abnormal
type of movement.
Abnormal
ships such as backward
displacement
fig.
vertebral
The disapis not the
71.
related
to insufficient
as abnormal
anatomic
our
the
a normal
type of
around
a slightly
of
place
reconstructions
from
that
movement.
in flexion
movement
as a rule
assessment
in alignment
of
interpretation.
will
movement,
allow
the
L5-Sl
in
Only
reliable
and
con-
298
PENNING
AND
BLICKMAN
AJR:
Fig. 8.-Same
in fig.
6, not
February,
1980
lumbosacral
spine
in flexion-extension,
back-and-forth
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 114.125.60.251 on 06/20/15 from IP address 114.125.60.251. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
134,
movement
Numbers
as
but
in
of L4 with reindicate
same
spect
to Si .
structures
as in fig. 6. Despite
absence
of much
movement
of arches
and flaval
ligaments,
marked
wobbling
of body
of L5 is evident.
Relationships
in intervertebral
joints
L4-L5
(3) and L5-S1
(4)
remain
normal.
Arch
of L5 positioned
about
51
may
from
Several
authors
[2, 7] discussing
instability
report
on
positive
correlation
with complaints
of low back pain. In our
opinion,
the abnormal
vertebral
relationship
itself,
being
more pronounced
in certain
extreme
positions
of the spine,
with
bony
intervertebral
Myelography
as
before
[5,
phlebography
surgery
It may
[201
be argued
that
not determined
by repeating
patient,
but
is a good
limited
believe
extension
22]
have
in
axis
whole.
motion,
into
than
are
metry,
enough
[4] and
the
more
from
midposition
cineradiography,
exposures
reliable.
Perhaps
grammetry
is that
make
smaller
determination
A satisfactory
solution
the best perspectives
[24],
but
this
method
to
and
the
more
by one fixed
anas
center
its place
of
from
type of movement.
stereophotogram-
of
movement
of
axes
insertion
positions
or
does
not
[24]
described
motion
in daily
under
that for certain
clockwise
sense,
but wobbled
[1 8] noted
flexion
of the upper
lumbar
spine
during
longitudinal
Selvik
are chosen,
flexion-extension
rich variety
of movements
made
noted paradoxical
movements
Hoag
motion
It
if
not
move
back
and
in
extension
loading
of
of the
and forth.
spine
of
his
as that
positions.
the supine
instability
Back-and-Forth
and
merit
erect
standing
consideration.
These
Instability
As our studies
idea was
the basis
two
less
of tan-
had been
limited
to flexion-extension,
the
developed
to use a schematic
drawing
(fig. 6) as
for a model
for additional
motion
studies
in the
sagittal
plane.
The model (fig. Al is a template
for construction of such a model)
allows
all kind of movements
around
the axes of movement
as determined
by us. Figure
8 shows
one of the possible
movements
of the model
in which
L4 is
the discs
of flexion-extentest of instability.
will occur
only
example,
types of
displaced
of movement
conditions.
of spinal
other
Simple
only
mobile
segments
extension
in, for
with
between
method
can
of an unstable
pile of blocks,
the different
showing
different
modes
of flexion
and
abnormal
of the latter
studies
such
the
[25],
made.
of L4 and
consequently
applied
loads are
movements
arches
flexion
to a more
anterior
shift seems
to be made
by
Instability
might
consist
of
flexion-extension
ranges
flexion
disc,
to extension
shifting
more complex
methods,
like
or
from
in the
flexion
of movement
aberrations
of this
by sophisticated
[1 8, 21,
to extension
from
by an axis
flexion
authors
of movement
posteriorly
and
extra
other
continuous
Rolander
the lower
reliability
between
in the vertebrae
specimen.
within
However,
positions
out
We
between
sion radiography
is conceivable
special
cases
there
axes
indicators
be used postoperatively.
Another
question
is whether
fully represent
the
life. Several
authors
of
Several
the axis
to rule
others.
because
discs.
other
consideration.
that
of
studies
many
positions
in-between
the extremes,
movements
could
be detected.
A disadvantage
method
methods
pathology
representative
a more
posterior
position
in
position
in extension.
A similar
the nucleus
pulposus
[4, 23J.
discrete
Perhaps
and
this
of flexion-extension
in location
in movement
Movement
method
around
is located
but
contrast
is not sensitive
by Knutsson
by taking
of movement
teriorly,
demonstrate
the
they
and
shown
midposition
should
agreement
be enhanced
and
other
the reproducibility
flexion-extension
overall
area
could
1 9] and
canal
for
is undertaken.
radiography
that we used
disc instability
as defined
have
ments
contents
of spinal
very
well account
on
foramina,
correlation.
such
the
could
impingement
talum
halfway
located
respect
L4-L5
by flexion
movement,
resisting
parallel
L4-L5
axes
to Si
and
. In this
L5-Si
of movement.
takes
displacement,
place around
Forward
displacement
movement
in
the normally
of L4 with
and
extension
although
possible,
elasticity
of the flaval
at L5-Si
is very
ligaments.
. Normally
limited
For
due to
instance,
such
the
as
INSTABILITY
IN
LUMBAR
of angles
very
be related
unequal
tensions
mobility
vertebral
in the flaval
of the
body
in
ligaments.
posterior
arch
However,
with
spondylolisthesis,
respect
tensions
in
due
ligaments
are more equally
distributed
with the spinous
process
remaining
about halfway between the spinous processes of L4 and Si , both in forward
and backward
movement of L4 with respect to Si . The normal faculty
of parallel
displacement
of vertebrae
situated
two or more segments
apart (clearly
to be differentiated
from parallel displacement
between
bordering
vertebrae,
which
is definitely
to
Larger
of the
1 .
level
flaval
of movement,
determination
and construction
of a theoretical
movement
in the saggital
plane
to the
the
299
SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 114.125.60.251 on 06/20/15 from IP address 114.125.60.251. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
1980
resent
instability of the
than normal
spondylolisthesis
a special
form
spread
of
axes in spondylolisthesis
disc
of axes
spine.
of axes of movement
occurs,
but is unlikely
instability.
The
is probably
related
Parallel
parallel
movement
of adjoining
ment
3.
displacement
is only
ostensible;
thesis
logic
studies
this
type
will
intervertebral
be necessary
of instability
and
joints.
Further
to determine
to assess
radio-
the extent
its clinical
by Excessive
Another
4.
significance.
hypermobility
of the disc
In our
material,
thesis
of
L5
was
discs L5-Si
, it
too small to have
of large individual
normal
range
definitely
called
below
average
of L5-Si
vertebra.
In the
five
normal
difficulty
(below
we compared
a spondylolisthetic
the
mobility
of at least
affected
six
10
more.
segment
cases,
less.
cases
Local
cases;
was
average
less
mobility
hypermobility
mobility
in
one-third
exceeded
average
mobility
cases
mobility
was
less.
hypermobility
spondylolisthetic
the
affected
segment
In 1 2 cases
than
1 0#{176}
more.
in the
thus
of
In the
affected
was
these
by at least
These
data
had
the mobility
Hadley
found
(25%
of
the
disc
below
Jackson
AM, Kirwan
the
finding
of the
in spondylolisslipped
disc.
studies
of the
spine.
subluxation.
6.
Dandy
DJ,
9.
1 0.
a
11.
1 2.
the
1 3.
MJ.
PH.
Joint
severe
:472(group
53 : 578-595
of lumbar
J Bone
pain.
lum-
1965;47
subluxation
instability
back
with
(Br]
The
etiology
vertebrae
as
Surg
(Br]
Joint
J Bone
of spondylolisthesis.
Joint
: 39-59
I. An atlas of anatomy
1975: 552
basic
to radiology.
Philadel-
HW.
Spondylolisthesis.
Surg
Gynecol
Obstet
1932;54 :371-377
Begg AC, Falconer
MA. Plain radiography
in intraspinal
protrusion of lumbar intervertebral
discs: a correlation
with operative
findings.
BrJSurg
1949;36:225-239
Olsson TH, Selvik G, Willner S. Vertebral
motion in spondylolisthesis.
Acta Radio! [Diagn](Stockh)
1976;i 7 : 861 -868
Spalteholz
W, Spanner
R. Handatlas
und Lehrbuch
der AnaMeyerding
des
Menschen,
1 5th
Nachemson
A, Evans
third
lumbar
human
Jonck
disc
ed.
Amsterdam:
Scheltema
& Hol-
1953:70
1967;1
JBiomech
Conclusions
Lumbosacral
Primary
low
Surg
Saunders,
tomie
1 5.
TH.
of
(Br] 1963;45
kema,
14.
King
associated
Joint
:6-22
Meschan
phia:
syndrome
J Bone
cause
Spine
J Bone
Shannon
FP,
Newman
Surg
the
A clinical
spondylolisthesis).
Morgan
level.
PH.
1957;39
total)
EO, Sullivan
lumbosacral
bosacral
481
1 0#{176}.
In only 25% of
indicate
that
local
of the lumbar
spine at the
vertebra
is common.
as demform
of
1964:416-417
Newman
8.
was
of
Thomas,
5.
remaining
in 75%
of move-
vertebra,
a special
LA. Anatomico-roentgenographic
common
in the
segment
universal
Knutsson
F. The instability
in the lumbar spine. Acta
0;
in six
not
by hypermobility
4.
7,
vertebra)
segments
in the same lumbar spine. The average
mobility
in discs below a spondylolisthetic
vertebra
is larger
than in the other two discs measured
(table 1 ). In normal
discs,
mobility
never exceeded
21
in spondylolisthetic
segments,
mobility
between
21 #{176}and 28#{176}
was found in eight
cases. If the mobility of the abnormal
disc is compared
with
the average
mobility
of the two other normal discs in each
case,
above
0)
this
abnormal
axes
the
80-84
3.
1 5#{176}
(range,
8#{176}-2i
This number
is
statistical
significance.
Moreover,
because
variations,
Tanz [26] failed to obtain a
of mobility
from which deviations
could be
abnormal.
was
individual
but
is instability
in spondylolis-
60_300).
could
opinion,
REFERENCES
is local
a spondylolisthetic
mobility
1 8#{176}
(range,
In order
to overcome
mobility
of normal
and
A common
Springfield:
considered
instability,
In our
of
Mobility
form of instability
of
instability.
Instability
spread
are situated
in or around
their normal
sites.
The increased
faculty
for back and forth
movements
normal
of the
at the
to rep-
to the attendant
vertebrae,
of the spine
above
the spondylolisthetic
onstrated
in the model,
is considered
function
larger
by Knutsson
[4] as the primary
sign of disc
not be demonstrated
in spondylolisthesis.
all types
of
that may
degeneration.
2.
abnormal)
of movement,
model
allowing
offers observations
LM.
space
The
JH.
Some
interlaminar
mechanical
properties
ligament
of the
(ligamentum
flavum).
:211-220
mechanical
narrowing.
disturbances
J Bone
Joint
resulting
Surg
(Br]
from
1961
lumbar
43 : 362-
375
Radiologic
lumbar spine
assessment
of flexion-extension
in spondylolisthesis
by means
studies of the
of measurement
1 6.
Fick
lenke.
R.
Handbuch
Jena:
Gustav
der
Anatomie
Fischer,
1904
und
der
Mechanik
der
Ge-
300
1 7.
1 8.
PENNING
Strasser
H. Lehrbuch
Springer,
1913
Rolander
SC.
der
Muske!
und
Ge!enkmechanik.
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 114.125.60.251 on 06/20/15 from IP address 114.125.60.251. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
20.
21.
Laasonen
Berlin:
BLICKMAN
22.
Hoag
fication
Motion
of the lumbar
spine
with
special
to the stabilizing
effect of posterior
fusion.
study
on autopsy
specimens.
Acta
Orthop
1966;90 :1-127
19.
AND
EM,
EhrstrOm
J. Myelography
reference
An experimental
Scand
in lumbar
23.
(suppl]
vertebrae
back
pain. AJR
in normal
1944;52
individuals
:261-268
and
in patients
surface
JM, Kosek
with
low
25.
26.
M, Moser
of vertebral
JS,
Hampson
strain
(Br] 1978;6O
24.
spondylo-
listhesis.
Acta Radio!
(Diagn]
(Stockh)
1 978; 1 9 : 889-896
Th#{233}ronJ, Moret J. Spinal phlebography.
Lumbar
and cervical
techniques.
Berlin: Springer,
1978:81
-91
Gianturco
C. A roentgen
analysis
of the motion
of the lower
lumbar
986
Shah
AJR:
in the
motion.
WGJ,
cadaveric
134,
February,
1980
JR. Kinematic
analysis
and classiJAQA 1960;59
: 899-908,
982Jayson
lumbar
MIV.
spine.
The distribution
of
J Bone Joint Surg
:246-251
Selvik G. A roentgen
stereophotogrammetric
method for the
study of the kinematics
of the skeletal
system (thesis).
Lund:
AV-centralen,
1974
Wiltse LL, Hutchinson
RH. Surgical
treatment
of spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop 1964;35:
116-135
Tanz SS. Motion of the lumbar spine. A roentgenologic study.
AJR 1953;69
:399-412
134,
February
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 114.125.60.251 on 06/20/15 from IP address 114.125.60.251. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
AJR:
INSTABILITY
1980
IN LUMBAR
SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
301
#{149}1
/
/
/
/
I
I
/
I
/
/
/
/
I
.rt/
S.
S.
.,
.0
Fig.
51
Al
After
of axes
insertion
-Template
template
for
movable
spondylolisthetic
to cardboard
(indicated
by numbers
1 for L4-L5
and
of elastic
bands
representing
flaval
lumbosacral
or transparent
spine:
plastic,
lateral
vertebrae
projections
of
L4,
L5
2 for L5-Sl),
perforating
them,
and inserting
pin.
ligaments
(3-3
for L4-L5
and 4-4
for L5-Sl).
(body
and
to articulate
separated
arch),
and
by superimposition
Perforation
of holes in arches
allows
By inserting
pin through
holes
5,
intravertebral
instability
of L5 due to separated
arch is abolished;
parallel movements
between
L4 and 51 (fig. 8) then meet with much
greater resistance.
Insertion
of pin through
holes 6 imitates spondylodesis
anterior
L5-Sl
; movements
between
bodies
of L5 and 51
are abolished,
but movements
between
arches L5 and 51 are still possible.
Figure
6 may help in the construction.
An imperfection
in the model is that. for reasons of construction,
axis of movement
L5-S1
has been taken as axis of movement
for
arch of L5. Movement
of arch in spondylolisthesis
is determined
by flaval ligaments
and intervertebral
joints
L5-S1
. but not by disc
L5-S1 . In practice,
no circumscribed
location
of axis for movement
of arch, with respect to body of L5 or Si . could be found.